Skip to main content
PMC home page
BMC Genetics logoLink to BMC Genetics
. 2014 Jun 14;15:69. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-69

Gene-carbohydrate and gene-fiber interactions and type 2 diabetes in diverse populations from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) as part of the Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) study

Raquel Villegas 1,✉, Robert J Goodloe 3, Bob E McClellan Jr 3, Jonathan Boston 3, Dana C Crawford 2,3
PMCID: PMC4094781  PMID: 24929251

Abstract

Background

Both environmental and genetic factors impact type 2 diabetes (T2D). To identify such modifiers, we genotyped 15 T2D-associated variants from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in 6,414 non-Hispanic whites, 3,073 non-Hispanic blacks, and 3,633 Mexican American participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) and evaluated interactions between these variants and carbohydrate intake and fiber intake.

Results

We calculated a genetic risk score (GRS) with the 15 SNPs. The odds ratio for T2D with each GRS point was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.14) for non-Hispanic whites, 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02-1.13) for non-Hispanic blacks, and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.06-1.17) for Mexican Americans. We identified two gene-carbohydrate interactions (P < 0.05) in non-Hispanic whites (with CDKAL1 rs471253 and FTO rs8050136), two in non-Hispanic blacks (with IGFBP2 rs4402960 and THADA rs7578597), and two in Mexican Americans (with NOTCH2 rs1092398 and TSPAN8-LGRS rs7961581). We found three gene-fiber interactions in non-Hispanic whites (with ADAMT59 rs4607103, CDKN2A/2B rs1801282, and FTO rs8050136), two in non-Hispanic blacks (with ADAMT59 rs4607103 and THADA rs7578597), and two in Mexican Americans (with THADA rs7578597 and TSPAN8-LGRS rs796158) at the P < 0.05 level. Interactions between the GRS and nutrients failed to reach significance in all the racial/ethnic groups.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that dietary carbohydrates and fiber may modify T2D-associated variants, highlighting the importance of dietary nutrients in predicting T2D risk.

Keywords: Type 2 diabetes, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Gene

Background

For the past few years, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of common variants associated with human diseases and traits, including type 2 diabetes (T2D). More than 40 genetic susceptibility loci have been reported for T2D and most reported variants have small to moderate effects and account for only a small proportion of the heritability of T2D [1]. Both environmental and genetic factors impact T2D. However, despite evidence that genetic variants and environmental factors are associated with T2D, relatively few studies have been published investigating the interaction between the two.

Most of the loci identified to date by GWAS of T2D appear to be involved in beta-cell function rather than insulin resistance [2]. GWAS of T2D-associated quantitative traits have also found more variants associated with insulin secretion rather than insulin resistance [3]. Insulin is secreted in response to elevated blood glucose concentration; thus, dietary carbohydrates, which influence glucose concentration and insulin demands [4], may modify associations between GWAS variants and T2D. Fiber, on the other hand, may influence the amount or rate of carbohydrate absorbed and, thus, may modify associations between GWAS variants and T2D. Fiber has been associated with lower risk of T2D [5,6].

In this study, we investigated associations between T2D and genetic variants discovered by GWAS in three racial/ethnic groups and modifications of these associations by carbohydrate and fiber intake. We used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) as accessed by the Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE), a study site of the larger Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) I study established in 2008 to characterize GWAS-identified variants in diverse population-based studies [7]. We present here an investigation of the effects of 15 T2D-associated SNPs and T2D interactions with carbohydrate and fiber intake among non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican Americans. We also evaluated the combined effect of genetic variants by calculating a genetic risk score (GRS) and examined possible interactions of the GRS with carbohydrate intake and fiber across the three racial/ethnic groups.

Results

Table 1 displays descriptive statistics for the key variables in this study. On average, non-Hispanic whites were older than non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans. Non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans had higher mean carbohydrate intake levels (264.72 and 265.06 g/day) compared with non-Hispanic blacks (255.81 g/day). Non-Hispanic blacks had lower mean fiber intake (13.46 g/day) compared with Mexican-Americans (19.48) and non-Hispanic whites (16.63 g/day). The average BMI for all groups was in the overweight category (>25 kg/m2), and non-Hispanic whites had the lowest average BMI of the three groups.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for adult NHANES participants by population

  Non-Hispanic whites (n = 6,414) Non-Hispanic blacks (n = 3,073) Mexican Americans (n = 3,633)
% female
 55%
 56%
 51%
Mean age in years (±SD)
 52.77 (19.83)
 43.74 (17.29)
 43.56 (17.70)
Age range in years
 18-90
 18-90
 18-90
Mean BMI, kg/m 2 (±SD)
 27.38 (5.80)
 28.87 (7.00)
 28.16 (5.54)
BMI range, kg/m 2
11.7-64.5
 13.3-79.6
 15-59.7
Mean fiber in grams (±SD)
 16.63 (10.28)
 13.46 (9.53)
 19.48 (12.70)
Fiber range in grams
 0.0-145.35
 0.0-128.30
 0.0-111.79
Mean CH in grams (±SD)
 264.72 (128.05)
 255.81 (143.32)
 265.06 (130.95)
CH range in grams 2.8-1700.37 12.5-1330.9 2.66-1189.70
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: carbohydrates (CH), body mass index (BMI), standard deviation (SD).

We tested 15 previously identified T2D SNPs for associations with T2D in NHANES data (Additional file 1: Table S1). Analyses were adjusted for BMI, age, and sex and were stratified by race/ethnicity. Of the 15 SNPs tested, only 5 (33%) were associated with T2D in any one racial/ethnic group at P < 0.05. As expected, the most associations, four SNPs, were observed among non-Hispanic whites (CDKN2A/B rs10811661, SLC30A8 rs13266634, IGFBP2 rs4402960, and TCF7L2 rs7903146). Among non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans, only two SNPs were associated with T2D in each population. Only one of the variants, TCF7L2 rs7903146, was associated with T2D in all three racial/ethnic groups at P < 0.05. After applying the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, the significant P value threshold was 0.001. TCF7L2 rs7903146 in non-Hispanic blacks and, IGFBP2 rs4402960 in non-Hispanic whites, had a P value of <0.001 (Additional file 1: Table S2).

We then calculated a genetic risk score (GRS) based on all 15 SNPs. Risk alleles were defined by previously reported T2D GWAS results for all variants (Table 2). As expected, higher genetic risk scores were significantly associated with higher risk of T2D in models adjusted for age, sex, and BMI for all three racial/ethnic groups. The odds ratio for T2D for each GRS point (per risk allele) was 1.10 (95% CI: 1.05-1.14) for non-Hispanic whites, 1.07 (95% CI: 1.02-1.13) for non-Hispanic blacks, and 1.11 (95% CI: 1.06-1.17) for Mexican Americans. The OR for quintiles of the GRS were 1.00, 0.90, 1.36, 1.36 and 1.70 (p < 0.0001) for non-Hispanic whites, 1.00, 1.07, 1.30, 1.42 and 1.70 (p = 0.0004) for non-Hispanic blacks and 1.00, 1.21, 1.16, 1.58 and 1.80 (p < 0.0001) for Mexican Americans (Table 2).

Table 2.

Association between GRS and T2D*

 
 Non-Hispanic whites
  
 Non-Hispanic blacks
  
 Mexican Americans
  
  OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
GRS continuous
 1.1 (1.05-1.14)
 0.0001
 1.07 (1.02-1.13)
 0.0107
 1.11 (1.06-1.17)
 0.0001
Quintiles
  
  
  
  
  
  
Q1
 1.00
 <0.0001
 1.00
 0.004
 1.00
 <0.0001
Q2
 1.13 (0.83-1.55)
  
 1.07 (0.69-1.65)
  
 1.21 (0.86-1.72)
  
Q3
 0.90 (0.65-1.24)
  
 1.30 (0.88-1.91)
  
 1.16 (0.83-1.62)
  
Q4
 1.36 (1.05-1.77)
  
 1.42 (0.99-2.04)
  
 1.58 (1.12-2.22)
  
Q5 1.70 (1.26-2.29)   1.70 (1.13-2.56)   1.80 (1.33-2.44)  
Open in a new tab

*Adjusted for age, sex, and BMI.

Dietary modifiers

We tested for potential modifying effects of carbohydrate and fiber intake on genetic associations with T2D. To do this, we performed formal tests of interaction for all 15 SNPs and each dietary variable (Figures 1 and 2 and Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4). We identified several gene-environment interactions at a significance threshold of P < 0.05. Among non-Hispanic whites, we identified two SNP × carbohydrate interactions [CDKAL1 rs471253 (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.02-3.33) and FTO rs8050136; (OR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35-1.00)] and three gene-fiber interactions [ADAMT59 rs4607103 (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.22-2.29), CDKN2A/2B rs1801282 (OR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.4-0.95) and FTO rs8050136(OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.53-0.95)]. Among non-Hispanic blacks, we identified two carbohydrate-gene interactions [IGFBP2 rs4402960 (OR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.12-4.04) and THADA rs7578597 (OR = 2.16; 95% CI: 1.03-4.55)] and two gene-fiber interactions [ADAMT59 rs4607103 (OR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.24-2.58) and THADA rs7578597 (OR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.08-2.49)]. Among Mexican Americans we identified two gene-carbohydrate interactions [NOTCH2 rs1092398 (OR = 3.06; 95% CI: 1.05-8.93) and TSPAN8-LGRS rs7961581 (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.34-7.7)] and two gene-fiber interactions [THADA rs7578597 (OR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.17-0.69) and TSPAN8-LGRS rs7961581 (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.1-2.75)]. Interestingly, the ADAMT59 rs4607103-fiber interaction was observed among both non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks with consistent directions of effect for the interaction term. Likewise, the THADA rs7578597-fiber interaction term was observed among both non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans albeit with opposing directions of effect for the interaction term. No interaction terms for carbohydrates or fiber were significant across all three racial/ethnic groups. The P value after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was 0.0005, and none of the P values for interaction passed multiple testing (Additional file 1: Tables S3 and S4).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Interaction between carbohydrates and GWAS SNPS and T2D: the potential modifying effects of carbohydrate intake on the genetic associations for T2D are shown in this figure. OR and 95% CI for the interaction between each SNP and fiber are shown separately in the three racial/ethnic groups in 3 different columns and colors.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Interaction between fiber and GWAS SNPS and T2D: the potential modifying effects of fiber intake on the genetic associations for T2D are shown in this figure. OR and 95% CI for these interactions between SNPs and fiber are shown separately in the three racial/ethnic groups in 3 different columns and colors.

Finally, we tested for interactions of the GRS with carbohydrate and fiber intakes across all racial/ethnic groups. No interactions of the GRS with carbohydrate or fiber intake and T2D were found for any racial/ethnic group. While no interaction terms in any racial/ethnic group for fiber or carbohydrate intake were significant at P < 0.05, the interaction term for fiber and GRS among non-Hispanic whites was of marginal significance (P = 0.09; Table 3).

Table 3.

Association between interaction factors for genetic risk scores with nutrients and T2D*

 
 Non-Hispanic whites
  
 Non-Hispanic blacks
  
 Mexican Americans
  
  OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
GRS with carbohydrates
 0.95 (0.82-1.11)
 0.53
 1.1 (0.9-1.33)
 0.36
 0.93 (0.77-1.12)
 0.45
GRS with fiber 1.07 (0.99-1.16) 0.09 1.06 (0.96-1.18) 0.25 1.05 (0.96-1.15) 0.32
Open in a new tab

*Adjusted for age, sex, BMI, kcal/day, GRS, and nutrients.

Discussion

In this study, we investigated interactions of carbohydrate and fiber intakes with GWAS-identified genetic loci for T2D among three racial/ethnic groups in a representative sample of the US population. We examined possible interactions for both individual SNPs, as well as combinations of SNPs by calculating a GRS.

Overall, only one SNP of the 15 tested, rs7903146 in TCFL2, was associated with T2D in all three racial/ethnic groups. This is one of the strongest and most replicated loci associated with T2D. TCF7L2 gene variants have been associated with impaired pancreatic beta cell function [8]. While no other associations were significant across all three racial/ethnic groups, SLC30A8 rs13266634 was associated with T2D among both non-Hispanic whites and Mexican Americans. The SLC30A8 gene encodes a pancreatic islet-specific Zn transporter involved in insulin biosynthesis, maturation, and storage of pancreatic beta cells and is associated with decreased insulin secretion [9]. In addition, as expected [10,11], while most SNPs were not associated with T2D in any one racial/ethnic group, genetic risk scores calculated using all 15 previously-associated SNPs were associated with T2D for each racial/ethnic group. Some data are available on GRS and T2D risk in European-ancestry populations and results were similar to ours. In a large, nested case–control study of 2,809 T2D cases and 3,501 controls from the Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Nurses’ Health Study (all of European ancestry), the GRS was calculated with 10 SNPs in 9 loci. The odds ratio for T2D for each GRS point, corresponding to 1 risk allele, was 1.19 (95% CI, 1.14 -1.24) for men and 1.16 (CI, 1.12 to 1.20) for women. In a recent study involving an African American population, the trend of increase in risk for T2D with increasing risk allele load was similar to observations in European-ancestry populations [10].

We found suggestive evidence that genetic risk for T2D is modified by the dietary components carbohydrates and fiber. More specifically, we found that carbohydrate intake modified the association between six SNPs and T2D: CDKAL1 rs4712523 and FTO rs8050136 in non-Hispanic whites, IGFBP2 rs4402960 and THADA rs7578597 in non-Hispanic blacks, and NOTCH rs10923931 and TSPAN8-LGRS rs7961581 in Mexican Americans. Fiber modified the association between FTO rs8050136 in non-Hispanic whites, TSPAN8-LGRS rs7961581 in Mexican Americans, and CDKN2A/B rs10811661 in non-Hispanic blacks. No significant interaction term was observed consistently across all three racial/ethnic groups. However, the association between two other SNPs and T2D was modified by fiber intake in two racial/ethnic groups: ADAMTS9 rs4607103 in non-Hispanic whites and non-Hispanic blacks and THADA rs7578597 in non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans. As noted above, the directions of effect were consistent for ADAMTS9 rs4607103, but were in the opposite direction for THADA rs7578597. One possible explanation for the opposite direction of the interaction of this SNP with fiber in these two racial/ethnic groups could be that the SNP is tagging two different variants in each racial/ethnic group [12]. While these data suggest that carbohydrate and fiber intake may modify genotype-phenotype associations and that these associations may differ by race/ethnicity, further studies conducted with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm this finding.

Indeed, a major limitation of this study is sample size. While overall a large number of NHANES participants have available DNA samples (now >19,000 samples with the inclusion of NHANES 2007–2008), stratification by race/ethnicity and T2D status reduced the sample size for our analyses considerably. The stratification problem was further compounded in the gene-environment interaction analyses. Power calculations suggest that we did not have enough power to detect interactions between these variants and nutrient intakes. For example, we found an interaction for both carbohydrate intake and fiber intake with FTO rs8050136 among non-Hispanic whites. For the same SNP, we had sufficient power (at least 80%) to detect an interaction with carbohydrate or fiber intakes among Mexican Americans (MAF = 0.25) with an effect size of at least 1.25. For non-Hispanic blacks (MAF = 0.44), we had a smaller sample and sufficient power to detect an interaction with an effect size of at least of 1.30. These power calculations, however, may be inflated given that it is likely we did not directly genotype the causal or risk variants for non-Hispanic blacks and Mexican Americans.

Data on interactions of genes with carbohydrate or fiber intake and T2D risk are limited and most studies have examined interactions between variants in TCFL2 (the strongest T2D locus identified to date) and carbohydrate and fiber intakes among populations of European ancestry. In the Nurse’s Health Study, interactions between the TCFL2 (rs7903146) and glycemic load and glycemic index and the risk of T2D were found, although the risk of T2D associated with this variant did not significantly differ by cereal fiber or carbohydrate intake [4]. In the Malmo Diet and Cancer Study, interactions between TCFL2 (rs7903146) and dietary fiber intake were found, but no association between this SNP and carbohydrate intake and T2D risk was found [13]. Interactions between two other loci that were not part of our study with carbohydrate intake and the risk of T2D have been investigated in a European-ancestry population [14,15]. This study reported a significant interaction between a common genetic variant in the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor gene (GIPR), quintiles of carbohydrate intake (P = 0.0005), and incident type 2 diabetes [14] with a sex-specific interaction between a variant in the insulin receptor substrate 1 gene (rs2943641), intake of carbohydrates, and incident type 2 diabetes [15]. Interactions between wholegrain foods, a good source of fiber, and variants in this locus and the risk of T2D were found in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)-Potsdam cohort [16]. In a large meta-analysis of 14 cohorts of European populations, interactions between several GWAS polymorphisms associated with glucose, insulin, and wholegrain foods were investigated for interactions with fasting glucose and insulin. No interaction was found between the variant in TCFL2, wholegrain foods, and fasting glucose, although an interaction with wholegrain food intake and rs780094 (GCKR) for fasting insulin (P = 0.006) was found [17]. An interaction between carbohydrate intake and a common genetic variant (rs10423928) in the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor gene (GIPR), quintiles of carbohydrate intake (P = 0.0005), and incident T2D was observed in another study [14]. The SNP IRS1 rs2943641 also interacted with carbohydrate intake and incident T2D in a sex-specific fashion in the Malmo Diet and Cancer Cohort [15]. Similarly, data on interactions between the GRS and dietary factors with T2D are scarce [18].

In interpreting our findings, one should consider several limitations to this study. First, NHANES is a cross-sectional study and, therefore, we were unable to determine the temporal sequence of our results. As the number of factors under study increases, as with the addition of interaction terms, so do the number of strata. With a set sample size, increasing the number of terms in the model quickly increases the degrees of freedom and reduces the per-stratum sample size, thus decreasing statistical power. For this reason, even with the relatively large sample sizes in NHANES, we had to restrict our analyses to SNPs with minor allele frequencies >5%. After using the Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, none of the P values for the gene-nutrient interactions met the significance threshold. Although the Bonferroni method is very conservative, it is also easier to interpret. Correcting for multiple testing in gene-environment interaction studies is inherently more complicated than in standard single-SNP association studies.

While the power of the study was limited, a major strength of the study is the fact that we had dietary data available. Most GWAS studies do not have dietary data available and, thus, cannot investigate dietary modification of genetic risk factors and T2D. The differences in T2D between individuals and between populations may partly result from the interaction of genetic variants with dietary modifiers. Thus, understanding the mechanisms behind interactions between T2D-related genetic variants and environmental factors is of critical importance to determining the etiology of T2D.

Conclusion

Differences in T2D between individuals and between populations may partly result from interactions of known genetic variants with carbohydrate and fiber intake. The results presented here suggest that carbohydrate and fiber intake may modify the association between GWAS variants and T2D.

Methods

Study population

Study samples were drawn from three National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES III, NHANES 1999–2000, and NHANES 2001–2002) conducted by the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Participant ascertainment and data collection for NHANES have been previously described [19,20]. Race/ethnicity was self-described. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from height and weight measured in the Mobile Examination Center by CDC medical personnel. All procedures were approved by the CDC Ethics Review Board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Because no identifying information was accessed by the investigators, Vanderbilt University’s Institutional Review Board determined that this study met the criteria for a “non-human subjects” determination.

Dietary measurements

Data for dietary intake were collected via a 24-h dietary recall administered by a trained dietary interviewer. Total nutrient intake was calculated using the US Department of Agriculture’s survey nutrient database. To further reduce measurement error and to adjust for extraneous variation due to total energy intake, we applied the residual method described by Willett and Stampfer [21] for carbohydrate and fiber intake.

SNP selection and genotyping

A total of 15 SNPs were considered in this analysis (Additional file 1: Table S1). The SNPs included in the study are CDKN2A/B (rs10811661), NOTCH (rs10923931), HHEX-IDE (rs111875), CDC123/CAMK1D (rs12779790), SLC30A8 (rs13266634), PPARG (rs1801282), KCNQ1 (rs2237895), IGFBP2 (rs4402960), ADAMTS9 (rs4607103), CDKAL1 (rs4712523), THADA (rs7578597), TCFL2 (rs7903146), TSPAN8-LGRS (rs7961581), FTO (rs8050136), and JAZF1 (rs864745). All SNPs were previously associated with T2D (as of early 2009) in candidate gene and genome-wide association studies and were subsequently analyzed for single-SNP associations with T2D in a large meta-analysis by the PAGE study [22]. The 15 SNPs tested for gene–environment interactions were either accessed from existing data in the Genetic NHANES database or directly genotyped by EAGLE, one of the four large population-based studies of the PAGE I network, by using Sequenom or Illumina BeadXpress. In addition to genotyping experimental NHANES samples, we genotyped blinded duplicates provided by CDC and HapMap controls (n = 360). All EAGLE SNPs considered here were genotyped by all three NHANES studies (NHANES III, NHANES 1999–2000, and NHANES 2001–2002), had minor allele frequencies >5% in all three racial/ethnic populations, passed CDC quality control metrics, and are available for secondary analyses through NCHS/CDC.

Statistical analysis

All analyses were limited to adults (≥18 years) and stratified by self-reported race/ethnicity to minimize possible confounding due to population stratification. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression models with adjustment for age, sex, and BMI. The association between genotype and T2D risk was evaluated based on an additive genetic model and indexing exposure to the risk allele as reported in literature. Gene-environment interactions were modeled using a multiplicative interaction term between the environmental variable and the additively encoded SNP. All models were adjusted for the main effect of the SNP and the environmental variable, along with age, sex, kcal/day, and BMI. P values in figures and Additional file 1 are not corrected by multiple testing. However, we applied the Bonferroni correction [23] for multiple testing for single SNP analysis and for interaction analysis and if an association passed the correction we report the P value in bold.

Genetic risk score

We calculated the GRS using all 15 SNPs. We assumed an additive genetic model for each SNP and applied a linear weighting of 0, 1, or 2 to genotypes containing 0, 1, or 2 risk alleles, respectively. Multiplicative interactions between the GRS and carbohydrate intake or fiber intake were examined by including the interactive terms in the analysis, as well as the main effects. Interaction terms were coded as the product of the GRS and the nutrient under investigation.

All analyses were performed unweighted by using SAS v9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and the Analytic Data Research by Email (ANDRE) portal of the CDC Research Data Center in Hyattsville, MD. Data were plotted using Synthesis View [24].

Abbreviations

BMI: Body mass index; CDC: Centers for disease control and prevention; EAGLE: Epidemiologic architecture for genes linked to environment; GRS: Genetic risk score; GWAS: Genome-wide association studies; NCHS: National center for health statistics; NHANES: National health and nutrition examination surveys; PAGE: Population architecture using genomics and epidemiology; T2D: Type 2 diabetes.

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Authors’ contributions

RV drafted the manuscript and contributed to data analysis and interpretation. RG participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. DC conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. BM and JB contributed to conception and design and acquisition of data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Material

Additional file 1: Table S1

List of SNPs. Table S2. Associations between GWAS SNPs and T2D*. Table S3. Interaction between Carbohydrates and GWAS SNPS and T2D*. Table S4. Interaction between Fiber and GWAS SNPS and T2D*.

Click here for file (36.1KB, docx)

Contributor Information

Raquel Villegas, Email: raquel.villegas@vanderbilt.edu.

Robert J Goodloe, Email: robert.goodloe@gmail.com.

Bob E McClellan, Jr, Email: bob.mcclellan@vanderbilt.edu.

Jonathan Boston, Email: j.boston@vanderbilt.edu.

Dana C Crawford, Email: dana.c.crawford@vanderbilt.edu.

Acknowledgements

Genotyping for NHANES was supported in part by The Population Architecture Using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study, which is funded by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI). Data included in this report resulted from the Epidemiologic Architecture for Genes Linked to Environment (EAGLE) Study, as part of the NHGRI PAGE study (U01HG004798; PI: D. Crawford). EAGLE would like to thank Dr. Geraldine McQuillan and Jody McLean for their help in accessing the Genetic NHANES data. The Vanderbilt University Center for Human Genetics Research, Computational Genomics Core provided computational and/or analytical support for this work. The NHANES DNA samples are stored at and plated by the Vanderbilt DNA Resources Core. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institutes for Health or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Web resources

NHGRI GWAS Catalog (http://www.genome.gov/GWAStudies).

Genome Variation Server (pga.gs.washington.edu).

Synthesis-View (http://visualization.ritchielab.psu.edu/synthesis_views/plot).

References

  1. Morris AP, Voight BF, Teslovich TM, Ferreira T, Segre AV, Steinthorsdottir V, Strawbridge RJ, Khan H, Grallert H, Mahajan A, Prokopenko I, Kang HM, Dina C, Esko T, Fraser RM, Kanoni S, Kumar A, Lagou V, Langenberg C, Luan J, Lindgren CM, Muller-Nurasyid M, Pechlivanis S, Rayner NW, Scott LJ, Wiltshire S, Yengo L, Kinnunen L, Rossin EJ, Raychaudhuri S. et al. Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2012;44:981–990. doi: 10.1038/ng.2383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Florez JC. Newly identified loci highlight beta cell dysfunction as a key cause of type 2 diabetes: where are the insulin resistance genes? Diabetologia. 2008;51:1100–1110. doi: 10.1007/s00125-008-1025-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Dupuis J, Langenberg C, Prokopenko I, Saxena R, Soranzo N, Jackson AU, Wheeler E, Glazer NL, Bouatia-Naji N, Gloyn AL, Lindgren CM, Magi R, Morris AP, Randall J, Johnson T, Elliott P, Rybin D, Thorleifsson G, Steinthorsdottir V, Henneman P, Grallert H, Dehghan A, Hottenga JJ, Franklin CS, Navarro P, Song K, Goel A, Perry JR, Egan JM, Lajunen T. et al. New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk. Nat Genet. 2010;42:105–116. doi: 10.1038/ng.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cornelis MC, Qi L, Zhang C, Kraft P, Manson J, Cai T, Hunter DJ, Hu FB. Joint effects of common genetic variants on the risk for type 2 diabetes in U.S. men and women of European ancestry. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:541–550. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Meyer KA, Kushi LH, Jacobs DR Jr, Slavin J, Sellers TA, Folsom AR. Carbohydrates, dietary fiber, and incident type 2 diabetes in older women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;71:921–930. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.4.921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Wannamethee SG, Whincup PH, Thomas MC, Sattar N. Associations between dietary fiber and inflammation, hepatic function, and risk of type 2 diabetes in older men: potential mechanisms for the benefits of fiber on diabetes risk. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:1823–1825. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Matise TC, Ambite JL, Buyske S, Carlson CS, Cole SA, Crawford DC, Haiman CA, Heiss G, Kooperberg C, Marchand LL, Manolio TA, North KE, Peters U, Ritchie MD, Hindorff LA, Haines JL. The Next PAGE in understanding complex traits: design for the analysis of Population Architecture Using Genetics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;174:849–859. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Florez JC, Jablonski KA, Bayley N, Pollin TI, de Bakker PI, Shuldiner AR, Knowler WC, Nathan DM, Altshuler D. TCF7L2 polymorphisms and progression to diabetes in the Diabetes Prevention Program. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:241–250. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa062418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Steinthorsdottir V, Thorleifsson G, Reynisdottir I, Benediktsson R, Jonsdottir T, Walters GB, Styrkarsdottir U, Gretarsdottir S, Emilsson V, Ghosh S, Baker A, Snorradottir S, Bjarnason H, Ng MC, Hansen T, Bagger Y, Wilensky RL, Reilly MP, Adeyemo A, Chen Y, Zhou J, Gudnason V, Chen G, Huang H, Lashley K, Doumatey A, So WY, Ma RC, Andersen G, Borch-Johnsen K. et al. A variant in CDKAL1 influences insulin response and risk of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2007;39:770–775. doi: 10.1038/ng2043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cooke JN, Ng MC, Palmer ND, An SS, Hester JM, Freedman BI, Langefeld CD, Bowden DW. Genetic risk assessment of type 2 diabetes-associated polymorphisms in African Americans. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:287–292. doi: 10.2337/dc11-0957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hivert MF, Jablonski KA, Perreault L, Saxena R, McAteer JB, Franks PW, Hamman RF, Kahn SE, Haffner S, Meigs JB, Altshuler D, Knowler WC, Florez JC. Updated genetic score based on 34 confirmed type 2 diabetes Loci is associated with diabetes incidence and regression to normoglycemia in the diabetes prevention program. Diabetes. 2011;60:1340–1348. doi: 10.2337/db10-1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rosenberg NA, Huang L, Jewett EM, Szpiech ZA, Jankovic I, Boehnke M. Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations. Nat Rev Genet. 2010;11:356–366. doi: 10.1038/nrg2760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hindy G, Sonestedt E, Ericson U, Jing XJ, Zhou Y, Hansson O, Renstrom E, Wirfalt E, Orho-Melander M. Role of TCF7L2 risk variant and dietary fibre intake on incident type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2012;55:2646–2654. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2634-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sonestedt E, Lyssenko V, Ericson U, Gullberg B, Wirfalt E, Groop L, Orho-Melander M. Genetic variation in the glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor modifies the association between carbohydrate and fat intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in the Malmo Diet and Cancer cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:E810–E818. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-2444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Ericson U, Rukh G, Stojkovic I, Sonestedt E, Gullberg B, Wirfalt E, Wallstrom P, Orho-Melander M. Sex-specific interactions between the IRS1 polymorphism and intakes of carbohydrates and fat on incident type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013;97:208–216. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.046474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fisher E, Boeing H, Fritsche A, Doering F, Joost HG, Schulze MB. Whole-grain consumption and transcription factor-7-like 2 ( TCF7L2) rs7903146: gene-diet interaction in modulating type 2 diabetes risk. Br J Nutr. 2009;101:478–481. doi: 10.1017/S0007114508020369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nettleton JA, McKeown NM, Kanoni S, Lemaitre RN, Hivert MF, Ngwa J, van Rooij FJ, Sonestedt E, Wojczynski MK, Ye Z, Tanaka T, Garcia M, Anderson JS, Follis JL, Djousse L, Mukamal K, Papoutsakis C, Mozaffarian D, Zillikens MC, Bandinelli S, Bennett AJ, Borecki IB, Feitosa MF, Ferrucci L, Forouhi NG, Groves CJ, Hallmans G, Harris T, Hofman A, Houston DK. et al. Interactions of dietary whole-grain intake with fasting glucose- and insulin-related genetic loci in individuals of European descent: a meta-analysis of 14 cohort studies. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2684–2691. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Qi L, Cornelis MC, Zhang C, van Dam RM, Hu FB. Genetic predisposition, Western dietary pattern, and the risk of type 2 diabetes in men. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;89:1453–1458. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.27249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-94. Hyattsville, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1996. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/nh3data.htm. 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) DNA samples: guidelines for proposals to use samples and cost schedule. Fed Reg. 2010. Fed Reg 75:32191-32195. 2012.
  21. Willet W, Stampfer M. In: Nutritional Epidemiology, Volume 30. 2. Willet W, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998. Implications of total energy intake for epidemiological analysis; pp. 273–301. [Google Scholar]
  22. Haiman CA, Fesinmeyer MD, Spencer KL, Buzkova P, Voruganti VS, Wan P, Haessler J, Franceschini N, Monroe KR, Howard BV, Jackson RD, Florez JC, Kolonel LN, Buyske S, Goodloe RJ, Liu S, Manson JE, Meigs JB, Waters K, Mukamal KJ, Pendergrass SA, Shrader P, Wilkens LR, Hindorff LA, Ambite JL, North KE, Peters U, Crawford DC, Le ML, Pankow JS. Consistent directions of effect for established type 2 diabetes risk variants across populations: the population architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) Consortium. Diabetes. 2012;61:1642–1647. doi: 10.2337/db11-1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ. 1995;310:170. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Pendergrass SA, Dudek SM, Crawford DC, Ritchie MD. Synthesis-view: visualization and interpretation of SNP association results for multi-cohort, multi-phenotype data and meta-analysis. BioData Min. 2010;3:10. doi: 10.1186/1756-0381-3-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Additional file 1: Table S1

List of SNPs. Table S2. Associations between GWAS SNPs and T2D*. Table S3. Interaction between Carbohydrates and GWAS SNPS and T2D*. Table S4. Interaction between Fiber and GWAS SNPS and T2D*.

Click here for file (36.1KB, docx)

Articles from BMC Genetics are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES