Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Cardiol. 2014 May 6;114(2):206–213. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.04.044

Temporal Trends in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Associated Acute Cerebrovascular Accident (From the 1998–2008 Nationwide Inpatient Sample [NIS] Database)

Anupama Shivaraju a, Changhong Yu b, Michael W Kattan b, Hui Xie c, Adhir R Shroff a, Mladen I Vidovich a
PMCID: PMC4089901  NIHMSID: NIHMS593743  PMID: 24952927

Abstract

Acute cerebrovascular accident (CVA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998 to 2008 was utilized to identify 1,552,602 PCIs performed for ACS and CAD. We assessed temporal trends in the incidence, predictors and prognostic impact of CVA in a broad range of patients undergoing PCI. The overall incidence of CVA was 0.56% (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55%–0.57%). The incidence of CVA remained unchanged over the study period (adjusted p for trend = 0.2271). The overall mortality in the CVA group was 10.76% (95% CI, 10.1%–11.4%). The adjusted odds ratio (OR) of CVA for in-hospital mortality was 7.74 (95% CI, 7.00–8.57; p<0.0001); this remained high but decreased over the study period (adjusted p for trend <0.0001). Independent predictors of CVA included older age (OR, 1.03, 95% CI, 1.02–1.03; p<0.0001), disorder of lipid metabolism (OR, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.24–1.38; p<0.001), history of tobacco use (OR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10–1.34; p=0.0002), coronary atherosclerosis (OR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.43–1.71; p<0.0001), and IABP use (OR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.09–1.77; p=0.0073). A nomogram for predicting the probability of CVA achieved a concordance index of 0.73 and was well calibrated. In conclusion, the incidence of CVA associated with PCI has remained unchanged from 1998–2008 in face of improved equipment, techniques and adjunctive pharmacology. The risk of CVA associated in-hospital mortality is high; however, this risk has declined over the study period.

Keywords: Acute Cerebral Hemorrhage, Acute Cerebral Infarction, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

INTRODUCTION

The field of interventional cardiology has advanced tremendously since the advent of coronary angioplasty in 1977. Despite improvements in techniques, equipment and adjunctive pharmacology, acute cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains one of the most devastating adverse complications with high rates of mortality and morbidity (14). The incidence of CVA in patients undergoing PCI ranges from 0.07% to 1.4% (38). Patients with CVA complications after PCI have a markedly high in-hospital mortality rate in the range of 10% to 37% (3,6,911). The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) database encompasses an extensive collection of longitudinal hospital care data in the United States; this enables research on a broad range of health care policy issues. The purpose of this study was to assess the temporal trends in the incidence, predictors and prognostic impact of CVA in a broad range of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI from 1998 to 2008, and to build a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of CVA with available patient profile information. The data in this study is a representation of real-world clinical practice in the United States (US) in the last decade.

METHODS

The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) is the largest all-payer US inpatient care database that contains over a hundred clinical and nonclinical data elements from approximately 8 million hospital stays each year. From 1998 to 2008, a total of 1,552,602 PCI procedures performed in patients for symptomatic CAD and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnoses, which encompass ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), were identified. The Clinical Classifications Software (CCS) developed by HCUP was used in analyzing our dependent and independent variables. CVA was defined as any new focal neurological deficit lasting ≥ 24 h and transient cerebral ischemia as any new deficits lasting < 24 h. The specific single-level CCS diagnosis categories used to define CVA in this study were “109 – Acute Cerebrovascular Disease and 112 – Transient Cerebral Ischemia.” The subtypes of CVA were defined as following: “Hemorrhagic CVA – ICD-9 codes 430, 431, and 432; Ischemic CVA – ICD-9 codes 433 and 434; and, Transient Cerebral Ischemia – CCS code 112.” CVA was the dependent variable. Additional data on covariates were collected and are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline patient characteristics

CVA

Variable No
(N= 1,543,858)
Yes
(N= 8,744)
p-Value
Age, mean ± SD (years) 64 ± 12 70 ± 12 < 0.0001
Women 34.1 % 47.6 % < 0.0001
White 81.9 % 79.0 %
Black 6.7 % 9.2 %
Hispanic 6.1 % 6.9 % < 0.0001
Asian 1.7 % 1.7 %
Native American 0.4 % 0.3 %
Other 3.2 % 2.9 %
Died during hospitalization, total 11,798 (0.8 %) 939 (10.8 %) < 0.0001
Length of stay, mean ± SD (days) 2.8 ± 3.1 7.9 ± 8.0 < 0.0001
Total charge, mean ± SD ($) 39,952 ± 29948 68,516 ± 63381 < 0.0001

Hypertension 975,346 (63.2 %) 5,623 (64.3 %) 0.0288
Dyslipidemia 839,967 (54.4 %) 3,434 (39.3 %) <0.0001
Diabetes Mellitus 445,889 (28.9 %) 2,683 (30.7 %) 0.0002
Chronic Renal Failure 44,201 (2.9 %) 448 (5.1 %) < 0.0001
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Bronchiectasis 150,545 (9.8 %) 1,254 (14.3 %) < 0.0001
Pulmonary Heart Disease 21,603 (1.4 %) 200 (2.3 %) < 0.0001
Tobacco Use Disorder 259,563 (16.8 %) 974 (11.1 %) < 0.0001
History of Tobacco Use 148,677 (9.6 %) 543 (6.2 %) < 0.0001
Peripheral and Visceral Atherosclerosis 104,620 (6.8 %) 942 (10.8 %) < 0.0001
Occlusion or Stenosis of Precerebral Arteries 22,879 (1.5 %) 637 (7.3 %) < 0.0001
Other and Ill-defined cerebrovascular disease 3,152 (0.2 %) 137 (1.6 %) < 0.0001
Congestive Heart Failure 171,936 (11.1 %) 2,131 (24.4 %) < 0.0001
Heart Valve Disorders 109,748 (7.1 %) 1,050 (12.0 %) < 0.0001
Aortic Valve Disorder 7,695 (0.5 %) 145 (1.7 %) <0.0001
Acute Myocardial Infarct 531,130 (34.4 %) 4,471 (51.1 %) < 0.0001
Coronary Atherosclerosis and other Heart 1,484,506 (96.2 %) 7,644 (87.4 %) < 0.0001
Disease
Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter 121,235 (7.9 %) 1,609 (18.4 %) < 0.0001
Peri- endo- and myocarditis, Cardiomyopathy 45,167 (2.9 %) 432 (4.9 %) < 0.0001
Aortic/peripheral/visceral artery aneurysm, embolism or thrombosis 23,296 (1.5 %) 233 (2.7 %) < 0.0001
Cardiac and circulatory congenital anomalies 4,264 (0.3 %) 64 (0.7 %) < 0.0001
Shock 13,574 (0.9 %) 361 (4.1 %) < 0.0001
Malignancy, Any 95,696 (6.2 %) 598 (6.8 %) 0.0133
Headache, including Migraine 8,620 (0.6 %) 115 (1.3 %) < 0.0001
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus/Connective 46,831 (3.0 %) 575 (6.6 %) < 0.0001
Tissue Disease
Coagulation and Hemorrhagic Disorders 21,142 (1.4 %) 292 (3.3 %) < 0.0001
Anemia 85,394 (5.5 %) 892 (10.2 %) < 0.0001
Intra-aortic balloon pump 8,143 (0.5 %) 147 (1.7 %) < 0.0001

International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision Codes used for:

Anemia - 285.1 282.41 282.42 282.5 282.60 282.61 282.62 282.63 282.64 282.68 282.69 280.1 280.8 280.9 281.0 281.1 281.2 281.3 281.4 281.8 281.9 284.0 284.01 284.09 284.1 284.11 284.12 284.19 284.8 284.81 284.89 284.9 280.0 283.0 283.1 283.10 283.11 283.19 283.2 283.9 282.0 282.1 282.2 282.3 282.4 282.40 282.43 282.44 282.45 282.46 282.47 282.49 282.7 282.8 282.9 284.2 285.0 285.21 285.22 285.29 285.8 285.9

Disorders of lipid metabolism - 272.0 272.1 272.2 272.3 272.4

Tobacco Use Disorder - 305.1

Our primary analysis was to assess the incidence of CVA and its trend over the study period. Our secondary analysis looked at independent predictors of CVA, mortality rate in patients with CVA, and temporal trend in mortality rate in patients with CVA over the study years. In addition, we built a nomogram that predicts the likelihood of developing CVA for patients undergoing PCI with readily available demographic and clinical characteristic variables.

The study population was separated into two groups – those with CVA and without CVA. The summary statistics with baseline characteristics were generated for the entire population separated into the two groups as well as for the subpopulations stratified by the year.

All tests were 2-tailed, and a P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant for all tests. Univariate analysis was initially conducted to summarize the data. The Pearson chi-square tests were used to test for categorical variables and are presented as percentages. The nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test was employed to test for all continuous variables and is presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Logistic regressions were fit to the data to evaluate the trend for incidence of CVA over the years 1998 to 2008. The Wald test was used to test the null hypothesis of no trend. The logistic regression model was then used to assess predictors of CVA after adjusting for the observed baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. The logistic regression model was also used to investigate the trends for incidence of in-hospital mortality with and without CVA as well as to assess the trends for the adjusted and unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for the association between death and CVA over the study years. We used the propensity-score method to evaluate the association between CVA and the mortality rate. Propensity scores were estimated using a logistic regression model with CVA as the outcome and all the observed baseline demographic and clinical characteristic variables. We used the method of regression adjustment by the estimated propensity scores to estimate the association between CVA and the mortality rate, taking into account all the other observed baseline demographic and clinical characteristic variables. Advantage of this two-step propensity score procedure is that this allows us to fit a complicated propensity score model with interactions and higher order terms for more accurate estimation of CVA probability (12).

The missing data were omitted as follows: in the No CVA group (n=1543858) age (n=36, 0.002%), length of stay (n=22, 0.001%), mean total charge (n=20721, 1.3%), female gender (n=137, 0.009%), race (n=419744, 27.2%), death (n=315, 0.02%). In the CVA group (n=8744) mean total charge (n=141, 1.6%), female gender (n=1, 0.01%), race (n=2283, 26.1%), death (n=20, 0.23%).

A multivariable logistic regression model was built to link the demographic and clinical characteristic variables with CVA, which served as the basis of the nomogram for predicting the probability of developing CVA. To relax the common modeling assumption that the association between risk factors and outcome is linear, we applied restricted cubic splines to continuous variables. The nomogram was internally validated with 1000 bootstrap resamples to objectively evaluate the predictive performance after correcting over-fit bias. First, model discrimination ability was quantified using the c-index, which is equivalent to the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC), and, ranges from 0.5 to 1, with 0.5 indicating no different from chance and 1 for perfect prediction. In addition, the agreement between the observed and the predicted outcomes was visually checked with a calibration plot.

All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) or the open source statistical package R-2.15.2 (R core team, 2012).

All authors have read and agree to the manuscript as written. The authors are solely responsible for the design and conduct of this study, all study analyses, the drafting and editing of the paper and its final contents. This study has been approved by the University of Illinois at Chicago Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

From 1998 to 2008, there were 1,552,602 PCI procedures performed for AMI and CAD diagnoses. Patients’ baseline characteristics and clinical presentation are shown in Table 1. CVA during PCI hospitalization occurred in 8744 patients (0.56%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55% – 0.57%). The overall incidence of CVA associated with PCI remained unchanged during the study period from 0.60% in 1998 to 0.66% in 2008 (p for trend =0.2308 univariate analysis, p=0.2271 multivariate analysis) (Figure 1.). Incidences of various types of CVA are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Incidence of cerebrovascular accidents from 1998 to 2008.

Table 2. Incidence of Various Types of Cerebrovascular Accident.

Acute Cerebrovascular Accidents (N=8,744)

Hemorrhagic CVA 715 (8.2 %)
Ischemic CVA 4669 (53.4 %)
Transient Cerebral Ischemia 2889 (33.0 %)

The predictors of CVA after adjusting for covariates were identified (Figure 2). Important predictors in this multivariable analysis included older age (adjusted OR, 1.03, 95% CI, 1.02–1.03; p<0.0001), disorder of lipid metabolism (OR, 1.31, 95% CI, 1.24–1.38; p<0.001), history of tobacco use (OR, 1.21, 95% CI, 1.10–1.34; p=0.0002), coronary atherosclerosis/other heart disease (OR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.43–1.71; p<0.0001), and IABP (OR 1.39, 95% CI, 1.09–1.77; p=0.0073). Female gender, DM, hypertension, CRF, AMI, CHF, aortic valve disorder, atrial fibrillation/flutter, peripheral/visceral atherosclerosis, and shock were not significant predictors for CVA in multivariable analysis. The length of stay (p<0.0001) and mean total charge (p=0.0463) were significantly higher and associated with CVA after adjusting for covariates.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Independent predictors for cerebrovascular accidents after adjusting for covariates.

The overall mortality in the CVA group was 10.8% (95% CI, 10.1%–11.4%). Patients who died were 15.66 (95% CI, 14.60–16.80; p<0.0001) times more likely to have CVA than the patients who were alive; this OR decreased to 7.74 (95% CI, 7.00–8.57; p<0.0001) after adjusting for covariates. The in-hospital mortality in patients with CVA (adjusted p for trend <0.0001) and without CVA (adjusted p for trend <0.0001) decreased from 1998 to 2008 (Figure 3A and Figure 3B, respectively). Both the adjusted and unadjusted OR for in-hospital mortality associated with CVA were high for each individual year when compared to in-hospital mortality without CVA (p<0.0001 for all years). The temporal trend of the unadjusted and adjusted OR for in-hospital mortality associated with acute CVA (p for trend = 0.0026 and <0.0001, respectively) decreased over the study period (Table 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

A Incidence of in-hospital mortality with cerebrovascular accidents from 1998 to 2008.

B Incidence of in-hospital mortality without cerebrovascular accidents from 1998 to 2008.

Table 3.

Association between Death and Cerebrovascular Accidents by Year With and Without Adjusting for Covariates

Without adjusting for covariates With adjusting for covariates*
Variable OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Overall
  Died 15.66 (14.60;16.80) < 0.0001 7.74 (7.00;8.57) < 0.0001
Individual Year
  1998 15.13 (11.77;19.43) < 0.0001 9.89 (6.93;14.10) < 0.0001
  1999 19.21 (15.34;24.06) < 0.0001 9.31 (6.70;12.92) < 0.0001
  2000 19.45 (15.64;24.19) < 0.0001 10.80 (7.76;15.03) < 0.0001
  2001 20.21 (16.32;25.01) < 0.0001 10.70 (7.86;14.56) < 0.0001
  2002 13.73 (10.76;17.52) < 0.0001 7.71 (5.46;10.89) < 0.0001
  2003 14.58 (11.34;18.74) < 0.0001 9.10 (6.39;12.96) < 0.0001
  2004 13.91 (10.84;17.85) < 0.0001 6.26 (4.28;9.14) < 0.0001
  2005 14.53 (11.45;18.43) < 0.0001 6.50 (4.59;9.20) < 0.0001
  2006 17.07 (13.81;21.10) < 0.0001 8.99 (6.66;12.13) < 0.0001
  2007 15.54 (12.24;19.72) < 0.0001 6.21 (4.30;8.97) < 0.0001
  2008 10.38 (8.15;13.21) < 0.0001 4.40 (3.14;6.18) < 0.0001
*

The adjusting covariates are year, age, gender, race, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total charge of hospitalization, hypertension, disorder of lipid metabolism, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/bronchiectasis, pulmonary heart disease, tobacco use disorder, history of tobacco use, peripheral/visceral atherosclerosis, occlusion or stenosis of precerebral arteries, other/ill-defined cerebrovascular disease, congestive heart failure, heart valve disorders, aortic valve disorders, acute myocardial infarct, coronary atherosclerosis/other heart disease, atrial fibrillation/flutter, peri-/endo-/myocarditis cardiomyopathy, aortic/peripheral/visceral artery aneurysm/embolism/thrombosis, cardiac/circulatory congenital anomalies, shock, any malignancy, headache including migraine, systemic lupus erythematosus/connective tissue disease, coagulation/hemorrhagic disorders, anemia, and intra-aortic balloon pump.

Propensity matching analysis was also performed to reduce the confounding effects of baseline demographics and clinical characteristic variables. After propensity matching the association of CVA with in-hospital mortality remained statistically significant (p<0.0001).

Based on the multivariable logistic regression, a nomogram incorporating the baseline characteristics was constructed to predict the probability of CVA (Figure 4A). To use the nomogram, a patient’s profile is first located on each predictor variable scale. Each scale location has corresponding prognostic points at the top point’s axis. The points from each individual predictor scale were summed to arrive at a total point value. This value is then plotted on the total point scale (second scale from the bottom), and the corresponding probability of CVA is determined by drawing a vertical line straight down to the predicted probability of acute CVA axis. In the internal validation, the nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.73 after using bootstrapping to correct for over-fitting. Figure 4B shows the model calibration that looks reasonable for the majority of patients.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Figure 4

A Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of cerebrovascular accidents using patient demographic and clinical characteristic variables.

B Calibration curve demonstrating the agreement between the observed and the predicted outcome.

DISCUSSION

The observed CVA rates associated with PCI (0.56%) in this largest-to-date observational study analyzing the incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of CVA associated with PCI in “real world” clinical practice are comparable to the 0.07% to 1.4% range reported in previous studies (38).

CVA is a devastating complication associated with PCI (1,4,13,14). Origins of cerebral emboli associated with catheterization may include plaque disruption (5,7,15,16), catheter-related thrombus formation (4,7) or air embolism (7,17). Despite the pharmacological and technical advances in PCI, the incidence of CVA complicating PCI did not change significantly from 1998 to 2008 in our study. This is consistent with two registries from similar observation periods (6,18). A possible explanation for the unchanging incidence of CVA associated with PCI may be due to the parallel balance between the increase in the number of complex PCIs performed over the years and the improved, contemporary management strategies for patients undergoing PCI.

We observed ischemic CVA in 53.4%, transient cerebral ischemia in 33.0% and hemorrhagic CVA in 8.2% of cases. This is comparable to a single-center registry study between 1994 and 2009 that reported TIA and hemorrhagic stroke rates at 22% and 7%, respectively. In another study, the primary hemorrhagic stroke rate was 5%, and ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion was noted in 15% of patients with stroke complicating PCI (7). In nearly 10,000 patients from 1991 to 1999, overall stroke rate was 0.38%; 46.5% were hemorrhagic and 48.8% ischemic (3). The dissimilarity noted between our and these very high rates in the incidence of hemorrhagic stroke may be explained by different study periods, markedly smaller patient population and stroke diagnosis methods. While NIS in an administrative database without event adjudication, a neurologist performed the diagnosis of stroke using computed tomography in the other study, likely accounting for the observed differences.

From 2005 to 2009, the use of unfractionated heparin, low molecular weight heparin and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) decreased significantly and the use of bivalirudin increased (19). The use of bivalirudin has been associated with reduced access- and non-access site bleeding; no difference has been reported in stroke incidence (15,20). The use of GPI has not been associated with increased stroke rates (21). Finally, adoption of higher loading doses of clopidogrel during the study period likely had a neutral effect on the incidence of periprocedural CVA. Therefore, it is unlikely that the changes in antiplatelet and antithrombotic pharmacology management of ACS contributed to the lower incidence of hemorrhagic CVA (22). Another likely explanation could be attributed to a possible decrease in the utilization of thrombolytic therapy over the study period. Both systemic and intracoronary thrombolytic therapy in the setting of an AMI has been well established as an independent risk factor for hemorrhagic stroke (23,24).

Emergent catheterization is a predictor for periprocedural stroke (9). Increased risk of CVA in patients undergoing an emergent catheterization is possibly hemodynamic compromise increasing the risk of ischemic stroke and cursory advancement of catheters increasing the risk of plaque dislodgement (9,25). Given these findings we would have expected AMI to be a predictor for CVA associated with PCI as noted in previous studies (11). A reason for AMI not being a predictor of CVA is possibly due to the refinements in the devices used for PCI (15,25,26).

The increased risk of CVA with IABP use requires special mention. Stone et al. observed a 2.4% stroke rate in patients with AMI randomized to IABP compared to the control group (27). A few other studies have also noted the use of IABP as a predictor for stroke complicating PCI (3,9). We similarly noted that patients who received an IABP were 1.4 times more likely to have CVA associated with PCI. Lastly, the IABP-SHOCK II trial, however, showed no difference in CVA associated with IABP use in AMI.(28)

The large sample size in this study helped clarify the role of predictors for stroke complicating PCI. These individual risk predictors were then used to develop a risk calculator for stroke associated with PCI. The nomogram achieved a C-index of 0.73, indicating good discrimination ability to separate patients who developed CVA from others who did not. The calibration plot for the nomogram indicates reasonable correspondence between predicted probabilities and observed proportions. An online version of the risk calculator can be found at http://www.r-calc.com.

The overall mortality in our CVA cohort was 10.76% consistent with other studies (3,6,911). The high mortality rate in patients with CVA associated with PCI is likely multifactorial. These patients are older with several comorbid conditions (3,7,9,11), lower ejection fractions (7) and have hemodynamic instability requiring IABP placement (3,9). A reassuring finding in this NIS-PCI registry is that the risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality rate in patients with CVA associated with PCI significantly decreased from 1998 to 2008 (Table 3). These data are consistent with reported decreases in stroke mortality during the same period and reflects improvement in acute stroke care (29,30).

Data about management patterns, utilization rates or dosing of the various medications (e.g., thrombolytics) that have been associated with CVA were not collected. The database does not allow for evaluation of practice patterns and precludes us from confirming an association between the trends in the utilization of specific medications, equipment’s and techniques (e.g., radial vs. femoral access) with the incidence of CVA. The details on the type and temporal relationship of CVA to PCI were not available. The CVA might have occurred prior to PCI - this is exceedingly unlikely since the first procedure performed in this dataset was PCI. The identification and definition of CVA was determined by the local sites and not centrally adjudicated. The underreporting of CVA cannot be excluded, and could have biased the estimation of the true incidence of CVA and the mortality rate associated with CVA. Additional unmeasured confounders may have accounted for the observed differences. NIS does not collect long-term outcomes. Participation in the NIS registry is voluntary and only selected centers may have participated in this registry, the results may not be generalized to all U.S. hospitals/population at large.

Supplementary Material

01

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources

This study is supported in part by the Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois at Chicago and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant UL1TR000050. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Brown DL, Topol EJ. Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 1993;72:1207–1209. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90998-r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Dorros G, Cowley MJ, Simpson J, Bentivoglio LG, Block PC, Bourassa M, Detre K, Gosselin AJ, Gruntzig AR, Kelsey SF, Kent KM, Mock MB, Mullin SM, Myler RK, Passamani ER, Stertzer SH, Williams DO. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: report of complications from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PTCA Registry. Circulation. 1983;67:723–730. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.4.723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fuchs S, Stabile E, Kinnaird TD, Mintz GS, Gruberg L, Canos DA, Pinnow EE, Kornowski R, Suddath WO, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Weissman NJ. Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary interventions: incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications. Circulation. 2002;106:86–91. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000020678.16325.e0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Segal AZ, Abernethy WB, Palacios IF, BeLue R, Rordorf G. Stroke as a complication of cardiac catheterization: risk factors and clinical features. Neurology. 2001;56:975–977. doi: 10.1212/wnl.56.7.975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Busing KA, Schulte-Sasse C, Fluchter S, Suselbeck T, Haase KK, Neff W, Hirsch JG, Borggrefe M, Duber C. Cerebral infarction: incidence and risk factors after diagnostic and interventional cardiac catheterization--prospective evaluation at diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology. 2005;235:177–183. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2351040117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hoffman SJ, Holmes DR, Jr, Rabinstein AA, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, Lennon RJ, Bashir R, Gulati R. Trends, predictors, and outcomes of cerebrovascular events related to percutaneous coronary intervention: a 16-year single-center experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:415–422. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kawamura A, Lombardi DA, Tilem ME, Gossman DE, Piemonte TC, Nesto RW. Stroke complicating percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circ J. 2007;71:1370–1375. doi: 10.1253/circj.71.1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Saczynski JS, Spencer FA, Gore JM, Gurwitz JH, Yarzebski J, Lessard D, Goldberg RJ. Twenty-year trends in the incidence of stroke complicating acute myocardial infarction: Worcester Heart Attack Study. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:2104–2110. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dukkipati S, O'Neill WW, Harjai KJ, Sanders WP, Deo D, Boura JA, Bartholomew BA, Yerkey MW, Sadeghi HM, Kahn JK. Characteristics of cerebrovascular accidents after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:1161–1167. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoffman SJ, Routledge HC, Lennon RJ, Mustafa MZ, Rihal CS, Gersh BJ, Holmes DR, Jr, Gulati R. Procedural factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention-related ischemic stroke. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:200–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wong SC, Minutello R, Hong MK. Neurological complications following percutaneous coronary interventions (a report from the 2000–2001 New York State Angioplasty Registry) Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1248–1250. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.D'Agostino RB., Jr Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Stat Med. 1998;17:2265–2281. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Alio J, Esplugas E, Arboix A, Rubio F. Cerebrovascular events in cardiac catheterization. Stroke. 1993;24:1264. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lazar JM, Uretsky BF, Denys BG, Reddy PS, Counihan PJ, Ragosta M. Predisposing risk factors and natural history of acute neurologic complications of left-sided cardiac catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:1056–1060. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80724-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Stone GW, McLaurin BT, Cox DA, Bertrand ME, Lincoff AM, Moses JW, White HD, Pocock SJ, Ware JH, Feit F, Colombo A, Aylward PE, Cequier AR, Darius H, Desmet W, Ebrahimi R, Hamon M, Rasmussen LH, Rupprecht HJ, Hoekstra J, Mehran R, Ohman EM. Bivalirudin for patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2203–2216. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lund C, Nes RB, Ugelstad TP, Due-Tonnessen P, Andersen R, Hol PK, Brucher R, Russell D. Cerebral emboli during left heart catheterization may cause acute brain injury. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1269–1275. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wijman CA, Kase CS, Jacobs AK, Whitehead RE. Cerebral air embolism as a cause of stroke during cardiac catheterization. Neurology. 1998;51:318–319. doi: 10.1212/wnl.51.1.318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Budaj A, Flasinska K, Gore JM, Anderson FA, Jr, Dabbous OH, Spencer FA, Goldberg RJ, Fox KA. Magnitude of and risk factors for in-hospital and postdischarge stroke in patients with acute coronary syndromes: findings from a Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Circulation. 2005;111:3242–3247. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.512806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Roe MT, Messenger JC, Weintraub WS, Cannon CP, Fonarow GC, Dai D, Chen AY, Klein LW, Masoudi FA, McKay C, Hewitt K, Brindis RG, Peterson ED, Rumsfeld JS. Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:254–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stone GW, Witzenbichler B, Guagliumi G, Peruga JZ, Brodie BR, Dudek D, Kornowski R, Hartmann F, Gersh BJ, Pocock SJ, Dangas G, Wong SC, Kirtane AJ, Parise H, Mehran R, Investigators H-AT. Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2218–2230. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Akkerhuis KM, Deckers JW, Lincoff AM, Tcheng JE, Boersma E, Anderson K, Balog C, Califf RM, Topol EJ, Simoons ML. Risk of stroke associated with abciximab among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA. 2001;286:78–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mehta SR, Tanguay JF, Eikelboom JW, Jolly SS, Joyner CD, Granger CB, Faxon DP, Rupprecht HJ, Budaj A, Avezum A, Widimsky P, Steg PG, Bassand JP, Montalescot G, Macaya C, Di Pasquale G, Niemela K, Ajani AE, White HD, Chrolavicius S, Gao P, Fox KA, Yusuf S investigators C-Ot. Double-dose versus standard-dose clopidogrel and high-dose versus low-dose aspirin in individuals undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes (CURRENT-OASIS 7): a randomised factorial trial. Lancet. 2010;376:1233–1243. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61088-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cubo E, Estefania CM, Monaco M, Monaco E, Gonzalez M, Egido JA, Gonzalez JL, Macaya C. Risk factors of stroke after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Eur J Neurol. 1998;5:459–462. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.1998.550459.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Weaver WD, Simes RJ, Betriu A, Grines CL, Zijlstra F, Garcia E, Grinfeld L, Gibbons RJ, Ribeiro EE, DeWood MA, Ribichini F. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty and intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review. JAMA. 1997;278:2093–2098. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Keeley EC, Grines CL. Scraping of aortic debris by coronary guiding catheters: a prospective evaluation of 1,000 cases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1861–1865. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00497-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Eggebrecht H, Oldenburg O, Dirsch O, Haude M, Baumgart D, Welge D, Herrmann J, Arnold G, Schmid KW, Erbel R. Potential embolization by atherosclerotic debris dislodged from aortic wall during cardiac catheterization:: histological and clinical findings in 7,621 patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;49:389–394. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200004)49:4<389::aid-ccd8>3.0.co;2-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stone GW, Marsalese D, Brodie BR, Griffin JJ, Donohue B, Costantini C, Balestrini C, Wharton T, Esente P, Spain M, Moses J, Nobuyoshi M, Ayres M, Jones D, Mason D, Grines L, O'Neill WW, Grines CL. A prospective, randomized evaluation of prophylactic intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in high risk patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty. Second Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI-II) Trial Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;29:1459–1467. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00088-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, de Waha A, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Lauer B, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Werdan K, Schuler G. Intraaortic Balloon Pump in cardiogenic shock IIti. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2013;382:1638–1645. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ovbiagele B. Nationwide trends in in-hospital mortality among patients with stroke. Stroke. 2010;41:1748–1754. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kunst AE, Amiri M, Janssen F. The decline in stroke mortality: exploration of future trends in 7 Western European countries. Stroke. 2011;42:2126–2130. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.599712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01

RESOURCES