Dear Editor,
The release of the cytochrome c (cyt. c) and several other protein factors from the mitochondrial intermembrane space results in the activation of caspases, proteases responsible for cell destruction during programmed cell death (PCD) and is considered an initiation and commitment point in the apoptotic pathway. Release of these factors from the mitochondria, in response to a broad range of signals or insults, is regulated by proteins in the Bcl-2 family.1,2 This family consists of both proapoptotic proteins (e.g. Bax, Bak, Bid) that promote the release of mitochondrial factors and antiapoptotic proteins (e.g. Bcl-XL and Bcl-2) that prevent the release of these factors in the absence of death signal. Proteins in this family share up to four homologous BH1–4 (Bcl-homology) domains and many of them also have C-terminal hydrophobic domain that targets these proteins to membranes. A subset of proapoptotic proteins (e.g. Bid) that contain only BH3 domain (BH3-only proteins) are located in various cellular compartments where they can be released in response to a variety of death signals, allowing them to transfer the signal to the multidomain proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bak. When activated, in part, by interaction with BH3-only proteins, both Bax and Bak oligomerize in the outer mitochondrial membrane. In vitro studies support the idea that this oligomerization results in the formation of an aqueous pore of sufficient size to facilitate translocation of cyt. c, and perhaps other components of the mitochondrial intermembrane space, into the cytosol where they then initiate and modulate the apoptotic cascade.3–5
The precise molecular mechanisms by which multidomain proapoptotic proteins like Bax and Bak are activated by BH3-only proteins have not yet been completely resolved. Additionally, it is also not clear whether pore formation forms the basis of the action of these proteins during PCD in vivo and whether pore formation in vivo requires additional components or is based on the action of these proapoptotic proteins alone. Several studies have suggested that the process of pore formation requires, or is facilitated by, the interaction of Bax (or Bak) with a yet to be identified cytosolic6 or mitochondrial protein.7 Cardiolipin (CL), a unique phospholipid of the inner mitochondrial membrane, has also been recently proposed to be required in the action of proapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins.8,9 These in vitro studies have suggested that CL is required for the Bax-mediated permeabilization of phospholipid vesicles; Bax-mediated permeabilization does not proceed in the absence of CL.9 In contrast, others10 have shown that recombinant Bax is able to induce release of cyt. c from the mitochondria lacking CL following isolation of these organelles from yeast strains in which the gene encoding for cardiolipin synthase (CL synthase; CRD1),11 required for CL synthesis, had been eliminated (Dcrd1 strains). However, phosphatidylglycerol (PG), the intermediate in the synthesis of the CL, accumulates in the mitochondrial membranes of Dcrd1 strains and is known to be able to substitute functionally for the CL.12,13 Thus, it is not yet clear whether CL or, in the absence of CL, PG is required for the in vivo mitochondrial action of proapoptotic molecules like Bax.
To test directly the requirement of either CL or PG in the in vivo action of multidomain, proapoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family, we have assessed the response of yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) lacking genes required for the synthesis of both CL and PG to the expression of Bax and Bcl-XL. Although the yeast genome does not encode Bcl-2 family members or other proteins involved in PCD in metazoan cells, expression of proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members like Bax results in yeast cell death.14–16 Once expressed, Bax is constitutively targeted to the outer mitochondrial membrane where it mediates alterations in mitochondrial function similar to those observed in mammalian cells: release of cyt. c, mitochondrial swelling, alterations of mitochondrial membrane potential, mitochondrial matrix alkalinization and cytosolic acidification.14,17–19 In contrast, antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members like Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL suppress Bax-induced cell death when coexpressed in yeast and are also targeted to the outer mitochondrial membrane.16,20,21 All results generated in these studies employing yeast strongly indicate that Bcl-2 family members act directly upon highly conserved mitochondrial components that correspond directly to their apoptotic substrates in mammalian cells, and furthermore that all cellular components necessary for the formation of pore by Bax are highly conserved and present in yeast mitochondria. Thus, the availability of yeast as an alternative system in which to study the action of the proteins of the Bcl-2 family together with the powerful techniques of yeast genetics has made it possible to test the participation of various cellular components, such as the voltage-dependent anion channel and ATP/ADP translocator, in the process of the permeabilization of the mitochondrial membrane by Bcl-2 family members.18,22–24
To test whether proapoptotic proteins like Bax require CL to kill cells in vivo, we examined Bax activity in yeast cells devoid of CL due to deletion of CRD1, the yeast gene encoding CL synthase that is required for the biosynthesis of this unique mitochondrial phospholipid.11 CRD1 was eliminated by standard gene transplacement methods. CRD1-deficient strains (Dcrd1) contained no detectable CL (Figure 1a). However, as had been noted in previous studies, Dcrd1 strains contained elevated level of PG, a biosynthetic precursor of CL (Figure 1a and Chang et al.11). These earlier studies also demonstrated that PG is able to compensate partially for the absence of CL.12,13 Consequently, we also generated CML282 derivatives in which PGS1, the gene encoding PG-P synthase,12 has been inactivated. As expected, PGS1-deficient strains (Dpgs1) contained no detectable CL or PG (Figure 1a). Low amounts of radiolabel at the positions of PG and CL do not migrate at positions of authentic PG or CL in two-dimensional systems (not shown). As expected, Dpgs1 strains were also respiratory incompetent (not shown).12
To test the ability of Bax to kill cells lacking CL and PG, we took advantage of the fact that CML282 constitutively expresses a modified tetR protein that mediates the expression of target genes placed downstream of tetO sequences in response to tetracycline or its analogs (reverse or ‘tet-on’ system). Earlier studies had demonstrated that the level of Bax expression under these conditions is proportional to the concentration of doxycycline present in the media; higher concentrations lead to higher levels of Bax expression.25 Accordingly, Dcrd1, Dpgs1 and wild-type cells were transformed with plasmid-containing sequences encoding an N-terminally, HA-tagged Bax protein downstream of the Tetinducible promoter in pCM252 in strain CML282, allowing us to regulate expression of Bax following addition of doxycycline to the media.25 When grown on media containing 1 mg/ml doxycycline, all three strains express similar levels of Bax (Figure 1b).
To evaluate the ability of Bax to inhibit growth in the absence of CL and PG, we assessed the viability of these strains following serial dilutions of cells onto plates containing increasing concentrations of doxycycline (Figure 1c). The viability of the wild-type strain is dramatically compromised at concentrations of doxycycline higher than 0.1 mg/ml, as is each of the mutant strains; the apparent increase in sensitivity of the Dcls1 and Dpgs1 strains may reflect growth defects generated by these mutations. However, the levels of Bax required to kill wild-type and mutant strains are identical, suggesting that the sensitivity to Bax in vivo is not dependent on the presence of either CL or PG.
We also assessed the ability of an antiapoptotic protein such as Bcl-XL to abrogate the cell killing effects of a proapoptotic molecule like Bax in strains devoid of CL or PG. In wild-type cells, coexpression of Bcl-XL is able to protect cells completely from the toxic effects of Bax expression.16,18,20,25 Accordingly wild-type, Dcrd1 and Dpgs1 strains containing Bax expression plasmids were cotransformed with plasmids that mediate the expression of N-terminally, HA-tagged Bcl-XL in response to the addition of doxycycline to the media; similar levels of Bcl-XL are expressed in response to doxycycline addition in each strain (Figure 1b). Strain viability was again tested by the serial dilution of each strain onto the plates with varying concentrations of doxycycline (Figure 1d). The viability of wild-type, Dcls1 and Dpgs1 strains were completely restored following coexpression of Bcl-XL at all concentration of doxycycline, suggesting that the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins do not require CL or PG for their action.
Using similar systems, our earlier studies have defined the quantitative relations between antagonist actions of Bax and Bcl-XL. These studies led to a model in which the action of Bax and Bcl-XL on the mitochondrial membranes involves the interaction of Bax and Bcl-XL with the hypothetical target in the outer mitochondrial membrane.25 In this model, Bax and Bcl-XL compete for a common target; interaction of Bax with this target leads to outer membrane permeabilization and cell death, while Bcl-XL, which interacts with the target preferentially, prevents the target from the interaction with Bax. Clearly, in this model the availability of the target would determine the sensitivity of the cell to both Bax-mediated killing and Bcl-XL-mediated rescue. The fact that absence of CL or PG does not affect yeast cell sensitivity to the action of either Bax and Bcl-XL indicates that the amount of target, the ability of target to interact with Bax and Bcl-XL and preference of the target for Bcl-XL remain unaffected by the absence of either CL or PG.
While the experiments described in this report demonstrate that the action of proapoptotic Bax and antiapoptotic Bcl-XL do not require CL or PG, the possibility that CL participates in the mitochondrial response to apoptotic signals at a different point in the cascade remains open. It has been suggested that CL may participate in the release of cyt. c by retaining a fraction of cyt. c bound to the outer surface of the inner mitochondrial membrane.10,26 In addition, several reports suggest that CL, or CL metabolites, can partition to other intracellular membranes during apoptosis.27 However, rather than active participation of CL, it may be that a decrease in CL levels due to downregulation of de novo synthesis of CL as well as increased turnover of existing CL during apoptosis, as it has been demonstrated in cardiomyocyte model,28 or the participation of CL breakdown products play a role during PCD. The precise mechanisms by which CL may participate in the apoptotic response by such mechanisms remain to be firmly established and are not addressed by the studies reported here.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Peter Griač for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from the NIH to MF (GM035759) and WD (GM056389).
References
- 1.Gross A, McDonnell JM, Korsmeyer SJ. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1899–1911. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.15.1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cory S, Adams JM. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:647–656. doi: 10.1038/nrc883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Schendel SL, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:5113–5118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Saito M, Korsmeyer SJ, Schlesinger PH. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:553–555. doi: 10.1038/35019596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pavlov EV, et al. J. Cell Biol. 2001;155:725–731. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200107057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kluck RM, et al. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:809–822. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.4.809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roucou X, et al. Biochem. J. 2002;368:915–921. doi: 10.1042/BJ20020972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Lutter M, et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:754–761. doi: 10.1038/35036395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kuwana T, et al. Cell. 2002;111:331–342. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)01036-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Iverson SL, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:1100–1107. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M305020200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang SC, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:14933–14941. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.24.14933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chang SC, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:9829–9836. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.16.9829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Zhang M, Mileykovskaya E, Dowhan W. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:43553–43556. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C200551200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ligr M, et al. FEBS Lett. 1998;438:61–65. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01227-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zha H, et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1996;16:6494–6508. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.11.6494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Priault M, et al. FEBS Lett. 1999;443:225–228. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(98)01661-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Manon S, Chaudhuri B, Guerin M. FEBS Lett. 1997;415:29–32. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)01087-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gross A, et al. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:3125–3136. doi: 10.1128/mcb.20.9.3125-3136.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Matsuyama S, et al. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:318–325. doi: 10.1038/35014006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Greenhalf W, Stephan C, Chaudhuri B. FEBS Lett. 1996;380:169–175. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00044-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Minn AJ, et al. EMBO J. 1999;18:632–643. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.3.632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Priault M, et al. Eur. J. Biochem. 1999;260:684–691. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00198.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Priault M, et al. FEBS Lett. 1999;456:232–238. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(99)00957-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kissova I, et al. FEBS Lett. 2000;471:113–118. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(00)01379-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Polcic P, Forte M. Biochem. J. 2003;374:393–402. doi: 10.1042/BJ20030690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ott M, et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:1259–1263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.241655498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sorice M, et al. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:1133–1145. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ostrander DB, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:38061–38067. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107067200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ostrander DB, et al. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:25262–25272. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103689200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]