Skip to main content
Frontiers in Plant Science logoLink to Frontiers in Plant Science
. 2014 Jul 9;5:346. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00346

Glyco-engineering for biopharmaceutical production in moss bioreactors

Eva L Decker 1,*, Juliana Parsons 1, Ralf Reski 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC4089626  PMID: 25071817

Abstract

The production of recombinant biopharmaceuticals (pharmaceutical proteins) is a strongly growing area in the pharmaceutical industry. While most products to date are produced in mammalian cell cultures, namely Chinese hamster ovary cells, plant-based production systems gained increasing acceptance over the last years. Different plant systems have been established which are suitable for standardization and precise control of cultivation conditions, thus meeting the criteria for pharmaceutical production. The majority of biopharmaceuticals comprise glycoproteins. Therefore, differences in protein glycosylation between humans and plants have to be taken into account and plant-specific glycosylation has to be eliminated to avoid adverse effects on quality, safety, and efficacy of the products. The basal land plant Physcomitrella patens (moss) has been employed for the recombinant production of high-value therapeutic target proteins (e.g., Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, Complement Factor H, monoclonal antibodies, Erythropoietin). Being genetically excellently characterized and exceptionally amenable for precise gene targeting via homologous recombination, essential steps for the optimization of moss as a bioreactor for the production of recombinant proteins have been undertaken. Here, we discuss the glyco-engineering approaches to avoid non-human N- and O-glycosylation on target proteins produced in moss bioreactors.

Keywords: Physcomitrella patens, moss bioreactor, plant-made pharmaceuticals, glycosylation, posttranslational modifications

INTRODUCTION

Biopharmaceuticals are indispensable in modern medicine. In 2010 more than 200 biopharmaceuticals were available on the market and around 10–20 more are approved every year (Walsh, 2010a). As the biggest group of biopharmaceuticals consists of pharmaceutical recombinant proteins, this term is often used as a synonym for the former. The biochemical and pharmacological properties of a protein are not only determined by its amino acid sequence but also largely influenced by a palette of modifications that proteins undergo co- or posttranslationally (Mann and Jensen, 2003), usually grouped together and referred to as posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Common PTMs found in pharmaceutical proteins are glycosylation, hydroxylation, carboxylation, amidation, sulfatation, disulfide bond formation, and proteolytic processing (Walsh and Jefferis, 2006). Among these, glycosylation is the most frequent PTM, being present in at least 40% of the pharmaceutical recombinant proteins available on the market (Walsh, 2010b). The presence and quality of glycosylation plays a crucial role for the pharmacological properties of a therapeutic protein by influencing protein folding and stability, serum half-life, in vivo activity, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity (Li and d’Anjou, 2009). Approximately 50% of all eukaryotic proteins are predicted to be glycosylated and this proportion increases substantially with respect to human serum proteins, which are main targets as biopharmaceuticals (Apweiler et al., 1999).

The workhorse for the production of simple proteins is Escherichia coli, the best characterized expression system offering high product yields at low costs (Walsh, 2010a). However, this microorganism is not able to perform some PTMs, which are indispensable for recombinant therapeutical proteins (Kamionka, 2011). Consequently, mammalian cell lines are the preferred expression systems for the production of recombinant glycoproteins, as their protein glycosylation patterns largely resemble those of humans (Schmidt, 2004). Among the mammalian cell lines, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells comprise the leading host system for current biopharmaceuticals, even though several CHO-derived products presented non-human glycosylation (Chung et al., 2008; Hossler et al., 2009; Omasa et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2012).

As higher eukaryotes, plants are able to synthesize complex multimeric proteins and perform PTMs in a similar manner as humans do. Therefore, plants and plant cell cultures are gradually gaining acceptance as production hosts for recombinant biopharmaceuticals. The first plant-made pharmaceutical (PMP) received market approval in 2012 (http://www.protalix.com/products/elelyso-taliglucerase-alfa.asp) and several additional PMPs are being tested in clinical trials (reviewed in Paul and Ma, 2011). The host system for ElelysoTM, a recombinant glucocerebrosidase for the treatment of the lysosomal storage disease Morbus Gaucher, is a carrot-based cell line established by Protalix (Shaaltiel et al., 2007). It is cultured in bioreactors based on disposable plastic bags. While other frequently used plant systems like alfalfa, tobacco, and Nicotiana benthamiana need to be grown in greenhouses, bioreactor cultivation is established for the aquatic plant Lemna minor and for the moss Physcomitrella patens (Decker and Reski, 2007; Paul and Ma, 2011; Paul et al., 2013). Within the following sections we will focus on the special features for biopharmaceutical production and achievements within glyco-engineering of the moss system.

MOSS CULTIVATION AND ENGINEERING CHARACTERISTICS

The non-seed plant P. patens, a moss, is a well-established model system for evolutionary and functional genomics approaches (Cove et al., 2006; Menand et al., 2007; Mosquna et al., 2009; Khraiwesh et al., 2010; Sakakibara et al., 2013). It can be grown throughout its complete life cycle under contained conditions in vitro in a simple mineral medium (Frank et al., 2005; Strotbek et al., 2013). The germination of the haploid spores leads to the growth of protonema (Figure 1A), a branched filamentous tissue which comprises two distinct cell types, chloronema and caulonema. Every cell is in direct contact with the culture medium, allowing efficient nutrient uptake and product secretion (Schillberg et al., 2013). This young tissue can be maintained in suspension cultures without any addition of phytohormones, only by mechanical disruption of the filaments. In contrast to immortalized or de-differentiated mammalian or higher-plant cell cultures, which are prone to instability or somaclonal variation (Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981; Xu et al., 2011; Bailey et al., 2012), the fully differentiated protonema tissue is genetically stable (Reutter and Reski, 1996). In the next developmental step, buds differentiating from protonema cells give rise to the adult plant, the leafy gametophore, consisting of shoot-like, leaf-like, and root-like tissues (Figure 1B). After fertilization of the gametes, the sporophyte, the only diploid tissue in the life cycle of mosses, grows on and is sustained by the gametophore (Reski et al., 1998). In vitro cultivation of all stages can be performed either on agar plates or as suspension cultures in liquid media. The availability of efficient protocols for protoplast isolation (Figure 1C) and transfection (Rother et al., 1994; Strotbek et al., 2013) and an excellent regeneration capacity of single transfected cells to whole plants make genetic engineering of moss a straight-forward and frequently used approach (e.g., Lorenz et al., 2003; Qudeimat et al., 2008; Ludwig-Müller et al., 2009; Mosquna et al., 2009; Khraiwesh et al., 2010; Sakakibara et al., 2013). The created moss strains can be preserved by cryo-conservation (Schulte and Reski, 2004), and thus can serve as Master Cell Banks. The International Moss Stock Center IMSC, a reference center for moss ecotypes and transgenic lines, provides a service for long-term storage (http://www.moss-stock-center.org).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Physcomitrella patens in vitro cultivation and schematic representation of a knockout construct for gene targeting. (A) young filamentous tissue, protonema, ideal for suspension cultures; (B) adult leafy moss plant (gametophore); (C) protoplasts; (D) small scale liquid culture in flasks; (E) stirred tank bioreactor; (F) wave bioreactor (image courtesy of greenovation Biotech GmbH); (G) illustration of allele replacement via homologous recombination. The regions homologous to the targeted gene, which are used for the knockout construct, are shown in gray, and the inserted selection cassette is depicted in white. Thick lines represent introns and rectangles exons. Scale bars 50 μm (A,B), 500 μm (C).

The employment of in vitro axenic plant cell or tissue cultures offers an environment in which contamination with human pathogens is rather unlikely (Schillberg et al., 2013). Moreover, only in these systems culture conditions can be precisely controlled and standardized (Hohe and Reski, 2005), which is essential for the production of pharmaceuticals according to good manufacturing practice (GMP) guidelines (Fischer et al., 2012).

Various scales of highly controllable cultivation devices were developed for Physcomitrella, ranging from simple shaking flasks (Figure 1D) and 5 L aerated flasks to diverse forms of photobioreactors, including stirred glass tank bioreactors with a volume of up to 15 L (Figure 1E; Hohe and Reski, 2002) and a modular tubular bioreactor with a working volume of up to 100 L (reviewed in Decker and Reski, 2008, 2012). More recently, disposable wave-bag reactors (Figure 1F) were employed for high-density protein production purposes under full cGMP compliance (http://www.greenovation.com). Several pharmaceutically interesting proteins have been synthesized in moss bioreactors, among them the growth factors vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF; Baur et al., 2005) and erythropoietin (EPO; Weise et al., 2007) as well as the first marketed product for research use, human FGF7/keratinocyte growth factor (KGF; www.greenovation.com). In addition, proteins with a function in immune responses like IgGs (Schuster et al., 2007; Kircheis et al., 2012) and the complement-regulatory protein factor H (Büttner-Mainik et al., 2011) were produced in moss. Furthermore, two products for enzyme-replacement therapies, human alpha-galactosidase and glucocerebrosidase are expected to reach clinical trial phases by the end of 2014 (www.greenovation.com).

The use of Physcomitrella as a production host for recombinant biopharmaceuticals was facilitated by well-developed molecular toolboxes. Heterologous as well as endogenous promoters were characterized for their suitability to achieve high levels of recombinant product (Horstmann et al., 2004; Weise et al., 2006). In addition, several moss-derived signal peptides were evaluated for improved secretion of the recombinant product to the surrounding medium (Schaaf et al., 2004, 2005; Weise et al., 2006). The moss genome sequence is available since 2008 (Rensing et al., 2008), and together with nearly 400,000 expressed sequence tags (ESTs) obtained from different experimental conditions, tissues, and developmental stages (Nishiyama et al., 2003; Lang et al., 2008) it allows a reliable prediction of gene structures. The internet resource http://www.cosmoss.org provides access to a high-quality functional annotation including more than 32,000 protein-coding genes (Zimmer et al., 2013). This resource was very convenient for the identification of genes involved in the glycosylation of recombinant proteins synthesized in moss bioreactors.

However, the main driver for moss functional genomics approaches in general and glyco-engineering in particular was the unique accessibility of this organism for gene targeting approaches via homologous recombination. Displaying an exceptionally high rate of homologous recombination in mitotic cells (Strepp et al., 1998; Schaefer, 2001; Hohe et al., 2004; Kamisugi et al., 2006), base-specific precise genetic engineering is feasible with high efficiency. Undesirable gene functions can be completely eliminated by targeted knockout approaches. The knockout construct used for the transfection of moss protoplasts regularly consists of 700–1000 bp genomic DNA (homologous regions) flanking each side of a selection cassette, which interrupts or replaces the target gene when indicated (Figure 1G). Glyco-engineering of moss was successfully accomplished by various gene targeting approaches (see below).

PROTEIN GLYCOSYLATION AND MOSS GLYCO-ENGINEERING

Protein glycosylation is a complex and heterogeneous modification which can be classified in two main categories, N- and O-glycosylation. In the former, the carbohydrates are attached to the amide group of asparagine (N) in the consensus sequence N-X-S/T (where X can be any amino acid except proline, and the third amino acid can be either serine or threonine; Mononen and Karjalainen, 1984; Gavel and von Heijne, 1990). O-glycans, on the other hand, are attached to the hydroxyl group of serine (S), threonine (T), hydroxylysine or hydroxyproline (Hyp; Varki et al., 2009). In contrast to N-glycosylation, consensus sequences for O-glycosylation in mammals are not well defined or non-existing (Hansen et al., 1998; Julenius et al., 2005).

N-glycosylation in animals is a largely cell-type and species-specific feature (Raju et al., 2000; Croset et al., 2012). Moreover, potential glycosylation sites on a given protein can be either unmodified or occupied by varying glycan structures which result from the maturation of the glycan throughout the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus (GA), leading to microheterogeneity of glycoproteins (Kolarich et al., 2012). Compared to other higher eukaryotes, plants display more conserved glycan patterns between different species and a less diverse palette of N-glycans (Bosch et al., 2013), fascilitating the production of homogeneous glycoproteins.

As higher eukaryotes, plants are able to produce N-glycans of the complex type with the core sugar structure Man3GlcNAc2 consisting of two N-acetylglucosamine and three mannose residues that is identical to humans (Lerouge et al., 1998; Wilson, 2002). Up to two terminally attached GlcNAc residues are also common between plant and bi-antennary mammalian complex-type glycoprotein oligosaccharides (reviewed in Gomord et al., 2010). Differing from the human structure, which displays a fucose residue 1,6-linked to the proximal GlcNAc moiety, most plant N-glycans carry a β1,2 xylose and an α1,3 fucose linked to the glycan core. These sugar structures are common for all land plants analyzed so far, including mosses as the evolutionary oldest group (Koprivova et al., 2003; Viëtor et al., 2003). Their presence raised concerns about plant-produced biopharmaceuticals as they were shown to induce antibody formation in mammals (van Ree et al., 2000; Bardor et al., 2003; Westphal et al., 2003; Bencúrová et al., 2004; Jin et al., 2008). The consequence of an immune response against the pharmaceutical can lead to antibody-mediated reduction of product efficacy as well as to severe clinical complications (Schellekens, 2002).

Consequently, first plant glyco-engineering approaches aimed at targeting the glycosyltransferases responsible for the addition of these two residues. Ten years ago Arabidopsis thaliana as well as moss lines lacking β1,2 xylosylation and α1,3 fucosylation have been generated (Koprivova et al., 2004; Strasser et al., 2004). The predominant glycan type of the double knockout moss line for β1,2 xylosyltransferase (XylT) and α1,3 fucosyltransferase (FucT) was the GnGn form (GlcNAc2Man3GlcNAc2; Koprivova et al., 2004). A ΔXylT/FucT genotype is currently in use as genetic background for most of the recombinant products described from moss bioreactors.

Lacking the core fucose, the engineered moss N-glycans differ from the human ones which contain an α1,6-linked fucose residue. However, lack of this residue proved to be advantageous for the efficacy of antibodies targeting tumor cells (Shields et al., 2002; Shinkawa et al., 2003; Cox et al., 2006; Schuster et al., 2007). The underlying phenomenon, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC), comprises receptor binding and activation of a natural killer cell by an antigen–antibody complex on the target cell surface resulting in lysis of the target cell. Binding and activation of the killer cells was up to 40× more efficient with a monoclonal antibody produced in glyco-engineered, fucose-lacking moss cells compared to the same antibody produced in CHO cells (Schuster et al., 2007).

In addition to the GnGn N-glycan form, many plant species display α1,4 fucose, and β1,3 galactose linked to the terminal GlcNAc residues on one or both of the antennae (Wilson, 2001). This trisaccharide Fucα1-4(Galβ1-3)GlcNAc is known as Lewis A (Lea) structure. It is synthesized by β1,3 galactosyltransferases (GalT) and α1,4 fucosyltransferases as the last steps of N-glycan maturation in the plant GA (reviewed in Gomord et al., 2010). In contrast to the high prevalence of xylose and core fucose residues on plant N-glycans, Lea structures are found in a much lower proportion (Fitchette-Lainé et al., 1997; Koprivova et al., 2003; Viëtor et al., 2003; Strasser et al., 2007). However, Lea epitopes were described on recombinant proteins produced in plants (Petruccelli et al., 2006; Weise et al., 2007; Castilho et al., 2013). The production of recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) in both moss and N. benthamiana, lead to proteins decorated with high amounts of Lea structures (Weise et al., 2007; Castilho et al., 2013). Although Lea epitopes are found in humans as part of the Lewis-positive histo-blood groups (Henry et al., 1995), they are rarely present in healthy adults, but increased in patients with certain types of cancer (Zhang et al., 1994). Furthermore, antibodies against Lea epitopes are frequent (Wilson et al., 2001). Therefore, it is advisable to remove the respective β1,3 galactose and α1,4 fucose residues from plant-produced recombinant products.

A single putative α1,4 fucosyltransferase gene was detected in the moss genome. While the targeted knockout of this gene resulted in the loss of terminal α1,4 fucose residues, β1,3-linked galactoses were still present on moss N-glycans. In contrast to the single-copy α1,4 fucosyltransferase gene, 13 putative galt homologs were identified in P. patens. Out of these, exclusively one gene (galt1) was shown to be responsible for the synthesis of Lea in moss. The disruption of galt1 alone resulted in the absence of the complete Lea epitope, not only of the galactose residue but also of the terminal fucose, both in the total moss N-glycan pool and on the moss-produced rhEPO (Parsons et al., 2012). The absence of the α1,4 fucose in the galt1 knockout line (Δgalt1) with intact α1,4 fucosyltransferase activity confirmed that this is the last enzyme in the plant N-glycosylation pathway and that the presence of galactose on the substrate is indispensable for the fucosyltransferase activity (Parsons et al., 2012). The lack of GalT1 activity did not affect the moss growth rate. The homogeneity of the rhEPO glycosylation achieved in the moss galt1 knockout line was remarkable, with almost only one glycosylation form, the aimed core structure with terminal GlcNAc residues (Parsons et al., 2012; Figure 2).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Glycopeptides of moss-produced rhEPO from two glyco-engineered moss lines. Comparison of the mass spectra for the rhEPO tryptic peptide harboring two glycosylation sites (EAENITTGCAEHCSLNENITVPDTK) produced in glyco-engineered moss lines: double KO ΔXylT/FucT and triple KO ΔXylT/FucT/GalT (based on Parsons et al., 2012). Salt adducts are marked with asterisks. The glycosylation patterns are schematized with sugar symbols above each peak. Lea structures are totally absent in the triple KO line.

In humans, the GnGn glycan is frequently further elongated with galactose added in β1,4 linkage and this is often capped with sialic acid residues. The targeted insertion (“knockin”) of the human β1,4 galt into the moss genome demonstrated the general feasibility of β1,4 galactosylation of moss N-glycans (Huether et al., 2005; Parsons et al., 2012). Further terminal elongation of plant N-glycans has been demonstrated for N. benthamiana which transiently produced glycoproteins with human-like sialylation (Castilho et al., 2013; Jez et al., 2013). This will be a future task for moss glyco-engineering.

Outstanding success has been achieved so far by engineering plant N-glycosylation patterns for the production of humanized glycoproteins. In contrast, the issue of adverse O-glycosylation in PMPs has not been addressed in the same detail. Concerning plant O-glycan engineering, recombinant proteins displaying human so-called mucin-type O-glycosylation were generated recently (Daskalova et al., 2010; Castilho et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2012). In contrast to rather conserved N-glycosylation patterns, plant-typical O-glycosylation differs fundamentally from the typical human mucin-type O-glycosylation (reviewed by Gomord et al., 2010), and was shown to induce the formation of antibodies (Léonard et al., 2005). In plants, the main attachment site for O-glycosylation is 4-trans-Hyp (reviewed by Showalter, 2001), while no glycosylation of Hyp occurs in animals (Gorres and Raines, 2010). Hyp is generated posttranslationally by prolyl 4-hydroxylases (P4H) via hydroxylation of proline. Prolyl-hydroxylation is a very common modification both in mammals and in plants, though recognition sequences differ. In plants, the target motif for O-glycosylation after P4H-catalyzed hydroxylation, the so-called glycomodules present on Hyp-rich glycoproteins (HRGPs), are defined (Kieliszewski and Lamport, 1994) and validated (Tan et al., 2003; Shimizu et al., 2005). In silico analysis of the human proteome revealed that 30% of the human proteins bear a recognition sequence for plant P4Hs (Gomord et al., 2010), thus being putative candidates for non-human prolyl-hydroxylation when recombinantly produced in plant-based systems. In fact, undesired plant-typical prolyl-hydroxylation and in some cases even non-human O-glycosylation of biopharmaceuticals was reported (Karnoup, 2005; Weise et al., 2007; Pinkhasov et al., 2011). The most direct strategy to avoid non-human O-glycosylation in PMPs is the elimination of the anchor Hyp, which itself is an undesired PTM performed by plant P4H enzymes.

After systematic disruption of each of the six p4h genes in Physcomitrella, targeted deletion of p4h1 resulted in the complete elimination of the previously reported prolyl-hydroxylation of moss-produced rhEPO (Parsons et al., 2013). As prolyl-hydroxylation and further glycosylation of plant extracellular matrix and cell wall proteins play important roles for growth, cell differentiation, and stress adaption (Lamport et al., 2006; Velasquez et al., 2011) we expected a negative impact on the growth rate of the lines. However, the Δp4h1 moss lines were not impaired neither in growth or development nor in protein productivity (Parsons et al., 2013).

The ease of gene targeting in moss enabled glyco-engineering approaches for the elimination of any plant-typical immunogenic residues. This provides a plant-based system offering the stable production of safe protein therapeutics.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Eva L. Decker, Juliana Parsons, and Ralf Reski were involved in gathering and interpretation of data, writing the manuscript and revising the work. Ralf Reski is co-inventor of the moss bioreactor and co-founder of greenovation Biotech. He currently serves as advisory board member of this company. Eva L. Decker, Juliana Parsons, and Ralf Reski are co-inventors of patents and patent applications related to the topic discussed here.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by contract research “Glykobiologie/Glykomik” of the Baden-Württemberg Stiftung and by the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments (EXC294 to Ralf Reski). We thank Anne Katrin Prowse for proof-reading of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

  1. Apweiler R., Hermjakob H., Sharon N. (1999). On the frequency of protein glycosylation, as deduced from analysis of the SWISS-PROT database. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1473 4–8 10.1016/S0304-4165(99)00165-168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bailey L. A., Hatton D., Field R., Dickson A. J. (2012). Determination of Chinese hamster ovary cell line stability and recombinant antibody expression during long-term culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 109 2093–2103 10.1002/bit.24485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bardor M., Faveeuw C., Fitchette A.-C., Gilbert D., Galas L., Trottein F., et al. (2003). Immunoreactivity in mammals of two typical plant glyco-epitopes, core α(1,3)-fucose and core xylose. Glycobiology 13 427–434 10.1093/glycob/cwg024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baur A., Reski R., Gorr G. (2005). Enhanced recovery of a secreted recombinant human growth factor using stabilizing additives and by co-expression of human serum albumin in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Plant Biotechnol. J. 3 331–340 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00127.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bencúrová M., Hemmer W., Focke-Tejkl M., Wilson I. B. H., Altmann F. (2004). Specificity of IgG and IgE antibodies against plant and insect glycoprotein glycans determined with artificial glycoforms of human transferrin. Glycobiology 14 457–466 10.1093/glycob/cwh058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bosch D., Castilho A., Loos A., Schots A., Steinkellner H. (2013). N-glycosylation of plant-produced recombinant proteins. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19 5503–5512 10.2174/1381612811319310006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Büttner-Mainik A., Parsons J., Jérôme H., Hartmann A., Lamer S., Schaaf A., et al. (2011). Production of biologically active recombinant human factor H in Physcomitrella. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9 373–383 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2010.00552.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Castilho A., Neumann L., Daskalova S., Mason H. S., Steinkellner H., Altmann F., et al. (2012). Engineering of sialylated mucin-type O-glycosylation in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 287 36518–36526 10.1074/jbc.M112.402685 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Castilho A., Neumann L., Gattinger P., Strasser R., Vorauer-Uhl K., Sterovsky T., et al. (2013). Generation of biologically active multi-sialylated recombinant human EPOFc in plants. PLoS ONE 8:e54836 10.1371/journal.pone.0054836 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chung C. H., Mirakhur B., Chan E., Le Q.-T., Berlin J., Morse M., et al. (2008). Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-α-1,3-galactose. N. Engl. J. Med. 358 1109–1117 10.1056/NEJMoa074943 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cove D., Bezanilla M., Harries P., Quatrano R. (2006). Mosses as model systems for the study of metabolism and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 57 497–520 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Cox K. M., Sterling J. D., Regan J. T., Gasdaska J. R., Frantz K. K., Peele C. G., et al. (2006). Glycan optimization of a human monoclonal antibody in the aquatic plant Lemna minor. Nat. Biotechnol. 24 1591–1597 10.1038/nbt1260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Croset A., Delafosse L., Gaudry J.-P., Arod C., Glez L., Losberger C., et al. (2012). Differences in the glycosylation of recombinant proteins expressed in HEK and CHO cells. J. Biotechnol. 161 336–348 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.06.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Daskalova S. M., Radder J. E., Cichacz Z. A., Olsen S. H., Tsaprailis G., Mason H., et al. (2010). Engineering of N. benthamiana L. plants for production of N-acetylgalactosamine-glycosylated proteins–towards development of a plant-based platform for production of protein therapeutics with mucin type O-glycosylation. BMC Biotechnol. 10:62 10.1186/1472-6750-10-62 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Decker E. L., Reski R. (2007). Moss bioreactors producing improved biopharmaceuticals. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18 393–398 10.1016/j.copbio.2007.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Decker E. L., Reski R. (2008). Current achievements in the production of complex biopharmaceuticals with moss bioreactors. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 31 3–9 10.1007/s00449-007-0151-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Decker E. L., Reski R. (2012). Glycoprotein production in moss bioreactors. Plant Cell Rep. 31 453–460 10.1007/s00299-011-1152-1155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer R., Schillberg S., Hellwig S., Twyman R. M., Drossard J. (2012). GMP issues for recombinant plant-derived pharmaceutical proteins. Biotechnol. Adv. 30 434–439 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fitchette-Lainé A.-C., Gomord V., Cabanes M., Michalski J.-C., Saint Macary M., Foucher B., et al. (1997). N-glycans harboring the Lewis A epitope are expressed at the surface of plant cells. Plant J. 12 1411–1417 10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12061411.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Frank W., Decker E. L., Reski R. (2005). Molecular tools to study Physcomitrella patens. Plant Biol. 7 220–227 10.1055/s-2005-865645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gavel Y., von Heijne G. (1990). Sequence differences between glycosylated and non-glycosylated Asn-X-Thr/Ser acceptor sites: implications for protein engineering. Protein Eng. 3 433–442 10.1093/protein/3.5.433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gomord V., Fitchette A.-C., Menu-Bouaouiche L., Saint-Jore-Dupas C., Plasson C., Michaud D., et al. (2010). Plant-specific glycosylation patterns in the context of therapeutic protein production. Plant Biotechnol. J. 8 564–587 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00497.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gorres K. L., Raines R. T. (2010). Prolyl 4-hydroxylase. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 45 106–124 10.3109/10409231003627991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hansen J. E., Lund O., Tolstrup N., Gooley A. A., Williams K. L., Brunak S. (1998). NetOglyc: prediction of mucin type O-glycosylation sites based on sequence context and surface accessibility. Glycoconj. J. 15 115–130 10.1023/A:1006960004440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Henry S., Oriol R., Samuelsson B. (1995). Lewis histo-blood group system and associated secretory phenotypes. Vox Sang. 69 166–182 10.1111/j.1423-0410.1995.tb02591.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hohe A., Egener T., Lucht J. M., Holtorf H., Reinhard C., Schween G., et al. (2004). An improved and highly standardised transformation procedure allows efficient production of single and multiple targeted gene-knockouts in a moss, Physcomitrella patens. Curr. Genet. 44 339–347 10.1007/s00294-003-0458-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hohe A., Reski R. (2002). Optimisation of a bioreactor culture of the moss Physcomitrella patens for mass production of protoplasts. Plant Sci. 163 69–74 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00059-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hohe A., Reski R. (2005). Control of growth and differentiation of bioreactor cultures of Physcomitrella by environmental parameters. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 81 307–311 10.1007/s11240-004-6656-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Horstmann V., Huether C. M., Jost W., Reski R., Decker E. L. (2004). Quantitative promoter analysis in Physcomitrella patens: a set of plant vectors activating gene expression within three orders of magnitude. BMC Biotechnol. 4:13 10.1186/1472-6750-4-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hossler P., Khattak S. F., Li Z. J. (2009). Optimal and consistent protein glycosylation in mammalian cell culture. Glycobiology 19 936–949 10.1093/glycob/cwp079 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Huether C. M., Lienhart O., Baur A., Stemmer C., Gorr G., Reski R., et al. (2005). Glyco-engineering of moss lacking plant-specific sugar residues. Plant Biol. 7 292–299 10.1055/s-2005-837653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Jez J., Castilho A., Grass J., Vorauer-Uhl K., Sterovsky T., Altmann F., et al. (2013). Expression of functionally active sialylated human erythropoietin in plants. Biotechnol. J. 8 371–382 10.1002/biot.201200363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jin C., Altmann F., Strasser R., Mach L., Schähs M., Kunert R., et al. (2008). A plant-derived human monoclonal antibody induces an anti-carbohydrate immune response in rabbits. Glycobiology 18 235–241 10.1093/glycob/cwm137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Julenius K., Mølgaard A., Gupta R., Brunak S. (2005). Prediction, conservation analysis, and structural characterization of mammalian mucin-type O-glycosylation sites. Glycobiology 15 153–164 10.1093/glycob/cwh151 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kamionka M. (2011). Engineering of therapeutic proteins production in Escherichia coli. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 12 268–274 10.2174/138920111794295693 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Kamisugi Y., Schlink K., Rensing S. A., Schween G., von Stackelberg M., Cuming A. C., et al. (2006). The mechanism of gene targeting in Physcomitrella patens: homologous recombination, concatenation and multiple integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 6205–6214 10.1093/nar/gkl832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Karnoup A. S. (2005). O-linked glycosylation in maize-expressed human IgA1. Glycobiology 15 965–981 10.1093/glycob/cwi077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Khraiwesh B., Arif M. A., Seumel G. I., Ossowski S., Weigel D., Reski R., et al. (2010). Transcriptional control of gene expression by microRNAs. Cell 140 111–122 10.1016/j.cell.2009.12.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kieliszewski M. J., Lamport D. T. A. (1994). Extensin: repetitive motifs, functional sites, post-translational codes, and phylogeny. Plant J. 5 157–172 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1994.05020157.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kim J. Y., Kim Y.-G., Lee G. M. (2012). CHO cells in biotechnology for production of recombinant proteins: current state and further potential. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93 917–930 10.1007/s00253-011-3758-3755 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kircheis R., Halanek N., Koller I., Jost W., Schuster M., Gorr G., et al. (2012). Correlation of ADCC activity with cytokine release induced by the stably expressed, glyco-engineered humanized Lewis Y-specific monoclonal antibody MB314. MAbs 4 532–541 10.4161/mabs.20577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kolarich D., Jensen P. H., Altmann F., Packer N. H. (2012). Determination of site-specific glycan heterogeneity on glycoproteins. Nat. Protoc. 7 1285–1298 10.1038/nprot.2012.062 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Koprivova A., Altmann F., Gorr G., Kopriva S., Reski R., Decker E. L. (2003). N-glycosylation in the moss Physcomitrella patens is organized similarly to that in higher plants. Plant Biol. 5 582–591 10.1055/s-2003-44721 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Koprivova A., Stemmer C., Altmann F., Hoffmann A., Kopriva S., Gorr G., et al. (2004). Targeted knockouts of Physcomitrella lacking plantspecific immunogenic N-glycans. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2 517–523 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2004.00100.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lamport D. T., Kieliszewski M. J., Showalter A. M. (2006). Salt stress upregulates periplasmic arabinogalactan proteins: using salt stress to analyse AGP function. New Phytol. 169 479–492 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01591.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lang D., Zimmer A. D., Rensing S. A., Reski R. (2008). Exploring plant biodiversity: the Physcomitrella genome and beyond. Trends Plant Sci. 13 542–549 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Larkin P. J., Scowcroft W. R. (1981). Somaclonal variation–a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60 197–214 10.1007/BF02342540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Léonard R., Lhernould S., Carlué M., Fleurat P., Maftah A., Costa G. (2005). Biochemical characterization of Silene alba α4-fucosyltransferase and Lewis a products. Glycoconj. J. 22 71–78 10.1007/s10719-005-0404-404 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lerouge P., Cabanes-Macheteau M., Rayon C., Fischette-Lainé A.-C., Gomord V., Faye L. (1998). N-glycoprotein biosynthesis in plants: recent developments and future trends. Plant Mol. Biol. 38 31–48 10.1023/A:1006012005654 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Li H., d’Anjou M. (2009). Pharmacological significance of glycosylation in therapeutic proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 20 678–684 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Lorenz S., Tintelnot S., Reski R., Decker E. L. (2003). Cyclin D-knockout uncouples developmental progression from sugar availability. Plant Mol. Biol. 53 227–236 10.1023/B:PLAN.0000009295.07016.87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Ludwig-Müller J., Jülke S., Bierfreund N. M., Decker E. L., Reski R. (2009). Moss (Physcomitrella patens) GH3 proteins act in auxin homeostasis. New Phytol. 181 323–338 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02677.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mann M., Jensen O. N. (2003). Proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications. Nat. Biotechnol. 21 255–261 10.1038/nbt0303-255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Menand B., Yi K., Jouannic S., Hoffmann L., Ryan E., Linstead P., et al. (2007). An ancient mechanism controls the development of cells with a rooting function in land plants. Science 316 1477–1480 10.1126/science.1142618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mononen I., Karjalainen E. (1984). Structural comparison of protein sequences around potential N-glycosylation sites. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 788 364–367 10.1016/0167-4838(84)90050-90055 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mosquna A., Katz A., Decker E. L., Rensing S. A., Reski R., Ohad N. (2009). Regulation of stem cell maintenance by the Polycomb protein FIE has been conserved during land plant evolution. Development 136 2433–2444 10.1242/dev.035048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nishiyama T., Fujita T., Shin-I T., Seki M., Nishide H., Uchiyama I., et al. (2003). Comparative genomics of Physcomitrella patens gametophytic transcriptome and Arabidopsis thaliana: implication for land plant evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100 8007–8012 10.1073/pnas.0932694100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Omasa T., Onitsuka M., Kim W.-D. (2010). Cell engineering and cultivation of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 11 233–240 10.2174/138920110791111960 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Parsons J., Altmann F., Arrenberg C. K., Koprivova A., Beike A. K., Stemmer C., et al. (2012). Moss-based production of asialo-erythropoietin devoid of Lewis A and other plant-typical carbohydrate determinants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 10 851–861 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00704.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Parsons J., Altmann F., Graf M., Stadlmann J., Reski R., Decker E. L. (2013). A gene responsible for prolyl-hydroxylation of moss-produced recombinant human erythropoietin. Sci. Rep. 3:3019 10.1038/srep03019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Paul M., Ma J. K.-C. (2011). Plant-made pharmaceuticals: leading products and production platforms. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 58 58–67 10.1002/bab.6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Paul M. J., Teh A. Y., Twyman R. M., Ma J. K. (2013). Target product selection–where can molecular pharming make the difference? Curr. Pharm. Des. 19 5478–5485 10.2174/1381612811319310003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Petruccelli S., Otegui M. S., Lareu F., Tran Dinh O., Fitchette A.-C., Circosta A., et al. (2006). A KDEL-tagged monoclonal antibody is efficiently retained in the endoplasmic reticulum in leaves, but is both partially secreted and sorted to protein storage vacuoles in seeds. Plant Biotechnol. J. 4 511–527 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00200.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pinkhasov J., Alvarez M. L., Rigano M. M., Piensook K., Larios D., Pabst M., et al. (2011). Recombinant plant-expressed tumour-associated MUC1 peptide is immunogenic and capable of breaking tolerance in MUC1.Tg mice. Plant Biotechnol. J. 9 991–1001 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2011.00614.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Qudeimat E., Faltusz A. M. C., Wheeler G., Lang D., Holtorf H., Brownlee C., et al. (2008). A PIIB-type Ca2+-ATPase is essential for stress adaptation in Physcomitrella patens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 19555–19560 10.1073/pnas.0800864105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Raju T. S., Briggs J. B., Borge S. M., Jones A. J. S. (2000). Species-specific variation in glycosylation of IgG: evidence for the species-specific sialylation and branch-specific galactosylation and importance for engineering recombinant glycoprotein therapeutics. Glycobiology 10 477–486 10.1093/glycob/10.5.477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rensing S. A., Lang D., Zimmer A. D., Terry A., Salamov A., Shapiro H., et al. (2008). The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319 64–69 10.1126/science.1150646 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Reski R., Reynolds S., Wehe M., Kleber-Janke T., Kruse S. (1998). Moss (Physcomitrella patens) expressed sequence tags include several sequences which are novel for plants. Bot. Acta 111 143–149 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1998.tb00689.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Reutter K., Reski R. (1996). Production of a heterologous protein in bioreactor cultures of fully differentiated moss plants. Plant Tissue Cult. Biotechnol. 2 142–147 [Google Scholar]
  70. Rother S., Hadeler B., Orsini J. M., Abel W. O., Reski R. (1994). Fate of a mutant macrochloroplast in somatic hybrids. J. Plant Physiol. 143 72–77 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)82099-7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sakakibara K., Ando S., Yip H. K., Tamada Y., Hiwatashi Y., Murata T., et al. (2013). KNOX2 genes regulate the haploid-to-diploid morphological transition in land plants. Science 339 1067–1070 10.1126/science.1230082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schaaf A., Reski R., Decker E. L. (2004). A novel aspartic proteinase is targeted to the secretory pathway and to the vacuole in the moss Physcomitrella patens. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 83 145–152 10.1078/0171-9335-00371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Schaaf A., Tintelnot S., Baur A., Reski R., Gorr G., Decker E. L. (2005). Use of endogenous signal sequences for transient production and efficient secretion by moss (Physcomitrella patens) cells. BMC Biotechnol. 5:30 10.1186/1472-6750-5-30 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schaefer D. G. (2001). Gene targeting in Physcomitrella patens. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 4 143–150 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00150-153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schellekens H. (2002). Bioequivalence and the immunogenicity of biopharmaceuticals. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1 457–462 10.1038/nrd818 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Schillberg S., Raven N., Fischer R., Twyman R. M., Schiermeyer A. (2013). Molecular farming of pharmaceutical proteins using plant suspension cell and tissue cultures. Curr. Pharm. Des. 19 5531–5542 10.2174/1381612811319310008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Schmidt F. R. (2004). Recombinant expression systems in the pharmaceutical industry. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 65 363–372 10.1007/s00253-004-1656-1659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schulte J., Reski R. (2004). High throughput cryopreservation of 140,000 Physcomitrella patens mutants. Plant Biol. 6 119–127 10.1055/s-2004-817796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Schuster M., Jost W., Mudde G. C., Wiederkum S., Schwager C., Janzek E., et al. (2007). In vivo glyco-engineered antibody with improved lytic potential produced by an innovative non-mammalian expression system. Biotechnol. J. 2 700–708 10.1002/biot.200600255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Shaaltiel Y., Bartfeld D., Hashmueli S., Baum G., Brill-Almon E., Galili G., et al. (2007). Production of glucocerebrosidase with terminal mannose glycans for enzyme replacement therapy of Gaucher’s disease using a plant cell system. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5 579–590 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00263.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shields R. L., Lai J., Keck R., O’Connell L. Y., Hong K., Meng Y. G., et al. (2002). Lack of fucose on human IgG1 N-linked oligosaccharide improves binding to human FcγRIII and antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 277 26733–26740 10.1074/jbc.M202069200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Shimizu M., Igasaki T., Yamada M., Yuasa K., Hasegawa J., Kato T., et al. (2005). Experimental determination of proline hydroxylation and hydroxyproline arabinogalactosylation motifs in secretory proteins. Plant J. 42 877–889 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02419.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Shinkawa T., Nakamura K., Yamane N., Shoji-Hosaka E., Kanda Y., Sakurada M., et al. (2003). The absence of fucose but not the presence of galactose or bisecting N-acetylglucosamine of human IgG1 complex-type oligosaccharides shows the critical role of enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. J. Biol. Chem. 278 3466–3473 10.1074/jbc.M210665200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Showalter A. M. (2001). Arabinogalactan-proteins: structure, expression and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 58 1399–1417 10.1007/PL00000784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Strasser R., Altmann F., Mach L., Glössl J., Steinkellner H. (2004). Generation of Arabidopsis thaliana plants with complex N-glycans lacking β1,2-linked xylose and core α1,3-linked fucose. FEBS Lett. 561 132–136 10.1016/S0014-5793(04)00150-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Strasser R., Bondili J. S., Vavra U., Schoberer J., Svoboda B., Glössl J., et al. (2007). A unique β1,3-galactosyltransferase is indispensable for the biosynthesis of N-glycans containing Lewis A structures in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Online 19 2278–2292 10.1105/tpc.107.052985 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Strepp R., Scholz S., Kruse S., Speth V., Reski R. (1998). Plant nuclear gene knockout reveals a role in plastid division for the homolog of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ, an ancestral tubulin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 4368–4373 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Strotbek C., Krinninger S., Frank W. (2013). The moss Physcomitrella patens: methods and tools from cultivation to targeted analysis of gene function. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 57 553–564 10.1387/ijdb.130189wf [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Tan L., Leykam J. F., Kieliszewski M. J. (2003). Glycosylation motifs that direct arabinogalactan addition to arabinogalactan-proteins. Plant Physiol. 132 1362–1369 10.1104/pp.103.021766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. van Ree R., Cabanes-Macheteau M., Akkerdaas J., Milazzo J.-P., Loutelier-Bourhis C., Rayon C., et al. (2000). β(1,2)-xylose and α(1,3)-fucose residues have a strong contribution in IgE binding to plant glycoallergens. J. Biol. Chem. 275 11451–11458 10.1074/jbc.275.15.11451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Varki A., Cummings R. D., Esko J. D., Freeze H. H., Stanley P., Bertozzi C. R., et al. (2009). Essentials of Glycobiology 2nd Edn. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Velasquez S. M., Ricardi M. M., Dorosz J. G., Fernandez P. V., Nadra A. D., Pol-Fachin L., et al. (2011). O-glycosylated cell wall proteins are essential in root hair growth. Science 332 1401–1403 10.1126/science.1206657 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Viëtor R., Loutelier-Bourhis C., Fitchette A.-C., Margerie P., Gonneau M., Faye L., et al. (2003). Protein N-glycosylation is similar in the moss Physcomitrella patens and in higher plants. Planta 218 269–275 10.1007/s00425-003-1099-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Walsh G. (2010a). Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2010. Nat. Biotechnol. 28 917–924 10.1038/nbt0910-917 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Walsh G. (2010b). Post-translational modifications of protein biopharmaceuticals. Drug Discov. Today 15 773–780 10.1016/j.drudis.2010.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Walsh G., Jefferis R. (2006). Post-translational modifications in the context of therapeutic proteins. Nat. Biotechnol. 24 1241–1252 10.1038/nbt1252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Weise A., Altmann F., Rodriguez-Franco M., Sjoberg E. R., Bäumer W., Launhardt H., et al. (2007). High-level expression of secreted complex glycosylated recombinant human erythropoietin in the Physcomitrella Δ-fuc-t Δ-xyl-t mutant. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5 389–401 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00248.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Weise A., Rodriguez-Franco M., Timm B., Hermann M., Link S., Jost W., et al. (2006). Use of Physcomitrella patens actin 5′ regions for high transgene expression: importance of 5′ introns. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 70 337–345 10.1007/s00253-005-0087-86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Westphal S., Kolarich D., Foetisch K., Lauer I., Altmann F., Conti A., et al. (2003). Molecular characterization and allergenic activity of Lyc e 2 (β-fructofuranosidase), a glycosylated allergen of tomato. Eur. J. Biochem. 270 1327–1337 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03503.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Wilson I. B. H. (2001). Identification of a cDNA encoding a plant Lewis-type α1,4-fucosyltransferase. Glycoconj. J. 18 439–447 10.1023/A:1016030000527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Wilson I. B. H. (2002). Glycosylation of proteins in plants and invertebrates. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12 569–577 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00367-366 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Wilson I. B. H., Zeleny R., Kolarich D., Staudacher E., Stroop C. J. M., Kamerling J. P., et al. (2001). Analysis of Asn-linked glycans from vegetable foodstuffs: widespread occurrence of Lewis A, core α1,3-linked fucose and xylose substitutions. Glycobiology 11 261–274 10.1093/glycob/11.4.261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Xu X., Nagarajan H., Lewis N. E., Pan S., Cai Z., Liu X., et al. (2011). The genomic sequence of the Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell line. Nat. Biotechnol. 29 735–741 10.1038/nbt.1932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Yang Z., Bennett E. P., Jørgensen B., Drew D. P., Arigi E., Mandel U., et al. (2012). Toward stable genetic engineering of human O-glycosylation in plants. Plant Physiol. 160 450–463 10.1104/pp.112.198200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhang K., Baeckström D., Hansson G. C. (1994). A secreted mucin carrying Sialyl–Lewis A from colon carcinoma cells binds to E-selectin and inhibits HL-60 cell adhesion. Int. J. Cancer 59 823–829 10.1002/ijc.2910590619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Zimmer A. D., Lang D., Buchta K., Rombauts S., Nishiyama T., Hasebe M., et al. (2013). Reannotation and extended community resources for the genome of the non-seed plant Physcomitrella patens provide insights into the evolution of plant gene structures and functions. BMC Genomics 14:498 10.1186/1471-2164-14-498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Plant Science are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES