Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Nurs Clin North Am. 2014 Mar 27;49(2):133–145. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2014.02.002

Improving unsafe environments to support aging independence with limited resources

Sarah L Szanton, Jill Roth, Manka Nkimbeng, Jessica Savage, Rachel Klimmek
PMCID: PMC4074077  NIHMSID: NIHMS580905  PMID: 24846463

Synopsis

Aging with independence benefits individuals, family and society. To achieve independence, older adults must be able to function in their homes. This function is determined both by their abilities and by the environment in which they maneuver. In this article, we describe a promising program that intervenes with both older adults and their home environments to improve function. This program, called CAPABLE, is funded through the Affordable Care Act and can be scaled up nationally if determined to be a success in improving health and decreasing health care costs.

Keywords: Function, older adults, disability, inter-professional


Aging with independence is important to older adults for multiple reasons; it affords better quality of life for older individuals and their families,1 and is a foundational American value that, when achieved, saves resources for society to use in other ways. The projected number of older adults in the United States is projected to continue growing,2 making it increasingly urgent to identify ways to support aging with independence. For many older adults, the challenges are socioeconomic.3 However, for almost everyone, at every income level, aging brings functional challenges that can compromise independence. These functional challenges result from interactions between an individual’s health and his or her surrounding environment. Low income older adults face even greater challenges to independence since they are have more co-morbidities,3 experience more functional limitations as a result,4,5 and by definition, have fewer resources to modify their home environments. This combination places them at even greater risk for reduced activity levels, social isolation, falls, and other adverse events. The purpose of this article is to briefly explain how unsafe environments affect older adults with functional limitations, and to describe an inter-professional model of care, called CAPABLE (Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders), that addresses both individual and environmental aspects of aging with independence. This article also provides tools and lessons while implementing this innovative model of care within a community of urban-dwelling, low income older adults with multiple functional limitations.

Unsafe Exterior Environments Pose Barriers to Aging with Independence

Every level of the environment supports or inhibits function and health.6 From the neighborhood surrounding an older adult’s home, to the steps leading up to their front door, to the interior of the house and each room - all of these environments affect an older adult’s ability to function well enough to age-in-place.

Neighborhood

Neighborhood of residence can affect health and safety in later life. This is particularly true in urban settings where factors such as broken or littered sidewalks and busy streets, a lack of safe spaces to exercise, or the geography of gun violence and other threats 710 pose risks that keep some older adults indoors. Some neighborhoods also contain food “deserts”, meaning places lacking markets with ready supplies of produce and other options essential to a healthy diet. Unsafe neighborhoods not only prevent older adults from engaging in the types of activities associated with sustaining an independent living situation (e.g. shopping, medical appointments, outdoor exercise); they can also interfere with older adults’ ability to visit the places many associate with a high quality of life (e.g. green spaces, houses of worship, senior centers, the homes of family and friends). Similarly, other barriers which may be more common to suburban and rural environments, such as the absence of sidewalks and other walkways, adequate lighting, and public transportation; geographic features such as steep inclines; or natural features such as mud and brush, can render older adults homebound.

House exterior

Upon opening their front doors, many older adults are essentially stuck at the top of their own front steps due to broken stairs, a lack of adequate railings, or stairs that are too steep or slippery for many older adults’ increasingly weak leg muscles to navigate. Each time they descend these steps or return, these individuals face the risk of falling, which can lead to serious injury or even death. Unsafe stairs pose a threat when older adults must go out (for example, to attend a medical appointment) and also bar exiting the home for ‘optional’ activities such as volunteer work, socializing with friends and family, or participating in religious services. These disparities in housing conditions can lead to health disparities as community-dwelling older adults derive benefits from social engagement outside of their home such as caregiving for friends or neighbors,11,12 working part-time, 13 or attending church and family activities.14 Onset of functional decline, which can put older adults at-risk when entering or exiting their homes if proper safety measures are not in place, have been linked to cessation of these types of potentially-beneficial activities.15

Unsafe Home Interiors Can Pose Even Greater Threats to Aging with Independence

Although unsafe exterior environments, such as communities with neighborhood violence and broken sidewalks, pose some of the most visibly obvious threats to the health and well-being of older persons, often the most dangerous place for these adults is inside their own homes. Interactions between underlying health conditions and unsafe home interiors result in functional limitations that not only place older adults at-risk for injury, but also prevent them from doing the things they associate with living well. Given the daunting challenges of addressing the problems that may exist outside an older adult’s home, the rest of this article focuses on strategies for supporting aging with independence by addressing the safety issues that often exist inside older adults’ homes and contribute to functional limitations in later life.

Fall risk and the home environment

One in three adults fall every year with subsequent morbidity including nursing home admission and mortality.16,17 Not only are the falls dangerous, but so is remaining on the ground if unable to arise. Individual (intrinsic) factors contributing to falls include decreased mobility, decreased balance, decreased vision, and medications that act on the Central Nervous System. External (extrinsic) factors are equally important and include clutter, uneven or hole-ridden floors, inadequate railing or banisters, steep stairs, oxygen tubing, wires in walking spaces, and slick surfaces such as bathroom floors. Finally, there are extrinsic factors that are made more dangerous by interactions with intrinsic factors. For example, slippery bathtubs with high sides in the home of someone with poor balance, toilets without grab bars in the home of someone with weak legs (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A client practices using grab bars to exit the bathtub

ADLs/IADLs and Environmental Factors

Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), including bathing, grooming, getting on and off of the toilet, getting in and out of the bed, and dressing are, by definition, essential to daily life. Community-dwelling older adults who cannot safely do these activities on their own must rely on informal or paid caregivers in order to age-in-place. Due to a tendency to focus on illness management, rather than function, medical and nursing professionals may fail to adequately assess and address older adults’ functional challenges – even though function is the key to staying independent. An estimated $350 billion each year is spent on nursing home care for people unable to function independently. An additional $450 billion in unpaid care is provided by informal or family caregivers assisting older adults in performing everyday self-care tasks.18 As the population ages, these costs will continue to climb unless we intervene.

An Innovative Model for Promoting Aging-with-Independence: The CAPABLE Intervention

Practical realities related to both older adults’ preferences for living independently and increased demands on families and other caregivers associated with a growing aging population demonstrate a clear need to find sustainable models of care that address both the intrinsic and extrinsic factors that improve safety and function in older adults seeking to age-in-place. First-hand experiences providing house calls to low income urban community-dwelling older adults brought this need to the forefront of the first author’s (Dr. Sarah Szanton) attention. Acting in response to the many older adults she had encountered who were struggling to age independently and safely, she found a program called ABLE (Advancing Better Living for Elders) that had already been proven effective in addressing similar challenges. ABLE had been previously evaluated through a randomized controlled trial of 306 older adults in Philadelphia. The program provided occupational and physical therapy sessions involving home modifications and training in their use; instruction in problem-solving strategies, energy conservation, safe performance of ADLS/IADLs and fall recovery techniques, as well as muscle and balance training. The evaluation of this model provided strong evidence a program focused on improving community-dwelling older adults’ function and control over their circumstances could help to promote aging with independence in these populations and even delay mortality.19,20 Dr. Szanton sought to build on the strengths of ABLE, while also modifying the intervention to address additional threats to aging with independence (such as perilous home environments and their interactions with underlying health issues) more explicitly. The result of these efforts was the CAPABLE (Community-Aging-in-Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders) intervention. CAPABLE augmented ABLE by adding support for actual repairs to unsafe home environments (as opposed to strictly home modifications such as grab bars and raised toilet seats) and a nurse who comprehensively assesses and addresses health concerns that could contribute to functional limitations within the home environment, such as pain, depression, medication reconciliation, and primary care provider (PCP) advocacy/communication. These realms were added in the service of increasing clients’ capacity to perform ADLs and IADLs independently. The CAPABLE intervention involves universal assessment of every client by an RN/OT team that then allows an interdisciplinary team including the client, the nurse, the occupational therapist, a home repair specialist (“handyman”), and a pharmacist to tailor an individualized plan of care that addresses potential threats to aging independence in the home environment while working towards functional goals set by the client themselves. Table 1 provides a description of the visits and their sequencing and the protocol and description of exactly what the nurse does in CAPABLE appears in an article by Pho, et al. 21

Table 1.

Home Visits and Collaboration with CAPABLE Clients over 4-month Period

Team Member OT Visit 1* OT Visit 2 After visit 2 Visit 3 Visit 4 Visit 5 Visit 6
Occupational Therapist (OT) and client together Introduction;

Function focused OT assessment. Fall risk and recovery education.
Determine client’s functional goals, conduct home safety assessment & identify necessary repairs or modifications Develop work order for home repairs/modifications & sends to HM. Brainstorm and develop action plan with client for client-identified goal #1 Brainstorm and develop action plan with client for client-identified goal #2 Brainstorm and develop action plan with client for identified goal #3;

Review HM work and train participant on new assistive devices
Wrap up, help participant generalize solutions for future problems;

Review goals and client’s achievement of them.
Handyman (HM) HM visits client’s home, Reviews repairs/modifications & associated costs with OT starts work and continues until complete
RN Visit 1 After RN visit 1 RN Visit 2 RN Visit 3 RN Visit 4
Registered Nurse (RN) and client together Introduction;
Function-focused RN assessment including pain, mood, strength, balance, medication information, Healthcare Provider (PCP) advocacy/ communication
Make medication calendar for client.
Review client’s medications including, side effects, interactions and possible changes.
Consult with pharmacist if on high-alert or more than 15 medications.
Determine goals in RN domain together, start to brainstorm goals.
Demonstrate CAPABLE exercises.
Review, clarify and modify medication calendar
Consider how to improve communication with PCP.
Develop correspondence to PCP.
Complete Brainstorming/ Problem-solving process. Develop Action Plans with client. Assess PCP response to communication of client needs. Review/assess/ trouble-shoot exercise regimen. Review progress and use of strategies for all target areas. Complete Action Plans. Review RN section of Flipbook that summarizes program. Evaluate achievement of goals and readiness to change scale.
*

The visits are staggered so that OT visits 1 and 2 occur before RN visit 1. RN only has 4 visits while the OT has 6.

In 2009–10, a randomized controlled pilot trial of CAPABLE was conducted with a sample of 40 low income older adults, randomly-assigned to receive the CAPABLE intervention. This pilot showed that those receiving CAPABLE improved on all primary outcomes, compared to a control group, and also had less difficulty with ADLs and IADLs, less pain, and improved falls efficacy.22 Based on those findings, the CAPABLE team was funded by the National Institutes of Health to conduct a 300 person randomized clinical trial assessing whether the intervention improves function, well-being, and health care costs on a larger scale. Also, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovations, created by the Affordable Care Act, funded the team to provide the CAPABLE intervention to 500 people and test whether the program did indeed delay nursing home admission and preventable hospital costs. Results from these trials will be available in 2015–2017. In the meantime, we have learned much about implementing such a program in the community and assessing what is working so far.

Three Innovations of the CAPABLE Model in Action: A Case Example

CAPABLE is innovative in three ways. First, it is not just client-centered but client-directed. Second, unlike most forms of home health care, the nurse and occupational therapist strive to address the functional goals of the client, not strictly their medical issues. Third, the CAPABLE model treats the home environment as a key influence on health, such that fixing up an older adults’ home interior is done for the primary purpose of achieving health-related goals. Here is a case that illustrates this three-pronged CAPABLE approach:

The Client

When first enrolled in CAPABLE, Mrs. R was a frail obese woman in her late sixties who suffered from debilitating pain and depressive symptoms, had difficulty managing her multiple medications, and lived in an unsafe home environment that put her at risk for falls. Although she described herself as a “people person”, functional limitations had limited her ability to go out for activities such as shopping, church, and family gatherings. As a result of lower extremity weakness, holes in her living room floors, kitchen flooring that was sticking up, and lack of environmental supports (railings and other home fixtures), she also had extreme difficulty doing things in her own home. She found difficulty in cooking for herself, going down to her basement, or up to her second floor.

The Client’s Functional Goals

Mrs. R expressed a desire to do more in her home, including cooking and improving her ability to access different levels of her house. Ultimately, she wanted to be able to leave the house for activities such as family events and church.

Issues Affecting Goal Achievement & Resulting Interventions

Assessment by the CAPABLE nurse/OT team revealed the following issues affecting Mrs. R’s safety and ability to achieve her functional goals: medication side effects, symptoms such as pain and low mood, lower extremity weakness, and unsafe walkways and stairways in the home. Working collaboratively with other members of the interdisciplinary team over a 4-month period, the CAPABLE nurse worked to address these issues in a manner tailored to Mrs. R’s unique circumstances and home environment.

  • Medication Side Effects: When she enrolled in CAPABLE, Mrs. R took both Celebrex 200mg twice a day and Motrin 200–400mg four times a day as needed for pain. In addition, Mrs. R had 3–4+ edema in her lower extremities. Upon noting the edema, the CAPABLE nurse reached out to Mrs. R.’s Primary Care Provider to suggest discontinuing the Celebrex. The nurse then suggested replacing the NSAIDS with Tylenol, Voltaren topical cream, and exercise.

  • Pain and Low Mood: Mrs. R’s depressive symptoms, in combination with her pain, were a barrier to many types of activity including standing long enough to cook for herself and socializing with others. Following the nursing intervention regarding her prescription to Celebrex, Mrs. R started Tylenol instead. She continued to take Motrin on occasion. Mrs. R stated that since her pain had decreased, her mood had improved. She began cooking for herself and her family, and began making trial runs to family gatherings, building towards her ultimate goal of attending church services.

  • Lower Extremity Weakness: Lack of strength in her lower extremities prevented Mrs. R from walking around as well as leaving her home. The RN taught Mrs. R a series of simple lower extremity exercises. On the first nursing visit, Mrs. R had so much difficulty demonstrating the exercises she had been taught (due to pain) that the CAPABLE nurse thought Mrs. R would not continue exercising on her own. However, the adjustments to Mrs. R’s medications, in addition to the exercise, started to make a difference. Mrs. R began exercising more regularly and asked the nurse for more advanced exercises on subsequent visits. She also started a walking routine inside the house after the handyman has fixed holes in her floors and the kitchen linoleum trip hazard.

  • Lack of Railings on Stairways: The lack of second railings on stairs to the basement and upper floor of the house constituted a serious fall risk for Mrs. R that impeded her from navigating her own home. The CAPABLE “handyman” installed second railings on both the stairs to the second floor and to the basement. Mrs. R reported that the second railing has made going up and down the steps much easier and safer. “You all have made my life easier. I was going up the steps on my hands and knees and coming down the steps sideways. I now have the two banisters where I can come down safely, facing forward holding onto both banisters.”

Value Added by the CAPABLE Approach

An older adult with Mrs. R’s risk profile would be likely to have been admitted to a hospital or a nursing home over time, due to her multi-morbidities, multiple medications, social isolation, and frail physical and emotional state.23 The CAPABLE team took an innovative approach to addressing these challenges by focusing on Mrs. R’s functional goals, rather than solely addressing medical issues. Taking their cues from Mrs. R, an interprofessional team consisting of a nurse, an occupational therapist, a pharmacist and a handyman designed a three-pronged combination of functional, medical, and environmental adjustments that worked synergistically over a 4-month period to meet Mrs. R’s unique needs within her home environment.

  • Innovation 1: Client-directed Care

    Mrs. R’s goals became the CAPABLE team’s goals and directed development of the plan of care. The team’s efforts to improve pain control, medication management, and strength/balance were in service of Mrs. R’s overall goals to cook for herself, get around and out of the house, and eventually to attend church services.

  • Innovation 2: Addressing Medical/Functional Issues through an RN/OT Team

    Relatedly, nursing assessment and related interventions were driven by functional (rather than strictly-medical) goals of the client and designed to complement and reinforce the activities of an occupational therapist. Working as an RN/OT team, in conjunction with other specialists such as the handyman and the pharmacist, the two types of clinicians were able to implement a plan of care that helped Mrs. R to meet her functional goals

  • Innovation 3: Treating Housing as Health

    The efforts of the RN/OT Team would not have been nearly as successful without the addition of important safety measures within Mrs. R’s home environment. Mrs. R. had many small alterations to her home that help her function there independently as well as get out to her important activities. In turn, these should help her health costs through increased activities and quality of life.

Through these efforts, the CAPABLE team sought to reverse the vicious cycle so many older adults with similar risk profiles as Mrs. R fall into of becoming increasingly deconditioned, depressed, and frail over time. The hope is that consequently, these actions will also decrease Mrs. R’s future risk for serious medical consequences, injury, or further functional declines that would require costly care.23

Lessons Learned While Implementing the CAPABLE Model

To date, implementation of the prior pilot RCT and larger on-going NIH- and CMS-funded clinical trials has taught the CAPABLE research team valuable lessons about improving unsafe home environments and supporting aging independence by applying a client-directed model of care, addressing both medical and functional issues using an interdisciplinary team approach, and incorporating home repair into health care.

  1. Lessons Learned about Client-Directed Care. In our experience, prioritizing the clients’ goals makes them likely to follow through. When clients say they are worried about Falls, and the CAPABLE nurse presents core strengthening exercises to help prevent falls, then the client is very likely to follow through on the exercises because they relate to her goal. Client-directed care can be hard at first for the RN to get used to as RNs are used to having medical goals and imparting them to the client. See Table 2 of lessons learned of how the CAPABLE RN role is different from home care RN.

  2. Lessons Learned about Addressing Medical & Functional Issues through Interdisciplinary Team. Similar to addressing the client’s goals, addressing their specific functional goals is the key to motivation. Clients are often not as concerned about their medical disease as they are about the ability to function. When we address both, it is a support for the client to be able to live with independence and dignity and leads to durable uptake of the new strategies. See Table 3 of recommendations to Nurses collaborating with Occupational Therapists.

  3. Lessons learned about Housing/Environment as Health. The changes to the home environment are durable and serve as visible reminders for clients to approach their daily function with their new CAPABLE approaches. After CAPABLE is over, if someone forgets to take their pain medications, they will still have repaired holes, taped down rugs, and study banisters to help them move around the home with increased function. Hopefully, these extrinsic changes work with their intrinsic changes and new problem-solving strategies to approach inevitable new issues as they age.

Table 2.

Role Differences Between the Traditional Home Health RN and the CAPABLE RN

Role Home Health RN CAPABLE RN
Goal-setting & Plan of Care Nurse-driven goal-setting & plan of care centered on the patient illness or injury as identified by the client’s Healthcare Provider. Client-driven goal-setting & plan of care centered on the functional goals & activities of interest identified by the client.
Collaboration with Client RN works as a treatment provider to the client for a specific medical problem as directed by the client’s Healthcare Provider.

RN-delivered treatments based on prescriptions from client’s Healthcare Provider.
RN serves as a consultant to the client for achieving their functional goals.

In partnership with the client, the RN helps to determine & shape the intervention by paying special attention to the clients’ preferences, pain, mood, medications, fall risk, and strength/balance.
Interdisciplinary Collaborations RN works apart from other specialists, but refers client to specialists and other services as needed (e.g. physical or occupational therapy, social work, etc.) RN works as an integral part of interdisciplinary team that includes the client, an Occupational Therapist, a Home Improvement Specialist, and a Pharmacist. RN refers client to social work services from local agencies as needed.
Provision of Skilled Nursing Care Skilled nursing care (e.g. physical assessment, phlebotomy, administration of IV medications, wound care, patient education) provided as prescribed by client’s Healthcare Provider. Skilled nursing care provided as needed to meet client-directed functional goals of care, in consultation with interdisciplinary team.
Client’s Healthcare Provider alerted to medical situations & to recommend adjustments to medications/therapies requiring a prescription.
Examples: orthostatic hypotension, foot wounds
Focus on Medications RN reconciles client’s medications with a general focus on side effects. Notifies client’s Healthcare Provider of significant interactions. Client education provided as needed. RN reconciles client’s medications with a specific focus on falls prevention & high alert medications. Notifies client’s Healthcare Provider of significant interactions. Additional activities include:
  • Creates medication calendar for client

  • Assesses for & advises client on issues related to medication adherence

  • Assesses medications with focus on lowering client costs

  • Works with Pharmacist in situations where client is on high-alert medications or >15 medications

Focus on Pain RN performs general assessment for pain & more specific assessments as directed by client’s illness or injury. Client education provided as needed. At each visit, RN performs thorough assessment for pain with a specific focus on how pain impacts client function & progress towards client-identified goals of care.
Based on assessment, RN provides client-specific education on pain identification, alleviation or prevention, and pharmacological & non-pharmacological approaches to pain management.
Duration of Care Home health services provided for up to 60 days per episode of care (as defined by Medicare ; RN visit frequency may vary CAPABLE intervention delivered over 4 months; RN sees client a maximum of 4 visits
Other Demands on RN RN may supervise other home health workers (licensed practical nurses or home health aides).
RN may be on-call nights, weekends, or holidays.
RN may regularly do extensive bending, lifting, or standing.
RN does not supervise other home health workers.
No need for RN coverage on nights, weekends, or holidays.
Limited amount of bending/lifting required only on occasion.

Table 3.

Recommendations to Nurses Collaborating with Occupational Therapists

Recommendation Application to CAPABLE Study Specific Example
  • Understand the Occupational Therapist’s (OT) scope of practice

When working with CAPABLE clients, nurses recognize the OT’s role in promoting client independence and function by:
  • Promoting clients own strategies to maintain and improve different areas of their life amplified with OT clinical knowledge.

  • Facilitating client’s access to & use of durable medical equipment and adaptive equipment, as appropriate

  • Prioritizing necessary modifications to client’s home environment

A client goal is fall prevention. In a typical CAPABLE plan of care, the OT brainstorms with the client safe ways to get into the bath and training on using new grab bars and railings inside or outside the house etc. The nurse complements but does not duplicate the OT role by focusing on client’s medications, nutrition, disease and symptom management – all of which can also lead to falls.
  • Maintain constant communication with the OT and other interdisciplinary team members

As in any other health care environment, open communication leads to better client outcomes and success.
Determine the personality and communication styles within the team and use appropriate communication strategies, as needed.
The nurse attends routine meetings of the interdisciplinary team and maintains regular communication with OTs (via phone, email, or face-to-face) to debrief following client visits and to discuss collaborative approaches to meeting emerging client needs and strengths.
  • Be aware of OT’s activities with clients and reinforce when appropriate

By maintaining excellent communication & familiarizing themselves with client goals and the plan of care (including activities of each of the interdisciplinary team members), the nurse reinforces OT activities/teaching when interacting with CAPABLE clients The nurse teaches balance and strength exercises. The OT works with a client to use assistive devices such as walkers or home modifications such as railings and grab bars. The OT reminds the client to perform the exercises. On subsequent visits, the nurse watches the clients use appropriate assistive devices/home modifications.

Conclusions

Aging with independence is important for older adults. Independence means not only living in one’s home but also being able to choose how to spend one’s days. Both of these rely on function, which is a product of the interaction of health and the environment. Drawing upon successful interventions and clinical experience, we developed an innovative program that: (1) allows clients to set their own goals; (2) involves an interdisciplinary team addressing issues of function and medical problems to help clients meet their goals; (3) treats the housing and the environment as an aspect of health care worthy of health care investment. We have shared the lessons we have learned in the project. If current testing is successful according to the actuaries at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid services, CAPABLE can be scaled up nationally through the Affordable Care Act. If this happens, the lessons learned and the resources we have developed will be important to explore in different contexts and States. We hope this program, designed to improve lives and independence, will also save health care costs for families and the nation.

Key Points.

  • Aging with independence benefits individuals, family and society but can be hard to achieve

  • Function is determined by both the person and the environment in which they maneuver.

  • We describe a promising program that intervenes with both older adults and their home environments to improve function.

  • This program, called CAPABLE, is funded through the Affordable Care Act and can be scaled up nationally if determined to be a success.

Footnotes

The authors have no financial conflicts to disclose.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Schwanen T, Ziegler F. Wellbeing, independence, and mobility: An introduction. Ageing and Society. 2011;31(5):719–733. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.US Census Bureau. [Accessed June 2013];American community survey, 2007–2011, detailed tables. 2013 www.socialexplorer.com/home.
  • 3.Green CR, Anderson KO, Baker TA, et al. The unequal burden of pain: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in pain. Pain Med. 2003;4(3):277–294. doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03034.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Minkler M, Fuller-Thomson E, Guralnik JM. Gradient of disability across the socioeconomic spectrum in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7):695–703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa044316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fuller-Thomson E, Nuru-Jeter A, Minkler M, Guralnik JM. Black-white disparities in disability among older Americans: Further untangling the role of race and socioeconomic status. J Aging Health. 2009;21(5):677–698. doi: 10.1177/0898264309338296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Szanton SL, Gill JM. Facilitating resilience using a society-to-cells framework: A theory of nursing essentials applied to research and practice. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2010;33(4):329–343. doi: 10.1097/ANS.0b013e3181fb2ea2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Roman CG, Chalfin A. Fear of walking outdoors. A multilevel ecologic analysis of crime and disorder. Am J Prev Med. 2008;34(4):306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Rauh VA, Landrigan PJ, Claudio L. Housing and health: Intersection of poverty and environmental exposures. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1136:276–288. doi: 10.1196/annals.1425.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Aneshensel CS, Wight RG, Miller-Martinez D, Botticello AL, Karlamangla AS, Seeman TE. Urban neighborhoods and depressive symptoms among older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. 2007;62(1):S52–S59. doi: 10.1093/geronb/62.1.s52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Warren-Findlow J. Weathering: Stress and heart disease in African American women living in Chicago. Qual Health Res. 2006;16(2):221–237. doi: 10.1177/1049732305278651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Martinez IL, Crooks D, Kim KS, Tanner E. Invisible civic engagement among older adults: Valuing the contributions of informal volunteering. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2011;26(1):23–37. doi: 10.1007/s10823-011-9137-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hinterlong JE. Productive engagement among older Americans: Prevalence, patterns, and implications for public policy. J Aging Soc Policy. 2008;20(2):141–164. doi: 10.1080/08959420801977491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kampfe CM, Wadsworth JS, Mamboleo GI, Schonbrun SL. Aging, disability, and employment. Work. 2008;31(3):337–344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hybels CF, Blazer DG, George LK, Koenig HG. The complex association between religious activities and functional limitations in older adults. Gerontologist. 2012;52(5):676–685. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Butrica BA, Johnson RW, Zedlewski SR. Volunteer dynamics of older Americans. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009;64(5):644–655. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbn042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Hu G, Baker SP. Recent increases in fatal and non-fatal injury among people aged 65 years and over in the USA. 2010;16:26–30. doi: 10.1136/ip.2009.023481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gill TM, Murphy TE, Gahbauer EA, Allore HG. Association of injurious falls with disability outcomes and nursing home admissions in community-living older persons. Am J Epidemiol. 2013 doi: 10.1093/aje/kws554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feinberg L, Reinhard SC. Valuing the invaluable: 2011 update. the growing contributions and costs of family caregiving. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gitlin LN, Hauck WW, Dennis MP, Winter L, Hodgson N, Schinfeld S. Long-term effect on mortality of a home intervention that reduces functional difficulties in older adults: Results from a randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(3):476–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02147.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gitlin LN, Winter L, Dennis MP, Corcoran M, Schinfeld S, Hauck WW. A randomized trial of a multicomponent home intervention to reduce functional difficulties in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):809–816. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00703.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pho AT, Tanner EK, Roth J, Greeley ME, Dorsey CD, Szanton SL. Nursing strategies for promoting and maintaining function among community-living older adults: The CAPABLE intervention. Geriatr Nurs. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2012.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Szanton SL, Thorpe RJ, Boyd C, et al. Community aging in place, advancing better living for elders: A bio-behavioral-environmental intervention to improve function and health-related quality of life in disabled older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(12):2314–2320. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2011.03698.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Woods NF, LaCroix AZ, Gray SL, et al. Frailty: Emergence and consequences in women aged 65 and older in the women’s health initiative observational study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(8):1321–1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES