Skip to main content
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal logoLink to Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
. 2012 Nov;6(3):18–20. doi: 10.5704/MOJ.1207.015

Morphometric Study of the Atlas Vertebra using Manual Method

Shilpa N Gosavi 1, P Vatsalaswamy 2
PMCID: PMC4093604  PMID: 25279050

Abstract

Abstract

The atlas (first cervical vertebra) has undergone many structural modifications. It is critically located and close to the ‘life centres’. For this study, one hundred dried intact human atlas vertebrae from the Indian population were measured using a digital Vernier calliper that provides accurate resolution up to 0.01 mm. The distance between the tips of the transverse process, the outer and the inner distance between the foramen transversaria and various diameters of vertebral foramen were measured. The mean width of the measured atlases was 69.37 mm. The mean distance between the lateral margins of foramen transversaria was 55.66 mm and the inner distance was 45.93 mm. The mean thickness of vertebral artery grooves was 3.72 ± 1.06 mm. The observations made in the present study may help in improving understanding of various bony dimensions while operating close to important structures like nerve roots and the vertebral artery.

Key Words

Atlas, Atypical cervical vertebra, C1, morphology

Introduction

The atlas vertebra has many unique features. It is located at a critical point close to the vital centres of the medulla oblongata, which can get compressed by a dislocation of the atlanto-axial complex or instability of atlanto-occipital joint. Therefore, reduction and rebuilding of the stability of this complex is important. A short segment posterior fixation technique is often adopted to preserve the motion of the atlanto-occipital joint 1. Hence the aim of the present study was to evaluate the metrical details of the atlas in the Indian population.

Materials and Methods

One hundred dried human atlases of unknown sex, obtained from the Department of Anatomy of four medical colleges were studied. All samples were drawn from the Indian population. Atlases with pathological features were excluded from the study. The following parameters were measured for each atlas using a digital Vernier calliper that provides accurate resolution up to 0.01mm. Each measurement was taken three times to minimize error. All measurements were performed by the first author for the sake of consistency.

The distance between the tips of the transverse processes of the atlas (atlas width, TD), the distance between the most lateral margins of the two foramina transversaria (outer distance, OD) , and the distance between the medial margins of the two foramina transversaria (inner distance, ID) were all measured. The maximum anteroposterior (A-P) diameter of the vertebral foramen was measured in the sagittal plane and the minimum A-P diameter was measured in the parasagittal plane. The maximum transverse diameter of the vertebral foramen was measured and the shape, anteroposterior and transverse diameters of the superior articular facet as well as of the inferior articular facet were noted bilaterally.

We also measured the thickness of the posterior arch at the groove for the vertebral artery on both sides. The height of the anterior as well as posterior arches in the midline was measured from its superior border to its inferior border. The vertical height of the facet of the dens was measured as the maximum vertical distance at midline, and the maximum transverse width of the facet of the dens was measured as the maximum transverse distance. The mean, range and standard deviation were calculated for all measurements for the 100 vertebrae. Significant difference was calculated using the Z test and p<= 0.05.

Results

Fifteen parameters were studied for the hundred atlases. Measurement results were analysed and are shown in Tables I, II and III.

The mean width of the atlases was 69.37 mm (Table I), and the mean thickness of the vertebral artery groove was 3.72 mm on the right side and 3.70 mm on the left side (Table III) The superior articular facet was oval in 74% of the atlases with the anteroposterior diameter larger than the transverse diameter in the majority of samples, whereas the facets of 26% were kidney shaped. The anterior edge of these facets was nearer to the midline than to their posterior edge. Their diameters are posted in Table II. There was not a statistically significant difference when comparing diameters. The shape of the inferior articular facet was circular in 71% and oval in 29% of atlases. The mean anterior arch height was 10.33 ± 1.67 mm and the mean height of the posterior arch was 8.61 ± 1.77 mm. (Table III)

Table I: Anatomical parameters of atlas.

Table I: Anatomical parameters of atlas

Table III: Dimensions of some parameters of atlas.

Table III: Dimensions of some parameters of atlas

Table II: Diameters of articular facets of atlas.

Table II: Diameters of articular facets of atlas

Discussion

The atlas supports the skull and is uniquely positioned in the atlantoaxial complex. As new surgical techniques and instruments for the treatment of unstable cervical spine continue to evolve, detailed knowledge about this bone becomes even more essential 2. Table IV gives a comparison of certain atlas parameters in previously published studies to the present study. From Table IV, it is clear that there is some difference in such values for various parameters. This variation is perhaps due to the difference in the races to which the atlases belonged. Textbooks of anatomy describe racial differences in bones, particularly the skull. It is therefore, not illogical to say that the differences noted above are due to racial differences in the atlas.

Table IV: Diameters of articular facets of atlas.

Table IV: Diameters of articular facets of atlas

Cacciola et al.5 reported that in 76% of the vertebrae studied, the superior articular facet was oval in shape and kidney shaped in 24%. Senegul and Kodiglu2 observed oval superior articular facets in 72% and kidney shaped in 28%. As noted above, our measurements were similar regarding facet shape. Lang 6 found that facets were sometimes completely divided into a larger anterior and a smaller posterior section; we found a similar variation in the two facets of the vertebrae bilaterally.

The inferior articular facets were flat or slightly concave facing medially and slightly backwards. In our study, 71% were circular with similar A-P and transverse diameters and 29% were oval. Cacciola et al 5. observed circular inferior articular facets in most vertebrae, and Senegul and Kodiglu 2 also noted circular or slightly droplet shaped facets. The groove on the superior surface of the posterior arch of atlas represents the exact location of the vertebral artery 2. The mean thickness of this groove was 3.72 ± 1.06 mm in the present study, whereas Senegul and Kodiglu 2 reported thickness 5.05 mm and Ebraheim et al. 7 as 4.1 ± 1.2 mm. Senegul and Kodiglu 2 explained that this thickness is sufficient for some fixation techniques such as clamp and hook plating and atlanto-axial wiring. Tan et al. 8 reported groove thickness of 4.65 mm in their study on manual and radiological measurements of fifty isolated atlases. In four of their cases (8%), the groove was less than 4 mm in thickness. In the present study, there were 65 cases in which the thickness was <4 mm.

In their study on cadaveric specimens and dry bones Cacciola et al. 5 observed that the groove for the vertebral artery was completely converted into a foramen only in one out of twenty sides. In our study on hundred atlases such a foramen was observed on the right side in two and bilaterally in one.

Conclusion

We studied one hundred dried atlas vertebrae deriving from the Indian population to give us the opportunity to analyse metrical data. The mean width of the atlas was 69.37 mm in the present study. The thickness of the vertebral artery groove was 3.72 mm on the right side and 3.70 mm on the left side. The observations made in the present study may be helpful to neurosurgeons who routinely operate close to important structures such as nerve roots and vertebral artery in the atlanto-occipital area.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. B. R. Zambare, Head of the Department, Dept. of Anatomy, P.D.V.V.P.F. Medical College, Ahmednagar, for his continuous support and encouragement. We are in debt to Dr. V. R. Mysorekar, former Head of the Department of Anatomy of various medical colleges, for his valuable suggestions and help in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  • 1.Hanson PB, Montesano PX, Sharkey NA. Anatomic and biochemical assessment of transarticular screw fixation for the atlanto-axial instability. Spine. 1991;16:1141–1145. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Senegul G, Kodiglu HH. Morphometric anatomy of atlas and axis vertebra. Turkish Neurosurgery. 2006;16(2):69–76. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lang J. Craniocervical region, osteology and articulations. Neuro Ortho. 1986;1:67–92. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Heggeness MH, Doherty BJ. The quantitative anatomy of the atlas. Spine. 1994;19:2497–2500. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199411001-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cacciola F, Phalke U, Goel A. Vertebral artery in relationship to C1 –C2 vertebra: An anatomic study. Neurology India. 2004;52(2):178–184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lang J. Skull Base and Related structures. Struttgart: Schattauer; 1995. pp. 292–292. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Lin D, Ahmad M, Heck BE. The quantitative anatomy of the vertebral artery groove of atlas and its relation to the posterior atlanto-axial approach. Spine. 1998;23:320–323. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199802010-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tan M, Wang H, Wang Y, Zang G, Yi P, Li Z, Yang F. Morphometric evaluation of screw fixation in Atlas via posterior arch and lateral mass. Spine. 2003;28(9):888–895. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000058719.48596.CC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yu CK, Wong HY, Vivek AS, SeTo BC. Unlocked nailing vs. interlocking nailing for Winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fractures. Is there a difference? Mal Orth J. 2008;2:23–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mukherjee SK, Jain V. Neglected femoral diaphyseal fracture. Clin Orthop. 2005;431:72–79. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000152368.99509.d9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Karapinar L, kaya A, Ozturk H, Altay T, Kayali C. Leg length discrepancies in adult femoral shaft fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. Turkish Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery. 2009;15:256–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abrahan LM, Te CV, Cruz FD. Delayed open intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Tech Orthop. 2006;21:88–98. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lin HT, Ng WM, Kwan MK, Fathi Alzudeen LK, Tay PCM. Use of unlocked intramedullary nailing in Winquist type I and II femoral isthmus fracture. Mal Orth J. 2008;4:17–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Selvakumar K, Saw KY, Fathima M. Comparison between reamed and unreamed nailing of cloed femoral fractures. Med J Malaysia. 2001;56(D):24–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Malik MHA, Harwood P, Diggle P, Khan SA. Factors influencing rates of infection and nonunion in intramedullary nailing. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:556–560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Harris I, Hatfield A, Donald G, Walton J. Outcome after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73:387–389. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.t01-1-02655.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kent MF, Arora A, Owen PJ, Khanduia V. Assessment and correction of femoral malrotation following intramedullary nailing of the femur. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:580–584. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shepherd LE, Shean CJ, Gelalis ID, Lee J, Carter VS. Prospective randomized study of reamed versus unreamed femoral intramedullary naling: An assessment of procedures. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15:28–33. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200101000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal are provided here courtesy of Malaysian Orthopedic Association

RESOURCES