Skip to main content
Tissue Engineering. Part A logoLink to Tissue Engineering. Part A
. 2014 May 14;20(13-14):1815–1826. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0296

Transplantation of Fetal Instead of Adult Fibroblasts Reduces the Probability of Ectopic Ossification During Tendon Repair

Zhi Fang 1,,2, Ting Zhu 1,,2, Wei Liang Shen 3, Qiao Mei Tang 1,,2, Jia Lin Chen 1,,2, Zi Yin 1,,2, Jun Feng Ji 1,,2, Boon Chin Heng 4, Hong Wei Ouyang 1,,2, Xiao Chen 1,,2
PMCID: PMC4086799  PMID: 24410299

Abstract

Although cell transplantation therapy can effectively promote functional tendon repair, occasional ectopic ossification during tendon regeneration undermines its efficacy. The effect of transplanted cell types on ectopic ossification has not yet been systematically evaluated. This study compared the rate of ectopic ossification during tendon repair upon transplantation with mouse fetal fibroblasts (FFs) and their adult counterparts (adult fibroblasts [AFs]). Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, immunofluorescence, and gene expression analysis were used to compare the spontaneous osteogenic differentiation of FFs and AFs in vitro. X-ray, histology, and gene expression analysis were used to investigate the ectopic ossification in a mouse Achilles tendon repair model in vivo. ALP staining and immunofluorescence data in vitro showed that FFs had less spontaneous osteogenic differentiation capacity, and lower expression of runt-related transcription factor 2 (runx2). For the in vivo study, the FFs transplant group displayed reduced ectopic ossification (2/7 vs. 7/7, Mann–Whitney test p<0.01) at 14 weeks post-transplantation and enhanced tendon repair (general histological score at week 6, 7.53 vs. 10.56, p<0.05). More chondrocytes formed at 6 weeks, and all mice developed bone marrow at 14 weeks post-transplantation in the AFs transplant group. Gene expression analysis of the regenerated tissue showed significantly higher expression levels of transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1) and transforming growth factor beta3 (TGF-β3) in the AFs group during the early stages of tendon repair. Our study demonstrates that transplantation of fetal instead of AFs is more promising for tendon repair, underscoring the importance of the origin of seed cells for tendon repair.

Introduction

Tendons are unique dense connective tissues that are responsible for mechanical transmission of muscle force to bone.1 Upon injury, tendons possess poor self-regeneration capacity. A variety of therapeutic strategies such as xenografts,2,3 allografts,4–6 autografts,7,8 suture9,10 and fixation11,12 have been utilized for the repair of tendon injuries, with cell transplantation showing the greatest potential for tendon regeneration.13,14 Currently, commonly used seed cells in tendon tissue engineering include mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), embryonic stem cells, tenocytes and fibroblasts. However, lack of optimal tenolineage differentitation induction or ethical problems limit the use of different types of stem cells. Tenocytes have to be directly isolated from tendon tissues, which may cause tendon defect and donor site morbidity. It is not practical to utilize these cells for tendon repair.

Since both tenocytes and skin fibroblasts are derived from mesoderm and have similar characteristics in cell morphology and extracellular matrix components, fibroblasts showed great potential to form neo-tendon tissue under specific condition.15,16 Skin fibroblasts are an easily accessible cell source from patients and do not cause donor site defect. Neo-tendon tissues engineered from human skin fibroblasts were reportedly similar to human tenocytes in vitro.15 Additionally, fibroblasts-engineered tendon are similar to tenocyte-engineered tendon in terms of histology and tensile strength in a porcine model, which suggest fibroblasts may have the potential as seed cells for tendon regeneration.16 Fibroblasts derived from foreskin have previously been utilized in Apligraf—the first tissue-engineered skin that is now widely utilized in nonhealing wound.17 However, compared to adult cells, fetal cells are essential for soft tissue regeneration, both in tendon and skin.18–20 Fetal fibroblasts (FFs) showed enhanced growth and collagen production in two- and three-dimensional culture in comparison with adult fibroblasts (AFs).18 FFs also retain hyperactive migratory and contractile phenotype, which is crucial for avoiding fibrosis or scarring.21 Moreover, spontaneous ectopic ossification of transplanted cells impedes repair of tendon injuries through cell transplantation. Hence, preventing the osteogenic differentiation of transplanted cells is crucial for successful tendon repair through cell therapy. Further studies on the mechanism of ectopic bone formation during cell transplantation therapy are therefore required.

During tendon repair, ectopic bone may form.22 There are two types of ectopic bone formation in tendon wounds: (i) endogenous cells and growth factors, including bone-related growth factors such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) cause ectopic bone formation at the repair site.23 (ii) For stem cell transplantation and tissue engineering therapy, exogenous materials or seed cells can induce ectopic bone formation.22 The presence of seed cells is thought to be the main causative factor that induces ectopic bone formation.22,24,25 However, there have so far been very few studies that have focused on the effect of seed cell origin on ectopic bone formation, which is a risk for tendon repair.22,26 In our preliminary work, we found that there is a difference of ossification ratio between FFs and AFs transplantation, which indicate the cell source influence ectopic bone formation.

Hence, we compared the induction of ectopic ossification in a mouse Achilles tendon injury model transplanted with fetal and adult skin fibroblasts. We hypothesize that transplantation of FFs can reduce ectopic bone formation with better tendon reparation, compared with AFs. This study can be subdivided into two phases: (i) isolation and identification of AFs and FFs in vitro; (ii) comparison of ectopic ossification and regeneration efficacy upon transplanting scaffold-free engineered tendons comprised of AFs and FFs, within a mouse Achilles tendon injury model.

Materials and Methods

Cell isolation and culture

AFs were isolated from the dorsal dermis of female ICR mice (2 months). The excised skin pieces were digested with 2 mL of 0.2% collagenase solution (Gibco, Grand Island, NY), followed by culture in 2 mL of Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (high glucose; Gibco, www.invitrogen.com) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, www.invitrogen.com-Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). After 24 h following digestion, fresh medium was replaced every 3 days. FFs were isolated from mouse embryos explanted from pregnant ICR mice between 10 and 12 days of gestation (E10–E12). The epidermis and dermis were separated by floating the skin on 0.5% (w/v) dispase in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 4°C overnight. Fibroblasts were isolated by mincing the dermis, and then they were grown in DMEM (high-glucose) containing 10% (v/v) FBS. Fresh culture medium was replaced every 3 days.

For the in vitro study, AFs and FFs were utilized for cell differentiation, proliferation, migration, and gene expression analysis at different time points. For the in vivo study, AFs and FFs were cultured in 10 cm dishes until they reached 90% confluency, where upon 50 μg/mL of ascorbic acid was supplemented to the culture medium for 2 weeks to encourage formation of cell sheet as engineered tendon.27 The cell sheets that formed could be detached from the substratum by applying a small roll-up force to form scaffold-free tissue-engineered tendon that was utilized for subsequent in vivo experiments. Each cell sheet formed in one 10 cm dish can be divided into six parts, each part can be applied into one leg of mouse.

Osteogenic differentiation

The osteogenic differentiation capacity of AFs and FFs were investigated in vitro as described previously.27 Spontaneous osteogenesis was confirmed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining28 after 3 days in DMEM (high-glucose) condition. The rate of osteogenesis was considered to be the ratio of the number of ALP-positive cells to the total cell number determined by 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining (Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Inc., Jiangsu, China).

Proliferation and migration capacity

Cell proliferation was measured with CCK-8. AFs and FFs cultured in DMEM (high-glucose) at desired time points (1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 days), was incubated in CCK-8 solution in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C for 3 h. The intense orange-colored formazan derivative formed by cell metabolism is soluble in the culture medium. The absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Cell number was correlated to optical density (OD). We detected cell proliferation of implanted cells by KI67 staining.

For cell migration study, cells were grown in DMEM (high-glucose) containing 10% FBS to form confluent monolayers in six-well plates and were serum-starved overnight. An artificial wound was made in the cell monolayer with a 100-μL micropipette tip. Then, the culture medium was removed and the cells washed twice with serum-free medium. At desired time points (0, 8, 24, and 48 h), wound closure was photographed to show migration capacity of AFs and FFs. Further, we used Image-pro plus software to quantify the migratory activity of AFs and FFs.

Immunofluorescence

Immunofluorescence was utilized to determine the expression of runt-related transcription factor 2 (runx2) in AFs and FFs after culture in DMEM (high-glucose) with 50 μg/mL of ascorbic acid for 3 days in vitro. Mouse anti-mouse monoclonal antibody against runx2 (1:100 dilution; Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA) was used to detect the expression of transcriptional factor-runx2. The primary antibody was omitted in the control experiment. Donkey anti-mouse IgG was used to detect the primary antibody (1:15,000 dilution; LI-COR, Inc., Lincoln, NE). We observed and imaged the results under confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss LSM 510 Meta). Further, we used Image-pro plus software to quantify the density of immunofluorescence data corresponding to the mean level of expression in nuclei.

Animal model

Sixteen female ICR mice weighing 25–30 g were utilized. The Achilles tendon was exposed through a lateral incision under general anesthesia. In the left leg, part of the Achilles tendon was removed to create a defect about 2 mm in length. Scaffold-free AFs-engineered tendons were joined to the remaining Achilles tendon using a nonresorbable suture (6-0 nylon; AFs-treated group, n=16). In the right leg, the FFs-engineered tendons were implanted (FFs-treated group, n=16). The wound was then irrigated and skin was closed with suture. Post-operatively, mice were allowed free cage activity at constant temperature with a 12-h dark–light cycle, together with unrestricted access to a standard diet and water.

At 2, 4, and 6 weeks post-transplantation, three mice were sacrificed for histological evaluation and gene expression analysis at each time point. To quantify and compare ectopic bone formation between the AFs and FFs groups, the remaining seven mice were exposed under X-ray using a noninvasive Kodak in vivo FX small animal imaging system every week. The seven mice were eventually sacrificed for further histological evaluation and gene expression analysis at 14 weeks post-transplantation. All animals were from Zhejiang University Laboratory Animal Center and treated according to the standard guidelines approved by the Zhejiang University Ethics Committee (ZJU2011101005).

Cell labeling and detection

The ADFs and FDFs utilized in the mouse Achilles tendon repair model were prestained with 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI; Sigma-Aldrich, Inc., St. Louis, MO). Briefly, the fibroblasts were incubated with 5 μL/mL DiI at 37°C for 20 min, and then washed with PBS. The DiI-dyed cells were observed under fluorescence microscopy (IX71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at 543 nm. The culture medium was replaced by serum-free medium on the day before the tissue-engineered tendon was to be implanted into animals.

Histological assessment

Specimens were fixed, dehydrated, and embedded within paraffin blocks. Histological sections (8 μm) were prepared using a microtome, and they were subsequently deparaffinized with xylene, hydrated with decreasing concentrations of ethanol and then stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). To detect proteoglycan synthesis as an indicator of cartilage production, sections were stained with 0.1% Safranin O (Sangon, Shanghai, China) for 8 min, followed by counter staining with 0.02% Fast Green, FCF (Cellchipbj, Beijing, China) for 4 min.

To quantify the degree of ectopic bone formation, we scored animal sample according to cell formation, bone structure, and bone tissue as describe in Table 1.29,30

Table 1.

Bone Histological Scoring System

Cell level Bone structure Tissue level
Osteoblasts Bone trabecules Bone tissue
 0. Absent  0. Absent  0. Absent
 1. Present at the periphery  1. Present at the periphery  1. Present at the periphery
 2. Centrally present  2. Centrally present  2. Centrally present
 3. Present at the periphery and centrally  3. Present at the periphery and centrally  3. Present at the periphery and centrally
Osteocytes Neoformation vessels Percentage area of bone tissue
 0. Absent  0. Absent  0. Absent
 1. Present at the periphery  1. Present at the periphery  1. Up to 25%
 2. Centrally present  2. Centrally present  2. Between 25% and 50%
 3. Present at the periphery and centrally  3. Present at the periphery and centrally  3. Between 50% and 75%
     4. Between 75% and 100%
Osteoclasts    
 0. Absent    
 1. Present at the periphery    
 2. Centrally present    
 3. Present at the periphery and centrally    

To quantify the degree of chondrogenesis based on Safrainin O staining, we scored the Safrainin O staining sample according to several parameters, including uniformity and darkness, distance between cells, and cell morphology.31 Further, we used Image-pro plus software to quantify the density of Safrainin O staining.

General histological scoring was performed using a blinded semi-quantitative scoring system based on six paramaters (fiber structure, fiber arrangement, rounding of the nuclei, inflammation, vascularity, cell population) of H&E staining.32

X-ray imaging and quantization using Image-pro plus software

After surgery, seven mice were exposed under X-ray (1 min duration) using a noninvasive Kodak in vivo FX small animal imaging system every week to evaluate ectopic bone formation. At 14 weeks post-transplantation, we calculated the ossification ratio of each group (number of ectopic bone formed mice/seven).

Captured images were analyzed with the Image-pro plus software to quantify the area, mean density, max density, and sum density of ectopic bone formation.

RNA isolation and real-time polymerase chain reaction

Total cellular RNA was isolated by lysis in TRIzol (Invitrogen) followed by a one-step phenol chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction procedure, following the manufacturer's instructions. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis of seven genes including transforming growth factor beta1 (TGF-β1), transforming growth factor beta2 (TGF-β2), transforming growth factor beta3 (TGF-β3), BMP4, acidic sulfated integral membrane glycoproteins (CD44), interleukin-6 (IL-6), osteocalcin (OCN), osteopontin (OPN), msh-like 2 (MSX2), alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), myogenin (Myog), runx2, and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were quantitatively analyzed by utilizing Brilliant SYBR Green QPCR Master Mix (TakaRa, DaLian, China) with a Light Cycler apparatus (ABI 7900HT), as described previously.28 The primer sequences were designed using primer 5.0 software and are listed in Table 2. Each RT-PCR was performed on at least three different experimental samples, and representative results are displayed as target gene expression normalized to GAPDH.28 Error bars represent standard deviation from the mean of technical replicates as previously described.33

Table 2.

List of Primer Sequences Utilized for Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

Genes 5′-3′ Primers Production size (bp)
TGF-β1 Forward CACCATCCATGACATGAACCG 377
  Reverse GCTTGCGACCCACGTAGTAGA  
TGF-β2 Forward ATCTCCTGCTAATGTTGTTGCC 288
  Reverse CGGAAGCTTCGGGATTTATGGT  
TGF-β3 Forward ATACCTCCGCAGCGCAGACA 185
  Reverse ACTTACACGACTTCACCACCAT  
BMP4 Forward GGAGGAGGAGGAGGAAGAGCA 162
  Reverse CTGAGGTTGAAGAGGAAACGAAA  
CD44 Forward TCATCCCAACGCTATCTGTGC 216
  Reverse CTATACTCGCCCTTCTTGCTGT  
IL-6 Forward TAACAAGAAAGACAAAGCCAGAGT 117
  Reverse GCATTGGAAATTGGGGTAGGAAG  
OCN Forward GACCATCTTTCTGCTCACTCTG 124
  Reverse TACCTTATTGCCCTCCTGCTTG  
OPN Forward CGGCACTCCAACTGCCCAAGA 192
  Reverse TGCCATTCCCGCCATCCACC  
MSX2 Forward TTCACCACATCCCAGCTTCTA 159
  Reverse TTGCAGTCTTTTCGCCTTAGC  
α-SMA Forward GGACGTACAACTGGTATTGTGC 179
  Reverse TCGGCAGTAGTCACGAAGGA  
Myog Forward CGATCTCCGCTACAGAGGC 115
  Reverse GTTGGGACCGAACTCCAGT  
Runx2 Forward CCAACTTCCTGTGCTCCGTG 238
  Reverse GTGAAACTCTTGCCTCGTCCG  
GAPDH Forward GCAAATTCAACGGCACAG 141
  Reverse CACCAGTAGACTCCACGAC  

TGF-β1, transforming growth factor beta1; TGF-β2, transforming growth factor beta2; TGF-β3, transforming growth factor beta3; BMP4, bone morphogenetic protein 4; CD44, acidic sulfated integral membrane glycoproteins; IL-6, interleukin-6; OCN, osteocalcin; OPN, osteopontin; MSX2, msh-like 2; α-SMA, alpha-smooth muscle actin; Myog, myogenin; runx2, runt-related transcription factor 2; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase.

Statistical analysis

All quantitative data sets are expressed as mean±SD. Student's t-test was performed to assess statistical significance of differences in results between datasets. We analyzed X-ray data with the Mann–Whitney test (short for “M–W test”) in the SPSS system. Values of p<0.05 were considered to be significantly different.

Results

FFs displayed less spontaneous osteogenic differentiation capacity in vitro compared with AFs

AFs and FFs were isolated from adult and fetal dermis, and both cell types displayed spindle-shaped morphology (Fig. 1A, B). Generally, AFs (Fig. 1C insert) displayed significantly higher ALP activity compared with FFs (Fig. 1D insert) cultured in normal medium without induction. The percentage of ALP positively stained cells in the AFs group is also significantly higher compared with the FFs group (Fig. 1C–G, 23.72%±5.71% vs. 4.12%±1.11%, p<0.01). Additionally, the immunofluorescence data showed significantly higher density of runx2 in the nuclei of AFs compared with FFs, when cultured in DMEM (high-glucose with ascorbic acid) for 3 days (Fig. 1H–N). Higher gene expression of runx2 (Fig. 1O) coincided with immunofluorescence data. These results thus indicated less spontaneous osteogenic differentiation capacity of FFs compared with AFs.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Isolation, culture and, osteogenic differentiation potential of AFs and FFs. (A, B) Morphology of AFs (A) and FFs (B). (C–G) ALP staining of AFs and FFs cultured in DMEM (high-glucose) for 14 days showed spontaneous osteogenesis differentiation (n=3). Gross view and microscopic view of ALP staining showed ALP-positive cells of AFs (C, E) compared to FFs (D, F). Quantification of ALP-positive cells showed that FFs had significantly lower percentage of spontaneously osteogenic differentiation cells (G, 4.1% vs. 27.3% p<0.01, n=3). (H–O) Immunofluorescence and RT-PCR results of runx2 in vitro of AFs and FFs cultured in medium with ascorbic acid (n=3). Immunofluorescence of runx2 showed higher expression in AFs group (H, J, L) compared with FFs group (I, K, M). (N) Density of runx2 was significantly higher in AFs group. (O) Gene expression of runx2 showed higher expression in AFs group (n=3). Scale bar (A–F): 200 μm, scale bar (H–M): 100 μm. ALP, alkaline phosphatase; AFs, adult fibroblasts; FFs, fetal fibroblasts; RT-PCR, real-time polymerase chain reaction; runx2, runt-related transcription factor 2; DMEM, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

RT-PCR was employed to evaluate the gene expression levels of osteogenic genes and myogenic genes by FFs and AFs on day 0, 3, 7, and 14 in scaffold-free tendon induction medium. The results showed that AFs expressed significantly higher levels in the early stage of α-SMA (Fig. 2A, day 0, 1.23-fold, p<0.05), Myog (Fig. 2A, day 0, 3.65-fold, p<0.01), OCN (Fig. 2B, day 0, 16.6-fold, p<0.01), MSX2 (Fig. 2B, day 0, 1.53-fold, p<0.05), and BMP4 (Fig. 2B) and OPN (Fig. 2B). In the later stage, AFs expressed significantly lower levels of α-SMA (Fig. 2A, day 3, 1.48-fold, p<0.05; day 7, 1.70-fold, p<0.01; day 14, 3.67-fold, p<0.01), Myog (Fig. 2A, day 3, 4.35-fold, p<0.01; day 14, 1.57-fold, p<0.05), and higher levels of MSX2 (Fig. 2B, day 3, 2.96-fold, p<0.05; day 7, 4.80-fold, p<0.05; day 14, 8.12-fold, p<0.01).

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2.

RT-PCR results of AFs and FFs in vitro cultured in medium with ascorbic acid (n=3). RT-PCR analysis of α-SMA, Myog (A), OCN, MSX2, BMP4, OPN (B), CD44 and IL-6 (C), TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 (D) were conducted. The results of the target gene expression were normalized to the housekeeping gene, GAPDH. *Significant differences between two groups (day 0 for α-SMA, MSX2, CD44, TGF-β1, and TGF-β3; day 3 for α-SMA, MSX2, and CD44; day 7 for MSX2; and day 14 for Myog) (p<0.05). **Highly significant differences between two groups (day 0 for Myog and OCN; day 3 for Myog, IL-6, and TGF-β3; day 7 for α-SMA; and day 14 for α-SMA and MSX2) (p<0.01). Bar (A): 100 μm. α-SMA, alpha-smooth muscle actin; Myog, myogenin; OCN, osteocalcin; MSX2, msh-like 2; BMP4, bone morphogenetic protein 4; OPN, osteopontin; CD44, acidic sulfated integral membrane glycoproteins; IL-6, interleukin-6; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor beta1; TGF-β2, transforming growth factor beta2; TGF-β3, transforming growth factor beta3; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

Proliferation and migration capacity of FFs compared to AFs in vitro

Proliferation capacity were determined on day 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 cultured in normal medium, and the result showed higher proliferation capacity of FFs (Supplementary Fig. S2A; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea). Wound closure was photographed on 0, 8, 24, and 48 h to show migration capacity; the migration distance showed similar migration capacity between FFs and AFs (Supplementary Fig. S3A–B).

Lower expression levels of inflammatory factors and TGF-β family of cytokines in FFs compared with AFs in vitro

RT-PCR was employed to evaluate the gene expression levels of inflammatory factors and the TGF-β family of cytokines by FFs and AFs on day 0, 3, 7, and 14 in scaffold-free tendon induction medium. The results showed that AFs expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 (Fig. 2D, day 3, 9.44-fold, p<0.05), TGF-β3 (Fig. 2D, day 0, 2.16-fold, p<0.05; day 3, 3.50-fold, p<0.01), and relatively higher expression of TGF-β2 (Fig. 2D), compared with FFs. AFs also expressed significantly higher levels of inflammatory factors, such as CD44 (Fig. 2C, day 0, 4.68-fold, p<0.05; day 3, 17.41-fold, p<0.05) and IL-6 (Fig. 2C, day 3, 3.80-fold, p<0.01) compared with FFs. Lower expression levels of the TGF-β family of cytokines and inflammatory factors by FFs may result in less spontaneous osteogenic differentiation capacity of FFs, compared with AFs.

FFs reduced ectopic ossification with better Achillies tendon regeneration in vivo

X-ray imaging was used to determine the ossification level in each group. The results showed that the AFs transplant group displayed significantly higher levels of spontaneous ossification (Fig. 3A first row, arrows showed the ectopic bone formed during regeneration) compared with the FFs group (Fig. 3A second row, arrows showed the ectopic bone formed during regeneration) (7/7 vs. 2/7, M–W test p<0.01). We also calculated the area and density of ectopic bone formed, and found that the AFs group displayed significantly larger area (Fig. 3B, M–W test: p<0.05), higher mean density, and max density (Fig. 3B, M–W test, p<0.05) of ectopic bone compared with the FFs group. The results thus indicated that utilizing FFs as seed cells had significantly lower potential to induce ectopic bone formation compared with AFs.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

X-ray images of repaired tendons of mice 14 weeks post-transplantation and evaluation of ossification extent (n=7). (A) X-ray images showed ossification ratio of 7/7 in AFs group (first row), 2/7 in FFs group (second row) (arrow showed the ectopic bone inside repaired tendon). (B) The distribution and medians of area, mean density, max density, and sum density of ectopic bone in AFs group (rhombus) and FFs group (square). The differences between two groups were determined by Mann–Whitney test. The lines indicate the medians.*Significant differences between two groups [area, density (mean), density (max), p<0.05]. **Highly significant differences between two groups (Ossification ratio, p<0.01). Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

Bone histological scoring showed significantly lower score in the FFs group at 14 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 4F, 1.00 vs. 8.25, p<0.05), both groups scored 0 at 6 weeks (not shown). Safranin O stain scoring showed significantly lower score of the FFs group at 6 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 4C, 4.56 vs. 7.06, p<0.05), with less chondrocytes being present in the repaired tendon of the FFs group. The density of Safranin O staining showed significantly lower density of FFs group (Fig. 4D, 0.77 vs. 1.00, p<0.05), which correspond to scoring results. General histological scoring showed significantly lower score of the FFs group at 6 weeks post-transplantation (Fig. 4E, 7.53 vs. 10.56, p<0.05), with better histological structure of the repaired tendon being observed in the FFs group.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4.

Morphology and production of cartilage matrix of cells inside repaired tendon of AFs and FFs group at 6 weeks (n=3) and 14 weeks (n=3) post-transplantation. (A, B) Typical H&E staining, Safranin O (SO) staining of regenerated tendon at 6 and 14 weeks post-transplantation. (C, D) Safranin O staining score and density of regenerated tendon at 6 and 14 weeks post-transplantation were shown. (E) Histological score of regenerated tendon at 6 and 14 weeks post-transplantation. (F) Bone histological score of regenerated tendon at 14 weeks post-transplantation. (G) DiI-dyed cells (arrow) were seen in both repaired tissue and ossification region. Scale bar (A, B): 200 μm of first and third columns, 50 μm of second and fourth columns; scale bar (G): 100 μm. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; DiI, 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′3′-tetramethylindocarbocyanine perchlorate. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

Both H&E staining and Safranin O staining showed that there were consistently more chondrocyte-like (Fig. 4A, yellow arrow) and Safranin O-stained cells (Fig. 4B, yellow arrow) at 6 weeks post-transplantation in the AFs group compared with the FFs group. At 14 weeks post-transplantation, all mice in the AFs group developed ectopic bone, whereas only two out of seven mice in the FFs group had ectopic bone formation (Fig. 3A). Bone marrow was found in the AFs group (Fig. 4A), while only a few chondrocytes were present in the FFs group (Fig. 4A).

These results thus suggested that utilizing FFs as seed cells could reduce ectopic bone formation leading to enhanced tendon regeneration.

Few transplanted cells contributed to ossification in vivo

Six weeks after transplantation, we can track the DiI-dyed transplanted cells by using noninvasive Kodak in vivo FX small animal imaging system (Supplementary Fig. S1) and confocal image. A few implanted cells were KI67 positive; while the majority of implanted cells were KI67 negative; these results indicated that a few of implanted cells are proliferative (Supplementary Fig. S2B). Under confocal laser scanning microscope, we observed that the majority of implanted cells contribute in neo-tendon (Fig. 4G, second row). We also found that a few of implanted cells differentiated into osteo/chondrocytic-like cells in ossification region (Fig. 4G, first row, arrows showed DiI-positive osteo/chondrocytic-like cells). These were found in some samples (three of four specimens in AFs group and two of four specimens in FFs group). These results indicated that the majority of transplanted cells contribute to tendon repair and cause ossification by paracrine, while few of them may differentiate into osteo/chondrocytes and contribute ossification.

FFs had lower expression levels of inflammatory factors and TGF-β family of cytokines in vivo

RT-PCR was utilized to analyze the expression of inflammatory factors and the TGF-β family of cytokines within the repaired tendon at 2, 4, 6, and 14 weeks post-transplantation. The results showed that AFs expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 (Fig. 5A, week 2, 6.38-fold, p<0.05; week 4, 30.90-fold, p<0.05), TGF-β2 (Fig. 5A, week 4, 10.78-fold, p<0.05), and TGF-β3 (Fig. 5A, week 2, 3.23-fold, p<0.05; week 4, 10.81-fold, p<0.05) compared with FFs. AFs also displayed significantly higher expression levels of inflammatory factors, such as CD44 (Fig. 5B, week 2, 1.63-fold, p<0.05) and IL-6 (Fig. 5B, week 2, 6.14-fold) compared with FFs.

FIG. 5.

FIG. 5.

FFs expressed lower TGF-β and inflammatory factors in vivo 2, 4, 6, and 14 weeks after transplantation (n=3). (A, B) RT-PCR analysis of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, CD44, and IL-6 were shown. The results of the target gene expression were normalized to the housekeeping gene, GAPDH. The results showed that AFs expressed significantly higher levels of TGF-β1 (A, week 2, 6.38-fold, p<0.05; week 4, 30.90-fold, p<0.05), TGF-β2 (A, week 4, 10.78-fold, p<0.05), TGF-β3 (A, week 2, 3.23-fold, p<0.05; week 4, 10.81-fold, p<0.05), CD44 (B, week 2, 1.63-fold, p<0.05), and IL-6 (B, week 2, 6.14-fold) compared to FFs. *Significant differences between two groups (p<0.05). CD44, acidic sulfated integral membrane glycoproteins; IL-6, interleukin-6. Color images available online at www.liebertpub.com/tea

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the age of donor cells on spontaneous ectopic ossification in tendon repair and its underlying mechanism. It was found that (i) there was significantly lower probability of ectopic bone formation in FFs treated tendon, and less chondrocytes and bone marrow formation compared with AFs-treated tendon; (ii) FFs had less osteogenic differentiation potential both in vitro and in vivo; (iii) FFs had significantly lower expression levels of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3 both in vitro and in vivo, and significantly lower levels of inflammatory factors in vitro, such as CD44 and IL-6.

Osteogenic potential of AFs and FFs may be due to presence of dermal stem cell subpopulation. Dermal stem cells derived from mammalian skin demonstrated osteogenic potential in vitro with expression of OCN and apparent formation of osteogenic nodules.34 An in vivo animal study showed type I collagen expression 4 weeks after dermal stem cells were injected into the backs of immunodeficient NOD-SCID mice,34 which indicated that dermal stem cells possessed the potential for bone formation in vivo. In another study, stem cells isolated from adult dermis were utilized as seed cells for cartilage tissue engineering.35 These studies suggested that there exists a cellular subpopulation within mammalian dermis that can be considered to be bona fide stem cells, which has the potential to differentiate into mesenchymal lineages. In our study, we also found that the heterogeneous cells derived from skin may contain subpopulations of stem cells, which may differentiate into tenocyte and osteogenic lineages. Moreover, lower expression of osteogenic genes of FFs cell sheet may be the reason of lower ossification during tendon repair. While higher expression of α-SMA and Myog of FFs cell sheet indicated higher capacity of FFs to differentiate into myofibroblasts, which may promote the regeneration of connective tissues36 including tendon. These endogenous differences between AFs and FFs may contribute to tendon regeneration potential and ectopic ossification risk.

Osteogenic differentiation in vitro and ossification in vivo are closely associated with the expression of the TGF-β family and BMP family of cytokines. Growth factors play an important role in mediating cell fate decisions. TGF-β could induce differentiation of fibroblasts during tissue repair.37,38 However, as TGF-β is crucial during fibrosis,39,40 scarring,41 and inducing chondrogenesis of fibroblasts,42 which also decrease tendon repair, the proper expression level of TGF-β may be essential for tendon regeneration. TGF-β signaling is specifically required for cell proliferation in Meckel's cartilage and the mandibular anlagen, and for the formation of the coronoid condyle and angular processes.43 After chondrogenic differentiation, some cells will undergo terminal differentiation into osteoblasts, in the absence of inhibitors, such as basic fibroblast growth factors or parathyroid hormone-like peptide.44 A previous study showed that TGF-β3 could enhance chondrogenesis,45 and calcification occurred upon subcutaneous implantation into nude mice for 8 weeks.46 Chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) was demonstrated to occur in the presence of TGF-β3 with expression of Collagen type I, Collagen type II, and Collagen type X.44 Further, TGF-β3 could also directly induce hypertrophy and osteogenesis of MSCs.47 TGF-β1 also had similar potential to induce chondrogenic differentiation and hypertrophy of hMSCs.47,48 TGF-β2 is known to be necessary for mandibular development because without TGF-β2, severe defects in mandibular development occurred.43 BMP family also showed great osteoinductive potential.49–51 These results thus suggested that the presence of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, or BMP might cause spontaneous calcification.

In this study, we cultured AFs and FFs in high cell density with multilayer and in high glucose DMEM with 10% FBS and 50 μg/mL of ascorbic acid as described in previous work.27,52 We analyzed the mRNA during the formation of scaffold-free engineered tendon and found that mRNA expression of TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3, BMP4, and some inflammatory cytokines were significantly increased up to day 14 in AFs compared with FFs. The mechanisms responsible for the upregulation of these genes may be due to intrinsic trait of AFs in response to environment. The in vitro study showed that transcriptional factor—runx2, an essential transcription factor that governs osteoblastic differentiation,53 was significantly more highly expressed in the protein level in the AFs group compared with the FFs group. As reported, runx2 respond to TGF-β and BMP family.54,55 Hence, it is possible that the obvious chondrocytes morphology observed at 6 weeks post-transplantation and formation of bone marrow-like cavity at 14 weeks post-transplantation in the AFs group may be due to high expression levels of TGF-β and BMP during the early stages of tendon repair.

FFs are superior to AFs for tendon repair due to lower osteogenic potential and greater capacity for tissue regeneration. Our study demonstrated lower osteogenic potential in vitro and significantly lesser ossification (2/7 in the FFs group compared to 7/7 in the AFs group) upon in vivo transplantation. Further, we noticed that the expression levels of inflammatory factors in FFs cultured in vitro was significantly lower compared with AFs. During fetal tendon regeneration, lower expression levels of CD44 indicated superior material properties and reduced cross-sectional area, resulting in better healing parameters compared with adult tendon injury.56 During scarless human fetal wound repair, diminished IL-6 expression play an important role in regeneration.57 Other studies also demonstrated the great potential of fetal dermal cells to regenerate extracellular matrix similar to original tissue.58,59 In our study, we found that FFs expressed lower levels of IL-6, which made them preferred seed cells in tendon tissue engineering. Collectively, our results indicated that fetal cells were more suitable than adult cells for tendon repair, due to lower risk of ossification and greater potential for scarless wound healing.

The limitation of this study is that the detailed signaling pathway by which ossification is mediated by the TGF-β superfamily of cytokines was not determined. As previously reported, the induction of the signaling pathway by TGF-β leads to phosphorylation of smad2 and smad3.60 The Mad homology 1 and Mad homology 2 (MH1 and MH2) domains of smad3 are known to interact with runx transcription factors,60 which are key targets of the TGF-β superfamily.55 Runx2 is an essential transcription factor that governs osteoblastic differentiation.53 Hence, we hypothesize that TGF-β signaling was transduced by smad2/3 to activate runx2 to initiate ossification. The mechanism of ectopic bone formation by cell-treated tendon will be explored in our future studies.

In conclusion, our study suggested that fetal-derived cells are more appropriate seed cells for tendon tissue engineering due to lower risk of ossification and greater potential for scarless regeneration. This may be due to decreased expression of inflammatory factors by fetal cells compared with adult cells. Significantly higher expression of TGF-β1 and TGF-β3 by AFs suggested a relationship between ectopic bone formation and the TGF-β family of cytokines in cell transplantation therapy for tendon repair.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig2.pdf (96.4KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig3.pdf (89KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (43.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSFC grants (81330041, 81125014, 31271041, 81071461, 81201396, 31000440, J1103603, and 1073032), The National Key Scientific Program (2012CB966604), the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2012AA020503), Regenerative Medicine in Innovative Medical Subjects of Zhejiang Province and Zhejiang Provincial Program for the Cultivation of High-level Innovative Health Talents, Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan of the Department of Health of Zhejiang Province (2013RCA010). The authors thank Ping Lu for assistance in article preparation and Linzhao Xiao Nan for the confocal imaging.

Disclosure Statement

No competing financial interests exist.

References

  • 1.Wang J.H.Mechanobiology of tendon. J Biomech 39,1563, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wisbeck J.M., Parks B.G., and Schon L.C.Xenograft scaffold full-wrap reinforcement of krackow achilles tendon repair. Orthopedics 35,e331, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Phipatanakul W.P., and Petersen S.A.Porcine small intestine submucosa xenograft augmentation in repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38,572, 2009 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lykoudis E.G., Contodimos G.V., Ristanis S., Georgoulis A.D., and Lazarou S.A.One-stage complex Achilles tendon defect reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft and a gracilis free flap. Foot Ankle Int 31,634, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Xie R.G., and Tang J.B.Allograft tendon for second-stage tendon reconstruction. Hand Clin 28,503, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Noh J.H., Roh Y.H., Lee K., and Lee J.S.Achilles tendon allograft with its bony attachment to repair rupture and extensive degeneration of the heel cord. Acta Orthop Belg 78,678, 2012 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Conti S.F., and Wong Y.S.Osteolysis of structural autograft after calcaneocuboid distraction arthrodesis for stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Foot Ankle Int 23,521, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Morrell N.T., Mercer D.M., and Moneim M.S.Late reconstruction of chronic distal biceps tendon ruptures using fascia lata autograft and suture anchor fixation. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 16,141, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.McCoy B.W., and Haddad S.L.The strength of achilles tendon repair: a comparison of three suture techniques in human cadaver tendons. Foot Ankle Int 31,701, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Peltz T.S., Haddad R., Scougall P.J., Gianoutsos M.P., Bertollo N., and Walsh W.R.Performance of a knotless four-strand flexor tendon repair with a unidirectional barbed suture device: a dynamic ex vivo comparison. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 39,30, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Al-Qattan M.M.K-wire fixation for extraarticular transverse/short oblique fractures of the shaft of the middle phalanx associated with extensor tendon injury. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 33,561, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fanter N.J., Davis E.W., and Baker C.J.Fixation of the Achilles tendon insertion using suture button technology. Am J Sports Med 40,2085, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Awad H.A., Butler D.L., Boivin G.P., Smith F.N., Malaviya P., Huibregtse B., and Caplan A.I.Autologous mesenchymal stem cell-mediated repair of tendon. Tissue Eng 5,267, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ahmad Z., Wardale J., Brooks R., Henson F., Noorani A., and Rushton N.Exploring the application of stem cells in tendon repair and regeneration. Arthroscopy 28,1018, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Deng D., Liu W., Xu F., Yang Y., Zhou G., Zhang W.J., Cui L., and Cao Y.Engineering human neo-tendon tissue in vitro with human dermal fibroblasts under static mechanical strain. Biomaterials 30,6724, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu W., Chen B., Deng D., Xu F., Cui L., and Cao Y.Repair of tendon defect with dermal fibroblast engineered tendon in a porcine model. Tissue Eng 12,775, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zaulyanov L., and Kirsner R.S.A review of a bi-layered living cell treatment (Apligraf ) in the treatment of venous leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers. Clin Interv Aging 2,93, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brink H.E., Bernstein J., and Nicoll S.B.Fetal dermal fibroblasts exhibit enhanced growth and collagen production in two- and three-dimensional culture in comparison to adult fibroblasts. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 3,623, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pouyani T., Papp S., and Schaffer L.Tissue-engineered fetal dermal matrices. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 48,493, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Longaker M.T., Whitby D.J., Ferguson M.W., Lorenz H.P., Harrison M.R., and Adzick N.S.Adult skin wounds in the fetal environment heal with scar formation. Ann Surg 219,65, 1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sandulache V.C., Parekh A., Dohar J.E., and Hebda P.A.Fetal dermal fibroblasts retain a hyperactive migratory and contractile phenotype under 2-and 3-dimensional constraints compared to normal adult fibroblasts. Tissue Eng 13,2791, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harris M.T., Butler D.L., Boivin G.P., Florer J.B., Schantz E.J., and Wenstrup R.J.Mesenchymal stem cells used for rabbit tendon repair can form ectopic bone and express alkaline phosphatase activity in constructs. J Orthop Res 22,998, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lin L., Shen Q., Xue T., and Yu C.Heterotopic ossification induced by Achilles tenotomy via endochondral bone formation: expression of bone and cartilage related genes. Bone 46,425, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Takemitsu H., Zhao D., Yamamoto I., Harada Y., Michishita M., and Arai T.Comparison of bone marrow and adipose tissue-derived canine mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Vet Res 8,150, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raynaud C.M., Maleki M., Lis R., Ahmed B., Al-Azwani I., Malek J., Safadi F.F., and Rafii A.Comprehensive characterization of mesenchymal stem cells from human placenta and fetal membrane and their response to osteoactivin stimulation. Stem Cells Int 2012,658356, 2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Awad H.A., Boivin G.P., Dressler M.R., Smith F.N., Young R.G., and Butler D.L.Repair of patellar tendon injuries using a cell-collagen composite. J Orthop Res 21,420, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ouyang H.W., Cao T., Zou X.H., Heng B.C., Wang L.L., Song X.H., and Huang H.F.Mesenchymal stem cell sheets revitalize nonviable dense grafts: implications for repair of large-bone and tendon defects. Transplantation 82,170, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yin Z., Chen X., Chen J.L., Shen W.L., Hieu N.T., Gao L., and Ouyang H.W.The regulation of tendon stem cell differentiation by the alignment of nanofibers. Biomaterials 31,2163, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lucaciu O., Baciut M., Baciut G., Campian R., Soritau O., Bran S., Crisan B., and Crisan L.Tissue engineered bone versus alloplastic commercial biomaterials in craniofacial reconstruction. Rom J Morphol Embryol 51,129, 2010 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dennis J.E., Konstantakos E.K., Arm D., and Caplan A.I.In vivo osteogenesis assay: a rapid method for quantitative analysis. Biomaterials 19,1323, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grogan S.P., Barbero A., Winkelmann V., Rieser F., Fitzsimmons J.S., O'Driscoll S., Martin I., and Mainil-Varlet P.Visual histological grading system for the evaluation of in vitro-generated neocartilage. Tissue Eng 12,2141, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chen J.M., Willers C., Xu J., Wang A., and Zheng M.H.Autologous tenocyte therapy using porcine-derived bioscaffolds for massive rotator cuff defect in rabbits. Tissue Eng 13,1479, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ivey K.N., Muth A., Arnold J., King F.W., Yeh R.F., Fish J.E., Hsiao E.C., Schwartz R.J., Conklin B.R., Bernstein H.S., and Srivastava D.MicroRNA regulation of cell lineages in mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2,219, 2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yamanishi H., Fujiwara S., and Soma T.Perivascular localization of dermal stem cells in human scalp. Exp Dermatol 21,78, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sanchez-Adams J., and Athanasiou K.A.Dermis isolated adult stem cells for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33,109, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lee C.H., Shah B., Moioli E.K., and Mao J.J.CTGF directs fibroblast differentiation from human mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and defines connective tissue healing in a rodent injury model. J Clin Invest 120,3340, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Adapala R.K., Thoppil R.J., Luther D.J., Paruchuri S., Meszaros J.G., Chilian W.M., and Thodeti C.K.TRPV4 channels mediate cardiac fibroblast differentiation by integrating mechanical and soluble signals. J Mol Cell Cardiol 54,45, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kennard S., Liu H., and Lilly B.Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-1) down-regulates Notch3 in fibroblasts to promote smooth muscle gene expression. J Biol Chem 283,1324, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cutroneo K.R.TGF-beta-induced fibrosis and SMAD signaling: oligo decoys as natural therapeutics for inhibition of tissue fibrosis and scarring. Wound Repair Regen 15(Suppl 1),S54, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Biernacka A., Dobaczewski M., and Frangogiannis N.G.TGF-beta signaling in fibrosis. Growth Factors 29,196, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Smith P., Mosiello G., Deluca L., Ko F., Maggi S., and Robson M.C.TGF-beta2 activates proliferative scar fibroblasts. J Surg Res 82,319, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Park J.S., Yang H.N., Woo D.G., Jeon S.Y., and Park K.H.Multilineage differentiation of human-derived dermal fibroblasts transfected with genes coated on PLGA nanoparticles plus growth factors. Biomaterials 34,582, 2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Oka K., Oka S., Sasaki T., Ito Y., Bringas P.J., Nonaka K., and Chai Y.The role of TGF-beta signaling in regulating chondrogenesis and osteogenesis during mandibular development. Dev Biol 303,391, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Weiss S., Hennig T., Bock R., Steck E., and Richter W.Impact of growth factors and PTHrP on early and late chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. J Cell Physiol 223,84, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mara C.S., Sartori A.R., Duarte A.S., Andrade A.L., Pedro M.A., and Coimbra I.B.Periosteum as a source of mesenchymal stem cells: the effects of TGF-beta3 on chondrogenesis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 66,487, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bian L., Zhai D.Y., Tous E., Rai R., Mauck R.L., and Burdick J.A.Enhanced MSC chondrogenesis following delivery of TGF-beta3 from alginate microspheres within hyaluronic acid hydrogels in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials 32,6425, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mueller M.B., Fischer M., Zellner J., Berner A., Dienstknecht T., Prantl L., Kujat R., Nerlich M., Tuan R.S., and Angele P.Hypertrophy in mesenchymal stem cell chondrogenesis: effect of TGF-beta isoforms and chondrogenic conditioning. Cells Tissues Organs 192,158, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Re'Em T., Kaminer-Israeli Y., Ruvinov E., and Cohen S.Chondrogenesis of hMSC in affinity-bound TGF-beta scaffolds. Biomaterials 33,751, 2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Fan J., Park H., Tan S., and Lee M.Enhanced osteogenesis of adipose derived stem cells with Noggin suppression and delivery of BMP-2. PLoS One 8,e72474, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Huo L., Liu K., Pei J., Yang Y., Ye Y., Liu Y., Sun J., Han H., Xu W., and Gao Y.Flouride promotes viability and differentiation of osteoblast-like Saos-2 cells via BMP/Smads signaling pathway. Biol Trace Elem Res 155,142, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shen Q., Zhu S., Hu J., Geng N., and Zou S.Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4)-stimulated cell differentiation and bone formation within the expanding calvarial suture in rats. J Craniofac Surg 20,1561, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen X., Song X.H., Yin Z., Zou X.H., Wang L.L., Hu H., Cao T., Zheng M., and Ouyang H.W.Stepwise differentiation of human embryonic stem cells promotes tendon regeneration by secreting fetal tendon matrix and differentiation factors. Stem Cells 27,1276, 2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ge W., Shi L., Zhou Y., Liu Y., Ma G.E., Jiang Y., Xu Y., Zhang X., and Feng H.Inhibition of osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stromal cells by retinoblastoma binding protein 2 repression of RUNX2-activated transcription. Stem Cells 29,1112, 2011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lee K.S., Kim H.J., Li Q.L., Chi X.Z., Ueta C., Komori T., Wozney J.M., Kim E.G., Choi J.Y., Ryoo H.M., and Bae S.C.Runx2 is a common target of transforming growth factor beta1 and bone morphogenetic protein 2, and cooperation between Runx2 and Smad5 induces osteoblast-specific gene expression in the pluripotent mesenchymal precursor cell line C2C12. Mol Cell Biol 20,8783, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ito Y., and Miyazono K.RUNX transcription factors as key targets of TGF-beta superfamily signaling. Curr Opin Genet Dev 13,43, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ansorge H.L., Beredjiklian P.K., and Soslowsky L.J.CD44 deficiency improves healing tendon mechanics and increases matrix and cytokine expression in a mouse patellar tendon injury model. J Orthop Res 27,1386, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Liechty K.W., Adzick N.S., and Crombleholme T.M.Diminished interleukin 6 (IL-6) production during scarless human fetal wound repair. Cytokine 12,671, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Larson B.J., Longaker M.T., and Lorenz H.P.Scarless fetal wound healing: a basic science review. Plast Reconstr Surg 126,1172, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Beanes S.R., Hu F.Y., Soo C., Dang C.M., Urata M., Ting K., Atkinson J.B., Benhaim P., Hedrick M.H., and Lorenz H.P.Confocal microscopic analysis of scarless repair in the fetal rat: defining the transition. Plast Reconstr Surg 109,160, 2002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ross S., and Hill C.S.How the Smads regulate transcription. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 40,383, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental data
Supp_Fig2.pdf (96.4KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig3.pdf (89KB, pdf)
Supplemental data
Supp_Fig1.pdf (43.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Tissue Engineering. Part A are provided here courtesy of Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

RESOURCES