Skip to main content
Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine logoLink to Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine
. 2013 Spring;3(2):178–185.

Hypolipidemic and antioxidative effects of curcumin on blood parameters, humoral immunity, and jejunum histology in Hy-line hens

Javad Arshami 1,*, Mohammad Pilevar 1, Mohammad Aami Azghadi 1, Ahmad Reza Raji 2
PMCID: PMC4075704  PMID: 25050272

Abstract

Objective: Turmeric (Curcuma Longa Linn) is a medicinal plant that contains curcumin. There is a growing interest in using curcumin powder (CP) as feed additives for antioxidative and antimicrobial properties to improve human health. This study was conducted to determine the appropriate levels of CP on blood parameters, immunity, and histology of jejunum in hens.

Materials and Methods: A total of 200, 58-wk-old Hy-line hens were randomly distributed into 4 treatments (0%, 0.5%, 1.5%, and 2.5% CP or 0, 5, 15, and 25 g/kg feed, respectively) with 5 replicates (10 birds each) for 8 weeks using the completely randomized design. Blood samples were taken from 2 birds per replicate at weeks 61 and 65 to evaluate blood parameters. On weeks 63 and 65, two birds from each replicate received 0.5 ml SRBC (25%) injection in breast muscle and 7 days later, blood samples were collected to evaluate total Ig, IgG, and IgM titers in serum. Two hens were sacrificed at week 65 for the histological study of jejunum.

Results: Curcumin reduced triglycerides at 1.5% and 2.5% and cholesterol and LDL at 2.5% (p<0.05). Improvement of total Ig and IgG titers after the 1st and 2nd injections were observed. Muscle thickness in jejunum increased (p<0.05) at 1.5% curcumin and the length and surface area of villus were enhanced as well.

Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that curcumin can be used as an antioxidant at 1.5% and antilipidemic agent at 2.5% in diet.

Key Words: Curcumin, Humoral Immunity, Hypolipidemic Agent, Jejunum Histology

Introduction

Turmeric (Curcuma Longa Linn.) is a medicinal plant that contains curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin (Wuthi-Udomler et al., 2000), and tetrahydrocurcuminoids (Osawa et al., 1995), which are the active ingredients. Beneficial effects of curcumin in human and animal nutrition may include stimulation of body metabolism (Srinivasan, 2005), improvement of endogenous digestive enzyme secretion (Platel and Srinivasan, 2000), activation of immune response (Antony et al., 1999), antibacterial and antiviral (Singh et al., 2010), antioxidant (Toda et al., 1985), anti-Alzheimer’s disease (Park and Kim, 2002), anticancer (Kuttan et al., 1985), and anthelminthic actions (Gomez et al., 2002). The curcumin extract was found to have immunomodulatory and antioxidative activities in mice (Antony et al., 1999; Iqbal et al., 2003). Moreover, curcumin had greater impacts on preventing free radical damage compared with vitamin C, vitamin E, and superoxide dismutase (Toda et al., 1985).

A recent study provided the first immunological evidence that dietary supplementation of curcumin enhances local innate immunity and induces higher protective immunity against E. tenella infection (Lee et al., 2009). A recent study showed that curcumin has protective effects against AFB1-induced toxicity by modulating red and white blood cell counts and Hb percentage to some extent (Sharma et al., 2011; Gowda et al., 2008). Animals fed with a high dose of curcumin (3 g/kg body weight) did not show any significant adverse effects (Shankar et al., 1980). It has been stated that 1.5 g curcumin per person per day can be used as a pain relief or wound healing medicin (Sharma et al., 2005). The potent anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritis effects of curcumin volatile oil on joint damage has been compared with cortisone and phenylbutazone (Chandra and Gupta, 1972). However, these medicines are associated with toxicity in bone and blood, whereas curcumin has no side effects.

An earlier study showed that 0.5 g curcumin prominently enhanced the activity of intestinal lipase (80%), amylase (96%), and trypsin (154%) which play an important role in digestion and absorption of food (Platel and Srinivasan, 2000; Srinvasan, 2005). At present, curcumin is being used in human and animal diets to promote immunity and health status. However, as up to now, the most effective level has not been determined. Therefore, in this study, we used higher levels of curcumin to specify the hypolipidemic and antioxidative effects on blood parameters, humoral immunity, and jejunum histology in hens.

Materials and methods

Animals and treatments

This experiment was conducted at poultry research farm according to the rules and guidelines approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of College of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. A total of 200 Hy-line, W-36 laying hens were allotted to 4 treatments with 5 replicates (50 birds/treatment, 10 birds/replicate) using the completely randomized design. The Curcumin powder (CP) was purchased from local market (ZAMEN Co. INC, Mashhad, Iran). The birds recieved a basal diet (control) or a basal diet containing 5, 15, and 25 g curcumin powder/kg feed (0.5%, 1.5%, and 2.5%, respectively) for 8 weeks (58-65 wk old). The birds were housed in cages under similar condition receiving ad libitum feed and water.

Blood parameters

Blood samples (1 mL/bird) were taken from the brachial vein into heparinzed tubes from 40 randomly selected birds (2 birds/replicate, 10 birds/treatment) at 61 and 65 weeks of age. Plasma was obtained from blood samples by centrifugation (10 min at 3000 rpm) and stored at -20 ºC. The frozen plasma was allowed to thaw at 22 ºC prior to analysis. Plasma total protein, albumin, creatine kinase, triglyceride, cholesterol, LDH, glucose, phosphorus, and calcium were determined by autoanalyzer (Technicon RA1000, Bayer Diagnostics, Puteaux, France) using available commercial kits (Pars Azmun Co. INC, Tehran, Iran).

Humoral immune respons

The SRBC (sheep red blood cell) test was performed in order to assay the specific antibody (Ab) titer. To evaluate the Ab responses, 2 birds/treatment were randomly selected and inoculated with SRBC (25% suspension in PBS, 0.5 mL/bird in both left and right breast muscle) at the end of weeks 63 and 65. One week after 1st and 2nd inoculations (weeks 64 and 66), 0.5 mL blood samples were collected from the main brachial vein using a 2 mL syringe with a 22-gauge needle and were placed into heparinized tubes to evaluate the primary and secondary Ab responses. The sera were inactivated by heat at 56 °C for 30 min. The total and mercaptoethanol-resistant (IgG) Ab titers against SRBC were determined by agglutination (Cheema et al., 2003).

The serum (50 µL) was added to 50 µL PBS in the first column in a 96-well v-shaped bottom plate (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and the solution was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. A serial of dilutions were prepared as 1:2 and 50 µL SRBC (2%) suspension was added to each well. The plates were read on a microplate reader at 650 nm to evaluate the total immunoglobin (Ig) titer, 30 min after incubation at 37 °C. Immediately, the well with a distinct SRBC bottom was considered as the end-point of the titer for agglutination. In addition to evaluate IgG titer, 50 µL 2-mercaptoethanol (0.01 M) in PBS was used and then followed the previous procedure. The difference between total Ig and IgG titers was considered as IgM titer. Anti-SRBC titers were measured and expressed as log2 of the reciprocal of the last dilution after complete agglutination (Pilevar et al., 2011).

Tissue sampling and section preparation

At the end of study, 2 birds from each treatment were sacrificed for histology of jejunum. The tissue samples (2 cm) were taken from the midpoint between the point of entry of the bile duct and Meckel's diverticulum in jejunum (Awad et al., 2005a).

The segments were flushed by 0.9% saline and fixed in 10% formaldehyde buffer solution for 48 hr. The tissue processing consisted of serial dehydration (soaked samples were rinsed 3 times in absolute alcohol), imbedding, and fixing in paraffin. Tissue sections were harvested from 5 mm pieces with 5 μm thickness (fine three cross-sections from each sample) by microtome, fixed on slides and stained with Gill’s hematoxylin and eosin (Arshami and Ruttle, 1988). Eight sections per sample were utilized for a histopathological study using an image analyzer (Nikon Cosmozone 1S, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Measurement of villus parameters and intestinal layer thicknesses

The images were analyzed using the stereological image software, Cast Image System (Version 2.3.1.3). The villus length (VL) was measured from the villus tip to the bottom, not including the intestinal crypt. A total of 16 villi per section were measured in each replicate and four VL were averaged as the mean of villus length. Similarly, the crypt depth (CD) from the crypt-villus junction to the base of the crypt, VL/CD and villus width (VW) at mid-villus height were measured. The villus surface (VS) and the villus surface area (VSA) were calculated using the villus number (VN) in 100 μm2 and the following formulas (Sakamoto et al., 2000):

VS = (2π) × (VW/2) × (VL) and VSA = VN (in 100 μm2) × VS

The villus is assummed a cylindrical shape that its surface area (a rectangular) can be calculated by multiplying length of villus (VL) and circumference of villus base (2πR). The R is radius of villus base and equal to half of villus width (VW/2). The thickness of the lamina propria (LPT) and the muscle layer thickness (MLT) in the jejunum wall were measured accordingly.

Statistical analysis

The data obtained is shown in mean±SD. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and for post-hoc comparisons, Duncan’s multiple range test was applyed. The significant level was reported at 5%.

Results

Blood parameters

The results of blood parameters are presented in Table 1. The levels of triglycerides, cholesterol, and LDL decreased by increasing curcumin doses (p<0.05). However, the levels of glucose, total protein, and albumin decreased slightly as the curcumin level increased. The curcumin failed to affect on creatin kinase, calcium, and phosphorous during different weeks.

Table 1.

Effects of different levels of curcumin powder (CP) on blood parameters in hens

Treatments 1 1 2 3 4 SEM p-value
Triglyceride mg/dL 97a 83.5ab 81.7b 79.9b 3.47 0.017
Cholesterol mg/dL 126.55a 108.12ab 103.36ab 96.01b 5.84 0.018
LDH U/L 243a 219.7ab 189.7ab 173.7b 15.95 0.041
Glucose mg/dL 201.37 188.03 185.02 170.84 13.14 0.465
Protein Total g/L 2.82 2.35 2.02 2.72 0.25 0.130
Albumin g/L 3.5 3.00 2.87 3.02 0.32 0.571
Creatine Kinase U/L 417.15 378.0 391.5 428.28 41.03 0.813
Calcium mg/dL 10.4 10.67 10.00 10.49 0.72 0.926
Phosphorous mg/dL 6.78 6.89 6.66 7.01 0.05 0.964
1

Treatments were included: 1=0.0% CP, 2=0.5% CP, 3=1.5% CP, and 4=2.5% CP or 5, 15, and 25 g curcumin powder/kg feed, respectively.

ab

Means with different superscripts in a row are significantly different (p<0.05).

Anti-SRBC titers

The results of immune responses during the 1st and 2nd injections are shown in Table 2. The overall results showed no significant differences between treatments but the anti-SRBC titers were higher in the 2nd inoculation compared with the 1st one. The total anti-SRBC titers were highest at the 0.5% and 1.5% curcumin in the 2nd inoculation. The IgG titers were highest at the 1.5% curcumin in the 1st and 2nd inoculations. The IgM titers increased in all treatments at the 1st inoculation but in the 2nd inoculation, the 0.5% and 1.5% curcumin increased IgM with the highest for 0.5%.

Table 2.

Effects of different levels of curcumin powder (CP) on antibody titres at 7 days after 1st and 2nd SRBC injections in hens

  Seven days after 1 st injection
Seven days after 2 nd injection
Treatments 1 Total anti-SRBC IgG IgM Total anti-SRBC IgG IgM
1 9.1 7.3 1.8 9.8 7.8 2.0
2 9.0 6.8 2.2 10.1 6.7 3.4
3 9.7 7.7 2.0 10.7 8.5 2.2
4 9.0 6.9 2.1 9.0 7.3 1.7
SEM 0.58 0.55 0.45 0.65 0.73 0.5
p-value 0.799 0.655 0.935 0.353 0.388 0.135
1

Treatments were included: 1=0.0% CP, 2=0.5% CP, 3=1.5% CP, and 4=2.5% CP or 5, 15, and 25 g curcumin powder/kg feed, respectively.

Villus parameters and intestinal layers

The results of villus parameters and intestinal layer thicknesses are presented in Table 3.

Table 3.

Effects of different levels of curcumin powder (CP) on villus and jejunum layer parameters in hens

Treatments 1 Villus length (µm) Villus width (µm) Villus surface area (µm 2 ) Crypt depth (µm) Lamina properia (µm) Muscularis thickness (µm)
1 848.89 149.44 394565 164.42 45.29 227.18b
2 835.89 125.14 331738 185.15 41.53 236.1ab
3 922.09 136.34 396246 165.96 42.74 322.82a
4 716.91 148.71 382019 151.65 45.61 257.35ab
SEM 114.57 17.00 65090 14.87 2.96 21.85
p-value 0.657 0.715 0.883 0.487 0.724 0.036
1

Treatments were included: 1=0.0% CP, 2=0.5% CP, 3=1.5% CP, and 4=2.5% CP or 5, 15, and 25 g curcumin powder/kg feed, respectively.

ab

Means with different superscripts in a column are significantly different (p<0.05).

The overall inclusion showed no significant improvement in villus parameters except slight increase in the villus length and villus surface area at 1.5% curcumin. The 1.5% curcumin increased the muscle layer thickness (p<0.05), whereas the 0.5% and 2.5% curcumin showed slight increase compared with the control group.

Discussion

Curcumin powder is a yellowish spice known to possess antimicrobial and antioxidative properties. In this study, statistical analysis of data showed different effects of curcumin on blood parameters, anti-SRBC titer, and histomorphology of jejunum in hens. Animal studies documented the antioxidative and hypolipidemic effects of curcumin on lipid metabolism, especially anti-hypercholesterolemia.

Our results showed reduction of cholesterol, triglycerides, and LDL, having negative trend with treatments (p<0.05). Similarly, the graded curcumin powder (0.05 to 0.20%) significantly decreased serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, and LDL but increased HDL in laying hens at 104 weeks of age (Kermanshahi and Riasi, 2006). Moreover, it has been reported that hens (28 wk) fed curcumin at 1.0% significantly decreased yolk total lipid by 13.95% (Radwan et al., 2008). However, recent study showed a significant reduction of triglycerides with no effects on other lipid parameters in subjects treated with curcuminoids (1 g/day) (Mohammadi et al., 2012). This discrepancy with our study and others may explain the variation among the experimental units or the source of curcumin. The significant reduction of serum lipids are clearly indicated the hypolipidemic effects of curcumin which is dose-dependent.

In our study, we observed slight reduction of total protein, albumin, and glucose with increasing curcumin dose. However, it has been reported that curcumin exhibits hypoglycemic effects in type 2 diabetic mice and diabetic albino rats, (Nishiyama et al., 2005; Arun and Nalini, 2002). Moreover, another study showed that curcumin can modulate the glucose level in diebetic subjects (Srinivasan, 1972). Thus, accoding to our study and other reports, curumin can reduce and regulate blood sugar level in healthy and diebetic subjects.

In this study, we assessed the immunomodulatory properties of curcumin in hens during weeks 58-65 of age (Table 2). We found no significant differences between treatments, but the anti-SRBC titers were higher in the 2nd inoculation compared with the 1st one with the highest for 0.5% and 1.5% curcumin. This finding indicated that curcumin slowly built up the immune system to respond to inoculation after the 2nd injection. However, it has been reported that different levels of curcumin powder (0.25 to 0.75%) significantly increased IgA, IgM, and IgG titers but decreased the ratio of monocytes in broilers at 42 days of age (Emadi and Kermanshahi, 2007). In our study, the IgG titer was the highest at 1.5% curcumin and the IgM titers increased in all treatments at the 1st and 2nd inoculations with the highest for 1.5%. Similarly, another study found that dietary curcumin at 40 mg/kg enhanced IgG titer in rats (). Moreover, it has been reported that feeding 1 g of curcumin/kg to mice increased mucosal CD4+T cells and B cells in the intestine, indicating that curcumin can modulate lymphocyte mediated immune functions (). However, adding curcumin (90 or 135 ppm and 180 ppm) to the broiler diets reduced H:L at 28 and 42 days of age respectively (p<0.05) with no significant effect on NDV titer (Kijparkorn and Angkanaporn, 2003). In our study, some improvements were observed in humoral immunity, which was dose-dependent.

In general, improving digestion and absorption depends on the stimulation of appetite, feed intake, improvement of endogenous digestive enzyme secretion, and activation of intestinal layers and villi. Adding curcumin to diet may provide sufficient improvement through morphological changes of intestinal layers and villi in jejunum to maintain growth and development. It is suggested that the stabilizing effect on intestinal morphology may be associated with intermediate nutrient metabolism (Jamroz et al., 2003). The overall inclusion of histology in this study showed various effects by treatments (Table 3). The 1.5% curcumin increased the thickness of muscle layers (p<0.05). The 1.5% treatment also increased villus length and villus surface area as well. The lamina properia thickness and crypt depth increased in 2.5% and 0.5% curcumin, respectively. The digestive activity of curcumin is perhaps mediated via improvement of layers and villus characteristics in jejunum.

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to appreciate the research council of Poultry Research Center of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM) for financial support of this study, Mashhad, 91775-1163, IRAN.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Antony S, Kuttan R, Kutta G. Immunomodulatory activity of curcumin. Immunol. Invest. 1999;28:291–303. doi: 10.3109/08820139909062263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arshami J, Ruttle JL. Effects of diets containing gossypol on spermatogenic tissues of young bulls. Theriogenol. 1988;30:507–516. doi: 10.1016/0093-691x(88)90200-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arun N, Nalini N. Efficacy of turmeric on blood sugar and polyol pathway in diabetic albino rats. Plant Food Hum Nut. 2002;57:41–52. doi: 10.1023/a:1013106527829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Awad WA, Bohm J, Razzazi-Fazeli E, Zentek J. In vitro effects of deoxynivalenol on electrical properties of intestinal mucosa of laying hens. Poult Sci. 2005a;84:921–927. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.6.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chandra D, Gupta SS. Anti-inflammatory and anti-arthritic activity of volatile oil of Curcumalonga (Haldi) Indian J Med Res. 1972;60:138–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cheema MA, Qureshi MA, Havenstein GB A comparison of the immune response of a 2001 commercial broiler with a 1957 randombred broiler strain when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult Sci. 2003;82:1519–1529. doi: 10.1093/ps/82.10.1519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Churchill M, Chadburn A, Bilinski RT, Bertagnolli MM. Inhibition of intestinal tumours by curcumin is associated with changes in the intestinal immune cell profile. J Surg Res. 2000;89:169–175. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2000.5826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Emadi M, Kermanshahi H. Effect of turmeric rhizome powder on activity of some blood enzymes in broiler chickens. Int J Poult Sci. 2007;6:48–51. [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomez DC, Alegrio LV, Leon LL, Lima ME. Total synthesis and anti-leishmanial activity of some curcumin analogues. Arzneimittel-Forsch. 2002;52:695–698. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gowda NKS, Ledoux DR, Rottinghaus GE, Bermudez AJ, Chen YC. Efficacy of turmeric (Curcuma longa), containing a known level of curcumin, and a hydrated sodium calcium aluminosilicate to ameliorate the adverse effects of aflatoxin in broiler chicks. Poult Sci. 2008;87:1125–1130. doi: 10.3382/ps.2007-00313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Iqbal M, Sharma SD, Okazaki Y, Fujisawa M, Okada S. Dietary supplementation of curcumin enhances antioxidant and phase II metabolizing enzymes in ddy male mice: possible role in protection against chemical carcinogenesis and toxicity. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;92:33–38. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0773.2003.920106.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jamroz D, Orda J, Kamel C, Williczkiewicz A, Wertelecki T, Skorupin’Ska J The influence of phytogenic extracts on performance, nutrients digestibility, carcass characteristic, and gut microbial status in broiler chickens. J Anim Feed Sci. 2003;12:583–596. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kermanshahi H, Riasi A. Effect of turmeric rhizome powder (Curcuma longa) and soluble NSP degrading enzyme on some blood parameters of laying hens. Int J Poult Sci. 2006;5:494–498. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kijparkorn S, Angkanaporn K. Effect of turmeric (Curcuma Longa Linn.) as an antioxidant on immune status and growth performances of stressed broilers. M.Sc. Thesis. The Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Veterinary Science; 2003. [Google Scholar]
  15. Kuttan R, Bhanumathy P, Nirmala K, George MC. Potential anticancer activity of turmeric (Curcuma longa) Cancer Lett. 1985;29:197–202. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(85)90159-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee S-H, Jang S, Kim D, Park M, Ionescu C, Bravo D, Lillehoj H. Effect of dietary cinnamomum cassia and curcuma longa on Eimeria tenella infection in broiler chickens. Poult Sci Assoc, 98th Annual Meeting; Poult Sci Assoc; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mohammadi A, Sahebkar A, Iranshahi M, Amini M, Khojasteh R, Ghayour-Mobarhan M, Ferns GA. Effects of supplementation with curcuminoids on dyslipidemia in obese patients: A randomized crossover trial. Phytother Res. 2012;26 (11) doi: 10.1002/ptr.4715. ISSN 0951-418X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nishiyama T, Mae T, Kishida H, Tsukagawa M, Mimaki Y, Kuroda M, Sashida Y, Takahashi K, Kawada T, Nakagawa K, Kitahara M. Curcuminoids and sesquiterpenoids in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) suppress an increase in blood glucose level in type 2 diabetic KK-Ay mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:959–963. doi: 10.1021/jf0483873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Osawa T, Sugiyama Y, Inayoshi M, Kawakisi S. Antioxidative activity of tetrahydrocurcuminoids. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1995;59:1609–1612. doi: 10.1271/bbb.59.1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Park SY, Kim DS. Discovery of natural products from Curcuma longa that protect cells from Beta-amyloid Insult: a drug discovery effort against Alzheimer's disease. J Nat Prod. 2002;65:1227–1231. doi: 10.1021/np010039x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pilevar M, Arshami J, Golian A, Basami MR. Effects of dietary n-6: n-3 ratio on immune and reproductive systems of pullet chicks. Poult Sci. 2011;90:1758–1766. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-01152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Platel K, Srinivasan K. Influence of dietary spices and their active principles on pancreatic digestive enzymes in albino rats. Nahrung. 2000;44:42–46. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3803(20000101)44:1<42::AID-FOOD42>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Radwan NL, Hassan RA, Qota EM, Fayek HM. Effect of natural antioxidant on oxidative stability of eggs and productive and reproductive performance of laying hens. Int J Poult Sci. 2008;7:134–150. [Google Scholar]
  24. Sakamoto T, Danzmann RG, Gharbi K, Howard P, Ozaki A, Kean Khoo S, Woram RA, Okamoto N, Ferguson MM, Holm LE, Guyomard R, Hoyheim B. A microsatellite linkage map of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) characterized by large sex-specific differences in recombination rates. Genetics. 2000;155:1331–1345. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Shankar TNB, Shantha NV, Ramesh HP. Toxicity studies on turmeric (Curcuma longa): Acute toxicity studies in rats, guinea pigs & monkeys. Indian J Exp Biol. 1980;18:73–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharma RA, Gescher AJ, Stewart WP. Curcumin: the story so far. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1955–1968. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Sharma V, Sharma C, Sharma S. Influence of Curcuma Longa and Curcumin on blood profile in mice subjected to aflatoxin B1. Int J Pharma Sci Res. 2011;2:1740–1745. [Google Scholar]
  28. Singh RK, Rai D, Yadav D, Bhargava A, Balzarini J, Clercq ED. Synthesis, antibacterial and antiviral properties of curcumin bioconjugates bearing dipeptide, fatty acids and folic acid. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45:1078–1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.12.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. South EH, Exon JH, Hendrix K. Dietary curcumin enhances antibody response in rats. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 1997;19:105–119. doi: 10.3109/08923979709038536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Srinivasan K. Spices as influencers of body metabolism: an overview of three decades of research. Food Res Int. 2005;38:77–86. [Google Scholar]
  31. Srinivasan , M Effect of curcumin on blood sugar as seen in a diabetic subject. Indian J Med Sci. 1972;26:269–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Toda S, Miyase T, Arichi H, Tanizawa H, Takino Y. Natural antioxidant III. Antioxidative components isolated from rhizome of Curcumalonga L. Chem and Pharma Bull. 1985;33:1725–1728. doi: 10.1248/cpb.33.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wuthi-Udomler M, Grisanapan W, Luanratana O, Caichompoo W. Anti-fungal activities of plant extracts. South East Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000;31 (Suppl, 1):178–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine are provided here courtesy of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES