Abstract
We present a case of a 49-year-old man, with a 10-year history of bronchial asthma and nasal polyposis, who developed acutely painful paraplegia and paresthesias. Laboratory data showed elevated blood creatine kinase levels and myoglobinuria, which were diagnostic for rhabdomyolysis but only partially explained the neurological deficit. Electrophysiological studies revealed a sensorimotor neuropathy of multiple mononeuritis type. The patient also had leucocytosis with marked eosinophilia and antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies. Bronchial biopsies showed inflammatory infiltrates with a prevalence of eosinophils. All these findings led us to diagnose eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, a systemic vasculitis with almost constant respiratory tract involvement and good response to corticosteroid treatment. This can also affect other organs including the nervous system, while muscular involvement is unusual. Some diseases deserve attention in differential diagnosis. Histology can support the diagnosis which remains essentially clinical. Steroid sparing agents/immunosuppressants are suggested for extensive disease.
Background
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a rare small-vessel vasculitic disease, previously called Churg-Strauss syndrome or allergic granulomatosis angiitis.1 2 The most frequent clinical manifestations are respiratory tract involvement (75%) such as bronchial asthma (which is an almost universal feature), allergic rhinitis and pulmonary infiltrates, associated with marked peripheral hypereosinophilia. EGPA is histologically characterised by a necrotising vasculitis with eosinophilic infiltration and extravascular granuloma formation in tissues. It may be present with multiple mononeuritis (65–75%), gastrointestinal, cardiac, dermatological and renal involvement, while muscular involvement is unusual.1
Case presentation
A 49-year-old man experienced a fever (38°C) with intense myalgia and weakness of both lower limbs. After a couple of days these symptoms also affected the right upper limb and included paresthesias, so he presented to the emergency room. He had never smoked and had a 10-year history of asthma treated with local and systemic steroids plus antileukotriene agents (Montelukast 10 mg/day for several years), and nasal polyposis treated with surgery. Blood tests dating back several years before admission showed the presence of eosinophilia up to 4000 cells/μL (normal <500 cells/μL). On admission the patient had a global muscle weakness predominant on the proximal muscle groups of lower limbs, associated with diffuse myalgia, paraesthesias in the right median nerve territory and hypoaesthesia in glove to pinprick in his right hand. Chest examination revealed slightly decreased breath sounds to auscultation bilaterally. Vital signs and the remainder of the examination were normal.
Investigations
Blood tests showed high white cell count (WBC: 40.680 cells/μL), elevated serum creatine kinase (CPK: 1226 UI/L, normal <170), marked peripheral eosinophilia (23.510 cells/μL), elevated serum IgE: 1397 KU/L, normal <25 KU/L) and high inflammatory indices with C reactive protein (CRP) 180.5 mg/L, normal <5 mg/L. The remaining haematological and biochemical profiles were normal.
His chest X-ray showed bilateral areas of hazy increased opacities, mainly in the lower lung fields (figure 1A). Cardiac and mediastinal silhouettes were normal. A chest CT revealed bilateral pulmonary infiltrations and cystic bronchiectasis with diffusely thickened walls in the lower lung lobes, partly occupied by dense content without contrast enhancement (figure 2). ECG and echocardiogram were entirely normal.
Figure 1.

Chest X-ray showed bilateral parenchymal hazy opacities, mainly at the lower lung fields (A), partially regressed in the control after 2 weeks (B).
Figure 2.

CT of chest showing diffuse bilateral infiltrates.
A video bronchoscopy was performed and cytological findings of the bronchial aspirate from the left main bronchus showed numerous leucocytes and eosinophils, as well as cylindrical cells, alveolar macrophages and erythrocytes.
Bronchial mucosa biopsies showed several mixed inflammatory infiltrates, with prevalence of eosinophils, some of which assembled in intraepithelial microabscesses. The endoscopic sinus examination showed nasal polyps, hyperplasia, inflammatory changes and oedema of the mucosa, which supported the previous diagnosed sinusitis. A histological examination of the nasal mucosa was not available because technical difficulties did not allow the execution of biopsy in time (before the start of therapy).
Lung function tests showed mild airway obstruction (FEV1/VC 68%; FEV1 85%), with a positive response to the bronchodilator reversibility test: FEV1 increase of 413 mL (13%) after administration of salbutamol 200 mcg by metered-dose index.
The elevated blood CPK levels and myoglobinuria were diagnostic for rhabdomyolysis, but only partially explained the neuromuscular defect. Electroneuromyography showed sensorimotor axonal polyneuropathy. ANCA with a perinuclear staining pattern (p-ANCA), the main autoantibodies in EGPA, were positive; in particular MPO-ANCA (p-ANCA with anti-myeloperoxidase specificity) were 176.2 UR/mL (normal <18 UR/mL). The screening for parasitic infections was negative.
Differential diagnosis
Possible causes of non-traumatic acute or subacute paraplegia include: (1) spinal diseases (vascular, inflammatory, neoplastic); (2) non-spinal disorders, such as polyradiculitis (Guillain-Barré syndrome), hyperkalaemic and hypokalaemic paralysis and psychogenic paraplegia.
In our case neuroimaging with MRI of the spinal cord was unremarkable, whereas the collection of clinical data was highly suggestive of the diagnosis of EGPA. In particular, the patient met all of the six criteria proposed by the American College of Rheumatology: asthma, eosinophilia >10%, neuropathy, non-fixed pulmonary infiltrates, paranasal sinus abnormality and extravascular eosinophils (the presence of any four or more of them yields a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 99.7%).3 Thus, a specific treatment was started. Because of the complete reversibility of muscle symptoms no further investigations were undertaken; in particular, muscle biopsy was not carried out.
Treatment
A broad-spectrum antibiotic (levofloxacin 500 mg once daily) was initiated on admission since the patient presented with fever and leucocytosis. Faced with the highly probable EGPA vasculitis, 3 days after admission we added 1 g/day of methylprednisolone intravenously. The patient experienced a progressive improvement of myalgia and muscle weakness; the disappearance of fever and a reduction in the blood eosinophilic count and in markers of systemic inflammatory response were observed in a few days, as well as the normalisation of CPK. Chest X-ray control showed partial regression of parenchymal consolidations (figure 1B). Forced diuresis was used to decrease the risk of myoglobin-induced renal damage.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient was discharged taking prednisone 1 mg/kg/day orally and 2 weeks later he begun tapering it. He was also prescribed a biphosphonate to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis and a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) as prophylaxis for oesophageal-gastric pathology. Montelukast was discontinued. A chest CT performed 3 months after discharge showed the complete disappearance of pulmonary cloudiness, while spirometric parameters were stable. However, 8 months after discharge a relapse of disease occurred with asthma exacerbation and recurrence of paresthesias at the lower limbs. A therapy with cyclophosphamide was consequently undertaken and corticosteroid again increased to 1 mg/kg/day. A new remission was obtained within 4 weeks, Prednisone was tapered to 10 mg/day and intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) was continued for 6 months.
Discussion
Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis is a potentially fatal disease, affecting small-sized and medium-sized vessels. Its prevalence ranges from 10.7 to 13 per million in adults; annual incidence is lower than 10 new cases per million inhabitants in the general population, but it is about 10 times higher in asthmatic subjects.4
EGPA diagnosis is essentially carried out on a clinical basis and can be confirmed by histology.5 The American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosis of EGPA include bronchial asthma, blood eosinophilia >10%, mononeuropathy or polyneuropathy, non-fixed pulmonary infiltrates, paranasal sinus abnormalities and histological evidence of extravascular eosinophils. The presence of any four or more of these six criteria indicates that a patient has EGPA with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 99.7%.3 Other frequent systemic manifestations include fever, weight loss, cutaneous lesions such as purpura and subcutaneous nodules. Moreover, patients can experience: gastrointestinal system involvement with abdominal pain, diarrhoea or bleeding; heart involvement with congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy and pericardial effusion; and/or kidney involvement with focal segmental glomerulonephritis, usually of mild relevance.6 Blood eosinophilia is present in every patient with EGPA and is usually extremely high, averaging greater than 1000 cells/μL. A proportion that goes from half to two thirds of patients have a positive p-ANCA test result,7 whereas a positivity for PR3-ANCA or more generically cytoplasmic staining pattern (c-ANCA) is more common in Wegener's granulomatosis.
According to some authors, the disease often develops through three stages: a prodromal phase characterised by allergic rhinitis that may be present for several years and that is followed by asthma; a second phase with blood and tissue eosinophilia and eosinophilic pneumonia or gastroenteritis; and a third phase characterised by systemic vasculitis.5
Our case suggests that the occurrence of myalgia, weakness and paresthesias of limbs in the context of systemic inflammation with hypereosinophilia should lead to considering the diagnosis of EGPA and to prompt corticosteroid treatment. Muscle involvement in EGPA is rare8 but can be the first manifestation of a systemic vasculitis. The transient muscle weakness and pains observed in our patient in association with the elevated CPK and the response to corticosteroid treatment were considered likely to reflect such a process. Rhabdomyolysis is a condition in which damaged skeletal muscle tissue breaks down rapidly. Breakdown products of damaged muscle cells are released into the bloodstream; some of these, such as the myoglobin, are harmful to the kidneys and may lead to acute renal failure (for the prevention of which we administered hydration and diuretics).
The most common chest radiographic findings of EGPA comprise transient patchy alveolar opacities, whereas rarely a diffuse interstitial infiltrates or nodular densities can be observed.9 In our case, the execution of chest CT allowed us to better define the radiographic abnormalities present on admission; it probably would not have been necessary if the patient had presented only the symptoms of an asthma exacerbation without systemic manifestations suggesting EGPA.
Some diseases share various aspects of EGPA and deserve attention in the differential diagnosis of lung disorders with blood eosinophilia (table 1). Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is most likely the leading condition to distinguish from EGPA, since it is relatively common and often has less severe clinical consequences. It usually occurs in subjects with asthma, but the level of eosinophilia is generally not as high as in EGPA.10 Even if there may be eosinophil infiltration of blood vessel walls, this aspect is modest, whereas necrotising vasculitis and necrotising granulomas are absent. Extrathoracic features are absent in ICEP. When the symptoms and signs of extra-pulmonary involvement are present, a diagnosis of EGPA or idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (IHS) should be considered. It is likely that in some patients a continuum exists between ICEP and EGPA.
Table 1.
Features helpful in the differential diagnosis of CSS
| EGPA (CSS) | ICEP | HES | BCG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extrapulmonary involvement | Yes, (neurological, gastrointestinal, cardiac, dermatological, renal) | No | Yes | No |
| Asthma | Yes | Frequent | No | Frequent |
| Blood eosinophilia | Marked | Frequent | Marked | Yes |
| ANCA positivity | 50-70% of cases | No | No | No |
| Eosinophilic pneumonia | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Necrotising vasculitis | Yes | No | No | No |
| Necrotising granuloma | Yes | No | No | Yes (lesions centre on and replace bronchioles) |
BCG, bronchocentric granulomatosis; EGPA (CSS), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangitis (Churg-Strauss syndrome); HES, hypereosinophilic syndrome; ICEP, idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia.
Hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) is a myeloproliferative disorder characterised by persistent blood and bone marrow eosinophilia, and is associated with tissue infiltration by eosinophils and damage to multiple organs (heart, skin, nervous system, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, liver and spleen).11 There may be some overlap with EGPA, but commonly HES differs from EGPA clinically by the absence of asthma and histopathologically by the absence of vasculitis and granulomas.
Bronchocentric granulomatosis (BCG) is a rare disease characterised by a destructive granulomatous lesion of the bronchi and bronchioles that is supposed to represent a non-specific response to several types of airway injury. The cause is unknown in approximately half the cases, while the other half is associated with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.12 As in EGPA, patients generally have asthma, eosinophilia, pulmonary infiltrates and systemic symptoms. Lung biopsy also shows necrotising granulomatous inflammation that differs from EGPA because of its typically bronchocentric location. Blood eosinophilia in BCG is usually not as great as in EGPA, and extrapulmonary involvement is not a feature.
Five factors are classically recognised as important for prognosis: proteinuria >1 g/24 h, serum creatinine >1.58 mg/dL, gastrointestinal tract involvement, cardiomyopathy and CNS involvement. The treatment of EGPA without any poor-prognosis factors traditionally consists of corticosteroid monotherapy.13 People with severe disease may require an adjuvant immunosuppressive drug such as cyclophosphamide, azathioprine or methotrexate to reduce the body’s immune reaction still further.14–16 Such drugs may also be used as steroid-sparing agents in order to reduce corticosteroids with their side effects. Even if muscle disease is not specifically contained within the classical scoring system, its presence could justify a therapeutic regimen including an immunosuppressant since diagnosis. Once EGPA was almost always a fatal disease; corticosteroids and immunosuppressants have considerably improved the prognoses and overall survival rates. Since our patient was in treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs), which have been reported to be a possible trigger of EGPA,17 we discontinued this drug after admission. However, it should be noted that there may be multiple non-causative reasons for an association between LTRAs and EGPA, such as their broad use in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis (including those who are already in the process of developing EGPA), or the reduction in corticosteroid dosage in patients using LTRAs, which in turn allows the EGPA to be unmasked.
Learning points.
Paraplegia is a rare but possible presentation of a systemic vasculitis such as eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).
The laboratory and histological data may support the diagnosis of EGPA, but it remains essentially clinical.
A diagnosis of EGPA should be suspected in case of bronchial asthma, allergic rhinitis and systemic inflammation with hypereosinophilia.
The treatment of EGPA traditionally consists of corticosteroid monotherapy. Other immunosuppressive drugs may be used in people with severe disease or as steroid-sparing agents.
Footnotes
Acknowledgements: We thank our colleagues Tiziana Cappelletti, Vincenzo Corbelli and Giuseppina Alfieri from S Anna Hospital for their valuable input.
Contributors: We state that all authors contributed to: conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data; drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and final approval of the version published.
Competing interests: None.
Patient consent: Obtained.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
References
- 1.Churg J, Strauss L. Allergic granulomatosis, allergic angiitis, and periarteritis nodosa. Am J Pathol 1951;27:277–301 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Noth I, Strek ME, Leff AR. Churg-Strauss syndrome. Lancet 2003;361:587–94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Masi AT, Hunder GG, Lie JT, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of Churg-Strauss syndrome (allergic granulomatosis and angiitis). Arthritis Rheum 1990;33:1094–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Watts RA, Lane SE, Bentham G, et al. Epidemiology of systemic vasculitis: a ten-year study in the United Kingdom. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43:414–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lanham JG, Elkon KB, Pusey CD, et al. Systemic vasculitis with asthma and eosinophilia: a clinical approach to the Churg-Strauss syndrome. Medicine 1984;63:65–81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lhote F, Guillevin L. Polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis, and Churg-Strauss syndrome: clinical aspects and treatment. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1995;21:911–47 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jennette JC, Falk RJ. Small-vessel vasculitis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:1512–23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.De Vlam K, De Keyser F, Goemaere S, et al. Churg-Strauss syndrome presenting as polymyositis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1995;13:505–7 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Choi YH, Im J-G, Han BK, et al. Thoracic manifestation of Churg-Strauss syndrome: radiologic and clinical findings. Chest 2000;117:117–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Allen JN, Davis WB. Eosinophilic lung diseases. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:1423–38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Weller PF, Bubley GJ. The idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome. Blood 1994;83:2759–79 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bosken CH, Myers JL, Greenberger PA, et al. Pathologic features of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Am J Surg Pathol 1988;12:216–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gross W. Churg–Strauss syndrome: update on recent developments. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2002;14:11–14 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Langford CA, Klippel JH, Balow JE, et al. Use of cytotoxic agents and cyclosporine in the treatment of autoimmune disease: part 2: inflammatory bowel disease, systemic vasculitis, and therapeutic toxicity. Ann Intern Med 1998;129:49–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fauci A, Katz P, Haynes B, et al. Cyclophosphamide therapy of severe necrotizing vasculitis. N Engl J Med 1979;301:235–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gayraud M, Guillevin L, Toumelin P, The French Vasculitis Study Group et al. ; Long term follow-up of polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis and Churg–Strauss syndrome. Analysis of four prospective trials including 278 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:666–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Keogh KA. Leukotriene receptor antagonists and Churg-Strauss syndrome: cause, trigger or merely an association? Drug Saf 2007;30:837–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
