Skip to main content
BMC Genomics logoLink to BMC Genomics
. 2014 Apr 2;15(Suppl 2):P31. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-S2-P31

Impact of World Health Organization (WHO) new standards on the referral pattern of infertile men for assisted reproduction

Saad Alshahrani 1,2, Ashok Agarwal 1,3,, Mourad Assidi 3,4, Adel M Abuzenadah 3,4, Damayanthi Durairajanayagam 1,5, Ahmet Ayaz 1, Rakesh Sharma 1
PMCID: PMC4075603

Background

New reference values for semen parameters are significantly lower in the WHO 5th edition (2010) than in the 4th edition [1,2]. Some of the highlights of the fifth edition were: 1) subjects included in this edition had < 12 months’ time to pregnancy, 2) semen analyses results were pooled and analyzed for reference values, 3) laboratories generating the data used standardized methods for semen analysis according to WHO manual available at the time of original studies and 4) one-sided lower reference limits (5th centile) were generated and proposed as lower cut-off limits for normal values. The new reference values were aimed at providing evidence-based thresholds to assist clinicians in calculating relative fertility of the patient. The goal of our study was to examine the impact of the new WHO reference values on the referral pattern of infertile men referred for assisted reproduction (IUI, IVF/ICSI).

Materials and methods

In this study, we examined the medical records of 362 infertile, non-azoospermic men referred to the Andrology laboratory between 2011 and 2012. Patients were divided into 2 groups; Group A: patients evaluated in 2011 by the WHO 4th edition (n = 200) [1] and Group B: patients evaluated in 2012 by the WHO 5th edition (n = 162) [2]. All patients were examined for conventional semen parameters including sperm morphology. The number of total referrals for IUI or IVF/ICSI was recorded. ART outcomes were not evaluated in this study.

Results

A significant decline in the number of IVF/ICSI referrals was seen (71.5% vs. 53.1%; P<0.05) as well as the number of patients with abnormal sperm morphology declined significantly (76.5% vs. 30.9%; P<0.05) with the introduction of new reference values for semen analysis (WHO 5th edition). In cases referred for ART, abnormal sperm morphology was documented in 107 patients in Group A (74.8%) versus 23 (26.7%) in Group B.

Table 1.

New WHO sperm morphology cutoff and its impact on IUI/ART referrals

Parameter Group A (WHO 4th Edition) Group B (WHO 5th Edition)
n % n %

Number of patients 200 100 162 100

WHO Abnormal Sperm Morphology 153 76.5 50 30.9a

New referral for IUI/IVF/ICSI 143 71.5 86 53.1a

IUI 94 65.7 60 70

IVF/ ICSI 49 34.3 26 30a

WHO Abnormal Sperm Morphology among IUI or IVF/ICSI Referrals 107 74.8 23 26.7a

aP <0.05 was considered significant by chi-square test

Conclusions

Reporting of semen parameters based on the new WHO criteria may significantly impact the management of infertile men since more men will be categorized as normal and fewer of them will be referred for ART. This will result in many men postponing additional evaluations or seeking further treatment.

References

  1. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. Fourth. Cambridge University Press; 1999. [Google Scholar]
  2. World Health Organization. WHO laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. Fifth. Geneva, Switzerland; http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/infertility/9789241547789/en/ [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMC Genomics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES