Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2014 Mar;64(Pt 3):781–786. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.052993-0

Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov. isolated from nodules of Lotus corniculatus

Maximo Sánchez 1, Martha-Helena Ramírez-Bahena 2,3, Alvaro Peix 2,3, María J Lorite 2, Juan Sanjuán 4, Encarna Velázquez 3,5,, Jorge Monza 1
PMCID: PMC4080735  PMID: 24271211

Abstract

Strain S658T was isolated from a Lotus corniculatus nodule in a soil sample obtained in Uruguay. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene and atpD gene showed that this strain clustered within the genus Phyllobacterium. The closest related species was, in both cases, Phyllobacterium trifolii PETP02T with 99.8 % sequence similarity in the 16S rRNA gene and 96.1 % in the atpD gene. The 16S rRNA gene contains an insert at the beginning of the sequence that has no similarities with other inserts present in the same gene in described rhizobial species. Ubiquinone Q-10 was the only quinone detected. Strain S658T differed from its closest relatives through its growth in diverse culture conditions and in the assimilation of several carbon sources. It was not able to reproduce nodules in Lotus corniculatus. The results of DNA–DNA hybridization, phenotypic tests and fatty acid analyses confirmed that this strain should be classified as a representative of a novel species of the genus Phyllobacterium, for which the name Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is S658T( = LMG 27289T = CECT 8230T).


Lotus corniculatus L. (bird’s-foot trefoil) is the most important and widely distributed crop from the Lotus genus (Díaz et al., 2005). Although the species originated in temperate areas of Europe and North Africa, it has spread throughout the world as a result of cultivation (Díaz et al., 2005). Nowadays Lotus corniculatus is the most widely used legume in sown pastures in Uruguay, where it establishes symbiosis with Mesorhizobium (Sotelo et al., 2011).

In the present study, we characterized a novel strain, designated S658T, which was isolated from Lotus corniculatus nodules, and showed that it represents a novel species of the genus Phyllobacterium. At the time of writing, the genus Phyllobacterium, described by Knösel (1962), contains nine species with validly published names (Flores-Félix et al., 2013), Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum, isolated from leaf nodules of Myrsinaceae (Mergaert et al., 2002), Phyllobacterium catacumbae, isolated from a volcanic rock (Jurado et al., 2005), Phyllobacterium trifolii, isolated from Trifolium nodules (Valverde et al., 2005), four species isolated from the rhizoplane of different plants, P. brassicacearum, P. bourgognense, P. leguminum and P. ifriqiyense (Mantelin et al., 2006), and P. endophyticum, a recently described species isolated from nodules of Phaseolus vulgarishttp://dx.doi.org/10.1601/nm.3268 (Flores-Félix et al., 2013).

Strain S658T was isolated from a nodule of Lotus corniculatus in Uruguay during a study of bacteria nodulating this legume. The root nodules were washed several times with sterile distilled water and surface-sterilized for 1 min in 90 % (v/v) ethanol followed by 3 min in 4 % (v/v) NaClO, then washed three times in sterile distilled water, as previously described (Sotelo et al., 2011). The nodules were then crushed using a sterile glass rod and the homogenized nodule tissue was inoculated on modified yeast mannitol agar (YMA; Vincent, 1970) (containing l−1: 10 g mannitol, 1 g yeast extract, 0.2 g K2HPO4, 0.2 g MgSO4 . 7H2O, 0.5 g NaCl, 20 g agar) and incubated at 28 °C for 4 days. The cultures used in further phenotypic and molecular studies were purified from a single colony after incubation for 4 days at 28 °C on YMA. Colonies were white, mucoid, translucent and convex on this medium. Reinfection experiments were performed in Lotus corniculatus, as previously described (Sotelo et al., 2011). Strain S658T was unable to reproduce nodules in Lotus corniculatus and we failed to amplify the nodC gene with the primers described by Laguerre et al. (2001) that allowed the amplification of nodC genes of Mesorhizobium strains from Lotus corniculatus isolated in the same region as our strain (Sotelo et al., 2011).

Strain S658T was grown in nutrient broth (Difco, Becton Dickinson, BBL) for 48 h at 22 °C to check for motility by phase-contrast microscopy using the hanging-drop method. Gram staining was carried out by the procedure described by Doetsch (1981) after 24 h incubation at 28 °C. The flagellation type was determined by electron microscopy after incubation of strain S658T for 48 h in nutrient agar (Difco, Becton Dickinson, BBL) at 22 °C, as previously described (Rivas et al., 2007). Cells of strain S658T were Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, non-sporulating, motile by peritrichous flagella and commonly observed as single cells (Fig. S1, available in the online Supplementary Material).

The 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced as described by Rivas et al. (2007) and the atpD gene using the primers atpD-273F and atpD-771R, as described by Weir et al. (2004). The sequences obtained were compared with those from GenBank using the blastn program (Altschul et al., 1990) and the 16S rRNA gene sequences were also compared with those from the EzTaxon-e server (Kim et al., 2012). Sequences were aligned using clustal x software (Thompson et al., 1997). The distances were calculated according to Kimura’s two-parameter model (Kimura, 1980). Phylogenetic trees of 16S rRNA and atpD genes were inferred using the neighbour-joining model (Saitou & Nei, 1987), and in the case of 16S rRNA gene, the maximum-likelihood model (Rogers and Swofford, 1998) was also used. mega5 software (Tamura et al., 2011) was used for all analyses.

The resulting neighbour-joining tree from 16S rRNA gene analysis is shown in Fig. 1, and the results were congruent with those from maximum-likelihood modelling (data not shown) showing that strain S658T belongs to the genus Phyllobacterium. Comparison of the 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain S658T against those in the EzTaxon-e database showed that its closest relative was P. trifolii PETP02T with 99.79 % sequence similarity without gaps, but strain S658T contains an insert of 85 bp located between nucleotides 70 and 155 of the rrs gene sequence, which is absent in all species of the genus Phyllobacterium described to date.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Neighbour-joining tree based on nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences of Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov. S658T, species of the genus Phyllobacterium and those from the closest genus Mesorhizobium. The significance of each branch is indicated by a percentage bootstrap value calculated for 1000 subsets. Bar, 1 nt substitutions per 100 nt.

Phylogenetic analysis of the atpD (ATPase synthase β subunit) gene (Fig. 2) showed that strain S658T clustered within the Phyllobacterium clade, forming a separate branch within this genus, and related to a group formed by P. brassicacearum LMG 22836T (STM 196T) and P. trifolii PETP02T, with the closest strain, P. trifolii PETP02T, having 96.4 % sequence similarity, which was the same as that found between P. brassicacearum LMG 22836T and P. trifolii PETP02T. This suggested that the novel strain could also belong to a different species of the genus Phyllobacterium.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Neighbour-joining tree based on partial atpD gene sequences of Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov. S658T and related members of the family Phyllobacteriaceae. The significance of each branch is indicated by a percentage bootstrap value calculated for 1000 subsets. Bar, 2 nt substitutions per 100 nt.

DNA–DNA hybridization experiments were carried out in triplicate using the method of Ezaki et al. (1989), following the recommendations of Willems et al. (2001). Strain S658T was hybridized with P. trifolii PETP02T showing 47 % (±8 %) DNA–DNA relatedness. This value is lower than the threshold value of 70 % DNA–DNA relatedness for definition of bacterial species (Wayne et al., 1987), indicating that the strain isolated in this study belongs to a new species of the genus Phyllobacterium.

DNA for analysis of DNA base composition was prepared according to the method of Chun & Goodfellow (1995). The DNA G+C content was determined using the thermal denaturation method (Mandel & Marmur, 1968). The DNA G+C content of strain S658T was 57.8 mol%. This value is within the range of DNA G+C content reported for members of the genus Phyllobacterium (51–58 mol%; Mantelin et al., 2006).

Cellular fatty acids were analysed using the Microbial Identification System (midi; Microbial ID) Sherlock 6.1 and the RTSBA6 library, according to the technical instructions provided (Sasser, 1990). P. trifolii PETP02T was included in this analysis together with strain S658T. The strains were grown on TSA plates (Tryptic Soy Agar, Becton Dickinson; BBL) for 48 h (late-exponential growth phase) at 28 °C. The results of the fatty acid analysis are shown in Table 1. The major fatty acids (>10 %) present in strain S658T were C16 : 0 (20.7 %), C18 : 1ω7c 11-methyl (16.5 %) and C18 : 1ω6c/C18 : 1ω7c in summed feature 8 (48.5 %). Strain S658T differed from the remaining tested strains in the amount of C18 : 1ω7c 11-methyl, which was higher in the novel strain, in the amount of C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c, which was lower, and in the minor presence of C17 : 0. It also differed from its closest relative P. trifolii PETP02T in the amounts of C16 : 0 and C18 : 1ω6c C18 : 1ω7c (in summed feature 8), in the presence of C18 : 1 2-OH and in the absence of C16 : 0 3-OH.

Table 1. Cellular fatty acid composition of strain S658T and type strains of the closest related species of the genus Phyllobacterium.

Strains: 1, S658T; 2, P. trifolii LMG PETP02T; 3, P. endophyticum PEPV15T; 4, P. brassicacearum LMG 22836T; 5, P. bourgognense LMG 22837T. All data are from this study. nd, not detected.

Fatty acid 1 2 3 4 5
Saturated straight-chain
 C13 : 1 at 12-13 nd nd nd nd 1.6
 C14 : 0 0.79 nd 0.71 nd 1.4
 C16 : 0 20.68 12.3 22.6 15.8 22.1
 C17 : 0 0.83 nd nd nd nd
 C18 : 0 2.78 1.8 1.9 1.5 6.4
Hydroxy fatty acids
 C16 : 0 3-OH nd 1.3 1.6 2.3 1.6
 C18 : 1 2-OH 1.03 nd 1.7 nd nd
 C18 : 0 3-OH nd nd 0.6 0.7 nd
Cyclopropane fatty acids
 C17 : 0 cyclo nd nd 2.2 0.4 1.4
 C19 : 0 cyclo ω8c 2.62 6.4 13.9 5.4 10.7
Unsaturated
 C20 : 2ω6,9c nd 0.7 nd 0.4 nd
 C18 : 1ω7c 11-methyl 16.53 10.7 9.2 9.7 9.9
Summed feature*
 2 0.97 1.5 3 3.1 1.4
 3 5.73 2.5 3.6 2.6 4.3
 8 48.05 62.9 39.1 58.3 39.3
*

Summed features represent groups of two or three fatty acids that could not be separated by the Microbial Identification System. Summed feature 2 contained C14 : 13-OH/ C16 : 1 iso 1; summed feature 3 contained C16 : 1ω6c/C16 : 1ω7c; summed feature 8 contained C18 : 1ω6c/C18 : 1ω7c.

Strain S658T was cultivated for 48 h in TSA at 28 °C to obtain the cell mass required for quinone analysis. Quinone analysis was carried out by the Identification Service of the DSMZ (Braunschweig, Germany). Ubiquinone Q-10 was the unique respiratory quinone.

Strain S658T was grown on TY plates (containing l−1: 4 g tryptone, 3 g yeast extract, 0.9 g CaCl2 and 20 g agar) for 24 h for catalase and oxidase production analysis. Catalase production was assayed by using 0.3 % hydrogen peroxide with one colony taken from TY plates. Oxidase activity was detected using N,N,N′,N′-tetramethyl-1,4-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride. The ability to grow at different temperatures (4, 6, 10, 28, 37 and 39 °C) and in the presence of different NaCl concentrations (1, 1.5, 2 and 2.5 %) was determined on the YMA modified medium described above. The ability to grow at different pH (4.5, 5, 6, 7 and 8) was determined in yeast mannitol broth (YMB; containing l−1: 10 g mannitol, 1 g yeast extract, 0.2 g K2HPO4, 0.2 g MgSO4 . 7H2O, 0.5 g NaCl). PCA buffer (0.4 M Na2HPO4 and 0.2 M citric acid) was used to adjust the pH from 4.5 to 6.5 and TE buffer (0.2 M Tris adjusted to pH 8 with HCl plus 1 mM EDTA) was used for pH 8. Other physiological and biochemical tests were carried out using API 20NE and API ID32GN systems (bioMérieux) following the manufacturer’s instructions and the results were read after 72 h and 5 days incubation at 28 °C. To test natural antibiotic resistance the following antibiotics were used: ampicillin (2 µg), erythromycin (2 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), penicillin (10 IU), polymyxin B (300 IU), cloxacillin (1 µg), oxytetracycline (30 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), cefuroxime (30 µg) and neomycin (5 µg), (Becton Dickinson, BBL). The disc diffusion method on YMA medium (Vincent, 1970) incubated at 28 °C was used. The results were read after 48 h incubation; the strain was considered to be sensitive if the inhibition zone was at least 1 cm in diameter. The type strains of species of the genus Phyllobacterium available in the LMG culture collection were included in the phenotypic study as reference strains. Phenotypic characteristics of the novel species are reported in the species description and the differences with respect to other species of the genus Phyllobacterium are recorded in Table 2. Our results were basically in agreement with those of Mantelin et al. (2006) for P. brassicacearum and P. bourgognense, although assimilation of gluconate by the type strains of these species was negative using the API 32GN system and that of l-alanine and maltose were negative for the type strains of P. bourgognense and P. leguminum, respectively. In the case of P. trifolii, the assimilation of sucrose was positive using the API 32GN system whereas it was not detected by Valverde et al. (2005) using the API 50CH system.

Table 2. Phenotypic differences among species of genus Phyllobacterium.

Species: 1, Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov. (strain S658T); 2, P. trifolii (Valverde et al., 2005), 3, P. endophyticum (Flores-Félix et al., 2013); 4, P. brassicacearum (Mantelin et al., 2006); 5, P. bourgognense (Mantelin et al., 2006); 6, P. leguminum (Mantelin et al., 2006); 7, P. ifriqiyense (Mantelin et al., 2006); 8, P. catacumbae (Jurado et al., 2005); 9, P. myrsinacearum (Knösel, 1984; Valverde et al., 2005; Mergaert & Swings, 2005; Mantelin et al., 2006). Data for P. ifriqiyense are from Mantelin et al. (2006) and those from the type strains of the remaining species are coincident with those from the original descriptions of each one and from Flores-Félix et al. (2013) except in the cases marked in this table. +, Positive; −, negative; w, weakly positive; v, variable; nd, no data.

Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Growth at/in:
 37 °C + + + + + +
 pH 5 + + + + w + + +
 2 % NaCl w + + w + + +
Growth on:
 Maltose*† + + + + −‡ + + +
 Gluconate† + −‡ −‡ + + + +
 Sucrose* + + + nd + +
 5-Ketogluconate* w + + + + + + +
d-Malate† + + + + + + + +
 Malonate* w + + w
dl-Lactate* + + + + + + + +
 Valerate* + + + v + +
l-Alanine* w + + −‡ + + +
 4-Hydroxybenzoate* + +
 3-Hydroxybutyrate* + + + + + + + +
 2-Ketogluconate* + w w w nd + +
 Proline* + + + + + + + +
Resistance to:
 Cefuroxime + + + + + nd + +
 Gentamicin + + nd + +
 Polymyxin B + + nd + +
*

Data from API ID32GN.

Data from API 20NE.

Data differ from those of Mantelin et al. (2006).

§

Sucrose assimilation was not detected using API 50CH (Valverde et al., 2005).

In summary, the phylogenetic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic characteristics of strain S658T showed that it represents a novel species of the genus Phyllobacterium, for which the name Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov. is proposed.

Description of Phyllobacterium loti sp. nov.

Phyllobacterium loti (lo′ti. L. n. lotus the African lotus and also a botanical genus name; L. gen. n. loti of lotus, isolated from Lotus corniculatus)

Gram-stain-negative, aerobic rods as for other species of the genus. Colonies are small (<2 mm in diameter) and pearl white on YMA after 48 h incubation at 28 °C. The temperature range for growth is 6–39 °C (optimal growth occurs at 28 °C). The pH range for growth is pH 5–8 (optimal growth occurs at pH 7). Grows in the presence of up to 2 % (w/v) NaCl. The major cellular fatty acids are C16 : 0, C18 : 1ω7c 11-methyl and C18 : 1ω6c/C18 : 1ω7c (summed feature 8). The only quinone detected is Q-10. Catalase and oxidase activities are positive. Nitrate reduction and β-galactosidase activity are negative and aesculin is hydrolysed in the API 20NE system. Arginine dehydrolase, indole, gelatinase and urease are not produced. In the same system glucose, l-arabinose, mannose, mannitol, N-acetylglucosamine, maltose and d-malate are used as carbon sources. Assimilation of gluconate, caprate, adipate, citrate and phenylacetate is negative. In the API ID32GN system the assimilation of N-acetylglucosamine, d-ribose, inositol, sucrose, maltose, d-mannitol, d-glucose, l-fucose, d-sorbitol, l-arabinose, l-histidine and 3-hydroxybutyrate is positive, but assimilation of dl-lactate, l-alanine, itaconate, suberate, malonate, glycogen, 3-hydroxybenzoate, l-serine, salicin, melibiose, propionate, caprate, valerate, citrate, 2-ketogluconate, 4-hydroxybenzoate and l-proline is negative. Assimilation of l-rhamnose, acetate and 5-ketogluconate is weak. Sensitive to ciprofloxacin (5 µg), neomycin (5 µg), polymyxin B (300 IU) and oxytetracycline. Resistant to ampicillin (2 µg), penicillin (10 IU), cefuroxime (30 µg), cloxacillin (1 µg), gentamicin (10 µg) and erythromycin (2 µg).

The type strain is S658T ( = LMG 27289T = CECT 8230T), and was isolated from a nodule of Lotus corniculatus in Uruguay. The DNA G+C content of the type strain is 57.8 mol%.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Programa de Desarrollo de Ciencas Básicas – Uruguay (PEDECIBA) to J. M. and MICINN to E. V., and M.-H. R.-B. was supported by a postdoctoral JAE-Doc (CSIC) contract. We thank Professor J. Euzéby for his valuable help in providing the correct etymology for the name of the new taxon.

Footnotes

A supplementary figure is available with the online version of this paper.

References

  1. Altschul S. F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E. W., Lipman D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215, 403–410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chun J., Goodfellow M. (1995). A phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardia with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 240–245 10.1099/00207713-45-2-240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Díaz P., Borsani O., Monza J. (2005). Lotus-related species and their agronomic importance. In Lotus japonicus Handbook. pp. 25–37 Edited by Márquez A. J., Stougaard J., Udvardi M., Parniske M., Spaink H., Saalbach G., Webb J., Chiurazzi M. Dordrecht: Springer; 10.1007/1-4020-3735-X_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Doetsch R. N. (1981). Determinative methods of light microscopy. In Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology, pp. 21–33 Edited by Gerdhardt P., Murray R. G. E., Costilow R. N., Nester E. W., Wood W. A., Krieg N. R., Phillips G. B. Washington: American Society for Microbiology [Google Scholar]
  5. Ezaki T., Hashimoto Y., Yabuuchi E. (1989). Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 224–229 10.1099/00207713-39-3-224 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Flores-Félix J. D., Carro L., Velázquez E., Valverde A., Cerda-Castillo E., García-Fraile P., Rivas R. (2013). Phyllobacterium endophyticum sp. nov., isolated from nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63, 821–826 10.1099/ijs.0.038497-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jurado V., Laíz L., González J. M., Hernández-Marine M., Valens M., Saiz-Jimenez C. (2005). Phyllobacterium catacumbae sp. nov., a member of the order ‘Rhizobiales’ isolated from Roman catacombs. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 1487–1490 10.1099/ijs.0.63402-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kim O. S., Cho Y. J., Lee K., Yoon S. H., Kim M., Na H., Park S. C., Jeon Y. S., Lee J. H. & other authors (2012). Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62, 716–721 10.1099/ijs.0.038075-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M. (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16, 111–120 10.1007/BF01731581 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Knösel D. H. (1962). Prufung von Bakterien auf Fahigkeit zur Sternbildung. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasirtenkd Infektionskr Hyg II Abt 116, 79–100 [Google Scholar]
  11. Knösel D. H. (1984). Genus IV. Phyllobacterium (ex Knösel 1962) nom. rev. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 254–256 Edited by Krieg N. R., Holt J. G. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins [Google Scholar]
  12. Laguerre G., Nour S. M., Macheret V., Sanjuan J., Drouin P., Amarger N. (2001). Classification of rhizobia based on nodC and nifH gene analysis reveals a close phylogenetic relationship among Phaseolus vulgaris symbionts. Microbiology 147, 981–993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mandel M., Marmur J. (1968). Use of ultraviolet absorbance temperature profile for determining the guanine plus cytosine content of DNA. Methods Enzymol 12B, 195–206 10.1016/0076-6879(67)12133-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mantelin S., Saux M. F., Zakhia F., Béna G., Bonneau S., Jeder H., de Lajudie P., Cleyet-Marel J. C. (2006). Emended description of the genus Phyllobacterium and description of four novel species associated with plant roots: Phyllobacterium bourgognense sp. nov., Phyllobacterium ifriqiyense sp. nov., Phyllobacterium leguminum sp. nov. and Phyllobacterium brassicacearum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 827–839 10.1099/ijs.0.63911-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mergaert J., Swings J. (2005). Genus I. Phyllobacterium. In The Alpha-, Beta-, Delta- and Epsilonproteobacteria, The Proteobacteria, Part C, Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn, vol. 2, pp. 394–396 Edited by Brenner D. J., Krieg N. R., Staley J. T., Garrity G. M. New York: Springer; 10.1007/0-387-29298-5_93 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mergaert J., Cnockaert M. C., Swings J. (2002). Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum (subjective synonym Phyllobacterium rubiacearum) emend. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1821–1823 10.1099/ijs.0.02150-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rivas R., García-Fraile P., Mateos P. F., Martínez-Molina E., Velázquez E. (2007). Characterization of xylanolytic bacteria present in the bract phyllosphere of the date palm Phoenix dactylifera . Lett Appl Microbiol 44, 181–187 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02050.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Rogers J. S., Swofford D. L. (1998). A fast method for approximating maximum likelihoods of phylogenetic trees from nucleotide sequences. Syst Biol 47, 77–89 10.1080/106351598261049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Saitou N., Nei M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sasser M. (1990). Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc [Google Scholar]
  21. Sotelo M., Irisarri P., Lorite M. J., Casaretto E., Rebuffo M., Sanjuán J., Monza J. (2011). Diversity of rhizobia nodulating Lotus corniculatus grown in northern and southern regions of Uruguay. Appl Soil Ecol 49, 197–207 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. (2011). mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28, 2731–2739 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thompson J. D., Gibson T. J., Plewniak F., Jeanmougin F., Higgins D. G. (1997). The clustal_x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 4876–4882 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Valverde A., Velázquez E., Fernández-Santos F., Vizcaíno N., Rivas R., Mateos P. F., Martínez-Molina E., Igual J. M., Willems A. (2005). Phyllobacterium trifolii sp. nov., nodulating Trifolium and Lupinus in Spanish soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 1985–1989 10.1099/ijs.0.63551-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vincent J. M. (1970). The cultivation, isolation and maintenance of rhizobia. In A Manual for the Practical Study of Root-Nodule, pp. 1–13 Edited by Vincent J. M. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications [Google Scholar]
  26. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., Grimont P. A. D., Kandler O., Krichevsky M. I., Moore L. H., Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E. & other authors (1987). International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 463–464 10.1099/00207713-37-4-463 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Weir B. S., Turner S. J., Silvester W. B., Park D. C., Young J. M. (2004). Unexpectedly diverse Mesorhizobium strains and Rhizobium leguminosarum nodulate native legume genera of New Zealand, while introduced legume weeds are nodulated by Bradyrhizobium species. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 5980–5987 10.1128/AEM.70.10.5980-5987.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Willems A., Doignon-Bourcier F., Goris J., Coopman R., de Lajudie P., De Vos P., Gillis M. (2001). DNA–DNA hybridization study of Bradyrhizobium strains. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1315–1322 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES