Abstract
Biological membranes by virtue of their elastic properties should be capable of propagating localized perturbations analogous to sound waves. However, the existence and the possible role of such waves in communication in biology remain unexplored. Here, we report the first observations of two-dimensional solitary elastic pulses in lipid interfaces, excited mechanically and detected by FRET. We demonstrate that the nonlinearity near a maximum in the susceptibility of the lipid monolayer results in solitary pulses that also have a threshold for excitation. These experiments clearly demonstrate that the state of the interface regulates the propagation of pulses both qualitatively and quantitatively. Finally, we elaborate on the striking similarity of the observed phenomenon to nerve pulse propagation and a thermodynamic basis of cell signalling in general.
Keywords: nonlinear acoustics, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, solitary sound waves, action potential, signalling, lipid monolayer
1. Introduction
In a living system, hydration shells around membranes, biomacromolecules (e.g. proteins, DNA, etc.) and ions form quasi-two-dimensional interfacial zones that account for most of the interstitial water. Such an interface can be characterized thermodynamically by its state diagrams [1] that map the interrelationships of physical variables (lateral pressure surface density, surface potential charge, etc.). These state diagrams can be obtained experimentally from macroscopic measurements on the interface. One of us has previously established that the state of the interface is a crucial determinant for equilibrium and non-equilibrium events at the interface [2–4]. For instance, heat capacity or compressibility of the interface [2–4] has been shown to regulate transmembrane current fluctuations or two-dimensional pulse propagation, during which all the variables of interface (pressure, temperature, surface potential, fluorescence, density, charge, etc.) are affected simultaneously as required by Maxwell's relations [3,5,6]. Such events derived from fundamental physical principles may imply certain biological functions (e.g. local membrane transport and communication) and this relationship between state and function can be tested experimentally. For example, sound waves at the membrane interface have been proposed as the physical basis of nerve pulses and it is believed that key features of action potentials (shape stability, all-or-none nature, etc.) result from nonlinear properties of cell membranes [7–11], an idea first put forward by Kaufmann [10]. Theoretically, it is not the complexity of membrane composition, which includes proteins (ion channels and pumps), lipid heterogeneity, etc., but the nonlinearity in the elasticity of the interface that is necessary to support such sound waves. Although such conditions on elasticity are met even in a single or multiple component lipid system, the existence of nonlinear sound waves, also known as solitary elastic waves, which resemble action potentials, has not been demonstrated in a hydrated lipid interface, yet.
This study reports the first observation of ‘solitary’ elastic waves in lipid monolayers. Propagating waves were excited mechanically and the resulting propagating variations in state were detected by fluorescence energy transfer (FRET) measurements. The relationship between the thermodynamic state and velocities of the propagating waves confirmed that they indeed travel within the lipid interface [4]. Most importantly, only when the system was close to the nonlinear regime of the state diagram, sharp localized pulses with large amplitudes were observed. Furthermore, these pulses were excitable only above a critical state-dependent threshold. These self-supporting solitary wave packets propagating in the interface bear striking resemblances to action potentials in living systems.
2. Opto-mechanical experiments on a lipid interface
From an experimental point of view, the ability to control and monitor the state of an interface is crucial for a thermodynamic approach. This is easily achieved in lipid monolayers where the diagrams of state, for instance lateral pressure or surface potential versus area, can be obtained at various bulk pH and temperature conditions [12,13]. We recently showed that the fluorescence intensity of dye molecules embedded in the lipid monolayer is also a thermodynamic observable of the interface [6], meaning that it can be analysed as any other thermodynamic property of the interface (such as surface potential, density, etc.) once the equation of state in terms of fluorescence emission is known. Fluorescence measurements provide a fast and non-contact means for measuring state changes associated with propagating pulses. In this study, we use FRET between a pair of dye molecules, which has two major advantages over standard fluorescence intensity measurements: (i) ratiometric measurements provide significantly better signal-to-noise ratios [14], and (ii) one can distinguish between longitudinal (compressional) and transversal (capillary) components of a pulse [15] (figure 1 and electronic supplementary material, S1 Comment). The experimental set-up shown in figure 1 was used to control and monitor the state of the lipid monolayer at the air/water interface. A chloroform solution, containing lipids dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), the donor N-(7-nitrobenz-2-oxa-1,3-diazol-4-yl)-1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, triethylammonium salt (NBD-PE) and acceptor dye molecules Texas Red 1,2-dihexadecanoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine, triethylammonium salt (Texas Red DHPE) from Invitrogen (100 : 1 : 1) was spread on the water surface of a Langmuir trough. The mean lateral pressure (π) of the monolayer was measured using a Wilhelmy plate. FRET between donor and acceptor dye molecules embedded in the lipid monolayer was measured ratiometrically (20 kS s−1) by the FRET parameter defined as
2.1 |
For this, emission intensities were acquired simultaneously at two wavelengths (535 and 605 nm), while fluorescence was excited at 465 nm and the FRET parameter was characterized as a function of state (π) using the opto-mechanical set-up described in our previous work [6]. For wave experiments, a razor blade attached to a piezo cantilever (American Piezo Company no. 40–2040) was arranged such that the long edge of the blade touches the air–water interface forming a meniscus, while the motion of the cantilever moves the blade horizontally along the interface. The pulses were excited by using controlled mechanical impulses (Δt ∼ 10 ms) of the piezo cantilever (figure 1 and electronic supplementary material, figure S1). The maximum displacement (approx. 1 mm) of the blade represents the upper bound for the amplitude on a relative scale of 0–1A which can be tuned using the power supply (Grass Instruments S88E) for the piezo element. This technique has previously been shown to ensure maximum coupling to the longitudinal mode [16]. The ensuing changes in state were quantified optically via the relative changes in FRET parameter derived from equation (2.1) (figure 1)
2.2 |
In order to understand the state dependence, the pulses were excited at different mean surface pressures.
3. Localized nonlinear pulses controlled by state of the interface
Figure 2 presents the first observations of nonlinear pulses propagating along a lipid monolayer. The pulses were measured optically using equation (2.2) (see also the electronic supplementary material, figure S1) in fundamentally different regimes of the state diagram (marked in figure 2d,e). The regimes differ in terms of their isothermal compressibility κT = −(1/A)(∂A/(∂π)T that can be obtained from the π ↔ A isotherm (inset figure 2e). κT has a sharp peak in the transition region around π = 6 mN m−1 marked as regime (ii), while regime (i) at π = 3.2 mN m−1 and regime (iii) at π = 12.8 mN m−1 represent the two states that lie far on either side of the peak in κT. Comparing the pulse shapes in these three different states reveals at least two striking differences: (i) for the same strength of excitation the amplitude increases by one to two orders of magnitude (approx. 40 times) when excited in the transition regime, and (ii) a significant temporal confinement or steepening of the pulse appears simultaneously (figure 2a–c). The latter can be better appreciated in the frequency domain representation where the temporal confinement inversely results in a significant spectral broadening (Δω ∼ 1/Δt), as will be discussed below. In our recent work, on opto-mechanical coupling [6], it was shown that Δθ/θ ∼ ΔA/A ∼ ΔV/V in the transition region at the interface, where A and V are the surface area and surface potential respectively. Based on this correspondence, the solitary waves excited in the transition regime with a relative FRET amplitude Δθ/θ of 1.2 units are estimated to measure approximately 200 mV in surface potential while sub-threshold pulses measured outside this region will correspond to a surface potential of approximately 5 mV [5]. The pulse shape varies strongly as a function of state near the transition and can be resolved further (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). The pulses remain highly localized and deform gradually while they propagate before eventual decay as discussed later. The exact details of the pulse shape (extent of sharpness and the prominence of long tail below baseline) depend on the boundary conditions (distance from edges of the trough, figure 1) and the choice of piezo cantilever (blocking force, resonance frequency, etc.) to a certain extent.
4. Threshold amplitude and ‘all-or-none’ nature
The sensitive dependence of pulse's shape on state combined with the abrupt increase in its amplitude and confinement indicates that the observed phenomenon is of nonlinear nature. To analyse this nonlinearity further, pulse amplitude Δθ and shape (frequency spectrum) were obtained as a function of excitation strength (peizo amplitude). This experiment presented another remarkable feature of the observed solitary pulses, the presence of a threshold. Only excitations of amplitude above a certain threshold could excite solitary pulses (figure 3). On zooming into the pulse shape, it is observed that near the threshold the increased excitation strength is temporally focused onto certain regions along the pulse shape (electronic supplementary material, figure S4). This results in excitation dependent steepening and confinement of the pulse's shape along with a nonlinear increase in its amplitude. This is better represented by the broadening of the corresponding frequency spectrums (fast Fourier transform; figure 3c). In a linear system, stronger excitations simply cause elevations or rescaling of spectral features to higher amplitudes [18]. However, clear qualitative changes in the spectrum are observed for the pulses presented herein, which underline the impact of nonlinear effects. The higher frequencies (100–300 Hz), present at an excitation of 0.83 A, are practically absent at 0.67 A, where A is an arbitrary scale between 0 and 1 representing the strength of excitation. However, a similar rise in excitation strength from 0.50 to 0.67 A had practically no effect, as represented by near complete overlap of the corresponding spectrums. The onset of higher frequency components near 0.77 A (see also the electronic supplementary material, figure S3) and subsequent strong spectral broadening indicate the existence of a threshold. Although the amplitude-dependent spectral broadening observed here is typical of systems with nonlinear susceptibilities [18,19], the precise control over the degree of nonlinearity is an extraordinary advantage of this set-up.
5. Theoretical considerations
Theoretically, the nonlinearity in the adiabatic compressibility κs of the interface relates to the evolution of a propagating pulse at the interface [4,6]. κs is related to the velocity of propagation cg, which has been measured (cexp) and plotted as a function of mean pressure and mean FRET parameter θ0 (figure 4). The minimum in cexp is related to a maximum in κs (figures 2e and 4) [4,6] confirming the compressional nature of the optically observed pulses. The propagation velocity of a wave packet is represented by the group velocity cg(θ,ω) ≡ ∂ω/∂k which in general is a function of both the amplitude θ and frequency ω, k being the wavenumber. The time delay Δt, measured experimentally, is inversely related to cg and in a dispersive nonlinear system Δt varies within a single pulse Δθ(t), which usually leads to broadening of the pulse shape as it travels. For a pulse of amplitude Δθ and spectral width Δω, the broadening scales as
5.1 |
where β ≡ ∂2κ/∂ω2 is known as the group velocity dispersion parameter [20] and represents the nonlinearity in compressibility. Qualitatively can be estimated from the phenomenological dependence cg(θ)(≈cexp(θ)) (figure 4), where the tangent on any point along the curve would be directly related to c′g. For a preserved pulse shape (ΔΔt → 0) a simple relation, representing the balance between nonlinearity and dispersion, can be derived as . This relationship can be compared with experiments to test whether the observed nonlinear pulses are indeed of solitary nature. In figure 3a, it is reasonable to assume that the values for β and do not change significantly between the two super-threshold pulses. On comparing the spectral half widths (figure 3c) and amplitudes (figure 3a) of these two pulses |Δθ/Δω|0.83 ∼ |Δθ/Δω|1.00 = 0.0045, indicating that the pulse shape is indeed conserved as the nonlinearity and dispersion balance each other. In addition to the solitary nature of the observed pulses, the relation between dispersion and nonlinearity also explains the origin of the threshold. The slope c′g of the phenomenological curve cg(θ) (figure 4) changes sign (negative to positive) on increasing pressure across the minimum in cg(θ). Assuming β does not change its sign, the dispersion and the nonlinearity can only be balanced on one side of the minimum, while on the other side the two effects would rather reinforce each other, smearing out any pulse propagation immediately (note that Δθ is observed to be positive in this region). This is further supported by resolving the state dependence of the pulse shape more sensitively (electronic supplementary material, figure S2). Upon a small increment in π(A) from 5.1 to π(A) = 5.3 mN m−1 the signal shoots up nonlinearly, indicating a strong threshold when approaching the transition from the liquid expanded side. In conclusion, not only the observed pulses are of solitary nature, they also have a clear threshold for excitation due to the second-order nonlinear effects at the minimum in cg near the transition.
Further experiments in different lipid systems are required for a deeper understanding of the observed nonlinearity and threshold. Threshold, dispersion and viscosity, which all depend on state [21,22], affect the evolution of pulse (shape) and hence need to be systematically examined. As discussed for a solitary pulse of given amplitude, the width is conserved despite dispersion when nonlinear effects of the medium counteract sufficiently. However in a dissipating medium, the decay in amplitude will result in a corresponding broadening of the pulse to the point where the nonlinearity cannot balance the dispersion anymore, i.e. that during propagation the amplitude will eventually ‘slip’ below the threshold due to dissipation. This is clearly observed for the solitary pulses reported in this study (electronic supplementary material, figure S5), although at this point the primary reason for decay in amplitude is not clear (we imagine dissipative or geometrical effects as a possible source; figure 1). The role of spatial confinements [23,24] is currently being explored to understand the geometrical effects which according to our preliminary analysis seem to be important for the biphasic nature of the pulse shape.
6. Biological implications
So far, we have tried to emphasize that the solitary pulses with a threshold for excitation result from a peak in compressibility and we have shown this systematically for a lipid monolayer. However, the same line of arguments applies for lipid bilayers and real biological membranes as long as their equation(s) of state give rise to nonlinearities [12,25–28]. The latter is experimentally well established in living cells and single neurons [25,28] and as the measurement of the susceptibilities (cp,κT, etc.) of living systems (single cells) improve, their relevance for many nonlinear phenomena in biology will be better established [29,30]. The obvious differences between mono- and bilayer—although highly important for a detailed analysis—are therefore irrelevant from a fundamental point of view. Nevertheless, a brief discussion on mono- versus bilayer as acoustic mediums may be helpful. The problem of mono- and bilayer correspondence is steeped in rich literature [31–33], but its most important aspect relevant to sound propagation is probably the role of surface tension which is significantly high (γ ∼ 30 ↔ 72 mN m−1) in monolayers at air/water compared with a leaflet in a bilayer where γ → 0. This has direct implications for capillary (transversal) modes which scale with γ and are therefore almost unavoidable in monolayers but are likely to be absent in a bilayer [16,34]. Excitation of longitudinal waves is therefore expected to be more efficient in lipid bilayers. Still, the crucial difference in boundary conditions in the two systems and the role of chemical gradient across the membrane and its integration into a propagating state change need to be further investigated [3].
Finally, based on the general role of nonlinear state diagrams in our study and given the recent discussion on the thermodynamic foundation of nerve pulses, we would like to discuss the biological relevance of our findings. The shape of the solitary pulses in lipid monolayers and action potentials in cell membranes can be directly compared because fluorescence reports membrane potential in both cases [6,35,36]. There are several striking similarities between our results on lipid monolayers and the data on nerve pulses: (i) both systems support ‘all-or-none’ pulses which propagate as solitary waves and exist only in a narrow window bound by certain nonlinearities in their respective state diagrams [28,37,38], (ii) the pulses in both systems represent an adiabatic phenomenon [39,40] and are not only electrical but are also inseparably mechanical (deflection and volume), optical (polarization, chirality, fluorescence, turbidity) and thermal (temperature, enthalpy) pulses [5,6,36,37,39,41–46].
The velocities of the pulses reported herein are in the same order of magnitude as those reported for action potentials in plant cells as well as non-myelinated animal cells [47–49]. Similarly, the biphasic shape (figure 2b) is quite characteristic of action potentials and its similarity to the observed pulses in this study is striking and should be compared with fig. 13 in Hodgkin and Huxley's famous work [17]. Interestingly, the biphasic pulse shape obtained in the monolayer does not require separate proteins and accompanying ion fluxes to explain different phases (rising, falling, undershoot) as in an action potential. Despite these similarities, however, we believe that absolute velocity and pulse shape are not proper criteria for testing a new theory of nerve pulse propagation as both vary tremendously, in cells and as well as in lipid monolayers, depending on composition, excitation and state of the membrane interface [50–52]. Rather, it is the variation in velocity as a function of state cg(π, T), variation in pulse shape as a function of degree of nonlinearity and the existence of a threshold that can be explained thermodynamically [22,53–55], as seen in this study. But before making further such comparisons, the amplitude velocity relation [56,57], the existence of refractory period [58] and the behaviour of two pulses under collision need to be explored for a comprehensive understanding of these nonlinear effects. For example in nonlinear systems, two pulses might change or annihilate in general on collision (like action potentials) or remain unaffected like solitons under special circumstances [7,57,59–62].
Finally, given that the state of the interface has been shown to strongly correlate with the activity of membrane-bound proteins and enzymes [63–65], we are also looking at the effect of these pulses on protein and enzyme kinetics as a new mechanism in biological signalling. Further studies will show whether the solitary elastic pulses as reported here are indeed a physical basis of nerve pulses and cellular communication in general [66,67].
Supplementary Material
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
M.F.S. thanks Dr Konrad Kauffman (Göttingen), who first introduced him to the thermodynamic origin of nerve pulse propagation and its theoretical explanation. We also thank him for numerous seminars and discussions. We thank Dr Christian Fillafer and Dr Josef Griesbauer for helpful discussions.
Funding statement
Financial support by BU-ENG-ME and BU-XTNC is acknowledged. M.F.S. appreciates funds for guest professorship from the German research foundation (DFG), SHENC-research unit FOR 1543.
References
- 1.Gaines GL. 1966. Insoluble monolayers at liquid–gas interfaces, 1st edn New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leirer C, Wunderlich B, Myles VM, Schneider MF. 2009. biophysical chemistry phase transition induced fission in lipid vesicles. Biophys. Chem. 143, 106–109. ( 10.1016/j.bpc.2009.04.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wunderlich B, Leirer C, Idzko A, Keyser UF, Wixforth A, Myles VM, Heimburg T. 2009. Phase-state dependent current fluctuations in pure lipid membranes. Biophys. J. 96, 4592–4597. ( 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.053) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Griesbauer J, Bössinger S, Wixforth A, Schneider MF. 2012. Propagation of 2D pressure pulses in lipid monolayers and its possible implications for biology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 198103 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.198103) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Griesbauer J, Bössinger S, Wixforth A, Schneider M. 2012. Simultaneously propagating voltage and pressure pulses in lipid monolayers of pork brain and synthetic lipids. Phys. Rev. E 86, 061909 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.061909) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shrivastava S, Schneider MF. 2013. Opto-mechanical coupling in interfaces under static and propagative conditions and its biological implications. PLoS ONE 8, e67524 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0067524) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Heimburg T, Jackson AD. 2005. On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 9790–9795. ( 10.1073/pnas.0503823102) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xin-Yi W. 1985. Solitary wave and nonequilibrium phase transition in liquid crystals. Phys. Rev. A 32, 3126–3129. ( 10.1103/PhysRevA.32.3126) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Fergason JL, Brown GH. 1968. Liquid crystals and living systems. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 45, 120–127. ( 10.1007/BF02915335) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kaufmann K. 1989. Action potentials and electrochemical coupling in the macroscopic chiral phospholipid membrane, 1st edn Brasil: Caruaru. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Das P, Schwarz W. 1995. Solitons in cell membranes. Phys. Rev. E 51, 3588–3612. ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.3588) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Albrecht O, Gruler H. 1978. Polymorphism of phospholipid monolayers. J. Phys. 39, 301–324. ( 10.1051/jphys:01978003903030100) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Vogel V, Mobius D. 1988. Local surface potentials and electric dipole moments of lipid monolayers: contributions of the water/lipid and the lipid/air interfaces. Interfaces 126, 408–420. [Google Scholar]
- 14.González JE, Tsien R. 1997. Improved indicators of cell membrane potential that use fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Chem. Biol. 4, 269–277. ( 10.1016/S1074-5521(97)90070-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Budach W, Möbius D. 1989. Detection of longitudinal waves in resonance with capillary waves at the air–water interface by energy transfer. Thin Solid Films 178, 61–65. ( 10.1016/0040-6090(89)90286-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lucassen J. 1967. Longitudinal capillary waves. II. Experiments. Trans. Faraday Soc. 64, 2230–2235. ( 10.1039/tf9686402230) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hodgkin A, Huxley A. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J. Physiol. 117, 500–544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dudley JM, Coen S. 2006. Supercontinuum generation in photonic crystal fiber. Rev. Mod. Phys. 78, 1135–1184. ( 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.1135) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lomonosov A, Hess P, Mayer A. 2002. Observation of solitary elastic surface pulses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 076104 ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.076104) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Agrawal G. 2000. Nonlinear fiber optics, 4th edn. London, UK: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Espinosa G, López-montero I, Monroy F, Langevin D. 2011. Shear rheology of lipid monolayers and insights on membrane fluidity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6008–6013. ( 10.1073/pnas.1018572108) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Graesboll K, Sasse-Middelholf H, Heimburg T. 2014. The thermodynamics of general and local anesthesia. Biophys. J. 106, 2143–2156. ( 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.04.014) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Schweizer J, Loose M, Bonny M, Kruse K, Mönch I, Schwille P. 2012. Geometry sensing by self-organized protein patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15 283–15 288. ( 10.1073/pnas.1206953109) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Krysac L. 1994. first observation of self-focusing of nonlinear second sound in superfluid helium near Tλ. Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2480–2483. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.2480) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Melchior D, Steim J. 1976. Thermotropic transitions in biomembranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 5, 205–238. ( 10.1146/annurev.bb.05.060176.001225) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Overath P, Traeuble H. 1973. Phase transitions in cells, membranes, and lipids of Escherichia coli. Detection by fluorescent probes, light scattering, and dilatometry. Biochemistry 12, 2625–2634. ( 10.1021/bi00738a012) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Träuble H, Eibl H. 1974. Electrostatic effects on lipid phase transitions: membrane structure and ionic environment. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 214–219. ( 10.1073/pnas.71.1.214) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Georgescauld D, Desmazes J, Duclohier H. 1979. Temperature dependence of the fluorescence of pyrene labeled crab nerve membranes. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 27, 147–153. ( 10.1007/BF00215363) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eyzaguirre C, Kuffler S. 1955. Processes of excitation in the dendrites and in soma of single isolated sensory nerve cells of the lobster and crayfish. J. Gen. Physiol. 109, 87–117. ( 10.1085/jgp.39.1.87) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Guharay F, Sachs F. 1984. Stretch-activated single ion channel currents in tissue-cultured embryonic chick skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 352, 685–701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Marsh D. 1996. Lateral pressure in membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1286, 183–223. ( 10.1016/S0304-4157(96)00009-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Feng S. 1999. Interpretation of mechanochemical properties of lipid bilayer vesicles from the equation of state or pressure-area measurement of the monolayer at the air-water or oil–water interface. Langmuir 15, 998–1010. ( 10.1021/la051216n) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jähnig F. 1996. What is the surface tension of a lipid bilayer membrane? Biophys. J. 71, 1348–1349. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(96)79336-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lucassen J. 1968. Longitudinal capillary waves. I. Theory. Trans. Faraday Soc. 64, 2221–2229. ( 10.1039/tf9686402221) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Conti F, Fioravanti R, Malerba F, Wanke E. 1974. A comparative analysis of extrinsic fluorescence in nerve membranes and lipid bilayers. Biophys. Struct. Mech. 1, 27–45. ( 10.1007/BF01022558) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Conti F. 1975. Fluorescent probes in nerve membranes. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 4, 287–310. ( 10.1146/annurev.bb.04.060175.001443) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kobatake Y, Tasaki I, Watanabe A. 1971. Phase transition in membrane with reference to nerve excitation. Adv. Biophys. 2, 1–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ueda T, Muratsugu M, Inoue I, Kobatake Y. 1974. Structural changes of excitable membrane formed on the surface of protoplasmic drops isolated from Nitella. J. Membr. Biol. 18, 177–186. ( 10.1007/BF01870110) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Howarth J, Keynes R. 1975. The heat production associated with the passage of a single impulse in pike olfactory nerve fibres. J. Physiol. 249, 349–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hawton M, Keeler W. 1975. Adiabatic heating and membrane excitation. J. Biol. Phys. 3, 130–141. ( 10.1007/BF02308896) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Heimburg T. 2012. The capacitance and electromechanical coupling of lipid membranes close to transitions: the effect of electrostriction. Biophys. J. 103, 918–929. ( 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.07.010) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Cohen LB, Salzberg BM. 1978. Optical measurement of membrane potential. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 83, 35–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tasaki I. 1995. Mechanical and thermal changes in the Torpedo electric organ associated with its postsynaptic potentials. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 215, 654–658. ( 10.1006/bbrc.1995.2514) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Steppich D, Griesbauer J, Frommelt T, Appelt W, Wixforth A, Schneider M. 2010. Thermomechanic-electrical coupling in phospholipid monolayers near the critical point. Phys. Rev. E 81, 1–5. ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.81.061123) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kim GH, Kosterin P, Obaid AL, Salzberg BM. 2007. A mechanical spike accompanies the action potential in Mammalian nerve terminals. Biophys. J. 92, 3122–3129. ( 10.1529/biophysj.106.103754) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Watanabe A. 1993. Polarity reversal of the optical rotation signals with change in direction of impulse conduction along the lobster nerve. J. Physiol. 466, 55–79. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Johnson BR, Wyttenbach RA, Wayne R, Hoy RR. 2002. Action potentials in a giant algal cell: a comparative approach to mechanisms and evolution of excitability. J. Undergrad. Neurosci. Educ. 1, A23–A27. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Matsumoto G, Tasaki I. 1977. A study of conduction velocity in nonmyelinated nerve fibers. Biophys. J. 20, 1–13. ( 10.1016/S0006-3495(77)85532-X) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Andreassen S, Arendt-Nielsen L. 1987. Muscle fibre conduction velocity in motor units of the human anterior tibial muscle: a new size principle parameter. J. Physiol. 391, 561–571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hill S, Osterhout W. 1938. Nature of the action current in Nitella. IV. Production of quick action currents by exposure to NaCl. J. Gen. Physiol. 22, 91–106. ( 10.1085/jgp.22.1.91) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mueller P. 1958. Prolonged action potentials from single nodes of Ranvier. J. Gen. Physiol. 42, 137–162. ( 10.1085/jgp.42.1.137) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hodgkin A, Katz B. 1949. The effect of temperature on the electrical activity of the giant axon of the squid. J. Physiol. 109, 240–249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rosenthal JJC, Bezanilla F. 2002. A comparison of propagated action potentials from tropical and temperate squid axons: different durations and conduction velocities correlate with ionic conductance levels. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 1819–1830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Inoue I, Kobatake Y, Tasaki I. 1973. Excitability, instability and phase transitions in squid axon membrane under internal perfusion with dilute salt solutions. Biochim. Biophys. Biomembr. 307, 471–477. ( 10.1016/0005-2736(73)90294-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Fillafer C, Schneider MF. 2013. On the temperature behavior of pulse propagation and relaxation in worms, nerves and gels. PLoS ONE 8, e66773.. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0066773) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Hao H-Y, Maris H. 2001. Experiments with acoustic solitons in crystalline solids. Phys. Rev. B 64, 064302 ( 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.064302) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lautrup B, Jackson A, Heimburg T. 2011. The stability of solitons in biomembranes and nerves. Eur. Phys. J. E Soft matter 34, 57–66. ( 10.1140/epje/i2011-11057-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vargas EV, Ludu A, Hustert R, Gumrich P, Jackson AD, Heimburg T. 2011. Periodic solutions and refractory periods in the soliton theory for nerves and the locust femoral nerve. Biophys. Chem. 153, 159–167. ( 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.11.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Eckl C, Mayer A, Kovalev A. 1998. Do surface acoustic solitons exist? Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 983–986. ( 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.983) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Tasaki I. 1949. Collision of two nerve impulses in the nerve fibre. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 3, 494–497. ( 10.1016/0006-3002(49)90121-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lioubashevski O, Fineberg J. 2001. Shock wave criterion for propagating solitary states in driven surface waves. Phys. Rev. E 63, 035302 ( 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.035302) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Gonzalez-Perez A, Budvytyte R. 2014. Penetration of action potentials during collision in the medial giant axon of the earthworm. (http://xxx.tau.ac.il/abs/1404.3643) [Google Scholar]
- 63.Maggio B. 1999. Modulation of phospholipase A2 by electrostatic fields and dipole potential of glycosphingolipids in monolayers. J. Lipid Res. 40, 930–939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gudi S, Nolan JP, Frangos JA. 1998. Modulation of GTPase activity of G proteins by fluid shear stress and phospholipid composition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 2515–2519. ( 10.1073/pnas.95.5.2515) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hønger T, Jørgensen K, Biltonen RL, Mouritsen OG. 1996. Systematic relationship between phospholipase A2 activity and dynamic lipid bilayer microheterogeneity. Biochemistry 35, 9003–9006. ( 10.1021/bi960866a) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Matsuhashi M, et al. 1998. Production of sound waves by bacterial cells and the response of bacterial cells to sound. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 49–55. ( 10.2323/jgam.44.49) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Pelling AE, Sehati S, Gralla EB, Valentine JS, Gimzewski JK. 2004. Local nanomechanical motion of the cell wall of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 305, 1147–1150. ( 10.1126/science.1097640) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.