Skip to main content
Case Reports in Pathology logoLink to Case Reports in Pathology
. 2014 Jun 18;2014:470340. doi: 10.1155/2014/470340

An Unusual Case of Systemic Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor with Successful Treatment with ALK-Inhibitor

Sanjivini V Jacob 1, John D Reith 1, Angerika Y Kojima 2, William D Williams 3, Chen Liu 1, Lizette Vila Duckworth 1,*
PMCID: PMC4087275  PMID: 25045570

Abstract

Systemic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is an exceedingly rare entity. A 45-year-old Hispanic female presented with a 6-month history of left-sided thigh pain, low back pain, and generalized weakness. PET/CT scan revealed abnormal activity in the liver, adrenal gland, and pancreas. MRI of the abdomen demonstrated two 6-7 cm masses in the liver. MRI of the lumbar spine demonstrated lesions in the L2 to L4 spinous processes, paraspinal muscles, and subcutaneous tissues, as well as an 8 mm enhancing intradural lesion at T11, all thought to be metastatic disease. A biopsy of the liver showed portal tract expansion by a spindle cell proliferation rich in inflammation. Tumor cells showed immunoreactivity for smooth muscle actin and anaplastic lymphoma kinase 1 (ALK1). Tissue from the L5 vertebra showed a process histologically identical to that seen in the liver. FISH analysis of these lesions demonstrated an ALK (2p23) gene rearrangement. The patient was successfully treated with an ALK-inhibitor, Crizotinib, and is now in complete remission. We present the first reported case, to our knowledge, of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with systemic manifestations and ALK translocation. This case is a prime example of how personalized medicine has vastly improved patient care through the use of molecular-targeted therapy.

1. Introduction

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a mesenchymal neoplasm more commonly occurring during the first two decades of life. IMTs can arise in various anatomic locations [16] but occur primarily in the lung [79], orbit, retroperitoneum, or abdominopelvic region [1019]. Lesions may be multifocal. IMT is characterized by a proliferation of myofibroblasts admixed with an inflammatory component of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells. Approximately half of IMTs have a rearrangement of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) locus on chromosome 2p23, leading to aberrant ALK expression [20, 21]. ALK rearrangements are associated with younger presentation and a more indolent behavior [22]. Local recurrence may occur after surgery with a low risk of distant metastases. A small fraction of IMTs behave more aggressively. The management of IMT can be challenging as there are no established medical treatment protocols [1]. We present the first reported case of systemic IMT with ALK gene rearrangement in a 45-year-old female that responded dramatically to an ALK-inhibitor. This case suggests a therapeutic breakthrough for ALK-positive IMTs using an ALK inhibitor.

2. Case Report

A 45-year-old obese Hispanic female, status post cholecystectomy, presented initially with left leg pain, low back pain, generalized weakness, and right-sided blurred vision. Physical examination at that time revealed an abnormal left leg gait and a right lateral strabismus. Laboratory studies revealed mildly elevated liver enzymes (AST 87, ALT 129, total bilirubin 0.9, and alkaline phosphatase 88). Imaging revealed multiple small liver masses and lesions in the lumbar spine. A liver biopsy was performed and was initially interpreted as nonspecific subacute and chronic inflammation with abscess formation. No granulomata, organisms, or evidence of malignancy were seen, and the patient was treated with intravenous antibiotics. Due to high suspicion of tumor in the lumbar region, an exploration of the L3-L4 region was also performed. Operatively, the nerve roots were found to be inflamed in the area, and a proteinaceous cyst was also seen. The patient was subsequently discharged after extensive workup and cultures proved negative.

The patient was readmitted three months after initial discharge due to worsening of low back pain, pain on ambulation, and bilateral lower extremity weakness and numbness, as well as an increase in size of the hepatic and spinal lesions on imaging. Physical exam now showed decreased pinprick, dysesthesias, and weakness with dorsiflexion in the lower extremities bilaterally. Right third cranial nerve palsy was also noted. Repeat MRI of the lumbar spine with and without Gadolinium revealed diffuse enhancing bony lesions involving the L2 to L4 spinous processes, posterior paraspinal muscles, and posterior subcutaneous tissues, and an 8 mm enhancing intradural lesion at T11, all thought to be metastatic disease. MRI of the abdomen with and without Gadolinium demonstrated a poorly defined 6-7 cm mass in the left lobe of the liver and a 6 cm mass in the right lobe of the liver (Figure 1(a)). PET/CT demonstrated abnormal activity in the liver and focal increased activity in the left adrenal gland and head of the pancreas. CA125 was elevated at 88 U/mL (normal range, less than 35 U/mL) but CEA, CA15-3, AFP, and CA19-9 were all within normal range. Serum protein electrophoresis was also performed and was negative for monoclonal gammopathy. The lumbar area was reexplored at that time. Bone and ligamentous material were sent to pathology. A repeat liver biopsy was also performed.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Radiologic appearance of IMT lesions in the liver before (a) and after treatment (b) with ALK-inhibitor. (a) MRI of the abdomen with and without Gadolinium before treatment demonstrates vague poorly defined liver masses in the right and left lobes (arrows) each measuring approximately 6-7 cm. (b) CT of the abdomen obtained at 15-month follow-up demonstrates resolution of the ill-defined liver masses bilaterally following treatment with ALK-inhibitor.

3. Pathologic Findings

Histologic examination of the liver and spine lesions revealed a spindle cell proliferation admixed with an inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells, histiocytes, and eosinophils (Figure 2). The spindle cells were bland in appearance, and no necrosis or atypical mitoses were seen. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that the spindle cells were diffusely immunoreactive for antibodies to smooth muscle actin (SMA), CD68, and exhibited cytoplasmic staining with ALK-1 but were negative for CD117, CD1a, CD23, CD21 (Langerhan cell and dendritic cell markers), EBV, LCA (hematopoetic markers), HepPar1 (hepatocellular marker), CD34, and S-100 protein. A Giemsa stain was also negative. Subsequently, FISH analysis of both the liver and bone lesions showed an ALK (2p23) gene rearrangement (Figure 3). The patient was given a diagnosis of ALK-rearranged systemic inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. She subsequently was treated with the ALK-inhibitor Crizotinib and is currently in complete remission (Figure 1(b)) after 27-month follow-up.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Histologic appearance of IMT lesions in liver and lumbar spine. (a) and (b) Liver tissue with marked inflammatory cells and spindle cell proliferation expanding portal areas and extending into parenchyma. Adjacent normal liver is seen on upper left corner of (a), (H&E), 5x (a) and 20x (b). (c) Spindle cells show strong and diffuse immunoreactivity to SMA, 20x. (d) Spindle cells are immunoreactive for cytoplasmic anaplastic lymphoma kinase protein (ALK-1), 20x. (e) and (f) Lumbar spine is infiltrated by similar mixture of inflammatory and spindled cells expanding the bone marrow, H&E, 5x and 20x.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

FISH analysis using dual color ALK break apart probe of the liver (a) and lumbar lesions (b) showing abnormal ALK (2p23) gene arrangement (translocation). (a) and (b) This is a “break-apart” probe system, where the fused red/green (overlap as yellow) represents the normal ALK gene locus and the separated red and green signals represent an underlying ALK rearrangement (i.e., translocation). Interphase FISH analysis of at least 200 interphase nuclei was performed with a dual color ALK break probe apart set to detect rearrangement of the ALK locus that is commonly associated with anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The break-apart signal pattern (1R1G1F, one red, one green, and one fusion signal) was observed in 11.5% of the analyzed nuclei in the liver (a) and in 12.5% of the analyzed nuclei in the lumbar spine (b). The normal reference is 1.7%, and as such, this represents an abnormal result indicative of ALK gene rearrangement with an unknown chromosomal locus.

4. Discussion

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor is defined by the World Health Organization as a distinctive lesion of myofibroblastic spindle cells with an inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphocytes, eosinophils, and plasma cells [23]. It is a rare entity occurring mostly in children and young adults with a mean age of 10 years at diagnosis. Most cases occur within the first 2 decades of life, with a slight female preponderance. These tumors are more commonly found in the soft tissue and viscera of the lungs, mesentery, and abdominopelvic region but can involve any organ system [119]. The mainstay of treatment for this tumor is complete surgical excision, although local recurrence and spread have been reported, especially when complete resection is not achieved [1, 10, 13, 15, 19, 22, 24, 25]. Several cases have been treated with chemotherapy, radiation, and/or corticosteroids [1, 3, 10, 19, 24]. Systemic or malignant transformation of IMT is rare and has only been reported in a few cases [19, 22, 25].

Pathologic features of IMTs including tumor size, mitotic rate, presence or absence of necrosis, and cellular atypia do not appear to correlate well with clinical outcome. A small subset of IMTs demonstrate histologic progression to malignancy with increased cellularity/pleomorphism of spindled, round, or polygonal cells with vesicular nuclei, high mitotic rate, and atypical mitoses [26]. However, cases lacking these histologic features have been found to behave in an aggressive manner, and conversely cases with worrisome histologic features have been found to behave indolently [22]. In recent years, a highly aggressive intra-abdominal variant of IMT has been described with epithelioid-to-round cell morphology with nuclear membrane or perinuclear ALK staining and predilection for male patients, which has been termed “epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma” to convey the malignant nature of this tumor and close relation to IMT [27].

While the nature of IMT is debated and historically thought to be driven by an inflammatory process [22, 27], Griffin et al. demonstrated a chromosomal aberration associated with these tumors [21]. In their study, they found that half of IMTs contained a breakage in band p22–24 of chromosome 2, with specific involvement of 2p23 leading to ALK overexpression [21]. ALK overexpression is typically detectable by immunohistochemistry, which demonstrates cytoplasmic reactivity in IMT, and is also detectable by FISH. Fusion partners of ALK in IMT include TPM3 and TPM4 [28, 29], CARS [28, 30], clathrin [31], RAN-BP2 [32], ATIC [33], SEC31L1 [34], and PPF1BP1 [8]. ALK rearrangement has been associated with younger age and local recurrence, but not with distant metastasis [22]. In a study by Coffin et al., 59 cases of IMT were studied, of which 6 were found to have distant metastasis [22]. All six cases with distant metastasis were reported to be ALK negative. To our knowledge, our case represents the first reported case of ALK-translocated systemic IMT in a patient presenting with synchronous tumors in the liver and lumbar spine.

Based on a recent study in the New England Journal of Medicine of successful use of ALK-inhibitor in a treating a patient with ALK-positive IMT [24], our patient was treated with the ALK inhibitor Crizotinib with successful resolution of her lesions and symptoms. After 27-month follow-up, the patient remained in complete clinical and radiologic remission.

In summary, this case represents a distinct presentation of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with systemic involvement and ALK gene rearrangement. This case illustrates how personalized medicine through the use of molecular testing has made individual targeted therapy successful.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Gale N, Zidar N, Podboj J, Volavšek M, Luzar B. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of paranasal sinuses with fatal outcome: reactive lesion or tumour? Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2003;56(9):715–717. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.9.715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Koch JA, Dorn P, Rausch T, Ris HB, Lehr HA, Schäfer SC. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the trachea with concomitant granulomatous lymph node lesions. Case Reports in Medicine. 2011;2011:4 pages. doi: 10.1155/2011/151729.151729 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Oliveira Ribeiro AC, Joshi VM, Funkhouser WK, Mukherji SK. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor involving the pterygopalatine fossa. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2001;22(3):518–520. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Binmadi NO, Packman H, Papadimitriou JC, Scheper M. Oral inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: case report and review of literature. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2011;5(1):66–70. doi: 10.2174/1874210601105010066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rao RN, Ranjan P, Singla N, Pandey R. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the urinary bladder diagnosed by anaplastic lymphoma kinase immunostaining. Urology Annals. 2012;4(2):115–118. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.95567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoon SH, Kim K-J, Chung SK, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in the intradural extramedullary space of the lumbar spine with spondylolisthesis: case report and review of the literature. European Spine Journal. 2010;19(supplement 2):S153–S157. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1212-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen C-K, Jan C-I, Tsai J-S, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the lung- a case report. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2010;5(1, article 55) doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-5-55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Takeuchi K, Soda M, Togashi Y, et al. Pulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor expressing a novel fusion, PPFIBP1-ALK: reappraisal of anti-ALK immunohistochemistry as a tool for novel ALK fusion identification. Clinical Cancer Research. 2011;17(10):3341–3348. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bahadori M, Liebow AA. Plasma cell granulomas of the lung. Cancer. 1973;31(1):191–208. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197301)31:1<191::aid-cncr2820310127>3.0.co;2-d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Firat O, Ozturk S, Akalin T, Coker A. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2009;52(3):E60–E61. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Plesec T. Gastrointestinal mesenchymal neoplasms other than gastrointestinal stromal tumors: focusing on their molecular aspects. Pathology Research International. 2011;2011:10 pages. doi: 10.4061/2011/952569.952569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ribeiro MC, Lopes LR, de Souza Neto JC, Meirelles LR, de Carvalho RB, Andreollo NA. Rare gastric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in an adult woman: a case report with review of the literature. Case Reports in Medicine. 2012;2012:4 pages. doi: 10.1155/2012/374070.374070 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pannain VL, Passos JV, da Rocha Filho A, Villela-Nogueira C, Caroli-Bottino A. Agressive inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the liver with underlying schistosomiasis: a case report. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2010;16(33):4233–4236. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kim EY, Lee IK, Lee YS, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor in colon. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society. 2012;82(1):45–49. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Schütte K, Kandulski A, Kuester D, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the pancreatic head: an unusual cause of recurrent acute pancreatitis-case presentation of a palliative approach after failed resection and review of the literature. Case Reports in Gastroenterology. 2010;4(3):443–451. doi: 10.1159/000320953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kye BH, Kim HJ, Kang S-G, Yoo C, Cho H-M. A case of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor originated from the greater omentum in young adult. Journal of the Korean Surgical Society. 2012;82(6):380–384. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.82.6.380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cole B, Zhou H, McAllister N, Afify Z, Coffin CM. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with thrombocytosis and a unique chromosomal translocation with ALK rearrangement. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2006;130(7):1042–1045. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-1042-IMTWTA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sukov WR, Cheville JC, Carlson AW, et al. Utility of ALK-1 protein expression and ALK rearrangements in distinguishing inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor from malignant spindle cell lesions of the urinary bladder. Modern Pathology. 2007;20(5):592–603. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Dishop MK, Warner BW, Dehner LP, et al. Successful treatment of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with malignant transformation by surgical resection and chemotherapy. Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology. 2003;25(2):153–158. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200302000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tothova Z, Wagner AJ. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-directed therapy in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Current Opinion in Oncology. 2012;24(4):409–413. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e328354c155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Griffin CA, Hawkins AL, Dvorak C, Henkle C, Ellingham T, Perlman EJ. Recurrent involvement of 2p23 in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. Cancer Research. 1999;59(12):2776–2780. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher CDM. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histologic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK expression in atypical and aggressive cases. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2007;31(4):509–520. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213393.57322.c7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fletcher CDM, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors. World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Butrynski JE, D’Adamo DR, Hornick JL, et al. Crizotinib in ALK-rearranged inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(18):1727–1733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1007056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zhao H-D, Wu T, Wang J-Q, et al. Primary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor of the breast with rapid recurrence and metastasis: a case report. Oncology Letters. 2012;5(1):97–100. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donner LR, Trompler RA, White RR., IV Progression of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (inflammatory pseudotumor) or soft tissue into sarcoma after several recurrences. Human Pathology. 1996;27(10):1095–1098. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(96)90291-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mariño-Enríquez A, Wang W-L, Roy A, et al. Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma: an aggressive intra-abdominal variant of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with nuclear membrane or perinuclear alk. American Journal of Surgical Pathology. 2011;35(1):135–144. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318200cfd5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Cools J, Wlodarska I, Somers R, et al. Identification of novel fusion partners of ALK, the anaplastic lymphoma kinase, in anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 2002;34(4):354–362. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lawrence B, Perez-Atayde A, Hibbard MK, et al. TPM3-ALK and TPM4-ALK oncogenes in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors. American Journal of Pathology. 2000;157(2):377–384. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64550-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Debelenko LV, Arthur DC, Pack SD, Helman LJ, Schrump DS, Tsokos M. Identification of CARS-ALK fusion in primary and metastatic lesions of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Laboratory Investigation. 2003;83(9):1255–1265. doi: 10.1097/01.lab.0000088856.49388.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Bridge JA, Kanamori M, Ma Z, et al. Fusion of the ALK gene to the clathrin heavy chain gene, CLTC, in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. American Journal of Pathology. 2001;159(2):411–415. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61711-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ma Z, Hill DA, Collins MH, et al. Fusion of ALK to the Ran-binding protein 2 (RANBP2) gene in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 2003;37(1):98–105. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Debiec-Rychter M, Marynen P, Hagemeijer A, Pauwels P. ALK-ATIC fusion in urinary bladder inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 2003;38(2):187–190. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Panagopoulos I, Nilsson T, Domanski HA, et al. Fusion of the SEC31L1 and ALK genes in an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor. International Journal of Cancer. 2006;118(5):1181–1186. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Case Reports in Pathology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES