Abstract
T cell activation by antigen is one of the key events in adaptive immunity. It is triggered by interactions of the T-cell receptor (TCR) and coreceptor (CD8 or CD4) with antigenic peptides embedded in the major histocompatibility complex (pMHC) molecules expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs). The mechanism of how signal is initiated remains unclear. Here we complement our two-dimensional (2D) kinetic analysis of TCR–pMHC–CD8 interaction with concurrent calcium imaging to examine how ligand engagement of TCR with and without the coengagement of CD8 initiates signaling. We found that accumulation of frequently applied forces on the TCR via agonist pMHC triggered calcium, which was further enhanced by CD8 cooperative binding. Prolonging the intermission between sequential force application simpaired calcium signals. Our data support a model where rapid accumulation of serial forces on TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds triggers calcium in T cells.
Introduction
T-cell effector functions result from activation of signaling cascades triggered by interactions of the T-cell receptor (TCR) with antigen peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (pMHC)(1, 2). TCR–pMHC interaction in cooperation with coreceptor CD4 or CD8 initiates phosphorylation of the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs of the CD3 by the lymphocyte-specific protein tyrosine kinase p56lck, which allows docking of the zetachain-associated protein kinase 70. Activation signals are transduced by the coordinated phosphorylation of additional protein kinases, recruitment of the adaptor molecules such as linker for activation of T cells, and activation of the phospholipase Cγ (1). This initiates the production of diacylglycerol and inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate, which rises cytosolic calcium by Ca2+ release from intracellular stores and Ca2+ entry from activated store-operated channels in the plasma membrane (3-5). The level and duration of the Ca2+ flux together with other signaling events determine the downstream T-cell response (6).
Since TCR is the only molecule on the T-cell surface that interacts with specific antigen, the kinetic parameters of its interaction with pMHC provide the first-level control of downstream T-cell effector functions (7, 8). However, it is unclear how pMHC binding to the membrane-distal end of the TCR causes the defined biochemical changes in the cytoplasmic domains of the associated CD3 that initiate the signaling cascade. Several models have been proposed to explain how the signal embedded in the TCR–pMHC binding is transduced across the T-cell membrane. Proposed mechanisms include TCR mechanosensor (9), receptor deformation/conformational changes (9-14), kinetic segregation (15), TCR clustering (16), permissive geometry (17), signaling chain homooligomerization (18), and serial engagement (7, 19). Yet, the detailed mechanisms remain unresolved.
Previously, we used the micropipette adhesion frequency assay (20, 21) to analyze in situ kinetics of TCR–pMHC (7, 22, 23) and pMHC–CD8 (22, 24) bimolecular interactions as well as TCR–pMHC–CD8 (22, 25) trimolecular interaction on the surface of living T cells. These two-dimensional (2D) measurements are found to correlate with T-cell activation better than their three-dimensional (3D) counterparts measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR)(7, 22, 23, 26). However, the functions examined in cytokine secretion and proliferation studies are quite distant from the initial TCR triggering event, occur in time scales far longer than pMHC binding of TCR and/or coreceptor, and require separate assays performed under different conditions from that of the 2D kinetic measurement. To address this shortcoming, we combined the high temporal resolution micropipette 2D kinetic analysis with concurrent calcium imaging in this study, since calcium mobilization occurs rapidly after TCR engagement (27-29). We found that calcium was triggered by accumulation of frequently applied serial forces on TCR and/or CD8 via agonist pMHC.
Materials and Methods
Cells and proteins
Naive CD8+ T cells from OT1 transgenic mice were obtained using an Emory University IACUC-approved protocol. The following peptides were synthesized: ovalbumin-derived peptides OVA (SIINFEKL), A2 (SAINFEKL), G4 (SIIGFEKL), E1 (EIINFEKL) and R4 (SIIRFEKL), and a vesicular stomatitis virus-derived peptide VSV (RGYVYQGL) (7). OVA, A2, E1, and R4are recognized by the OT1 TCR but VSV is a null peptide. Monomeric mouse pMHC-I H-2Kb with C-terminal biotin tags and pMHC-I mutant (OVA:H-2Kbα3A2) were produced by the NIH Tetramer Core Facility. PE-conjugated anti-mouse TCR Vα2 (B20.1) and Vβ 11 (RR3-15) were from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Anti-mouse H-2Kb (3H2672, PE-conjugated) was from US Biological (Swampscott, MA) and Biocarta (San Diego, CA), respectively. Anti-biotin (Bio3-18E7.2, PE-conjugated) was from Miltenyi Biotec (Auburn, CA). Intracellular calcium indicator Fura-2/AM was from Invitrogen (San Diego, CA).
Coating pMHC onto RBCs and determining site densities
RBCs were isolated with a Georgia Institute of Technology IRB-approved protocol as described (7). To coat different pMHC densities, RBCs were biotinylated with Biotin-X-NHS (EMD) at different concentrations as described (24). Biotinylated RBCs were incubated with excess streptavidin for 30 min and with saturating amount of pMHC for another 30 min after removing unbound streptavidin. The densities of pMHC, TCR, and CD8 were determined by flow cytometry as described (7).
Determining RBC membrane tension
RBC membrane tension (TRBC) was determined from the suction pressure (ΔP) and the respective radii of the micropipette (Rp) and the spherical portion of the RBC outside the pipette (RRBC) using the Law of Laplace, which results in the following formula (30).
(1) |
Dual micropipette system for 2D kinetic analysis
We customized an inverted microscope (TMD Diaphot, Nikon) by mounting two identical sets of 3D mechanical manipulators (Newport) on each side of the microscope stage to hold opposing glass pipettes for capturing a pair of cells. A computer with a LabVIEW software (National Instruments) controlled the one-dimensional open-loop piezo actuator LVPZT (P840-1, Physik Instrumente) mounted on one side of the manipulator to drive its approach and retract movements. Using an analog CCD camera (MTI DC330, Dage), we acquired real-time images at 30 frames per second and simultaneously observed them through a TV monitor and recorded by a VCR.
The micropipette adhesion frequency assay has been described (20, 21). Briefly, a T cell and a RBC were aspirated by respective pipettes (Fig. 1) and driven to contact with controlled area Ac and duration tc. Adhesion was observed from stretching of the RBC on T cell retraction. Each T-cell–RBC pair was tested for a total of 10 min during which the contact-retract cycle at a given contact duration was repeated. 10-12 cell pairs were used to estimate an adhesion frequency Pa (mean ± s.e.m.) at each given contact duration, which was calculated as the number of adhesions Na divided by the number of total contacts Nc.
Calculations of the number of bonds and their lifetimes accumulated over the 10-min experimental period
The average number of bonds <n> present at any time during a contact can be calculated from the adhesion frequency Pa (7, 20):
(2) |
Due to the rapid 2D kinetics of the OT1 TCR–OVA:H-2Kbα3A2 interaction (Fig. 4A) (7), at contact durations tc> 0.1 s, <n> reached steady-state and is equal to:
(3) |
where mr and ml are the respective site densities of the TCR and pMHC, and the product AcKa of Ac (contact area) and Ka (2D affinity) is the effective 2D affinity (7, 20). Eq. 3 is obtained by setting tc→∞ in Eq. 2 of the Online Methods of Ref. (7). Since koff ranges from 1-10 s-1 (7), a few seconds of contact time tc is long enough to be considered as infinity because exp (− kofftc) would be negligible compared to 1. It follows from Eq. 3 that multiplying <n> by the previously measured 2D off-rate koff (∼10 s-1) yields the cellular on-rate, or the frequency of bond formation during T-cell–RBC contact:
(4) |
Multiplying the frequency of bond formation (Eq. 4) by a given contact duration tc (or the cumulative contact duration Σtc for the entire 10-min experiment) yields the number of bonds formed at that contact Nb (or the cumulative number of bonds formed ΣNb).
(5a) |
(5b) |
Since the reciprocal off-rate is the average bond lifetime (31), we can multiply Nb (or ΣNb) by 1/koff to obtain the length of time tb during the contact when a TCR or TCRs are engaged with pMHC (or the cumulative bond lifetime Σtb):
(6a) |
(6b) |
Thus, <n> is also the fraction of contact time during which the TCR is engaged with pMHC. The calculations for the case of TCR–OVA:H-2Kb–CD8 trimolecular interaction are assumed similar.
Calcium measurements
Naïve CD8+ T cells were loaded with Fura-2/AM (3 μM in DMSO), incubated for 30 min at 37°C, washed twice with PBS buffer (pH 7.4). T cells and RBC pre-coated with pMHC were transferred into microscopic chamber with L-15/HEPES media (Sigma). Similar to the previously used adhesion frequency assay for 2D kinetics analysis, each T-cell–RBC pair was tested repeatedly at a given contact duration, but for a total 10 min of experimental period instead of 100 contact-retract cycles. Concurrently, dual excitation filters (340 and 380 nm) were switched automatically using a filter wheel (Sutter) to filter xenon light (Lambda LS, Sutter) to excite the Fura-2. The image acquisition and analysis was performed with using NIS-Element software (Nikon). For chelating extracellular Ca2+, EGTA (final concentration 1 mM) were injected directly into chamber medium. Experiments were done at 37°C unless otherwise stated.
Statistical analysis
The statistical signficance of differences were calculated using F-test and ANOVA. A p-value <0.05 is considered statistically significant.
Results
We upgraded our micropipette system by adding an optical path to enable concurrent micromanipulation and calcium imaging (Fig. S1). The micropipette adhesion frequency assay (20) uses a red blood cell (RBC) as a surrogate APC for presentation of H-2Kb MHC molecules loaded with OVA or variant peptides for TCR and/or CD8 binding. It also functions as an adhesion sensor to detect binding to a naïve OT1 CD8+ T cell (Fig. 1A, left panels). The presence of a bond or bonds at the end of a given contact duration tc is registered by RBC elongation upon its retraction (lower left panel of Fig. 1A), which pulls on the TCR and/or CD8 via engaged pMHC(s) until bond rupture, allowing the approach/retraction cycle to be repeated. The adhesion frequency Pa is calculated as the number of adhesions Na divided by the total number of test cycles Nc for a given cell pair with the same contact duration and area (Fig. 1A, right panel). Concurrently, Fura-2 ratiometric fluorescence imaging (Fig. 1B) of the cytosolic calcium concentration (Fig. 1C) in the same T cell was performed over the same 10-min period.
Serial adhesions to agonist pMHC-bearing RBC induced calcium in T cell
Repeated formation and detachment of T-cell adhesions to RBC coated with OVA:H-2Kb induced a specific increase in intracellular calcium that reached a maximum level within 4-5 min at 37°C (Fig. 1B middle row and green curves in C). Neither binding (Fig. 1A right panel) nor calcium increase (Fig. 1B top row and Fig. 1C dark blue dotted curve) was observed when the null peptide VSV:H-2Kb instead of OVA:H-2Kb was coated on biotinylated RBC or when no pMHC was coated (Fig. 1B bottom row and Fig. 1C light blue dashed curve). Cyclic T-cell contacts with surrogate APC were required as stopping the test cycles returned the Fura-2 fluorescence ratio back to the baseline level (Fig. 1D). Further, subsequent resumption of T-cell–RBC contact cycles resumed the increase in calcium (Fig. 1E). Interestingly, holding T-cell and RBC in uninterrupted contact for 10 min did not result in appreciable calcium despite that bond formation and dissociation continuously occurred at the zero-force condition (20), suggesting a requirement of mechanical pulling on the TCR and/or CD8 to trigger calcium in this time window (Fig. 1F).
The major features of the calcium time courses, shown as example in Fig. 1C, could be captured by two parameters: the maximal calcium level normalized by the initial value (Imax) and the calcium level measured as integrated calcium or Area Under the Curve (AUC) traditionally used to present intracellular calcium data. The strong linear correlation between these two parameters (Fig. 2A) allows us to use either parameter as a reduced representation of the calcium data in the subsequent analysis.
The Ca2+ response was faster and reached a higher level when measured at 37 than 25 °C (Fig. 1C). The calcium level measured as AUC at 37°C was significantly reduced by removal of extracellular calcium (by adding EGTA to chamber solution) to a level comparable to the 25°C level. Calcium level at 25°C was not affected by depletion of extracellular calcium (Fig. 2B). These results are consistent with previous reports (4, 32), confirming that the cytosolic calcium in T cells induced by pMHC engagement came from two sources. The release from intracellular calcium storage gave rise to the calcium flux that occurred at both 25 and 37°C. The additional calcium increase at 37°C resulted from calcium entry through plasma membrane channels.
Stiffening the APC increases calcium responses in T cells
It has recently been shown that T-cell signaling is enhanced by the increasing stiffness of the substrate to which the pMHC ligand is linked (33). The substrate in our experiment is the RBC adhesion sensor whose rigidity could be easily manipulated by tuning its membrane tension through changes in the micropipette suction pressure (see Eq. 1, Materials and Methods) (31). Consistent with the previous report (33), we observed that increasing the RBC membrane tension (increased suction pressure) induced higher calcium levels (Fig. 3). To achieve the piconewton sensitivity of the force transducer with a soft RBC yet trigger good levels of calcium, we used mid-range membrane tensions for all experiments in this paper except those indicated in Fig. 3. The data in Fig. 3 support the view that the TCR can sense mechanical cues presented via pMHC. For a given approach/retraction speed of the T-cell–RBC adhesion test cycle, increases in RBC membrane tension led to greater loading rates of the pulling force applied to the TCR–pMHC and TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds, which could provide a potential mechanism for mechanosensing.
This potential mechanism may relate to a recent finding that increasing the loading rate of applied force changes the dissociation characteristics of L-selectin bond with P-selectin glycoprotein ligand 1 from a catch-slip bond with prolonged lifetime at optimal force to a slip-only bond with much shorter lifetime under higher force (34). Catch bond, a counterintuitive behavior where force strengthens the molecular interaction as opposed to slip bond that weakens it, has been suggested to provide a potential mechanosensing mechanism (9, 35, 36). We found that increasing approach/retraction speed by shortening the approach/retraction segments of the contact cycle triggered lower level of calcium in T cells (Fig. S2). These data suggest that the duration of force applied by engaged pMHC on TCR and/or CD8 may be important for their triggering. In all other figures the RBCs were driven to and from the T cells with 1-s duration each (cf. Fig. 4A).
Frequently applied intermittent forces triggers strong calcium
In addition to the approach and retraction speed, we also varied the intermission length between consecutive contacts (Fig. 4A). To do so without changing the approach/retraction speed of the RBC, we increased the pause period tp (from the moment when the previous retraction ends to the moment when the next approach starts) from 0 to 5 and 10 s while keeping the contact duration constant at tc = 2 s. Two agonist peptides presented by H-2Kb, OVA and A2, were tested using these repeated cycles for a range of constant pause periods. The pMHC densities on the RBCs were adjusted to ensure similar adhesion frequencies (∼60%) for both peptides. As shown in Fig. 4B, increasing the pause period tp dose-dependently suppressed the calcium response to OVA engagement at experimental time > 250 s. Calcium response to A2 stimulation was similarly reduced by prolonging the pause period tp, in particular at longer experimental time (Fig. 4C). These data indicate that reducing the frequency of force application to the TCR and/or CD8 lowers the ability to elicit T-cell calcium response.
Characterization of calcium response to cyclic adhesion tests
To correlate calcium signaling with adhesion kinetics, we contacted T cells with repeated cycles of a range of constant durations and observed the two-stage adhesion kinetics previously reported (22, 25) (Fig. 5A). The first-stage is identified by the rapid plateau in adhesion frequency Pa vs. contact duration tc and was mediated by TCR–pMHC bimolecular interaction as shown using the mutant MHC (H-2Kbα3A2) that substituted the mouse H-2Kb α3 domain by that of human HLA-A2 to eliminate the mouse CD8 binding site. After the contact duration reached 1-s, the adhesion frequency sharply increased to a second plateau, which was CD8-dependent, as it was not observed using H-2Kbα3A2. We previously demonstrated that the second-stage adhesion is Src kinase-dependent and mediated by TCR–pMHC–CD8 trimolecular interaction (22, 25). Note that, at 50-60% adhesion frequencies, many of the adhesions could be mediated by multiple bonds. The characterization of the force applied to single bond is the subject of another publication (Liu et al., unpublished data). Using the mutant MHC to prevent CD8 binding abolished calcium response at 25°C while low calcium levels were observed at 37°C, which was insensitive to the contact duration beyond 0.1 s (Fig. 5B). The calcium signal in response to wild-type MHC was indistinguishable to that obtained using the mutant MHC at contact durations tc< 1 s, which was likely due to the absence of CD8-dependent binding at short contact durations. Much higher calcium was induced by longer contact durations when adhesions were enhanced by the TCR–pMHC–CD8 trimolecular interactions. Overall calcium levels rapidly increased at 1 s and reached a maximum at 2 s at both 37 and 25°C, although levels were much higher at 37°C (Fig. 5B). These data build on the published results that the coreceptor CD8 augments the sensitivity of antigen recognition by a T cell (37). As contact time tc increased beyond 2 s (Fig. 5B), the calcium signal decreased, suggesting that contact duration per se is insufficient to trigger calcium. This observation is also consistent with the inability of continuous contact to trigger calcium (Fig. 1F). In addition to OVA:H-2Kb, we analyzed the calcium response in T cells repeatedly contacted by RBCs bearing H-2Kb bound with several well-characterized altered peptide ligand variants, including A2 (agonist), E1 (weak agonist/antagonist), and R4 (antagonist) (7). Densities of different pMHCs on RBCs were adjusted to achieve similar adhesion frequencies (Fig. S3A-C). The variant agonist A2 induced a similar AUC vs. tc curve (Fig. S3D) to the wild-type agonist OVA (Fig. 5B). In contrast, the lower affinity peptides (E1 and R4) failed to generate appreciable calcium at 25°C (Fig. S3E and F), consistent with the lower potencies of these weaker ligands to trigger T-cell signaling.
Accumulation of frequently applied forces on TCR and/or CD8 via engaged antigen pMHC triggers Ca2+ signaling
The concurrent in situ kinetic measurements of TCR–pMHC and/or TCR–pMHC–CD8 interactions and imaging of intracellular calcium generated two 10-min time courses for each T cell tested (cf. Fig. 1A right panel upper curve and Fig. 1C green curve). To decipher the relationships between them, we performed single-cell correlative analysis of the two time courses. We chose AUC and the maximal Fura-2 ratio Imax as the metrics for analyzing the calcium time course. To reduce data representation of the repeated contact cycles, we calculated the adhesion frequency Pa, the cumulative number of bonds ΣNb predicted to form in all contacts (cf. Eq. 5b), the accumulation of bond lifetime Σtb during all contacts (cf. Eq. 6b) when a TCR or TCRs are predicted to engage with pMHC with or without the co-engagement of CD8, and the number of observed adhesions Na. Note that ΣNb and Σtb represent, respectively, the total number of bonds formed and the accumulation of their lifetimes during all cyclic contacts Σtc in the absence of tensile force (20). By comparison, adhesions were observed only at the end of tc when a bond or bonds (if any) were pulled by force to stretch the RBC. So Na represents a small fraction of the total bonds formed that were pulled by force (cf. Fig. 1A).
The correlative analysis was first done by comparing the ΣNb (Fig. 5C, left ordinate) vs. tc, Σtb (Fig. 5C, right ordinate) vs. tc, and Navs. tc (Fig. 5D) curves with the AUC vs. tc curve (Fig. 5B). The cumulative number of bonds ΣNb and their cumulative lifetimes Σtb increased monotonically with the contact duration tc (Fig. 5C), as expected from their respective definitions (cf. Eqs. 5b and 6b). The number of observed adhesions Na for OVA:H2-Kb increased with tc when tc ≤ 1 s but decreased after tc ≥ 2 s (Fig. 5D). This is because Pa increased with tc before the second-stage adhesion (see Fig. 5A), but the total number of contact cycles repeated in the 10-min experiment, Nc = Na/Pa, was reduced by increasing contact duration per cycle beyond tc ≥ 2 s. It is very telling that the AUC vs. tc curves (Fig. 5B) do not resemble the Pa (Fig. 5A), ΣNb and Σtb (Fig. 5C) vs. tc curves, but resemble the Na vs. tc curves (Fig. 5D). Using Imax instead of AUC as calcium induction metric (Fig. S4), which resembles Fig. 5B, led to the same conclusion. These results suggest that the predictor for calcium induction is not how likely adhesion occurs, how many bonds are formed, or how long these bond lifetimes accumulate during repeated T-cell–RBC contacts, but is the accumulation of these bonds that are pulled at the end of the serial contacts.
To obtain further evidence, we next plotted directly the two metrics for calcium induction vs. Pa, ΣNb, Σtb, and Na and examined the correlation of (or the lack thereof) these parameters (Fig. 6). Consistent with the resemblance between Fig. 5B and Fig. 5D, and the lack of resemblance between Fig. 5B and Fig. 5A&C, repeat contacts by OVA:H2-Kb induced intracellular calcium fluxes in OT1 T cells that first increased with increasing Pa, ΣNb and Σtb (Fig. 6A, B, D and E). After reaching a maximum, Ca2+ rapidly decreased to the level comparable to that of OVA:H2-Kbα3A2, which remained very low. This calcium decrease in response to increasing Pa, ΣNb and Σtb refuted the adhesion frequency, cumulative number of bonds and their cumulative lifetimes as determining parameters of calcium signals. By comparison, Ca2+ increased with Na as two line segments of similar positive slopes but different levels (Fig. 6C&F). The lower segment represents calcium induction by pulling on mostly TCR–pMHC bimolecular bonds, as it corresponds to short contact durations tc ≤ 1 s (indicated) where the adhesion frequency curve is in the first plateau (Fig. 5A). The upper segment represents calcium induction by pulling on TCR–pMHC–CD8 trimolecular bonds, for it corresponds to long contact durations tc ≥ 2 s where the adhesion frequency curve is in the second plateau (Fig. 5A). Contacts at threshold duration tc = 1 s produced both bi- and tri-molecular bonds, therefore inducing an intermediate level of calcium that connected the two segments. The reverse relationship between Na and tc is evident from Fig. 6C&F, explaining the decrease in calcium with increasing tc as it exceeded 2 s (Figs. 5B and S3). It also explains the calcium decrease in Fig. 6B&E when ΣNb > 3500 (Σtb >350 s), because these correspond to increasing tc and decreasing Na. Together, these data support the hypothesis that T-cell signaling was induced by accumulation of applied pulling forces on TCR–pMHC–CD8 trimolecular bonds.
Discussion
In this paper we studied calcium responses to pMHC engagement with TCR with and without the co-engagement of CD8 in naive T cells. We found that calcium signals increased with the biological activity of the peptide (Figs. 4 and 2A) and were enhanced by cooperative binding between TCR and CD8 for pMHC (Figs. 5 and 6). Initially calcium was released from intracellular storage at both 25 and 37°C and additional calcium increase resulted from its entry through plasma membrane channels (Figs. 1C and 2) that strongly depends on the STIM1 and Ca2+-ATPase activity, which occurs at 37°C but generally reduces at 25°C (38). Increasing the membrane tension of the surrogate APC also increased the calcium levels (Fig. 3) (33).
Calcium signal was monitored using an optical path added to our micropipette experimental system. This system allows us to vary the following parameters: 1) the timing when the T cell begins and ends its contact with the pMHC-bearing RBC, 2) the speed of approach and separation between the cell pair, 3) the duration of contact, and 4) the intermission period between consecutive contacts. Using this system, for each T cell whose intracellular calcium concentration was measured over time, our temporal manipulation of its contacts with the pMHC-bearing RBC and mechanical measurement of the resulting adhesions generated a concurrent time course of formation and dissociation of TCR–pMHC and/or TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds under force-free condition as well as bond rupture by pulling forces. By correlative analysis of these two time courses we made several observations.
First, repeated contact and separation cycles were required for calcium induction. This was apparent in that long continuous cell contact (10 min) between individual T cells and pMHC-bearing RBCs failed to trigger. Calcium was interrupted when the repeated test cycles were stopped, but resumed once cycles were restarted (Fig. 1D-F). Second, mechanical force pulling on the TCR was required for calcium induction because Ca2+ could not be induced by TCR–pMHC and TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds formed and dissociated in the force-free portions of the contacts. This was shown by the lack of correlation of calcium with the adhesion frequency, the cumulative number of bonds predicted to form and the accumulation of their predicted lifetimes (Figs. 5A and C, 6A, B, D, and E, and S3). Third, accumulation of pulling forces was required for calcium induction because the calcium signals correlated with the number of adhesions observed at the end of the repeated contact when force was applied to rupture the adhesions and independent of their duration (Fig. 6C&F). Fourth, force must be applied to TCR with sufficient frequency and duration because prolonging the intermission period between consecutive contacts (Fig. 4) or shortening the retraction time to rupture the TCR and/or CD8 bonds with pMHC (Fig. S2) decreased the calcium signals. Taken together, these data indicate that signaling via the TCR is mechanical, transient, intermittent, reversible, and cumulative.
These findings support or suggest possible extension and modification of models of T-cell activation and antigen discrimination. Our data demonstrate that, under our experimental conditions, the series of reaction steps of the signaling cascade required for calcium induction in T cells can be triggered but must be sustained by different TCRs rapidly forming and breaking bonds with agonist pMHC (with or without concurrent binding and unbinding with CD8) in a sequential manner. This emphasizes the importance of both on- and off-rates, supporting a recently extended version of the kinetic proofreading model (39, 40). The transient, intermittent, reversible, and cumulative nature of T-cell triggering indicates that intermediate signaling states would persist when the TCR–pMHC bonds dissociate and the proofreading steps would resume upon their rebinding, as proposed by the kinetic proofreading model (39, 40) and recently extended version of the serial engagement model (7). Our data suggest that the concentrations of signaling intermediates may represent the intermediate signaling states, which have to be built up progressively by sequential engagements of different TCRs. During intermission between two successive TCR–pMHC and/or TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds, these concentrations may decrease gradually but not instantaneously (see Fig. 1E), which may provide a memory mechanism for the proofreading steps to resume upon TCR re-engagement.
Our study has provided insight to the question of how the TCR mediates mechanosensing of the T cell, showing that serial tensile forces on TCR and/or CD8 induced calcium. In a pioneering study, Kim et al. used optical tweezers-trapped beads bearing pMHC or anti-CD3 to engage the TCR and concluded that calcium was triggered by sinusoidal forces tangential but not normal to the cell surface (41). However, the trapped bead might rotate, potentially generating tensile forces on the TCR–pMHC and/or TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds at the rear edge. In another study, Li et al. used a micropipette to aspirate the T cell and found that Ca2+ was triggered by both tangential and normal forces on the CD3 (42). It should be noted that the T-cell surface has a rough microtopology with numerous microvilli and ruffles (43, 44), which can be easily stretched to reorient along the direction of force (45, 46), making precise conclusions on the direction of force difficult. We have used correlative analysis between calcium signals and single TCR–pMHC bond lifetimes under force to define the nature of the TCR mechanosensor (Liu et al., unpublished data).
Intracellular calcium is a required early signaling event for activation of T cells (3-5). During their life cycle, T cells experience rich and variable mechanical microenvironments, providing ample opportunities for force to exert on the TCR, the coreceptor, and other T cell surface and cytoplasmic molecules (35). As T cells migrate and form kinapses with APCs, force should act on TCR–pMHC and/or TCR–pMHC–CD8 bonds due to relative motions between the two cell membranes. Cell surface proteins are anchored in the membrane often with connections to actin and myosin motors that can propel retrograde flow and cyclic protrusion-contraction that occurs in the immunological synapses formation (47, 48). Of interest, several other receptor–ligand interactions on T cells key for optimal activation, including members of the integrin family, also perform better under conditions of applied force (49-51). Therefore, mechanosensing of force applied to T cell surface proteins and their receptors on interacting cells appear to be a fundamental requirement for T cell activation. Determining how mechanical force specifically regulates T-cell function will be an important goal for future studies and design of therapeutics to regulate lymphocyte activation.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We thank Larissa Doudy for technical support, Kaitao Li for helping the VSV control experiment, and the NIH Tetramer Facility for providing the pMHCs
This work was supported by NIH grants AI38282 and GM096187 (to C.Z.) and AI096879 (to B.E.).
Abbreviations used in this article
- 2D
two-dimensional
- 3D
three-dimensional
- SPR
surface plasmon resonance
- AUC
area under the curve
Footnotes
Disclosures: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.
References
- 1.Germain RN, Stefanova I. The dynamics of T cell receptor signaling: complex orchestration and the key roles of tempo and cooperation. Annu Rev Immunol. 1999;17:467–522. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.van der Merwe PA, Dushek O. Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11:47–55. doi: 10.1038/nri2887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zhou Y, Srinivasan P, Razavi S, Seymour S, Meraner P, Gudlur A, Stathopulos PB, Ikura M, Rao A, Hogan PG. Initial activation of STIM1, the regulator of store-operated calcium entry. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20:973–981. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oh-Hora M, Komatsu N, Pishyareh M, Feske S, Hori S, Taniguchi M, Rao A, Takayanagi H. Agonist-selected T cell development requires strong T cell receptor signaling and store-operated calcium entry. Immunity. 2013;38:881–895. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Putney JW., Jr A model for receptor-regulated calcium entry. Cell Calcium. 1986;7:1–12. doi: 10.1016/0143-4160(86)90026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Katzman SD, O'Gorman WE, Villarino AV, Gallo E, Friedman RS, Krummel MF, Nolan GP, Abbas AK. Duration of antigen receptor signaling determines T-cell tolerance or activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2010;107:18085–18090. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010560107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Huang J, Zarnitsyna VI, Liu B, Edwards LJ, Jiang N, Evavold BD, Zhu C. The kinetics of two-dimensional TCR and pMHC interactions determine T-cell responsiveness. Nature. 2010;464:932–936. doi: 10.1038/nature08944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zarnitsyna V, Zhu C. T cell triggering: insights from 2D kinetics analysis of molecular interactions. Phys Biol. 2012;9:045005. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/4/045005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang Jh, Reinherz EL. The structural basis of αβ T-lineage immune recognition: TCR docking topologies, mechanotransduction, and co-receptor function. Immunol Rev. 2012;250:102–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2012.01161.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Krogsgaard M, Prado N, Adams EJ, He XL, Chow DC, Wilson DB, Garcia KC, Davis MM. Evidence that structural rearrangements and/or flexibility during TCR binding can contribute to T cell activation. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1367–1378. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00474-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Aivazian D, Stern LJ. Phosphorylation of T cell receptor zeta is regulated by a lipid dependent folding transition. Nature structural biology. 2000;7:1023–1026. doi: 10.1038/80930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ma Z, Sharp KA, Janmey PA, Finkel TH. Surface-anchored monomeric agonist pMHCs alone trigger TCR with high sensitivity. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e43. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Xu C, Gagnon E, Call ME, Schnell JR, Schwieters CD, Carman CV, Chou JJ, Wucherpfennig KW. Regulation of T cell receptor activation by dynamic membrane binding of the CD3epsilon cytoplasmic tyrosine-based motif. Cell. 2008;135:702–713. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang H, Cordoba SP, Dushek O, Anton van der Merwe P. Basic residues in the T-cell receptor zeta cytoplasmic domain mediate membrane association and modulate signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:19323–19328. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108052108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davis SJ, van der Merwe PA. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat Immunol. 2006;7:803–809. doi: 10.1038/ni1369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Boniface JJ, Rabinowitz JD, Wulfing C, Hampl J, Reich Z, Altman JD, Kantor RM, Beeson C, McConnell HM, Davis MM. Initiation of signal transduction through the T cell receptor requires the multivalent engagement of peptide/MHC ligands [corrected] Immunity. 1998;9:459–466. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80629-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Minguet S, Swamy M, Alarcon B, Luescher IF, Schamel WW. Full activation of the T cell receptor requires both clustering and conformational changes at CD3. Immunity. 2007;26:43–54. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sigalov AB. Signaling chain homooligomerization (SCHOOL) model. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;640:121–163. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-09789-3_12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Valitutti S, Muller S, Cella M, Padovan E, Lanzavecchia A. Serial triggering of many T-cell receptors by a few peptide-MHC complexes. Nature. 1995;375:148–151. doi: 10.1038/375148a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chesla SE, Selvaraj P, Zhu C. Measuring two-dimensional receptor-ligand binding kinetics by micropipette. Biophys J. 1998;75:1553–1572. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)74074-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zarnitsyna VI, Zhu C. Adhesion frequency assay for in situ kinetics analysis of cross-junctional molecular interactions at the cell-cell interface. J Vis Exp. 2011:e3519. doi: 10.3791/3519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu B, Zhong S, Malecek LA, Johnson LA, Rosenberg SA, Zhu C, Krogsgaard M. 2D TCR-pMHC-CD8 kinetics determines T-cell responses in a self-antigen-specific TCR system. Eur J Immunol. 2013 doi: 10.1002/eji.201343774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Adams JJ, Narayanan S, Liu B, Birnbaum ME, Kruse AC, Bowerman NA, Chen W, Levin AM, Connolly JM, Zhu C, Kranz DM, Garcia KC. T cell receptor signaling is limited by docking geometry to peptide-major histocompatibility complex. Immunity. 2011;35:681–693. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang J, Edwards LJ, Evavold BD, Zhu C. Kinetics of MHC-CD8 interaction at the T cell membrane. J Immunol. 2007;179:7653–7662. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.11.7653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jiang N, Huang J, Edwards LJ, Liu B, Zhang Y, Beal CD, Evavold BD, Zhu C. Two-stage cooperative T cell receptor-peptide major histocompatibility complex-CD8 trimolecular interactions amplify antigen discrimination. Immunity. 2011;34:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Huppa JB, Axmann M, Mortelmaier MA, Lillemeier BF, Newell EW, Brameshuber M, Klein LO, Schutz GJ, Davis MM. TCR-peptide-MHC interactions in situ show accelerated kinetics and increased affinity. Nature. 2010;463:963–967. doi: 10.1038/nature08746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Irvine DJ, Purbhoo MA, Krogsgaard M, Davis MM. Direct observation of ligand recognition by T cells. Nature. 2002;419:845–849. doi: 10.1038/nature01076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Huse M, Klein LO, Girvin AT, Faraj JM, Li QJ, Kuhns MS, Davis MM. Spatial and temporal dynamics of T cell receptor signaling with a photoactivatable agonist. Immunity. 2007;27:76–88. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Purbhoo MA, Irvine DJ, Huppa JB, Davis MM. T cell killing does not require the formation of a stable mature immunological synapse. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:524–530. doi: 10.1038/ni1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hochmuth RM. Micropipette aspiration of living cells. J Biomech. 2000;33:15–22. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00175-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chen W, Zarnitsyna VI, Sarangapani KK, Huang J, Zhu C. Measuring Receptor-Ligand Binding Kinetics on Cell Surfaces: From Adhesion Frequency to Thermal Fluctuation Methods. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2008;1:276–288. doi: 10.1007/s12195-008-0024-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Thiel M, Lis A, Penner R. STIM2 drives Ca2+ oscillations through store-operated Ca2+ entry caused by mild store depletion. J Physiol. 2013;591:1433–1445. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.245399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Judokusumo E, Tabdanov E, Kumari S, Dustin ML, Kam LC. Mechanosensing in T lymphocyte activation. Biophys J. 2012;102:L5–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Sarangapani KK, Qian J, Chen W, Zarnitsyna VI, Mehta P, Yago T, McEver RP, Zhu C. Regulation of catch bonds by rate of force application. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:32749–32761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.240044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Chen W, Zhu C. Mechanical regulation of T-cell functions. Immunol Rev. 2013;256:160–176. doi: 10.1111/imr.12122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhu C. Mechanochemitry: A Molecular Biomechanics View of Mechanosensing. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013 doi: 10.1007/s10439-013-0904-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holler PD, Kranz DM. Quantitative analysis of the contribution of TCR/pepMHC affinity and CD8 to T cell activation. Immunity. 2003;18:255–264. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(03)00019-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xiao B, Coste B, Mathur J, Patapoutian A. Temperature-dependent STIM1 activation induces Ca(2)+ influx and modulates gene expression. Nat Chem Biol. 2011;7:351–358. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jansson A. Kinetic proofreading and the search for nonself-peptides. Self/nonself. 2011;2:1–3. doi: 10.4161/self.2.1.15362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Dushek O, Das R, Coombs D. A Role for Rebinding in Rapid and Reliable T Cell Responses to Antigen. PLoS Comput Biol. 2009;5:e1000578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kim ST, Takeuchi K, Sun ZYJ, Touma M, Castro CE, Fahmy A, Lang MJ, Wagner G, Reinherz EL. The alphabeta T cell receptor is an anisotropic mechanosensor. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:31028–31037. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.052712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li YC, Chen BM, Wu PC, Cheng TL, Kao LS, Tao MH, Lieber A, Roffler SR. Cutting Edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling. J Immunol. 2010;184:5959–5963. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Majstoravich S, Zhang J, Nicholson-Dykstra S, Linder S, Friedrich W, Siminovitch KA, Higgs HN. Lymphocyte microvilli are dynamic, actin-dependent structures that do not require Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein (WASp) for their morphology. Blood. 2004;104:1396–1403. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bruehl RE, Springer TA, Bainton DF. Quantitation of L-selectin distribution on human leukocyte microvilli by immunogold labeling and electron microscopy. J Histochem Cytochem. 1996;44:835–844. doi: 10.1177/44.8.8756756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yao DK, Shao JY. Flexibility of single microvilli on live neutrophils and lymphocytes. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007;76:021907. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.021907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shao JY, Ting-Beall HP, Hochmuth RM. Static and dynamic lengths of neutrophil microvilli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6797–6802. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.12.6797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sims TN, Soos TJ, Xenias HS, Dubin-Thaler B, Hofman JM, Waite JC, Cameron TO, Thomas VK, Varma R, Wiggins CH, Sheetz MP, Littman DR, Dustin ML. Opposing effects of PKCtheta and WASp on symmetry breaking and relocation of the immunological synapse. Cell. 2007;129:773–785. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yi J, Wu XS, Crites T, Hammer JA., 3rd Actin retrograde flow and actomyosin II arc contraction drive receptor cluster dynamics at the immunological synapse in Jurkat T cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23:834–852. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E11-08-0731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen W, Lou J, Zhu C. Forcing switch from short- to intermediate- and long-lived states of the alphaA domain generates LFA-1/ICAM-1 catch bonds. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:35967–35978. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.155770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kong F, Garcia AJ, Mould AP, Humphries MJ, Zhu C. Demonstration of catch bonds between an integrin and its ligand. J Cell Biol. 2009;185:1275–1284. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Choi YI, Duke-Cohan JS, Chen W, Liu B, Rossy J, Tabarin T, Ju L, Gui J, Gaus K, Zhu C, Reinherz EL. Dynamic control of beta1 integrin adhesion by the plexinD1-sema3E axis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:379–384. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314209111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.