Abstract
Oenococcus oeni OM27 is a strain selected from “Nero di Troia” wine undergoing spontaneous malolactic fermentation. “Nero di Troia” is a wine made from “Uva di Troia” grapes, an autochthonous black grape variety from the Apulian region (south of Italy). In this paper we present a 1.78-Mb assembly of the O. oeni OM27 genome, the first fully assembled genome of an O. oeni strain from an Italian wine.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Oenococcus oeni OM17 is a strain isolated from “Nero di Troia” wine undergoing spontaneous malolactic fermentation (MLF) (1). “Nero di Troia” is a typical Apulian (Italy) red wine obtained from “Uva di Troia,” an autochthonous black grape variety. O. oeni is the main lactic acid bacterium species involved in the microbial decarboxylation of L-malic acid into L-lactic acid and CO2 that usually takes place in wine after the alcoholic fermentation of grape must. This bio-conversion improves the organoleptic properties of wine (2–4). The only O. oeni complete genome sequence available is for O. oeni PSU-1 (5), while the assembled genome sequences of 13 O. oeni strains were recently deposited in the GenBank database (6). For O. oeni strain ATCC BAA-1163, a proteome reference map is also available (7). Recently, the role of cultivar, vintage, and climate in the microbial biogeography of wine grapes has been clarified, corroborating the existence of a “microbial terroir” for wine grapes (8, 9), an important concept for fermented food and beverages with a geographical indication status (10–13). O. oeni OM27 is a good candidate to design autochthonous starter cultures to perform MLF in wine obtained from “Uva di Troia” grapes. The assembled complete genome represents an important tool to investigate the strain safety (14–16), the tolerance to the hostile condition of wine (17, 18), and the molecular basis of the positive contribution to the final product (3, 4, 13, 19). To the best of our knowledge, O. oeni OM27 is the first published fully assembled genome of an O. oeni strain from an Italian wine.
2 µg of genomic DNA was subjected to library preparation using the TruSeq DNA sample prep kit FC-121-1001 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Whole-genome sequencing of O. oeni OM27 was performed using the Illumina GAIIx platform. Prior to assembly, raw reads were filtered using PRINSEQ v0.20.3 software (20). This filtering step was performed in order to remove the 3′ ends showing a quality score below 25 (Q<25), the reads containing a percentage of uncalled based (“N” characters) equal or greater than 10% and the duplicated sequences. After filtering, a total of 20,403,000 paired end reads of 115-bp length were obtained corresponding to a coverage of about 1,300× (the O. oeni OM27 size is about 1.78 Mb). Genome sequences were de novo assembled using the Ray v2.2.0 assembly program (21) with default parameters and using a k-mer size of 71. The assembly resulted in 20 contigs with an N50 length of 184,677 bp. The size of the shortest contig was 1,255 bp while the length of the longest contig was 550,977 bp. The sequence was annotated by the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Prokaryotic Genomes Annotation Pipeline.
The genome is 1,786,146 bp long with a G+C content of 37.9%. The genome size and the G+C content are comparable to those of the other published O. oeni strains (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/genomes/541). Out of 1,810 predicted genes, 1,682 were protein coding genes, 80 were annotated as pseudo-genes, while 48 were RNA coding genes (42 tRNAs and 6 rRNAs).
Nucleotide sequence accession number.
The whole-genome shotgun project of O. oeni OM27 has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession no. JMIS00000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was partially supported by a grant from the project PON02_00186_3417512, “S.I.Mi.S.A.,” and by the Apulian Region in the framework of the “OenoMicroManagement” project (PIF no. 94750304571).
Footnotes
Citation Lamontanara A, Orrù L, Cattivelli L, Russo P, Spano G, Capozzi V. 2014. Genome sequence of Oenococcus oeni OM27, the first fully assembled genome of a strain isolated from an Italian wine. Genome Announc. 2(4):e00658-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00658-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Capozzi V, Russo P, Beneduce L, Weidmann S, Grieco F, Guzzo J, Spano G. 2010. Technological properties of Oenococcus oeni strains isolated from typical southern Italian wines. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 50:327–334. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02795.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lonvaud-Funel A. 1999. Lactic acid bacteria in the quality improvement and depreciation of wine. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 76:317–331. 10.1023/A:1002088931106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Bartowsky E. 2005. Oenococcus oeni and malolactic fermentation-moving into the molecular arena. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 11:174–187. 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00286.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Bartowsky EJ, Borneman AR. 2011. Genomic variations of Oenococcus oeni strains and the potential to impact on malolactic fermentation and aroma compounds in wine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 92:441–447. 10.1007/s00253-011-3546-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mills DA, Rawsthorne H, Parker C, Tamir D, Makarova K. 2005. Genomic analysis of Oenococcus oeni PSU-1 and its relevance to winemaking. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29:465–475. 10.1016/j.fmrre.2005.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Borneman AR, McCarthy JM, Chambers PJ, Bartowsky EJ. 2012. Comparative analysis of the Oenococcus oeni pan genome reveals genetic diversity in industrially-relevant pathways. BMC Genomics 13:373. 10.1186/1471-2164-13-373 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. de la Luz Mohedano M, Russo P, de los Rios V, Capozzi V, Spano G, López P. 2014. A proteome reference map of the wine lactic acid bacteria Oenococcus oeni ATCC BAA-1163. Open Biol. 4:1–10. 10.1098/rsob.130154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Bokulich NA, Thorngate JH, Richardson PM, Mills DA. 2014. Microbial biogeography of wine grapes is conditioned by cultivar, vintage, and climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111:E139–E148. 10.1073/pnas.1317377110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Gilbert JA, van der Lelie D, Zarraonaindia I. 2014. Microbial terroir for wine grapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111:5–6. 10.1073/pnas.1321606111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Capozzi V, Spano G. 2011. Food microbial biodiversity and “microbes of protected origin”. Front. Microbiol. 2:237. 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00237 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Capozzi V, Spano G, Fiocco D. 2012. Transdisciplinarity and Microbiology Education. J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ. 13:70–73 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Capozzi V, Russo P, Spano G. 2012. Microbial information regimen in EU Geographical Indications. World Pat. Inf. 34:229–231. 10.1016/j.wpi.2012.04.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Malherbe S, Menichelli E, du Toit M, Tredoux A, Muller N, Naes T, Nieuwoudt H. 2013. The relationships between consumer liking, sensory and chemical attributes of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Pinotage wines elaborated with different Oenococcus oeni starter cultures. J. Sci. Food Agric. 93:2829–2840. 10.1002/jsfa.6115 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Spano G, Russo P, Lonvaud-Funel A, Lucas P, Alexandre H, Grandvalet C, Coton E, Coton M, Barnavon L, Bach B, Rattray F, Bunte A, Magni C, Ladero V, Alvarez M, Fernández M, Lopez P, de Palencia PF, Corbi A, Trip H, Lolkema JS. 2010. Biogenic amines in fermented foods. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 64:95–100. 10.1038/ejcn.2010.218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Capozzi V, Ladero V, Beneduce L, Fernández M, Alvarez MA, Benoit B, Laurent B, Grieco F, Spano G. 2011. Isolation and characterization of tyramine-producing Enterococcus faecium strains from red wine. Food Microbiol. 28:434–439. 10.1016/j.fm.2010.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Garcia-Moruno E, Muñoz R. 2012. Does Oenococcus oeni produce histamine? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 157:121–129. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Spano G, Massa S. 2006. Environmental stress response in wine lactic acid bacteria: beyond Bacillus subtilis. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 32:77–86. 10.1080/10408410600709800 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Capozzi V, Russo P, Ladero V, Fernández M, Fiocco D, Alvarez MA, Grieco F, Spano G. 2012. Biogenic amines degradation by Lactobacillus plantarum: toward a potential application in wine. Front. Microbiol. 3:122. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lerm E, Engelbrecht L, du Toit M. 2010. Malolactic fermentation: the ABC’s of MLF. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 31:186–212 [Google Scholar]
- 20. Schmieder R, Edwards R. 2011. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Boisvert S, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. 2010. Ray: simultaneous assembly of reads from a mix of high-throughput sequencing technologies. J. Comput. Biol. 17:1519–1533. 10.1089/cmb.2009.0238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]