Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Clinical Molecular Pathology logoLink to Clinical Molecular Pathology
. 1996 Apr;49(2):M104–M111. doi: 10.1136/mp.49.2.m104

Principles of ploidy analysis by static cytometry

P S Smith 1, I H Parkinson 1, A S-Y Leong 1
PMCID: PMC408030  PMID: 16696050

Abstract

Aims—To examine the basic assumptions made during DNA ploidy analysis of histological sections with an aim to eliminate methodological errors that have lead to conflicting results with this technique.

Methods—A rat liver imprint and histological sections together with sections and whole nuclei cytospins of human breast tumour biopsy specimens were stained with azure A Schiff's reagent and used to investigate the effects of computer imaging, histological section thickness, nuclear volume, and shape corrections.

Results—The rat liver imprint demonstrated a linear relation between mean nuclear transmittance and nuclear area for each of the three (2C, 4C, 8C) hepatocyte clusters. This finding was used to produce similar, proportional integrated optical density (IOD) measurements from rat liver sections by selecting only nuclei that were sectioned through their centres, as assumed by the mathematics for volume correction. The limitations of computer imaging necessitated an edge (glare) correction for each nucleus so that nuclei of different sizes could be analysed. Shape correction was required to analyse nuclei of different morphologies. Normal human lymphocytes, squamous epithelium and fibroblasts were all measured with similar IODs. DNA ploidy values obtained from 7 μm human breast tumour sections (using lymphocytes as controls) correlated well with those obtained from the whole nuclei cytospins from the same tissue blocks.

Conclusions—With an improved understanding of the theoretical and technical aspects of ploidy analysis of tissue sections, reproducible and consistent results are possible. These results can be integrated into routine histopathology investigations alongside immunohistochemistry and molecular diagnostic techniques.

Keywords: ploidy

Keywords: histological sections

Full text

PDF
M104

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bacus J. W., Bacus J. V. A method of correcting DNA ploidy measurements in tissue sections. Mod Pathol. 1994 Aug;7(6):652–664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bins M., Takens F. A method to estimate the DNA content of whole nuclei from measurements made on thin tissue sections. Cytometry. 1985 May;6(3):234–237. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990060310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carey F. A. Measurement of nuclear DNA content in histological and cytological specimens: principles and applications. J Pathol. 1994 Apr;172(4):307–312. doi: 10.1002/path.1711720404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Danque P. O., Chen H. B., Patil J., Jagirdar J., Orsatti G., Paronetto F. Image analysis versus flow cytometry for DNA ploidy quantitation of solid tumors: a comparison of six methods of sample preparation. Mod Pathol. 1993 May;6(3):270–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dorman A., Graham D., Curran B., Henry K., Leader M. Ploidy of smooth muscle tumours: retrospective image analysis study of formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded tissue. J Clin Pathol. 1990 Jun;43(6):465–468. doi: 10.1136/jcp.43.6.465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Falkmer U. G. Methodologic sources of errors in image and flow cytometric DNA assessments of the malignancy potential of prostatic carcinoma. Hum Pathol. 1992 Apr;23(4):360–367. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90082-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fallenius A. G., Auer G. U., Carstensen J. M. Prognostic significance of DNA measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients. Cancer. 1988 Jul 15;62(2):331–341. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19880715)62:2<331::aid-cncr2820620218>3.0.co;2-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu Y. S., Cheng L., Huang I., Huang S., Wiesmeier E., Wettstein F., Weissman M. DNA ploidy analysis of cervical condyloma and intraepithelial neoplasia in specimens obtained by punch biopsy. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 1989 Jun;11(3):187–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldberg D. M., Diamandis E. P. Models of neoplasia and their diagnostic implications: a historical perspective. Clin Chem. 1993 Nov;39(11 Pt 2):2360–2374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hedley D. W., Clark G. M., Cornelisse C. J., Killander D., Kute T., Merkel D. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA cytometry in carcinoma of the breast. Report of the DNA Cytometry Consensus Conference. Cytometry. 1993;14(5):482–485. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990140505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hedley D. W., Shankey T. V., Wheeless L. L. DNA cytometry consensus conference. Cytometry. 1993;14(5):471–471. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990140502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kiss R., Gasperin P., Verhest A., Pasteels J. L. Modification of tumor ploidy level via the choice of tissue taken as diploid reference in the digital cell image analysis of Feulgen-stained nuclei. Mod Pathol. 1992 Nov;5(6):655–660. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. McCready R. W., Papadimitriou J. M. An analysis of DNA cytophotometry on tissue sections in a rat liver model. Anal Quant Cytol. 1983 Jun;5(2):117–123. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Michie B. A., Black C., Reid R. P., Barrett A., Hamblen D. L. Image analysis derived ploidy and proliferation indices in soft tissue sarcomas: comparison with clinical outcome. J Clin Pathol. 1994 May;47(5):443–447. doi: 10.1136/jcp.47.5.443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Rigaut J. P., Persoz A. The 'corpuscle' stereological problem--re-evaluation using slab fragment volumes and application to the correction of DNA histograms from sections of spherical nuclei. J Microsc. 1989 Dec;156(Pt 3):371–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1989.tb02938.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Shankey T. V., Kallioniemi O. P., Koslowski J. M., Lieber M. L., Mayall B. H., Miller G., Smith G. J. Consensus review of the clinical utility of DNA content cytometry in prostate cancer. Cytometry. 1993;14(5):497–500. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990140508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Shankey T. V., Rabinovitch P. S., Bagwell B., Bauer K. D., Duque R. E., Hedley D. W., Mayall B. H., Wheeless L., Cox C. Guidelines for implementation of clinical DNA cytometry. International Society for Analytical Cytology. Cytometry. 1993;14(5):472–477. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990140503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Molecular Pathology are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES