Abstract
Background
Older individuals with rotator cuff injuries may have difficulties not only with activities of daily living, but also with sports activities.
Questions/purposes
(1) How frequent and severe are rotator cuff abnormalities, as identified by ultrasound, in senior athletes? (2) To what degree does the severity of ultrasound-identified rotator cuff pathology correlate with pain and shoulder dysfunction?
Methods
We assessed pain and shoulder function in 141 elite athletes older than 60 years of age (median age, 70 years; range 60–84) at the Senior Olympics who volunteered to participate. An ultrasound evaluation of the rotator cuff of the dominant shoulder was performed by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist in all of these elite athletes. We then determined the relationship between ultrasound findings and shoulder pain and shoulder function as assessed with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores.
Results
There were 20 shoulders with a normal cuff (14.2% [20 of 141], of which 5% [one of 20] were painful), 23 with tendinosis (16.3% [23 of 141], of which 30% [six of 20] were painful), 68 with a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (48.2% [68 of 141], of which 32% [20 of 63] were painful), and 30 with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (21.3% [30 of 141], of which 25% [seven of 28] were painful). Only 5% of athletes (one of 20) with a normal cuff on ultrasound evaluation reported shoulder pain, whereas 30% of athletes (33 of 111) with any degree of rotator cuff damage on ultrasound evaluation reported shoulder pain, This resulted in an odds ratio of 8.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.0–62.5). The proportion of patients who had pain was not different in those with different severities of rotator cuff pathology. Neither the ASES nor the DASH was different in those with different severities.
Conclusions
The frequency of full-thickness rotator cuff tears in senior athletes was 21.3% (30 of 141). Pain was a predictor of rotator cuff injury but not of its severity. The odds of having shoulder pain was eight times greater in those athletes with any rotator cuff damage as compared with those without any rotator cuff damage. Those with pain had poorer shoulder function but the ASES and DASH were poor predictors of the severity of rotator cuff pathology. Rotator cuff tears in older individuals are often not painful and may not need to be repaired for successful participation in athletics.
Level of Evidence
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Introduction
Rotator cuff injuries are among the most common of musculoskeletal maladies [4, 6, 9, 17]. Classic symptoms of a rotator cuff tear include pain, weakness, and loss of shoulder ROM. When a patient presents to the clinician with these symptoms, the best course of treatment depends on many factors, including (1) patient factors such as age, comorbidities, expectations, employment, workers compensation, activity, strength, tobacco use, and hand dominance; (2) anatomic factors related to the tendon, including the size of the tear, retraction, pattern, etiology (traumatic or atraumatic), chronicity of the tear, and the likelihood of the tear getting worse over time; (3) muscle-related factors such as atrophy and fat accumulation; and lastly (4) glenohumeral joint concerns like the condition of the articular cartilage and position of the humeral head on the glenoid. Difficulty in sorting out these many factors has resulted in little consensus for treatment of rotator cuff tears [20] and substantial geographic variations in surgery rates [30]. Treatment decisions are further complicated by the fact that rotator cuff injury may not even be the reason for the shoulder complaints; cervical spine pathology, acromioclavicular joint abnormalities, arthritis, and adhesive capsulitis all may confuse the clinical picture.
In older patients, rotator cuff tears are known to be common and can be asymptomatic. Both cadaveric and imaging studies have found full-thickness rotator cuff tears in approximately 25% of individuals older than 60 years of age [7, 10, 14, 21, 23, 24, 29]. Most are asymptomatic [23] and remain asymptomatic for several years or longer [12, 32]. As older individuals have become more active, clinicians are increasingly seeing patients with rotator cuff pathology whose difficulties are not limited to restrictions on activities of daily living, but also affect patients’ athletic activities. These include activities of daily living and more strenuous activities such as sports. However, the frequency of asymptomatic rotator cuff pathology in senior athletes is unknown, and the degree to which rotator cuff pathology might be associated with pain or shoulder dysfunction in this population has, to our knowledge, not been described.
Both retrospective [1] and prospective [11] studies have reported nonoperative treatments of symptomatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears to be successful in up to 90% of patients. Although some surgeons offer nonoperative treatments for their older patients with a rotator cuff tear [8], others recommend surgery because of concern that the rotator cuff tear can worsen [12] and shoulder function can deteriorate over time [13]. To determine if seniors can participate in elite sports with rotator cuff injury and to determine the frequency of rotator cuff injuries in senior athletes and the associations with shoulder pain, shoulder function, and severity of injury, we studied participants in the Summer National Senior Games colloquially known as the Senior Olympics. Specifically, we sought to determine: (1) How frequent and severe are rotator cuff abnormalities, as identified by ultrasound, in senior athletes? (2) To what degree does the severity of ultrasound-identified rotator cuff pathology correlate with pain and shoulder dysfunction?
Patients and Methods
After institutional review board approval and permission from the Summer National Senior Games was obtained, we invited athletes at the 2005 Senior Olympics to take part in this research study. To advertise the study, we included an announcement in the athletes’ registration packet, set up a research study information table, and posted flyers in the common area of the Peterson Event Center in Pittsburgh, PA, USA, the central venue of the Senior Olympics. Participation in the study took approximately 60 minutes and included both physical and ultrasound examinations of the shoulder as well as self-assessment questionnaires. Subjects were neither charged for procedures nor reimbursed for study participation.
There were 141 athletes who consented to do so and met the study inclusion criteria. The inclusion criteria were being a participant of the Senior Olympics and being older than 60 years of age and exclusion criteria were there being a history of fracture, osteoarthritis, or shoulder surgery.
We assessed pain with the visual analog scale (VAS) in response to the question “How bad is your pain today?” We also assessed shoulder function with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) health scores. These were administered to the athletes with written instructions and one of us was present to answer questions about these self-assessment questionnaires. Despite this, not all of the athletes completed all portions of the questionnaires. If a portion of the questionnaire was incomplete, it was not included in our analysis. A musculoskeletal radiologist (AP) with 8 years of experience in shoulder sonography performed all ultrasound evaluations (General Electric, Fairfield, CT, USA; Logic 9 with 10 and 12-MHz transducers) on the dominant shoulder and classified the rotator cuff as prior described [2, 22, 31]. Ultrasound has been shown to be effective in the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease [18, 26, 27].
We compared the frequency of tears and severity of pain between those with rotator cuffs classified as (1) normal; (2) tendinosis; (3) partial-thickness tear; or (4) full-thickness tear (Fig. 1). We also compared ASES and DASH scores between the painless and painful shoulders. Researchers who administered the questionnaires were blinded to the ultrasound evaluation and vice versa. The VAS that was scaled from 0 to 100 mm and all responses less than 20 mm were deemed to be painless.
Fig. 1.
This is a transverse image of the supraspinatus with a full-thickness tear communicating with the subacromial, subdeltoid bursa above it. A strand of debris is noted at the tear.
Statistical analysis was performed with t-tests, chi square tests, and Fisher’s exact test as appropriate with 0.05 set as the level of significance.
Results
Age and sex were available on 132 athletes and the average age was 70 years (range 60–84). There were 58 men and 74 women. Ultrasound examinations were performed on 141 shoulders and VAS for pain was completed on 131 athletes. There were 20 shoulders with a normal cuff (14.2% [20 of 141]), of which 5% (one of 20) was painful, 23 with tendinosis (16.3% [23 of 141]), of which 30% (six of 20) were painful, 68 with a partial-thickness tear (48.2% [68 of 141]), of which 32% (20 of 63) were painful, and 30 with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear (21.3% [30 of 141]), of which 25% (seven of 28) were painful (Fig. 2). Five of the full-thickness rotator cuff tears involved more than one tendon. Five percent of athletes (one of 20) with a normal rotator cuff had shoulder pain, whereas 30% of athletes (33 of 111) with any degree of rotator cuff damage reported shoulder pain. This resulted in an odds ratio of 8.0 (95% confidence interval, 1.0–62.5).
Fig. 2.
This shows the number of normal and each type of rotator cuff injury and the percentage of each that is painful.
However, pain was not an indicator of severity of injury because the proportion of patients with pain was similar in those with tendinosis, partial-thickness cuff tears, and full-thickness cuff tears (p > 0.05). ASES and DASH scores were available on 131 athletes. Neither the ASES nor the DASH was different in comparison of those with tendinosis, partial-thickness cuff tears, or full-thickness cuff tears (p > 0.05). In the painless shoulders, the DASH was 4 ± 4 for the normal shoulders, 6 ± 7 for those with tendinosis, 6 ± 6 for those with partial-thickness cuff tears, and 9 ± 9 for those with full-thickness cuff tears. In the painful shoulders, the DASH was 27 for the normal shoulder, 45 ± 16 for those with tendinosis, 39 ± 15 for those with partial-thickness cuff tears, and 49 ± 23 for those with full-thickness cuff tears. In the painless shoulders, the ASES was 96 ± 5 for the normal shoulders, 95 ± 8 for those with tendinosis, 95 ± 7 for those with partial-thickness cuff tears, and 93 ± 9 for those with full-thickness cuff tears. In the painful shoulders, the DASH was 78 for the normal shoulder, 71 ± 14 for those with tendinosis, 68 ± 12 for those with partial-thickness cuff tears, and 57 ± 15 for those with full-thickness cuff tears (Table 1). Painful shoulders had an ASES score of 69 ± 12 and a DASH score of 17 ± 13, worse than those with painless shoulders, ASES of 95 ± 7 and DASH of 6 ± 6, respectively (p < 0.0001 for each).
Table 1.
VAS, DASH, and ASES scores for the normal rotator cuff and each type of injury
Painless | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Type of rotator cuff injury | Number of athletes | VAS ± SD | DASH ± SD | ASES ± SD |
Normal | 19 | 5 ± 7 | 4 ± 4 | 96 ± 5 |
Tendinosis | 14 | 4 ± 56 | 6 ± 7 | 95 ± 8 |
Partial-thickness | 43 | 6 ± 8 | 6 ± 6 | 95 ± 7 |
Full-thickness | 21 | 4 ± 6 | 9 ± 9 | 93 ± 9 |
All | 97 | 5 ± 7 | 6 ± 7 | 95 ± 7 |
Painful | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Normal | 1 | 27 | 10 | 78 |
Tendinosis | 6 | 45 ± 16 | 12 ± 10 | 71 ± 14 |
Partial-thickness | 20 | 39 ± 15 | 19 ± 13 | 68 ± 12 |
Full-thickness | 7 | 49 ± 23 | 24 ± 8 | 57 ± 15 |
All | 34 | 42 ± 17 | 19 ± 13 | 66 ± 14 |
VAS = visual analog scale; DASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand; ASES = American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons.
Discussion
Older individuals have become more active in sports, and so patients presenting for care are doing not merely for limitations on activities of daily living, but with goals that include return to sport. To guide this process, clinicians need information about which kinds of rotator cuff pathology should be treated to maximize the likelihood that senior athletes will be able to remain involved in their chosen sporting pursuits. Because rotator cuff pathology is known to be common in the general population older than 60 years of age, we were interested in studying the frequency of these tears in senior athletes of similar age. We were also interested in whether rotator cuff pathology caused pain and dysfunction in this population.
A limitation of our study is that our volunteers may not have been representative of the athletes participating in the Senior Olympics. A small percentage of the thousands of Senior Olympics athletes participated in our study. There may have been a selection bias in that those with shoulder pain may have been more likely to participate in exchange for the evaluation we provided; this may have led to a higher apparent frequency of injury. Unlike the International Olympics, participants of the US Senior Olympics are often present in the host city only during their events so we strived to be available when the most athletes were in Pittsburgh. However, we were able to evaluate only a few athletes each hour and undoubtedly some athletes who wished to participate could not. Not all of the athletes completed all the information in the self-assessment questionnaires so we reported different numbers of participants in different portions of the study. Finally, we did not evaluate the sensitivity of ultrasound in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears against another modality (such as MRI in this series); however, all evaluations were performed by a musculoskeletal radiologist with 8 years of experience in shoulder sonography, and numerous studies have found ultrasound to be effective in the diagnosis of rotator cuff disease [18, 26, 27].
Rotator cuff tears in older individuals are often not painful and may not need to be repaired for successful participation in athletics. This is true whether the injury is tendinosis, a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear, or a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Although ours is the first study to report the frequency of rotator cuff injuries in athletes, our results are similar to those of others who studied the frequency of rotator cuff injuries in the general population. We found full-thickness rotator cuff tears in 21.3% (30 of 141) of athletes older than 60 years of age. In the general population, full-thickness rotator cuff rears were found in approximately 25% of asymptomatic individuals older than 60 years of age [14, 24, 29]. Minagawa and coworkers [15] found rotator cuff tears increase with age being 15.2% in the 60s, 26.5% in the 70s, and 36.6% in the 80s. We found that 48.2% (68 of 141) of senior athletes older than 60 years of age had partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, which was greater than that found in same-aged individuals in the general population. Studies by both Sher and coworkers and Milgrom and coworkers [14, 24] reported only approximately 25% of asymptomatic individuals older than 60 years of age had a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear. We were somewhat surprised by the severity of rotator cuff pathology we identified in this report; we suspect these athletes had learned to cope with their rotator cuff injury enabling them to succeed throughout the many qualifying rounds of the Senior Olympics.
Most prior studies of the frequency of rotator cuff tears of the general population segregated individuals into asymptomatic [3, 14, 25, 29] and symptomatic groups [5, 19, 28]. In our study, we did not assume subjects were asymptomatic and instead, we assessed pain in each of our subjects with a quantitative measure. Because we did not assume that the participants were asymptomatic, we found that pain was a good predictor of rotator cuff injury in our senior athletes. Only 5% (one of 20) patients with a normal rotator cuff had pain, less frequent than any of those with a rotator cuff injury. Most of the senior athletes with rotator cuff pathology are asymptomatic and other senior athletes with rotator cuff pathology are coping with their pain, yet all are able to participate at an elite level. Our results are not unlike those found in the general population. Yamamoto and coworkers [33] found in 283 shoulders with a rotator cuff tear in 211 residents of a mountain village in Japan who were screened with ultrasound, 65% of them had symptoms with activities of daily living. However, pain was a poor predictor of the severity of rotator cuff injury. This may have been attributable in part to the lack of severe rotator cuff tears in the senior athletes. Of the injuries studied, 136 of the 141 were mild in severity being tendinosis, partial-thickness, or single-tendon, full-thickness rotator cuff tears. If there had been greater numbers of large and massive tears, results may have been different. Like pain, the ASES and DASH scores did not correlate with severity of rotator cuff injury. Others have assessed how often a group of asymptomatic individuals with a rotator cuff tear remained so over time and found a large percentage remained asymptomatic over several years [12, 16, 32]. Specifically, in a study of 195 individuals with full- and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears followed for 2 years, 77% remained asymptomatic [12]. We believe more work needs to be done studying the proportion of patients with symptoms in different populations of individuals.
In conclusion, the frequency of full-thickness rotator cuff tears in senior athletes was 21.3% (30 of 141), which is similar to same-aged individuals of the general population [7, 10, 14, 21, 23, 24, 29]. Partial-thickness tears are more common in senior athletes than the general population [14, 24]. Pain was a good predictor of rotator cuff injury but was a poor predictor of its severity. Athletes with pain had poorer shoulder function, but the ASES and DASH were poor predictors of the severity of rotator cuff injury in senior athletes. A senior athlete presenting to a clinician with shoulder pain may have an etiology other than their rotator cuff tear because tears are not uncommon in these athletes and many of the tears are asymptomatic. Rotator cuff tears in some older individuals do not need to be repaired for successful participation in athletics because some tears are not painful and in those that are, some of the athletes are able to cope with their rotator cuff injuries.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Jason Woollard PT, PhD, of Chatham University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, for assistance with statistical analysis.
Footnotes
Each author certifies that he or she, or a member of his or her immediate family, has no funding or commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request.
Each author certifies that his or her institution approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.
This work was performed at the Summer National Senior Games, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
References
- 1.Ainsworth R, Lewis JS. Exercise therapy for the conservative management of full thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:200–210. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.032524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Arend C, da Silva T. Comparison between exclusively long-axis and multiple-axis sonographic protocols for screening of rotator cuff lesions in symptomatic shoulders. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1725–1732. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.12.1725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chandnani V, Ho C, Gerhartner J, Neumann C, Kursunoglu-Brahme S, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. MR findings in asymptomatic shoulders: a blind analysis using asymptomatic shoulders as controls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;16:25–30. doi: 10.1016/0899-7071(92)90085-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Cofield RH. Rotator cuff disease of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67:974–979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Crass JR, Craig EV, Feinberg SB. Ultrasonography of rotator cuff tears: a review of 500 diagnostic studies. J Clin Ultrasound. 1988;16:313–327. doi: 10.1002/jcu.1870160506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M. Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg. 1986;68:1136–1144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Goodman RS. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;77:10–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Green S, Buchbinder R, Glazier R, Forbes A. Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy. Br Med J. 1998;316:354–360. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7128.354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hattrup SJ. Rotator cuff repair: relevance of patient age. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4:95–100. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80061-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Keyes EL. Observations on rupture of the supraspinatus tendon based upon a study of seventy-three cadavers. Ann Surg. 1933;97:849–856. doi: 10.1097/00000658-193306000-00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kuhn JE, Dunn WR, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, Brophy RH, Carey JL, Holloway B, Jones GL, Ma CB, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Poddar SK, Smith MV, Spencer EE, Vidal AF, Wolf BR, Wright RW, Group MS. Effectiveness of physical therapy in treating atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter prospective cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22:1371–1379. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.01.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mall NA, Kim HM, Keener JD, Steger-May K, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Stobbs G, Yamaguchi K. Symptomatic progression of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a prospective study of clinical and sonographic variables. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:2623–2633. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mather R, 3rd, Koenig L, Acevedo D, Dall T, Gallo P, Romeo A, Tongue J, Williams G., Jr The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;92:1993–2000. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Milgrom C, Schaffler M, Gilbert S, VanHolsbeek M. Rotator-cuff changes in asymptomatic adults: the effect of age, hand dominance and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:296–298. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, Fukuda M, Seki N, Kikuchi K, Kijima H, Itoi E. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: from mass-screening in one village. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013;10:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moosmayer S, Tariq R, Stiris M, Smith H. The natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff tears: a three-year follow-up of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1249–1255. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Morrison DS, Frogameni AD, Woodworth P. Non-operative treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:732–737. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199705000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nazarian L, Jacobson J, Benson C, Bancroft L, Bedi A, McShane J, Miller T, Parker L, Smith J, Steinbach L, Teefey S, Thiele R, Tuite M, Wise J, Yamaguchi K. Imaging algorithms for evaluating suspected rotator cuff disease: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology. 2013;267:589–595. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nelson MC, Leather GP, Nirschl RP, Pettrone FA, Freedman MT. Evaluation of the painful shoulder. A prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, computerized tomographic arthrography, ultrasonography, and operative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:707–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Oh LS, Wolf B, Hall M, Levy B, Marx R. Indications for rotator cuff repair. A systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;455:52–63. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31802fc175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y, Masuhara K, Tamai S. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70:1224–1230. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Petranova T, Vlad V, Porta F, Radunovic G, Micu M, Nestorova R, Iagnocco A. Ultrasound of the shoulder. Med Ultrason. 2012;14:133–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reilly P, Macleod I, Macfarlane R, Emery EJ. Dead men and radiologists don’t lie: a review of cadaveric and radiological studies of rotator cuff tear prevalence. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:116–121. doi: 10.1308/003588406X94968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sher J, Uribe J, Posada A, Murphy B, Zlatkin M. Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of assymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:10–15. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199501000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sher JS, Iannotti JP, Williams GR, Herzog RJ, Kneeland JB, Lisser S, Patel N. The effect of shoulder magnetic resonance imaging on clinical decision making. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7:205–209. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(98)90045-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Smith T, Back T, Toms A, Hing C. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for rotator cuff tears in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2011;66:1036–1048. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Teefey S, Rubin D, Middleton W, Hildebolt C, Leibold R, Yamaguchi K. Detection and quantification of rotator cuff tears. Comparison of ultrasonographic, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopic findings in seventy-one consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:708–716. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:498–504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R. Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:296–299. doi: 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90148-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vitale MG, Krant JJ, Gelijns AC, Heitjan DF, Arons RR, Bigliani LU, Flatow EL. Geographic variations in the rates of operative procedures involving the shoulder, including total shoulder replacement, humeral head replacement, and rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:763–772. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199906000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Yablon C, Bedi A, Morag Y, Jacobson J. Ultrasonography of the shoulder with arthroscopic correlation. Clin Sports Med. 2013;32:391–408. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2013.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yamaguchi K, Tetro M, Blam O, Evanoff BA, Teefey SA, Middleton WD. Natural history of asymptomatic rotator cuff teats: a longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic tears detected sonographically. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:199–203. doi: 10.1067/mse.2001.113086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yamamoto A, Takagishi K, Kobayashi T, Shitara H, Osawa T. Factors involved in the presence of symptoms associated with rotator cuff tears: a comparison of asymptomatic and symptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20:1133–1137. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]