Skip to main content
Frontiers in Neuroanatomy logoLink to Frontiers in Neuroanatomy
. 2014 Jul 10;8:68. doi: 10.3389/fnana.2014.00068

Matrix metalloproteinase-9 involvement in the structural plasticity of dendritic spines

Michal Stawarski 1,, Marzena Stefaniuk 2,, Jakub Wlodarczyk 1,*
PMCID: PMC4091410  PMID: 25071472

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the locus for excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain and thus play a major role in neuronal plasticity. The ability to alter synaptic connections includes volumetric changes in dendritic spines that are driven by scaffolds created by the extracellular matrix (ECM). Here, we review the effects of the proteolytic activity of ECM proteases in physiological and pathological structural plasticity. We use matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as an example of an ECM modifier that has recently emerged as a key molecule in regulating the morphology and dysmorphology of dendritic spines that underlie synaptic plasticity and neurological disorders, respectively. We summarize the influence of MMP-9 on the dynamic remodeling of the ECM via the cleavage of extracellular substrates. We discuss its role in the formation, modification, and maintenance of dendritic spines in learning and memory. Finally, we review research that implicates MMP-9 in aberrant synaptic plasticity and spine dysmorphology in neurological disorders, with a focus on morphological abnormalities of dendritic protrusions that are associated with epilepsy.

Keywords: matrix metalloproteinase-9, dendritic spines, structural synaptic plasticity, extracellular matrix, epilepsy

Introduction

Structural plasticity is an active field in neuroscience, with pivotal implications for the understanding of many different levels of learning and memory and a wide range of neurological and cognitive disorders (Sala and Segal, 2014; Penzes et al., 2011). Dendritic spines are plastic structures that undergo morphological changes in response to stimuli that modulate neuronal activity. Such remodeling underlies the formation and long-term storage of information in the brain, and spine remodeling frequently accompanies neurodegenerative diseases, i.e., ischemia (Brown et al., 2008b) or spinal cord injury (Kim et al., 2006) lead to a reduction in spine density and elongation of the remaining spines; traumatic brain injury alters dendritic spines stability (Campbell et al., 2012). The extracellular matrix (ECM) of the brain mediates structural stability by creating a scaffold for dendritic spines (de Vivo et al., 2013). ECM components do not constitute only a passive environment. Some ECM components (e.g., matrix metalloproteinase-9 [MMP-9]) also actively participate in synaptic plasticity. Growing evidence indicates a particular role for MMP-9 in the mediation of structural plasticity in the brain.

In the present review, we discuss the concept of the tetrapartite synapse, with a particular emphasis on ECM proteins, and highlight both the beneficial and detrimental roles of MMP-9 in pathological structural brain plasticity. We focus on epileptogenesis as an example of a disease in which the role of MMP-9 in aberrant synaptic plasticity and permanent impairment is particularly significant (Wilczynski et al., 2008).

Tetrapartite synapse

The first high-resolution observations of neurons by Ramón y Cajal unveiled the existence of dendritic spines, small membranous protrusions on the surface of dendrites (Ramón y Cajal, 1888, 1899). Ramón y Cajal theorized that they could be involved in signal transmission within the brain (Ramón y Cajal, 1891, 1893), giving rise to the classical theory of a dipartite synapse as a basic unit of neuronal information processing. The dipartite synapse is formed by presynaptic and postsynaptic parts that are found on presynaptic boutons and dendritic spines, respectively, separated by the synaptic cleft. In the decades that followed, research showed that this model was overly simplified, and additional players were added to the picture. The concept of a tripartite synapse appeared, in which the astrocyte, once believed to be an inert, “neuron-feeding” cell, actively participates in synaptic transmission (Araque et al., 1999). Soon new components of the synapse were discovered, giving rise to the tetrapartite or even pentapartite concept of the synapse. In one conceptualization, microglia (reviewed in De Leo et al., 2006) join pre- and postsynaptic neurons and astrocytes to form the synapse. In another conceptualization, the ECM is added as a key component of the synapse (reviewed in Dityatev and Rusakov, 2011). The ECM is a complex protein network that fills the extracellular space and is secreted by neurons, glia, and non-neuronal cells. It was previously seen as an inert component of the synapse, a scaffold that maintains synaptic integrity, with no effect on synaptic transmission. The reality, however, turned out to be quite different. Recent research has shown that the ECM actively regulates a plethora of cellular functions, from the initial establishment of the synapse to the regulation of synaptic transmission and synaptic plasticity (reviewed in Dityatev et al., 2010). The ECM has begun to be recognized as a critical factor that affects synapses by enveloping them and forming a synaptic element. ECM components with known roles in the regulation of synaptic transmission include laminin, tenascins, thrombospondin, lectins, and MMPs, to name a few (comprehensively reviewed in Dansie and Ethell, 2011). Among the numerous ECM components that have been proposed to play roles in brain plasticity, MMP-9 has recently emerged as a key molecule involved in long-term memory and the underlying synaptic changes (Rivera et al., 2010; Huntley, 2012; Tsien, 2013). The focal point of synaptic changes within the brain are dendritic spines that harbor synaptic contacts. Their stability is correlated with their shape, in which mushroom-like spines are generally more stable than thin, long spines. The size of the spine head is well known to be correlated with the area of the postsynaptic density (PSD; Harris and Stevens, 1989; Meyer et al., 2014) and AMPA receptor number (Nusser et al., 1998; Kharazia and Weinberg, 1999; Takumi et al., 1999; Szepesi et al., 2014). Dendritic spine neck length on the other hand is correlated with postsynaptic potential (Araya et al., 2006; Tønnesen et al., 2014). Thus, dendritic spine morphology has been accepted to determine the strength of synaptic connections. The structural plasticity of dendritic spines is widely seen as the basis of the primary functions of the central nervous system, including learning and memory. The influence of MMP-9 on dendritic spine morphology makes it a perfect candidate molecule for synaptic remodeling.

Matrix metalloproteinase-9

MMP-9 is a 92 kDa protein that belongs to a family of zinc- and calcium-dependent endopeptidases. Because of its ability to cleave gelatin, it is classified as a gelatinase. It is encoded in the human genome by a gene located on chromosome 20 (20q13.12). The molecular biology of MMP-9 was summarized in an excellent, exhaustive review by Vandooren et al. (2013).

MMP-9 has a complex domain structure, with a signal peptide at the N-terminus, followed by a propeptide, a catalytic domain with a zinc ion binding site, three fibronectin type II inserts, a proline-rich and heavily O-glycosylated linker, and a hemopexin domain located at the C-terminus of the protein (Stute et al., 2003). The propeptide contains an evolutionarily conserved PRCGVPDV domain that binds the zinc ion in the catalytic domain and blocks the activity of the enzyme until it is cleaved (Van Wart and Birkedal-Hansen, 1990; Becker et al., 1995). The overlapping substrate specificity of MMPs (to date, 25 MMPs have been identified in humans) is attributable to a zinc-binding motif, HExGHxxGxxH (where x signifies any amino acid), within the catalytic domain, which is shared by all MMPs. Tandemly repeated fibronectin type II inserts within the catalytic domain are responsible for gelatin binding. The linker allows for independent movement of the catalytic and hemopexin domains, which influence enzyme conformation (Rosenblum et al., 2007) and the substrate specificity of MMP-9. The hemopexin domain is able to bind an endogenous MMP-9 inhibitor called tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) and several MMP-9 substrates. It is also responsible for the membrane docking of MMP-9 (Bode et al., 1999) and formation of homo- and heterodimers with neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL; Kjeldsen et al., 1993; Cha et al., 2002).

MMP-9 is ubiquitously expressed throughout the body. Within the resting brain, it is mostly synthesized by neurons but to some extent also by glia in such structures as the hippocampus, cerebral cortex, and cerebellum. It is extracellularly secreted, although recent studies have also revealed its presence in the nucleus of muscle cells (Yeghiazaryan et al., 2012), neurons (Yang et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2012), human glial cells (Pirici et al., 2012), and mitochondria of retinal capillary cells. MMP-9 may act as a negative regulator of mitochondrial function and may be involved in apoptosis (Kowluru et al., 2011).

The expression of MMP-9 is regulated on multiple levels: (1) transcription (for a comprehensive review of the transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of MMP-9 expression, including regulation through non-coding RNAs, see Labrie and St-Pierre, 2013; several studies also indicate that reactive oxygen species (ROS) activate MMP-9 expression through AP-1 transcription factors; Hasebe et al., 2007; Hsieh et al., 2014); (2) posttranslation (also involving non-proteolytic activation); (3) local translation (Dziembowska et al., 2012); (4) sequestration on the cell membrane (e.g., binding to cell adhesion molecules, such as hyaluronian receptor CD44 (Bourguignon et al., 1998), integrins (Wang et al., 2003), lipoprotein receptor-related protein-1 (LRP-1), and megalin/LRP-2 (Van den Steen et al., 2006)); (5) internalization (Hahn-Dantona et al., 2001); and (6) delayed activation that involves cleavage of the propeptide and co-secretion with TIMP-1, its endogenous inhibitor (Sbai et al., 2010). In the brain, the primary transcriptional regulators of MMP-9 expression are AP-1 and nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB). Yin Yang 1 (YY1) was identified as a strong repressor of MMP-9 transcription in the rat hippocampus in vivo and cultured neurons (Rylski et al., 2008).

MMP-9 activation usually occurs through the cleavage of a propeptide that disrupts its zinc ion binding properties. Cleavage may also be performed by other MMPs and the tissue plasminogen activator (tPA)-plasmin system (Bruno and Cuello, 2006). However, non-proteolytic activation/inactivation is also possible through posttranslational modification. The thiol modification of methionine and cysteine residues within the catalytic domain and nitration or oxidation of the propeptide cysteine that is responsible for zinc ion binding are also able to activate MMPs without propeptide removal. Finally, nitric oxide, a commonly occurring secondary messenger in the brain, is able to regulate the stability of MMP-9 mRNA (Akool et al., 2003).

MMP-9 and TIMP-1 are secreted by neurons in a Golgi-dependent manner in 160–200 nm vesicles. The vesicles move along microtubules and microfilaments. They are distributed in the somatodendritic compartment and can be found in dendritic spines (Sbai et al., 2008).

MMP-9 regulates numerous cell activities through its involvement in matrix remodeling and the liberation of macromolecules (e.g., growth factors) that are embedded within the ECM. MMP-9 is involved in various physiological functions, such as tissue remodeling, cellular differentiation (Zimowska et al., 2013), cell-cell contact and cell migration (Kim et al., 2012), the release of cytokines and regulation of growth factor activity (Schonbeck et al., 1998), survival and apoptosis (Kowluru et al., 2011), angiogenesis, inflammation, and signaling (for a comprehensive review of MMP-9 function, see Vandooren et al., 2013; Verslegers et al., 2013). Aside from maintaining tissue homeostasis, MMP-9 plays a role in a range of pathologies (comprehensively reviewed in Rivera et al., 2010; Kaczmarek, 2013).

Polymorphisms that have been identified in the MMP-9 gene promoter ([CA]n microsatellite at position -90 and SNP at -1562) that affect the binding of nuclear proteins and thus the expression levels of the protein were correlated with an increased incidence of several pathologies in human populations (Ye, 2000). Additionally, a functional polymorphism that might affect the binding of non-coding RNAs and thus mRNA transport and translation was identified within the 3’ untranslated region of MMP-9 mRNA (Yuan et al., 2013).

The monitoring of MMP-9 activity originally took advantage of its gelatinolytic properties in the form of zymography, in which MMP-9 cleaves an FITC-tagged gelatin (DQ-gelatin). Under normal conditions, FITC fluorescence is almost completely quenched unless DQ-gelatin is cleaved by MMP-9. In such a case, fluorescence increases and can be readily monitored using confocal microscopy. However, DQ-gelatin does not enable the tracking of MMP-9 activity with high spatial and temporal resolution because it is freely diffusive. Moreover, DQ-gelatin is also cleaved by MMP-2, which generally has a much higher level of expression than MMP-9. Therefore, assays that utilize DQ-gelatin, with the exception of gel zymography, are highly nonspecific. In recent years, a number of new MMP-9 activity biosensors have been developed (Faust et al., 2008; Fudala et al., 2011; Akers et al., 2012; Gustafson et al., 2013) in response to the perceived shortcomings of classical zymographic approaches. The potential of MMP-9 as a prognostic marker of cancer led to considerable interest in developing diagnostic and analytical probes to detect the proteolytic activity of MMP-9 in cancer (for a survey of several MMP-9 activity probes used in cancer detection, see Roy et al., 2011; for a review of MMP-9 detection methods in cancer, see Scherer et al., 2008; for MMP-9 near-infrared fluorescence probes in in vivo imaging, see Wallis de Vries et al., 2009; Kaijzel et al., 2010; Akers et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2012). We recently developed a genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based MMP-9 activity biosensor (Stawarski et al., 2014) that is compatible with live cell imaging approaches and can be used to study the effects of MMP-9 on structural plasticity with very high spatiotemporal resolution. It is membrane-anchored and utilizes the teal fluorescent protein (mTFP1) as a donor of energy and two tandemly repeated Venus proteins as energy donors to increase the resonant energy transfer level (Figure 1). The biosensor was engineered for the highest possible FRET efficiency and incorporates a synthetic MMP-9 cleavage site within an α-helical region, giving the biosensor high sensitivity to MMP-9 action and improved specificity. The biosensor can be used to study the action of MMP-9 at the level of single dendritic spines, providing an opportunity to unambiguously correlate endogenous MMP-9 activity with the plastic changes of dendritic spines. Furthermore, by combining the biosensor with one of several recently described brain optical clearing techniques (several optical clearing agents were recently reviewed in Zhu et al., 2013; see also Chung et al. (2013) for CLARITY, Hama et al. (2011) for Scale and Susaki et al. (2014) for CUBIC) bridging the gap between studies of the global anatomical changes that occur because of synaptic plasticity and locally regulated extremely low-level proteolytic activity around single neurons might be possible, thus providing insights into the basic mechanisms of brain plasticity.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

MMP-9 activity detection mechanism of the biosensor. (A) In an uncleaved state, the excitation energy is transferred from mTFP1 (depicted in blue) to Venus (depicted in yellow), resulting in the fluorescence of the yellow fluorescent protein. (B) Once MMP-9 cleaves the biosensor (sequence recognized by MMP-9 is marked in red), the Venus proteins are released, the FRET phenomenon disappears, and the fluorescence of mTFP1 increases. (C) Time-lapse imaging of endogenous MMP-9 activity visualized with the MMP-9 activity biosensor expressed in a primary rat hippocampal culture. Colors indicate the value of Venus-to-mTFP1 fluorescence intensity ratio (reds—high values of the ratio/uncleaved biosensor; blues—low values of the ratio/cleaved biosensor; see the color bar below image insets). Stimulation was performed with the chemical long-term potentiation (LTP) protocol (see Stawarski et al., 2014). Biosensor pictures in the left and right of the diagram indicate visually the state of the biosensor (uncleaved/cleaved).

MMP-9 in physiological structural plasticity

Research on MMP-9 was originally concentrated on its role in the pathology of the central nervous system (e.g., post-injury and post-stroke damage to brain tissue) due to its ECM-cleavage properties. However, the first indication that MMP-9 may play a role beyond the pathology of the brain came from research on the kainate-induced epilepsy models in mice. Kainate-induced seizures lead to massive cell death in CA regions of the hippocampus, the limbic cortex, and the amygdala but a pronounced plasticity in the dentate gyrus (DG; Zagulska-Szymczak et al., 2001). Nedivi et al. (1993) demonstrated that TIMP-1 mRNA (i.e., an endogenous inhibitor of MMPs, including MMP-9) is upregulated following kainate-induced seizures. A follow-up study (Szklarczyk et al., 2002) revealed that MMP-9 mRNA, protein, and activity levels are also upregulated in the DG of the hippocampus under the same experimental conditions. Furthermore, Jaworski et al. (1999) observed that the expression of TIMP-1 is coupled to neuronal excitation and spatially and temporarily overlaps with c-Fos expression. Kuzniewska et al. (2013) and Ganguly et al. (2013) also demonstrated that MMP-9 expression depends on the c-Fos transcriptional regulation. C-Fos role in brain plasticity was postulated already by Kaczmarek et al. (2002). Nagy et al. (2006) and Bozdagi et al. (2007) demonstrated that MMP-9 is a necessary component of long-term potentiation (LTP; i.e., an experimental paradigm that mimics certain aspects of physiological plasticity) both in acute hippocampal slices and in vivo in urethane-anesthetized rats. They discovered that MMP-9 is required in the late phase of LTP in the CA1 field, and MMP-9 inhibition by whatever means (e.g., inhibitors and antisense RNA) leads to a rapid return of synaptic potentiation to baseline levels. Research on MMP-9 knockout mice revealed diminished LTP that could be rescued by exogenously applied recombinant MMP-9 (Nagy et al., 2006). Meighan et al. (2006) demonstrated that spatial learning leads to alterations in MMP-9 mRNA and protein levels. The injection of either the broad-spectrum MMP inhibitor FN-439 or antisense RNA led to markedly diminished learning in the Morris water maze. A similar effect was achieved with the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK801. Finally, Meighan et al. (2006) demonstrated that the effect of MMPs on learning is facilitated through changes of the actin cytoskeleton. Recent studies also revealed that MMP-9 is required for cortical plasticity evoked by sensory deprivation (e.g., whisker plucking (Kaliszewska et al., 2012) and monocular deprivation (Spolidoro et al., 2012)) and LTP in the mossy fiber-CA3 pathway (Wiera et al., 2012, 2013). Physiological remodeling is also strongly influenced by experience-dependent mechanisms that imply an interaction between neural circuits and the external world. An enriched environment has been shown to influence brain plasticity by inducing MMP-9 activity (Foscarin et al., 2011; Cao et al., 2014). More information on the role of MMP-9 in physiological plasticity can be found in recently published reviews (Rivera et al., 2010; Wlodarczyk et al., 2011).

Matrix metalloproteinases are functionally involved in the regulation of synaptic plasticity (Nagy et al., 2006; Bozdagi et al., 2007; Okulski et al., 2007; Rivera et al., 2010; Huntley, 2012; Szepesi et al., 2013) and formation and maintenance of dendritic spines (Wang et al., 2008; Bilousova et al., 2009; Michaluk et al., 2011). Although details of MMP-9 action on dendritic spines are not fully elucidated, the research performed so far allowed to construct a model of MMP-9 activity around dendritic spines, which is presented in Figure 2. The model postulates that MMP-9 is released from dendritic spines following a stimulus. MMP-9 activity, possibly mediated through β1 integrin signaling causes the elongation of dendritic spines and increases the mobility of NMDA receptors. The time window in which MMP-9 is active is brief, as it is almost immediately inactivated by its endogenous inhibitor TIMP-1. MMP-9 inhibition allows the dendritic spines to mature, incorporate AMPA receptors and form active synapses. The model presented above is supported by numerous observations, which are briefly summarized in the next paragraph.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

MMP-9 involvement in morphological changes of dendritic spines in LTP and possible role in epileptogenesis-related spine pathology. (A) Dendritic spines extend as small protrusions from dendritic shaft. (B1) MMP-9 level is elevated upon stimulus which leads to spine elongation and (C1) maturation. (B2) Fast (within minutes) activation of MMP-9 by injury or seizures may induce spine loss. (C2) Continuous increase of MMP-9 (secondary to seizures, within days) may cause regrowth of dendritic spines and contribute to long-term circuitry remodeling underlying seizures.

The presence of MMP-9-coding mRNA, protein, and enzymatic activity at the level of dendritic spines was confirmed by recent studies (Konopacki et al., 2007; Wilczynski et al., 2008; Gawlak et al., 2009; Dziembowska et al., 2012). The activity-dependent local translation of MMP-9 mRNA and protein release was recently demonstrated by Dziembowska et al. (2012), supporting the hypothesis that locally secreted MMP-9 and other dendritically synthesized proteins are involved in the structural and functional plasticity of activated synapses. MMP-9 also increases the lateral mobility of NMDARs (Michaluk et al., 2009). Michaluk et al. (2011) also demonstrated that elongation and spine thinning are regulated by integrin β1 signaling and are accompanied by changes in the decay time of miniature synaptic currents. The blockade of integrin β1 signaling with an integrin β1 antibody abolished both the MMP-9-dependent increase in NMDAR mobility and its ability to affect spine morphology. The ICAM-5 ectodomain produced by MMP-9 cleavage stimulates an increase in AMPA mini excitatory postsynaptic current (mEPSC) frequency and leads to recruitment of the AMPAR GluA1 subunit to the membrane (Lonskaya et al., 2013).

The activity of MMP-9 that was locally released in response to stimuli was also recently reported to modulate the morphology of dendritic spines (Wang et al., 2008; Bilousova et al., 2009). Admittedly, there is some confusion on how exactly MMP-9 affects the spine morphology, with different groups reporting markedly different effects, with some groups observing spine maturation following MMP-9 activity, while others report dendritic spine elongation. Wang observed that MMP-9 was required in spine enlargement associated with LTP in acute hippocampal slices. That observation indicates that MMP-9 may drive the establishment of persistent modification of both synapse structure and function (Wang et al., 2008). Intracellular adhesion molecule-5 (ICAM-5) cleavage by MMP-9 causes the elongation of dendritic filopodia in dissociated neuronal cultures (Tian et al., 2007) and influences AMPAR-dependent glutamatergic transmission. Our research indicates that the enzymatic activity of MMP-9 is able to cause an elongation and thinning of dendritic spines on hippocampal neurons in three experimental models: transgenic rats that overexpress auto-activating MMP-9, dissociated hippocampal cultures, and organotypic cultures (Michaluk et al., 2011). Bilousova observed that the incubation of dissociated neuronal cultures with recombinant MMP-9 led to the transformation of mushroom-shaped dendritic spines into filopodia-like protrusions (Bilousova et al., 2009). Minocycline, a drug whose pleiotropic effects include the inhibition of MMP-9 activity, reverses filopodia transformation toward mature spines in an animal model of fragile X syndrome (Fmr1 knockout mice). Apparently conflicting effects of MMP-9 on spine structure and dynamics can be explained by different research protocols, including enzyme concentration, treatment duration, and age and developmental stage of the neurons. The research discussed above also differs in the manner by which MMP-9 was applied (i.e., bath application vs. local application), the duration of MMP-9 activity influenced by the inhibitory effect of TIMP-1 (an endogenous MMP-9 inhibitor), and the maturity of neurons. Wang et al. (2008) observed that MMP-9 promotes the maturation of dendritic spines, whereas Tian et al. (2007) and Michaluk et al. (2011) reported something markedly different (i.e., MMP-9 or MMP-9-released products stimulated spine elongation). Wang et al. (2008) performed their studies using acute slices from postnatal day 14 (PD14) to PD21 rats, whereas Michaluk et al. (2011) chose an organotypic culture model from PD7 rats. Furthermore, Wang et al. (2008) applied MMP-9 locally with a stimulating electrode, which more closely resembles physiological conditions, in contrast to the study by Michaluk et al. (2011), who used bath application, which is closer to pathological conditions. MMP-9 activity is thus believed to be strictly regulated, local, and transient, and the inhibition of MMP-9 may be the final step in spine maturation, in which a filopodium-like protrusion matures into a mushroom-like dendritic spine (Tian et al., 2007; Bilousova et al., 2009). Studying the effect of TIMP-1 sequestration on spine morphology might be advantageous.

Spine head protrusions (SHPs) are small filopodia-like processes that extend from the dendritic spine head. They represent a new type of postsynaptic structural remodeling that follows neuronal activity. We recently reported the role of MMP-9 in the formation of SHPs (Szepesi et al., 2013). Chemically induced LTP (cLTP) leads to the upregulation of MMP-9 activity in dissociated hippocampal cultures and appears to control SHP formation. The growth of SHPs is abolished by inhibiting MMP activity or influencing microtubule dynamics. Recombinant auto-activating MMP-9 promotes the formation of SHPs in organotypic hippocampal slices. Spines with SHPs were also shown to recruit new postsynaptic AMPA receptors following cLTP, and AMPAR recruitment was MMP-dependent.

Research indicates that the effect of MMP-9 on spine morphology may be mediated not by a general disruption of ECM structure (Michaluk et al., 2009) but rather by the tightly regulated cleavage of specific ECM proteins that would then trigger the intracellular integrin signaling pathway (Wang et al., 2008; Michaluk et al., 2011). The modifications of spine morphology appear to involve MMP-9 cleavage of the following proteins: β-dystroglycan, ICAM-5, integrins (MMP-9 is known to cleave integrin β2; Vaisar et al. (2009), and β4 (Pal-Ghosh et al., 2011). Indirect evidence also suggests that MMP-9 may drive the cleavage of integrin β1 (Kim et al., 2009), neuroligin-1, and ephrin (Nagy et al., 2006; Michaluk et al., 2007, 2009; Tian et al., 2007; Conant et al., 2010; Peixoto et al., 2012). The MMP-9-driven cleavage of ICAM-5, a negative regulator of spine maturation, was observed following neuronal stimulation and led to spine maturation (Tian et al., 2007; Conant et al., 2010). Peixoto et al. (2012) observed that neuroligin-1 cleavage by MMP-9 at the postsynaptic site of glutamatergic synapses resulted in a destabilized presynaptic site and modification of synaptic transmission. The Ephrin/Eph receptor complex, cleaved by MMP-9 following hippocampal LTP, is involved in learning and memory (Klein, 2004; Murai and Pasquale, 2004). Therefore, MMP-9 is clearly an important player in the dynamic remodeling of dendritic spines, and its affinity for numerous proteins supports the concept of a tetrapartite synapse (Dityatev and Rusakov, 2011).

Matrix metalloproteinases also process various non-ECM proteins, such as growth factor precursors, cell-surface receptors, and adhesion molecules (Nagase and Woessner, 1999; Ethell and Ethell, 2007; Michaluk and Kaczmarek, 2007). Several MMP-9 substrates were identified only in vitro (e.g., the ECM and the basement membrane molecules brevican, laminin and aggrecan; Nakamura et al., 2000; Overall, 2002; Morrison et al., 2009) and not confirmed in vivo. β-dystroglycan (β-DG) was confirmed to be cleaved by MMP-9 in vivo in response to enhanced neuronal activity (Michaluk et al., 2007). β-DG is a transmembrane protein that serves as a cell-surface anchor for α-dystroglycan, which binds to the extracellular domains of β-DG and laminin, agrin, and perlecan (Ervasti and Campbell, 1993; Gee et al., 1993; Bowe et al., 1994; Campanelli et al., 1996; Peng et al., 1998; Henry et al., 2001) in non-neuronal cells and neurexins in the central nervous system (Sugita et al., 2001). Thus, MMP-9 activity may uncouple the cytoskeleton from the ECM. Other cell-surface receptors that were confirmed to be MMP-9 substrates include the interleukin-2 (IL-2) receptor α chain (CD25; Sheu et al., 2001; De Paiva et al., 2009), ephrin B (Lin et al., 2008), and NG2 proteoglycan in the spinal cord (Larsen et al., 2003).

Bajor et al. (2012) isolated two synaptic proteins that are cleaved in vivo by MMP-9: synaptic cell adhesion molecule-2 (synCAM-2) and collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2). CRMP-2 is involved in axon guidance, neurite outgrowth, and the regulation of neuronal differentiation (Inagaki et al., 2001; Fukata et al., 2002; Yoshimura et al., 2005). It was suggested to play a role in numerous neurological diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, epilepsy, and ischemia (Gu and Ihara, 2000; Czech et al., 2004; Uchida and Goshima, 2005). SynCAM-2 (also known as Necl-3, IgSF4D, and Cadm-2) is a Ca2+-binding immunoglobulin-like transmembrane protein that is expressed by neurons in the developing and adult brain. It is localized to the synaptic cleft and contributes to synaptic organization and function (Fogel et al., 2007).

Growth factors and signaling molecules that were confirmed to be processed by MMP-9 in vivo include IL-8 (Van den Steen et al., 2000), pro brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; Hwang et al., 2005; Mizoguchi et al., 2011a), pro tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α; Roghani et al., 1999), and pro transforming growth factor β (TGF-β; Yu and Stamenkovic, 2000). The ability of MMP-9 to cleave β-amyloid peptide is particularly interesting because an increase in MMP-9 expression was observed in Alzheimer’s disease patients by several research groups (Backstrom et al., 1996; Yan et al., 2006; Mizoguchi et al., 2011a; Filippov and Dityatev, 2012).

MMP-9 in aberrant structural plasticity

Accumulating evidence suggests that MMP-9 may also play a relatively direct role in other forms of learning and memory, including those associated with addiction. Many drugs and alcohol induce neuroplastic changes in pathways that subserve emotion and cognition. Elevated MMP-9 activity has been implicated in the synaptic remodeling that is important for the reactivation of cocaine memory in rats (Brown et al., 2008a). In mice, methamphetamine treatment resulted in the rapid upregulation of MMP-9 (Liu et al., 2008; Conant et al., 2011). MMP-9 has also been implicated in the plastic changes induced by alcohol addiction (Samochowiec et al., 2010). Importantly, both drug and chronic alcohol exposure cause structural alterations of dendrites and their spines (Zhou et al., 2007; Shen et al., 2009).

The importance of MMP-9 in shaping dendritic spine architecture in disease is further supported by autism and mental retardation studies. Fragile X syndrome is a form of inherited intellectual disability (Hagerman et al., 2005; Bagni et al., 2012). Patients with fragile X syndrome have aberrant dendritic spine morphology (Rudelli et al., 1985). Long and thin immature dendritic spines are also observed in Fmr1 knockout mice, a model of fragile X syndrome (Comery et al., 1997). MMP-9 has been shown to be highly increased in the fragile X syndrome mouse model (Bilousova et al., 2009). The reduction of MMP-9 levels induced by minocycline promoted dendritic spine maturation and improved general behavioral performance. High MMP-9 activity levels are also lowered by minocycline in fragile X syndrome patients (Dziembowska et al., 2013). Notably, minocycline has been tested in clinical trials to treat fragile X syndrome and shown to provide significant functional benefits (Paribello et al., 2010; Utari et al., 2010; Leigh et al., 2013). Matrix metalloproteinases have also been implicated in other forms of autism (Abdallah and Miche1, 2013). MMP-9 levels are elevated in patients with Autism Spectrum Disorder (Abdallah et al., 2012). MMP-9 levels are also increased in patients with schizophrenia (Rybakowski et al., 2013), and dendritic spine alterations have been identified in multiple brain regions in schizophrenia (Glausier and Lewis, 2013).

Aberrant structural plasticity is a major phenomenon associated with epilepsy (Scharfman, 2002). Epilepsy is a brain disorder characterized by an enduring predisposition to the generation of epileptic seizures, understood as sudden excessive neuronal discharges. In many cases, epilepsy develops as a result of brain damage caused by traumatic brain injury, stroke, or infection (Banerjee and Hauser, 2008). The primary insult is associated with an increased incidence of secondary injuries that can develop within hours to days or even weeks. Secondary brain injury is thought to be responsible for the development of many of the aforementioned sustained neurological deficits (Bolkvadze and Pitkanen, 2012; Rezaei et al., 2012; Mollayeva et al., 2013). Patients with epilepsy frequently suffer from memory impairment, behavioral problems, and psychiatric disorders (Dodrill, 2002; Helmstaedter, 2002; Williams, 2003; Elger et al., 2004; Berg, 2011). Dendritic spines receive a majority of excitatory synaptic inputs. Transmission and dendritic spine shape and function are strictly related, and such structural changes likely constitute hallmarks of pathology and the observed cognitive deficits.

Indeed, abnormalities in dendritic spines have been commonly associated with human epilepsy and animal models of epilepsy (Swann et al., 2000; Wong, 2005). A prominent decrease in dendritic spine density has been observed in pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus and neocortex and dentate granule cells in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (Multani et al., 1994; Jiang et al., 1998; Blümcke et al., 1999; Freiman et al., 2011; Kitaura et al., 2011). Similar aberrations have been observed in animal models of epilepsy (Jiang et al., 1998; González-Burgos et al., 2004; Ampuero et al., 2007). Notably, other alterations, such as an increase in dendritic spine number or size, have also been reported (Represa et al., 1993; Suzuki et al., 1997; Isokawa, 2000). These common features of both human and animal studies indicate that dendritic spine abnormalities represent an important factor in the pathological mechanisms of posttraumatic epilepsy, but it is still unclear whether they are more related to the cause or consequence of seizures (Wong and Guo, 2013). Furthermore, dendritic spine pathology may be both the cause and consequence of seizures. Alterations in dendritic spine structure or function can affect the processing of synaptic inputs. Seizures are implicated in excessive neuronal excitability, and these changes may constitute a compensatory response in the form of a homeostatic mechanism. However, the loss of excitatory input eventually affects inhibitory networks, which in turn may cause increased excitability and an inclination toward seizures.

An important issue are the mechanisms that are involved in dendritic spine pathology in epilepsy. The ECM constitutes a natural milieu for dendritic spines, and ECM remodeling may potentially influence epileptogenesis on many different levels, predominantly related to structural reorganization. Extracellular structural networks stabilize cellular and synaptic components. When pathology occurs, however, these stable components break down, which may lead to abnormal structural reorganization (i.e., dendritic spine loss or axonal sprouting) that promotes circuitry reorganization and epileptogenesis. Seizures lead to striking remodeling of the ECM, which may be essentially engaged in different aspects of epileptogenesis (Dityatev, 2010; Lukasiuk et al., 2011). Metalloproteinases, enzymes that modulate the ECM, grow to be important players in these processes. Evidence for a role of MMP-9 in physiological and aberrant synaptic plasticity and posttraumatic epileptogenesis is especially strong, in contrast to other MMPs (Lukasiuk et al., 2011).

Some evidence also comes from human studies. The critical role of MMP-9 in pathology following trauma is supported by clinical studies, in which elevated levels of MMP-9 were detected in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with severe traumatic brain injury (Grossetete et al., 2009). Prolonged seizures are also related to high serum MMP-9 levels in patients (Suenaga et al., 2008). MMP-9 is also upregulated in the cortex in patients with focal cortical dysplasia, a disorder associated with intractable cortical epilepsy (Konopka et al., 2013). Notably, the prominent upregulation of MMP-9 was observed mainly at postsynaptic sites (i.e., at dendritic spines).

The involvement of the MMP-9 proteolytic system has been widely studied in animal models of epilepsy. After traumatic brain injury, the activation of MMP-9 in lesioned cortex occurred within 1 day following trauma and remained elevated for 7 days after the initial insult (Hadass et al., 2013). Moreover, treatment with an MMP-9 inhibitor effectively attenuated MMP-9 activity, reduced brain lesion volume, and prevented neuronal loss and dendritic degeneration (Hadass et al., 2013). Similarly, after brain trauma, MMP-9 protein levels are increased compared with the contralateral cortex, with a peak 24 h following injury and elevations that persist for up to 1 week. Moreover, MMP-9 knockout mice have smaller traumatic brain lesion volumes (Wang et al., 2000).

MMP-9 is also induced during status epilepticus after treatment with kainate (Zhang et al., 2000; Szklarczyk et al., 2002; Jourquin et al., 2003; Konopacki et al., 2007) and pilocarpine (Kim et al., 2009). MMP-9 immunoreactivity (IR) is increased 24 h after kainic acid (KA) administration. IR is initially observed in neurons, and expression remains elevated for up to 7 days. Notably, MMP-9 IR is also observed in astrocytes (Figure 3). The increased expression and activity of MMP-9 has been shown to also occur with pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizures (Michaluk et al., 2007; Rylski et al., 2009; Mizoguchi et al., 2011b). In these models, MMP-9 has been suggested to contribute to neuronal death (Jourquin et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2009), dendritic spine pruning (Szklarczyk et al., 2002), and the formation of aberrant synaptic contacts (Szklarczyk et al., 2002).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

MMP-9 immunoreactivity (IR) in the Dentate Gyrus (DG) of control animal and 1–7 days following intra-amygdalar kainic acid (KA) administration. (A) Immediately after KA administration MMP-9 IR is low and distributed equally across DG layers. (B–D) MMP-9 IR increases after KA injection. (C–D) Note increased IR of MMP-9 predominantly in molecular layer (ML). (D) Seven days post KA administration neuronal MMP-9 reservoir is enriched with astrocytic pool. Confocal images from brain tissue labeled with nuclear marker (DAPI—white), MMP-9 antibody (red), astrocyte marker anitbody (S-100, blue), microglia marker antibody (IB4-GS, green). GL—granular layer, ML—molecular layer. Scale bar 50 μm. The experiment was performed by dr Grzegorz Wilczynski. For further reference, see Wilczynski et al. (2008).

Strong evidence for a pivotal role of MMP-9 in epileptogenesis-related plasticity was provided by Mizoguchi and Wilczynski (Wilczynski et al., 2008; Mizoguchi et al., 2011a). Repeated treatment with PTZ produced kindled seizure, accompanied by enhanced MMP-9 activity and expression in the hippocampus (Mizoguchi et al., 2011a). The sensitivity to PTZ kindling was decreased in MMP-9 knockout mice (Wilczynski et al., 2008; Mizoguchi et al., 2011a). These mice also exhibited less severe seizures. In contrast, rats with constitutive neuronal MMP-9 overexpression that received PTZ treatment were more susceptible to seizures than wildtype animals. MMP-9 has been suggested to facilitate the development of seizures by affecting epilepsy-related synaptic plasticity. Seizure-induced MMP-9 expression was previously shown to be localized to dendrites and synapses and implicated in synaptic remodeling and mossy fiber sprouting, pathological structural phenomena associated with epilepsy (Szklarczyk et al., 2002; Michaluk and Kaczmarek, 2007; Gawlak et al., 2009). Indeed, MMP-9 protein levels and activity localized at synapses were strongly upregulated following intraperitoneal kainate treatment (Wilczynski et al., 2008). In the same study, unilateral kainate injections into the amygdala were used to induce status epilepticus. Twenty-four hours after seizure onset, spine density decreased in the DG on the injected side compared with the contralateral side in MMP-9 wildtype animals. In contrast, no difference in spine density was found between the injected and contralateral sides in MMP-9 knockout mice. Overall, status epilepticus-induced dendritic spine loss in the ML of the DG appears to be mediated by MMP-9 release from spines in response to seizures. In MMP-9 knockout animals the pruning of dendritic spines is abolished, despite the presence of stimulus. MMP-9 was also shown to be involved in mossy fiber sprouting and aberrant synaptogenesis in hippocampal epileptogenesis, in which neither of these phenomena develop in the absence of the enzyme. Interestingly, mossy fiber sprouting sites have been associated with the regrowth of dendritic spines in this region after status epilepticus (Isokawa, 2000).

MMP-9 activity was also considerably enhanced in other epilepsy models that do not involve neuronal cell loss (Baracskay et al., 2008; Gallyas et al., 2008; Sarkisova and van Luijtelaar, 2011). MMP-9 may be involved in generalized absence epilepsy, in which increased activity was found in WAG/Rij rats (Takacs et al., 2010). These rats spontaneously produce absence-like seizures caused by the hypersynchronic activity of thalamocortical and corticothalamic neurons and are commonly used as an animal model of human absence epilepsy (Coenen and Van Luijtelaar, 2003). Interestingly, the administration of doxycycline, an MMP inhibitor, aggravated epileptiform activity in WAG/Rij rats (Kovács et al., 2011). Matrix metalloproteinases were previously shown to act directly on NMDA and AMPA receptors (Michaluk et al., 2009; Gorkiewicz et al., 2010). This may, in turn, provide a sort of balanced homeostatic synaptic plasticity during seizures. NMDA and AMPA receptors are involved in the genesis of absence seizures (Coenen and Van Luijtelaar, 2003). Therefore, MMP-9 inhibition may increase the net level of excitability and increase absence-like epileptic activity in WAG/Rij rats (Takacs et al., 2010).

Considering the extant evidence, MMP-9 might play a dual role in epilepsy, with distinct roles in pathogenesis at various time-points after seizures (Michaluk and Kaczmarek, 2007). Aside from contributing to structural remodeling, MMP-9 may also be involved in maintaining homeostatic synaptic plasticity to counteract epileptic seizures. Fast activation of MMP-9 by seizures (i.e., within minutes) may induce spine loss (which is not observed in MMP-9 knockout mice) that initially alters neuronal excitability and reduces the effects of seizures. Sustained increases in MMP-9 levels (secondary to seizures, within days) may be hypothesized to push the balance toward the regrowth of dendritic spines and restore system balance but in effect contribute to long-term circuitry remodeling. Such aberrant plasticity may underlie epileptogenesis and lead to the formation of epileptic foci in the brain (Figure 2).

Conclusions

Brain plasticity relies on modifications in synaptic connectivity that are driven by molecular changes in neurons and the ECM. The ability to change synaptic connections comprises alterations of dendritic spines at the morphological level. We reviewed the role of ECM metalloproteinase activity in physiological and pathological structural plasticity. We summarized the contribution of MMP-9 in the dynamic remodeling of the ECM via the cleavage of numerous extracellular substrates and its role in the formation, modification, and maintenance of dendritic spines. Importantly, MMP-9 may serve as an example of a proteolytic modifier of the ECM, thus supporting the concept of a tetrapartite synapse. Finally, we examined the morphological abnormalities of dendritic protrusions that are well known to be associated with neuropsychiatric disorders, particularly those that involve cognitive deficits. We reviewed evidence that implicates MMP-9 in aberrant synaptic plasticity and spine dysmorphology in neuropsychiatric disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education (grant no. IP2011 060671), the European Regional Development Fund (POIG 01.01.02-00-008/08), and an ERA-NET-NEURON/09/2013 grant to Marzena Stefaniuk.

We would like to thank prof. Leszek Kaczmarek for the critical review of the manuscript. We would like to thank prof. Wilczynski for kindly providing Figure 3.

Marzena Stefaniuk, Michal Stawarski and Jakub Wlodarczyk drafted and critically revised the manuscript. Jakub Wlodarczyk contributed to the general conception of the work and approved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Abdallah M. W., Miche1 T. M. (2013). Matrix metalloproteinases in autism spectrum disorders. J. Mol. Psychiatry 1:16 10.1186/2049-9256-1-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abdallah M. W., Pearce B. D., Larsen N., Greaves-Lord K., Nørgaard-Pedersen B., Hougaard D. M., et al. (2012). Amniotic fluid MMP-9 and neurotrophins in autism spectrum disorders: an exploratory study. Autism Res. 5, 428–433 10.1002/aur.1254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Akers W. J., Xu B., Lee H., Sudlow G. P., Fields G. B., Achilefu S., et al. (2012). Detection of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity in vivo with a triple-helical peptide optical probe. Bioconjug. Chem. 23, 656–663 10.1021/bc300027y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Akool E. S., Kleinert H., Hamada F. M., Abdelwahab M. H., Forstermann U., Pfeilschifter J., et al. (2003). Nitric oxide increases the decay of matrix metalloproteinase 9 mRNA by inhibiting the expression of mRNA-stabilizing factor HuR. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 4901–4916 10.1128/mcb.23.14.4901-4916.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ampuero E., Dagnino-Subiabre A., Sandoval R., Zepeda-Carreno R., Sandoval S., Viedma A., et al. (2007). Status epilepticus induces region-specific changes in dendritic spines, dendritic length and TrkB protein content of rat brain cortex. Brain Res. 1150, 225–238 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Araque A., Parpura V., Sanzgiri R. P., Haydon P. G. (1999). Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner. Trends Neurosci. 22, 208–215 10.1016/s0166-2236(98)01349-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Araya R., Jiang J., Eisenthal K. B., Yuste R. (2006). The spine neck filters membrane potentials. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 103, 17961–17966 10.1073/pnas.0608755103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Backstrom J. R., Lim G. P., Cullen M. J., Tokes Z. A. (1996). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) is synthesized in neurons of the human hippocampus and is capable of degrading the amyloid-β peptide (1–40). J. Neurosci. 16, 7910–7919 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bagni C., Tassone F., Neri G., Hagerman R. (2012). Fragile X syndrome: causes, diagnosis, mechanisms and therapeutics. J. Clin. Invest. 122, 4314–4322 10.1172/JCI63141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bajor M., Michaluk P., Gulyassy P., Kekesi A. K., Juhasz G., Kaczmarek L. (2012). Synaptic cell adhesion molecule-2 and collapsing response mediator protein-2 are novel members of the matrix metalloproteinase-9 degradome. J. Neurochem. 122, 775–788 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07829.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Banerjee P. N., Hauser W. A. (2008). “Incidence and prevalence,” in Epilepsy. A Comprehensive Textbook, eds Engel J., Pedley T. A. (Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; ), 45–56 [Google Scholar]
  12. Baracskay P., Szepesi Z., Orban G., Juhasz G., Czurko A. (2008). Generalization of seizures parallels the formation of “dark” neurons in the hippocampus and pontine reticular formation after focal-cortical application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) in the rat. Brain Res. 1228, 217–228 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Becker J. W., Marcy A. I., Rokosz L. L., Axel M. G., Burbaum J. J., Fitzgerald P. M., et al. (1995). Stromelysin-1: three-dimensional structure of the inhibited catalytic domain and of the C-truncated proenzyme. Protein Sci. 4, 1966–1976 10.1002/pro.5560041002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Berg A. T. (2011). Epilepsy, cognition and behavior: the clinical picture. Epilepsia 52(Suppl. 1), 7–12 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02905.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Bilousova T. V., Dansie L., Ngo M., Aye J., Charles J. R., Ethell D. W., et al. (2009). Minocycline promotes dendritic spine maturation and improves behavioural performance in the fragile X mouse model. J. Med. Genet. 46, 94–102 10.1136/jmg.2008.061796 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Blümcke I., Zuschratter W., Schewe J. C., Suter B., Lie A. A., Riederer B. M., et al. (1999). Cellular pathology of hilar neurons in Ammon’s horn sclerosis. J. Comp. Neurol. 414, 437–453 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Bode W., Fernandez-Catalan C., Nagase H., Maskos K. (1999). Endoproteinase-protein inhibitor interactions. APMIS 107, 3–10 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1999.tb01520.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Bolkvadze T., Pitkanen A. (2012). Development of post-traumatic epilepsy after controlled cortical impact and lateral fluid-percussion-induced brain injury in the mouse. J. Neurotrauma 29, 789–812 10.1089/neu.2011.1954 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bourguignon L. Y., Zhu D., Zhu H. (1998). CD44 isoform-cytoskeleton interaction in oncogenic signaling and tumor progression. Front. Biosci. 3, d637–d649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Bowe M. A., Deyst K. A., Leszyk J. D., Fallon J. R. (1994). Identification and purification of an agrin receptor from Torpedo postsynaptic membranes: a heteromeric complex related to the dystroglycans. Neuron 12, 1173–1180 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90324-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Bozdagi O., Nagy V., Kwei K. T., Huntley G. W. (2007). In vivo roles for matrix metalloproteinase-9 in mature hippocampal synaptic physiology and plasticity. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 334–344 10.1152/jn.00202.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Brown T. E., Forquer M. R., Harding J. W., Wright J. W., Sorg B. A. (2008a). Increase in matrix metalloproteinase-9 levels in the rat medial prefrontal cortex after cocaine reinstatement of conditioned place preference. Synapse 62, 886–889 10.1002/syn.20562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Brown C. E., Wong C., Murphy T. H. (2008b). Rapid morphologic plasticity of peri-infarct dendritic spines after focal ischemic stroke. Stroke 39, 1286–1291 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498238 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Bruno M. A., Cuello A. C. (2006). Activity-dependent release of precursor nerve growth factor, conversion to mature nerve growth factor and its degradation by a protease cascade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 103, 6735–6740 10.1073/pnas.0510645103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Campanelli J. T., Gayer G. G., Scheller R. H. (1996). Alternative RNA splicing that determines agrin activity regulates binding to heparin and α-dystroglycan. Development 122, 1663–1672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Campbell J. N., Low B., Kurz J. E., Patel S. S., Young M. T., Churn S. B. (2012). Mechanisms of dendritic spine remodeling in rat model of traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 29, 218–234 10.1089/neu.2011.1762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cao W., Duan J., Wang X., Zhong X., Hu Z., Huang F., et al. (2014). Early enriched environment induces an increased conversion of proBDNF to BDNF in the adults rat’s hippocampus. Behav. Brain Res. 265, 76–83 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.02.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cha H., Kopetzki E., Huber R., Lanzendorfer M., Brandstetter H. (2002). Structural basis of the adaptive molecular recognition by MMP9. J. Mol. Biol. 320, 1065–1079 10.1016/s0022-2836(02)00558-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Chung K., Wallace J., Kim S.-Y., Kalyanasundaram S., Andalman A. S., Davidson T. J., et al. (2013). Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337 10.1038/nature12107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Coenen A. M., Van Luijtelaar E. L. (2003). Genetic animal models for absence epilepsy: a review of the WAG/Rij strain of rats. Behav. Genet. 33, 635–655 10.1023/A:1026179013847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Comery T. A., Harris J. B., Willems P. J., Oostra B. A., Irwin S. A., Weiler I. J., et al. (1997). Abnormal dendritic spines in fragile X knockout mice: maturation and pruning deficits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 94, 5401–5404 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Conant K., Lonskaya I., Szklarczyk A., Krall C., Steiner J., Maguire-Zeiss K., et al. (2011). Methamphetamine-associated cleavage of the synaptic adhesion molecule intercellular adhesion molecule-5. J. Neurochem. 118, 521–532 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07153.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Conant K., Wang Y., Szklarczyk A., Dudak A., Mattson M. P., Lim S. T. (2010). Matrix metalloproteinase-dependent shedding of intercellular adhesion molecule-5 occurs with long-term potentiation. Neuroscience 166, 508–521 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.12.061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Czech T., Yang J. W., Csaszar E., Kappler J., Baumgartner C., Lubec G. (2004). Reduction of hippocampal collapsin response mediated protein-2 in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurochem. Res. 29, 2189–2196 10.1007/s11064-004-7025-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Dansie L. E., Ethell I. M. (2011). Casting a net on dendritic spines: the extracellular matrix and its receptors. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 956–981 10.1002/dneu.20963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. De Leo J. A., Tawfik V. L., Lacroix-Fralish M. L. (2006). The tetrapartite synapse: path to CNS sensitization and chronic pain. Pain 122, 17–21 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. De Paiva C. S., Yoon K. C., Pangelinan S. B., Pham S., Puthenparambil L. M., Chuang E. Y., et al. (2009). Cleavage of functional IL-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25) from murine corneal and conjunctival epithelia by MMP-9. J. Inflamm. (Lond) 6:31 10.1186/1476-9255-6-31 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. de Vivo L., Landi S., Panniello M., Baroncelli L., Chierzi S., Mariotti L., et al. (2013). Extracellular matrix inhibits structural and functional plasticity of dendritic spines in the adult visual cortex. Nat. Commun. 4:1484 10.1038/ncomms2491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Dityatev A. (2010). Remodeling of extracellular matrix and epileptogenesis. Epilepsia 51(Suppl. 3), 61–65 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02612.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dityatev A., Rusakov D. A. (2011). Molecular signals of plasticity at the tetrapartite synapse. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 21, 353–359 10.1016/j.conb.2010.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Dityatev A., Schachner M., Sonderegger P. (2010). The dual role of the extracellular matrix in synaptic plasticity and homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 735–746 10.1038/nrn2898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Dodrill C. B. (2002). Progressive cognitive decline in adolescents and adults with epilepsy. Prog. Brain Res. 135, 399–407 10.1016/s0079-6123(02)35037-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dziembowska M., Milek J., Janusz A., Rejmak E., Romanowska E., Gorkiewicz T., et al. (2012). Activity-dependent local translation of matrix metalloproteinase-9. J. Neurosci. 32, 14538–14547 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6028-11.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Dziembowska M., Pretto D. I., Janusz A., Kaczmarek L., Leigh M. J., Gabriel N., et al. (2013). High MMP-9 activity levels in fragile X syndrome are lowered by minocycline. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 161A, 1897–1903 10.1002/ajmg.a.36023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Elger C. E., Helmstaedter C., Kurthen M. (2004). Chronic epilepsy and cognition. Lancet Neurol. 3, 663–672 10.1016/S1474-4422(04)00906-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ervasti J. M., Campbell K. P. (1993). A role for the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex as a transmembrane linker between laminin and actin. J. Cell Biol. 122, 809–823 10.1083/jcb.122.4.809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ethell I. M., Ethell D. W. (2007). Matrix metalloproteinases in brain development and remodeling: synaptic functions and targets. J. Neurosci. Res. 85, 2813–2823 10.1002/jnr.21273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Faust A., Waschkau B., Waldeck J., Höltke C., Breyholz H.-J., Wagner S., et al. (2008). Synthesis and evaluation of a novel fluorescent photoprobe for imaging matrix metalloproteinases. Bioconjug. Chem. 19, 1001–1008 10.1021/bc700409j [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Filippov M. A., Dityatev A. (2012). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 and non-amyloidogenic pathway of amyloid precursor protein processing. J. Neurochem. 121, 181–183 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07641.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Fogel A. I., Akins M. R., Krupp A. J., Stagi M., Stein V., Biederer T. (2007). SynCAMs organize synapses through heterophilic adhesion. J. Neurosci. 27, 12516–12530 10.1523/jneurosci.2739-07.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Foscarin S., Ponchione D., Pajaj E., Leto K., Gawlak M., Wilczynski G. M., et al. (2011). Experience-dependent plasticity and modulation of growth regulatory molecules at central synapses. PLoS One 6:e16666 10.1371/journal.pone.0016666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Freiman T. M., Eismann-Schweimler J., Frotscher M. (2011). Granule cell dispersion in temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with changes in dendritic orientation and spine distribution. Exp. Neurol. 229, 332–338 10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.02.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Fudala R., Ranjan A. P., Mukerjee A., Vishwanatha J. K., Gryczynski Z., Borejdo J., et al. (2011). Fluorescence detection of MMP-9: I. MMP-9 selectively cleaves Lys-Gly-Pro-Arg-Ser-Leu-Ser-Gly-Lys peptide. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 12, 834–838 10.2174/138920111795470967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fukata Y., Itoh T. J., Kimura T., Menager C., Nishimura T., Shiromizu T., et al. (2002). CRMP-2 binds to tubulin heterodimers to promote microtubule assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 583–591 10.1038/ncb825 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gallyas F., Kiglics V., Baracskay P., Juhasz G., Czurko A. (2008). The mode of death of epilepsy-induced “dark” neurons is neither necrosis nor apoptosis: an electron-microscopic study. Brain Res. 1239, 207–215 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Ganguly K., Rejmak E., Mikosz M., Nikolaev E., Knapska E., Kaczmarek L. (2013). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMP) 9 transcription in mouse brain induced by fear learning. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 20978–20991 10.1074/jbc.m113.457903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  57. Gawlak M., Górkiewicz T., Gorlewicz A., Konopacki F. A., Kaczmarek L., Wilczynski G. M. (2009). High resolution in situ zymography reveals matrix metalloproteinase activity at glutamatergic synapses. Neuroscience 158, 167–176 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.05.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gee S. H., Blacher R. W., Douville P. J., Provost P. R., Yurchenco P. D., Carbonetto S. (1993). Laminin-binding protein 120 from brain is closely related to the dystrophin-associated glycoprotein, dystroglycan and binds with high affinity to the major heparin binding domain of laminin. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 14972–14980 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Glausier J. R., Lewis D. A. (2013). Dendritic spine pathology in schizophrenia. Neuroscience 251, 90–107 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. González-Burgos I., López-Vázquez M. A., Beas-Zárate C. (2004). Density, but not shape, of hippocampal dendritic spines varies after a seizure-inducing acute dose of monosodium glutamate in rats. Neurosci. Lett. 363, 22–24 10.1016/j.neulet.2004.03.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Gorkiewicz T., Szczuraszek K., Wyrembek P., Michaluk P., Kaczmarek L., Mozrzymas J. W. (2010). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 reversibly affects the time course of NMDA-induced currents in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Hippocampus 20, 1105–1108 10.1002/hipo.20736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Grossetete M., Phelps J., Arko L., Yonas H., Rosenberg G. A. (2009). Elevation of matrix metalloproteinases 3 and 9 in cerebrospinal fluid and blood in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Neurosurgery 65, 702–708 10.1227/01.neu.0000351768.11363.48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Gu Y., Ihara Y. (2000). Evidence that collapsin response mediator protein-2 is involved in the dynamics of microtubules. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 17917–17920 10.1074/jbc.c000179200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Gustafson J. A., Price R. A., Frandsen J., Henak C. R., Cappello J., Ghandehari H. (2013). Synthesis and characterization of a matrix-metalloproteinase responsive silk-elastinlike protein polymer. Biomacromolecules 14, 618–625 10.1021/bm3013692 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hadass O., Tomlinson B. N., Gooyit M., Chen S., Purdy J. J., Walker J. M., et al. (2013). Selective inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-9 attenuates secondary damage resulting from severe traumatic brain injury. PLoS One 8:e76904 10.1371/journal.pone.0076904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Hagerman R. J., Ono M. Y., Hagerman P. J. (2005). Recent advances in fragile X: a model for autism and neurodegeneration. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry 18, 490–496 10.1097/01.yco.0000179485.39520.b0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hahn-Dantona E., Ruiz J. F., Bornstein P., Strickland D. K. (2001). The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein modulates levels of matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) by mediating its cellular catabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15498–15503 10.1074/jbc.m100121200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hama H., Kurokawa H., Kawano H., Ando R., Shimogori T., Noda H., et al. (2011). Scale: a chemical approach for fluorescence imaging and reconstruction of transparent mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 1481–1488 10.1038/nn.2928 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Harris K. M., Stevens J. K. (1989). Dendritic spines of CA1 pyramidal cells in the rat hippocampus: serial electron microscopy with reference to their biophysical characteristics. J. Neurosci. 9, 2982–2997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hasebe Y., Egawa K., Shibanuma M., Nose K. (2007). Induction of matrix metalloproteinase gene expression in an endothelial cell line by direct interaction with malignant cells. Cancer Sci. 98, 58–67 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2006.00344.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Helmstaedter C. (2002). Effects of chronic epilepsy on declarative memory systems. Prog. Brain Res. 135, 439–453 10.1016/s0079-6123(02)35041-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Henry M. D., Satz J. S., Brakebusch C., Costell M., Gustafsson E., Fassler R., et al. (2001). Distinct roles for dystroglycan, β1 integrin and perlecan in cell surface laminin organization. J. Cell Sci. 114, 1137–1144 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Hill J. W., Poddar R., Thompson J. F., Rosenberg G. A., Yang Y. (2012). Intranuclear matrix metalloproteinases promote DNA damage and apoptosis induced by oxygen-glucose deprivation in neurons. Neuroscience 220, 277–290 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Hsieh H. L., Chi P. L., Lin C. C., Yang C. C., Yang C. M. (2014). Up-regulation of ROS-dependent matrix metalloproteinase-9 from high-glucose-challenged astrocytes contributes to the neuronal apoptosis. Mol. Neurobiol. [Epub ahead of print]. in press. 10.1007/s12035-013-8628-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Huntley G. W. (2012). Synaptic circuit remodelling by matrix metalloproteinases in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 743–757 10.1038/nrn3320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Hwang J. J., Park M. H., Choi S. Y., Koh J. Y. (2005). Activation of the Trk signaling pathway by extracellular zinc: role of metalloproteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 11995–12001 10.1074/jbc.m403172200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Inagaki N., Chihara K., Arimura N., Menager C., Kawano Y., Matsuo N., et al. (2001). CRMP-2 induces axons in cultured hippocampal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 781–782 10.1038/90476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Isokawa M. (2000). Remodeling dendritic spines of dentate granule cells in temporal lobe epilepsy patients and the rat pilocarpine model. Epilepsia 41Suppl. 6, S14–S17 10.1111/j.1528-1157.2000.tb01550.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Jaworski J., Biedermann I. W., Lapinska J., Szklarczyk A., Figiel I., Konopka D., et al. (1999). Neuronal excitation-driven and AP-1-dependent activation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 gene expression in rodent hippocampus. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28106–28112 10.1074/jbc.274.40.28106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Jiang M., Lee C. L., Smith K. L., Swann J. W. (1998). Spine loss and other persistent alterations of hippocampal pyramidal cell dendrites in a model of early-onset epilepsy. J. Neurosci. 18, 8356–8368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Jourquin J., Tremblay E., Decanis N., Charton G., Hanessian S., Chollet A. M., et al. (2003). Neuronal activity-dependent increase of net matrix metalloproteinase activity is associated with MMP-9 neurotoxicity after kainate. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 1507–1517 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02876.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Kaczmarek L. (2013). MMP-9 inhibitors in the brain: can old bullets shoot new targets? Curr. Pharm. Des. 19, 1085–1089 10.2174/1381612811319060010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Kaczmarek L., Lapinska-Dzwonek J., Szymczak S. (2002). Matrix metalloproteinases in the adult brain physiology: a link between c-Fos, AP-1 and remodeling of neuronal connections? EMBO J. 21, 6643–6648 10.1093/emboj/cdf676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Kaijzel E. L., Van Heijningen P. M., Wielopolski P. A., Vermeij M., Koning G. A., Van Cappellen W. A., et al. (2010). Multimodality imaging reveals a gradual increase in matrix metalloproteinase activity at aneurysmal lesions in live fibulin-4 mice. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging 3, 567–577 10.1161/circimaging.109.933093 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Kaliszewska A., Bijata M., Kaczmarek L., Kossut M. (2012). Experience-dependent plasticity of the barrel cortex in mice observed with 2-DG brain mapping and c-Fos: effects of MMP-9 KO. Cereb. Cortex 22, 2160–2170 10.1093/cercor/bhr303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Kharazia V. N., Weinberg R. J. (1999). Immunogold localization of AMPA and NMDA receptors in somatic sensory cortex of albino rat. J. Comp. Neurol. 412, 292–302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Kim B. G., Dai H. N., McAtee M., Vicini S., Bregman B. S. (2006). Remodeling of synaptic structure in the motor cortex following spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol. 198, 401–415 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kim G. W., Kim H. J., Cho K. J., Kim H. W., Cho Y. J., Lee B. I. (2009). The role of MMP-9 in integrin-mediated hippocampal cell death after pilocarpine-induced status epilepticus. Neurobiol. Dis. 36, 169–180 10.1016/j.nbd.2009.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kim Y. H., Kwon H. J., Kim D. S. (2012). Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9)-dependent processing of βig-h3 protein regulates cell migration, invasion and adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 38957–38969 10.1074/jbc.M112.357863 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Kitaura H., Hiraishi T., Murakami H., Masuda H., Fukuda M., Oishi M., et al. (2011). Spatiotemporal dynamics of epileptiform propagations: imaging of human brain slices. Neuroimage 58, 50–59 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kjeldsen L., Johnsen A. H., Sengelov H., Borregaard N. (1993). Isolation and primary structure of NGAL, a novel protein associated with human neutrophil gelatinase. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 10425–10432 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Klein R. (2004). Eph/ephrin signaling in morphogenesis, neural development and plasticity. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 16, 580–589 10.1016/j.ceb.2004.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Konopacki F. A., Rylski M., Wilczek E., Amborska R., Detka D., Kaczmarek L., et al. (2007). Synaptic localization of seizure-induced matrix metalloproteinase-9 mRNA. Neuroscience 150, 31–39 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Konopka A., Grajkowska W., Ziemianska K., Roszkowski M., Daszkiewicz P., Rysz A., et al. (2013). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in human intractable epilepsy caused by focal cortical dysplasia. Epilepsy Res. 104, 45–58 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Kovács Z., Kekesi K. A., Baracskay P., Juhasz G., Czurko A. (2011). Doxycycline could aggravate the absence-like epileptic seizures of WAG/Rij rats via matrix metalloproteinase inhibition. Neurochem. Int. 59, 563–566 10.1016/j.neuint.2011.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Kowluru R. A., Mohammad G., dos Santos J. M., Zhong Q. (2011). Abrogation of MMP-9 gene protects against the development of retinopathy in diabetic mice by preventing mitochondrial damage. Diabetes 60, 3023–3033 10.2337/db11-0816 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Kuzniewska B., Rejmak E., Malik A. R., Jaworski J., Kaczmarek L., Kalita K. (2013). Brain-derived neurotrophic factor induces matrix metalloproteinases-9 expression in neurons via the the serum response factor/c-Fos pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 2149–2162 10.1128/MCB.00008-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Labrie M., St-Pierre Y. (2013). Epigenetic regulation of mmp-9 gene expression. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 70, 3109–3124 10.5713/ajas.2012.12529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Larsen P. H., Wells J. E., Stallcup W. B., Opdenakker G., Yong V. W. (2003). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 facilitates remyelination in part by processing the inhibitory NG2 proteoglycan. J. Neurosci. 23, 11127–11135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Lee C. M., Jang D., Cheong S. J., Jeong M. H., Kim E. M., Kim D. W., et al. (2012). Optical imaging of MMP expression and cancer progression in an inflammation-induced colon cancer model. Int. J. Cancer 131, 1846–1853 10.1002/ijc.27451 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Leigh M. J., Nguyen D. V., Mu Y., Winarni T. I., Schneider A., Chechi T., et al. (2013). A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of minocycline in children and adolescents with fragile × syndrome. J. Dev. Behav. Pediatr. 34, 147–155 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318287cd17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Lin K. T., Sloniowski S., Ethell D. W., Ethell I. M. (2008). Ephrin-B2-induced cleavage of EphB2 receptor is mediated by matrix metalloproteinases to trigger cell repulsion. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 28969–28979 10.1074/jbc.M804401200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Liu Y., Brown S., Shaikh J., Fishback J. A., Matsumoto R. R. (2008). Relationship between methamphetamine exposure and matrix metalloproteinase 9 expression. Neuroreport 19, 1407–1409 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32830dd606 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Lonskaya I., Partridge J., Lalchandani R. R., Chung A., Lee T., Vicini S., et al. (2013). Soluble ICAM-5, a product of activity dependent proteolysis, increases mEPSC frequency and dendritic expression of GluA1. PLoS One 8:e69136 10.1371/journal.pone.0069136 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Lukasiuk K., Wilczynski G. M., Kaczmarek L. (2011). Extracellular proteases in epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 96, 191–206 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2011.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Meighan S. E., Meighan P. C., Choudhury P., Davis C. J., Olson M. L., Zornes P. A., et al. (2006). Effects of extracellular matrix-degrading proteases matrix metalloproteinases 3 and 9 on spatial learning and synaptic plasticity. J. Neurochem. 96, 1227–1241 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03565.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Meyer D., Bonhoeffer T., Scheuss V. (2014). Balance and stability of synaptic structures during synaptic plasticity. Neuron 82, 430–443 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Michaluk P., Kaczmarek L. (2007). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 in glutamate-dependent adult brain function and dysfunction. Cell Death Differ. 14, 1255–1258 10.1038/sj.cdd.4402141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Michaluk P., Kolodziej L., Mioduszewska B., Wilczynski G. M., Dzwonek J., Jaworski J., et al. (2007). β-dystroglycan as a target for MMP-9, in response to enhanced neuronal activity. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 16036–16041 10.1074/jbc.m700641200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Michaluk P., Mikasova L., Groc L., Frischknecht R., Choquet D., Kaczmarek L. (2009). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 controls NMDA receptor surface diffusion through integrin beta1 signaling. J. Neurosci. 29, 6007–6012 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5346-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Michaluk P., Wawrzyniak M., Alot P., Szczot M., Wyrembek P., Mercik K., et al. (2011). Influence of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 on dendritic spine morphology. J. Cell Sci. 124, 3369–3380 10.1242/jcs.090852 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Mizoguchi H., Nakade J., Tachibana M., Ibi D., Someya E., Koike H., et al. (2011a). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 contributes to kindled seizure development in pentylenetetrazole-treated mice by converting pro-BDNF to mature BDNF in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 31, 12963–12971 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3118-11.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Mizoguchi H., Yamada K., Nabeshima T. (2011b). Matrix metalloproteinases contribute to neuronal dysfunction in animal models of drug dependence, Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy. Biochem. Res. Int. 2011:681385 10.1155/2011/681385 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mollayeva T., Colantonio A., Mollayeva S., Shapiro C. M. (2013). Screening for sleep dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Sleep Med. 14, 1235–1246 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Morrison C. J., Butler G. S., Rodriguez D., Overall C. M. (2009). Matrix metalloproteinase proteomics: substrates, targets and therapy. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 645–653 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Multani P., Myers R. H., Blume H. W., Schomer D. L., Sotrel A. (1994). Neocortical dendritic pathology in human partial epilepsy: a quantitative Golgi study. Epilepsia 35, 728–736 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02503.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Murai K. K., Pasquale E. B. (2004). Eph receptors, ephrins and synaptic function. Neuroscientist 10, 304–314 10.1177/1073858403262221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Nagase H., Woessner J. F., Jr. (1999). Matrix metalloproteinases. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 21491–21494 10.1074/jbc.274.31.21491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Nagy V., Bozdagi O., Matynia A., Balcerzyk M., Okulski P., Dzwonek J., et al. (2006). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is required for hippocampal late-phase long-term potentiation and memory. J. Neurosci. 26, 1923–1934 10.1523/jneurosci.4359-05.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Nakamura H., Fujii Y., Inoki I., Sugimoto K., Tanzawa K., Matsuki H., et al. (2000). Brevican is degraded by matrix metalloproteinases and aggrecanase-1 (ADAMTS4) at different sites. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 38885–38890 10.1074/jbc.m003875200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Nedivi E., Hevroni D., Naot D., Israeli D., Citri Y. (1993). Numerous candidate plasticity-related genes revealed by differential cDNA cloning. Nature 363, 718–722 10.1038/363718a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Nusser Z., Lujan R., Laube G., Roberts J. D., Molnar E., Somogyi P. (1998). Cell type and pathway dependence of synaptic AMPA receptor number and variability in the hippocampus. Neuron 21, 545–559 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80565-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Okulski P., Jay T. M., Jaworski J., Duniec K., Dzwonek J., Konopacki F. A., et al. (2007). TIMP-1 abolishes MMP-9-dependent long-lasting long-term potentiation in the prefrontal cortex. Biol. Psychiatry 62, 359–362 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Overall C. M. (2002). Molecular determinants of metalloproteinase substrate specificity: matrix metalloproteinase substrate binding domains, modules and exosites. Mol. Biotechnol. 22, 51–86 10.1385/mb:22:1:051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Pal-Ghosh S., Blanco T., Tadvalkar G., Pajoohesh-Ganji A., Parthasarathy A., Zieske J. D., et al. (2011). MMP9 cleavage of the β4 integrin ectodomain leads to recurrent epithelial erosions in mice. J. Cell Sci. 124, 2666–2675 10.1242/jcs.085480 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Paribello C., Tao L., Folino A., Berry-Kravis E., Tranfaglia M., Ethell I. M., et al. (2010). Open-label add-on treatment trial of minocycline in fragile × syndrome. BMC Neurol. 10:91 10.1186/1471-2377-10-91 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Peixoto R. T., Kunz P. A., Kwon H., Mabb A. M., Sabatini B. L., Philpot B. D., et al. (2012). Transsynaptic signaling by activity-dependent cleavage of neuroligin-1. Neuron 76, 396–409 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Peng H. B., Ali A. A., Daggett D. F., Rauvala H., Hassell J. R., Smalheiser N. R. (1998). The relationship between perlecan and dystroglycan and its implication in the formation of the neuromuscular junction. Cell Adhes. Commun. 5, 475–489 10.3109/15419069809005605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Penzes P., Cahill M. E., Jones K. A., VanLeeuwen J.-E., Woolfrey K. M. (2011). Dendritic spine pathology in neuropsychiatric disorders. Nat. Neurosci. 14, 285–293 10.1038/nn.2741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Pirici D., Pirici I., Mogoanta L., Margaritescu O., Tudorica V., Margaritescu C., et al. (2012). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in the nuclear compartment of neurons and glial cells in aging and stroke. Neuropathology 32, 492–504 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01279.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Ramón y Cajal S. (1888). Estructura de los centros nerviosos de las aves. Rev. Trim. Histol. Norm. Pat. 1, 1–10 [Google Scholar]
  132. Ramón y Cajal S. (1891). Sur la structure de l’écorce cérébrale de quelques mamifères. Cellule 7, 124–176 [Google Scholar]
  133. Ramón y Cajal S. (1893). Neue darstellung vom histologischen bau des centralnervensystem. Arch. Anat. Entwick. Anat. Abt. Suppl. 1893, 319–428 [Google Scholar]
  134. Ramón y Cajal S. (1899). Estudios sobre la cortexa cerebral humana: corteza visual. Rev. Trim. Microgr. 4, 1–63 [Google Scholar]
  135. Represa A., Jorquera I., Le Gal La Salle G., Ben-Ari Y. (1993). Epilepsy induced collateral sprouting of hippocampal mossy fibers: does it induce the development of ectopic synapses with granule cell dendrites? Hippocampus 3, 257–268 10.1002/hipo.450030303 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Rezaei S., Asgari K., Yousefzadeh S., Moosavi H. A., Kazemnejad E. (2012). Effects of neurosurgical treatment and severity of head injury on cognitive functioning, general health and incidence of mental disorders in patients with traumatic brain injury. Arch. Trauma Res. 1, 93–100 10.5812/atr.6546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Rivera S., Khrestchatisky M., Kaczmarek L., Rosenberg G. A., Jaworski D. M. (2010). Metzincin proteases and their inhibitors: foes or friends in nervous system physiology? J. Neurosci. 30, 15337–15357 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3467-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Roghani M., Becherer J. D., Moss M. L., Atherton R. E., Erdjument-Bromage H., Arribas J., et al. (1999). Metalloprotease-disintegrin MDC9: intracellular maturation and catalytic activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 3531–3540 10.1074/jbc.274.6.3531 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Rosenblum G., Van Den Steen P. E., Cohen S. R., Grossmann J. G., Frenkel J., Sertchook R., et al. (2007). Insights into the structure and domain flexibility of full-length pro-matrix metalloproteinase-9/gelatinase B. Structure 15, 1227–1236 10.1016/j.str.2007.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Roy R., Zurakowski D., Pories S., Moss M. L., Moses M. A. (2011). Potential of fluorescent metalloproteinase substrates for cancer detection. Clin. Biochem. 44, 1434–1439 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2011.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Rudelli R. D., Brown W. T., Wisniewski K., Jenkins E. C., Laure-Kamionowska M., Connell F., et al. (1985). Adult fragile X syndrome: clinico-neuropathologic findings. Acta Neuropathol. 67, 289–295 10.1007/bf00687814 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Rybakowski J. K., Remlinger-Molenda A., Czech-Kucharska A., Wojcicka M., Michalak M., Losy J. (2013). Increased serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels in young patients during bipolar depression. J. Affect. Disord. 146, 286–289 10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Rylski M., Amborska R., Zybura K., Michaluk P., Bielinska B., Konopacki F. A., et al. (2009). JunB is a repressor of MMP-9 transcription in depolarized rat brain neurons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 40, 98–110 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Rylski M., Amborska R., Zybura K., Mioduszewska B., Michaluk P., Jaworski J., et al. (2008). Yin Yang 1 is a critical repressor of matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression in brain neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35140–35153 10.1074/jbc.M804540200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Sala C., Segal M. (2014). The locus of structural and functional plasticity. Physiol. Rev. 94, 141–188 10.1152/physrev.00012.2013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Samochowiec A., Grzywacz A., Kaczmarek L., Bienkowski P., Samochowiec J., Mierzejewski P., et al. (2010). Functional polymorphism of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) gene in alcohol dependence: family and case control study. Brain Res. 1327, 103–106 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.072 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Sarkisova K., van Luijtelaar G. (2011). The WAG/Rij strain: a genetic animal model of absence epilepsy with comorbidity of depression [corrected]. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 35, 854–876 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Sbai O., Ferhat L., Bernard A., Gueye Y., Ould-Yahoui A., Thiolloy S., et al. (2008). Vesicular trafficking and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases-2, -9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in neuronal cells. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 39, 549–568 10.1016/j.mcn.2008.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Sbai O., Ould-Yahoui A., Ferhat L., Gueye Y., Bernard A., Charrat E., et al. (2010). Differential vesicular distribution and trafficking of MMP-2, MMP-9 and their inhibitors in astrocytes. Glia 58, 344–366 10.1002/glia.20927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Scharfman H. E. (2002). Epilepsy as an example of neural plasticity. Neuroscientist 8, 154–173 10.1177/107385840200800211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Scherer R., Mcintyre J. O., Matrisian L. (2008). Imaging matrix metalloproteinases in cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 27, 679–690 10.1007/s10555-008-9152-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Schonbeck U., Mach F., Libby P. (1998). Generation of biologically active IL-1β by matrix metalloproteinases: a novel caspase-1-independent pathway of IL-1β processing. J. Immunol. 161, 3340–3346 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Shen H. W., Toda S., Moussawi K., Bouknight A., Zahm D. S., Kalivas P. W. (2009). Altered dendritic spine elasticity in cocaine-withdrawn rats. J. Neurosci. 29, 2876–2884 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5638-08.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Sheu B. C., Hsu S. M., Ho H. N., Lien H. C., Huang S. C., Lin R. H. (2001). A novel role of metalloproteinase in cancer-mediated immunosuppression. Cancer Res. 61, 237–242 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Spolidoro M., Putignano E., Munafo C., Maffei L., Pizzorusso T. (2012). Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases prevents the potentiation of nondeprived-eye responses after monocular deprivation in juvenile rats. Cereb. Cortex 22, 725–734 10.1093/cercor/bhr158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Stawarski M., Rutkowska-Wlodarczyk I., Zeug A., Bijata M., Madej H., Kaczmarek L., et al. (2014). Genetically encoded FRET-based biosensor for imaging MMP-9 activity. Biomaterials 35, 1402–1410 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Stute J., Pourmotabbed T., Tschesche H. (2003). Kinetic analysis of the binding of hemopexin-like domain of gelatinase B cloned and expressed in Pichia pastoris to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1. J. Protein Chem. 22, 509–514 10.1023/b:jopc.0000005499.51466.50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Suenaga N., Ichiyama T., Kubota M., Isumi H., Tohyama J., Furukawa S. (2008). Roles of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1 in acute encephalopathy following prolonged febrile seizures. J. Neurol. Sci. 266, 126–130 10.1016/j.jns.2007.09.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Sugita S., Saito F., Tang J., Satz J., Campbell K., Sudhof T. C. (2001). A stoichiometric complex of neurexins and dystroglycan in brain. J. Cell Biol. 154, 435–445 10.1083/jcb.200105003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Susaki E. A., Tainaka K., Perrin D., Kishino F., Tawara T., Watanabe T. M., et al. (2014). Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Suzuki F., Makiura Y., Guilhem D., Sorensen J. C., Onteniente B. (1997). Correlated axonal sprouting and dendritic spine formation during kainate-induced neuronal morphogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. Exp. Neurol. 145, 203–213 10.1006/exnr.1997.6469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Swann J. W., Al-Noori S., Jiang M., Lee C. L. (2000). Spine loss and other dendritic abnormalities in epilepsy. Hippocampus 10, 617–625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Szepesi Z., Bijata M., Ruszczycki B., Kaczmarek L., Wlodarczyk J. (2013). Matrix metalloproteinases regulate the formation of dendritic spine head protrusions during chemically induced long-term potentiation. PLoS One 8:e63314 10.1371/journal.pone.0063314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Szepesi Z., Hosy E., Ruszczycki B., Bijata M., Pyskaty M., Bikbaev A., et al. (2014). Synaptically released matrix metalloproteinases activity in control of structural plasticity and the cel surface distribution of GluA1-AMPA receptors. PLoS One 9:e98274 10.1371/journal.pone.0098274 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Szklarczyk A., Lapinska J., Rylski M., McKay R. D., Kaczmarek L. (2002). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 undergoes expression and activation during dendritic remodeling in adult hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 22, 920–930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Takacs E., Nyilas R., Szepesi Z., Baracskay P., Karlsen B., Rosvold T., et al. (2010). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 activity increased by two different types of epileptic seizures that do not induce neuronal death: a possible role in homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neurochem. Int. 56, 799–809 10.1016/j.neuint.2010.03.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Takumi Y., Ramirez-Leon V., Laake P., Rinvik E., Ottersen O. P. (1999). Different modes of expression of AMPA and NMDA receptors in hippocampal synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 2, 618–624 10.1038/10172 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Tian L., Stefanidakis M., Ning L., Van Lint P., Nyman-Huttunen H., Libert C., et al. (2007). Activation of NMDA receptors promotes dendritic spine development through MMP-mediated ICAM-5 cleavage. J. Cell Biol. 178, 687–700 10.1083/jcb.200612097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Tønnesen J., Katona G., Rózsa B., Nägerl U. V. (2014). Spine neck plasticity regulates compartmentalization of synapses. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 678–685 10.1038/nn.3682 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Tsien R. Y. (2013). Very long-term memories may be stored in the pattern of holes in the perineuronal net. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 110, 12456–12461 10.1073/pnas.1310158110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Uchida Y., Goshima Y. (2005). [Molecular mechanism of axon guidance mediated by phosphorylation of CRMP2]. Seikagaku 77, 1424–1427 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Utari A., Chonchaiya W., Rivera S. M., Schneider A., Hagerman R. J., Faradz S. M., et al. (2010). Side effects of minocycline treatment in patients with fragile X syndrome and exploration of outcome measures. Am. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 115, 433–443 10.1352/1944-7558-115.5.433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Vaisar T., Kassim S. Y., Gomez I. G., Green P. S., Hargarten S., Gough P. J., et al. (2009). MMP-9 sheds the β2 integrin subunit (CD18) from macrophages. Mol. Cell Proteomics 8, 1044–1060 10.1074/mcp.m800449-mcp200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Van den Steen P. E., Proost P., Wuyts A., Van Damme J., Opdenakker G. (2000). Neutrophil gelatinase B potentiates interleukin-8 tenfold by aminoterminal processing, whereas it degrades CTAP-III, PF-4 and GRO-α and leaves RANTES and MCP-2 intact. Blood 96, 2673–2681 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Van den Steen P. E., Van Aelst I., Hvidberg V., Piccard H., Fiten P., Jacobsen C., et al. (2006). The hemopexin and O-glycosylated domains tune gelatinase B/MMP-9 bioavailability via inhibition and binding to cargo receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 18626–18637 10.1074/jbc.m512308200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Van Wart H. E., Birkedal-Hansen H. (1990). The cysteine switch: a principle of regulation of metalloproteinase activity with potential applicability to the entire matrix metalloproteinase gene family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 87, 5578–5582 10.1073/pnas.87.14.5578 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Vandooren J., Van den Steen P. E., Opdenakker G. (2013). Biochemistry and molecular biology of gelatinase B or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9): the next decade. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 48, 222–272 10.3109/10409238.2013.770819 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Verslegers M., Lemmens K., Van Hove I., Moons L. (2013). Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 as promising benefactors in development, plasticity and repair of the nervous system. Prog. Neurobiol. 105, 60–78 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Wallis de Vries B. M., Hillebrands J. L., Van Dam G. M., Tio R. A., De Jong J. S., Slart R. H. J. A., et al. (2009). Multispectral near-infrared fluorescence molecular imaging of matrix metalloproteinases in a human carotid plaque using a matrix-degrading metalloproteinase-sensitive activatable fluorescent probe. Circulation 119, e534–e536 10.1161/circulationaha.108.821389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Wang X., Jung J., Asahi M., Chwang W., Russo L., Moskowitz M. A., et al. (2000). Effects of matrix metalloproteinase-9 gene knock-out on morphological and motor outcomes after traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 20, 7037–7042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Wang X. B., Bozdagi O., Nikitczuk J. S., Zhai Z. W., Zhou Q., Huntley G. W. (2008). Extracellular proteolysis by matrix metalloproteinase-9 drives dendritic spine enlargement and long-term potentiation coordinately. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 105, 19520–19525 10.1073/pnas.0807248105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Wang X. Q., Sun P., Paller A. S. (2003). Ganglioside GM3 inhibits matrix metalloproteinase-9 activation and disrupts its association with integrin. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 25591–25599 10.1074/jbc.m302211200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Wiera G., Wójtowicz T., Lebida K., Piotrowska A., Drulis-Fajdasz D., Gomukiewicz A., et al. (2012). Long term potentiation affects intracellular metalloproteinases activity in the mossy fiber-CA3 pathway. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 50, 147–159 10.1016/j.mcn.2012.04.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Wiera G., Wozniak G., Bajor M., Kaczmarek L., Mozrzymas J. W. (2013). Maintenance of long-term potentiation in hippocampal mossy fiber-CA3 pathway requires fine-tuned MMP-9 proteolytic activity. Hippocampus 23, 529–543 10.1002/hipo.22112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Wilczynski G. M., Konopacki F. A., Wilczek E., Lasiecka Z., Gorlewicz A., Michaluk P., et al. (2008). Important role of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in epileptogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 180, 1021–1035 10.1083/jcb.200708213 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Williams J. (2003). Learning and behavior in children with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 4, 107–111 10.1016/s1525-5050(03)00024-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Wlodarczyk J., Mukhina I., Kaczmarek L., Dityatev A. (2011). Extracellular matrix molecules, their receptors and secreted proteases in synaptic plasticity. Dev. Neurobiol. 71, 1040–1053 10.1002/dneu.20958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Wong M. (2005). Modulation of dendritic spines in epilepsy: cellular mechanisms and functional implications. Epilepsy Behav. 7, 569–577 10.1016/j.yebeh.2005.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Wong M., Guo D. (2013). Dendritic spine pathology in epilepsy: cause or consequence? Neuroscience 251, 141–150 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Yan P., Hu X., Song H., Yin K., Bateman R. J., Cirrito J. R., et al. (2006). Matrix metalloproteinase-9 degrades amyloid-β fibrils in vitro and compact plaques in situ. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 24566–24574 10.1074/jbc.m602440200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Yang Y., Candelario-Jalil E., Thompson J. F., Cuadrado E., Estrada E. Y., Rosell A., et al. (2010). Increased intranuclear matrix metalloproteinase activity in neurons interferes with oxidative DNA repair in focal cerebral ischemia. J. Neurochem. 112, 134–149 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06433.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Ye S. (2000). Polymorphism in matrix metalloproteinase gene promoters: implication in regulation of gene expression and susceptibility of various diseases. Matrix Biol. 19, 623–629 10.1016/s0945-053x(00)00102-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Yeghiazaryan M., Żybura-Broda K., Cabaj A., Wlodarczyk J., Slawinska U., Rylski M., et al. (2012). Fine-structural distribution of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activities in the rat skeletal muscle upon training: a study by high-resolution in situ zymography. Histochem. Cell Biol. 138, 75–87 10.1007/s00418-012-0940-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Yoshimura T., Kawano Y., Arimura N., Kawabata S., Kikuchi A., Kaibuchi K. (2005). GSK-3β regulates phosphorylation of CRMP-2 and neuronal polarity. Cell 120, 137–149 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Yu Q., Stamenkovic I. (2000). Cell surface-localized matrix metalloproteinase-9 proteolytically activates TGF-β and promotes tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 14, 163–176 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Yuan M., Zhan Q., Duan X., Song B., Zeng S., Chen X., et al. (2013). A functional polymorphism at miR-491–5p binding site in the 3’-UTR of MMP-9 gene confers increased risk for atherosclerotic cerebral infarction in a Chinese population. Atherosclerosis 226, 447–452 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.11.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Zagulska-Szymczak S., Filipkowski R. K., Kaczmarek L. (2001). Kainate-induced genes in the hippocampus: lessons from expression patterns. Neurochem. Int. 38, 485–501 10.1016/s0197-0186(00)00101-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  198. Zhang J. W., Deb S., Gottschall P. E. (2000). Regional and age-related expression of gelatinases in the brains of young and old rats after treatment with kainic acid. Neurosci. Lett. 295, 9–12 10.1016/s0304-3940(00)01582-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Zhou F. C., Anthony B., Dunn K. W., Lindquist W. B., Xu Z. C., Deng P. (2007). Chronic alcohol drinking alters neuronal dendritic spines in the brain reward center nucleus accumbens. Brain Res. 1134, 148–161 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.11.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Zhu D., Larin K. V., Luo Q., Tuchin V. V. (2013). Recent progress in tissue optical clearing. Laser Photon. Rev. 7, 732–757 10.1002/lpor.201200056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Zimowska M., Swierczynska M., Ciemerych M. A. (2013). Nuclear MMP-9 role in the regulation of rat skeletal myoblasts proliferation. Biol. Cell 105, 334–344 10.1111/boc.201300020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Neuroanatomy are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES