. 2014 Jun 22;2014:707095. doi: 10.1155/2014/707095

Table 4.

Difference of canopy parameters among 17 sugarcane varieties.

Variety	LAI	MFIA	TD	TR	LD
FN94-0403	1.487 ± 0.230^a	43.27 ± 13.59^c	0.33 ± 0.06^ab	0.277 ± 0.16^f	0.783 ± 0.08^ab
FN94-0744	1.160 ± 0.214^bcde	50.56 ± 11.90^bc	0.39 ± 0.07^ab	0.354 ± 0.19^cde	0.748 ± 0.09^abc
FN95-1726	1.050 ± 0.072^de	62.94 ± 6.55^ab	0.44 ± 0.02^ab	0.410 ± 0.23^abc	0.722 ± 0.09^bc
FN96-0907	1.247 ± 0.064^abcde	55.99 ± 12.51^abc	0.37 ± 0.02^ab	0.351 ± 0.20^cde	0.770 ± 0.09^ab
FN98-10100	1.420 ± 0.035^ab	50.19 ± 9.93^bc	0.32 ± 0.04^b	0.291 ± 0.16^ef	0.799 ± 0.06^a
GT94-116	1.323 ± 0.086^abcd	49.82 ± 4.23^bc	0.37 ± 0.04^ab	0.325 ± 0.17^def	0.761 ± 0.11^ab
GT95-118	0.987 ± 0.316^e	71.29 ± 11.89^a	0.51 ± 0.13^a	0.460 ± 0.28^a	0.684 ± 0.13^c
GT96-211	1.180 ± 0.125^bcde	60.37 ± 4.78^abc	0.41 ± 0.07^ab	0.374 ± 0.21^bcd	0.736 ± 0.07^abc
GT96-44	1.367 ± 0.076^abc	57.23 ± 4.90^abc	0.37 ± 0.04^ab	0.322 ± 0.19^def	0.776 ± 0.05^ab
GT97-18	1.127 ± 0.211^cde	58.64 ± 13.19^abc	0.44 ± 0.11^ab	0.381 ± 0.23^bcd	0.719 ± 0.10^bc
MT70-611	1.267 ± 0.096^abcde	43.16 ± 5.30^c	0.37 ± 0.02^ab	0.316 ± 0.15^def	0.756 ± 0.12^abc
ROC10	1.063 ± 0.087^de	67.57 ± 1.03^ab	0.47 ± 0.03^ab	0.425 ± 0.25^ab	0.708 ± 0.06^bc
YT92-1287	1.153 ± 0.154^bcde	52.96 ± 11.11^abc	0.41 ± 0.05^ab	0.371 ± 0.20^bcd	0.735 ± 0.12^abc
YT96-107	1.027 ± 0.085^e	61.00 ± 16.68^abc	0.45 ± 0.10^ab	0.415 ± 0.23^abc	0.712 ± 0.10^bc
YT96-794	1.023 ± 0.106^e	60.15 ± 12.02^abc	0.44 ± 0.06^ab	0.409 ± 0.23^abc	0.718 ± 0.10^bc
YT96-835	0.993 ± 0.090^e	58.57 ± 7.32^abc	0.45 ± 0.06^ab	0.419 ± 0.22^abc	0.715 ± 0.10^bc
YT96-86	1.087 ± 0.080^de	54.40 ± 5.16^abc	0.43 ± 0.04^ab	0.383 ± 0.20^bcd	0.726 ± 0.11^abc

Notes: (1) LAI: leaf area index; MFIA: mean leaf angle degree; TD: transmission coefficient for diffuse penetration; TR: transmission coefficient for solar beam radiation penetration; LD: leaf distribution; (2) Different letters in the same column indicate significant difference among different treatments at 0.05 level (Duncan test).