Skip to main content
PMC home page
BioMed Research International logoLink to BioMed Research International
. 2014 Jun 19;2014:512497. doi: 10.1155/2014/512497

Isolation, Screening, and Identification of Cellulolytic Bacteria from Natural Reserves in the Subtropical Region of China and Optimization of Cellulase Production by Paenibacillus terrae ME27-1

Yan-Ling Liang 1, Zheng Zhang 1, Min Wu 1, Yuan Wu 1, Jia-Xun Feng 1,*
PMCID: PMC4090499  PMID: 25050355

Abstract

From different natural reserves in the subtropical region of China, a total of 245 aerobic bacterial strains were isolated on agar plates containing sugarcane bagasse pulp as the sole carbon source. Of the 245 strains, 22 showed hydrolyzing zones on agar plates containing carboxymethyl cellulose after Congo-red staining. Molecular identification showed that the 22 strains belonged to 10 different genera, with the Burkholderia genus exhibiting the highest strain diversity and accounting for 36.36% of all the 22 strains. Three isolates among the 22 strains showed higher carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) activity, and isolate ME27-1 exhibited the highest CMCase activity in liquid culture. The strain ME27-1 was identified as Paenibacillus terrae on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis as well as physiological and biochemical properties. The optimum pH and temperature for CMCase activity produced by the strain ME27-1 were 5.5 and 50°C, respectively, and the enzyme was stable at a wide pH range of 5.0–9.5. A 12-fold improvement in the CMCase activity (2.08 U/mL) of ME27-1 was obtained under optimal conditions for CMCase production. Thus, this study provided further information about the diversity of cellulose-degrading bacteria in the subtropical region of China and found P. terrae ME27-1 to be highly cellulolytic.

1. Introduction

With decades of studies on cellulose bioconversion, cellulases have been playing an important role in producing fermentable sugars from lignocellulosic biomass. Usually, cellulases are mainly composed of three types of synergistic enzymes: endoglucanases (EC 3.2.1.4) that hydrolyze the exposed cellulose chains of the cellulose polymer, exoglucanases (cellobiohydrolases, EC 3.2.1.91) that act to release cellobiose from the reducing and nonreducing ends, and β-glucosidases (EC 3.2.1.21) that help to cleave the cellobiose and short-chain cello-oligosaccharide into glucose [1].

Numerous microorganisms that are able to degrade cellulose have been isolated and identified. However, many studies have put more emphasis on fungi because the cellulases that they produce are abundant and easy to extract, and some of the fungal cellulases have been used as commercial cellulase [2]. Although fungi such as Trichoderma, Aspergillus, Penicillium, Phanerochaete, and Fomitopsis have been widely studied in recent years, researchers have also been paying attention to various bacteria that produce cellulases because of their fast growth, expression of multienzyme complexes, and resistance to extreme environments [3–8]. Bacteria belonging to the genera Clostridium, Cellulomonas, Cellulosimicrobium, Thermomonospora, Bacillus, Ruminococcus, Erwinia, Bacteriodes, Acetovibrio, Streptomyces, Microbispora, Fibrobacter, and Paenibacillus have been observed to produce different kinds of cellulase when incubated under anaerobic or aerobic conditions [4, 9, 10].

Several studies have been carried out to investigate the carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) activity of aerobic bacteria. For instance, a maximum CMCase activity (0.48 U/mL) of Acinetobacter anitratus was observed in the late logarithm phase [11]. Rastogi et al. reported that a maximum CMCase activity of 0.02 and 0.058 U/mL was exhibited by Brevibacillus sp. DUSELG12 and Geobacillus sp. DUSELR7 on days 10 and 7, respectively [12]. Furthermore, Gupta et al. isolated several cellulose-degrading bacteria exhibiting CMCase activities in the range of 0.162–0.400 U/mL [13].

With regard to studies on optimization of cellulase production by aerobic bacteria, Deka et al. used response surface methodology and found that Bacillus subtilis AS3 exhibited a maximum CMCase activity of 0.43 U/mL [14]. Furthermore, using response surface methodology and orthogonal experiment design for medium optimization, Da Vinha et al. and Sheng et al. observed a maximum CMCase activity of 2.0 and 1.432 U/mL by Streptomyces viridobrunneus SCPE-09 and Pseudomonas sp. HP207, respectively [15, 16]. Thus, isolation of aerobic bacterial strains producing higher cellulase activity is gaining increasing interest.

In this study, diverse aerobic bacteria capable of hydrolyzing cellulose were isolated from the subtropical region of China, with Burkholderia sp. being the most ubiquitous. Furthermore, a bacterial strain ME27-1, producing CMCase at 2.08 U/mL after optimization of culture conditions, was isolated and identified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Soil Samples

The soil samples used in this study were collected from Maoer Mountain (Guilin City), Longgang (Chongzuo City), Dawang Ridge (Baise City), Huaping (Guilin City), Shankou Halodrymium (Beihai City) Natural Reserves, a starch factory in Fangchenggang City, a bagasse compost at the experimental farm of Guangxi University (Nanning City) in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, and Baima Snow Mountain Natural Reserve in Yunnan Province, China. The samples were taken from organic-rich soil.

2.2. Strain Isolation and Screening

The soil sample suspensions were inoculated on Czapek's medium [17] containing sugarcane bagasse pulp (in g/L: NaNO3, 2; MgSO4 ·7H2O, 0.5; NaCl, 0.5; FeSO4 ·7H2O, 0.01; KH2PO4, 1.0; yeast extract, 0.4; pulp, 5 (containing 80% water); and agar, 15.0; pH 5.0) and incubated at 28°C. Subsequently, single colonies were picked using an inoculating needle and inoculated onto Mandels and Reese medium [18] containing carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMC-Na; in g/L: KH2PO4, 2.0; (NH4)2SO4, 1.4; MgSO4 ·7H2O, 0.3; CaCl2, 0.3; yeast extract, 0.4; FeSO4 ·7H2O, 0.005; MnSO4, 0.0016; ZnCl2, 0.0017; CoCl2, 0.002; CMC-Na, 5.0; and agar, 15.0; pH 5.0). After incubation at 28°C for 48 h, all the plates were stained with 1% (w/v) Congo-red solution for 15 min and discolored with 1 M NaCl for 15 min [19]. The degradation zones were visible around the bacteria, showing that the strains could hydrolyze CMC.

The modified Mandels medium (also called basal medium) used for CMCase production by the isolates contained the following components (in g/L: KH2PO4, 1.5; Na2HPO4 ·7H2O, 2.5; (NH4)2SO4, 1.5; MgSO4 ·7H2O, 0.3; CaCl2, 0.1; FeSO4 ·7H2O, 0.005; MnSO4, 0.0016; ZnCl2, 0.0017; and CoCl2, 0.002; pH 7.0). The bacterial isolates were precultured overnight in general bacteria medium (in g/L: beef extract, 2; yeast extract, 2; sucrose, 6; and peptone, 5) at 28°C and 180 rpm. Subsequently, 2 mL of the culture was inoculated into 250 mL conical flask containing 50 mL of basal medium with 10 g/L of CMC-Na as the sole carbon source and incubated at 28°C and 180 rpm for 60 h.

2.3. Enzyme Assay

Enzyme production during cultivation was assayed at 12 h intervals up to 3 days. The cultures were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were collected as crude enzyme for enzyme assay. CMCase, Avicel cellulase (Avicelase), and filter-paper cellulase (FPase) activities were determined using the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method [20]. The reaction systems were prepared as follows: 250 μL of crude enzyme (appropriately diluted) mixed with 250 μL of 2% (w/v) CMC for determining the CMCase activity; 500 μL of enzyme mixed with 1 mL of Avicel (1%, w/v) for determining the Avicelase activity; and 500 μL of enzyme mixed with 50 mg of Whatman number 1 filter paper (1.0 × 6.0 cm) in 1 mL of buffer for determining the FPase activity. The buffer used for dissolving or resuspending the substrates was 100 mM sodium citrate buffer (pH 5.5). The mixtures were incubated at 50°C for 30 min for CMCase assay and for 1 h for Avicelase and FPase assay, respectively. Then, the reactions were stopped by adding 1 mL of DNS reagent for CMCase assay and 3 mL of DNS reagent for Avicelase and FPase assay, respectively. All the mixtures were heated in boiling water for 5 min for color development. Subsequently, 200 μL of each sample was transferred to 96-well microplate and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm [21, 22]. One unit (U) of the enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that released 1 μmol of reducing sugars equivalent to glucose per minute during the reaction.

The activity of β-glucosidase was measured by using p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside (p-NPG) as substrate. The enzyme activity was determined by detecting the amount of p-nitrophenol (p-NP) produced from p-NPG [23]. One unit (U) of β-glucosidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme liberating 1 μmol of p-NP per minute.

2.4. 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis of the CMC-Degrading Isolates

The CMC-degrading isolates were cultivated in general bacteria medium at 28°C for 24 h. The culture was directly used for the amplification of bacterial 16S rRNA gene by PCR [24]. Two universal 16S rRNA gene primers (F27: 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′ and R1492: 5′-TACGGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) were used [25]. The 25 μL mixtures were composed of 1 μL of bacterial culture as template DNA, 12.5 μL of 2 × Taq PCR Master Mix (containing 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase/μL, 500 μM of each dNTP, 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 100 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, and bromophenol blue, purchased from Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China), 1 μL of each primer (10 μM), and 9.5 μL of double-distilled H2O. The PCR procedure employed was as follows: primary denaturation for 5 min at 94°C; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s; annealing at 55°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 100 s; and an additional reaction for 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were detected on 0.8% agarose gel to confirm its purity, quantity, and size. The PCR products were sent to Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., China, for sequencing.

The 16S rRNA gene sequences were compared with other 16S rRNA gene sequences available in GenBank by using the BLASTN program (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and aligned with similar sequences by using CLUSTX program. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by applying the neighbor-joining method using MAGA4.1 program based on Kimura-2 parameters with 1000 replicates of bootstrap values [26].

2.5. Morphological, Physiological, and Biochemical Identification of the Bacterial Strain ME27-1

The morphological properties of the strain ME27-1, including shape, size, colony characteristics (color, shape, surface, elevation, and edge), and Gram staining were evaluated [27]. The physiological and biochemical characterization of the strain ME27-1 was carried out by using API 50CHB microtests (bioMérieux).

2.6. Optimization of Cultivation Conditions for CMCase Production by the Strain ME27-1

The effect of initial pH and temperature on CMCase production by the strain ME27-1 was determined by cultivating the strain in 50 mL of basal medium containing 10 g/L of CMC-Na at various pH (ranging from 5.0 to 10.0 with an interval of 0.5) and temperatures (26–34°C) for 60 h at 180 rpm.

The effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on cellulase production by the strain ME27-1 was determined by using 11 different carbon sources (fructose, glucose, glycerol, lactose, sucrose, maltose, CMC-Na, filter paper (chopped into 20 mesh size), Avicel, soluble starch, and wheat bran which was chopped into 80 mesh size) and 10 different nitrogen sources as below: (NH4)2SO4, NH4NO3, NaNO3, KNO3, NH4Cl, urea, soybean, yeast extract, tryptone, and beef extract. The carbon sources were used at a concentration of 10 g/L, instead of the carbon source in the basal medium. Furthermore, different concentrations (10–100 g/L with an interval of 10 g/L) of optimal carbon source were examined. Similarly, the effect of nitrogen sources was also studied with an initial concentration of 1.5 g/L.

The effect of different inoculum sizes (2%, 4%, 6%, 8%, and 10%) on enzyme production was tested. All media were in pH 8.0. All the flasks were incubated at 28°C. The CMCase activity was detected at an interval of 12 h.

2.7. Properties of CMCase Produced by the Bacterial Strain ME27-1

To determine the optimal pH, 250 μL of crude CMCase supernatant was incubated with 250 μL of CMC-Na (2%, w/v) at 50°C and different pH (3.0–11.0 with an interval of 0.5), respectively. To observe the effect of temperature, CMCase was incubated with 2% CMC-Na at a pH of 5.5 and temperature ranging from 30 to 75°C with an interval of 5°C. The maximum CMCase activity obtained at different pH and temperatures was considered to be 100%.

The effect of pH on the stability of CMCase was studied by mixing the crude enzyme with different buffers (1 : 9, v/v) with pH ranging from 3.0 to 10.0. The CMCase activity of the crude enzyme after incubating at 4°C for 24 h at different pH was detected. To study the thermostability of the CMCase produced by the strain ME27-1, the crude enzyme was preincubated at different temperatures (varying from 30 to 75°C with an interval of 5°C) for 1 h. The residual CMCase activity was detected. The maximum CMCase activity obtained at pH 3.0–10.0 or temperature 30–75°C was considered to be 100%. All the enzyme assays were carried out in triplicate.

2.8. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

All the DNA sequences of the partial 16S rRNA genes of the 22 strains reported in this study have been deposited into the GenBank database under the accession numbers from KF536877 to KF536898.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Isolation and Screening of Cellulose-Degrading Bacteria

A total of 245 cellulose-degrading aerobic bacterial strains were isolated from different natural reserves in the subtropical region of China, which were cultured in agar medium containing sugarcane bagasse pulp as the sole carbon source. Out of these strains, 22 isolates showed hydrolyzing zones on agar plates containing CMC-Na after Congo-red staining (Figure 1). The hydrolyzing zone diameter and colony diameter are listed in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Hydrolyzing zones produced by bacterial strains on agar plates containing CMC after Congo-red staining. (a) Strain BS16-3, (b) strain FCD1-3, (c) strain FCD2-1, (d) strain FCD3-5, (e) strain FCD7-2, (f) strain SK3-4, and (CK) Escherichia coli DH5α.

Table 1.

Cellulose-degrading bacteria isolated from different natural reserves of subtropical region in China.

Strains Location D/d (mm) CMCase activity (U/mL) Max identity (%) Strain of closest match Identification
BM17-1 Baima Snow Mountains 24/1.9 ND 99 Burkholderia sp. bB24(JF772524) Burkholderia
BM19-6 23/1.8 ND 99 Burkholderia sp. bB24(JF772524) Burkholderia
BM19-8 25/2.3 ND 99 Burkholderia sp. bB24(JF772524) Burkholderia
BS16-3 Dawang Ridge 30/5 ND 99 Bacillus anthracis JN22(KF150341) Bacillus
DF2-1 Nanning city 31/2.7 ND 99 Bacillus subtilis 0–2 (FJ959367) Bacillus
FCD1-3 Fangchenggang city 34/2 0.06 ± 0.002 99 Arthrobacter sp. Am13(KC853144) Arthrobacter
FCD2-1 20/2.2 ND 100 Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 49709(AY741349) Burkholderia
FCD2-2 25/2.4 ND 99 Enterobacter aerogenes T2(GU265554) Enterobacter
FCD3-5 28/3 ND 99 Chryseobacterium sp. TS35(HQ647281) Chryseobacterium
FCD6-1 20/2 ND 99 Burkholderia sp. D414(KF601211) Burkholderia
FCD7-2 28/2.6 ND 99 Burkholderia sp. B26(KF788047) Burkholderia
FCD11-1 24/1.5 ND 99 Arthrobacter woluwensis A12-1(AB244301) Arthrobacter
HPA16-1 Huaping 24/2.5 ND 98 Pandoraea norimbergensis CCUG 39188(AY268174) Pandoraea
HPA21-1 30/2.3 ND 99 Citrobacter freundii KUDC1770(KC355277) Citrobacter
HPC15-3 25/2 ND 98 Citrobacter freundii KUDC1770(KC355277) Citrobacter
ME27-1 Maoer Mountains 30/3 0.17 ± 0.005 99 Paenibacillus terrae AM141(AF391124) Paenibacillus  terrae
ME43-1 29/3.5 ND 99 Dyella sp. BM6(HM057825) Dyella
ME59-1 29/2.7 ND 99 Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 21809(AY741338) Burkholderia
ME59-2 26/2.5 ND 99 Burkholderia cepacia ATCC 21809(AY741338) Burkholderia
ME67-3 31/3.4 ND 99 Pseudomonas sp. CK57(EU686687) Pseudomonas
NG5-2 Longgang 20/2 ND 99 Citrobacter freundii AtetA(KF245926) Citrobacter
SK3-4 Shankou Halodrymium 43/4.6 0.01 ± 0.001 99 Bacillus subtilis IARI-NIAW1-13(KF054916) Bacillus
Open in a new tab

“D/d”: hydrolyzed zone diameter/colony diameter on agar media containing CMC as sole carbon source; “ND”: no detectable activity.

Among the 22 isolates, only three isolates (ME27-1, FCD1-3, and SK3-4) were found to produce measurable CMCase after liquid cultivation, and isolate ME27-1 showed the highest CMCase activity (0.17 U/mL) after incubation for 60 h in basal liquid medium containing 10 g/L of CMC-Na (Table 1). The CMCase activity of the other 19 strains was undetectable after cultivating in various liquid media for up to 6 days, and the Avicelase, FPase, and β-glucosidase activities of all the 22 bacterial strains were also undetectable.

Congo-red staining has been widely used in many studies for screening cellulose-degrading microorganisms. Although Teather and Wood described the relationship between the diameter of hydrolyzing zone and log enzyme concentration, this correlation could not represent the enzyme-producing ability of the microorganisms [19]. In the present study, although some strains presented large and clear hydrolyzing zones, the activities of CMCase and other cellulases produced by them were undetectable in various liquid media containing CMC and other cellulosic materials, suggesting that either the concentration of the enzyme produced by these strains was very low to be detected after cultivation in liquid medium or the ability of the strains to secrete CMCase was weak. Sadhu and Maiti also reported that the diameter of the hydrolyzing zone may not accurately reflect the real cellulase activity [28].

In general, aerobic bacteria produce low levels of Avicelase, FPase, and β-glucosidase. In a study carried out by Rastogi et al., Brevibacillus sp. DUSELG12 and Geobacillus sp. DUSELR7 were found to produce a maximum FPase activity of 0.027 and 0.043 U/mL on days 7 and 8, respectively [12]. Recently, Soares et al. found that only 9.1% of bacterial strains were able to degrade Avicel on agar plates [7].

3.2. Identification of Cellulose-Degrading Bacteria

The DNA fragments containing partial 16S rRNA genes of the 22 isolates were amplified and sequenced. The sequences obtained were matched with those available in GenBank, which revealed maximum identity of these isolates and allowed identification of these cellulose-degrading bacterial strains (Table 1).

It was found that the 22 aerobic bacterial strains that could hydrolyze cellulose belonged to 10 different genera: Burkholderia (36.36%), Bacillus (13.65%), Citrobacter (13.65%), Arthrobacter (9.10%), Enterobacter (4.54%), Chryseobacterium (4.54%), Pandoraea (4.54%), Paenibacillus (4.54%), Dyella (4.54%), and Pseudomonas (4.54%). The phylogenetic tree of the 22 strains was constructed by using MAGA4.1 program (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic tree for the 22 strains and related bacterial strains. The accession numbers of the strains are given in brackets.

Various cellulose-degrading bacteria have been found in different environments. The genus Burkholderia was observed to be the main cellulose-hydrolyzing bacteria and was considered to play an important role in cellulose degradation in the subtropical region of China in this study. In addition, bacteria belonging to the genera Arthrobacter, Chryseobacterium, Pandoraea, and Dyella were also found to be cellulolytic in the present study, which have been rarely reported as cellulose-degrading bacteria. In a previous study, Lo et al. reported that the cellulase-producing bacterial strains isolated from a rice field in southern Taiwan mainly belonged to the genus Cellulomonas [9]. On the other hand, Bacillus was reported to be the dominant cellulose-degrading bacteria in samples collected from paper mill sludges and organic fertilizers from Red Rock, Canada, as well as in those from soil, compost, and animal waste slurry from Jeju Island [29, 30]. Similarly, Burkholderia was found to be the main genus of cellulase-producing bacteria in the subtropical rainforest in Okinawa Island, Japan [31].

The strain ME27-1, with higher CMCase activity, was thoroughly examined. The partial 16S rRNA gene (1309 bp) from the strain ME27-1 showed a maximum identity of 99% with that of Paenibacillus terrae AM141T (T: type strain). Morphological tests revealed that the cells of the strain ME27-1 were rod-shaped, endospore-forming, Gram-positive, and 0.8 × 1.9–3.2 μm in size. The appearance of the colony on the TSA medium was cream-colored, moist, irregular, swollen, and pigment-free. The biochemical properties of the strain ME27-1 are listed in Table 2. The morphological, physiological, and biochemical properties of the strain ME27-1 were found to be mostly similar to those of P. terrae [27]. Thus, the strain ME27-1 was identified as P. terrae.

Table 2.

Physiological and biochemical properties of strain ME27-1.

Characteristics Reaction
Motility +
Catalase +
H2S production −
Nitrate reduction +
Hydrolyzing ability  
 Starch +
 Gelatin +
Acid fermentation  
 Glycerol −
 Ribose +
  β-Methyl-D-xyloside −
 Mannose +
 Inositol −
  α-Methyl-glucoside +
 Esculin +
 Lactose +
 Synanthrin −
 Glycogen +
 D-Lyxose −
 D(L)-Arabitol −
 5-Keto-gluconate −
 Erythritol −
 D-Xylose +
 Galactose −
 Sorbose −
 Mannitol −
 N-Acetyl-glucosamine −
 Salicine +
 Melibiose +
 Melezitose −
 Xylitol −
 D-Tagatose −
 D-Arabinose −
 L-Xylose +
 Glucose −
 Rhamnose −
 Sorbitol −
 Amygdalin +
 Cellobiose +
 Sucrose +
 Raffinose +
 Gentiobiose +
 D-Fucose −
 Gluconate −
 L-Arabinose +
 Adonitol −
 Fructose +
 Dulcitol −
  α-Methyl-D-xyloside −
 Arbutin +
 Maltose +
 Trehalose +
 Starch +
 D-Turanose −
 L-Fucose −
 2-Keto-gluconate −
Open in a new tab

“+”: positive reaction; “−”: negative reaction.

To our knowledge, till date, no study has reported about CMCase production by P. terrae, although other species of Paenibacillus have been found to produce cellulase. Some CMCase genes cloned from Paenibacillus polymyxa GS01, Paenibacillus barcinonensis, Paenibacillus xylanilyticus KJ-03, and Paenibacillus cookii SS-24 have been expressed in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae [32–35]. On the other hand, CMCases from Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6, Paenibacillus campinasensis BL11, Paenibacillus sp. B39, and P. polymyxa have been purified [36–39].

3.3. Effect of Initial pH, Temperature, Carbon and Nitrogen Sources, Inoculum Size, and Incubation Time on CMCase Production by P. terrae ME27-1

The best incubation conditions were pH 8.0 and 28°C (Figures 3(a) and 3(b)). The CMCase activity declined when the initial pH and incubation temperature were not optimal. There have been diverse reports on the optimal initial pH and temperature for cellulolytic enzyme production by Paenibacillus sp. In a previous study, P. curdlanolyticus B-6 was cultivated for enzyme production at pH 7.0 and 37°C [5]. Furthermore, Kumar et al. reported that the optimal initial pH and temperature for CMCase production by P. polymyxa were 5.5 and 37°C, respectively [39]. Yoon et al. accounted that the optimal growth temperature for P. terrae was 30°C, which is similar to that observed for optimal CMCase production by the strain ME27-1 [27].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of initial pH and temperature on enzyme production by the strain ME27-1. (a) Initial pH. (b) Temperature (T).

Various cellulosic materials have been used to induce microorganisms to produce cellulase. When fructose and glucose were used as the sole carbon source, no CMCase activity was detected. Wheat bran induced the highest CMCase activity, which was about 2.5-fold higher than that observed in the basal medium containing CMC-Na (Figure 4(a)). The optimal concentration of wheat bran in the medium was found to be 50 g/L (Figure 4(b)). Da Vinha et al. used steam-pretreated sugarcane bagasse (or wheat bran) as the main carbon source and found that wheat bran was the best inducer for CMCase production by S. viridobrunneus SCPE-09 [15]. Gao et al. demonstrated that rice bran was the optimal carbon source for CMCase production by Cellulophaga lytica LBH-14, while Kumar et al. reported that high CMCase production by P. polymyxa was obtained when using mango peel as substrate [39, 40]. In addition, wheat straw, rice straw, and xylan have been reported to be good carbon sources for CMCase production by Cellulomonas sp. and Cellulosimicrobium cellulans [9, 41].

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Effect of carbon and nitrogen sources on CMCase production by the strain ME27-1. (a) Different carbon sources: 1 ~ 9 represented glycerol, lactose, sucrose, maltose, CMC-Na, filter paper, Avicel, soluble starch, and wheat bran, respectively. (b) The concentration of wheat bran. (c) Different nitrogen sources: a ~ j represented (NH4)2SO4, NH4NO3, NaNO3, KNO3, NH4Cl, urea, soybean, yeast extract, tryptone, and beef extract, respectively. (d) The concentration of NH4Cl.

Furthermore, maximum CMCase activity was noted when using NH4Cl as the sole nitrogen source (Figure 4(c)), and the best concentration of NH4Cl in the medium was observed to be 3 g/L (Figure 4(d)). Many reports have shown that organic nitrogen sources are better than inorganic nitrogen sources [15, 16, 42, 43]. In the present study, the CMCase activity of the strain ME27-1 was higher when inorganic nitrogen sources were used as the sole nitrogen source. Likewise, Kumar et al. and Kalogeris et al. also observed a similar phenomenon in their studies [39, 44].

In addition, use of an inoculum size of 2% resulted in maximum CMCase activity after incubation of the strain for 60 h (Figure 5). There has been increasing interest in cellulase-producing bacteria because of their ability to grow fast [45]. In the present study, the strain ME27-1 produced the highest CMCase activity after 60 h of incubation. On the other hand, in previous studies, maximum CMCase activity of Pseudomonas sp. HP207 and S. viridobrunneus SCPE-09 was observed after 24 and 48 h of incubation, respectively, which is much earlier than that noted for the strain ME27-1 [15, 16]. However, different results have been reported in various studies. Maximum CMCase activity of C. lytica LBH-14 was obtained after 72 h of incubation, whereas that of Brevibacillus sp. DUSELG12 and Geobacillus sp. DUSELR7 was noted after days 9 and 7, respectively [12, 40].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effect of inoculum size and incubation period on CMCase production by the strain ME27-1. 2% (empty triangle); 4% (filled triangle); 6% (filled circle); 8% (filled square); and 10% (empty square). Error bars show the standard deviation of experimental point (n = 3).

3.4. Properties of CMCase Produced by P. terrae ME27-1

The optimum pH and temperature of CMCase produced by strain ME27-1 were found to be 5.5 and 50°C, respectively (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). The CMCase produced by the strain ME27-1 was stable from pH 4.0 to 11.0, with more than 60% CMCase activity being retained (Figure 6(c)). Furthermore, the enzyme maintained 65% activity after incubation at 4°C and pH 11.0 for 24 h. The temperature profiles demonstrated that more than 95% CMCase activity was retained at 30–45°C for 1 h (Figure 6(d)). However, the enzyme activity was reduced at temperatures above 50°C. In fact, approximately 77% residual activity was maintained after preincubating the enzyme at 50°C for 1 h.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Properties of CMCase produced by the strain ME27-1. (a) Effect of pH on CMCase activity. (b) Effect of temperature on CMCase activity. (c) Effect of pH on the stability of CMCase. (d) Thermostability of CMCase. The different buffers used are as follows (100 mM): sodium citrate buffer (empty square; pH 3.0–6.5), Na2HPO4-NaH2PO4 buffer (filled square; pH 6.5–7.5), Tris-HCl buffer (empty triangle; pH 7.5–8.5), and glycine-NaOH buffer (filled triangle; pH 8.5–11.0). Error bars show the standard deviation of experimental point (n = 2).

Similar results were observed for cellulases produced by S. viridobrunneus SCPE-09 and P. cookii SS-24, with an optimal pH of 5.0 and 5.1 and an optimal temperature of 50° and 55°C, respectively [15, 35]. However, maximum CMCase activity of bacteria at pH lower than 6.0 has been rarely observed, and the maximum CMCase activities of P. campinasensis BL11, P. polymyxa GS01, Paenibacillus sp. B39, and Bacillus mycoides S122C were observed at neutral or alkaline conditions [37, 38, 46, 47]. In the present study, the CMCase produced by the strain ME27-1 was stable at pH 5.0–9.5, and almost 85% residual activity was retained. Only a few studies have reported that CMCase was stable at such a wide pH range; for example, Da Vinha et al. reported the 60% CMCase activity was retained within the pH range of 3.0–8.0 [15].

3.5. Comparison of CMCase Production by P. terrae ME27-1 and Other Microorganisms

When measured at the optimal pH and temperature of CMCase, P. terrae ME27-1 produced CMCase activity of 2.08 U/mL under the optimized cultivation conditions, which was a 12-fold improvement in the CMCase production. This yield of CMCase production was higher than most of the aerobic bacterial strains but less than some of aerobic bacterial strains that have been exploited previously (Table 3). However, the CMCase production by P. terrae ME27-1 was lower than that by several anaerobic bacterial strains, for example, Clostridium papyrosolvens CFR-703, C. thermocellum YM4, C. thermocopriae JT3-3 (Table 3). Some anaerobic bacteria can degrade lignocellulosic substrates efficiently by producing multienzyme complex termed cellulosome [36]. The carbohydrate binding modules and different proteins in the cellulosome allow the whole enzyme complex to bind to the substrates, which avoids the wasteful expenditure of energy of bacteria releasing large amounts of individual enzymes and makes lots of advantages over single-enzyme system [4, 48].

Table 3.

Comparison of CMCase production by Paenibacillus terrae ME27-1 with other bacterial and fungal strains.

Strains Carbon source Nitrogen source Aerobic/anaerobic CMCase activity (U/mL) Ref.
P.  terrae ME27-1 Wheat bran N H 4 C l Aerobic 2.08 This study
Acinetobacter anitratus CMC (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 0.48 [11]
Branhamella sp. CMC (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 2.56 [11]
Bacillus subtilis AS3 CMC Peptone, yeast extract Aerobic 0.43 [14]
B. pumilus EWBCM1 Galactose Malt extract, H8MoN2O4 Aerobic 0.58 [49]
B. pumilus BpCRI 6 CMC, glycerol Tryptone Aerobic 1.90 [50]
Pseudomonas sp. HP207 CMC–Na Yeast extract Aerobic 1.43 [16]
Streptomyces viridobrunneus SCPE-09 Wheat bran Corn steep liquid Aerobic 2.00 [15]
S. drozdowiczii CMC Yeast extract Aerobic 0.59 [51]
Streptomyces sp. J2 Starch, glucose NH4Cl Aerobic 0.43 [52]
Streptomyces sp. SLBA-08 Sisal bagasse (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 1.11 [53]
S. griseoaurantiacus ZQBC691 CMC (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 37.38 [54]
Clostridium thermocellum YM4 Solka floe NH4Cl Anaerobic 6.70 [55]
C. thermocopriae JT3-3 Cellulose MN300 Yeast extract, urea Anaerobic 4.53 [56]
C. papyrosolvens CFR-703 Cellulose Yeast extract Anaerobic 45.00 [57]
Geobacillus sp. T1 Barley straw NH4Cl Aerobic 143.50 [58]
Chaetomium globosum 414 OPEFB Peptone Aerobic 30.80 [59]
Chalara paradoxa CH32 Glucose Malt extract, yeast extract Aerobic 0.25 [60]
Aspergillus awamori 2B.361 U2/1 Wheat bran Yeast extract, NaNO3 Aerobic 4.90 [61]
Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 Wheat bran Yeast extract, NaNO3 Aerobic 20.00 [61]
Penicillium janthinellum NCIM 1171 CP-123 (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 111.80 [62]
T. viride NCIM 1051 CP-123 (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 140.70 [62]
P. decumbens JU-A10 Wheat bran NaNO3, urea Aerobic 10.60 [63]
P. pinophilum Wheat bran (NH4)2SO4 Aerobic 65.00 [64]
Neocallimastix sp. R1 Wheat straw Trypticase peptone, NH4Cl Anaerobic 0.19 [65]
N. frontalis PN-1 Filter paper strip (NH4)2SO4 Anaerobic 0.94 [66]
Neurospora crassa Wheat straw Yeast extract Aerobic 19.70 [67]
Trichoderma sp. A-001 Filter paper KNO3 Aerobic 167.00 [68]
Volvariella volvacea Avicel Yeast extract, NH4NO3 Aerobic 0.64 [69]
Open in a new tab

CMC: carboxymethyl cellulose; OPEFB: oil palm empty-fruit-bunch fibres; CP-123: cellulose powder 123.

Furthermore, the CMCase produced by P. terrae ME27-1 was lower than that by most aerobic fungal strains while it was higher than that by anaerobic fungal strains (Table 3). The CMCase production by most bacteria was usually lower than that by aerobic fungal strains. Genomic analysis showed that less glycosyl hydrolases existed in aerobic bacterial strains than aerobic fungal strains, which may explain why aerobic bacteria usually produce lower CMCase activity [48].

4. Conclusion

Ten genera of bacteria hydrolyzing cellulose were isolated from different natural reserves in the subtropical region of China, and the genus Burkholderia was found to be the most prevalent and predominant. The strain ME27-1, identified to be P. terrae, showed the highest CMCase activity among the 22 strains isolated, and after optimization of the cultivation conditions, the enzyme activity was significantly improved to 2.08 U/mL. This bacterial species has been rarely found to produce cellulase. Thus, this study revealed the diversity of cellulose-degrading bacteria in the subtropical region of China and found that P. terrae ME27-1 was a good CMCase producer.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a Grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30960013), a Grant from the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (2012GXNSFGA060005), and the Bagui Scholar Program of Guangxi (2011A001).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Brás JLA, Cartmell A, Carvalho ALM, et al. Structural insights into a unique cellulase fold and mechanism of cellulose hydrolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(13):5237–5242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1015006108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP. Cellulases from Penicillium species for producing fuels from biomass. Biofuels. 2012;3(4):463–477. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Martins LF, Kolling D, Camassola M, Dillon AJP, Ramos LP. Comparison of Penicillium echinulatum and Trichoderma reesei cellulases in relation to their activity against various cellulosic substrates. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99(5):1417–1424. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Maki M, Leung KT, Qin W. The prospects of cellulase-producing bacteria for the bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass. International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2009;5(5):500–516. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.5.500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Waeonukul R, Kyu KL, Sakka K, Ratanakhanokchai K. Isolation and characterization of a multienzyme complex (cellulosome) of the Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus B-6 grown on Avicel under aerobic conditions. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering. 2009;107(6):610–614. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deswal D, Khasa YP, Kuhad RC. Optimization of cellulase production by a brown rot fungus Fomitopsis sp. RCK2010 under solid state fermentation. Bioresource Technology. 2011;102(10):6065–6072. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Soares FL, Jr., Melo IS, Dias ACF, Andreote FD. Cellulolytic bacteria from soils in harsh environments. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;28(5):2195–2203. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1025-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Marjamaa K, Toth K, Bromann PA, Szakacs G, Kruus K. Novel Penicillium cellulases for total hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2013;52(6-7):358–369. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2013.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lo Y-C, Saratale GD, Chen W-M, Bai M-D, Chang J-S. Isolation of cellulose-hydrolytic bacteria and applications of the cellulolytic enzymes for cellulosic biohydrogen production. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2009;44(6-7):417–425. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wilson DB. Microbial diversity of cellulose hydrolysis. Current Opinion in Microbiology. 2011;14(3):259–263. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ekperigin MM. Preliminary studies of cellulase production by Acinetobacter anitratus and Branhamella sp. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2007;6(1):028–033. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rastogi G, Muppidi GL, Gurram RN, et al. Isolation and characterization of cellulose-degrading bacteria from the deep subsurface of the Homestake gold mine, Lead, South Dakota, USA. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2009;36(4):585–598. doi: 10.1007/s10295-009-0528-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Gupta P, Samant K, Sahu A. Isolation of cellulose-degrading bacteria and determination of their cellulolytic potential. International Journal of Microbiology. 2012;2012:5 pages. doi: 10.1155/2012/578925.578925 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Deka D, Bhargavi P, Sharma A, Goyal D, Jawed M, Goyal A. Enhancement of cellulase activity from a new strain of Bacillus subtilis by medium optimization and analysis with various cellulosic substrates. Enzyme Research. 2011;2011(1) doi: 10.4061/2011/151656.151656 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Da Vinha FNM, Gravina-Oliveira MP, Franco MN, et al. Cellulase production by Streptomyces viridobrunneus SCPE-09 using lignocellulosic biomass as inducer substrate. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2011;164(3):256–267. doi: 10.1007/s12010-010-9132-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sheng P, Huang S, Wang Q, Wang A, Zhang H. Isolation, screening, and optimization of the fermentation conditions of highly cellulolytic bacteria from the hindgut of Holotrichia parallela larvae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2012;167(2):270–284. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9670-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wolf FT. The production of indole acetic acid by Ustilago zeae, and its possible significance in tumor formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1952;38(2):106–111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.38.2.106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mandels M, Reese ET. Induction of cellulase in Trichoderma viride as influenced by carbon sources and metals. Journal of Bacteriology. 1957;73(2):269–278. doi: 10.1128/jb.73.2.269-278.1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Teather RM, Wood PJ. Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1982;43(4):777–780. doi: 10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miller GL. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Analytical Chemistry. 1959;31(3):426–428. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activity. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1987;59(2):257–268. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rawat R, Tewari L. Purification and characterization of an acidothermophilic cellulase enzyme produced by Bacillus subtilis strain LFS3. Extremophiles. 2012;16(4):637–644. doi: 10.1007/s00792-012-0463-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Feng Y, Duan C-J, Pang H, et al. Cloning and identification of novel cellulase genes from uncultured microorganisms in rabbit cecum and characterization of the expressed cellulases. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2007;75(2):319–328. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0820-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(12):6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 1991. pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kumar S, Nei M, Dudley J, Tamura K. MEGA: a biologist-centric software for evolutionary analysis of DNA and protein sequences. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2008;9(4):299–306. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbn017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yoon J-H, Oh H-M, Yoon B-D, Kang KH, Park Y-H. Paenibacillus kribbensis sp. nov. and Paenibacillus terrae sp. nov., bioflocculants for efficient harvesting of algal cells. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2003;53(1):295–301. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02108-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sadhu S, Maiti TK. Cellulase production by bacteria: a review. British Microbiology Research Journal. 2013;3(3):235–258. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Maki ML, Broere M, Leung KT, Qin W. Characterization of some efficient cellulase producing bacteria isolated from paper mill sludges and organic fertilizers. International Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 2011;2(2):146–154. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kim YK, Lee SC, Cho YY, Oh HJ, Ko YH. Isolation of cellulolytic Bacillus subtilis strains from agricultural environments. ISRN Microbiology. 2012;2012:9 pages. doi: 10.5402/2012/650563.650563 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Fujii K, Oosugi A, Sekiuchi S. Cellulolytic microbes in the Yanbaru, a subtropical rainforest with an endemic biota on Okinawa Island, Japan. Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry. 2012;76(5):906–911. doi: 10.1271/bbb.110881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cho KM, Hong SY, Lee SM, et al. A cel44C-man26A gene of endophytic Paenibacillus polymyxa GS01 has multi-glycosyl hydrolases in two catalytic domains. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006;73(3):618–630. doi: 10.1007/s00253-006-0523-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mormeneo M, Pastor FJ, Zueco J. Efficient expression of a Paenibacillus barcinonensis endoglucanase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;39(1):115–123. doi: 10.1007/s10295-011-1006-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Park I-H, Chang J, Lee Y-S, Fang S-J, Choi Y-L. Gene cloning of endoglucanase Cel5A from cellulose-degrading Paenibacillus xylanilyticus KJ-03 and purification and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Protein Journal. 2012;31(3):238–245. doi: 10.1007/s10930-012-9396-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shinoda S, Kanamasa S, Arai M. Cloning of an endoglycanase gene from Paenibacillus cookii and characterization of the recombinant enzyme. Biotechnology Letters. 2012;34(2):281–286. doi: 10.1007/s10529-011-0759-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pason P, Kyu KL, Ratanakhanokchai K. Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus strain B-6 xylanolytic-cellulolytic enzyme system that degrades insoluble polysaccharides. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72(4):2483–2490. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.4.2483-2490.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ko C-H, Chen W-L, Tsai C-H, Jane W-N, Liu C-C, Tu J. Paenibacillus campinasensis BL11: a wood material-utilizing bacterial strain isolated from black liquor. Bioresource Technology. 2007;98(14):2727–2733. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wang C-M, Shyu C-L, Ho S-P, Chiou S-H. Characterization of a novel thermophilic, cellulose-degrading bacterium Paenibacillus sp. strain B39. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2008;47(1):46–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02385.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kumar D, Ashfaque M, Muthukumar M, Singh M, Garg N. Production and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulase from Paenibacillus polymyxa using mango peel as substrate. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2012;33(1):81–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Gao W, Lee E-J, Lee S-U, Li J, Chung C-H, Lee J-W. Enhanced carboxymethylcellulase production by a newly isolated marine bacterium, Cellulophaga lytica LBH-14, using rice bran. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;22(10):1412–1422. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1203.03009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wen B, Yuan X, Cao Y, Liu Y, Wang X, Cui Z. Optimization of liquid fermentation of microbial consortium WSD-5 followed by saccharification and acidification of wheat straw. Bioresource Technology. 2012;118:141–149. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Geetha K, Gunasekaran P. Optimization of nutrient medium containing agricultural waste for xylanase production by Bacillus pumilus B20. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2010;15(5):882–889. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kim H-J, Lee Y-J, Gao W, Chung C-H, Son C-W, Lee J-W. Statistical optimization of fermentation conditions and comparison of their influences on production of cellulases by a psychrophilic marine bacterium, Psychrobacter aquimaris LBH-10 using orthogonal array method. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2011;16(3):542–548. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kalogeris E, Christakopoulos P, Katapodis P, et al. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from the thermophilic fungus Thermoascus aurantiacus under solid state cultivation of agricultural wastes. Process Biochemistry. 2003;38(7):1099–1104. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lu W-J, Wang H-T, Yang S-J, Wang Z-C, Nie Y-F. Isolation and characterization of mesophilic cellulose-degrading bacteria from flower stalks-vegetable waste co-composting system. Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 2006;51(6):353–360. doi: 10.2323/jgam.51.353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kye MC, Sun JH, Math RK, et al. Cloning of two cellulase genes from endophytic Paenibacillus polymyxa GS01 and comparison with cel44C-man26A. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 2008;48(6):464–472. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200700281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Balasubramanian N, Toubarro D, Teixeira M, Simõs N. Purification and biochemical characterization of a novel thermo-stable carboxymethyl cellulase from Azorean isolate Bacillus mycoides S122C. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2012;168(8):2191–2204. doi: 10.1007/s12010-012-9929-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Brumm PJ. Bacterial genomes: what they teach us about cellulose degradation. Biofuels. 2013;4(6):669–681. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Shankar T, Isaiarasu L. Cellulase production by Bacillus pumilus EWBCM1 under varying cultural conditions. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 2011;8(1):40–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kotchoni OS, Shonukan OO, Gachomo WE. Bacillus pumilus BpCRI 6, a promising candidate for cellulase production under conditions of catabolite repression. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2003;2(6):140–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Grigorevski De Lima AL, Pires Do Nascimento R, Da Silva Bon EP, Coelho RRR. Streptomyces drozdowiczii cellulase production using agro-industrial by-products and its potential use in the detergent and textile industries. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2005;37(2):272–277. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Jaradat Z, Dawagreh A, Ababneh Q, Saadoun I. Influence of culture conditions on cellulase production by Streptomyces sp. (strain J2) Jordan Journal of Biological Science. 2008;1(4):141–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Macedo EP, Cerqueira CLO, Souza DAJ, Bispo ASR, Coelho RRR, Nascimento RP. Production of cellulose-degrading enzyme on sisal and other agro-industrial residues using a new Brazilian actinobacteria strain Streptomyces sp. SLBA-08. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering. 2013;30(4):729–735. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Chu F-J, Lin C-W, I Y-P, Wu C-H, Chen D-H. Hydrolysis of bamboo cellulose and cellulase characteristics by Streptomyces griseoaurantiacus ZQBC691. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2012;43(2):220–225. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mori Y. Comparison of the cellulolytic systems of Clostridium thermocellum YM4 and JW20. Biotechnology Letters. 1992;14(2):131–136. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jin F, Toda K. Nutrient effects on cellulase production by the new species, Clostridium thermocopriae . Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1989;31(5-6):597–600. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rani DS, Thirumale S, Nand K. Production of cellulase by Clostridium papyrosolvens CFR-703. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2004;20(6):629–632. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Assareh R, Shahbani Zahiri H, Akbari Noghabi K, Aminzadeh S, Bakhshi khaniki G. Characterization of the newly isolated Geobacillus sp. T1, the efficient cellulase-producer on untreated barley and wheat straws. Bioresource Technology. 2012;120:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Umikalsom MS, Ariff AB, Shamsuddin ZH, Tong CC, Hassan MA, Karim MIA. Production of cellulase by a wild strain of Chaetomium globosum using delignified oil palm empty-fruit-bunch fibre as substrate. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1997;47(5):590–595. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Lucas R, Robles A, García MT, De Cienfuegos GA, Gálvez A. Production, purification, and properties of an endoglucanase produced by the hyphomycete Chalara (syn. Thielaviopsis) paradoxa CH32. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2001;49(1):79–85. doi: 10.1021/jf000916p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gottschalk LMF, Oliveira RA, Bon EPDS. Cellulases, xylanases, β-glucosidase and ferulic acid esterase produced by Trichoderma and Aspergillus act synergistically in the hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2010;51(1-2):72–78. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Adsul MG, Ghule JE, Singh R, et al. Polysaccharides from bagasse: applications in cellulase and xylanase production. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2004;57(1):67–72. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Sun X, Liu Z, Zheng K, Song X, Qu Y. The composition of basal and induced cellulase systems in Penicillium decumbens under induction or repression conditions. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2008;42(7):560–567. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Singh R, Varma AJ, Seeta Laxman R, Rao M. Hydrolysis of cellulose derived from steam exploded bagasse by Penicillium cellulases: comparison with commercial cellulase. Bioresource Technology. 2009;100(24):6679–6681. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lowe SE, Theodorou MK, Trinci APJ. Cellulases and xylanase of an anaerobic rumen fungus grown on wheat straw, wheat straw holocellulose, cellulose, and xylan. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1987;53(6):1216–1223. doi: 10.1128/aem.53.6.1216-1223.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Mountfort DO, Asher RA. Production and regulation of cellulase by two strains of the rumen anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix frontalis . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1985;49(5):1314–1322. doi: 10.1128/aem.49.5.1314-1322.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Romero MD, Aguado J, González L, Ladero M. Cellulase production by Neurospora crassa on wheat straw. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1999;25(3–5):244–250. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gashe BA. Cellulase production and activity by Trichoderma sp. A-001. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1992;73(1):79–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cai YJ, Chapman SJ, Buswell JA, Chang S-T. Production and distribution of endoglucanase, cellobiohydrolase, and β- glucosidase components of the cellulolytic system of Volvariella volvacea, the edible straw mushroom. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1999;65(2):553–559. doi: 10.1128/aem.65.2.553-559.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BioMed Research International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES