Abstract
Background
There are few reports on the relationship of blood pressure with cognitive function in maintenance dialysis patients.
Methods
The Cognition and Dialysis Study is an ongoing investigation of cognitive function and its risk factors in 6 Boston area hemodialysis units. In this analysis we evaluated the relationship between different domains of cognitive function with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure, and intradialytic changes in systolic blood pressure, using univariate and multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, race, education and primary cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD).
Results
Among 314 participants, mean age was 63 years; 47% were female, 22% African American and 48% had diabetes. Mean (SD) of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and intradialytic change in systolic blood pressure were 141 (21), 73 (12), 68 (15) and -10 (24) mm Hg, respectively. In univariate analyses, the performance on cognitive tests primarily assessing executive function and processing speeds was worse among participants with lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure. These relationships were not statistically significant, however, in multivariable analyses. There was no association between cognitive function and systolic blood pressure or intradialytic change in systolic blood pressure in either univariate or multivariable analyses.
Conclusion
We found no association between different measures of blood pressure and cognitive function in cross sectional analysis. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm these results.
Keywords: Blood pressure, Cognition, Dialysis
Introduction
There has been increased recognition that cognitive impairment is common in dialysis patients1-3 and is associated with adverse outcomes, including decreased compliance with medications, increased hospitalizations and mortality.2, 4 In the general population, both high and low blood pressure are associated with cognitive impairment and dementia.5-10 High blood pressure may promote cognitive impairment via both small and large vessel cerebrovascular disease, while low blood pressure may lead to hypoperfusion of the brain, particularly in the setting of preexisting vascular disease.6 However, there are few studies evaluating the relationship of blood pressure to cognitive function in hemodialysis patients.
Hypertension is highly prevalent in dialysis patients, and higher blood pressure has been associated with increased risk of left ventricular hypertrophy and stroke.11-13 However, low blood pressure has been associated with all cause mortality in dialysis patients14, 15 and with stroke during the earlier stages of CKD.16 Recent studies also suggest that pulse pressure and intradialytic systolic hypertension may be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in hemodialysis patients.17-19 Therefore, we evaluated the relationship of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and intradialytic changes in systolic blood pressure with detailed measures of cognitive function in a cohort of maintenance hemodialysis patients recruited to evaluate risk factors for cognitive impairment.
Methods
Participants
Outpatients receiving chronic in-center hemodialysis at five Dialysis Clinic Inc. (DCI) units and one hospital based unit (St. Elizabeth's Medical Center) in the greater Boston area were screened for the Cognition and Dialysis Study. Reflecting the nature of the cognitive battery, eligibility criteria included English fluency, as well as sufficient visual and hearing acuity to complete cognitive testing. To minimize cognitive testing floor effects and reflecting inability to provide consent, individuals with MMSE ≤ 10 and/or advanced dementia based on medical record review were excluded. Non-access related hospitalization within 1 month, receipt of hemodialysis for less than 1 month, and single pool Kt/V <1.0 were also temporary exclusion criteria. The Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University Institutional Review Board approved the study and all participants completing detailed cognitive testing signed informed consent and research authorization forms.
Cognitive Function
Subjects were administered a battery of cognitive tests during one dialysis session by research assistants trained by a neuropsychologist (TS) to assure quality and inter-rater reliability. All testing was completed within the first hour of hemodialysis treatment to reduce the impact of fatigue. Reassessment of research assistants by the study neuropsychologist with either mock testing sessions or witnessed testing of study participants occurred at 3-6 month intervals. The neuropsychological battery included well validated and commonly used cognitive tests that possess high inter- and intra-rater reliability and have established age, sex, and education-matched normative scores. Tests included the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)20 the North American Adult Reading Test (NAART),21 the Wechsler Memory Scale-III (WMS-III) Word List Learning subtest,22 the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III (WAIS-III) Block Design and Digit Symbol-Coding subtests,22 and Trail Making Tests A and B23 (Table 1). The overall battery assesses a broad range of cognitive functioning including global ability, verbal intelligence, supraspan learning, auditory retention, visual retention, attention/mental processing speed, visual construction/fluid reasoning, and motor speed. Depressive symptoms were assessed using the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression (CESD) Scale, with depression indicated by a CESD score ≥ 16; a value consistent with the presence of major depression in the general population.24
Table 1.
Components of the neuropsychiatric battery in the Cognition study
Cognitive Test | Function Assessed | Scoring | Test Details |
---|---|---|---|
Mini-Mental State Exam | Cognitive Screen | Number Correct | Thirty-point questionnaire that samples abilities such as arithmetic, memory, and orientation. |
North American Adult Reading Test | Intelligence | 128.7 -(0.89 * # of pronunciation errors) | Estimation of verbal intelligence quotient that requires subjects to read a list of 61 words out loud. |
Immediate Recall* | Supraspan Learning & retention of information | Total initially correct | A test of memory in which a list of 12 words is presented during 4 trials, and retention of these words is tested after a delay of 25 to 35 minutes. Calculated scores include immediate recall (which is the sum of words recalled during the 4 trials), percent retention [(delayed recall / trial 4 of immediate recall) x 100], and delayed recognition. |
Percent Retention* | Percent recall after delay | ||
Delayed Recognition* | Number of correctly identified words | ||
Block DesignΛ | Visual Construction & Fluid Reasoning | Number completed weighted for time | Subjects are required to reproduce depicted patterns using a set of colored blocks. |
Digit Symbol-CodingΛ | Attention, Mental Processing Speed, & Executive Function | Number of copied symbols in 2 minutes | Symbols are decoded by matching a given symbol to a digit provided in an answer key. |
Trail Making Test A | Time to Completion | "Connect-the-dots" for a consecutive number sequence from 1 to 25. | |
Trail Making Test B | Time to Completion | "Connect-the-dots" alternating between numbers (1 to 13) and letters (A to L). |
Derived from the Word List Learning subtest of the Wechsler Memory Scale - III (WMS-III)
From the Weschler adult intelligence scale
Blood Pressures
Monthly average pre-dialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressures were used. The pulse pressure was calculated using the difference between mean monthly pre-dialysis systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Intradialytic blood pressure change was calculated as post-dialysis systolic blood pressure minus pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure.
Statistical Analysis
Baseline characteristics of eligible dialysis patients who consented and did not consent to participate were compared using chi-square tests, t-tests and ANOVA as appropriate. Similarly, baseline characteristic of participants enrolled in the study by quartiles of systolic blood pressure were compared. The primary analyses used linear regression to explore the association of systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse pressure and intradialytic blood pressure change with performance on individual cognitive tests, with the raw test scores serving as the dependent variables. The measures of blood pressure were modeled linearly, with parameter estimates (β coefficients) calculated per 1 standard deviation increase in the continuous predictors. In order to explore nonlinear relationships we also modeled both quartiles and continuous quadratic forms of blood pressure measures with cognitive function. Analyses where performance on the Trails B test was the outcome used Tobit regression, censoring for failure to complete the task within 5 minutes.25 All models adjusted for age, sex, race, education and primary cause of ESRD. All analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Results were considered statistically significant at a p-value of less than 0.05. No correction was made for multiple testing given the hypothesis generating nature of the analyses.
Results
Among 929 patients screened, 414 were ineligible for complete cognitive testing. Reasons included language barriers (n=194, 47%), behavioral and psychiatric issues (n=14, 3%), physical impediments such as blindness, hearing loss, and paralysis (n=62, 15%), recent acute hospitalization or impending death (n=108, 26%), and advanced dementia (n=36, 9%). Of the remaining 515, 314 individuals consented to and underwent detailed cognitive testing. The mean (SD) age of study participants was 63 (16) years; 47% were female, 22% African American, 48% had diabetes and median (25th-75th percentile) of dialysis vintage was 14 (7-35) months (Table 2). Patients with higher baseline predialysis systolic blood pressure were more likely to be female, never have smoked, have a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease and higher serum albumin levels. Mean (SD) for monthly average of pre-systolic blood pressure, pre-diastolic blood pressure, pre dialysis pulse pressure and intradialytic changes in systolic blood pressure were 141 (21), 73 (12), 68 (15) and -10 (24) mm Hg, respectively. Mean (SD) MMSE was 26.7 (2.8) and mean (SD) NAART was 102.3 (12.2). Twenty two percent of patients met criteria for depression using the CESD (Table 3).
Table 2.
Characteristics of participants by quartiles of pre-systolic blood pressure
Total N = 314 | Pre SBP, Q1 N = 77 | Pre SBP, Q2 N = 80 | Pre SBP, Q3 N = 80 | Pre SBP, Q4 N = 77 | Trend P-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 63 ± 16 | 65 ± 14 | 64 ± 18 | 61 ± 17 | 63 ± 16 | 0.42 | |
Female (%) | 47 | 39 | 43 | 44 | 61 | 0.01 | |
African American (%) | 22 | 17 | 26 | 20 | 26 | 0.33 | |
Education (%) | <12th grade | 10 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 0.51 |
High school graduate | 55 | 47 | 60 | 59 | 53 | ||
2+ Years college | 35 | 40 | 30 | 33 | 39 | ||
Medical History (%) | Stroke | 18 | 14 | 25 | 9 | 23 | 0.60 |
PVD | 24 | 30 | 23 | 24 | 18 | 0.12 | |
CAD | 37 | 47 | 38 | 33 | 31 | 0.04 | |
Hypertension | 89 | 81 | 90 | 91 | 95 | 0.01 | |
Diabetes | 48 | 43 | 53 | 44 | 52 | 0.48 | |
Heart Failure | 36 | 43 | 34 | 29 | 39 | 0.49 | |
Primary cause of ESRD (%) | Diabetes | 36 | 33 | 40 | 32 | 41 | 0.18 |
Glomerulonephritis | 19 | 26 | 16 | 24 | 9 | ||
Hypertension | 20 | 14 | 21 | 14 | 29 | ||
Other | 17 | 16 | 17 | 22 | 13 | ||
Unknown | 8 | 11 | 5 | 9 | 8 | ||
Smoking History (%) | Never | 38 | 32 | 29 | 44 | 48 | 0.05 |
Past | 53 | 59 | 59 | 47 | 45 | ||
Current | 9 | 8 | 12 | 9 | 7 | ||
Monthly Pre Systolic BP (mm Hg) | 141 ± 21 | 115 ± 10 | 135 ± 4 | 148 ± 4 | 168 ± 12 | <0.01 | |
Monthly Diastolic BP (mm Hg) | 73 ± 12 | 62 ± 9 | 70 ± 8 | 76 ± 9 | 84 ± 11 | <0.01 | |
Monthly Pulse Pressure (mm Hg) | 68 ± 15 | 53 ± 9 | 64 ± 8 | 72 ± 10 | 84 ± 11 | <0.01 | |
Intradialytic Blood Pressure (mm Hg) | −10 ± 24 | −3 ± 19 | −7 ± 20 | −12 ± 23 | −18 ± 29 | <0.01 | |
Intradialytic Weight Gain (kg) | 2.6 ± 1.1 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 2.6 ± 1.1 | 2.4 ± 1.1 | 0.03 | |
Body Mass Index (kg/m2) | 28 ± 7 | 28 ± 6 | 29 ± 7 | 28 ± 7 | 29 ± 8 | 0.51 | |
Hematocrit (%) | 36 ± 4 | 35 ± 4 | 36 ± 4 | 35 ± 4 | 36 ± 3 | 0.65 | |
Serum Albumin (g/dL) | 3.8 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.4 | 3.8 ± 0.3 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | 3.9 ± 0.4 | <0.01 | |
Phosphate (mg/dL) | 5.5 ± 1.5 | 5.5 ± 1.5 | 5.5 ± 1.8 | 5.5 ± 1.4 | 5.4 ± 1.4 | 0.57 | |
Dialysis Vintage (months) | 14 (7–35) | 18 (7–40) | 13 (5–33) | 15 (8–34) | 15 (7–27) | 0.61 | |
Parathyroid Hormone (pg/ml) | 228 (145–396) | 216 (148–403) | 239 (146–427) | 220 (121–336) | 249 (163–388) | 0.86 | |
spKt/V | 1.51 ± 0.24 | 1.52 ± 0.26 | 1.49 ± 0.23 | 1.52 ± 0.25 | 1.53 ± 0.22 | 0.68 |
Continuous data shown are mean ± standard deviation except dialysis vintage and parathyroid hormone which are median (interquartile range); categorical data are presented as percentage. P-values for education primary cause of ESRD and smoking are from Chi-square test. P-values for dialysis vintage and PTH are from Kruskal-Wallis test. Conversion factors for units: albumin in g/dL to g/L, multiply by 10; phosphate in mg/dL to mmol/L, multiply by 0.3229.
*Abbreviations: PVD, peripheral vascular disease; CAD, coronary artery disease; ESRD, End-Stage Renal Disease; SBP, systolic blood pressure
Table 3.
Cognitive function in hemodialysis patients
Test | Test Description | N | Mean ± SD |
---|---|---|---|
MMSE | Screen | 314 | 26.7 ± 2.8 |
NAARTVIQ | Intelligence | 311 | 102.3 ± 12.2 |
Delay Recall | Primarily Cortical (Memory) | 309 | 4.4 ± 2.7 |
Immediate Recall | Primarily Cortical (Learning) | 312 | 23.8 ± 7.2 |
Recognition | Primarily Cortical (Recognition) | 310 | 20.7 ± 3.0 |
Block Design | Primarily Subcortical (executive functioning and processing speed) | 307 | 26.1 ± 10.6 |
Digit Symbol | 282 | 40.1 ± 17.0 | |
Trails A | 293 | 61.3 ± 39.6 | |
Trails B | 289 | 136.9 (64.7) 20.8% non completers | |
CESD | Depression | 311 | 10.6 (8.1) |
Test results are mean ±standard deviation. Raw scores represent number correct, except for Trails A and B, which are reported in seconds required to complete the task. For Trails B 21% were unable to complete the testing within 300 seconds. MMSE=mini mental state exam. NAARTVIQ= North American Adult Reading Test Verbal IQ. CESD=Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression
We noted no significant relationship in univariate or multivariable analysis between systolic blood pressure or intradialytic changes in systolic blood pressure with cognitive function using either continuous or quartile analyses (Tables 3 and 4). However, there were significant univariate associations between both lower diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure with worse performance on tasks assessing executive function, including block design, digit-symbol coding, Trails A and Trails B (Table 3). These relationships did not however persist after multivariable adjustment (Tables 3 and 4).
Table 4.
Relationship between blood pressure measures and cognitive function
Unadjusted | Adjusted* | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive Test | β (95% CI) | p-value | β (95% CI) | p-value |
Systolic Blood Pressure | ||||
MMSE | −0.21 (−0.52, 0.11) | 0.19 | −0.22 (−0.52, 0.09) | 0.16 |
NAART | −0.84 (−2.20, 0.52) | 0.23 | −0.24 (−1.47, 0.99) | 0.70 |
Percent Retention | −0.39 (−3.52, 2.74) | 0.81 | −0.61 (−3.78, 2.57) | 0.71 |
Recognition | −0.16 (-−.49, 0.17) | 0.35 | −0.21 (−0.53, 0.11) | 0.19 |
Block Design | 0.16 (−1.03, 1.36) | 0.79 | 0.20 (−0.87, 1.28) | 0.71 |
Digit-Symbol Coding | 0.48 (−1.52, 2.49) | 0.64 | 0.07 (−1.56, 1.70) | 0.93 |
Trails A | −1.64 (−6.25, 2.97) | 0.49 | −0.30 (−4.72, 4.12) | 0.89 |
Trails B | −4.81 (−17.67, 8.05) | 0.46 | −4.29 (−15.46, 6.89) | 0.45 |
Diastolic Blood Pressure | ||||
MMSE | 0.03 (−0.35, 0.28) | 0.84 | -−.23 (−0.57, 0.11) | 0.19 |
NAART | -−.80 (−3.15, −0.46) | 0.01 | −0.48 (−1.86, 0.90) | 0.49 |
Percent Retention | 1.71 (−1.42, 4.84) | 0.28 | −0.60 (−4.16, 2.96) | 0.74 |
Recognition | 0.20 (−0.13, 0.54) | 0.23 | −0.23 (−0.58, 0.13) | 0.22 |
Block Design | 1.44 (0.26, 2.62) | 0.02 | 0.15 (−1.05, 1.35) | 0.80 |
Digit-Symbol Coding | 3.86 (1.90, 5.81) | <0.001 | −0.30 (−2.12, 1.52) | 0.75 |
Trails A | −5.16 (−9.73, -0.58) | 0.03 | 1.88 (−3.05, 6.82) | 0.45 |
Trails B | −18.88 (−31.38, -6.35) | <0.001 | −0.95 (−13.38, 11.47) | 0.88 |
Pulse Pressure | ||||
MMSE | −0.27 (−0.58, 0.04) | 0.09 | −0.19 (−0.52, 0.14) | 0.27 |
NAART | 0.31 (−1.05, 1.67) | 0.66 | −0.03 (−1.35, 1.30) | 0.97 |
Percent Retention | −1.97 (−5.10, 1.15) | 0.21 | −0.55 (−3.99, 2.89) | 0.75 |
Recognition | −0.39 (−0.72, −0.06) | 0.02 | −0.18 (−0.53, 0.17) | 0.30 |
Block Design | −0.99 (−2.18, 0.21) | 0.11 | 0.22 (−0.94, 1.37) | 0.71 |
Digit-Symbol Coding | −2.50 (−4.48, −0.53) | 0.01 | 0.35 (−1.42, 2.13) | 0.69 |
Trails A | 1.95 (−2.63, 6.54) | 0.40 | −1.97 (−6.74, 2.80) | 0.42 |
Trails B | 9.22 (−3.59, 22.03) | 0.16 | −6.50 (−18.67, 5.67) | 0.30 |
Intradialytic Blood Pressure | ||||
MMSE | −0.20 (−0.51, 0.12) | 0.23 | −0.16 (−0.46, 0.14) | 0.28 |
NAART | 0.46 (−0.92, 1.84) | 0.51 | −0.14 (−1.36, 1.08) | 0.82 |
Percent Retention | −0.76 (−3.94, 2.41) | 0.64 | 0.16 (−2.98, 3.31) | 0.92 |
Recognition | 0.14 (−0.20, 0.48) | 0.42 | 0.31 (−0.01, 0.62) | 0.06 |
Discussion
In this study, we found in univariate analysis that maintenance hemodialysis patients with lower pre-dialysis diastolic blood pressure and higher pulse pressure perform worse on tasks assessing executive function. However, this finding was no longer significant after multivariable adjustment. We found no significant association between systolic blood pressure or intradialytic changes in systolic blood pressure change with any measure of cognitive function in univariate or multivariable analyses.
There are very few studies that have evaluated whether blood pressure is a risk factor for cognitive impairment in dialysis patients. Murray et al. noted a high prevalence of cognitive impairment in 374 hemodialysis patients aged 55 years and older in comparison with an age-matched control group. In that study, a history of stroke, higher Kt/V and lower education level, but not high blood pressure, was independently associated with worse cognitive function.2 Kurella Tamura et al. evaluated the association of traditional cardiovascular risk factors with cognitive function using the Modified Mini-Mental State Exam (3MS)26 and the Trail Making Test B in the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trial and found no significant relationship between either systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure with cognitive function.1 Finally, Seghal et al. evaluated the prevalence and risk factors for cognitive impairment, assessed using the MMSE, in 336 hemodialysis and reported results that were consistent with our data. Specifically, lower diastolic blood pressure values were associated with lower MMSE in univariate analysis, but not in multivariable analysis.3 Our study adds to these studies by focusing on different forms of blood pressure as the exposure variable of interest, employing a more comprehensive set of cognitive tests, as well as considering nonlinear relationships.
There are several potential explanations for the lack of an independent association between measures of blood pressure and cognitive function. First, although high blood pressure may cause cerebrovascular disease and thereby cognitive impairment in the earlier stages of kidney disease, these relationships may not be discernable in dialysis patients, given, multiple causes of both blood pressure variability and cognitive impairment in this patient population.27 Second, it is possible that we are limited by the cross sectional nature of the study, which may introduce survivor bias whereby those with either low or high blood pressure may have died. Third, because both low and high blood pressure may be risk factors for cognitive impairment our results may have been null due to these opposite effects. We believe the latter is unlikely, as we evaluated the relationship in both quartiles and continuous quadratic forms, and did not uncover any nonlinear relationships. Finally, it is possible that different mechanisms and treatment of hypertension may play a role in cognitive impairment and these were not distinguished in the current study. In fact, a recent uncontrolled study in dialysis patients suggested that volume control of hypertension may be more important in preserving cognitive function than treatment of hypertension with medications.28
The study has several strengths and limitations. Strengths include a moderately large number of participants with detailed measures of cognitive function, incorporation of various forms of blood pressure, and a dialysis population that is fairly generalizable to the US dialysis population.29 Limitations include the cross sectional nature of the study and the fact that the cognitive testing was completed during the hemodialysis treatment. Although testing during dialysis may potentially lead to worse performance on a particular cognitive test this would not be expected to affect the relationship between blood pressure and cognitive function.
In summary, we found no evidence of an association between any measure of blood pressure and performance on cognitive testing in multivariable analyses. Future studies should incorporate longitudinal analyses to confirm these findings.
Table 5.
Multivariable relationship between quartiles of blood pressure measures and cognitive function*
Cognitive Tests | Trend p-value | Q1 vs. Q4 | Q2 vs. Q4 | Q3 vs. Q4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β (95% CI) | p-value | β (95% CI) | p-value | β (95% CI) | p-value | ||
Systolic Blood Pressure Quartiles | |||||||
MMSE | 0.07 | 0.68 (−0.19, 1.56) | 0.12 | 0.80 (−0.04, 1.65) | 0.06 | −0.11 (−0.95, 0.74) | 0.80 |
NAART | 0.10 | −1.13 (−4.67, 2.41) | 0.53 | 2.65 (−0.77, 6.07) | 0.13 | −1.13 (−4.55, 2.28) | 0.51 |
Percent Retention | 0.46 | 0.84 (−8.36, 10.05) | 0.86 | 5.97 (−2.93, 14.87) | 0.19 | 4.92 (−3.97, 13.80) | 0.28 |
Recognition | 0.04 | 0.48 (−0.43, 1.40) | 0.30 | 0.90 (0.01, 1.79) | 0.05 | −0.28 (−1.16, 0.61) | 0.54 |
Block Design | 0.94 | −0.53 (−3.66, 2.61) | 0.74 | 0.43 (−2.59, 3.45) | 0.78 | 0.19 (−2.83, 3.21) | 0.90 |
Digit-Symbol Coding | 0.31 | 0.75 (−4.02, 5.51) | 0.76 | 1.96 (−2.55, 6.47) | 0.39 | 4.02 (−0.49, 8.53) | 0.08 |
Trails A | 0.35 | −1.74 (−14.60, 11.13) | 0.79 | −9.75 (−21.98, 2.48) | 0.12 | −7.58 (−19.72, 4.57) | 0.22 |
Trails B | 0.71 | 8.26 (−24.24, 40.75) | 0.62 | −7.32 (−38.28, 23.65) | 0.64 | 8.29 (−22.33, 38.91) | 0.60 |
Diastolic Blood Pressure Quartiles | |||||||
MMSE | 0.20 | 1.01 (0.06, 1.95) | 0.04 | 0.73 (−0.24, 1.69) | 0.14 | 0.42 (−0.43, 1.27) | 0.33 |
NAART | 0.18 | 2.53 (−1.29, 6.36) | 0.19 | 2.66 (−1.24, 6.56) | 0.18 | 3.82 (0.40, 7.25) | 0.03 |
Percent Retention | 0.90 | 2.79 (−7.11, 12.69) | 0.58 | 0.62 (−9.50, 10.74) | 0.90 | 2.76 (−6.08, 11.59) | 0.54 |
Recognition | 0.31 | 0.74 (−0.26, 1.73) | 0.15 | 0.13 (−0.89, 1.15) | 0.80 | −0.06 (−0.95, 0.82) | 0.89 |
Block Design | 0.17 | −0.04 (−3.34, 3.26) | 0.98 | −2.31 (−5.67, 1.06) | 0.18 | 1.21 (−1.76, 4.19) | 0.42 |
Digit-Symbol Coding | 0.40 | 2.04 (−2.99, 7.08) | 0.42 | −0.91 (−6.00, 4.18) | 0.73 | 2.52 (−1.95, 7.00) | 0.27 |
Trails A | 0.56 | −8.47 (−22.11, 5.17) | 0.22 | −0.91 (−14.66, 12.83) | 0.90 | −4.39 (−16.59, 7.81) | 0.48 |
Trails B | 0.88 | −5.47 (−39.80, 28.86) | 0.76 | −5.00 (−39.77, 29.77) | 0.78 | −12.29 (−42.91, 18.32) | 0.43 |
Pulse Pressure Quartiles | |||||||
MMSE | 0.38 | 0.56 (−0.34, 1.46) | 0.22 | 0.75 (−0.11, 1.62) | 0.09 | 0.37 (−0.48, 1.21) | 0.39 |
NAART | 0.75 | 0.40 (−3.23, 4.02) | 0.83 | 1.71 (−1.80, 5.21) | 0.34 | 0.04 (−3.39, 3.46) | 0.98 |
Percent Retention | 0.66 | 2.92 (−6.48, 12.32) | 0.54 | 1.20 (−7.94, 10.33) | 0.80 | 5.26 (−3.53, 14.06) | 0.24 |
Recognition | 0.47 | 0.54 (−0.41, 1.48) | 0.27 | 0.52 (−0.40, 1.44) | 0.27 | 0.69 (−0.20, 1.57) | 0.13 |
Block Design | 0.96 | 0.84 (−2.33, 4.00) | 0.60 | 0.60 (−2.46, 3.66) | 0.70 | 0.58 (−2.41, 3.56) | 0.70 |
Digit-Symbol Coding | 0.49 | 0.78 (−4.03, 5.60) | 0.75 | 3.16 (−1.62, 7.94) | 0.19 | −0.03 (−4.58, 4.52) | 0.99 |
Acknowledgements
The study was funded through grants R21 DK068310 (MJS), K23 DK071636 (DW), K24 DK078204 (MJS), R01 DK078204 (MJS) and a Carl W. Gottschalk Research Scholar Grant to DEW.
References
- 1.Kurella Tamura M, Larive B, Unruh ML, et al. Prevalence and correlates of cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network trials. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;5:1429–1438. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01090210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Murray AM, Tupper DE, Knopman DS, et al. Cognitive impairment in hemodialysis patients is common. Neurology. 2006;67:216–223. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000225182.15532.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sehgal AR, Grey SF, DeOreo PB, et al. Prevalence, recognition, and implications of mental impairment among hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 1997;30:41–49. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(97)90563-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Griva K, Stygall J, Hankins M, et al. Cognitive impairment and 7-year mortality in dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56:693–703. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mehrabian S, Duron E, Labouree F, et al. Relationship between orthostatic hypotension and cognitive impairment in the elderly. J Neurol Sci. 2010;299:45–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Novak V, Hajjar I. The relationship between blood pressure and cognitive function. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:686–698. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2010.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rose KM, Couper D, Eigenbrodt ML, et al. Orthostatic hypotension and cognitive function: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34:1–7. doi: 10.1159/000255459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Swan GE, DeCarli C, Miller BL, et al. Association of midlife blood pressure to late-life cognitive decline and brain morphology. Neurology. 1998;51:986–993. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.4.986. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Waldstein SR, Brown JR, Maier KJ, et al. Diagnosis of hypertension and high blood pressure levels negatively affect cognitive function in older adults. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29:174–180. doi: 10.1207/s15324796abm2903_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Waldstein SR, Giggey PP, Thayer JF, et al. Nonlinear relations of blood pressure to cognitive function: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Hypertension. 2005;45:374–379. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000156744.44218.74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Foley RN, Herzog CA, Collins AJ. Blood pressure and long-term mortality in United States hemodialysis patients: USRDS Waves 3 and 4 Study. Kidney Int. 2002;62:1784–1790. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00636.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, et al. Impact of hypertension on cardiomyopathy, morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 1996;49:1379–1385. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Iseki K, Fukiyama K. Predictors of stroke in patients receiving chronic hemodialysis. Kidney Int. 1996;50:1672–1675. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zager PG, Nikolic J, Brown RH, et al. “U” curve association of blood pressure and mortality in hemodialysis patients. Medical Directors of Dialysis Clinic, Inc. Kidney Int. 1998;54:561–569. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00005.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shoji T, Tsubakihara Y, Fujii M, et al. Hemodialysis-associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1212–1220. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00812.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Levey AS, et al. Lowest systolic blood pressure is associated with stroke in stages 3 to 4 chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18:960–966. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2006080858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Inrig JK, Oddone EZ, Hasselblad V, et al. Association of intradialytic blood pressure changes with hospitalization and mortality rates in prevalent ESRD patients. Kidney Int. 2007;71:454–461. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Inrig JK, Patel UD, Toto RD, et al. Association of blood pressure increases during hemodialysis with 2-year mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: a secondary analysis of the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave 2 Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009;54:881–890. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Klassen PS, Lowrie EG, Reddan DN, et al. Association between pulse pressure and mortality in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. JAMA. 2002;287:1548–1555. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.12.1548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Uttl B. North American Adult Reading Test: age norms, reliability, and validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2002;24:1123–1137. doi: 10.1076/jcen.24.8.1123.8375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tulsky D ZJ, Lebetter M. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition (WAIS-III), Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Scale (WMS-III): Technical Manual. Harcourt Brace & Company; San Antonio, TX: 1997. San Antonio, TX. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Heaton R GI, Mathews C. Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery. Psychological Assessment Resources Inc; Odessa, FL: Odessa, FL.: 1991. 1991. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Radloff L. The CESD scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. J Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tobin J. Estimation for relationships with limited dependent variables. Econometrica. 1958;26:24–36. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Teng EL, Chui HC. The Modified Mini-Mental State (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry. 1987;48:314–318. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Agarwal R. Blood pressure and mortality among hemodialysis patients. Hypertension. 2010;55:762–768. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.144899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Dogukan A, Guler M, Yavuzkir MF, et al. The effect of strict volume control on cognitive functions in chronic hemodialysis patients. Renal Fail. 2009;31(8):641–6. doi: 10.3109/08860220903134548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Collins AJ, Foley RN, Herzog C, et al. Excerpts from the US Renal Data System 2009 Annual Data Report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;55:S1–420. A426–427. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.10.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]