Skip to main content
Nature Portfolio logoLink to Nature Portfolio
. 2012 May 15;2(2):177–180. doi: 10.1038/kisup.2012.18

Chapter 5: Minimal-change disease in adults

PMCID: PMC4089636  PMID: 25018930

INTRODUCTION

This chapter makes treatment recommendations for adults with MCD. The cost implications for global application of this guideline are addressed in Chapter 2.

  • 5.1: Treatment of initial episode of adult MCD
    • 5.1.1: We recommend that corticosteroids be given for initial treatment of nephrotic syndrome. (1C)
    • 5.1.2: We suggest prednisone or prednisolone* be given at a daily single dose of 1 mg/kg (maximum 80 mg) or alternate-day single dose of 2 mg/kg (maximum 120 mg). (2C)
    • 5.1.3: We suggest the initial high dose of corticosteroids, if tolerated, be maintained for a minimum period of 4 weeks if complete remission is achieved, and for a maximum period of 16 weeks if complete remission is not achieved. (2C)
    • 5.1.4: In patients who remit, we suggest that corticosteroids be tapered slowly over a total period of up to 6 months after achieving remission. (2D)
    • 5.1.5: For patients with relative contraindications or intolerance to high-dose corticosteroids (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, psychiatric conditions, severe osteoporosis), we suggest oral cyclophosphamide or CNIs as discussed in frequently relapsing MCD. (2D)
    • 5.1.6: We suggest using the same initial dose and duration of corticosteroids for infrequent relapses as in Recommendations 5.1.2, 5.1.3, and 5.1.4. (2D)

*Prednisone and prednisolone are equivalent, used in the same dosage, and have both been used in RCTs depending on the country of origin. All later references to prednisone in this chapter refer to prednisone or prednisolone. All later references to oral corticosteroids refer to prednisone or prednisolone.

BACKGROUND

MCD refers to the occurrence of nephrotic syndrome with no glomerular lesions by light microscopy (or only minimal mesangial prominence), no staining on immunofluorescence microscopy (or low-intensity staining for C3 and IgM), and foot process effacement but no electron-dense deposits on electron microscopy.121

Although spontaneous remission can occur in MCD,122, 123, 124, 125 untreated nephrotic syndrome is associated with significant morbidity due to accelerated atherosclerosis, in part due to dyslipidemia,126 infections,125, 127 and thromboembolic events.128 Therefore, specific treatment should be given with the goal of achieving remission. The cornerstone of treatment has been corticosteroids. MCD in children is exquisitely sensitive to corticosteroids; however, adults tend to respond more slowly, with responses occurring as late as 3–4 months after starting therapy. The response to corticosteroids is also less predictable in adults, as only about 75% of adults with MCD are steroid-responsive (Table 8). Also, in contrast to children, there is a paucity of well-designed RCTs investigating the treatment of MCD in adults.

Table 8. Dosage regimens in MCD.

Drug and dosing scheme
Initial treatment
Prednisone
Daily single dose of 1 mg/kg (maximum 80 mg) or alternate-day single dose of 2 mg/kg (maximum 120 mg)
 –until complete remission (minimum 4 weeks to a maximum of 16 weeks)
 –after complete remission, tapered slowly over 6 months
 
FR or SD MCD
1. Cyclophosphamide (oral) single course
  2–2.5 mg/kg/d as tolerated for 8 weeks
2. Relapsed despite cyclophosphamide, or patients of childbearing age
  a. Cyclosporine starting dose 3–5 mg/kg/d (in two equally divided doses)
  b. Tacrolimus 0.05–0.1 mg/kg/d (in two equally divided doses)
   Following 3 months of stable remission, tapered to reach the minimum dosage that maintains remission, for 1–2 years
3. Intolerant to corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and/or CNIs
  a. Mycophenolate mofetil 500–1000 mg twice daily for 1–2 years

FR, frequently relapsing; MCD, minimal-change disease; SD, steroid-dependent.

Although AKI is common in adults with MCD (up to 20–25%),129, 130 progressive CKD is not part of the natural history of adults with MCD, and its occurrence suggests underlying FSGS.

More than half of adult MCD patients will experience relapses, and up to a third of patients may become frequent relapsers or corticosteroid-dependent.130, 131, 132, 133 Furthermore, a 40% relapse rate has been reported in adults who had MCD as children,16 and these patients continue to relapse. Secondary etiologies associated with MCD are uncommon, but should be considered. They include Hodgkin's disease, lithium therapy, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.134

Corticosteroids are generally well-tolerated, but drug-related adverse effects are common with prolonged/repeated courses in SD or FR patients.

Disease Definitions

Definitions of proteinuria outcomes are as listed in Table 10, Chapter 6. Partial remissions in proteinuria are not seen in MCD.

RATIONALE

  • There is only low-quality evidence to recommend corticosteroids in the treatment of adult MCD. This recommendation is based largely on extrapolation from RCTs in children, as well as small RCTs and observational studies in adults.

  • There is only low-quality evidence to define the optimal dose and duration of corticosteroids in adults, but a high dose until remission is achieved followed by a slow taper to minimize relapse is usually prescribed.

  • There is very low–quality evidence suggesting that alternate-day is equivalent to daily corticosteroids in adult MCD.

  • MCD in adults may take a longer time to remit compared to MCD in children.

 Corticosteroids have been studied in several large prospective RCTs in children99,135 and observational studies in children and adults.129, 130, 131, 132, 133 In a very early multicenter controlled study of corticosteroids compared to no treatment in 125 nephrotic adults (including 31 MCD patients defined by light microscopy alone), those treated with at least 20 mg/d prednisone for at least 6 months showed an early and rapid decrease in proteinuria compared to the control group. However, by two and a half years, there was no difference in proteinuria or serum albumin in the two groups.123 Similarly, in one small RCT of 28 adult MCD patients that compared prednisone 125 mg every other day for 2 months with placebo, there was no difference in overall remission rates over 77 months follow-up, although a significant percentage of the placebo arm ended up being treated with prednisone over this time frame. However, patients treated with prednisone went into remission more rapidly; 12 of 14 treated patients were in complete remission before 2 months, compared to 6 of 14 controls.124, 136

Although there are no controlled trials comparing daily vs. alternate-day corticosteroids in adults, observational studies have not shown any difference in response rates.130 Corticosteroid therapy leads to complete remission in over 80% of adults with MCD. The time course to a complete remission is delayed compared to children, with 50% responding by 4 weeks but the remaining 10–25% requiring 12–16 weeks of therapy.129, 130 It is known that, in children, 6 months of corticosteroid treatment is associated with a lower relapse rate than 3 months of therapy.135 The optimal method to taper corticosteroids in adults is not known, but corticosteroids are commonly tapered by 5–10 mg/wk or less after achieving remission, for a total period of corticosteroid exposure of at least 24 weeks.125, 129, 130

Only a few patients have been treated at the time of initial presentation with steroid-free regimens (e.g., cyclophosphamide132, 137, 138 or cyclosporine139). In this very limited experience, the typical response rate of 75% is comparable to corticosteroids.

For infrequent relapses, repeat courses of corticosteroids may be used as in the first episode of MCD. There are no RCTs to guide the therapy of relapse in adult MCD. Reinstitution of prednisone usually results in a remission.

  • 5.2: FR/SD MCD
    • 5.2.1: We suggest oral cyclophosphamide 2–2.5 mg/kg/d for 8 weeks. (2C)
    • 5.2.2: We suggest CNI (cyclosporine 3–5 mg/kg/d or tacrolimus 0.05-0.1 mg/kg/d in divided doses) for 1–2 years for FR/SD MCD patients who have relapsed despite cyclophosphamide, or for people who wish to preserve their fertility. (2C)
    • 5.2.3: We suggest MMF 500–1000 mg twice daily for 1–2 years for patients who are intolerant of corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and CNIs. (2D)

RATIONALE

  • There is low-quality evidence to suggest the value of alkylating agents in adult FR/SD MCD. Support for this approach comes from RCTs in children, and observational studies in adults.

  • There is low-quality evidence to suggest that CNIs can induce complete or partial remission in adult MCD, but relapse rates may be higher than with alkylating agents after cessation of CNIs.

  • There is very low–quality evidence to suggest the use of MMF as a corticosteroid or CNI-sparing agent.

 In observational studies, treatment with cyclophosphamide leads to remission in a significant number of adults.129, 130, 132 The relapse-free interval appears to be longer than with cyclosporine (see below). In an observational study, the initial response rates with cyclophosphamide in SD adults appeared excellent (all nine patients were able to be weaned off steroids in one study);129 however, five of these patients relapsed. In this study FR MCD patients appeared to fare better than SD MCD, with 80% of patients showing sustained remission at a mean follow-up of 9.1 years. Similarly, SD children may be less responsive to cyclophosphamide than frequent relapsers.43 In another study, 21 of 36 adults with FR/SD MCD attained remission within 8 weeks and four more patients (total of 25/31 or 69%) within 16 weeks. The addition of prednisone to cyclophosphamide did not appear to provide added benefit. Remissions appeared to be more durable with cyclophosphamide compared to steroids.132 In another study, 55% of 20 patients treated with cyclophosphamide (for FR or SD MCD) had a complete or partial remission.130 There is one report of the effectiveness of regimens using i.v. cyclophosphamide in adults.140

Many observational studies have reported the efficacy of cyclosporine with remission rates of 70-90%.130, 141 In an RCT of 73 adults and children with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome (31 with MCD; 42 with FSGS), treatment was given with either cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/d) for 8 weeks or cyclosporine (5 mg/kg/d) for 9 months, followed by a 3-month taper to withdrawal. At 9 months, remission rate did not differ significantly: 64% (18/28) of patients on cyclophosphamide and 74% (26/35) of patients on cyclosporine maintained remission. However, at 2 years, 25% of patients assigned to cyclosporine vs. 63% of patients assigned to cyclophosphamide were still in remission.62 Another RCT of 52 patients noted that remission was achieved sooner in patients treated with cyclosporine plus 0.8 mg/kg/d prednisone compared to patients receiving only 1 mg/kg/d prednisone, suggesting an additional benefit of lower exposure to corticosteroids (Online Suppl Tables 20, 21).142

The optimal dose and duration of cyclosporine therapy is unknown. In an RCT of adults and children with FR/SD nephrotic syndrome, cyclosporine was dosed at 5 mg/kg/d for 9 months followed by a taper over 3 months.62 The possibility of cyclosporine dependency is high when treatment is abruptly stopped after achieving complete remission. However, prolonged treatment in 36 adult patients for a mean of 26 months, followed by slow withdrawal, led to sustained remissions without steroids in 11 of 14 patients and with low doses of corticosteroids in three patients. In 20% of patients, who remained cyclosporine-dependent, doses of <3 mg/kg/d were sufficient to maintain remission. The cumulative rate of remissions appears to reach a plateau by 6 months.143, 144

Tacrolimus, administered for 24 weeks was compared to i.v. cyclophosphamide in a small RCT in SD patients with achieved response rates similar to cyclosporine. All patients in this study were able to discontinue corticosteroids.140

There are insufficient data to suggest a therapeutic level for CNI in adult MCD patients. After starting the drug with the suggested dosing regimen in Table 8 and achieving remission, the CNI dose should be progressively reduced to the lowest level that will maintain the remission. Many patients will be able to come off corticosteroids completely140 and every effort should be made to reduce and stop corticosteroids after starting CNI.

In children with MCD, MMF has been used as a steroid-sparing agent (see Recommendation 3.3.5). The experience with MMF in adults has been limited to case reports.145, 146, 147

  • 5.3: Corticosteroid-resistant MCD
    • 5.3.1: Re-evalulate patients who are corticosteroid-resistant for other causes of nephrotic syndrome. (Not Graded)

RATIONALE

  • Corticosteroid-resistant MCD suggests FSGS.

An estimated 10% of adult MCD patients are steroid-resistant (failed 16 weeks of daily or alternate-day corticosteroids as outlined previously). Steroid resistance may be due to undetected FSGS (which may not be seen in a biopsy specimen because it is a focal lesion). A repeat biopsy could be considered and may show FSGS, which is associated with a worse prognosis than MCD. There are no RCTs and very few observational data on treatment strategies of steroid-resistant MCD in adults. Treatment strategy as outlined in Chapter 6 is suggested.

  • 5.4: Supportive therapy
    • 5.4.1: We suggest that MCD patients who have AKI be treated with renal replacement therapy as indicated, but together with corticosteroids, as for a first episode of MCD. (2D)
    • 5.4.2: We suggest that, for the initial episode of nephrotic syndrome associated with MCD, statins not be used to treat hyperlipidemia, and ACE-I or ARBs not be used in normotensive patients to lower proteinuria. (2D)

RATIONALE

  • AKI may accompany MCD in adults. This is usually reversible with continued steroid therapy. Supportive care, including renal replacement therapy, may be temporarily required. Proteinuria in adult MCD will typically remit with corticosteroids. As a consequence, the accompanying hyperlipidemia will remit with resolution of proteinuria, negating the need for statin therapy.

  • Proteinuria in adult MCD will typically remit with corticosteroids, and statins and RAS blockade to help reduce proteinuria are not necessary if early remission is achieved.

 AKI, sometimes severe enough to require dialysis, can occur in patients with MCD. Risk factors include older age, hypertension, severe nephrotic syndrome, and underlying arteriosclerosis of the kidney.130, 148 Kidney function typically recovers even in the most severely affected patients, although patients who have experienced kidney failure may have residual chronic renal impairment.130 Careful attention to volume status, as well as continued therapy with corticosteroids, and other supportive therapy for AKI are suggested.

There is only one small study of 40 adults who had relapsing nephrotic syndrome as children. This study did not show a higher incidence of cardiovascular disease, implying that long-term cardiovascular risk was not increased by intermittent hyperlipidemia during nephrotic relapses in childhood.149 The use of antihyperlipidemic agents and ACE-I or ARBs may be considered on a case-by-case basis in FR/SD MCD adults in whom rapid remission is not achieved. It is important to note that adding an ACE-I or ARB in a severely nephrotic patient who is being aggressively diuresed may precipitate AKI.150

Economic Considerations

Prednisone and cyclophosphamide are less costly than CNIs and MMF. Cost factors need to be considered in patients who are not able to afford or access the more expensive medications.151 The addition of ketoconazole is safe and can lead to significant reduction in costs associated with CNIs, but drug levels need to be assessed to avoid nephrotoxicity.73

RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS

  • RCTs should investigate the use of CNIs or MMF as alternatives to corticosteroids for the first episode of adult MCD.

  • RCTs are needed to compare CNIs to cyclophosphamide in FR/SD MCD, and to establish if cyclosporine or tacrolimus should be the preferred CNI.

  • RCTs are needed to study the role of rituximab in FR/SD MCD.

  • RCTs are needed to study the role of levamisole in FR/SD MCD.

  • Evidence should be collected in these RCTs to evaluate the long-term cardiovascular, metabolic, infectious, and bone risk of FR/SD MCD, and corresponding treatment.

DISCLAIMER

While every effort is made by the publishers, editorial board, and ISN to see that no inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement appears in this Journal, they wish to make it clear that the data and opinions appearing in the articles and advertisements herein are the responsibility of the contributor, copyright holder, or advertiser concerned. Accordingly, the publishers and the ISN, the editorial board and their respective employers, office and agents accept no liability whatsoever for the consequences of any such inaccurate or misleading data, opinion or statement. While every effort is made to ensure that drug doses and other quantities are presented accurately, readers are advised that new methods and techniques involving drug usage, and described within this Journal, should only be followed in conjunction with the drug manufacturer′s own published literature.

Footnotes

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL

Supplementary Table 20: Summary table of RCT examining CsA vs. steroid treatment after first relapse in adults with minimal change disease (categorical outcomes).

Supplementary Table 21: Summary table of RCT examining CsA vs. steroid treatment after first relapse in adults with minimal change disease (continuous outcomes).

Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at http://www.kdigo.org/clinical_practice_guidelines/GN.php

Supplementary Material

References

  1. Fakhouri F, Bocquet N, Taupin P, et al. Steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: from childhood to adulthood. Am J Kidney Dis. 2003;41:550–557. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2003.50116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Latta K, von Schnakenburg C, Ehrich JH. A meta-analysis of cytotoxic treatment for frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2001;16:271–282. doi: 10.1007/s004670000523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ponticelli C, Edefonti A, Ghio L, et al. Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1993;8:1326–1332. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. El-Husseini A, El-Basuony F, Mahmoud I, et al. Impact of the cyclosporine-ketoconazole interaction in children with steroid-dependent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2006;62:3–8. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0064-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gipson DS, Massengill SF, Yao L, et al. Management of childhood onset nephrotic syndrome. Pediatrics. 2009;124:747–757. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nachman PH, Jennette JC, Falk RJ.Primary glomerular diseasesIn: Brenner BM (ed).Brenner and Rector's The Kidney8th edn.Saunders/Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA; 2008987–1066. [Google Scholar]
  7. Arneil GC, Lam CN. Long-term assessment of steroid therapy in childhood nephrosis. Lancet. 1966;2:819–821. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(66)92253-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Black DA, Rose G, Brewer DB. Controlled trial of prednisone in adult patients with the nephrotic syndrome. Br Med J. 1970;3:421–426. doi: 10.1136/bmj.3.5720.421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Coggins CH. Adult minimal change nephropathy: experience of the collaborative study of glomerular disease. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1986;97:18–26. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Huang JJ, Hsu SC, Chen FF, et al. Adult-onset minimal change disease among Taiwanese: clinical features, therapeutic response, and prognosis. Am J Nephrol. 2001;21:28–34. doi: 10.1159/000046215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Radhakrishnan J, Appel AS, Valeri A, et al. The nephrotic syndrome, lipids, and risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 1993;22:135–142. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)70179-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. McIntyre P, Craig JC. Prevention of serious bacterial infection in children with nephrotic syndrome. J Paediatr Child Health. 1998;34:314–317. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.1998.00232.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Mahmoodi BK, ten Kate MK, Waanders F, et al. High absolute risks and predictors of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with nephrotic syndrome: results from a large retrospective cohort study. Circulation. 2008;117:224–230. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.716951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mak SK, Short CD, Mallick NP. Long-term outcome of adult-onset minimal-change nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:2192–2201. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Waldman M, Crew RJ, Valeri A, et al. Adult minimal-change disease: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;2:445–453. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03531006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Lewis EJ. Minimal-change glomerulopathy of adulthood. Am J Nephrol. 1988;8:291–297. doi: 10.1159/000167603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nolasco F, Cameron JS, Heywood EF, et al. Adult-onset minimal change nephrotic syndrome: a long-term follow-up. Kidney Int. 1986;29:1215–1223. doi: 10.1038/ki.1986.130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tse KC, Lam MF, Yip PS, et al. Idiopathic minimal change nephrotic syndrome in older adults: steroid responsiveness and pattern of relapses. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:1316–1320. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Appel GB, Radhakrishnan J, d'Agati V.Secondary glomerular diseasesIn: Brenner BM (ed).Brenner and Rector's The Kidney8th edn.Saunders/Elsevier: Philadelphia, PA; 2008,1067–1146. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hodson EM, Willis NS, Craig JC.Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007. CD001533. [DOI] [PubMed]
  21. Palmer SC, Nand K, Strippoli GF.Interventions for minimal change disease in adults with nephrotic syndrome Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008. CD001537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  22. Al-Khader AA, Lien JW, Aber GM. Cyclophosphamide alone in the treatment of adult patients with minimal change glomerulonephritis. Clin Nephrol. 1979;11:26–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Uldall PR, Feest TG, Morley AR, et al. Cyclophosphamide therapy in adults with minimal-change nephrotic syndrome. Lancet. 1972;1:1250–1253. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(72)90978-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Matsumoto H, Nakao T, Okada T, et al. Favorable outcome of low-dose cyclosporine after pulse methylprednisolone in Japanese adult minimal-change nephrotic syndrome. Intern Med. 2004;43:668–673. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li X, Li H, Chen J, et al. Tacrolimus as a steroid-sparing agent for adults with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2008;23:1919–1925. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Meyrier A, Condamin MC, Broneer D. Treatment of adult idiopathic nephrotic syndrome with cyclosporin A: minimal-change disease and focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis. Collaborative Group of the French Society of Nephrology. Clin Nephrol. 1991;35 (Suppl 1:S37–S42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Eguchi A, Takei T, Yoshida T, et al. Combined cyclosporine and prednisolone therapy in adult patients with the first relapse of minimal-change nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:124–129. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meyrier A, Niaudet P, Brodehl J. Optimal use of Sandimmun in Nephrotic Syndrome. Springer: Berlin, Germany; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  29. Meyrier A, Noel LH, Auriche P, et al. Long-term renal tolerance of cyclosporin A treatment in adult idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Collaborative Group of the Societe de Nephrologie. Kidney Int. 1994;45:1446–1456. doi: 10.1038/ki.1994.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Choi MJ, Eustace JA, Gimenez LF, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil treatment for primary glomerular diseases. Kidney Int. 2002;61:1098–1114. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00214.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fujinaga S, Ohtomo Y, Hirano D, et al. Mycophenolate mofetil therapy for childhood-onset steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome after long-term cyclosporine: extended experience in a single center. Clin Nephrol. 2009;72:268–273. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Siu YP, Tong MK, Leung K, et al. The use of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in the treatment of relapsing and steroid-dependent minimal change disease. J Nephrol. 2008;21:127–131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jennette JC, Falk RJ. Adult minimal change glomerulopathy with acute renal failure. Am J Kidney Dis. 1990;16:432–437. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80055-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Lechner BL, Bockenhauer D, Iragorri S, et al. The risk of cardiovascular disease in adults who have had childhood nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19:744–748. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1460-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Yalavarthy R, Smith ML, Edelstein C. Acute kidney injury complicating minimal change disease: the case for careful use of diuretics and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Nephrology (Carlton) 2007;12:529–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2007.00820.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Colquitt JL, Kirby J, Green C, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treatments for children with idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review Health Technol Assess 200711iii–iiv.ix–xi, 1–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Kidney International Supplements are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES