Abstract
Purpose
The minimum slice spacing in multislice imaging is limited by inter-slice crosstalk due to an imperfect slice profile. This study sought to minimize the slice spacing using matched-phase RF pulses and demonstrate its application in cerebral blood flow imaging using velocity-selective arterial spin labeling.
Methods
A spin-echo matched-phase 90°–180° RF pair was designed using Shinnar-Le Roux algorithm in order to improve the slice profile of longitudinal magnetization, which plays a more critical role in creating interslice crosstalk than transverse magnetization. Both transverse and longitudinal slice profiles were compared between matched-phase RF and sinc-based RF pulses in simulations and measurements. Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling was performed in normal volunteers using both RF pulses and standard deviation of cerebral blood flow time series was calculated to examine ASL signal stability.
Results
Using designed matched-phase RF, the longitudinal slice profile was sharpened without signal-to-noise ratio loss. In velocity-selective arterial spin labeling imaging, the temporal standard deviation of cerebral blood flow measurements was reduced from 48 mL/100 g/min to 32 mL/100 g/min by 33% using matched-phase RF pulses, and as a result, cerebral blood flow image quality improved.
Conclusion
This study reports that near-contiguous multislice imaging can be achieved using matched-phase RF pulses without compromising signal-to-noise ratio and signal stability.
Keywords: matched-phase RF, cerebral blood flow, arterial spin labeling, VSASL
Crosstalk between slices in multislice imaging is caused by an imperfect RF slice profile (1–4). No selective RF pulse has a perfectly rectangular profile in practice, and therefore partially excites the adjacent slices in contiguous multislice imaging. Unless a very long TR (>4–5 × T1) is used, the perturbed magnetization in the adjacent slices will not fully recover to its equilibrium value before its own RF excitation. This pre-perturbation introduces errors into quantitative imaging such as measurements of T1 or T2 (5–8), alters the contrast between tissues in qualitative imaging which confounds clinical diagnosis (9–11), and reduces overall signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (12). One simple method to avoid the pre-perturbation is to place a larger gap between slices (4) although this involves a risk of missing lesions in the acquired images. Another simple method is to use a longer TR to allow for a near-full relaxation of the perturbed magnetization. However, a long TR increases total scan time and a shorter TR is required in applications such as T1-weighted imaging. Based on the similar idea of increasing time for relaxation, the order of slice acquisition can be interleaved (2,3,13,14), but the time for relaxation still may not be long enough to achieve full relaxation when a short TR is used. While crosstalk may be significantly reduced in gradient echo sequences using these methods, it is a more severe problem in spin-echo sequences because the profile of the 180° refocusing RF pulse or the 90°–180° combination is worse than that of the 90° RF pulse alone due to the peak RF limits. Spin-echo imaging is beneficial in many applications for its advantage of reducing susceptibility artifacts both those arising from anatomy (temporal/frontal regions) and from pathology/foreign bodies (blood products, clips, etc).
The typical goal of RF pulse design is to produce a sharp pulse profile in a minimum amount of time. The tradeoff is limited by the time-bandwidth (TBW) product, specific absorption rate, and peak B1 of the RF pulse. In spin-echo imaging, matched-phase pulses can be used to improve RF excitation performance (15). Unlike conventional RF pulses, the individual 90° and 180° pulses in matched-phase RF pulses can have non-linear phase. However, these phases are designed to be matched to each other such that a linear phase is obtained at the end of the pulse pair. This creates more flexibility in RF pulse design, which can be utilized to sharpen the slice profile (or increase TBW product), reduce the echo time (TE), or lower peak B1 for a given pulse duration.
In addition to improving transverse slice profile, we demonstrate that the profile of longitudinal magnetization can be sharpened using matched-phase RF pulses, and therefore inter-slice crosstalk is minimized. We simulate and measure slice profiles using the matched-phase RF and sinc-based RF pulses and show that matched-phase RF pulses achieve a sharper longitudinal slice profile than sinc-based RF pulses, allowing for a smaller slice spacing. We then apply matched-phase RF pulses to cerebral blood flow (CBF) measurements using velocity-selective arterial spin labeling (VSASL) (16). Because of the typical brain motion during image acquisition, higher interslice crosstalk increases a temporal variation in the ASL signal, leading to reduced ASL signal stability. We demonstrate that near-contiguous multislice imaging can be achieved using matched-phase RF pulses in ASL perfusion imaging without reducing stability of ASL signal.
METHODS
Pulse Design
Matched-phase RF pulses were designed using the Shinnar– Le Roux (SLR) algorithm (17). In the SLR algorithm, an RF pulse is represented by two complex polynomials α and β. The transverse component of magnetization after the 90° excitation is
[1] |
The transverse magnetization after the 180° refocusing pulse following the 90° excitation pulse is then given by
[2] |
Because the term α90 has very little phase across the slice, most of the phase in Mxy,180 arises from . A simple solution to make this term have a linear phase would be
[3] |
as described in Ref. 15. Note that the scalar is added to satisfy the equations, |β90| = sin(90°/2) and |β180| = sin(180°/2) in the passband. The polynomial β180 was designed by beginning with a minimum phase RF. The 180° RF pulse design is then reduced to finite impulse response filter design using this initial β180. With N time points in the 180° RF pulse, there are N-1 zeros in the polynomial β180, mostly residing along the unit circle in the complex plane. The passband zeros were determined such that the distance from the unit circle was larger than a threshold, 0.005. The number of these passband zeros, M, is approximately same as the TBW product of the pulse, which corresponds to the number of zero-crossing of the RF pulse. Flipping (or taking a conjugate reciprocal of) any of the zeros of a β polynomial only scales the magnitude profile by a factor of one over magnitude of the corresponding zero but does not change the overall shape of magnitude profile (17,18). With the scalar compensation, we flipped the different zeros in the polynomial β180 to generate 2M of all possible combinations of flipped and nonflipped passband zeros. For each case, we regenerated β180 from the combination of the new zeros and derived β180 from β180 using Eq. [3]. Furthermore, we truncated the right side of the 90° RF pulse by 25% without much signal loss, to avoid increasing TE. We then empirically determined the TE of a spin echo that produced a refocused phase across the slice. Once TE was found for one combination, it was the same for all other combinations. Note that, during zero-flipping, the magnitude of β180 is preserved but the phase of β180 is changed; however, the phase of β180 is matched to the phase of β180 in all cases such that a linear phase at the spin-echo is achieved. Among all combinations, we chose the one that obtained close-to-minimum peak B1 with good slice profile. We repeated the whole design process several times with a different initial pulse duration for 180° RF until the resulting peak B1 matched the target RF limit. The whole design steps are summarized in Figure 1, and the designed matched-phase 90°–180° pulse pair is shown in Figure 2.
Slice Profile Simulations
We generated slice profiles in simulation using our matched-phase RF as well as conventional RF pulses based on sinc or SLR design for comparison. While the duration of the 90° and the 180° pulse was both 3.2 ms in the conventional RF pulses, it was 6.4 ms for the 90° RF and 4.3 ms for the 180° RF in the matched-phase RF pulses. Nevertheless, there was only 2.5 ms of difference in the minimum time from start of RF pulse to spin-echo formation because, with the matched-phase RF pulse, (1) the conventional rephasing gradient on the slice selection direction after the 90° RF was not required and (2) the empirically found TE was shorter than twice the time between centers of 90° and 180° RF pulses. The nominal slice thickness for 90° RF was 6 mm in both matched-phase and conventional RF pulses. The nominal slab thickness for 180° RF was the same as 90° excitation thickness in the matched-phase RF. For conventional RF pulses, however, a slab thickness larger than the 90° excitation thickness is preferred for the 180° RF because, in the profile of 180° RF, the plateau is much smaller than the prescribed slice thickness and therefore the refocusing is fully achieved only for the magnetization within this narrow range of the slice. A smaller 180° RF slab thickness will lead to lower SNR whereas a larger 180° RF slab thickness will create more perturbation of magnetization in the neighboring slices, leading to lowered initial magnetization for those slices. For fair comparison, the 180° RF slab thickness in conventional RF pulses was optimized in this study as follows. We performed multislice imaging in a phantom using sinc RF pulses with 6-mm slice thickness and 2-mm slice spacing and measured the average signal intensity in each slice while varying the refocusing slab thickness. As shown in Figure 3a, the average signals in all slices except for the first slice was maximized when the refocusing slab thickness was 1.6 times larger than the imaging slice thickness, and we used this ratio for the subsequent simulations and measurements. With this ratio, sinc-based RF pulses achieve rather consistent signal intensity across slices compared to larger ratios but obtain lower average signal intensity than matched-phase RF (Fig. 3b). The TBW product was eight for the 90° RF and four for the 180° RF in conventional pulses. The TBW product was eight for both 90° RF and 180° RF in matched-phase pulses. We also simulated the slice profiles in the presence of B0 and B1 inhomogeneity.
Slice Profile Measurements
Slice profiles were measured in a phantom using matched-phase and sinc-based RF pulses. A cylindrical phantom was used with the long axis as a slice-selection direction. For each RF pulse type, slice profiles of both Mxy and Mz were measured. Mxy profile was measured by swapping the gradients of readout direction and slice-selection direction during image readout. Mz profile was measured by adding another RF excitation after the RF excitation to examine, with slice-selection directions perpendicular to each other. All slice profiles were normalized by nonselective profiles.
VSASL Perfusion Imaging
To evaluate the RF performance in a clinical application, matched-phase RF pulses were incorporated into CBF measurement sequence using VSASL. Thirty pairs of tagged/control images were acquired for signal averaging. The standard deviation (SD) of the CBF time series was calculated to estimate ASL signal stability (16). Scans were performed using matched-phase RF as well as sinc-based RF pulses for comparison. Two slice-thickness/ slice-spacing configurations were used; 6-mm slice thickness with 6-mm slice spacing (6-skip-6) and 6-mm slice thickness with 2-mm slice spacing (6-skip- 2). For sinc-based RF pulses, we used the slice thickness ratio of 1.6 with 6-skip-2, but used ratio of two with 6-skip-6 for higher SNR. This experiment was performed in five normal volunteers. Although demonstrated using VSASL imaging, matched-phased RF design can be used in ASL imaging with any other tagging schemes.
Experimental Setup
In all phantom and in vivo experiments, the imaging sequence was a 2D single-shot spiral spin-echo acquisition with TE = 16 ms, readout bandwidth = 125 kHz, 64 × 64 matrix size, FOV = 220 cm, and 6-mm slice thickness. For VSASL scans, the velocity-selective tagging was performed using double hyperbolic secant (sech) inversion pulses with a cut-off velocity of 2 cm/s. Background suppression was achieved using one saturation and two sech inversion pulses placed at 4453, 1623, and 463 ms prior to image acquisition respectively. Other parameters in VSASL scans included TR = 5 s and TI = 1630 ms. All experiments were performed on a GE MR750 3.0 T scanner (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) with gradients supporting 50 mT/m amplitude and 200 mT/m/ms slew rate. The body coil and a standard eight-channel head coil were used for RF transmission and signal reception, respectively. All subjects provided informed consent in accordance with institutional policy.
RESULTS
Slice Profile Simulation
Figure 4a shows the slice profile with RF pulses designed using a sinc waveform. It can be seen that perturbation of magnetization in the neighboring slice arises primarily from longitudinal component (Mz) rather than transverse component (Mxy). Figure 4b shows the slice profile with RF pulses designed using SLR algorithm on 90° RF and 180° RF separately. SLR-designed RF pulses sharpen the Mxy profile, which depends mostly on 90° RF, but lead to similar or slightly worse Mz profile than sinc RF because the gain from the use of SLR design in 180° RF may be limited compared to 90° RF. The slice profile with matched-phase RF shown in Figure 4c illustrates that Mxy slice profile is as sharp as SLR RF pulses, but more importantly, Mz profile is improved such that the perturbation to the neighboring slices can be significantly reduced. Figure 5 shows the slice profiles of Mxy simulated in the presence of off-resonance of °100–100 Hz and B1 inhomogeneity with a scaling range of 0.8–1.2. The slice profiles were degraded by off-resonance or B1 variation but there was no significant difference between matched-phase RF and sinc RF pulses.
Slice Profile Measurements
Figure 6 demonstrates the slice profiles measured using matched-phase RF and sinc-based RF pulses. Nominal slice thickness of 30 mm was used for both RF pulses, to better depict the profile without the need to increase the resolution of the spiral. The full width at half maximum of the measured Mxy profile was 29.7 mm with the matched-phase RF and 28.1 mm with the sinc-based RF. Mxy profile was slightly sharper with matched-phase RF than sinc-based RF pulse as expected from profile simulation but there was a small dip observed in the middle of profile with matched-phase RF. On the other hand, Mz profile indicates that the sinc-based RF pulse generates a much larger perturbation of magnetization beyond the prescribed slice thickness compared to matched-phase RF. The full width at half maximum of Mz profile was 26.9 mm with the matched-phase RF and 43.6 mm with the sinc-based RF.
VSASL Perfusion Imaging
The temporal SD of CBF time series for four different combinations of RF types and slice spacing are summarized in Figure 7. When slice spacing was reduced from 6 to 2 mm, the temporal SD in the whole brain increased from 37 ± 11 mL/100 g/min to 48 ± 12 mL/100 g/min using sinc-based RF, but was maintained at 32 ± 6 mL/ 100 g/min using matched-phase RF. For 6-skip-2, mean CBF in the whole brain was 31.4 mL/100 g/min for sincbased RF and 28.9 mL/100 g/min for matched-phase RF, and SNR gain with matched-phase RF was 7.5%, which is consistent with the result from Figure 3b. Figure 8 shows CBF maps and temporal SD maps acquired in a representative healthy volunteer using the 6-skip-2 slice configuration. With sinc-based RF pulses, the temporal SD was higher in the second to sixth slices than the first slice (as expected). With matched-phase RF, however, temporal SD was rather consistent across the slices, showing a similar temporal SD level to that of the first slice with sinc-based RF. As can be predicted from SD maps, CBF maps acquired using sinc-based RF showed erroneous CBF values for a normal volunteer where temporal SD is high.
DISCUSSION
In this study, we demonstrated that matched-phase RF pulses could be used to reduce the crosstalk between imaging slices without SNR loss when using smaller slice spacing that is necessary for near-contiguous multislice acquisition. We showed that the simulated and measured slice profiles had good agreement, and verified that the Mz component of slice profile produced a slice thickness closer to the nominal slice thickness using matched-phase RF than sinc-based RF. A narrow Mz profile with matched-phase RF is expected to reduce the perturbation of magnetization in the adjacent slices. We applied our designed matched-phased RF in VSASL perfusion imaging, and found that the SD of CBF time series was preserved using matched-phase RF when slice spacing was reduced to one third of slice thickness.
The reason that the crosstalk presented here may not be always observed in other applications with spin-echo imaging is that (1) ASL is very sensitive to small changes in the imaging volume and (2) the 180° refocusing slab is often reduced in other sequences to avoid interslice perturbation at the cost of reduced SNR. For example, sincbased RF pulses with the same slab thickness for 90° RF and 180° RF may enable a slice gap as small as 10% of the imaging slice thickness, but SNR loss will be about 25% compared to the case of slab ratio of 1.6 as shown in Figure 3a. Matched-phase RF pulses achieve SNR gain (43% compared to sinc RF with slab ratio of 1) without significant crosstalk in 6-skip-2 slice configuration.
Improvement in Mz profile with matched-phase RF is mostly attributed to the sharp profile of 180° refocusing pulse. Because the small-tip approximation in RF design based on Fourier transform breaks down with a 180° flip-angle, an increase in TBW product of sinc-based 180° RF does not linearly sharpen the slice profile but prolongs the pulse duration. Using SLR algorithm and removing restriction on linearity of the individual 90° and 180° pulse phases, matched-phase RF pulses achieve a sharper slice profile of the 180° pulse with a minimal increase in total pulse duration (2.5 ms in our design).
Matched-phase RF pulses produce slight signal reduction in slices subsequent to the first slice, and with smaller slice spacing, this signal inhomogeneity will increase and may cause non-negligible errors in quantitative imaging. In the example of ASL perfusion imaging, the difference images (with and without tagging) are normalized by MR signal of cerebrospinal fluid for quantification. Because cerebrospinal fluid signal is typically acquired from the middle slices of the same multislice configuration, the normalization process can compensate for the effect of signal reduction except for a few initial slices. In many applications as well as ASL, it may be desirable to at least maintain consistent signal attenuation across all slices. To this end, two or three extra slices next to the first slice may be excited with the same slice spacing immediately before the first slice imaging, and without data readout. Because, in ASL imaging, these extra imaging pulses can be placed in an inflow time of tagged blood, there will be no increase in total scan time due to the extra-slice imaging.
One limitation of the matched-phase RF pulses is that this RF design can only be applied to spin-echo sequences with a single echo but not with multiple echoes as in fast spin-echo (FSE) sequences. 90°–180° matched-phase RF pulses for a linear phase spin-echo are not suited for FSE sequences for two reasons. First, unlike spin-echo, FSE sequences must satisfy the Carr Purcell Meiboom Gil condition where the phases of the 90° excitation pulse and the subsequent refocusing RF pulses are offset by 90° with respect to each other (19,20). Our matched-phase pulses do not satisfy this condition because the 90° excitation has arbitrary phase that is compensated by the refocusing pulse, which essentially has half the phase variation of the 90° excitation. Therefore a constant phase offset is only possible if the excitation profile has a constant phase. Alternatively, a 90°–180° RF pulse pair in FSE was designed previously to deliberately achieve a nonlinear phase spin-echo in an attempt to reduce the dynamic range of signals in 3D imaging (17). Second, even if there was negligible B1 inhomogeneity and the Carr Purcell Meiboom Gil condition was not required, only the odd echoes are usable because the even echoes would have nonlinear phase. One compromised method to incorporate matched-phase RF pulses into FSE would be to employ a series of conventional (linear-phase) 180° RF pulses after our 90°–180° matched-phase RF pulses. Although this approach may achieve some of the advantages of the matched-phase RF pair, especially when reduced flip angles are used, it may not improve the longitudinal slice profile and may not reduce the interslice crosstalk. We would also like to point out that the matched-phase approach is not applicable to sequences that do not incorporate spin echoes (such as spoiled gradient echo or gradient echo EPI). Finally, while we demonstrated the slice profile effects using a spiral readout, we anticipate that there would be similar performance improvement for spin-echo EPI. This is because the matched-phase approach only affects the excitation but not the readout portions of the imaging sequence.
Finally, we suspect that the larger temporal SD of the CBF measurements with VSASL that occur under the poor slice profile condition is because of the typical brain motion during image acquisition. In our measurements using navigators (21), the average velocity of bulk motion along superior-inferior direction is a few mm per second in healthy volunteers. This amount of motion can cause superior-inferior-directional translation on the order of 0.1 mm between each slice excitation. Large signal reduction using conventional RF, coupled with the time-varying slice offset, may be responsible for the increases the temporal SD of CBF.
CONCLUSIONS
We have demonstrated that near-contiguous multislice spin-echo imaging can be achieved by reducing substantial inter-slice crosstalk using matched-phase RF pulse design. We have applied matched-phase RF in VSASL perfusion imaging and shown that stability of ASL signal can be preserved with reduced slice spacing. Based on this, matched-phase RF pulses may have value for many spin-echo imaging applications in which near-contiguous or volumetric coverage is required.
Acknowledgments
Grant sponsor: NIH; Grant number: R01NS066506; Grant sponsor: Lucas foundation, Oak Foundation, and GE Healthcare.
The authors thank Eric C. Wong for providing the initial version of VSASL sequence.
References
- 1.Feinberg DA, Crooks LE, Hoenninger JC, Watts JC, Arakawa M, Chang H, Kaufman L. Contiguous thin multisection MR imaging by two-dimensional Fourier transform techniques. Radiology. 1986;158:811– 817. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.3.3945756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kneeland JB, Shimakawa A, Wehrli FW. Effect of intersection spacing on MR image contrast and study time. Radiology. 1986;158:819–822. doi: 10.1148/radiology.158.3.3945757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Simmons A, Tofts PS, Barker GJ, Arridge SR. Sources of intensity nonuniformity in spin echo images at 1. 5 T. Magn Reson Med. 1994;32:121–128. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910320117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fitzsimmons JR, Googe RE. Multisection-multiecho MR imaging: effect on image quality. Radiology. 1985;157:813–814. doi: 10.1148/radiology.157.3.4059565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Garnier SJ, Bilbro GL, Gault JW, Snyder WE. Magnetic Resonance Image restoration. J Math Imaging Vis. 1995;5:7–19. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Majumdar S, Sostman HD, MacFall JR. Contrast and accuracy of relaxation time measurements in acquired and synthesized multislice magnetic resonance images. Invest Radiology. 1989;24:119–127. doi: 10.1097/00004424-198902000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Just M, Higer HP, Pfannenstiel P. Errors in T1-determination using multislice technique and Gaussian slice profiles. Magn Reson Imaging. 1988;6:53–56. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(88)90523-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Watanabe A, Boesch C, Obata T, Anderson SE. Effect of multislice acquisition on T1 and T2 measurements of articular cartilage at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:109–117. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kucharczyk W, Crawley AP, Kelly WM, Henkelman RM. Effect of multislice interference on image contrast in T2- and T1-weighted MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1988;9:443–451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schwaighofer BW, Yu KK, Mattrey RF. Diagnostic significance of interslice gap and imaging volume in body MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;153:629–632. doi: 10.2214/ajr.153.3.629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mitchell DG, Vinitski S, Burk DL, Jr, Levy D, Rifkin MD. Multiple spin-echo MR imaging of the body: image contrast and motion-induced artifact. Magn Reson Imaging. 1988;6:535–546. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(88)90128-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lomas DJ. Optimization of sequences for MRI of the abdomen and pelvis. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:412–428. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9260(97)80002-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sechtem U, Pflugfelder PW, White RD, Gould RG, Holt W, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB. Cine MR imaging: potential for the evaluation of cardiovascular function. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:239–246. doi: 10.2214/ajr.148.2.239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kasahara S, Miki Y, Mori N, Urayama S, Kanagaki M, Fushimi Y, Maeda C, Sawamoto N, Fukuyama H, Togashi K. Spin-echo T1- weighted imaging of the brain with interleaved acquisition and presaturation pulse at 3 T: a feasibility study before clinical use. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:852–857. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Balchandani P, Yamada M, Pauly J, Yang P, Spielman D. Self-refocused spatial-spectral pulse for positive contrast imaging of cells labeled with SPIO nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med. 2009;62:183–192. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wong EC, Cronin M, Wu WC, Inglis B, Frank LR, Liu TT. Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:1334–1341. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pauly JM, Wong EC. Non-linear phase RF pulses for reduced dynamic range in 3D RARE imaging. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Meeting of ISMRM; Glasgow, Scotland, UK. 2001. p. 688. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pickup S, Ding X. Pulses with fixed magnitude and variable phase response profiles. Magn Reson Med. 1995;33:648–655. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Carr H, Purcell E. Effects of diffusion on free precession in nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. Phys Rev. 1954;94:630–638. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Meiboom S, Gill S. Modified spin-echo method for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev Sci Instr. 1958;29:688–691. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zun Z, Shankaranarayanan A, Zaharchuk G. Pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with prospective motion correction (ASL-PROMO). ISMRM Workshop on Perfusion MRI; Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2012. p. 31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]