Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Immunol. 2010 Apr 15;184(8):4062–4068. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903002

Metabolic Shifts in Immunity and Inflammation

Douglas J Kominsky 1,3, Eric L Campbell 2,3, Sean P Colgan 2,3
PMCID: PMC4077461  NIHMSID: NIHMS592422  PMID: 20368286

Abstract

Sites of ongoing inflammation and triggered immune responses are characterized by significant changes in metabolic activity. Recent studies have indicated that such shifts in tissue metabolism result from a combination of profound recruitment of inflammatory cells (neutrophils and monocytes) and high proliferation rates among lymphocyte populations. The resultant shifts in energy supply and demand can result in metabolic acidosis and diminished delivery and/or availability of oxygen, leading to hypoxia extensive enough to trigger transcriptional and translation changes in tissue phenotype. Such phenotypic shifts can imprint fundamental changes to tissue metabolism. Here, we review recent work addressing metabolic changes and metabolic control of inflammation and immunity.

Introduction

Ongoing inflammatory and immune responses are associated with dramatic shifts in tissue metabolism. These changes include local depletion of nutrients, increased oxygen consumption and the generation of large quantities of reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates (1). Such shifts in tissue metabolism result, at least in part, from profound recruitment of inflammatory cell types, particularly myeloid cells such as neutrophils (PMN) and monocytes. The vast majority of inflammatory cells are recruited to, as opposed resident at, inflammatory lesions (2). By stark contrast, adaptive immune responses are characterized by high rates of local T and B cell proliferation and have significantly different metabolic demands (3, 4). Herein, it is important to understand the interactions between microenvironmental metabolic changes (e.g. glucose, oxygen, ATP) as they relate to metabolic triggers and molecular mechanisms immune cell recruitment / activation into these areas (summarized in Table 1). Importantly, it is imperative to define whether mechanisms initiated by such metabolic shifts might serve as important therapeutic targets.

Table 1.

Metabolic Comparisons between Innate and Adaptive Immunity

Type of Immunity
Innate
Adaptive
Cells Involved PMN, eosinophil
Macrophage
Dendritic Cell
T cell, B cell, NK cell
Metabolic Trigger(s) Recruitment Differentiation Local Proliferation
Recruitment
Activation Stressor(s) Migration
Phagocytosis
Respiratory Burst
Ag-induced Differentiation
Metabolic Adaptor (s) HIF, mTOR, Akt HIF, mTOR, Akt
Mitochondria Few Many
Primary Energy Source Glycolysis Respiration
Methylation Dependence Unknown Proliferation
Ag-induced Differentiation

Energy Metabolism in Inflammation and Immune Responses

One of the fundamental differences between the inflammatory response and the immune response is the means by which leukocytes obtain energy. Cells of myeloid lineages derive their energy almost exclusively from glycolysis while lymphocytes utilize predominantly oxidative phosphorylation (3, 5). In part, these differences shape the appropriateness of the immune response. For example, evidence in recent years indicates that the abilities of lymphocytes to proliferate and quiesce are strictly controlled by essential metabolites that support anabolic growth (3).

As opposed to lymphocytes which proliferate within tissues, myeloid cells such as polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN, neutrophils), macrophages and dendritic cells are recruited to sites of inflammation during immune responses. In transit, these cells expend tremendous amounts of energy. Cell migration, for example, requires large amounts of actin turnover, and by its nature, is particularly ATP demanding (6). Once at sites of inflammation, nutrient, energy and oxygen demands increase to accomplish processes of phagocytosis and microbial killing. It has long been known that PMN are primarily glycolytic cells, have few mitochondria and produce little energy from respiration (7). It is thought predominantly glycolytic metabolism ensures that PMN can function at low oxygen concentrations (even anoxia) associated with deep inflammatory lesions. In this regard, recent studies have revealed that PMN have unique mitochondrial properties, namely that the mitochondria maintain a transmembrane potential via the glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle which functions to regulate aerobic glycolysis as opposed to producing energy (5). This unique mitochondrial phenotype appears to develop along the differentiation pathway from myeloid precursor cells.

T and B cells, by contrast, utilize amino acids, glucose and lipids as energy sources during oxidative phosphorylation. As one might imagine, mitogenic stimulation of thymocytes or naïve T cells is a highly energy demanding process. As lymphocytes proliferate, they become more and more dependent on glucose uptake. Stimulated proliferation of thymocytes can result in nearly twenty-fold increases in glucose uptake, which is accomplished by plasma membrane high expression of glucose transporter-1 (8), which is tightly controlled by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF, see later). Nutrient uptake in naïve T cells is strictly instructed through IL-7 and IL-4-dependent pathways (9). During periods of high proliferation, even in the presence of adequate oxygen concentration, lymphocytes become progressively more dependent on aerobic glycolysis for ATP synthesis. Lactate production from glycolysis can increase by as much as 40-fold in mitogen-stimulated T cells. When glucose becomes limiting, as it often does at sites of high immune activity, T cells can utilize alternative energy sources, such as glutamine, within the TCA cycle (3).

Transcriptional Control of Immune Metabolism by HIF

Sites of ongoing inflammation and high immune activity can become rapidly depleted of both nutrients and oxygen. Activated PMN, for example, can increase their oxygen demand by as 50-fold in the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates (the so called respiratory burst mediated by NADPH oxidase) necessary to kill bacteria following phagocytosis (10). Somewhat surprisingly, proliferating T cells only moderately increase oxygen consumption (3). As a global regulator of oxygen homeostasis, the αβ-heterodimeric transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is a central part of all cellular metabolism (11, 12). HIF-1 and HIF-2 (also called EPAS) are members of the Per-ARNT-Sim (PAS) family of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors. HIF activation is dependent upon stabilization of an O2-dependent degradation domain of the α-subunit and subsequent nuclear translocation to form a functional complex with HIF-1β and cofactors such as CBP and its ortholog p300 (13). Under conditions of adequate oxygen supply, iron and oxygen dependent hydoxylation of two prolines (Pro564 and Pro 402) within the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD) of HIF-1α or HIF-2α initiates the association with the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein (pVHL) and rapid degradation via ubiquitin-E3 ligase proteasomal targeting (14, 15). A second hypoxic switch operates in the carboxy terminal transactivation domain of HIF-1 or HIF-2α. Here, hypoxia blocks the hydroxylation of asparagine-803 consequently facilitating the recruitment of CBP/p300 (16).

HIF-1α was the original isoform purified by oligonucleotide binding to the 3′ region of the EPO gene (17). HIF-2α was subsequently identified by homology searches and as a binding partner for the heterodimeric partner HIF-1β (18). It was originally thought that the HIF-2α isoform was expressed only in endothelial cells (hence the name endothelial PAS protein or EPAS) (19). HIF-3α is a more distantly related isoform and when spliced appropriately, can encode a protein that antagonizes HRE-dependent gene induction (20). For a number of years, it remained poorly understood how hypoxia might stabilize the expression of HIF. In the past several years, the molecular mechanisms of HIF activation have become clarified. These studies have defined two HIF selective iron and oxygen dependent hydroxylation enzymes (on HIF prolines 564 and 402) within the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD) of the HIF-α subunit (2124). Since other mammalian prolyl-hydroxylases (e.g. pro-collagen PHD’s) were 2-oxoglutarate-dependent (2-OG) (25), it was predicted that the HIF prolyl hydroxylases would also belong to this family of enzymes. Based on conserved structural features (25), a candidate molecular approach was used to define HIF-modifying enzymes. This approach identified the HIF prolyl hydroxylases as the products of genes related to C.elegans egl-9, a gene that was first described in the context of an egg-laying abnormal (EGL) phenotype (21). In mammalian cells, three PHD isoforms were identified (PHD 1–3), and shown to hydroxylate HIF-α in vitro (22, 24).

The discovery of HIF-selective PHD’s as central regulators of HIF expression has now provided the basis for potential development of PHD-based molecular tools and therapies (26, 27). Pharmacological inactivation of the PHDs by 2-OG analogues is sufficient to stabilize HIF-α (26), but this action is nonspecific with respect to individual PHD isoforms. In vitro studies do suggest significant differences in substrate specificity. For example, PHD3 does not hydroxylate proline 564 on HIF-α, and comparison of enzyme activity in vitro showed that the ODD sequence is hydroxylated most efficiently by PHD2 (25, 28). These observations have generated an interest in identifying enzyme-modifying therapeutics. Indeed, a number of PHD inhibitors have been described, including direct inhibitors of the prolyl-hydroxylase (29), analogs of naturally occurring cyclic hydroxymates (30), as well as antagonists of alpha-keto-glutarate (26).

Activated T cells show increased expression of HIF-1α. In particular, HIF-1α has been shown to provide an important survival signal for T cells, preventing them from undergoing activation-induced cell death in hypoxic settings. T cell survival in hypoxia is, at least in part, mediated by the vasoactive peptide adrenomedullin (31). Other studies using chimeric mice bearing HIF-1α-deficient T and B cells have revealed lineage-specific defects that result in increased autoimmunity, including autoantibodies, increased rheumatoid factor and kidney damage (4).

HIF function has been studied in some detail in myeloid cells. Cre-LoxP-based elimination of HIF-1α in cells of the myeloid lineage (lysozyme M promoter) have revealed multiple features which importantly implicate metabolic control of myeloid function (32). In particular, these studies have shown that PMN and macrophage bacterial killing capacities are severely limited in the absence of HIF-1α, as HIF-1α is central to production of antimicrobial peptides and granule proteases. These findings are explained, at least in part, by the inability of myeloid cells to mount appropriate metabolic responses to diminished O2 characteristic of infectious sites (32). Finally, compelling evidence have revealed that HIF-1α transcriptionally controls the critical integrin important in all myeloid cell adhesion and transmigration, namely the β2 integrin (CD18) (33, 34).

A growing body of evidence indicates that HIF-mediated signaling pathways in parenchymal cells (e.g. epithelial cells) coordinate inflammatory responses. For instance, intestinal epithelial cells form a critical barrier to the flux of antigenic material across the gut. During episodes of inflammation, barrier function is compromised and can lead to accelerated inflammatory responses. In response to multiple metabolic insults initiated within inflammatory lesions (e.g. decreased O2 supply, increased glucose demand, decreased ATP generation, vasculitis), intestinal epithelial HIF-1α is activated (Figure 1). Studies in mice lacking intestinal epithelial HIF-1α have revealed that HIF-based signaling is central to the protection of barrier function through the induction of multiple genes are important in the restitution of barrier function following injury (35). These findings may be somewhat model-dependent, where epithelial HIF-based signaling has also been shown to promote inflammation in some models (36). Nonetheless, ongoing studies targeting the induction of HIF (through inhibition of PHD’s) are promising in animal models of intestinal inflammation (37, 38).

Figure 1. Metabolic stress points in inflammation and immunity.

Figure 1

Migration of inflammatory cells to sites of infection changes local tissue metabolism in fundamental ways. A number of metabolic limitations contribute to substantial a shift in tissue metabolism (A). In vivo evidence for inflammation-associated hypoxia (so called “inflammatory hypoxia”) using nitroimidazole-based dye retention in vehicle treated mouse colon revealing a degree of “physiological hypoxia” (B) compared to TNBS-induced colitis resulting in intense and deep tissue hypoxia (C). (Adapted from reference 35, DC=dendritic cell; T=T-cell; PMN=neutrophil).

mTOR and Innate Immunity

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionary conserved serine-threonine kinase that is central to cellular sensing of environmental stress (39). As a integral part of overall metabolism, mTOR monitors cellular ATP:AMP ratios, insulin and amino acid levels (39). mTOR functions as part of two major protein complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2) that coordinate signaling for anabolic and catabolic metabolism. An important function of the mTORC1 complex is integration of phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)- and Akt-mediated signaling and in complex and is sensitive to rapamycin inhibition (when complexed to FK506-binding protein 12). mTORC2 on the other hand, phosphorylates Akt Ser 473 but is insensitive to rapamycin inhibition.

In lymphocytes, mTOR controls cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase and can therefore control proliferative responses. It is through these mechanisms that inhibitors of rapamycin (sirolimus) has been used as a potent immunosuppressive agent (40). mTOR is activated by growth factor, extracellular signaling molecules (e.g. Toll-like receptor ligands) and through antigen-induced T cell-receptor signaling. Activation of mTOR through these various stimuli provides increased capacity for aerobic glycolysis and ATP generation during episodes of high T cell proliferation (3). As such, rapamycin has been shown to enrich CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Treg) and recent studies have indicated that mTOR intrinsically regulates T cell memory function (41).

In myeloid cells such as macrophages and DC, mTOR1-based metabolism is particularly important in the integration of PI3K and Akt signaling. This nexus between mTOR and Akt forms a critical linkage to multiple cytokine signaling cascades (39). Emerging evidence suggests that this may be one of the most important regulatory pathways for integrating multiple TLR signaling pathways, and include the production of type I IFN, IL-10, and IL-12/23 (39, 40).

Nucleotide Metabolism in Inflammation and Immunity

In addition to its role in intracellular energy transfer, the nucleotide ATP plays a critical role in extracellular signaling reactions in inflammation and immune responses. Extracellular ATP (or ADP) can directly bind to cell surface purinergic receptors (termed P2-type) or can be metabolized to adenosine at the cell surface, where it is made available to bind and activate adenosine receptor(s) (P1-type). Extracellular nucleotides are metabolized primary by cell-surface enzymes called ectonucleotidases, whose enzymatic activity is to hydrolyze phosphate groups from circulating nucleotides with varying degrees of specificity for their substrates.

CD39 is one such ectonucleotidase initially observed as an activation marker in paracortical lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells resident within lymphoid tissue (42). Cloning of CD39 revealed the presence of apyrase conserved regions (ACR) and striking sequence homology with yeast guanosine diphosphatase, an enzyme involved in catalyzing the removal of a phosphate from GDP after sugar transfer within the Golgi apparatus (42). Further identification of a number of CD39-like nucleoside triphosphate diphosphohydrolases (NTPDases) have since revealed a family of 8 related proteins, denoted NTPdase1-8 (NTPDase1 representing CD39 under this nomenclature). NTPDase1,2,3 and 8 are transmembrane proteins with 5 ACRs situated on the extracellular region, conferring nucleotidase activity to the enzyme and allowing for hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides (43). Together, these NTPDases act in a concerted manner to regulate the production of extracellular adenosine monophosphate (AMP).

The second step in metabolism of extracellular adenosine is conferred by the glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored membrane protein, ecto-5′nucleotidase (CD73). CD73 is the predominant source for accumulation of extracellular adenosine from released adenine nucleotides (44). CD73 metabolizes AMP to adenosine, which is then either free to act on adenosine receptors or is transported into the cell by dipyridamole-sensetive channels and degraded by the purine salvage pathway.

Extracellular adenosine binds to one (or more) of four adenosine receptors (AR; A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR) (45). A number of studies have addressed the contribution of individual ARs in murine mucosal inflammation. While less is known about the role of the A1 or A3AR, both A2A and A2BAR have been shown to attenuate mucosal inflammation and to provide tissue protection (46). From this perspective, A2AAR and A2BAR agonists represent a potential group of therapeutics for the treatment of mucosal inflammation. One study found a critical role for the A2AAR signaling in T cell-mediated regulation of colitis and treatment with a specific A2AAR agonist attenuated the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and attenuation of colitis (47). Activation of adenosine A2AAR seems to limit reperfusion injury by inhibiting inflammatory processes in neutrophils, platelets, macrophages and T cells (47). The contribution of A2BAR to mucosal inflammation has been somewhat discrepant, where in two separate studies, mice lacking A2BAR have shown either increased and decreased susceptibility to DSS-induced intestinal inflammation (48, 49). Additional studies will be necessary to rectify these differences.

Methylation-dependent Control of Metabolism

Immune responses and cellular differentiation are tightly mediated by epigenetic modifications, which constitute another level of control of gene expression. Regulation of gene expression works primarily through modification of chromatin structure, allowing regions of DNA to be more or less accessible to transcription. Epigenetic modifications include ubiquitylation, acetylation, and methylation of histones, proteins that interact with DNA to form the secondary and tertiary structures of chromatin, and DNA methylation of cytosine residues at CpG dinucleotides. All cell types possess a unique epigenetic profile determined early in differentiation and carried through to fully differentiated cells and tissue (50). It is becoming increasingly appreciated, however, that this epigenetic profile can be perturbed by environmental stress (51). It has been know for many years that changes in epigenetic modifications contribute to a number of cancer types (52) and is now becoming clear that these changes play roles in other disease states as well.

Epigenetic modifications are a crucial part of normal immune system function. The differentiation of T cells from progenitor to the Th1 or Th2 lineage requires silencing of the genes associated with other lineages, which is accomplished via epigenetic mechanisms (53, 54). Similarly, development of two other important T cells lineages, Th17 and regulatory T cells (T regs) is controlled through epigenetic modifications (55, 56). Recent studies also suggest that epigenetic changes are important for cells of the innate immune system such as macrophages (57). Several lines of evidence suggest that aberrant epigenetic regulation plays a role in chronic inflammation. While no DNA demethylase has been identified, there are types of modifications that occur during chronic inflammation that influence DNA methylation states and render genes more or less accessible to transcription (58). Additionally, methotrexate (MTX), a drug commonly used to treat arthritis, actively inhibits DNA methylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases (59) and may ameliorate symptoms by up-regulation of silenced anti-inflammatory genes. While histone methylases and demethylases were only identified recently (60, 61), studies have also found that changes in histone methylation play an important role in inflammatory responses as well (62). Also of interest here are the recent findings demonstrating the role of hypoxia in epigenetic modification through the significant increase in global DNA methylation (63).

While histone methylases and demethylases were only identified recently (60, 61), the identification of site-specific histone demethylases demonstrates that histone methylation is a dynamic process, providing a mechanism for alteration of chromatin conformation in response to cellular stresses such as inflammation. Of particular interest here are the findings that at least two of these histone demethylase enzymes belonging to the Jumonji gene family, JMJD1A and JMJD2B, are induced by hypoxia in a HIFα-dependent manner (6467). These studies provide insight into new mechanisms for regulation of the cellular response to limiting O2 supply. Additionally, studies have also demonstrated important links between changes in histone methylation and cellular inflammatory responses as well (62).

Cellular methylation reactions include modification of DNA, RNA, proteins and lipids. These reactions all require a methyl donor for the modification of the target. The methyl donor for the majority of these reactions is S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) (68). SAM is distributed throughout the cell to act as donor for the various methylases. The donation of its methyl group produces S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) from SAM. SAH is a potent inhibitor of methyltransferase enzymes because these enzymes have a higher affinity for SAH (69) and SAH is rapidly converted to homocysteine and adenosine by SAH hydrolase. Therefore, inhibition of SAH hydrolase represents a powerful means of inhibiting cellular methylation reactions (70). It has been known for several years that inhibition of methylation had immunosuppressive (71). This led to the development of more specific, reversible, and less toxic SAH inhibitors for use in animal models of inflammation. Utilizing these compounds, it was demonstrated that SAH hydrolase inhibition particularly down-regulates T cell activation and adaptive immune responses. One of these SAH hydrolase inhibitors, DZ2002 [methyl 4-(adenin-9-yl)-2-hydroxybutanoate], has been found to have potent immunosuppressive effects and ameliorates disease in a number of animal models including delayed type hypersensitivity (72), arthritis (72), and EAE (73). Additionally, inhibition of SAH hydrolase has also been shown to influence cells of the innate immune system, particularly macrophages (74). These studies demonstrate that inhibition of antigen-induced immune responses.

Lipid Metabolism and Innate Immunity

A significant metabolic sink during inflammation and within the immune response involves the generation of lipid mediators. The majority of these short-live signaling molecules are generated by either cyclooxygenases or lipoxygenases. As their names might apply, these enzymatic responses require large amounts of oxygen, and as such can function to change intracellular metabolism in fundamental ways.

Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids (PUFAs) are essential to tissue homeostasis but cannot be synthesized in mammals, thus must be obtained from the diet. PUFAs have received much attention in recent years as the metabolism of omega-6 (ω-6) fatty acids appear to have opposing physiological consequences to omega-3 (ω-3) (75). Dietary ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids are converted by various desaturases and elongases to arachidonic acid (AA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), respectively, and incorporated into membrane phospholipids. Unsaturated fatty acids are liberated from membranes by phospholipase A2 (PLA2) and are further metabolized to generate what are considered pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g. eicosanoids, prostaglandins, thromboxanes, leukotrienes) and anti-inflammatory molecules (e.g. lipoxins, resolvins and protectins). As a general rule, ω-6 PUFAs give rise to pro-inflammatory lipids, whereas ω-3 PUFAs are metabolized to anti-inflammatory lipid mediators.

Oxygenases such as cyclooxygenases (COXs) and lipoxygenases are crucial oxygen-dependent, rate-limiting enzymes in the metabolism of PUFAs. COX catalyzes the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostaglandin G2 (PGG2) and subsequently converts PGG2 to PGH2 (76). PGH2 serves as the substrate for numerous enzymes, each resulting in a different PG end product. There are two known isoforms of cyclooxygenase – the COX-1 isoform is constitutively expressed, whereas COX-2 is thought to be inducible (77). As the name suggests, cyclooxygenase requires two molecules of oxygen to catalyzes the oxidation of arachidonic acid to PGG2 (78), thus it may seem intuitive that in an oxygen depleted environment, such as an inflammatory lesion, that eicosanoid production would be attenuated. Contradictory reports exist in the literature. Some groups observe that hypoxia increases COX-2 but not PGE2 (79, 80) or prostacyclin (81) levels. Others reports indicate that hypoxia paradoxically stimulates production of prostaglandins (82), likely via induction of COX-2 expression (83). Furthermore hypoxia has been demonstrated to increase cytosolic PLA2 activity, liberating more unsaturated fatty acids from lipid membranes to act as substrates for COX or lipoxygenases (84). This disparity between hypoxia-induced changes in PGE2 production may be due to tissue specificity, extenuating metabolic influences or even time-dependent sampling. A recent report examined the difference in PGE2 levels and COX-2 activity in acute and chronic periodontitis. Their findings indicated that PGE2 and COX-2 activity increase in acute disease but are suppressed in chronic disease states, which was mechanistically attributed to COX-2 promoter hypermethylation (85). Conversely, the contribution of diminished molecular oxygen in inflamed-hypoxic tissue to eicosanoid production has been poorly characterized. The affinities of various oxygenases for molecular O2 has been investigated, but the results appear to inconclusive (86).

Much recent attention has been paid to understanding lipid metabolism involved in the resolution of inflammation and in productive immune responses at mucosal sites. Of particular interest are series of cyclooxygenase-derived lipid mediators termed the resolvins and the maresins (87). Resolvins are the best understood of these molecules and are ω-3 PUFA-derived lipid mediators central to activation of the inflammatory resolution program (88). Among them, RvE1 was the first isolated and has been studied in the greatest detail. RvE1 displays potent stereoselective actions in vivo and in isolated cell systems. At nanomolar levels in vitro, RvE1 potently reduces human PMN transendothelial migration, dendritic cell (DC) migration and interleukin (IL)-12 production (87). In several animal models of inflammatory disease, RvE1 and more recently RvE2 (89) displays potent counter-regulatory actions that protect against leukocyte-mediated tissue injury, excessive pro-inflammatory gene expression. The discovery of a novel family of DHA-derived lipid mediators termed maresins (macrophage mediator in resolving inflammation: MaR) (90). MaR were identified from murine peritonitis exudates and human macrophages that biosynthesized a new class of lipoxygenase-derived lipids derived from endogenous DHA. MaR1 were demonstrated to promote inflammatory resolution with the potency of resolvins, reflected as decreased neutrophil accumulation and increased macrophage phagocytosis during murine peritonitis.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury is a major cause of tissue damage following stroke or transplantation, whereby reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation generated during hypoxia cause significant tissue damage upon reoxygenation. However, brief intermittent exposure to hypoxia (ischemic preconditioning, IPC) has been demonstrated to be protective. Adenosine, mentioned earlier, is generated during IPC and capable of eliciting anti-inflammatory effects (91). COX-2 is protective against ischemia/reperfusion injury, mediates late phase of preconditioning (92), possibly via PGE2 or prostacyclin (PGI2). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a sphingolipid signaling molecule that mediates cardioprotection during IPC (93). Sphingosine kinases catalyze the conversion of sphingosine to S1P, which binds to S1P G-protein coupled receptors to mediate cell survival signals. Both the SK1 (94) and SK2 (95) isoform of sphingosine kinase are upregulated in hypoxia, resulting in increased S1P. Concomitantly, conversion of sphingosine to S1P prevents its conversion to ceramide, a pro-apoptotic signaling lipid mediator (96).

Conclusion

The dynamic interplay of leukocytes and parenchymal cells during disease defines an elegant lesson in biology. In particular, studies of model disease systems have allowed for the identification of metabolomic changes now well accepted in the scientific literature. The discovery of differences and similarities between innate and adaptive immune responses will continue to teach us important lessons about the complexity of biological systems. Such information will provide previously unappreciated insight into the pathogenesis disease and importantly, will provide new targets as templates for the development of novel therapies for human disease.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants DK50189, DE016191, HL60569 and by grants from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America.

Footnotes

The authors declare no financial interests in any of the work submitted here.

References

  • 1.Taylor CT, Colgan SP. Hypoxia and gastrointestinal disease. J Mol Med. 2008;85:1295–1300. doi: 10.1007/s00109-007-0277-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lewis JS, Lee JA, Underwood JC, Harris AL, Lewis CE. Macrophage responses to hypoxia: relevance to disease mechanisms. J Leukoc Biol. 1999;66:889–900. doi: 10.1002/jlb.66.6.889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fox CJ, Hammerman PS, Thompson CB. Fuel feeds function: energy metabolism and the T-cell response. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:844–852. doi: 10.1038/nri1710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sitkovsky M, Lukashev D. Regulation of immune cells by local-tissue oxygen tension: HIF1 alpha and adenosine receptors. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005;5:712–721. doi: 10.1038/nri1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van Raam BJ, Sluiter W, de Wit E, Roos D, Verhoeven AJ, Kuijpers TW. Mitochondrial membrane potential in human neutrophils is maintained by complex III activity in the absence of supercomplex organisation. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pollard TD, Borisy GG. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell. 2003;112:453–465. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00120-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Borregaard N, Herlin T. Energy metabolism of human neutrophils during phagocytosis. J Clin Invest. 1982;70:550–557. doi: 10.1172/JCI110647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Greiner EF, Guppy M, Brand K. Glucose is essential for proliferation and the glycolytic enzyme induction that provokes a transition to glycolytic energy production. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:31484–31490. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Plas DR, Rathmell JC, Thompson CB. Homeostatic control of lymphocyte survival: potential origins and implications. Nat Immunol. 2002;3:515–521. doi: 10.1038/ni0602-515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gabig TG, Bearman SI, Babior BM. Effects of oxygen tension and pH on the respiratory burst of human neutrophils. Blood. 1979;53:1133–1139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kaelin WG, Jr, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol Cell. 2008;30:393–402. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Semenza GL. Regulation of oxygen homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Physiology (Bethesda) 2009;24:97–106. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00045.2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Semenza GL. HIF-1, O(2), and the 3 PHDs: how animal cells signal hypoxia to the nucleus. Cell. 2001;107:1–3. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00518-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, Clifford SC, Vaux EC, Cockman ME, Wykoff CC, Pugh CW, Maher ER, Ratcliffe PJ. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature. 1999;399:271–275. doi: 10.1038/20459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tanimoto K, Makino Y, Pereira T, Poellinger L. Mechanism of regulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. Embo J. 2000;19:4298–4309. doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.16.4298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lando D, Peet DJ, Whelan DA, Gorman JJ, Murray LW. Asparagine hydroxylation of the HIF transactivation domain: a hypoxic switch. Science. 2002;295:858–861. doi: 10.1126/science.1068592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang GL, Jiang BH, Rue EA, Semenza GL. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular oxygen tension. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1995;92:5510–5514. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ema M, Taya S, Yokotani N, Sogawa K, Matsuda Y, Fujii-Kuriyama Y. A novel bHLH-PAS factor with close sequence similarity to hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha regulates the VEGF expression and is potentially involved in lung and vascular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:4273–4278. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gu YZ, Moran SM, Hogenesch JB, Wartman L, Bradfield CA. Molecular characterization and chromosomal localization of a third alpha-class hypoxia inducible factor subunit, HIF3alpha. Gene Expr. 1998;7:205–213. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ratcliffe PJ. HIF-1 and HIF-2: working alone or together in hypoxia? J Clin Invest. 2007;117:862–865. doi: 10.1172/JCI31750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Epstein AC, Gleadle JM, McNeill LA, Hewitson KS, O’Rourke J, Mole DR, Mukherji M, Metzen E, Wilson MI, Dhanda A, Tian YM, Masson N, Hamilton DL, Jaakkola P, Barstead R, Hodgkin J, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ. C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell. 2001;107:43–54. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00507-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jaakkola P, Mole DR, Tian YM, Wilson MI, Gielbert J, Gaskell SJ, Kriegsheim A, Hebestreit HF, Mukherji M, Schofield CJ, Maxwell PH, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ. Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science. 2001;292:468–472. doi: 10.1126/science.1059796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bruick RK, McKnight SL. A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxylases that modify HIF. Science. 2001;294:1337–1340. doi: 10.1126/science.1066373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hon WC, Wilson MI, Harlos K, Claridge TD, Schofield CJ, Pugh CW, Maxwell PH, Ratcliffe PJ, Stuart DI, Jones EY. Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 alpha by pVHL. Nature. 2002;417:975–978. doi: 10.1038/nature00767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bruick RK. Oxygen sensing in the hypoxic response pathway: regulation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor. Genes Dev. 2003;17:2614–2623. doi: 10.1101/gad.1145503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mole DR, Schlemminger I, McNeill LA, Hewitson KS, Pugh CW, Ratcliffe PJ, Schofield CJ. 2-oxoglutarate analogue inhibitors of HIF prolyl hydroxylase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:2677–2680. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(03)00539-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Masson N, Ratcliffe PJ. HIF prolyl and asparaginyl hydroxylases in the biological response to intracellular O(2) levels. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:3041–3049. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2004;5:343–354. doi: 10.1038/nrm1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nwogu JI, Geenen D, Bean M, Brenner MC, Huang X, Buttrick PM. Inhibition of collagen synthesis with prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibitor improves left ventricular function and alters the pattern of left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001;104:2216–2221. doi: 10.1161/hc4301.097193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schlemminger I, Mole DR, McNeill LA, Dhanda A, Hewitson KS, Tian YM, Ratcliffe PJ, Pugh CW, Schofield CJ. Analogues of dealanylalahopcin are inhibitors of human HIF prolyl hydroxylases. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003;13:1451–1454. doi: 10.1016/s0960-894x(03)00149-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Makino Y, Nakamura H, Ikeda E, Ohnuma K, Yamauchi K, Yabe Y, Poellinger L, Okada Y, Morimoto C, Tanaka H. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates survival of antigen receptor-driven T cells. J Immunol. 2003;171:6534–6540. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.12.6534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nizet V, Johnson RS. Interdependence of hypoxic and innate immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:609–617. doi: 10.1038/nri2607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kong T, Eltzschig HK, Karhausen J, Colgan SP, Shelley CS. Leukocyte adhesion during hypoxia is mediated by HIF-1-dependent induction of beta2 integrin gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10440–10445. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401339101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Kong T, Scully M, Shelley CS, Colgan SP. Identification of Pur alpha as a new hypoxia response factor responsible for coordinated induction of the beta 2 integrin family. J Immunol. 2007;179:1934–1941. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Karhausen JO, Furuta GT, Tomaszewski JE, Johnson RS, Colgan SP, Haase VH. Epithelial hypoxia-inducible factor-1 is protective in murine experimental colitis. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:1098–1106. doi: 10.1172/JCI21086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shah YM, Ito S, Morimura K, Chen C, Yim SH, Haase VH, Gonzalez FJ. Hypoxia-inducible factor augments experimental colitis through an MIF-dependent inflammatory signaling cascade. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:2036–2048, 2048 e2031–2033. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cummins EP, Seeballuck F, Keely SJ, Mangan NE, Callanan JJ, Fallon PG, Taylor CT. The hydroxylase inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine is protective in a murine model of colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:156–165. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.10.012. Epub 2007 Oct 2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Robinson A, Keely S, Karhausen J, Gerich ME, Furuta GT, Colgan SP. Mucosal protection by hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibition. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:145–155. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.09.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Delgoffe GM, Powell JD. mTOR: taking cues from the immune microenvironment. Immunology. 2009;127:459–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03125.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Saemann MD, Haidinger M, Hecking M, Horl WH, Weichhart T. The Multifunctional Role of mTOR in Innate Immunity: Implications for Transplant Immunity. Am J Transplant. 2009 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02832.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Araki K, Turner AP, Shaffer VO, Gangappa S, Keller SA, Bachmann MF, Larsen CP, Ahmed R. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature. 2009;460:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature08155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Robson SC, Sevigny J, Zimmermann H. The E-NTPDase family of ectonucleotidases: Structure function relationships and pathophysiological significance. Purinergic Signal. 2006;2:409–430. doi: 10.1007/s11302-006-9003-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sexl V, Mancus G, Holler C, Gloria-Maercker E, Schutz W, Freissmuth M. Stimulation of the mitogen-activated protein-kinase via the A2A-adenosine receptor on primary human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:5792–5799. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.9.5792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Colgan SP, Eltzschig HK, Eckle T, Thompson LF. Physiologic roles for ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73) Purinergic Signalling. 2006;2:351–360. doi: 10.1007/s11302-005-5302-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Burnstock G. Purine and pyrimidine receptors. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007;64:1471–1483. doi: 10.1007/s00018-007-6497-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Eltzschig HK, Rivera-Nieves J, Colgan SP. Targeting the A2B adenosine receptor during gastrointestinal ischemia and inflammation. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2009;13:1267–1277. doi: 10.1517/14728220903241666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Naganuma M, Wiznerowicz EB, Lappas CM, Linden J, Worthington MT, Ernst PB. Cutting edge: Critical role for A2A adenosine receptors in the T cell-mediated regulation of colitis. J Immunol. 2006;177:2765–2769. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.5.2765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Frick JS, MacManus CF, Scully M, Glover LE, Eltzschig HK, Colgan SP. Contribution of adenosine A2B receptors to inflammatory parameters of experimental colitis. J Immunol. 2009;182:4957–4964. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0801324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kolachala VL, Vijay-Kumar M, Dalmasso G, Yang D, Linden J, Wang L, Gewirtz A, Ravid K, Merlin D, Sitaraman SV. A2B adenosine receptor gene deletion attenuates murine colitis. Gastroenterology. 2008;135:861–870. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.05.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Morgan HD, Santos F, Green K, Dean W, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum Mol Genet 14 Spec No. 2005;1:R47–58. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fraga MF, Ballestar E, Paz MF, Ropero S, Setien F, Ballestar ML, Heine-Suner D, Cigudosa JC, Urioste M, Benitez J, Boix-Chornet M, Sanchez-Aguilera A, Ling C, Carlsson E, Poulsen P, Vaag A, Stephan Z, Spector TD, Wu YZ, Plass C, Esteller M. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:10604–10609. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500398102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Laird PW. Cancer epigenetics. Hum Mol Genet 14 Spec No. 2005;1:R65–76. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ansel KM, Djuretic I, Tanasa B, Rao A. Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:607–656. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Djuretic IM, Levanon D, Negreanu V, Groner Y, Rao A, Ansel KM. Transcription factors T-bet and Runx3 cooperate to activate Ifng and silence Il4 in T helper type 1 cells. Nat Immunol. 2007;8:145–153. doi: 10.1038/ni1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Akimzhanov AM, Yang XO, Dong C. Chromatin remodeling of interleukin-17 (IL-17)-IL-17F cytokine gene locus during inflammatory helper T cell differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:5969–5972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C600322200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Floess S, Freyer J, Siewert C, Baron U, Olek S, Polansky J, Schlawe K, Chang HD, Bopp T, Schmitt E, Klein-Hessling S, Serfling E, Hamann A, Huehn J. Epigenetic control of the foxp3 locus in regulatory T cells. PLoS Biol. 2007;5:e38. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Foster SL, Hargreaves DC, Medzhitov R. Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature. 2007;447:972–978. doi: 10.1038/nature05836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Valinluck V, Sowers LC. Inflammation-mediated cytosine damage: a mechanistic link between inflammation and the epigenetic alterations in human cancers. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5583–5586. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-0846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Huber LC, Stanczyk J, Jungel A, Gay S. Epigenetics in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:3523–3531. doi: 10.1002/art.22948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hong S, Cho YW, Yu LR, Yu H, Veenstra TD, Ge K. Identification of JmjC domain-containing UTX and JMJD3 as histone H3 lysine 27 demethylases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:18439–18444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707292104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Trojer P, Reinberg D. Histone lysine demethylases and their impact on epigenetics. Cell. 2006;125:213–217. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.De Santa F, Totaro MG, Prosperini E, Notarbartolo S, Testa G, Natoli G. The histone H3 lysine-27 demethylase Jmjd3 links inflammation to inhibition of polycomb-mediated gene silencing. Cell. 2007;130:1083–1094. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Watson JA, Watson CJ, McCrohan AM, Woodfine K, Tosetto M, McDaid J, Gallagher E, Betts D, Baugh J, O’Sullivan J, Murrell A, Watson RW, McCann A. Generation of an epigenetic signature by chronic hypoxia in prostate cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2009;18:3594–3604. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Beyer S, Kristensen MM, Jensen KS, Johansen JV, Staller P. The histone demethylases JMJD1A and JMJD2B are transcriptional targets of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:36542–36552. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804578200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pollard PJ, Loenarz C, Mole DR, McDonough MA, Gleadle JM, Schofield CJ, Ratcliffe PJ. Regulation of Jumonji-domain-containing histone demethylases by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha. Biochem J. 2008;416:387–394. doi: 10.1042/BJ20081238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Wellmann S, Bettkober M, Zelmer A, Seeger K, Faigle M, Eltzschig HK, Buhrer C. Hypoxia upregulates the histone demethylase JMJD1A via HIF-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;372:892–897. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.05.150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Xia X, Lemieux ME, Li W, Carroll JS, Brown M, Liu XS, Kung AL. Integrative analysis of HIF binding and transactivation reveals its role in maintaining histone methylation homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:4260–4265. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810067106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Baldessarini RJ. Neuropharmacology of S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Am J Med. 1987;83:95–103. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90860-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Clarke S, Banfield K. S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases. 2001:63–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chiang PK. Biological effects of inhibitors of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Pharmacol Ther. 1998;77:115–134. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(97)00089-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Wolos JA, Frondorf KA, Babcock GF, Stripp SA, Bowlin TL. Immunomodulation by an inhibitor of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase: inhibition of in vitro and in vivo allogeneic responses. Cell Immunol. 1993;149:402–408. doi: 10.1006/cimm.1993.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Saso Y, Conner EM, Teegarden BR, Yuan CS. S-Adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase inhibitor mediates immunosuppressive effects in vivo: suppression of delayed type hypersensitivity ear swelling and peptidoglycan polysaccharide-induced arthritis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001;296:106–112. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lawson BR, Manenkova Y, Ahamed J, Chen X, Zou JP, Baccala R, Theofilopoulos AN, Yuan C. Inhibition of transmethylation down-regulates CD4 T cell activation and curtails development of autoimmunity in a model system. J Immunol. 2007;178:5366–5374. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.5366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Wu QL, Fu YF, Zhou WL, Wang JX, Feng YH, Liu J, Xu JY, He PL, Zhou R, Tang W, Wang GF, Zhou Y, Yang YF, Ding J, Li XY, Chen XR, Yuan C, Lawson BR, Zuo JP. Inhibition of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase induces immunosuppression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005;313:705–711. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.080416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bagga D, Wang L, Farias-Eisner R, Glaspy JA, Reddy ST. Differential effects of prostaglandin derived from omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on COX-2 expression and IL-6 secretion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:1751–1756. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0334211100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Ueno N, Murakami M, Tanioka T, Fujimori K, Tanabe T, Urade Y, Kudo I. Coupling between cyclooxygenase, terminal prostanoid synthase, and phospholipase A2. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:34918–34927. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100429200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Vane JR, Bakhle YS, Botting RM. Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1998;38:97–120. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.38.1.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Filimonov IS, Vrzheshch PV. Molecular oxygen (a substrate of the cyclooxygenase reaction) in the kinetic mechanism of the bifunctional enzyme prostaglandin-H-synthase. Biochemistry (Mosc) 2007;72:944–953. doi: 10.1134/s0006297907090040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Demasi M, Cleland LG, Cook-Johnson RJ, Caughey GE, James MJ. Effects of hypoxia on monocyte inflammatory mediator production: Dissociation between changes in cyclooxygenase-2 expression and eicosanoid synthesis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:38607–38616. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305944200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Schwartzman ML, Bonazzi A, Mieyal P, Mezentsev A, Abraham NG, Dunn MW. COX-2 lack of function in hypoxia-induced ocular surface inflammation. Thromb Res. 2003;110:293–298. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(03)00415-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Juranek I, Bauer V, Donnerer J, Lembeck F, Peskar BA. Severe hypoxia inhibits prostaglandin I(2) biosynthesis and vasodilatory responses induced by ionophore A23187 in the isolated rabbit ear. Pharmacology. 2002;66:199–205. doi: 10.1159/000065534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Michiels C, Arnould T, Knott I, Dieu M, Remacle J. Stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis by human endothelial cells exposed to hypoxia. Am J Physiol. 1993;264:C866–C874. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.4.C866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Schmedtje JF, Ji YS, Liu WL, DuBois RN, Runge MS. Hypoxia induces cyclooxygenase-2 via the NF-kappaB p65 transcription factor in human vascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:601–608. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.1.601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Barnett JM, McCollum G, Penn JS. The Role of Cytosolic Phospholipase A2 in Retinal Neovascularization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009 doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-3691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Zhang S, Barros SP, Niculescu MD, Moretti AJ, Preisser JS, Offenbacher S. Alteration of PTGS2 promoter methylation in chronic periodontitis. J Dent Res. 2009;89:133–137. doi: 10.1177/0022034509356512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Juranek I, Suzuki H, Yamamoto S. Affinities of various mammalian arachidonate lipoxygenases and cyclooxygenases for molecular oxygen as substrate. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1999;1436:509–518. doi: 10.1016/s0005-2760(98)00159-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Serhan CN, Chiang N, Van Dyke TE. Resolving inflammation: dual anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution lipid mediators. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8:349–361. doi: 10.1038/nri2294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Serhan CN, Clish CB, Brannon J, Colgan SP, Chiang N, Gronert K. Novel functional sets of lipid-derived mediators with antiinflammatory actions generated from omega-3 fatty acids via cyclooxygenase 2- nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and transcellular processing. J Exp Med. 2000;192:1197–1204. doi: 10.1084/jem.192.8.1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Spite M, Norling LV, Summers L, Yang R, Cooper D, Petasis NA, Flower RJ, Perretti M, Serhan CN. Resolvin D2 is a potent regulator of leukocytes and controls microbial sepsis. Nature. 2009;461:1287–1291. doi: 10.1038/nature08541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Serhan CN, Yang R, Martinod K, Kasuga K, Pillai PS, Porter TF, Oh SF, Spite M. Maresins: novel macrophage mediators with potent antiinflammatory and proresolving actions. J Exp Med. 2009;206:15–23. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Khoury J, Ibla JC, Neish AS, Colgan SP. Antiinflammatory adaptation to hypoxia through adenosine-mediated cullin-1 deneddylation. J Clin Invest. 2007;117:703–711. doi: 10.1172/JCI30049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Bolli R, Shinmura K, Tang XL, Kodani E, Xuan YT, Guo Y, Dawn B. Discovery of a new function of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: COX-2 is a cardioprotective protein that alleviates ischemia/reperfusion injury and mediates the late phase of preconditioning. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;55:506–519. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00414-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Vessey DA, Li L, Honbo N, Karliner JS. Sphingosine 1-phosphate is an important endogenous cardioprotectant released by ischemic pre- and postconditioning. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009;297:H1429–1435. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00358.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Anelli V, Gault CR, Cheng AB, Obeid LM. Sphingosine kinase 1 is up-regulated during hypoxia in U87MG glioma cells. Role of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:3365–3375. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708241200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Schnitzer SE, Weigert A, Zhou J, Brune B. Hypoxia enhances sphingosine kinase 2 activity and provokes sphingosine-1-phosphate-mediated chemoresistance in A549 lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2009;7:393–401. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-08-0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Cuvillier O, Pirianov G, Kleuser B, Vanek PG, Coso OA, Gutkind S, Spiegel S. Suppression of ceramide-mediated programmed cell death by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Nature. 1996;381:800–803. doi: 10.1038/381800a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES