Abstract
Objective:
Oxytocin routinely used as an uterotonic drug in cesarean delivery. Clothing problems, adverse effects on fibrinogen and bleeding were presented as side effects of oxytocin. In in vivo investigation, modest hypercoagulable state was suggested as a side effect for infusion of oxytocin in parturients. In this study, effects of two different infusion rates of oxytocin on coagulation of parturient were evaluated during cesarean delivery.
Methods:
In a randomized double-blinded clinical trial, 84 healthy parturient in two equal groups took oxytocin infusion with the rate of 15 IU/h (Group A) or 30 IU/h (Group B), after the umbilical cord clamping. Coagulation status measured 30 min after beginning of infusion by thromboelastography. Data were analyzed by χ2, paired sample test and ANOVA considering as significant at P < 0.05.
Findings:
The mean (standard deviation) of variables in Groups A and B were 2.4024 (0.86) and 2.0429 (0.68) for K (kinetics of clot development), 55.4429 (11.30) and 60.7595 (10.41) for α (speed of clot strengthening) and 59.779 (19.15) and 70.61 (11.30) for maximum amplitude (maximum clot strength), respectively. The P values for these variables were 0.036, 0.028 and <0.001, respectively; these changes are consistent with increasing coagulability. Other measures did not have significant differences.
Conclusion:
This in vivo investigation clarified that increasing infusion rate of oxytocin to 30 IU/h can augment coagulability in term parturients.
Keywords: Cesarean delivery, coagulation, Oxytocin, thromboelastography
INTRODUCTION
The rate of delivery by cesarean section has increased dramatically in developed[1,2,3] and developing[4,5] countries since four decades ago and now it is one of the most commonly performed major operations in women throughout the world.[6] Postpartum hemorrhage can follow vaginal delivery or cesarean section and it is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality[7,8,9] in most cases which relates to uterine atony.[10,11,12]
In the management protocol of treatment of uterine atony or hypotony, administration of oxytocin is in early steps,[13,14,15] in addition, oxytocin is routinely used as an uterotonic for prophylaxis.[16,17,18]
The guidelines of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists on cesarean section recommend a slow intravenous bolus dose of 5 IU of oxytocin after delivery of the infant.[19]
In settings where an oxytocin bolus is used routinely, an additional infusion of oxytocin may be required if hemorrhage occurs.[20] An alternative practice in the United States recommends the use of an oxytocin infusion instead of a bolus dose.[21]
Clothing problems, adverse effects on fibrinogen and bleeding were presented as side-effects of oxytocin.[22,23,24] The frequency and mechanism of these side-effects is poorly understood.[25]
In an in vitro study, Butwick studied the effects of two different infusion rates of oxytocin on clot formation in whole blood of healthy term parturients by thromboelastography and concluded that exogenous oxytocin is associated with modest hypercoagulable effects in the maternal blood.[26]
Butwick finding is in contrast to the known side-effects and adverse reactions of oxytocin on coagulation[22,23,24] and was based on an in vitro investigation, so this clinical trial designed to evaluate the effects of two different infusion rates of oxytocin on coagulation and clot formation of healthy parturients in an in vivo study by thrombolelastography.
METHODS
After approval by the ethical committee and obtaining informed concept, 126 parturient who were a candidate for elective cesarean section were assessed for eligibility to be included in the study. A total of 35 patients did not accept spinal anesthesia for their delivery, one of them had anatomical abnormality in her spine and 6 parturients were suffering from diabetes and hypertension, so finally 84 of assessed patients entered to this prospective randomized double blinded clinical trial in a simple sampling method.
Participants had American society of anesthesiologists health status classification 1 and 2 and gestational age between 36 and 40 weeks without sign, symptoms and history of coagulation abnormality; also patients who took magnesium sulfate or non-steroidal anti-inflammation drugs in recent week or spinal column abnormality did not match the inclusion criteria of the study. Need to more doses of oxytocin or other drugs for enhancing uterus contraction, transfusion of blood products and administration of magnesium sulfate or calcium gluconate (or chloride) during section were excluding criteria of the study.
All participants were fasted for 8 h before section and took 2 mL/kg fluids (1/3 dextrose, 2/3 saline) during this period. After positioning of participant on the operating table (in 15° leftward tilt), standard monitoring was applied to all participants including electrocardiography, blood pressure, temperature and saturation of hemoglobin by oxygen (SpO2) and basal vital signs measured, then 10 mL/kg ringer's lactate solution infused before spinal anesthesia.
Spinal anesthesia was performed in a sitting position by injection of 12.5 mg of bupivacaine (without barbotage) at the L2-L3 or L3-L4 interspace through midline approach with a 25-gauge Quincke needle. Patients were placed in the supine position (in 15° leftward tilt) after spinal anesthesia. Supplemental oxygen was administered (5-8 L/min) through a face mask.
Flow Chart 1.
CONSORT diagram of the study
Patients randomly divided in two groups according to the random list generated by randomized allocation software[27] to take their special coded drug. After delivery and clamping of umbilical cord, 2 μg/kg fentanyl and 1-2 mg midazolam prescribed intravenously as sedative. Infusion of oxytocin (Oxytip®, Caspaitamin, Tehran, Iran) begun by infusing coded syringe through infusion pump in a similar rate of 60 mL/h in all participants. Oxytocin were prepared in similar 60 mL infusion pump syringes by a coworker of study in two concentrations (0.25 IU/mL for Group A and 0.5 IU/mL for Group B) and coded according to cods created by randomized allocation software. All codes remained unclear for other co-workers of the study until the end of collecting data period.
At 30 min after beginning of infusion of oxytocin, 2 mL of participant blood were taken in atraumatized manner from the antecubital vein and immediately tested by thromboelastography in the operating room lab. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure, respiratory rate (breaths per minute), temperature (measured by coated probe from axillary fossa) and SpO2 were measured and recorded every 5 min during surgery.
Uterus contraction scored by a surgeon as relax, semi-contract, contract and full contract after delivery of the placenta and before returning of the uterus to the abdominal cavity. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) was treated with a rapid infusion of crystalloid solution and if unresolved in 5 min, it was treated with ephedrine (5 mg-venous bolus); also, heart rate under 50 beat/min without hypotension was treated by intravenous administration of 1 mg bolus dose of atropine. All these interventions were recorded in dose and times of prescription. The maximum level of sensory block was evaluated 20 min after the end of bupivacaine injection.
At the end of collecting data (in all participants), codes of randomization opened and data analyzed by Chi-square, paired sample test and repeated measured ANOVA in the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) version 20. Differences considered significant at level of 0.05.
RESULTS
This study evaluated coagulation status in 84 parturients during cesarean section. The mean standard deviation (SD) of parturient age, parity and gestational ages of all participants were 28.5 (4.63) years, 2.29 (0.86) and 37.45 (0.55) weeks, respectively. Two groups of the study didn't show significant differences in comparison of means of age (P = 0.963) and frequency distribution of parity (P = 0.079) and gestational ages (P = 0.111) [Table 1].
Table 1.
Frequency distribution of participants regarding parity and gestational ages
The results of this study demonstrated that infusion of oxytocin 15 unit/h and 30 unit/h have different effects on measures of thromboelastography regarding the mean of K (the time between initiation of clot formation to 20 mm widening of two branches of thromboelastorgraphy curve) the mean of α (the angle between two branches of thromboelastorgraphy curve) and the mean of maximal amplitude (MA) (the MA of thromboelastorgraphy curve) in two groups [Table 2]. Other measures of thromboelastography didn't show significant differences in two groups.
Table 2.
Mean of thromboelastographic parameters in two study groups
Participants in two groups did not have significant differences in temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, SpO2, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures before induction of anesthesia and during the surgery [Figure 1].
Figure 1.
Mean of SpO2 (saturation of hemoglobin by oxygen), Blood pressures (systolic, diastolic and mean), heart rate and temperature during cesarean section in two study groups (Group A = Receiving oxytocin 15 units/h, Group B = Receiving oxytocin 30 units/h)
The mean dose of ephedrine for treating hypotension was similar in both groups; also the mean dose of midazolam and fentanyl did not have any significant differences between two groups [Table 3].
Table 3.
Mean doses of ephedrine, midazolam and fentanyl used in two study groups
DISCUSSION
The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vivo effects of two different infusion rates of oxytocin on parturient coagulation by thromboelastography; in this double blinded clinical trial, we found that oxytocin infusion at a rate of 30 IU/h in comparison to 15 IU/h causes a significant decrease in K and increase in α and MA variables of thromboelastography. These changes are according to increase in coagulability. In fact, in thromboelastography, K represents the kinetics of clot development, α reflects the speed of clot strengthening, mostly affected by fibrinogen levels and in a lesser degree by platelet function and MA represents the maximum clot strength, mainly affected by platelet function and to a lesser extent by fibrin.[28] Therefore, probably the mechanisms of effects of oxytocin on coagulation are through affecting platelet function (such as increasing aggregation) and enhancing degradation of fibrinogen to fibrin.
Our results in major parts are in line with Butwick findings.[26] Their study showed a decrease of R and K and increase in α and MA, but in the present study, R did not have significant differences in two groups. Differences in R changes between Butwick and the present study can be related to differences in the kind of these two studies, whereas Butwick study was an in vitro research but we did our study in vivo.
In several drug information resources, adverse effects on hemostasis such as afibrinogenemia, hematoma formation and bleeding are mentioned for oxytocin;[22,23,24,25] while in this study these kinds of complications have not been evaluated, but our findings (decreasing of K and increasing of α and MA in increased oxytocin infusion rate group) can be translated to augmentation of coagulation by higher levels of oxytocin which may not support the mentioned side-effects for oxytocin.
This in vivo investigation clarified that increasing infusion rate of oxytocin to 30 IU/h can augment coagulability in term parturients. We did not study the effects of bolus doses of oxytocin (a more common approach for prescribing oxytocin in cesarean section) on coagulation and did not follow patients for evaluating postpartum bleeding or hematoma formation, which can be the subject for future studies in this field.
AUTHOR'S CONTRIBUTION
Golparvar M. MD: Data base search, Idea of study, Proposal preparation, Manuscript writing, Revisions correction and writing. Esterabi M. MD: Proposal preparation, Data collection, Manuscript writing. Talakoub R. MD: Data base search, Data collection, Manuscript writing. Saryazdi H. H. MD: Idea of study, Data collection, Manuscript writing.
Footnotes
Source of Support: This works is funded by the research department, faculty of medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, through the research project number 392297
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Tollånes MC. Increased rate of Caesarean sections-Causes and consequences. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2009;129:1329–31. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.08.0453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fairley L, Dundas R, Leyland AH. The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980-2000. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:330. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Alves B, Sheikh A. Investigating the relationship between affluence and elective caesarean sections. BJOG. 2005;112:994–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Thomas J, Paranjothy S. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. National sentinel caesarean section audit report. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. BMJ. 2004;328:665. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cai WW, Marks JS, Chen CH, Zhuang YX, Morris L, Harris JR. Increased cesarean section rates and emerging patterns of health insurance in Shanghai, China. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:777–80. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.5.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Kirmeyer S, et al. Births: Final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;58:1–85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ibrahim M, Ziegler C, Klam SL, Wieczorek P, Abenhaim HA. Incidence, indications, and predictors of adverse outcomes of postpartum hysterectomies: 20-year experience in a tertiary care centre. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:14–20. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30679-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mehrabadi A, Liu S, Bartholomew S, Hutcheon JA, Kramer MS, Liston RM, et al. Temporal trends in postpartum hemorrhage and severe postpartum hemorrhage in Canada from 2003 to 2010. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36:21–33. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30680-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mousa HA, Alfirevic Z. Treatment for primary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;1:CD003249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003249.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Montufar-Rueda C, Rodriguez L, Jarquin JD, Barboza A, Bustillo MC, Marin F, et al. Severe postpartum hemorrhage from uterine atony: A multicentric study. J Pregnancy. 2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/525914. Article ID 525914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dildy GA., 3rd Postpartum hemorrhage: New management options. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45:330–44. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200206000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Combs CA, Murphy EL, Laros RK., Jr Factors associated with postpartum hemorrhage with vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:69–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bohlmann MK, Rath W. Medical prevention and treatment of postpartum hemorrhage: A comparison of different guidelines. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Mar;289:555–67. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3016-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prata N, Bell S, Weidert K. Prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in low-resource settings: Current perspectives. Int J Womens Health. 2013;5:737–52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S51661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Belfort MA. Overview of postpartum hemorrhage. Up-to-date. [Last updated on 2014 Feb 10]. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-postpartum-hemorrhage .
- 16.Westhoff G, Cotter AM, Tolosa JE. Prophylactic oxytocin for the third stage of labour to prevent postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD001808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001808.pub2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Elbourne DR, Prendiville WJ, Carroli G, Wood J, McDonald S. Prophylactic use of oxytocin in the third stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;10:CD001808. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, II, Wenstrom KD. 23rd ed. New York, (NY): McGraw Hill Medical; 2010. Williams Obstetrics; p. 399. [Google Scholar]
- 19.London: NW1 4RGRCOG Press; 2004. National Collaborating Centre for Women's and Children's Health. Caesarean Section. Clinical Guideline. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sheehan SR, Montgomery AA, Carey M, McAuliffe FM, Eogan M, Gleeson R, et al. Oxytocin bolus versus oxytocin bolus and infusion for control of blood loss at elective caesarean section: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. BMJ. 2011;343:d4661. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin: Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists Number 76, October 2006: Postpartum hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108:1039–47. doi: 10.1097/00006250-200610000-00046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.drugs.com/sfx/oxytocin-side-effects.html .
- 23. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/oxytocin-drug-information? source=see_link and utdPopup=true .
- 24. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.medicinenet.com/oxytocin-injectable/article.htm .
- 25. [Last Accessed on 2014 Feb 13]. Available from: http://www.services.medicines.org.uk/assethosting/assets/printable/o/x/oxytocin/printable.1946_529_2198.pdf .
- 26.Butwick A, Harter S. An in vitro investigation of the coagulation effects of exogenous oxytocin using thromboelastography in healthy parturients. Anesth Analg. 2011;113:323–6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182222a82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Saghaei M. Random allocation software for parallel group randomized trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Staikou C, Paraskeva A, Fassoulaki A. The impact of 30 ml/kg hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 vs. hydroxyethyl starch 130/042 on coagulation in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Indian J Med Res. 2012;136:445–50. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]