Skip to main content
PMC home page
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2014 May 19;18(3):R101. doi: 10.1186/cc13877

Low plasma selenium concentrations in critically ill children: the interaction effect between inflammation and selenium deficiency

Simone Brasil de Oliveira Iglesias 1, Heitor Pons Leite 2,✉, Ângela Tavares Paes 3, Susyane Vieira de Oliveira 2, Roseli Oselka Saccardo Sarni 4
PMCID: PMC4075246  PMID: 24886623

Abstract

Introduction

Low plasma selenium concentrations are frequent in critically ill patients. However, whether this is due to systemic inflammation, a deficient nutritional state or both is still not clear. We aimed to determine the factors associated with low plasma selenium in critically ill children while considering the inflammatory response and nutritional status.

Method

A prospective study was conducted in 173 children (median age 34 months) with systemic inflammatory response who had plasma selenium concentrations assessed 48 hours after admission and on the 5th day of ICU stay. The normal reference range was 0.58 μmol/L to 1.6 μmol/L. The outcome variable was ‘low plasma selenium’, which was defined as plasma selenium values below the distribution median during this period. The main explanatory variables were age, malnutrition, sepsis, C-reactive protein (CRP), and clinical severity scores. The data were analyzed using a Binomial Generalized Estimating Equations model, which includes the correlation between admission and 5th day responses.

Results

Malnutrition and CRP were associated with low plasma selenium. The interaction effect between these two variables was significant. When CRP values were less than or equal to 40 mg/L, malnutrition was associated with low plasma selenium levels (odds ratio (OR) = 3.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.39 to 7.63, P = 0.007; OR = 2.98, 95% CI 1.26 to 7.06, P = 0.013; OR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.01 to 6.17, P = 0.049, for CRP = 10, 20 and 40 mg/L, respectively). This effect decreased as CRP concentrations increased and there was loose significance when CRP values were >40 mg/L. Similarly, the effect of CRP on low plasma selenium was significant for well-nourished patients (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.06 to 1.22, P <0.001) but not for the malnourished (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.99 to 1.08, P = 0.16).

Conclusions

There is a significant interaction between the magnitude of the inflammatory response and malnutrition on low plasma selenium. This interaction should be considered when interpreting plasma concentrations as an index of selenium status in patients with systemic inflammation as well as in the decision on selenium supplementation.

Introduction

Selenium plays an essential role in the protection against lipid peroxidation, in regulating T cell activity, mediating the inflammatory response and aiding thyroid hormone metabolism. The biological effects of selenium are achieved by 25 selenoproteins, among which the most known are selenoprotein P, the glutathione peroxidases, thioredoxin reductases and iodothyronine deiodinases [1]. Plasma selenium is predominantly associated with three proteins: selenoprotein P, which comprises over 50% of plasma selenium, glutathione peroxidase and albumin, which accounts for 20 to 40% and 9% of plasma selenium, respectively [2]. Plasma concentration reflects a very low part of body selenium as there is only 0.2 mg selenium in plasma for 20 to 40 mg in the whole body [3].

Decreased plasma concentrations during the acute phase response have been described in animal and clinical studies [4,5]. Plasma selenium is reportedly significantly lower in critically ill adult patients compared with healthy subjects [6-10] and is associated with oxidative stress, infectious complications, organ dysfunction and higher mortality [8,9,11,12]. However, in an international, randomized, blind trial conducted in patients with multiorgan failure, the North American patients did not show the low plasma selenium concentrations consistently observed in European and South American trials of selenium status in critically ill and healthy people. These differences were attributed to the depletion of selenium in soil observed in parts of Europe but not in North America [13]. There are few data about the natural abundance of selenium in Brazilian soils, as well as on the intake of selenium by the population. Evidence of low intake of selenium is reported in São Paulo, an area considered to have a selenium-deficient soil [14,15].

Low plasma selenium concentrations have also been reported in critically ill children [16-18]. However, the extent to which low plasma selenium concentrations reflect systemic inflammation, a selenium-deficient nutritional status or both is still not clear. The assessment of selenium nutritional status by biomarkers should ideally consider the high prevalence of malnutrition in ICUs [19,20] as well as a previous selenium deficiency. Correct analyses of these data are important for nutritional management of the critically ill patient. To date, there are no studies assessing the influence of malnutrition on selenium plasma concentrations in patients with systemic inflammation.

Based on the hypothesis that selenium plasma concentrations in children that are admitted to the ICU are reduced compared with normal standards, especially in malnourished patients, we sought to understand the risk factors that are associated with low plasma selenium concentrations in critically ill children while taking patient nutritional status and the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response into account.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted in a teaching hospital ICU with level I accreditation [21]. One hundred and seventy-three children who were admitted between July 2009 and May 2011 with systemic inflammatory responses were eligible for inclusion in the study. Neonates were excluded, as well as children with liver or kidney diseases; patients who were expected to be admitted for less than 24 hours, those with encephalic death, and readmissions were also excluded. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Federal University of São Paulo and written informed consent was obtained from the parents of each patient.

Nutritional therapy was performed according to the ICU protocol and was initiated after nutritional status assessment in the setting of hemodynamic stability. Patients were considered as hemodynamically stable if they were not hypotensive and did not require significant hemodynamic support including high-dose catecholamine agents, alone or in combination with large-volume fluid or blood product resuscitation to maintain cellular perfusion [22]. Feeding was preferably delivered by the enteral route. Energy requirements for the systemic inflammatory response acute phase were calculated according to the predicted basal metabolic rate, initially 50% of the total volume. The infusion rate increased every 12 to 24 hours, if tolerated, to reach 100% of total estimated volume by day two [23].

Variables

The outcome variable was ‘low plasma selenium’, which was defined as plasma selenium value below the distribution median. The following factors were considered to be exposure variables that could potentially affect the outcome: age, gender, nutritional status upon admission, diagnosis of severe sepsis/septic shock on admission, magnitude of the inflammatory response as measured by serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, albumin and lactate serum concentrations, clinical severity upon admission and organ dysfunction scores.

Laboratory analyses

Blood samples for plasma selenium, CRP, serum albumin, and lactate concentration analysis were obtained at an average time of 48 hours after admission and on the 5th day of ICU stay. Plasma selenium concentration was determined using graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry with Zeeman background correction. The normal reference range was 0.58 μmol/L to 1.6 μmol/L, which corresponded to the mean values proposed for the healthy pediatric population [24].

Serum CRP concentrations were assessed by turbidimetry [25] on the basis of a reference normality value ≤10 mg/L for acute-phase inflammatory responses. Serum albumin and lactate analyses were performed using the colorimetric method, with normal lactate concentrations defined as ≤2 mMol/L.

Nutritional status assessment

For nutritional status classification, the anthropometric indicators weight for age (W/A), height for age (H/A) and body mass index (BMI) were compared against the World Health Organization 2006 growth standards [26]. For children younger than 2 years, we used the W/A or H/A whereas the BMI was used for children older than 2 years of age. Patients with an anthropometric index z score below –2 were considered malnourished. Calculations were performed using the World Health Organization Anthroplus software (version 1.0.2; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland).

Clinical assessment

Clinical severity scores on admission were assessed according to the Revised Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM 2) [27]. The Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score (PELOD) [28] score was used to assess multiple organ dysfunction severity on the day of admission. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, severe sepsis, and septic shock were defined according to pediatric consensus terminology [29]. ICU-free days were defined as days not needing ICU care in the first 28 days after admission. Subjects who did not survive to day 28 or who stayed in the ICU for 28 days or more were assigned zero ICU-free days. Ventilator-free days were defined as the number of days alive and breathing without assistance from admission to day 28. Subjects who did not survive to day 28 were assigned zero ventilator-free days [30].

Statistical analysis

Categorical data were summarized using frequencies and percentages, and normally distributed or non-normal quantitative data were summarized using means and standard deviations or median and interquartile range. Laboratory parameters observed on admission and on the 5th day of ICU stay were compared using a paired t test and the Wilcoxon test.

Two approaches were used to evaluate the effect of explanatory variables on the outcome: first, using only admission values and second, with the two measurements (admission and 5th day). In the first approach, logistic regression models were fitted. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models with binomial distribution were used in the second approach, because they take the dependence observed between two values within a patient into account. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed in both approaches. Variables with a P <0.10 in the univariate models were selected for the multivariate model. The interaction terms among variables, which remained in the final models, were investigated. The significance level was set to 0.05. Intercooled Stata 10.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA) software was used to perform the analysis.

Results

The main patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Blood samples were collected from all patients on admission and from 99 of these patients who remained in the ICU until day 5. Median plasma selenium concentration at admission was 0.29 μmol/L (interquartile range 0.18 to 0.38 μmol/L); values below the lower limit of normal (0.58 μmol/L) were observed in 90.7% (157/173) of patients. Other laboratory values at admission were as follows: the median CRP concentration was 45.1 mg/L (interquartile range 12.5 to 111.9 mg/L), albumin (mean ± SD) was 3.12 ± 0.67 g/dL and median lactate was 1.0 mMol/L (interquartile range 0.8 to 1.6 mMol/L). CRP concentrations decreased from admission to 5th day while the other variables remained relatively constant (Table 2). Selenium concentrations persisted below normal levels in 82 of the 99 patients who remained in the ICU until day 5. The mean daily intake of selenium was 6.8 μg (range 0 to 48.7 μg) and only six patients achieved the Estimated Average Requirement or Adequate Intake for selenium during the study period. In a multivariate model adjusted for age and CRP, selenium intake was not related to a decreased risk of low plasma selenium on day 5

Table 1.

Main clinic and demographic characteristics of the patients at admission (n = 173)

Variable Values
Age* (months)
 34 (9-90)
Male gender - n (%)
 106 (61)
Nutritional status - n (%)
  
 Well nourished
 90 (52.0)
 Malnourished
 80 (46.3)
 Obese/overweight
 3 (1.7)
 Mortality n (%)
 11 (6.3)
 PIM 2* 3.68
(1.32 – 8.78)
 PELOD (on admission)*
 11 (2-12)
 ICU-free days (days)*
 21 (15-24)
 Length of hospital stay (days)*
 15 (10-27)
 Ventilator-free days (days)*
 24 (20-27)
Diagnostic groups - n (%)
  
 Surgical
 77 (44.5)
  Cardiovascular
 36 (46.7)
  Gastrointestinal
 13 (17)
  Neurological
 11 (14.2)
  Miscellaneous
 17 (22.1)
 Medical
 96 (55.5)
  Respiratory
 70 (73)
  Cardiovascular
 7 (7.2)
  Gastrointestinal
 7 (7.2)
  Neurological
 8 (8.4)
  Endocrine/Metabolic 4 (4.2)
Open in a new tab

*Data expressed as median and interquartile range. PIM 2, revised Pediatric Index of Mortality; PELOD, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score.

Table 2.

Comparative analysis between laboratory parameters on admission and on the 5 th day of ICU stay - patients with at least 5 days of ICU stay (n = 99)

 
 Day of assessment
  
Variables Admission 5th day P value
Selenium* (μmol/L)
 0.30 (0.15-0.39)
 0.32 (0.20-0.49)
 <0.001w
CRP* (mg/L)
 49.3 (18.8-112.9)
 29.4 (7.0-73.5)
 <0.001w
Lactate* (mMol/L)
 1.0 (0.8-1.5)
 1.0 (0.7-1.4)
 0.21w
Albumin** (g/dL) 3.0 ± 0.61 3.29 ± 0.53 <0.001t
Open in a new tab

*Data expressed as median and interquartile range; **data expressed as the mean and standard deviation; WWilcoxon test; tpaired t test. CRP, C-reactive protein.

The outcome ‘low plasma selenium’, defined by plasma selenium concentration below the distribution median (≤0.29 μmol/L on admission and ≤0.32 μmol/L on the 5th day of ICU stay, respectively) was analyzed at the two time points (admission and hospitalization day 5).

Low plasma selenium on admission

Univariate and multivariate analyses of exposure variables for low plasma selenium at admission are demonstrated in Table 3. Malnutrition and CRP concentrations on admission were statistically associated with the final model outcome.

Table 3.

Effect of exposure variables on low plasma selenium on admission

 
 Univariate analysis
 Multivariate analysis
Variables OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Male gender
 0.70 (0.38-1.29)
 0.25
 -
 -
Age (months)
 0.99 (0.99-1.00)
 0.50
 -
 -
PELOD
 1.02 (0.98-1.07)
 0.25
 -
 -
PIM 2
 1.01 (0.99-1.04)
 0.24
 -
 -
Surgical
 1.07 (0.59-1.05)
 0.82
 -
  
Sepsis/septic shock
 2.48 (0.62-9.93)
 0.199
 -
 -
Malnutrition
 2.39 (1.30-4.41)
 0.005
 2.05 (1.07-3.90)
 0.03
CRP (x 10 mg/dL)
 1.08 (1.03-1.12)
 0.001
 1.06 (1.01-1.11)
 0.025
Albumin (g/dL)
 0.63 (0.39-0.99)
 0.048
 0.88 (0.55-1.49)
 0.65
Lactate (mMol/L) 1.00 (0.98-1.03) 0.73 - -
Open in a new tab

Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses (n = 173). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PELOD, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score; PIM 2, revised Pediatric Index of Mortality; CRP, C-reactive protein.

To better understand the interference of malnutrition and CRP on low plasma selenium, the interaction between these variables was studied and demonstrated to be statistically significant (P = 0.035). Interaction between variables is present when the effect of one predictor variable on the outcome varies according to the other independent variable. In our study, the significant interaction suggests that the effect of malnutrition on the outcome (low plasma selenium) depends on CRP concentration and the effect of CRP on the outcome depends on whether the child is malnourished or not. This result will be described in detail in the analysis of the two time points (admission and on day 5).

Low plasma selenium at the two time points (admission and hospitalization day 5)

Univariate and multivariate analyses of exposure variables for low plasma selenium on admission and day 5 are demonstrated in Table 4. The results are very close to those that were found in the low plasma selenium on admission analysis (Table 3). CRP values on admission and malnutrition were significantly associated with low plasma selenium for both evaluation time points.

Table 4.

Effect of exposure variables on low plasma selenium (admission and day 5)

 
 Univariate analysis
 Multivariate analysis
Variables OR (CI 95%) P value OR (CI 95%) P value
Male gender
 0.69 (0.39-1.21)
 0.19
 -
 -
Age (months)
 1.00 (0.99-1.00)
 0.11
 -
 -
PELOD
 1.03 (0.99-1.07)
 0.16
 -
 -
PIM 2
 1.17 (0.67-2.04)
 0.58
 -
 -
Surgical
 1.07 (0.61-1.86)
 0.82
 -
  
Sepsis/septic shock
 1.44 (0.43-4.89)
 0.55
 -
 -
Malnutrition
 2.04 (1.15-3.62)
 0.005
 1.88 (1.05-3.39)
 0.035
CRP on admission (x 10 mg/L)
 1.08 (1.04-1.13)
 <0.001
 1.06 (1.02-1.11)
 0.007
Albumin (g/dL)
 0.59 (0.38-0.92)
 0.018
 0.88 (0.53-1.43)
 0.58
Lactate (mMol/L) 1.00 (0.98-1.02) 0.89 - -
Open in a new tab

Results of the generalized estimating equations models (GEE). OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PELOD, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score; PIM 2, revised Pediatric Index of Mortality; CRP, C-reactive protein.

Such as for the analysis of the outcome on admission, there was a significant interaction between CRP concentrations and malnutrition (P = 0.03). To better evaluate this result, estimates of the effects of these two variables on patient outcome are presented in Table 5. The effect of CRP concentrations on low plasma selenium was significant in well-nourished (P <0.001) but not in malnourished patients (P = 0.16). The effect of malnutrition on low plasma selenium also decreased according to the CRP concentration increase and was no longer significant from values >40 mg/L (Figure 1). This cutoff value for CRP derived from the statistical interaction between CRP values and malnutrition.

Table 5.

Effects of CRP concentrations and malnutrition on low plasma selenium

Effects OR 95% CI P
Effect of CRP (x 10 mg/L)
  
  
  
 Well-nourished patients
 1.13
 1.06-1.22
 <0.001
 Malnourished patients
 1.03
 0.99-1.08
 0.16
Effect of malnutrition*
  
  
  
 Patients with 10 mg/L CRP
 3.25
 1.39-7.63
 0.007
 Patients with 20 mg/L CRP
 2.97
 1.255-7.06
 0.013
 Patients with 40 mg/L CRP
 2.49
 1.01-6.17
 0.049
 Patients with 60 mg/L CRP
 2.09
 0.79-5.53
 0.14
 Patients with 80 mg/L CRP 1.74 0.60-5.07 0.31
Open in a new tab

*Comparison between malnourished and well-nourished patients regarding the chance of low plasma selenium concentrations; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; CPR, C-reactive protein.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Effect of malnutrition on low plasma selenium concentrations (odds ratio) according to CRP values during the study period. The solid line represents the odds ratio; dotted lines represent the 95% confidence interval limits. CRP, C-reactive protein.

Discussion

Plasma selenium concentrations were below the normal range in most patients during the study period. Because infants have a high metabolic rate and faster growth, they are expected to represent a high-risk age group for deficiency. Since there are no reference values for plasma selenium in normal Brazilian children, the reference recommended by the laboratory were adopted in our study. The reference values for plasma selenium concentrations must be adjusted for age because serum selenium concentrations in childhood show a significant age dependency [24]. We found three studies in the literature that evaluated plasma selenium levels during the systemic inflammatory response in children that had been admitted to the ICU [16-18]. Plasma selenium concentrations were below the reference values in up to 82% of patients, but no studies considered patient nutritional status and the magnitude of the inflammatory response.

We did not find correlation between plasma selenium and severity of illness indices. In another pediatric study, weak correlations were found between these variables, suggesting that other factors may affect plasma selenium and severity of illness [18].

Plasma concentration analysis is the most commonly used method for selenium determination [31]. However, plasma concentrations of some micronutrients may be affected by systemic inflammation, which may confound the low plasma concentrations, which indicate deficiency [32,33]. The main factor responsible for reduced plasma concentrations during the systemic inflammatory response is, hypothetically, selenium redistribution from the circulation to tissues that are involved in immune function. Endothelial injury results in increased vascular permeability favoring transcapillary escape of selenium transporter proteins [34]. In addition to ischemia-induced local acidosis which causes selenoprotein P binding to the activated endothelium [35,36], acute losses through biological fluids, dialysis, and low intake contribute to low plasma selenium concentrations in critically ill patients [11]. The molecular mechanisms that lead to reduced serum selenium during the acute phase response have been studied in animal models. In a study in mice, the authors demonstrated that genes essential for selenium metabolism are downregulated as part of the acute-phase response and impair regular selenoprotein P biosynthesis by hepatocytes [37]. Experimental data also indicate that kinetics of plasma selenium during the early stages of systemic inflammation are quite similar in mammals [4,5,37,38]. Very early decreases in plasma selenium concentrations have been reported after an endotoxemia-induced acute response in rats [5] and in an ovine model of septic shock [38]. In a study to evaluate the time-dependent changes in plasma trace elements in rats following burn injury, plasma selenium decreased six hours post injury with no detectable changes in tissue selenoenzymes activity [4], suggesting evidence in favor of a conserved tissue selenoenzymes activity during acute inflammation.

Apart from the systemic inflammatory response, selenium deficiency should be understood as a true low selenium status with decreased tissue selenoenzyme activity [39] and that this deficiency leads to low plasma selenium concentration, as well as low selenoprotein P or glutathione peroxidase [40,41]. In addition, considering that selenium content in plasma is a very small part of body selenium content (0.5 to 1%) one cannot deduce from a low plasma selenium concentration a low tissue selenoenzyme activity and thus a true selenium deficiency [3].

Serial serum CRP concentration monitoring may be useful to provide a more accurate interpretation of plasma selenium concentration as a nutritional deficiency indicator. In a recent cross-sectional study on a large blood sample from adult patients with various types of medical conditions, selenium and other micronutrient plasma concentrations decreased with inflammatory response intensity as assessed by CRP. The authors suggested plasma micronutrient concentrations can only be clinically interpreted with knowledge of the degree of inflammatory response. According to their results, plasma selenium concentration assessment would be feasible if CRP values were lower than 10 mg/L [42]. Given that these were the results of routine micronutrient screens that were extracted from the laboratory database, patient clinical and nutritional status was not considered. The studies in which nutritional status was considered a risk factor for low plasma selenium concentrations were all performed in kwashiorkor[43], HIV [44,45] and tuberculosis [46] patients, which is different from the children that were admitted to the ICU.We evaluated plasma selenium concentrations in critically ill children taking the magnitude of inflammatory response and nutritional status, among other variables, into account. Both factors were associated with increased low plasma selenium concentration risk. As represented in Figure 1, the effect of malnutrition on low plasma selenium concentrations depended on CRP values. When CRP values were less than or equal to 40 mg/L, malnutrition significantly increased the chance of low plasma selenium. With values higher than 40 mg/L, the magnitude of the inflammatory response prevailed over malnutrition, which ceased to be significantly associated with the outcome. Similarly, there was a significant affect of CRP concentrations on low plasma selenium in well-nourished patients but not in the malnourished. Malnutrition must be considered when understanding low plasma selenium concentrations, especially in patients in which the inflammatory response is not as severe. In this context, malnutrition somewhat reduced the importance of CRP concentrations on low plasma selenium risk. Therefore, one must consider both factors - the magnitude of the inflammatory response as well as nutritional status when interpreting plasma selenium concentrations in patients under metabolic stress.

Study limitations

The main limitation of this study was defining the low plasma selenium outcome variable based on the median study sample selenium value. In our study, the definition of the median as a cutoff was adopted because, similar to other adult and child studies [6-10,16-18], plasma selenium concentrations were below the lower limit in most patients. This factor coupled with the high prevalence of malnutrition in our ICU plus the evidence of selenium deficiency in some areas of Brazil [14,15], should be considered when generalizing these results to other units with different profile. In addition, the relation between malnutrition and selenium deficiency should be nuanced. Although multiple micronutrient deficiencies are inherent in malnutrition, selenium deficiency may occur without visible protein-energy malnutrition depending on the selenium content of the food. Hence, the link between malnutrition and nutritional selenium deficiency depends on the selenium content of the soil and food [47] and on the type of malnutrition.

It is well established that selenium is an essential micronutrient for antioxidant defenses that has reduced plasma concentrations during a systemic inflammatory response. However, the benefit of selenium supplementation in all critically ill patients is still not proven. Meta-analyses have shown that high-dose selenium might have beneficial effects in patients with sepsis syndrome, but there are significant heterogeneity of protocols, patients and outcomes in the different trials [10,48-51].

The results of our study show that low plasma concentrations are not necessarily indicative of systemic inflammation only, but may also reflect nutritional deficiency. Low plasma selenium concentrations in malnourished patients may be an indication for supplementation, whereas this does not necessarily mean that all patients with low plasma selenium should be supplemented. Importantly, an interpretation that considers only plasma selenium concentrations and omits nutritional status may have implications for nutritional therapy in patients undergoing a systemic inflammatory response. Although there are no reports of adverse effects of selenium supplementation for a short period of time in critically ill patients, it is worth considering that high selenium compound concentrations are toxic and that sodium selenite may also act as an oxidant molecule [3,34,52,53]. Adjusted hazard ratios for serum selenium-induced all-cause mortality among US adults have demonstrated that whereas additional selenium intake may benefit people with low plasma selenium concentrations, those with adequate to high concentrations might be affected adversely and should not be supplemented [1,52]. Supplementation with doses around or below the tolerable upper intake (UL for adults is 400 μg/day) should be sufficient to correct previous selenium deficiency in critically ill patients [34,54].

Conclusions

In this study, we have shown that the magnitude of the inflammatory response and malnutrition are associated with low plasma selenium in children admitted to the ICU. There is a significant interaction between these two factors on plasma selenium concentrations. This interaction should be considered when interpreting plasma concentrations as an index of selenium status in patients with systemic inflammation as well as in the decision on selenium supplementation.

Key messages

• There is an interaction between the magnitude of the inflammatory response and malnutrition on low plasma selenium concentrations in critically ill children. Interaction between variables is present when the effect of one predictor variable on the outcome varies according to the other independent variable.

• The effect of malnutrition on low plasma selenium depends on CRP concentrations. At CRP values less than or equal to 40 mg/L malnutrition increased the chance of low plasma selenium. This effect decreased according to the CRP concentration increase and was no longer significant from values >40 mg/L. In turn, the effect of CRP concentrations on low plasma selenium depends on whether the child is malnourished or not. This effect was significant in well-nourished but not in malnourished patients.

• The interaction between CRP and malnutrition should be considered when interpreting plasma concentrations as an index of selenium status in patients with systemic inflammation as well as in the decision on selenium supplementation.

Abbreviations

BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; CRP: C-reactive protein; GEE: generalized estimating equations; H/A: height for age; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus; ICU: intensive care unit; OR: odds ratio; PELOD: Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score; PIM 2: revised Pediatric Index of Mortality; W/A: weight for age.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

The authors’ responsibilities were as follows: SBO participated in the study design, data acquisition and in the manuscript writing and review; HPL planned and designed the study design, participated in the statistical analysis, manuscript writing and review; ATP participated in the statistical analysis and interpretation of data and review; SVO participated in the study design, data acquisition and review, ROS participated in the interpretation of data, manuscript writing and review. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Contributor Information

Simone Brasil de Oliveira Iglesias, Email: brasiglesiasp@uol.com.br.

Heitor Pons Leite, Email: heitorpons@gmail.com.

Ângela Tavares Paes, Email: atpaes@unifesp.br.

Susyane Vieira de Oliveira, Email: oliveirasv@hotmail.com.

Roseli Oselka Saccardo Sarni, Email: rssarni@uol.com.br.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grant number 08/57185-4, Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil. The funding sources had no influence on the study design; in collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

  1. Rayman MP. Selenium and human health. Lancet. 2012;379:1256–1268. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61452-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harrison I, Littlejohn D, Fell GS. Distribution of selenium in human blood plasma and serum. Analyst. 1996;121:189–194. doi: 10.1039/an9962100189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Forceville X. The effect of selenium therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis syndrome: simple selenium supplementation or real (5 H2O) · Na2SeO3 pharmacological effect? Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1591–1592. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31829106e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Agay D, Anderson RA, Sandre C, Bryden NA, Alonso A, Roussel AM, Chancerelle Y. Alterations of antioxidant trace elements (Zn, Se, Cu) and related metallo-enzymes in plasma and tissues following burn injury in rats. Burns. 2005;31:366–371. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2004.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Maehira F, Luyo GA, Miyagi I, Oshiro M, Yamane N, Kuba M, Nakazato Y. Alterations of serum selenium concentrations in the acute phase of pathological conditions. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;316:137–146. doi: 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00744-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Forceville X, Vitoux D, Gauzit R, Combes A, Lahilaire P, Chappuis P. Selenium, systemic immune response syndrome, sepsis, and outcome in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1536–1544. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199809000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Forceville X, Mostert V, Pierantoni A, Vitoux D, Le Toumelin P, Plouvier E, Dehoux M, Thuillier F, Combes A. Selenoprotein P, rather than glutathione peroxidase, as a potential marker of septic shock and related syndromes. Eur Surg Res. 2009;43:338–347. doi: 10.1159/000239763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Manzanares W, Biestro A, Galusso F, Torre MH, Mañay N, Pittini G, Facchin G, Hardy G. Serum selenium and glutathione peroxidase-3 activity: biomarkers of systemic inflammation in the critically ill? Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:882–889. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1356-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Sakr Y, Reinhart K, Bloos F, Marx G, Russwurm S, Bauer M, Brunkhorst F. Time course and relationship between plasma selenium concentrations, systemic inflammatory response, sepsis, and multiorgan failure. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:775–784. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Alhazzani W, Jacobi J, Sindi A, Hartog C, Reinhart K, Kokkoris S, Gerlach H, Andrews P, Drabek T, Manzanares W, Cook DJ, Jaeschke RZ. The effect of selenium therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:1555–1564. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31828a24c6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Berger MM, Chiolero RL. Antioxidant supplementation in sepsis and systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:S584–S590. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000279189.81529.C4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Stoppe C, Schälte G, Rossaint R, Coburn M, Graf B, Spillner J, Marx G, Rex S. The intraoperative decrease of selenium is associated with the postoperative development of multiorgan dysfunction in cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1879–1885. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182190d48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Heyland D, Muscedere J, Wischmeyer PE, Cook D, Jones G, Albert M, Elke G, Berger MM, Day AG. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. A randomized trial of glutamine and antioxidants in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1489–1497. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1212722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Moraes MF, Welch RM, Nutti MR, Carvalho JRV, Watanabe E. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Selenium in the Environment and Human Health, University of Science and Technology of China Press. 1. Suzhou. Hefei; 2009. Evidences of selenium deficiency in Brazil: from soil to human nutrition; pp. 73–74. [Google Scholar]
  15. Karita K, Hamada GS, Tsugane S. Comparison of selenium status between Japanese living in Tokyo and Japanese Brazilians in São Paulo, Brazil. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2001;10:197–199. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.2001.00262.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Börner J, Zimmermann T, Albrecht S, Roesner D. [Selenium administration in children with SIRS] Med Klin (Munich) 1999;94:93–96. doi: 10.1007/BF03042203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dylewski ML, Bender JC, Smith AM, Prelack K, Lydon M, Weber JM, Sheridan RL. The selenium status of pediatric patients with burn injuries. J Trauma. 2010;69:584–588. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e74c54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heidemann SM, Holubkov R, Meert KL, Dean JM, Berger J, Bell M, Anand KJ, Zimmerman J, Newth CJ, Harrison R, Willson DF, Nicholson C, Carcillo J. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Collaborative Pediatric Critical Care Research Network (CPCCRN). Baseline serum concentrations of zinc, selenium, and prolactin in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:e202–e206. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e31827200f5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Cahill N, Wang M, Day A, Duggan CP, Heyland DK. Nutritional practices and their relationship to clinical outcomes in critically ill children - an international multicenter cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2204–2211. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e18a8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. de Souza Menezes F, Leite HP, Koch Nogueira PC. Malnutrition as an independent predictor of clinical outcome in critically ill children. Nutrition. 2012;28:267–270. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2011.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rosenberg DI, Moss MM. American College of Critical Care Medicine of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines and levels of care for pediatric intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:2117–2127. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000142704.36378.E9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L, Cresci G. A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors; American College of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2009;33:277–316. doi: 10.1177/0148607109335234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. de Oliveira Iglesias SB, Leite HP, Santana e Meneses JF, de Carvalho WB. Enteral nutrition in critically ill children: are prescription and delivery according to their energy requirements? Nutr Clin Pract. 2007;22:233–239. doi: 10.1177/0115426507022002233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Muntau AC, Streiter M, Kappler M, Roscher AA. R children: are prescription and deSchramel P. Age-related reference values for serum selenium concentrations in infants and children. Clin Chem. 2002;48:555–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Otsuji S, Shibata H, Umeda M. Turbidimetric immunoassay of serum C-reactive protein. Clin Chem. 1982;28:2121–2124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. World Health Organization. The WHO child growth standards. [cited 2013 April 15]. Available from: http://www.who.int/childgrowth/en.
  27. Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G. Paediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) Study Group. PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality. Intensive Care Med. 2003;29:278–285. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1601-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Leteurtre S, Martinot A, Duhamel A, Proulx F, Grandbastien B, Cotting J, Gottesman R, Joffe A, Pfenninger J, Hubert P, Lacroix J, Leclerc F. Validation of the paediatric logistic organ dysfunction (PELOD) score: prospective, observational, multicentre study. Lancet. 2003;362:192–197. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13908-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005;6:2–8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schoenfeld DA, Bernard GR. ARDS Network. Statistical evaluation of ventilator-free days as an efficacy measure in clinical trials of treatments for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2002;30:1772–1777. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200208000-00016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ashton K, Hooper L, Harvey LJ, Hurst R, Casgrain A, Fairweather-Tait SJ. Methods of assessment of selenium status in humans: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:2025S–2039S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.27230F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Oakes EJ, Lyon TD, Duncan A, Gray A, Talwar D, O'Reilly DS. Acute inflammatory response does not affect erythrocyte concentrations of copper, zinc and selenium. Clin Nutr. 2008;27:115–120. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2007.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Shenkin. Selenium in intravenous nutrition. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:S61–S69. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vincent JL, Forceville X. Critically elucidating the role of selenium. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2008;21:148–154. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e3282f49afe. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Brigelius-Flohi R, Banning A, Schnurr K. Selenium-dependent enzymes in endothelial cell function. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2003;5:205–215. doi: 10.1089/152308603764816569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Bar-Or D, Garrett RE. Is low plasma selenium concentration a true reflection of selenium deficiency and redox status in critically ill patients? Crit Care Med. 2011;39:2000–2001. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31821caf55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Renko K, Hofmann PJ, Stoedter M, Hollenbach B, Behrends T, Köhrle J, Schweizer U, Schomburg L. Down-regulation of the hepatic selenoprotein biosynthesis machinery impairs selenium metabolism during the acute phase response in mice. FASEB J. 2009;23:1758–1765. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-119370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Wang Z, Forceville X, Van Antwerpen P, Piagnerelli M, Ahishakiye D, Macours P, De Backer D, Neve J, Vincent JL. A large-bolus injection, but not continuous infusion of sodium selenite improves outcome in peritonitis. Shock. 2009;32:140–146. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e318193c35d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Stefanowicz FA, Talwar D, O'Reilly DS, Dickinson N, Atkinson J, Hursthouse AS, Rankin J, Duncan A. Erythrocyte selenium concentration as a marker of selenium status. Clin Nutr. 2013;32:837–842. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.01.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Persson-Moschos M, Huang W, Srikumar TS, Akesson B, Lindeberg S. Selenoprotein P in serum as a biochemical marker of selenium status. Analyst. 1995;120:833–836. doi: 10.1039/an9952000833. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Persson-Moschos M. Selenpoprotein P. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2000;57:1836–1845. doi: 10.1007/PL00000665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Duncan A, Talwar D, McMillan DC, Stefanowicz F, O'Reilly DS. Quantitative data on the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response and its effect on micronutrient status based on plasma measurements. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95:64–71. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.023812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Manar MJ, MacPherson GD, Mcardle F, Jackson MJ, Hart CA. Selenium status, kwashiorkor and congestive heart failure. Acta Paediatr. 2001;90:950–952. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2001.tb02464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Mohd NM, Yeo J, Huang MS, Kamarul AM, Koh MT, Khor GL. Nutritional status of children living with HIV and receiving antiretroviral (ARV) medication in the Klang Valley, Malaysia. Malays J Nutr. 2011;17:19–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Schaaf HS, Cilliers K, Willemse M, Labadarios D, Kidd M, Donald PR. Nutritional status and its response to treatment of children, with and without HIV infection, hospitalized for the management of tuberculosis. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2012;32:74–81. doi: 10.1179/2046905512Y.0000000008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. van Lettow M, Harries AD, Kumwenda JJ, Zijlstra EE, Clark TD, Taha TE, Semba RD. Micronutrient malnutrition and wasting in adults with pulmonary tuberculosis with and without HIV co-infection in Malawi. BMC Infect Dis. 2004;4:61–68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-4-61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Xia Y, Hill KE, Byrne DW, Xu J, Burk RF. Effectiveness of selenium supplements in a low-selenium area of China. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81:829–834. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/81.4.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wernerman J. Micronutrients against oxidative stress - time for clinical recommendations? Crit Care. 2012;16:124. doi: 10.1186/cc11319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Huang TS, Shyu YC, Chen HY, Lin LM, Lo CY, Yuan SS, Chen PJ. Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Manzanares W, Dhaliwal R, Jiang X, Murch L, Heyland DK. Antioxidant micronutrients in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2012;12;16:R66. doi: 10.1186/cc11316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Landucci F, Mancinelli P, De Gaudio AR, Virgili G. Selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2014;9:150–156. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Renwick AG, Dragsted LO, Fletcher RJ, Flynn A, Scott JM, Tuijtelaars S, Wildemann T. Minimising the population risk of micronutrient deficiency and over-consumption: a new approach using selenium as an example. Eur J Nutr. 2008;47:17–25. doi: 10.1007/s00394-007-0691-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Bleys J, Navas-Acien A, Guallar E. Serum selenium levels and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular mortality among US adults. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:404–410. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Andrews PJ, Avenell A, Noble DW, Campbell MK, Croal BL, Simpson WG, Vale LD, Battison CG, Jenkinson DJ, Cook JA. Scottish Intensive care Glutamine or Selenium Evaluative Trial Trials Group. Randomised trial of glutamine, selenium, or both, to supplement parenteral nutrition for critically ill patients. BMJ. 2011;342:d1542. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES