Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jul 7;9(7):e101988. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101988

Phenotypes and Genotypes of Old and Contemporary Porcine Strains Indicate a Temporal Change in the S. aureus Population Structure in Pigs

Carmen Espinosa-Gongora 1, Arshnee Moodley 1, Urszula Lipinska 2, Els M Broens 3, Katleen Hermans 2, Patrick Butaye 2,4, Luc A Devriese 2, Freddy Haesebrouck 2, Luca Guardabassi 1,*
Editor: Herminia de Lencastre5
PMCID: PMC4084899  PMID: 25000530

Abstract

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus sequence type ST398 has recently gained attention due to the spread of methicillin-resistant strains among people exposed to livestock. The aim of this study was to explore temporal changes in the population structure of S. aureus in pigs over the last 40 years with particular reference to the occurrence of ST398.

Methods

We analysed a unique collection of 91 porcine strains isolated in six countries between 1973 and 2009 using a biotyping scheme described in the 1970's in combination with spa typing and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST). The collection comprised 32 historical isolates from 1973–1974 (n = 19) and from 1991–2003 (n = 13), and 59 contemporary isolates from 2004–2009. The latter isolates represented the most common MLST types (ST1, ST9, ST97 and ST433) and spa types isolated from pigs in Europe.

Results and Discussion

S. aureus sequence type ST398 was not found among old isolates from the 1970's or from 1991–2003, suggesting that this lineage was absent or present at low frequencies in pigs in the past. This hypothesis is supported by the observed association of ST398 with the ovine ecovar, which was not described in pigs by studies carried out in the 1970's. In addition, various phenotypic and genotypic differences were observed between old and contemporary isolates. Some biotypes commonly reported in pigs in the 1970's were either absent (human ecovar) or rare (biotype A) among contemporary isolates. Nine clonal lineages found among old porcine isolates are occasionally reported in pigs today (ST8, ST30, ST97, ST387, ST1092, ST2468) or have never been described in this animal host (ST12, ST133, ST1343). These results indicate that the population structure of porcine S. aureus has changed over the last 40 years and confirm the current theory that S. aureus ST398 does not originate from pigs.

Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a ubiquitous bacterial species able to colonize and cause infections in a wide range of hosts. The host specificity of S. aureus was first investigated in the 1970's and 1980's by a series of studies based on biotyping [1][5]. These early studies described phenotypic differences between S. aureus isolated from humans and different animal species. Devriese [2] proposed a biotyping scheme based on four phenotypic tests to classify S. aureus lineages in biotypes. Some biotypes were regarded as host specific (ecovars), while others were regarded as non-host specific (NHS-biotypes). Over the years, this biotyping approach has been replaced by genotypic methods such as spa typing and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST), which have several advantages over phenotypic methods [6], [7]. To the best of our knowledge, possible associations between the biotypes described in the 1970's and the genotypes described nowadays in pigs have not been investigated prior to this study.

In recent years, S. aureus isolates belonging to sequence type (ST) 398 have gained interest as a zoonotic agent following the emergence of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. The zoonotic potential of ST398 has been confirmed by several studies reporting infections in humans exposed to livestock [8][13]. This lineage is widespread in pigs [14][16] but has also been reported in other domestic animals such as cattle, broilers and horses [17][19]. Recently it has been hypothesized that ST398 originated from the human host and was transferred to livestock with subsequent gain of tetracycline and methicillin resistance [20].

The aim of the study was to identify possible changes in the population structure of S. aureus in pigs over the last 40 years with particular reference to the occurrence of ST398. For this purpose, a unique collection of 91 porcine strains collected from six countries between 1973 and 2009 was analysed using the old biotyping scheme described by Devriese [2] in combination with current genotypic methods.

Materials and Methods

Strains

We assembled a unique collection of 91 epidemiologically-unrelated porcine S. aureus isolates from six countries, including 32 historical isolates from 1973–1974 (n = 19) [2] and 1991–2003 (n = 13), and 59 contemporary isolates from 2004–2009 (Table 1). The historical collection covered all major biotypes described in pigs by Devriese and other authors investigating the diversity of S. aureus in the 1970's and 1980's [1][4]. To avoid overrepresentation of ST398 among contemporary isolates, we included 16 non-ST398 isolates belonging to all lineages described in pigs in Europe (ST1, ST9, ST97 and ST433) [15], [21] that were available within the networks of the four participating institutions (see acknowledgments). Within ST398, we selected 43 isolates based on spa type and country of origin to address as much as possible the diversity existing within this lineage. Some of these strains have been included in previous work [2], [15], [22][28].

Table 1. Year of isolation, genetic background and country of origin of the 91 S. aureus porcine isolates included in the study.

Years spa types (n) ST (CC) Country*
1973–1974 t127 (1) ST1 (CC1) BE
t008 (1) ST8 (CC8)
t337 (1), t526 (3) ST9, ST1092 (CC9)
t156 (1) ST12 (CC12)
t012 (1), t318 (7) ST30, ST2468 (CC30)
t1236 (1), t2112 (2) ST387 (CC97)
t213 (1) ST1343 (CC1343)
1991–2003 t127 (1) ST1 (CC1) NL
t337 (1), t899 (5), t1334 (1), t3446 (1), ST9 (CC9) DK, HK, NL
t2112 (2) ST97 (CC97) NL
t12057 (1) ST133 (CC133) NL
t318 (1), t1130 (1), t1921 (1), t2840 (1), t3427 (3) ST433, N.D. (CC30) NL, DK
2004–2009 t127 (1) ST1 (CC1) NL
t337 (2), t2498 (1) ST9 (CC9) DK, NL
t318 (2), t1333 (3), t3427 (1) ST433 (CC30) NL, DK
t011 (13), t034 (11), t108 (3), t567 (1), t571 (3), t899 (1), t1254 (1), t1255 (4), t1730 (1), t1793 (1), t2876 (2), t2922 (1), t4838 (1) ST398 (CC398) BE, CA, DK, IT, NL
Total isolates 91

N.D. ST unknown. The spa type was associated to CC30 on the basis of previous work [15], [29].

*Belgium (BE), Canada (CA), Denmark (DK), Hong Kong (HK), Italy (IT), The Netherlands (NL).

Biotyping

All 91 isolates were biotyped following the method described by Devriese in 1984 [2]. The method includes four phenotypic tests: production of staphylokinase (K), β-haemolysin (β), coagulation of bovine plasma (BPC) and growth on crystal violet agar (CV) (Table 2). The combination of the test results generate four host-specific biotypes (ecovars) namely human, poultry, bovine and ovine, and five non-host-specific biotypes (NHS-biotypes) individually named after the test results: K− β+ CV:A (biotype A), K+ β− CV:A (biotype B), K+ β+ CV:A (biotype C), K− β− CV:C (biotype D) and K− β+ CV:C (biotype E). According to the original classification by Devriese, combinations of test results that did not correspond to any of the described biotypes were considered not allotted.

Table 2. Staphylococcus aureus biotypes as published by Devriese in 1984 [2].

Biotype* Staphylokinase β-haemolysin Bovine plasma coagulation Crystal violet growth type
Host-specific ecovars
Human ecovar + C
Human ecovar β + + + C
Poultry ecovar A
Bovine ecovar + + A
Ovine ecovar + + C
Non-host-specific (NHS) biotypes **
K− β+ CV:A + A
K+ β− CV:A + A
K+ β+ CV:A + + A
K− β− CV:C C
K− β+ CV:C + C

* Abbreviations derived from staphylokinase (K), β-haemolysin (β) and crystal violet growth type (CV).

** NHS-biotypes correspondence in this study: K− β+ CV:A (biotype A), K+ β− CV:A (biotype B), K+ β+ CV:A (biotype C), K− β− CV:C (biotype D) and K− β+ CV:C (biotype E).

Genotyping

All isolates were spa typed as described previously [6]. MLST [7] was performed on 10 of the porcine isolates from the 1970's including one representative of each spa type found in this collection. ST398 isolates were confirmed by a CC398-specific PCR targeting sau1-hsdS1 [18]. The remaining isolates were MLST-typed unless STs were available from previous studies [15], [23] or spa-ST associations were described in the scientific literature [15], [29][33]. MRSA isolates were identified by PCR detection of mecA [34].

Results

Various remarkable differences were observed in the distribution of biotypes between porcine historical and contemporary isolates. The human ecovar and biotype B were only present in the historical collection (3 and 1 of 32 isolates, respectively), whereas biotype D was only present in the contemporary collection (1 of 59 isolates). Biotype E was the prevalent biotype in both collections and was associated to CC30 among historical isolates and to both CC30 and ST398 among contemporary isolates (Table 3). ST398 isolates belonged to either the ovine ecovar (23/43) or biotype E (20/43). None of the historical isolates from 1973–1974 belonged to the ovine ecovar. The only historical isolate displaying this biotype was a ST133 strain isolated in The Netherlands in 1991.

Table 3. Distribution of biotypes among S. aureus porcine isolates from the historical periods (1973–1974) and (1991–2003) and contemporary period (2004–2009) belonging to different sequence types (ST) or clonal complexes (CC).

Biotype ST (spa types) Time (n)
Human ecovar ST8 (t008), ST12 (t156), ST2468/CC30 (t012) 1973–1974 (3)
Poultry ecovar ST9 (t337), ST1092/CC9 (t526), ST1343/CC1343 (t213) 1973–1974 (5)
ST9 (t337, t899) 2004–2009 (2)
Bovine ecovar ST9 (t3446), ST97 (t2112) 1991–2003 (2)
ST9 (t337, t899, t1334), ST9/CC9 (t2498) 2004–2009 (4)
Ovine ecovar ST133 (t12057) 1991–2003 (1)
ST398 (t011, t034, t571, t1254, t1255, t1793) 2004–2009 (23)
Biotype A ST387/CC97 (t1236, t2112) 1973–1974 (3)
ST1 (t127), ST97 (t2112) 1991–2003 (2)
ST1 (t127) 2004–2009 (1)
Biotype B ST1 (t127) 1973–1974 (1)
Biotype D ST433/CC30 (t1333) 2004–2009 (1)
Biotype E ST30 (t318) 1973–1974 (7)
ST30 (t318), N.D./CC30 (t2840), ST433/CC30 (t1130, t1921, t3427) 1991–2003 (7)
ST30/CC30 (t318), ST433/CC30 (t1333, t3427), ST398 (t034, t108, t567, t571, t899, t1255, t1730, t2876, t2922, t4838) 2004–2009 (7)
Not allotted ST9 (t337) 1991–2003 (1)
ST9 (t899) 2004–2009 (3)

N.D. ST unknown. The spa type was associated to CC30 on the basis of previous work [15], [29].

Thirty-two spa types associated with nine CCs were found among the 91 isolates tested. Twelve and four STs were detected among historical and contemporary isolates, respectively. The 19 isolates from the 1970's belonged to 10 spa types associated with nine STs and seven clonal complexes (Table 1). ST398 was not detected in the historical collection.

MRSA ST398 isolates were mainly represented by the ovine ecovar (21/32), whereas biotype E was prevalent among methicillin-susceptible isolates (9/11). MRSA ST9 isolates were not allotted (2/4) or belonged to the bovine (1/4) and poultry (1/4) ecovars.

Discussion

The absence of S. aureus ST398 in the historical collection suggests that this lineage was absent or present at a low frequency during the 1970's and through the early 2000's. This hypothesis is further supported by the observation that the ovine ecovar, which was one of the two main biotypes associated with ST398 and the most prevalent among MRSA isolates, was neither found among the historical isolates from the 1970's nor reported in pigs by any of the studies conducted at that time in Belgium, Czechoslovakia, Russia and Greece [2], [5], [35], [36], even though in one of the studies the actual biotype of the isolates could not be defined retrospectively since the CV phenotype was not indicated in the original manuscript [36]. Our finding that ST398 is partly associated to a biotype that was not reported in pigs in the 1970's is in line with the hypothesis by Price et al [20] that this S. aureus lineage originated from humans.

Despite the small number of isolates representative of the 1970's, this unique collection contained all the major biotypes described in pigs in the past [1], [2], [5], [35] and all the most common clonal lineages reported in pigs today except ST398 [15], [37], [38]. However, marked phenotypic and genotypic differences were observed between historical and contemporary isolates, indicating that the S. aureus population structure in pigs has undergone major changes over the last 40 years. The most common biotypes among historical isolates were absent or rare among contemporary isolates and vice versa except for biotype E, which was prevalent in both groups of isolates. The two most common biotypes reported by Devriese in 1984 [2], biotype A (38/68 isolates) and the human ecovar (14/68 isolates), were represented in our historical collection (5/32 and 3/32 isolates, respectively) but were either rare (1/59 isolates belonging to biotype A) or absent (human ecovar) in our contemporary collection. A temporal reduction in the diversity of the porcine S. aureus population could be inferred on the basis of MLST since nine STs found among historical isolates could not be detected among contemporary isolates (Table 1), and are not currently associated with the pig host [15], [37], [38]. The temporal change in population structure was confirmed by spa typing since the spa types displayed by historical isolates are only occasionally reported in pigs today (t008, t012, t1236 and t526) [14], [15], [24], [38][40] or have only been reported in humans (t156 and t213) [41], [42]. Based on these data, it appears that ST398 could have displaced other lineages present in this animal reservoir in the past. This displacement is unlikely to be a direct consequence of antimicrobial use since tetracycline resistance, a typical feature of this lineage, was not uncommon among porcine isolates described in the 1970's [5] as confirmed by antimicrobial susceptibility testing of our collection (data not shown).

Interestingly, all biotypes associated with ST398 (ovine ecovar and biotype E) and the human ecovar share a common phenotype (CV type C). The assumption that ST398 has originated from humans reinforces an old hypothesis that this phenotypic trait might be conserved in S. aureus of human origin [43][45]. The human ecovar was exclusively found among isolates from the 1970's, suggesting a closer relationship between porcine and human S. aureus in those years. The human ecovar is characterized by production of staphylokinase (K+), which is encoded by sak as part of the human immune evasion cluster (IEC) in φSa3. This phage frequently inserts into the β-hemolysin gene (hlb) of human strains, thereby inactivating it [46][48]. Therefore, the presumed human origin of ST398 would have involved loss of this mobile genetic element to restore the phenotype K− β+ typical of the lineage [20], [49]. Other S. aureus lineages (e.g. CC30, CC9, CC97 and CC1) displayed two or more distinctive phenotypic traits (e.g. growth on CV agar) regardless of the time of isolation, indicating specific associations between genotypes and phenotypes.

The one and most important limitation of the study is the limited size of the strain collection, especially in relation to the small number of historical isolates from the 1970's. However, these ancient isolates retrieved from the Devriese's strain collection were representative of the diversity observed in pigs at that time. Moreover, our conclusion that 40 years ago ST398 either did not occur or was rare in pigs in Europe is not only supported by the absence of this lineage in the historical strain collection but also by the finding that most contemporary ST398 isolates display a biotype (i.e. the ovine ecovar) that has never been described in pigs in the past. The possibility that ST398 was present in pigs 30–40 years ago with a different biotype implies that this lineage underwent major changes to acquire the specific phenotype of the ovine ecovar (K− β+ BPC+ CV:C), including the phenotype on CV, which has been shown to be a stable phenotypic trait in this and other studies [44], [45]. Although distribution of S. aureus lineages is known to vary geographically, nowadays ST398 is widespread in the pig population in the two countries from which our historical isolates originated from (Belgium and The Netherlands) as well in other European countries where biotype distribution was studied in the 1970's [50]. Based on these considerations, we conclude that the outcome of the study could only be marginally influenced by the size and geographical origin of the strain collection.

Conclusions

The S. aureus population in pigs today is different to that of 30–40 years ago. Some genetic lineages seem to have disappeared, probably displaced by the spread of ST398. The absence of ST398 or associated biotypes in the porcine isolates from the 1970's through early 2000's supports the current hypothesis that this lineage does not originate from pigs.

Acknowledgments

We thank Arlette Van de Kerckhove for excellent technical assistance, and Jesper Larsen for inspiring discussion. We are also grateful to Frank M. Årestrup, Antonio Battisti, Maureen V. Boost, Henrik Hasman, Stien Vandendriessche, Wannes Vanderhaeghen and Scott Weese for strain provision.

Funding Statement

The authors have no support or funding to report.

References

  • 1. Devriese LA, Oeding P (1976) Characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from different animal species. Res Vet Sci 21: 284–291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Devriese LA (1984) A simplified system for biotyping Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from animal species. J Appl Bacteriol 56: 215–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hajek V, Marsalek E (1971) [The differentiation of pathogenic staphylococci and a suggestion for their taxonomic classification]. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A 217: 176–182. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Witte W, Grigorova M, Bajljosov D, Humel R, Korukov G (1978) Ecology of Staphylococcus aureus: comparative characterization of strains isolated from man, cattle and sheep in Bulgaria and in the GDR. J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol 22: 177–183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Oeding P, Marandon JL, Meyer W, Hajek V, Marsalek E (1972) A comparison of phage pattern and antigenic structure with biochemical properties of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from swine. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B Microbiol Immunol 80: 525–533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Harmsen D, Claus H, Witte W, Rothganger J, Turnwald D, et al. (2003) Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management. J Clin Microbiol 41: 5442–5448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG (2000) Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 38: 1008–1015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Grisold AJ, Zarfel G, Hoenigl M, Krziwanek K, Feierl G, et al. (2010) Occurrence and genotyping using automated repetitive-sequence-based PCR of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in Southeast Austria. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 66: 217–221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hartmeyer GN, Gahrn-Hansen B, Skov RL, Kolmos HJ (2010) Pig-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: family transmission and severe pneumonia in a newborn. Scand J Infect Dis 42: 318–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lozano C, Aspiroz C, Ezpeleta AI, Gomez-Sanz E, Zarazaga M, et al. (2011) Empyema caused by MRSA ST398 with atypical resistance profile, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 17: 138–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Huijsdens XW, van Dijke BJ, Spalburg E, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Heck ME, et al. (2006) Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 5: 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Schijffelen MJ, Boel CH, van Strijp JA, Fluit AC (2010) Whole genome analysis of a livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolate from a case of human endocarditis. BMC Genomics 11: 376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Aspiroz C, Lozano C, Gilaberte Y, Zarazaga M, Aldea MJ, et al. (2012) [Molecular characterisation of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains ST398 in patients with skin infections and their relatives]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 30: 18–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Dressler AE, Scheibel RP, Wardyn S, Harper AL, Hanson BM, et al. (2012) Prevalence, antibiotic resistance and molecular characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus in pigs at agricultural fairs in the USA. Vet Rec 170: 495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hasman H, Moodley A, Guardabassi L, Stegger M, Skov RL, et al. (2010) Spa type distribution in Staphylococcus aureus originating from pigs, cattle and poultry. Vet Microbiol 141: 326–331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Verhegghe M, Pletinckx LJ, Crombe F, Vandersmissen T, Haesebrouck F, et al. (2012) Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) ST398 in Pig Farms and Multispecies Farms. Zoonoses Public Health [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Feβler AT, Olde Riekerink RG, Rothkamp A, Kadlec K, Sampimon OC, et al. (2012) Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 obtained from humans and animals on dairy farms. Vet Microbiol [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. van Duijkeren E, Moleman M, Sloet van Oldruitenborgh-Oosterbaan MM, Multem J, Troelstra A, et al. (2010) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in horses and horse personnel: an investigation of several outbreaks. Vet Microbiol 141: 96–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Nemati M, Hermans K, Lipinska U, Denis O, Deplano A, et al. (2008) Antimicrobial resistance of old and recent Staphylococcus aureus isolates from poultry: first detection of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant strain ST398. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52: 3817–3819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Price LB, Stegger M, Hasman H, Aziz M, Larsen J, et al. (2012) Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. MBio 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Vandendriessche S, Vanderhaeghen W, García-Graells C, Butaye P, Denis O (2011) Genotype diversity of Staphylococcus aureus on Belgian MRSA-positive pig farms; 2011 8–11 September; Washington. [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Guardabassi L, Stegger M, Skov R (2007) Retrospective detection of methicillin resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in Danish slaughter pigs. Vet Microbiol 122: 384–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Guardabassi L, O'Donoghue M, Moodley A, Ho J, Boost M (2009) Novel lineage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Hong Kong. Emerg Infect Dis 15: 1998–2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bagcigil FA, Moodley A, Baptiste KE, Jensen VF, Guardabassi L (2007) Occurrence, species distribution, antimicrobial resistance and clonality of methicillin- and erythromycin-resistant staphylococci in the nasal cavity of domestic animals. Vet Microbiol 121: 307–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Moodley A, Espinosa-Gongora C, Nielsen SS, McCarthy AJ, Lindsay JA, et al. (2012) Comparative Host Specificity of Human- and Pig- Associated Staphylococcus aureus Clonal Lineages. PLoS ONE 7: e49344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. de Neeling AJ, van den Broek MJ, Spalburg EC, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Dam-Deisz WD, et al. (2007) High prevalence of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs. Vet Microbiol 122: 366–372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Crombé F, Willems G, Dispas M, Hallin M, Denis O, et al. (2012) Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among pigs in Belgium. Microb Drug Resist 18: 125–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Vandendriessche S, Vanderhaeghen W, Larsen J, de Mendonca R, Hallin M, et al. (2014) High genetic diversity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) from humans and animals on livestock farms and presence of SCCmec remnant DNA in MSSA CC398. J Antimicrob Chemother 69: 355–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Stegger M, Lindsay JA, Moodley A, Skov R, Broens EM, et al. (2011) Rapid PCR detection of Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 by targeting the restriction-modification system carrying sau1-hsdS1. J Clin Microbiol 49: 732–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Agersø Y, Hasman H, Cavaco LM, Pedersen K, Aarestrup FM (2012) Study of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Danish pigs at slaughter and in imported retail meat reveals a novel MRSA type in slaughter pigs. Vet Microbiol 157: 246–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. van Belkum A, Melles DC, Peeters JK, van Leeuwen WB, van Duijkeren E, et al. (2008) Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 in pigs and humans. Emerg Infect Dis 14: 479–483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Heesterbeek H, Mevius D, van Duijkeren E, et al. (2010) Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veal calf farming: human MRSA carriage related with animal antimicrobial usage and farm hygiene. PLoS One 5: e10990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Battisti A, Franco A, Merialdi G, Hasman H, Iurescia M, et al. (2010) Heterogeneity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Italian pig finishing holdings. Vet Microbiol 142: 361–366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Poulsen AB, Skov R, Pallesen LV (2003) Detection of methicillin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci and in staphylococci directly from simulated blood cultures using the EVIGENE MRSA Detection Kit. J Antimicrob Chemother 51: 419–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Akatov AK, Samsonova TM, Khatenever ML, Kushko IV, Shiriaeva VI (1983) [Classification and biological characteristics of coagulase-positive Staphylococci isolated from animals]. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Dimitracopoulos G, Kalkani-Boussiakou H, Papavassiliou J (1977) Animal fecal carriership and biotypes of Staphylococcus aureus. Appl Environ Microbiol 34: 461–464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A (2005) Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis 11: 711–714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. van der Wolf PJ, Rothkamp A, Junker K, de Neeling AJ (2012) Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and MRSA (CC398) isolated from post-mortem samples from pigs. Vet Microbiol 158: 136–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Argudin MA, Fetsch A, Tenhagen BA, Hammerl JA, Hertwig S, et al. (2010) High heterogeneity within methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates, defined by Cfr9I macrorestriction-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles and spa and SCCmec types. Appl Environ Microbiol 76: 652–658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Lozano C, Aspiroz C, Lasarte JJ, Gomez-Sanz E, Zarazaga M, et al. (2011) Dynamic of nasal colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and ST1 after mupirocin treatment in a family in close contact with pigs. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 34: e1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Hudson LO, Murphy CR, Spratt BG, Enright MC, Terpstra L, et al. (2012) Differences in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from pediatric and adult patients from hospitals in a large county in California. J Clin Microbiol 50: 573–579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Aamot HV, Blomfeldt A, Eskesen AN (2012) Genotyping of 353 Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Isolates Collected between 2004 and 2009 at a Norwegian University Hospital and Potential Associations with Clinical Parameters. J Clin Microbiol 50: 3111–3114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Meyer W (1966) [Schema for the differentiation of habitat variants of Staphylococcus aureus]. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig 201: 465–481. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Freeman R, Hudson SJ, Burdess D (1990) Crystal violet reactions of fresh clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus from two British hospitals. Epidemiol Infect 105: 493–500.2249713 [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Freeman R, Burdess D, Smith S (1994) Crystal violet reactions of coagulase negative staphylococci. J Clin Pathol 47: 283–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Coleman DC, Sullivan DJ, Russell RJ, Arbuthnott JP, Carey BF, et al. (1989) Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophages mediating the simultaneous lysogenic conversion of beta-lysin, staphylokinase and enterotoxin A: molecular mechanism of triple conversion. J Gen Microbiol 135: 1679–1697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Bae T, Baba T, Hiramatsu K, Schneewind O (2006) Prophages of Staphylococcus aureus Newman and their contribution to virulence. Mol Microbiol 62: 1035–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. van Wamel WJ, Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA (2006) The innate immune modulators staphylococcal complement inhibitor and chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus are located on beta-hemolysin-converting bacteriophages. J Bacteriol 188: 1310–1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Goerke C, Wirtz C, Fluckiger U, Wolz C (2006) Extensive phage dynamics in Staphylococcus aureus contributes to adaptation to the human host during infection. Mol Microbiol 61: 1673–1685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Scientific report of EFSA. Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008. Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates. EFSA Journal 7. [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES