Skip to main content
World Journal of Gastroenterology logoLink to World Journal of Gastroenterology
. 2006 Nov 28;12(44):7168–7171. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i44.7168

Protective effects of amphetamine on gastric ulcerations induced by indomethacin in rats

Vlaicu Sandor 1,2,3,4, Barbu Cuparencu 1,2,3,4, Dan L Dumitrascu 1,2,3,4, Mircea A Birt 1,2,3,4, Tibor L Krausz 1,2,3,4
PMCID: PMC4087780  PMID: 17131481

Abstract

AIM: To study the effects of amphetamine, an indirect-acting adrenomimetic compound on the indomethacin-induced gastric ulcerations in rats.

METHODS: Male Wistar-Bratislava rats were randomly divided into four groups: Group 1 (control), received an ulcerogenic dose of indomethacin (50 μmol/kg) and Groups 2, 3 and 4, treated with amphetamine (10, 25 and 50 μmol/kg). The drug was administered simultaneously with indomethacin and once again 4 h later. The animals were sacrificed 8 h after indomethacin treatment. The stomachs were opened and the incidence, the number of lesions and their severity were evaluated. The results were expressed as percentage and as mean ± standard error (mean ± SE).

RESULTS: The incidence of ulceration in the control group was 100%. Amphetamine, at doses of 10, 25 and 50 μmol/kg, lowered the incidence to 88.89%, 77.78% and 37.5% respectively. The protection ratio was positive: 24.14%, 55.17% and 80.6% respectively. The total number of ulcerations/rat was 12.44 ± 3.69 in the control group. It decreased to 7.33 ± 1.89, 5.33 ± 2.38 and 2.25 ± 1.97 under the effects of the above-mentioned doses of amphetamine.

CONCLUSION: Amphetamine affords a significant dose-dependent protection against the indomethacin-induced gastric ulcerations in rats. It is suggested that the adrenergic system is involved in the gastric mucosa protection.

Keywords: Amphetamine, Gastric ulceration, Indomethacin, Rats

INTRODUCTION

The involvement of the adrenergic system in some models of gastric ulcerations is well documented[1-4]. Our previous investigations have shown that amphetamine, an indirectly acting sympathomimetic amine has a protective activity on gastric ulcerations induced by reserpine and immobilization in rats[5]. These findings were interpreted as an evidence of a protective activity of the adrenergic mechanisms on the integrity of the gastric mucosa[3,4,6].

Other models of gastric ulcers imply the administration of some nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents such as acetylsalicylic acid[7], phenylbutazone[8] or indomethacin[9]. The genesis of these ulcerations arises from both the local depression of prostanoid biosynthesis[10-12] and a local injury[13]. However, the participation of the adrenergic system in this experimental setting is not excluded[14,15].

In this paper, we studied the effect of amphetamine on the indomethacin-induced gastric ulcerations in albino rats.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and ulcer model

The experiments were carried out on male Wistar albino rats, weighing 144-255 g (from the Animal Center of University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Haţieganu, Cluj-Napoca). The animals were kept in a room with a constant temperature (20-22°C) and humidity, under a natural light-dark regime. They were fed common rat chow and received water ad libitum. The food was withdrawn 12 h prior to administration of the ulcerogenic agent. The rats were randomly divided in four groups.

Control group (Group I) was administered intraperitoneally (ip) with indomethacin 50 μmol/kg. Groups II, III and IV were simultaneously ip injected with indomethacin and amphetamine sulphate, and 4 h later, only with amphetamine. The doses of amphetamine were 10, 25 and 50 μmol/kg , respectively.

During the ulcerogenesis period, the rats were fasted, but water was allowed ad libitum. Eight hours after indomethacin administration, the animals were sacrificed; the stomachs were removed, opened along the curvatura maior and rinsed with saline. They were examined immediately, with a magnifying glass. The following parameters were recorded: the body weight (g), the incidence of ulcerations/group, the total number of ulcerations (TU), the number of large ulcerations (LU) i.e. ulcerations larger than 1 mm and the severity of ulcerations estimated according to a scale between 0 and 4 (ulcer index-UI)[3].

Drugs

Indomethacin: Powder supplied by Terapia SA, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, was suspended in a mixture of 2% methylcellulose and 1% glycerin, ten times diluted with saline. The concentration was 0.025 mol/L (8.945 g/L) and the dose, 50 μmol (17.89 mg)/kg.

Amphetamine sulphate (racemate): It was prepared as an aqueous solution 0.025 mol/L (9.21 g/L) for the dose of 50 μmol (18.425 mg)/kg. Doses of 10 μmol (3.685 mg)/kg and 25 μmol (9.2105 mg)/kg were adapted after dilution. All drugs were ip administered in a volume of 2 mL/kg.

Ethical issues

The study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki’s Declaration on Animal’s Studies and approved by the local ethics committee.

Statistical analysis

All values are expressed as means and standard errors (mean ± SE). The indicators of ulcerogenesis were analyzed initially by a one-way ANOVA test. The significance of differences between groups was observed by the bilateral Student’s t test and by multiple comparison tests of Newman-Keuls and Scheffé. This last test allows comparisons between blocks of groups. These procedures were followed by non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, median’s and Fischer’s exact probability tests[16,17]. The statistical significance of the differences was admitted if P < 0.05.

The protection ratio (PR) was calculated according to the formula:

PR%=(UIcontrol-UItreated)/UIcontrol × 100

Statistical significance for PR was considered for values outside (-) 33% → (+) 33% range[3].

RESULTS

The body weight of the rats was a homogenous parameter, i.e. there were no significant differences between groups (data not included in Tables). The doses of 25 and 50 μmol/kg of amphetamine induced a stereotyped behavior. It was not affected by indomethacin.

Indomethacin induced ulcerations in 100% of the rats. The total number of ulcerations was 12.4 ± 3.69, most of them (10.1 ± 3.74) were larger than 1 mm. The UI was 1.61. When amphetamine was administered, all the parameters diminished in a dose-dependent manner (Tables 1 and 2). In addition, a dose-dependent increase of the PR was found (Table 1).

Table 1.

Effect of amphetamine on incidence and severity of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcerations (%)

Groups TU LU PR
I I50 100 100
II I50 + A10 88.89 77.778 (+) 24.138
III I50 + A25 77.78 66.667 (+) 55.1721
V I50 + A50 37.5a 12.5a (+) 80.6031

The subscript indices represent the doses expressed as μmol/kg.I: Indomethacin; A: Amphetamine; TU: Total number of ulcerations; LU: Large ulcerations (> 1 mm); PR: Protection ratio.

a

P < 0.05 vs groupI(Fischer’s exact probability and median’s test);

1

Significant at PR > (+) 33.33%.

Table 2.

Effect of amphetamine on number and severity of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcerations (mean ± SE)

Groups Number of ulcerations/stomach
Severity
TU LU UI
I (9) I50 12.44 ± 3.69 10.11 ± 3.74 1.61 ± 0.31
II (9) I50 + A10 7.33 ± 1.89 5.44 ± 1.52 1.22 ± 0.25
III (9) I50 + A25 5.33 ± 2.38 3.11 ± 1.9 0.72 ± 0.21a
IV (8) I50 + A50 2.25 ± 1.91c 1.0 ± 1.0c 0.31 ± 0.19b

The subscript indices represent the doses expressed as μmol/kg. I: Indomethacin; A: Amphetamine. TU: Total number of ulcerations; LU: Large ulcerations (> 1 mm); UI: Ulcer index.

a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.01,

c

P < 0.05 vs groupI.

Significant differences between the control group and the groups treated with 25.0 μmol/kg and 50.0 μmol/kg of amphetamine were found in most tests. Some tests showed significant differences between the 10.0 μmol/kg amphetamine administered group and the group that received 50.0 μmol/kg (Tables 1 and 2). For the parameters of ulcerogenesis (TU, LU, and UI), an increase of significance was found in the order: total ulcerations (TU) < ulcerations larger than 1 mm (LU) < ulcer index (UI).

DISCUSSION

These results seem at first glance rather surprising, since, according to most authors, the ulcerations produced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents are due to an impaired prostanoids biosynthesis in the gastric mucosa[10,18,19], and to a local injury as well[13].

It is possible that other mechanisms are involved in the ulcerogenesis caused by indomethacin: the direct cytotoxic effect[20], the promotion of apoptosis of gastric mucosal cells[21-23] as well as the induction of interactions between polymorphonuclear leukocytes and endothelium of gastric mucosa vessels[24-28]. The effects of amphetamine may be related to any of these mechanisms. However, only the links between prostaglandins and adrenergic system are firmly established[29]. Prostaglandins, particularly those from E series inhibit catecholamines release[30,31]. On the other hand, adrenergic stimulation evokes an increase of prostaglandin release[32,33].

It is well known that amphetamine acts mainly via the release of dopamine and noradrenaline from both central and peripheral sites[34,35]. The question arises whether dopamine or noradrenaline or both are involved in the protection of gastric ulcerations afforded by amphetamine. Our previous results have shown that dopaminergic mechanisms were not involved in the protective activity of amphetamine and catecholamines in restraint and reserpine-induced gastric ulcerations[3,5,7]. We did not investigate the involvement of dopamine receptors in indomethacin-ulcerations.

On the other hand, there are data in the literature indicating that the dopaminergic system may be also involved in the genesis of the ulcerations induced by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents[36,37]. So, dopaminergic agonists, such as apomorphine and bromocriptine, diminished significantly the incidence and the severity of the ulcerations evoked by indomethacin in albino rats. The protective activity of apomorphine was antagonized by haloperidol[36]. This agent and other dopaminergic antagonists aggravated gastric ulcerations induced by indomethacin[36], reserpine[37] and stress[38,39]. These findings suggest that dopamine would have a protective activity in various models of experimental ulcers[37,40-42]. It was also shown that gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 markedly affects the central and peripheral dopaminergic system. It blocks the acute stereotype elicited by amphetamine[43]. At the same time, it completely prevents the gastric ulcerations induced by haloperidol[37,44].

More recently, a cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) messenger RNA was isolated from the brain[45,46], peripheral nerves[47] and tissues[48,49]. Its corresponding polypeptide inhibits after central injection, food intake, the gastric emptying and gastric acid secretion in 24 h fasted rats. However, CART polypeptide, ip injection does not have the same effect. It was also shown that the intracisternal injection of CART greatly reduces the gastric acid output elevated by subcutaneous indomethacin administration[50]. These data are consonant with the view that the adrenergic system has a protective action on gastric mucosa.

In conclusion, amphetamine protects gastric mucosa against the damaging effect of indomethacin. The mechanism of action is still obscure, it might involve both the central and peripheral segments of the adrenergic system.

Footnotes

S- Editor Wang GP L- Editor Ma JY E- Editor Bi L

References

  • 1.Anichkov SV, Zavodskaia IS, Moreva EV. [The importance of catecholamines in the development of reflex dystrophies of the stomach wall] Biull Eksp Biol Med. 1967;63:89–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bul'on VV, Khnychenko LK. [A pharmacological analysis of the central monoaminergic mechanisms of the development of neurogenic stomach damage] Farmakol Toksikol. 1990;53:36–38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cuparencu B, Sandor V. Influence of some sympathomimetic amines on the experimental gastric ulcers in rats. Pharmacology. 1977;15:218–226. doi: 10.1159/000136692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zabrodin ON. [Action of adrenergic substances on the healing of experimental neurogenic mucosal damages and on the noradrenaline level in the stomach wall] Farmakol Toksikol. 1984;47:41–44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sandor V, Cuparencu B. Analysis of the mechanism of the protective activity of some sympathomimetic amines in experimental ulcers. Pharmacology. 1977;15:208–217. doi: 10.1159/000136691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sandor V, Cuparencu B. Effects of alpha-methylnoradrenaline and alpha-methyldopamine in reserpine-induced ulcers in rats. Pharmacology. 1981;23:91–94. doi: 10.1159/000137533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rainsford KD. A synergistic interaction between aspirin, or other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and stress which produces severe gastric mucosal damage in rats and pigs. Agents Actions. 1975;5:553–558. doi: 10.1007/BF01972694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bonfils S, Hardouin JP, Bourel M. [Gastric ulcer in the rat by ingestion of phenylbutazone] C R Seances Soc Biol Fil. 1953;147:2016–2018. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Djahanguiri B. The production of acute gastric ulceration by indomethacin in the rat. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1969;4:265–267. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jackson Roberts II L, Morrow JD. Analgesic-antipyretic and anti-inflammatory agents and drugs employed in the treatment of gout. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Goodman Gilman A, eds , editors. Goodman & Gilman's The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. 10th ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2001. pp. 687–731. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Russell RI. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and gastrointestinal damage-problems and solutions. Postgrad Med J. 2001;77:82–88. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.904.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Whittle BJ. Mechanisms underlying gastric mucosal damage induced by indomethacin and bile-salts, and the actions of prostaglandins. Br J Pharmacol. 1977;60:455–460. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1977.tb07522.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Huston GJ. Local buccal mucosal effects of aspirin, indomethacin and isoxepac: their relationship to gastrointestinal damage. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;11:528–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb01165.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Djahanguiri B. Effect of a single dose of phentolamine and MJ 1999 on indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats. Isr J Med Sci. 1969;5:417–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kuratani K, Kodama H, Yamaguchi I. The differential roles of sympathetic nerve activity in the pathogenesis of antral and corpus lesions induced by indomethacin in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994;271:695–702. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Grimm H. Analysis of variance. In: Delaunois AL, ed , editors. Biostatistics in pharmacology. Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press Ltd; 1973. pp. 2: 675–716. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Trimbitas RT. Statistical methods (In Romanian) Cluj–Napoca: Presa Universitara Clujeana; 2000. pp. 209–318. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Robert A. Effects of prostaglandins on the stomach and the intestine. Prostaglandins. 1974;6:523–532. doi: 10.1016/s0090-6980(74)80062-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Takeuchi K, Tanaka A, Hayashi Y, Kubo Y. Functional mechanism underlying COX-2 expression following administration of indomethacin in rat stomachs: importance of gastric hypermotility. Dig Dis Sci. 2004;49:180–187. doi: 10.1023/b:ddas.0000017436.05273.fd. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tomisato W, Tsutsumi S, Hoshino T, Hwang HJ, Mio M, Tsuchiya T, Mizushima T. Role of direct cytotoxic effects of NSAIDs in the induction of gastric lesions. Biochem Pharmacol. 2004;67:575–585. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2003.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chan TA, Morin PJ, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Mechanisms underlying nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-mediated apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:681–686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Piotrowski J, Slomiany A, Slomiany BL. Activation of apoptotic caspase-3 and nitric oxide synthase-2 in gastric mucosal injury induced by indomethacin. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;34:129–134. doi: 10.1080/00365529950172961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Szabó I, Tarnawski AS. Apoptosis in the gastric mucosa: molecular mechanisms, basic and clinical implications. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2000;51:3–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Appleyard CB, McCafferty DM, Tigley AW, Swain MG, Wallace JL. Tumor necrosis factor mediation of NSAID-induced gastric damage: role of leukocyte adherence. Am J Physiol. 1996;270:G42–G48. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1996.270.1.G42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gómez-Gaviro MV, Domínguez-Jiménez C, Carretero JM, Sabando P, González-Alvaro I, Sánchez-Madrid F, Díaz-González F. Down-regulation of L-selectin expression in neutrophils by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: role of intracellular ATP concentration. Blood. 2000;96:3592–3600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McCafferty DM, Granger DN, Wallace JL. Indomethacin-induced gastric injury and leukocyte adherence in arthritic versus healthy rats. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:1173–1180. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)90576-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Murakami K, Okajima K, Harada N, Isobe H, Okabe H. Rebamipide prevents indomethacin-induced gastric mucosal lesion formation by inhibiting activation of neutrophils in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43:139S–142S. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wallace JL, McKnight W, Miyasaka M, Tamatani T, Paulson J, Anderson DC, Granger DN, Kubes P. Role of endothelial adhesion molecules in NSAID-induced gastric mucosal injury. Am J Physiol. 1993;265:G993–G998. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1993.265.5.G993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Weidenfeld J, Kahbha K, Reches A, Shohami E. Role of the central adrenergic system in the regulation of prostaglandin biosynthesis in rat brain. J Neurochem. 1992;58:694–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb09773.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jensen TJ, Nedergaard OA. Modulation of norepinephrine release from sympathetic neurons of the rabbit aorta by prejunctional prostanoid receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;291:7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Molderings G, Malinowska B, Schlicker E. Inhibition of noradrenaline release in the rat vena cava via prostanoid receptors of the EP3-subtype. Br J Pharmacol. 1992;107:352–355. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1992.tb12750.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nebigil C, Malik KU. Comparison of signal transduction mechanisms of alpha-2C and alpha-1A adrenergic receptor-stimulated prostaglandin synthesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1992;263:987–996. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shaffer JE, Malik KU. Enhancement of prostaglandin output during activation of beta-1 adrenoceptors in the isolated rabbit heart. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982;223:729–735. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hoffman BB. Catecholamines, sympathomimetic drugs, and adrenergic receptor antagonists. In: Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Goodman Gilman A, editors. eds. Goodman & Gilman's The pharmacological basis of therapeutics. ed 10. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2001. pp. 215–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sulser F, Sanders-Bush E. Effect of drugs on amines in the CNS. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1971;11:209–230. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pa.11.040171.001233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ray A, Khanna N, Sen P. Possible prostaglandin-dopamine interactions during experimental gastric ulcer formation. Indian J Exp Biol. 1990;28:562–565. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sikiric P, Separovic J, Buljat G, Anic T, Stancic-Rokotov D, Mikus D, Duplancic B, Marovic A, Zoricic I, Prkacin I, et al. Gastric mucosal lesions induced by complete dopamine system failure in rats. The effects of dopamine agents, ranitidine, atropine, omeprazole and pentadecapeptide BPC 157. J Physiol Paris. 2000;94:105–110. doi: 10.1016/s0928-4257(00)00147-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Puri S, Ray A, Chakravarti AK, Sen PA. A differential dopamine receptor involvement during stress ulcer formation in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1994;47:749–752. doi: 10.1016/0091-3057(94)90184-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ray A, Henke PG, Sullivan RM. Central dopamine systems and gastric stress pathology in rats. Physiol Behav. 1988;42:359–364. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(88)90277-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Glavin GB. Central dopamine involvement in experimental gastrointestinal injury. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 1992;16:217–221. doi: 10.1016/0278-5846(92)90073-n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hernandez DE, Adcock JW, Orlando RC, Patrick KS, Nemeroff CB, Prange AJ Jr. Prevention of stress-induced gastric ulcers by dopamine agonists in the rat. Life Sci. 1984;35:2453–2458. doi: 10.1016/0024-3205(84)90454-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Sikirić P, Geber J, Suchanek E, Ivanović D, Gjuris V, Aleksić J, Reić P, Marović A. The role of dopamine in the formation of gastric ulcers in rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1985;112:127–128. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(85)90249-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sikiric P, Jelovac N, Jelovac-Gjeldum A, Dodig G, Staresinic M, Anic T, Zoricic I, Rak D, Perovic D, Aralica G, et al. Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 attenuates chronic amphetamine-induced behavior disturbances. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2002;23:412–422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jelovac N, Sikiric P, Rucman R, Petek M, Marovic A, Perovic D, Seiwerth S, Mise S, Turkovic B, Dodig G, et al. Pentadecapeptide BPC 157 attenuates disturbances induced by neuroleptics: the effect on catalepsy and gastric ulcers in mice and rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 1999;379:19–31. doi: 10.1016/s0014-2999(99)00486-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Douglass J, McKinzie AA, Couceyro P. PCR differential display identifies a rat brain mRNA that is transcriptionally regulated by cocaine and amphetamine. J Neurosci. 1995;15:2471–2481. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-02471.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li HY, Hwang HW, Hu YH. Functional characterizations of cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript mRNA expression in rat hypothalamus. Neurosci Lett. 2002;323:203–206. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00151-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Broberger C, Holmberg K, Kuhar MJ, Hökfelt T. Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript in the rat vagus nerve: A putative mediator of cholecystokinin-induced satiety. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:13506–13511. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Dun NJ, Dun SL, Wong PY, Yang J, Chang J. Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide in the rat epididymis: an immunohistochemical and electrophysiological study. Biol Reprod. 2000;63:1518–1524. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod63.5.1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Thim L, Kristensen P, Nielsen PF, Wulff BS, Clausen JT. Tissue-specific processing of cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptides in the rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:2722–2727. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.2722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Okumura T, Yamada H, Motomura W, Kohgo Y. Cocaine-amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) acts in the central nervous system to inhibit gastric acid secretion via brain corticotropin-releasing factor system. Endocrinology. 2000;141:2854–2860. doi: 10.1210/endo.141.8.7588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from World Journal of Gastroenterology : WJG are provided here courtesy of Baishideng Publishing Group Inc

RESOURCES