Skip to main content
Critical Care logoLink to Critical Care
. 2014 Jul 1;18(4):R138. doi: 10.1186/cc13961

Comparisons between intragastric and small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Adam M Deane 1,2,, Rupinder Dhaliwal 3, Andrew G Day 3, Emma J Ridley 4, Andrew R Davies 4, Daren K Heyland 3
PMCID: PMC4095677  PMID: 25320746

After publication of this article [1], the authors noticed that their names were listed incorrectly as M Deane Adam, Dhaliwal Rupinder, G Day Andrew, J Ridley Emma, R Davies Andrew and K Heyland Daren. The author names should be written as Adam M Deane, Rupinder Dhaliwal, Andrew G Day, Emma J Ridley, Andrew R Davies and Daren K Heyland.

See related research by Deane et al., http://ccforum.com/content/17/3/R125

Contributor Information

Adam M Deane, Email: adam.deane@adelaide.edu.au.

Rupinder Dhaliwal, Email: dhaliwar@kgh.kari.net.

Andrew G Day, Email: daya@kgh.kari.net.

Emma J Ridley, Email: emma.ridley@monash.edu.

Andrew R Davies, Email: daviesandrewr@gmail.com.

Daren K Heyland, Email: dkh2@queensu.ca.

References

  1. Adam MD, Rupinder D, Andrew GD, Emma JR, Andrew RD, Daren KH. Comparisons between intragastric and small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17:R125. doi: 10.1186/cc12800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Critical Care are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES