Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 4.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 9;172(7):548–554. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2238

Evaluating influenza vaccine effectiveness among hemodialysis patients using a natural experiment

Leah J McGrath 1, Abhijit V Kshirsagar 1, Stephen R Cole 1, Lily Wang 1, David J Weber 1, Til Stürmer 1, M Alan Brookhart 1
PMCID: PMC4082376  NIHMSID: NIHMS579722  PMID: 22493462

Abstract

Background

Although the influenza vaccine is recommended for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, little is known about its effectiveness. Observational studies of vaccine effectiveness (VE) are challenging because vaccinated persons may be healthier than unvaccinated persons.

Methods

Using United States Renal Data System data, we estimated VE for influenza-like illness (ILI), influenza/pneumonia hospitalization, and mortality in adult, hemodialysis patients using a natural experiment created by year-to-year variation in the match of the influenza vaccine to the circulating virus. Matched (1998, 1999, 2001) and unmatched (1997) years among vaccinated patients were compared using Cox proportional hazards models. Ratios of hazard ratios compared vaccinated patients between two years and unvaccinated patients between two years. VE was calculated as 1 - effect measure.

Results

Vaccination rates were <50% each year. Conventional analysis comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated patients produced average VE estimates of 13%, 16%, and 30% for ILI, influenza/pneumonia hospitalization and mortality respectively. When restricted to the pre-influenza period, results were even stronger, indicating bias. The pooled ratio of HRs comparing matched seasons to a placebo season resulted in a VE of 0% (95% CI: −3,2%) for ILI, 2% (95% CI: −2,5%) for hospitalization, and 0% (95% CI: −3,3%) for death.

Conclusions

Relative to a mismatched year, we found little evidence of increased VE in subsequent, well-matched years, suggesting that the current influenza vaccine strategy may have a smaller effect on morbidity and mortality in the ESRD population than previously thought. Alternate strategies (high dose vaccine, adjuvanted vaccine, multiple doses) should be investigated.

Keywords: Influenza vaccines, vaccine effectiveness, bias (epidemiology), renal dialysis, cohort studies

Introduction

Influenza causes substantial morbidity and mortality in the general population with approximately 39,000 people dying each year.1 Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may be at higher risk of illness and death from influenza relative to healthy adults. Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine has been recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for over 40 years.2 Administration of seasonal influenza vaccination has become routine practice at most dialysis clinics over the past two decades. Although hemodialysis patients have lower response rates to influenza vaccine compared with healthy adults, immunogenicity studies show that 50–93% of dialysis patients develop antibody titers after vaccination.3,4 However, it is currently unclear how much morbidity and mortality is prevented by the influenza vaccine in ESRD patients.5 To date, there has been one study among hemodialysis patients that estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) for influenza/pneumonia hospitalizations to be 12–14% and 25% for all-cause mortality.6 Recent studies in the non-dialysis, elderly population have suggested that large VE effects (up to 50% reduction of all-cause mortality in some studies 79) obtained from standard epidemiologic studies may be due to confounding by unmeasured prognostic variables, and the true effect may be small to negligible.1014

One potential way to avoid confounding by patient-level differences is to exploit the natural experiment that is caused by strong year-to-year variation in the match of the vaccine to the circulating strain. The influenza virus that predominates in a season can undergo antigenic drift after the vaccine strain has been chosen, resulting in a vaccine that provides reduced immunity. In seasons with a well-matched vaccine, vaccination is expected to be effective in preventing influenza related outcomes, whereas in mismatched seasons, vaccination is expected to have a minimal effect. It has been documented that the 1997–98 influenza vaccine strain (A/Wuhan/359/95) did not match the circulating strain (A/Sydney/5/97) 15 and outbreak investigations suggested that the vaccine provided limited protection.16 A randomized controlled trial confirmed that the vaccine did not prevent clinically relevant outcomes during this season among healthy adults younger than 65 years: vaccinated patients had more influenza-like illnesses and upper respiratory tract infections than placebo patients.17 In three of the following four years, the same strain of virus circulated in the community and the vaccine was well matched.1820

We evaluated the difference in VE between years where the vaccine was well matched and the 1997–98 “placebo” year, where the vaccine was poorly matched and was shown to have provided little benefit. By studying this natural experiment, we sought to reduce confounding bias due to frailty and unmeasured health behaviors to obtain a more accurate measure of VE.

Methods

Study Population

We used Medicare claims from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The USRDS is a population-based, national system that collects information on all patients with ESRD in the US. Claims include information on physician services, International Classification of Diseases, 9th rev., Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes assigned to hospitalizations and outpatient care, information on dialysis care, medication and immunization use. These are captured for all patients with Medicare as a primary payer status (no HMO, or Medicare as a secondary payer).

Our cohorts consisted of all adult, ESRD patients with Medicare as a primary payer and continuous hemodialysis use. Each yearly cohort consisted of patients who had initiated dialysis prior to October 1 of the preceding year. An eight month window from January 1 – August 31 of each year was used to identify insurance and dialysis status and comorbidities for the patients in that cohort. For example, the cohort identified for the 1997–98 season would have initiated dialysis prior to October 1, 1996 and would have been on continuous hemodialysis and Medicare as a primary payer between January 1 – August 31, 1997. Vaccination and outcome status was assessed beginning on September 1 of each year. Cohort members were followed each year until they experienced the outcome, death, transplant, loss-to-follow up or administrative censoring on August 31 of the following year (e.g. August 31, 1998 for the 1997 influenza season).

Influenza Seasons

We chose to analyze specific years based on the characteristics of each influenza season – years with similar influenza severity and close temporally to the mismatched season. We used years before it was common to pay out of pocket at grocery stores or pharmacies to limit exposure misclassification. Cohorts were created for the following influenza seasons: 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001. Seasons were defined by the year in which vaccination began for that influenza season (the 1997–1998 season was defined as 1997). These four seasons were used due to their similar severity and strain of influenza, but various levels of vaccine match (i.e. how well the vaccine matched the strain circulating in the community).15,1820 We excluded the 2000 season to limit differences between seasons due to influenza severity; the predominate strain in the community in 2000 was a less severe strain (A/H1N1).21 We estimated the start of each influenza season by using national influenza surveillance data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We defined the start of the season as the midpoint of the first week where more than 10% of the isolates were positive for influenza. A sensitivity analysis examined the effect of a less restrictive definition, with the start of the season defined as the week with 5% of isolates positive for influenza.

Vaccination Status

Medicare Part A hospital/outpatient files and Part B physician/supplier files were searched for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 90724, 90656, 90658-60, and HCFA Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes G0008 and G8482. Because our study population is often hospitalized, we also searched for ICD-9 procedure code 99.52.

Outcomes

We examined three outcomes: all-cause mortality, influenza/pneumonia hospitalization and influenza-like illness (ILI). Mortality is identified by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 2746, the ESRD Death Notification Form. We searched the principle discharge diagnoses in the Medicare Part A inpatient hospitalization files for the first instance of ICD-9-CM codes 480.xx – 487.xx to identify influenza/pneumonia hospitalizations. Inpatient and outpatient codes were searched to identify the first instance of ILI as in Lindsay, et al (Appendix 1).22 In a sensitivity analysis, we limited ILI to more specific codes by removing ICD-9 codes 465, 466, and 490.

Covariates

All confounders were identified using the existing evidence base – including the investigative team’s knowledge and the published literature. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services form 2827, the Medical Evidence Form, was used to ascertain age, race, gender, first service date with ESRD, and cause of kidney failure. Part A and B claims were searched during the eight month window from January 1 to August 31 for oxygen use and comorbidities as identified in Liu et al.23: atherosclerotic heart disease, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular accident/transient ischemic attack, peripheral vascular disease, other cardiac, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, liver disease, dysrhythmia, cancer, and diabetes. Comorbidities were modeled as dichotomous variables in the final models. Adherence to dialysis was calculated by summing the number of dialysis sessions over the eight month baseline period: patients were considered adherent if they had 95 sessions or more. Patients with no dialysis sessions over the baseline period were dropped from the analysis. We also included the number of hospital days over the baseline period. Use of mobility aids were ascertained by searching Part A and Part B claims for HCPCS equipment codes for wheelchairs, walkers, canes, and assisted bathroom equipment during the baseline period (Appendix 1).

Statistical Analysis

We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated within each year.24 Vaccination was modeled as a time-varying covariate, with all cohort members entering the analysis in September 1 as unvaccinated. Once vaccinated, patients remained in the vaccinated category until the end of that influenza year (August 31). To quantify bias in these estimates, we ran the same models during the pre-influenza period (September 1 through the day before the influenza season started). When limited to the period prior to the start of influenza season when vaccine effectiveness should be biologically negligible, we would expect the HR estimate to be close to 1.0 if no confounding were present. This method identifies if conventional analyses remain biased even after adjustment.

To estimate effects between seasons, we ran proportional hazards models with an interaction between vaccination status and year, with vaccination status treated as above. Kaplan-Meier survival curves are reported for the comparison of different years among vaccinated patients. We report the antilog of the beta coefficient for the interaction term, which represents the ratio of two hazard ratios: comparing the vaccinated in a matched year to the vaccinated in the unmatched year divided by the comparison of the unvaccinated in a match year to the unvaccinated in the unmatched year. Because patients could be in multiple cohorts, robust variance was initially used to account for the possibility of having multiple events in the analysis of non-death events. Using robust variance did not change the variance estimate, thus we report standard variances.

Adjusted models in all analyses controlled for age, race, sex, cause of ESRD, length of time with ESRD (vintage), adherence to dialysis, number of mobility aids as a proxy for functional status, oxygen use, hospital days, ESRD network and comorbidities. The proportional hazard assumption was checked graphically. To examine the effect of non-proportional hazards, we limited our final model to run only through the end of the influenza season, which is approximately the time when the curves crossed. Analyses were conducted using SAS 9.2 (Cary, NC) using Efron’s method for tied event times.25 This study was considered exempt from human subjects review by the institutional review board at the University of North Carolina.

Results

There were more than 100,000 patients who met the inclusion criteria in each influenza season cohort and vaccination rates were approximately 47% each year, which were similar to previously reported estimates (Table 1).6,26 Patients who received the influenza vaccine were older, had fewer years with ESRD, were more likely to be white and had better adherence to dialysis. These differences persisted over the study time period. Additionally, the mean age of the vaccinated cohorts increased, and the proportion with diabetes as the cause of ESRD increased over the study time period.

Table 1.

Description of study cohorts

Variable 1997 1998 1999 2001
Vaccinated
N=52,287
N (%)
Unvaccinated
N=55,178
N (%)
Vaccinated
N=53,884
N (%)
Unvaccinated
N=59,225
N (%)
Vaccinated
N=56,796
N (%)
Unvaccinated
N=60,248
N (%)
Vaccinated
N=61,800
N (%)
Unvaccinated
N=64,899
N (%)
Mean age at Sept. 1 (SD) 62.3 (14.2) 60.3 (15.0) 62.7 (14.1) 60.6 (15.0) 63.1 (14.2) 61.0 (14.9) 63.9 (14.0) 61.7 (14.8)
Male sex 27,310 (52.2) 27,827 (50.4) 28,363 (52.6) 30,213 (51.0) 29,963 (52.8) 30,621 (50.8) 32,727 (53.0) 33,476 (51.6)
Race
  White 29,625 (56.7) 25,975 (47.1) 30,744 (57.1) 27,857 (47.0) 32,100 (56.5) 28,606 (47.5) 35,571 (57.6) 31,631 (48.7)
  Black 20,443 (39.1) 26,384 (47.8) 20,659 (38.3) 28,271 (47.7) 21,978 (38.7) 28,428 (47.2) 23,150 (37.5) 29,629 (45.7)
  Other 2,219 (4.2) 2,819 (5.1) 2,481 (4.6) 3,097 (5.2) 2,718 (4.8) 3,214 (5.3) 3,079 (5.0) 3,639 (5.6)
Cause of ESRD
  Diabetes 19,988 (38.2) 20,277 (36.8) 21,453 (39.8) 22,550 (38.1) 23,336 (41.1) 23,614 (39.2) 26,457 (42.8) 27,044 (41.7)
  Hypertension 16,503 (31.6) 18,055 (32.7) 16,650 (30.9) 18,947 (32.0) 17,207 (30.3) 18,988 (31.5) 18,365 (29.7) 19,923 (30.7)
  Glomerulonephritis 6,998 (13.4) 7,595 (13.8) 6,931 (12.9) 8,002 (13.5) 7,114 (12.5) 7,842 (13.0) 7,300 (11.8) 7,784 (12.0)
  Cystic Kidney 1,838 (3.5) 1,677 (3.0) 1,781 (3.3) 1,705 (2.9) 1,772 (3.1) 1,649 (2.7) 1,739 (2.8) 1,643 (2.5)
  Other 6,960 (13.3) 7,574 (13.7) 7,069 (13.1) 8,021 (13.5) 7,367 (13.0) 8,155 (13.5) 7,939 (12.9) 8,505 (13.1)
1 or more mobility aid 4,096 (7.8) 4,767 (8.6) 3,840 (7.1) 4,563 (7.7) 3,910 (6.9) 4,141 (6.9) 4,080 (6.6) 4,411 (6.8)
Vintage (years)
  0 1,048 (2.0) 1,092 (2.0) 1,212 (2.3) 1,267 (2.1) 1,211 (2.1) 1,208 (2.0) 1,211 (2.0) 1,247 (1.9)
  1–2 22,345 (42.7) 22, 313 (40.4) 22,715 (42.2) 23,473 (39.6) 23,750 (41.8) 23,667 (39.3) 25,283 (40.9) 25,279 (39.0)
  3–4 13,588 (26.0) 13,867 (25.1) 13,944 (25.9) 14,976 (25.3) 14,644 (25.8) 14,868 (24.7) 16,214 (26.2) 16,244 (25.0)
  5–9 11,154 (21.3) 12,521 (22.7) 11,783 (21.9) 13,766 (23.2) 12,981 (22.9) 14,247 (23.7) 14,042 (22.7) 15,725 (24.3)
  10+ 4,152 (7.9) 5,385 (9.8) 4,230 (7.9) 5,743 (9.7) 4,210 (7.4) 6,258 (10.4) 5,050 (8.2) 6,404 (9.9)
Adherent to dialysis 45,103 (86.3) 43,760 (79.3) 48,130 (89.3) 48,103 (81.2) 50,383 (88.7) 49,028 (81.4) 55,611 (90.0) 53,753 (82.8)
Mean hospital days (SD) 8.4 (14.8) 10.3 (18.1) 8.3 (14.6) 10.5 (18.3) 8.6 (15.2) 11.0 (19.0) 8.9 (15.8) 11.6 (19.6)
Oxygen Use 5,090 (9.7) 6,085 (11.0) 5,574 (10.3) 6,890 (11.6) 6,218 (10.9) 7,954 (13.2) 7,258 (11.7) 9,058 (14.0)
Atherosclerotic heart disease 17,993 (34.4) 18,675 (33.9) 17,886 (33.2) 19,050 (32.2) 19,478 (34.3) 19,901 (33.0) 23,584 (38.2) 24,461 (37.7)
Congestive heart failure 18,572 (35.5) 20,585 (37.3) 17,885 (33.2) 20,961 (35.4) 19,174 (33.8) 21,444 (35.6) 22,408 (36.3) 25.428 (39.2)
TIA 7,197 (13.8) 8,602 (15.6) 6,725 (12.5) 8,540 (14.4) 7,102 (12.5) 8,389 (13.9) 8,675 (14.0) 10,430 (16.1)
Peripheral vascular disease 16,028 (30.7) 17,680 (32.0) 15,315 (28.4) 17,794 (30.0) 16,423 (28.9) 17,938 (29.8) 19,759 (32.0) 21,761 (33.5)
Other cardiac 13,950 (26.7) 15,004 (27.2) 12,602 (23.4) 14,684 (24.8) 13,693 (24.1) 14,933 (24.8) 16,178 (26.2) 18,084 (27.9)
Liver disease 13,060 (25.0) 14,513 (26.3) 3,712 (6.9) 4,853 (8.2) 3,005 (5.3) 4,267 (7.1) 2,705 (4.4) 3,556 (5.5)
COPD 7,563 (14.5) 8,406 (15.2) 7,435 (13.8) 8,523 (14.4) 8,207 (14.5) 8,932 (14.8) 10,104 (16.4) 11,210 (17.3)
Gastrointestinal bleed 5,212 (10.0) 6,191 (11.2) 5,118 (9.5) 6,215 (10.5) 5,108 (9.0) 6,182 (10.3) 5,706 (9.2) 6,951 (10.7)
Dysrhythmia 13,354 (25.5) 13,883 (25.2) 11,443 (21.2) 12,745 (21.5) 12,129 (21.4) 13,123 (21.8) 14,158 (22.9) 15,547 (24.0)
Cancer 4,031 (7.7) 4,161 (7.5) 3,272 (6.1) 3,648 (6.2) 3,331 (5.9) 3,501 (5.8) 3,897 (6.3) 4,028 (6.2)
Diabetes 26,598 (50.9) 27,609 (50.0) 26,106 (48.5) 28,402 (48.0) 27,819 (49.0) 28,690 (47.6) 32,682 (52.9) 33,863 (52.2)

All influenza seasons were predominated by the A/H3N2 strain and were severe influenza seasons. Influenza seasons began between late November and early January (Table 2).

Table 2.

Description of influenza season

1997 1998 1999 2001
% Serologic Match 19% 90% 97% 100%
Predominate strain A(H3N2) A(H3N2), B A(H3N2) A(H3N2), B
Start of flu season (10%) 12/31/1997 1/13/1999 11/24/1999 1/9/2002
Start of flu season (5%) 12/24/1997 12/30/1998 11/10/1999 12/19/2001

Conventional analysis comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated patients resulted in average, adjusted VE estimates of 13%, 16%, and 30% for ILI, influenza/pneumonia hospitalization and death, respectively (Table 3). Adjustment for measured confounders increased all VE estimates slightly. However, when limited to the period prior to the start of influenza season the estimates were similar or stronger, which strongly suggests that confounding bias is present. The adjusted HR for death in the pre-influenza period ranged from 0.36 to 0.51, indicating that there is severe bias in the comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated for the outcome of all-cause mortality. Defining the start of influenza season with an earlier date (5% of isolates positive) resulted in even more biased estimates (Table 3).

Table 3.

Estimates of vaccine effectiveness comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated by year

Year No. Events No. Lost/
Transplant
Crude HR
95% CI
Adjusted HR*
95% CI
Adjusted HR in pre-
flu period
95% CI
Adjusted HR in pre-
flu period
95% CI
1997
  ILI 30,107 2,807 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) 0.89 (0.87, 0.91) 0.90 (0.88, 0.92) 0.76 (0.73, 0.79)
  Influenza/Pneumonia hosp. 16,081 3,035 0.92 (0.89, 0.95) 0.86 (0.83, 0.89) 0.87 (0.85, 0.90) 0.75 (0.70, 0.80)
  Death 23,397 3,144 0.77 (0.75, 0.79) 0.70 (0.68, 0.72) 0.48 (0.46, 0.51) 0.47 (0.44, 0.49)
1998
  ILI 33,552 2,848 0.94 (0.92, 0.96) 0.88 (0.86, 0.90) 0.77 (0.74, 0.80) 0.74 (0.71, 0.77)
  Influenza/Pneumonia hosp. 17,969 3,048 0.91 (0.88, 0.94) 0.84 (0.81, 0.87) 0.75 (0.71, 0.80) 0.73 (0.68, 0.78)
  Death 25,768 3,159 0.79 (0.77, 0.81) 0.72 (0.70, 0.74) 0.51 (0.48, 0.53) 0.46 (0.44, 0.49)
1999
  ILI 34,837 2,783 0.94 (0.92, 0.96) 0.87 (0.85, 0.89) 0.67 (0.64, 0.71) 0.62 (0.58, 0.66)
  Influenza/Pneumonia hosp. 18,893 3,020 0.90 (0.87, 0.93) 0.84 (0.81, 0.86) 0.63 (0.58, 0.68) 0.56 (0.51, 0.62)
  Death 26,904 3,150 0.76 (0.74, 0.78) 0.70 (0.68, 0.72) 0.36 (0.33, 0.39) 0.28 (0.25, 0.31)
2001
  ILI 40,768 3,031 0.90 (0.88, 0.92) 0.86 (0.84, 0.88) 0.76 (0.73, 0.79) 0.69 (0.66, 0.72)
  Influenza/Pneumonia hosp. 22,658 3,280 0.87 (0.85, 0.90) 0.82 (0.80, 0.85) 0.71 (0.68, 0.76) 0.64 (0.60, 0.69)
  Death 30,221 3,417 0.76 (0.74, 0.78) 0.70 (0.68, 0.71) 0.46 (0.44, 0.49) 0.40 (0.37, 0.43)
*

Adjusted for age, race, sex, cause of ESRD, vintage, adherence, hospital days, mobility aids, network, comorbidities, and oxygen use

Pre-flu period as defined by 10% of isolates positive for influenza

Pre-flu period as defined by 5% of isolates positive for influenza

Vaccinated patients in all matched years had more events than vaccinated patients in the unmatched year, and there was little difference in the survival curves for each outcome (Figure 1). The models for 1998 vs. 1997 and 1999 vs. 1997 produced similar results, showing no benefit for any of the three outcomes. The comparison between 2001 vs. 1997 produced a small beneficial effect. The pooled ratio of hazard ratios comparing matched seasons to a placebo season resulted in a VE of 0% (95% CI: −3,2%) for ILI, 2% (95% CI: −2,5%) for influenza/pneumonia hospitalization, and 0% (95% CI: −3,3%) for death (Table 4). Neither limiting the model to run only through the end of the influenza season (data not shown) nor restricting the ILI definition (Appendix 2) appreciably changed the estimates. Starting follow-up on December 1 resulted in slightly stronger estimates, with the confidence intervals for ILI and hospitalization excluding the null (Appendix 2).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Unadjusted, pooled survival curves among the vaccinated for A) ILI B) Influenza/pneumonia hospitalization C) Death

Table 4.

Ratio of hazard ratios (RHR) that estimate VE by comparing matched vs mismatched years among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated

1998 vs. 1997
Crude RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR*
95% CI
1999 vs. 1997
Crude RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR
95% CI
2001 vs. 1997
Crude RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR
95% CI
Pooled vs. 1997
Adjusted RHR
95% CI
ILI 1.03 (1.00, 1.07) 1.03 (1.00, 1.07) 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.97 (0.94, 1.00) 0.98 (0.95, 1.01) 1.00 (0.98, 1.03)
Influenza/pneumonia hospitalization 1.02 (0.97, 1.06) 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) 1.00 (0.96, 1.05) 0.99 (0.95, 1.04) 0.95 (0.92, 0.99) 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) 0.98 (0.95, 1.02)
Death 1.03 (0.99, 1.06) 1.02 (0.99, 1.06) 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) 1.00 (0.96, 1.03) 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) 1.00 (0.97, 1.03)
*

Adjusted for age, race, sex, cause of ESRD, vintage, adherence, hospital days, mobility aids, network, comorbidities, and oxygen use

Comment

In this population-based study, we analyzed the natural experiment created by year-to-year variation in the match of the influenza vaccine to the circulating virus. We used the vaccine during a mismatched year as a working “placebo” and compared its effectiveness to well-matched vaccines in subsequent years. We found little evidence that the well-matched vaccines were more effective than the mismatched vaccine for the prevention of ILI, influenza/pneumonia hospitalization and all-cause mortality among hemodialysis patients.

We also conducted traditional analyses, comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated patients. These analyses revealed strong evidence of unobserved confounding. In all years, we found that the vaccinated patients were at decreased risk for all outcomes even before influenza began circulating in the community. Despite adjusting for many clinical factors, these analyses remained biased. Comparing patients who are vaccinated in one year to patients who are vaccinated in another year was a way to implicitly control for unmeasured aspects of health, functional status, and health behaviors that may differ between the vaccinated and unvaccinated.27

It has been shown that ESRD patients have some level of immune dysfunction that may limit their ability to respond adequately to the influenza vaccine. Specifically, these patients have fewer B-cells due to apoptosis and inflammatory cytokines pushing immune cell differentiation toward the T-cell pathway.28,29 While immunogenicity studies have shown that ESRD patients can produce antibodies, antibody production may not be sufficient to provide protection from influenza infection.

As ESRD patients may have similar levels of immune deficiency as the elderly, our results are consistent with recent work in the elderly population. Fireman et al. reported an estimate of VE for all-cause mortality of 5% (1,8%),30 while Baxter et al. reported estimates for influenza/pneumonia hospitalizations of 12% (2,22%) in persons aged 50–64, and 9% (3,14%) in those aged 65 years and older.14 Jackson et al. estimated VE for community-acquired pneumonia among the elderly as 8% (−10,23%).12 Caution is needed, however, in comparing ESRD patients to the general elderly population. ESRD patients are seen at medical facilities 2–3 times per week for dialysis, therefore the reasons for being vaccinated may be different.

Our results comparing different influenza seasons differed from a previous observational study of influenza VE in ERSD patients. The previous study compared vaccinated to unvaccinated patients and reported VE estimates during the 1998–99 matched season of 14% (8%, 23%) for influenza/pneumonia hospitalizations and 23% (19%, 27%) for all-cause mortality.6 These results were similar to our conventional adjusted estimates. By limiting our conventional analysis to the pre-influenza period, we showed that the traditional epidemiologic approach may exaggerate the benefits of vaccination.

There are limitations to this study. First, we have assumed that the vaccine was ineffective in preventing clinical outcomes in the 1997 season. If the vaccine provided some benefit, the difference in effectiveness between the match and the mismatched years would be narrowed and thus our estimate would be closer to the null than the true estimate. However, evidence from a randomized controlled trial showed that the vaccine did not protect against clinical outcomes among younger, healthier people.17 Moreover, the vaccine is even less likely to have provided protection to an immune-compromised population. Second, because we used administrative claims data, we may have not adequately captured all of the important confounders, particularly variables that changed between years, such as quality of care, temperature variations, or other circulating viruses. We did however; adjust for a variety of clinical characteristics and this is the first study of our knowledge to account for adherence to dialysis, which may be an important predictor of exposure to preventive healthcare services. Additionally, we limited the comparisons to a five year period to limit temporal changes. Third, it is likely that the ILI outcome was under-ascertained. Unless physicians were making their diagnosis based in part on the patient’s vaccination status during the visit, this misclassification would be non-differential. If a true effect did exist, we would expect the estimate to be stronger for a more specific influenza outcome, such as ILI, as compared to a less specific outcome, such as mortality. Our estimates did not reflect this trend, therefore, it is possible that our estimate for ILI may be biased toward the null. Finally, we may have missed some vaccinations if patients received a vaccine that was paid out of pocket. Because influenza vaccine is covered by Medicare for our study population and dialysis patients have healthcare encounters 2–3 times per week, we expect that the number of people who paid out of pocket would be low. These limitations cannot rule out a protective effect of the vaccine; however, we think our findings suggest the effect may be smaller than previously believed.

The findings of this study should not be interpreted to mean that the practice of influenza vaccination be discouraged. Rather, it suggests that current strategies for vaccination, which rely on single dosing with a trivalent inactivated influenza virus, should be re-evaluated. Alternative vaccine formulations exist, and may be more suitable for the dialysis population. For example, adjuvants such as AS03 and MF59 can act as a delivery system for the virus and potentiate the immunogenic response. One recent study demonstrated a significantly higher antibody response in hemodialysis patients using AS03a adjuvant vaccine compared to the standard vaccine.31 High dose vaccine that contains three times the amount of virus as compared to standard vaccine, also offers an alternative strategy. Future studies should examine the clinical effectiveness of these alternate vaccination strategies.

In summary, our analysis suggests that the potential health benefits of the current influenza vaccine may be small to negligible in the dialysis population. Conventional analyses examining vaccinated to unvaccinated groups are prone to bias. While it is premature to discontinue vaccinating high-risk patients, alternate vaccination strategies should be investigated in ESRD patients to achieve better health outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Financial disclosures: Dr. Weber serves as consultant and speaker for Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Pastuer. Dr. Brookhart received research support from Amgen and has served as a scientific advisor for Amgen, Rockwell Medical, and Pfizer (honoraria declined, donated, or paid to institution). He received consulting fees from Crimson Health, DaVita Clinical Research, the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, and World Health Information Consultants. Dr. Sturmer received salary support from the UNC Center of Excellence in Pharmacoepidemiology and Public Health and receives salary support from unrestricted research grants from pharmaceutical companies to UNC.

Funding/support: This work was supported by an unrestricted fellowship from the UNC-GlaxoSmithKline Center of Excellence in Pharmacoepidemiology and Public Health at the University of North Carolina, Gillings School of Global Public Health.

Role of the sponsor: The sponsor had no role in the study design, data analysis or manuscript preparation.

The data reported here have been supplied by the United States Renal Data System (USRDS). The interpretation and reporting of these data are the responsibility of the authors and in no way should be seen as an official policy or interpretation of the U.S. government.

Abbreviations

CI

confidence interval

ESRD

end-stage renal disease

HR

hazard ratio

ILI

influenza-like illness

RHR

ratio of hazard ratios

VE

vaccine effectiveness

Appendix 1

Codes used to define ILI and use of mobility aids

ILI outcome
Condition
ICD-9-CM Code % of ILI outcome (all years)

Influenza 487.0, 487.1, 487.8 3.2
Upper respiratory infections 465 8.7
Acute laryngitis and tracheitis 464 0.4
Acute bronchitis and bronchiolitis 466 11.5
Bronchitis not specified 490 7.3
Pulmonary collapse 518.0 9.1
Acute respiratory failure 518.81 14.9
Unspecified viral pneumonia 480.9 0.4
Bronchopneumonia organism unspecified 485 1.3
Pneumonia organism unspecified 486 41.3
Secondary bacterial pneumonias:
  Klebsiella pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus, Staphylococcus 482.0, 482.2, 482.3, 482.4 1.9

Mobility aid
Description
HCPCS code

Use of wheelchair E0950 – E1228, E1230, E1240 – E1298
Use of walker/cane E0130, E0135, E0140, E0141, E0143, E0144, E0147, E0148, E0149, E0105, E0100
Use of modified bathroom equipment E0240 – E0248

Appendix 2

Sensitivity analyses: ratio of hazard ratios (RHR) that estimate VE by comparing matched vs mismatched years among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated

1998 vs. 1997 1999 vs. 1997 2001 vs. 1997 Pooled vs. 1997
Crude RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR*
95% CI
Crude RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR
95% CI
Crude RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR
95% CI
Adjusted RHR
95% CI
Specific ILI codes 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) 1.03 (1.00, 1.06) 1.01 (0.98, 1.04) 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) 0.97 (0.94, 1.00) 0.98 (0.95, 1.02) 1.00 (0.98, 1.03)
Start follow-up on 12/1
  ILI 1.00 (0.97, 1.04) 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) 0.98 (0.95, 1.02) 0.97 (0.93, 1.00) 0.93 (0.90, 0.96) 0.94 (0.91, 0.97) 0.97 (0.94, 0.99)
  Hospitalization 0.98 (0.94, 1.03) 0.98 (0.93, 1.02) 0.99 (0.94, 1.03) 0.97 (0.93, 1.02) 0.92 (0.88, 0.96) 0.93 (0.89, 0.97) 0.96 (0.92, 0.99)
  Death 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) 1.01 (0.97, 1.06) 0.99 (0.95, 1.03) 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) 0.95 (0.91, 0.99) 0.95 (0.92, 0.99) 0.99 (0.95, 1.02)
*

Adjusted for age, race, sex, cause of ESRD, vintage, adherence, hospital days, mobility aids, network, comorbidities, and oxygen use

Footnotes

Author contributions: Leah McGrath, Alan Brookhart, and Lily Wang had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study design: McGrath, Kshirsagar, Cole, Weber, Sturmer, Brookhart.

Acquisition of the data: Brookhart, Wang.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: McGrath, Wang, Brookhart, Kshirsagar.

Drafting the manuscript: McGrath, Brookhart.

Critical revision of the manuscript: McGrath, Kshirsagar, Cole, Weber, Sturmer, Brookhart.

Statistical analysis: McGrath, Wang, Brookhart.

Study supervision: Brookhart.

References

  • 1.Simonsen L, Reichert TA, Viboud C, Blackwelder WC, Taylor RJ, Miller MA. Impact of Influenza Vaccination on Seasonal Mortality in the US Elderly Population. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(3):265–272. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.3.265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Eickhoff TC. Immunization against Influenza: :Rationale and Recommendations. J Infect Dis. 1971;123(4):446–454. doi: 10.1093/infdis/123.4.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Vogtländer NPJ, Brown A, Valentijn RM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus ADME. Impaired response rates, but satisfying protection rates to influenza vaccination in dialysis patients. Vaccine. 2004;22(17–18):2199–2201. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brydak LB, Roszkowska-Blaim M, Machala M, Leszczynska B, Sieniawska M. Antibody response to influenza immunization in two consecutive epidemic seasons in patients with renal diseases. Vaccine. 2000;18(28):3280–3286. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(00)00126-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kunisaki KM, Janoff EN. Influenza in immunosuppressed populations: a review of infection frequency, morbidity, mortality, and vaccine responses. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(8):493–504. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70175-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gilbertson DT, Unruh M, McBean AM, Kausz AT, Snyder JJ, Collins AJ. Influenza vaccine delivery and effectiveness in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int. 2003;63(2):738–743. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00787.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Nichol KL, Nordin JD, Nelson DB, Mullooly JP, Hak E. Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccine in the Community-Dwelling Elderly. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(14):1373–1381. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nichol KL, Baken L, Nelson A. Relation between influenza vaccination and outpatient visits, hospitalization, and mortality in elderly persons with chronic lung disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(5):397–403. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-5-199903020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nichol KL, Nordin J, Mullooly J, Lask R, Fillbrandt K, Iwane M. Influenza Vaccination and Reduction in Hospitalizations for Cardiac Disease and Stroke among the Elderly. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(14):1322–1332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa025028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jackson LA, Nelson JC, Benson P, et al. Functional status is a confounder of the association of influenza vaccine and risk of all cause mortality in seniors. Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(2):345–352. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jackson LA, Jackson ML, Nelson JC, Neuzil KM, Weiss NS. Evidence of bias in estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness in seniors. Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Apr 1;35(2):337–344. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyi274. 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jackson ML, Nelson JC, Weiss NS, Neuzil KM, Barlow W, Jackson LA. Influenza vaccination and risk of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent elderly people: a population-based, nested case-control study. Lancet. 2008;372(9636):398–405. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61160-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Simonsen L, Taylor RJ, Viboud C, Miller MA, Jackson LA. Mortality benefits of influenza vaccination in elderly people: an ongoing controversy. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7(10):658–666. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70236-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Baxter R, Ray GT, Fireman BH. Effect of influenza vaccination on hospitalizations in persons aged 50 years and older. Vaccine. 2010;28(45):7267–7272. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.08.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.CDC. Update: Influenza Activity -- United States and Worldwide, 1997–98 Season, and Composition of the 1998–99 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR. 1998;47(14):280–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.CDC. Update: Influenza Activity-United States, 1997–98 Season. MMWR. 1998;47:196–200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Meltzer MI, et al. Effectiveness and Cost-Benefit of Influenza Vaccination of Healthy Working Adults. JAMA. 2000;284(13):1655–1663. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.13.1655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.CDC. Update: Influenza Activity - United States and Worldwide, 1998–99 Season, and Composition of the 1999–2000 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR. 1999;48(18):374–378. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.CDC. Update: Influenza Activity --- United States and Worldwide, 1999–2000 Season, and Composition of the 2000–01 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR. 2000;49(17):375–381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.CDC. Update: Influenza Activity --- United States and Worldwide, 2001–02 Season, and Composition of the 2002–03 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR. 2002;51(23):503–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.CDC. Update: Influenza Activity --- United States and Worldwide, 2000–01 Season, and Composition of the 2001–02 Influenza Vaccine. MMWR. 2001;55(22):466–470. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Lindsay L, Jackson L, Savitz D, et al. Community Influenza Activity and Risk of Acute Influenza-like Illness Episodes among Healthy Unvaccinated Pregnant and Postpartum Women. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163(9):838–848. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu J, Huang Z, Gilbertson DT, Foley RN, Collins AJ. An improved comorbidity index for outcome analyses among dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2010;77(2):141–151. doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cox DR. Regression Models and Life Tables (with Discussion) J R Stat Soc B. 1972;34:187–220. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Efron B. The Efficiency of Cox's Likelihood Function for Censored Data. J Am Stat Assoc. 1977;72(359):557–565. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.U.S. Renal Data System. USRDS 2010 Annual Data Report: Atlas of Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Brookhart MA, Patrick AR, Dormuth C, et al. Adherence to Lipid-lowering Therapy and the Use of Preventive Health Services: An Investigation of the Healthy User Effect. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166(3):348–354. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwm070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fernández-Fresnedo G, Ramos MA, González-Pardo MC, de Francisco ALM, López-Hoyos M, Arias M. B lymphopenia in uraemia is related to an accelerated in vitro apoptosis and dysregulation of Bcl-2. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2000;15(4):502–510. doi: 10.1093/ndt/15.4.502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Girndt M, Sester M, Sester U, Kaul H, KÖhler H. Molecular aspects of T- and B-cell function in uremia. Kidney Int Suppl. 2001;(78):S–206. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.59780206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fireman B, Lee J, Lewis N, Bembom O, van der Laan M, Baxter R. Influenza Vaccination and Mortality: Differentiating Vaccine Effects From Bias. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(5):650–656. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dikow R, Eckerle I, Ksoll-Rudek D, et al. Immunogenicity and Efficacy in Hemodialysis Patients of an AS03A-Adjuvanted Vaccine for 2009 Pandemic Influenza A(H1N1): A Nonrandomized Trial. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011;57(5):716–723. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.11.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES