Abstract
Background
Adenosine deaminase (ADA) activity has been discovered in several inflammatory conditions; however, there are no data associated with cutaneous anthrax. The aim of this study was to investigate serum ADA activity in patients with cutaneous anthrax.
Material/Methods
Sixteen patients with cutaneous anthrax and 17 healthy controls were enrolled. We measured ADA activity; peripheral blood leukocyte, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte counts; erythrocyte sedimentation rate; and C reactive protein levels.
Results
Serum ADA activity was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous anthrax than in the controls (p<0.001). A positive correlation was observed between ADA activity and lymphocyte counts (r=0.589, p=0.021) in the patient group.
Conclusions
This study suggests that serum ADA could be used as a biochemical marker in cutaneous anthrax.
MeSH Keywords: Adenosine Deaminase – diagnostic use, Anthrax – diagnosis, Diagnosis
Background
Anthrax is a rare, potentially fatal zoonotic disease caused by the bacterium Bacillus anthracis, which can infect both animals and humans [1]. Infection via inhalation of Bacillus anthracis spores can result in a mortality rate of up to 96% [2]. Major routes of exposure and subsequent infection have been confirmed through skin contact with, or the inhalation or ingestion of, Bacillus anthracis spores [3]. Although West Africa has the highest incidence in the world [4], anthrax is also a significant problem in Central America, Romania, Greece, and Turkey [4–6].
Cutaneous anthrax, the most common form of the disease, accounts for 95% of anthrax cases [7]. It is acquired when spores enter through a cut or abrasion in the skin. The most common areas of exposure are the hands, arms, face, and neck [8]. Diagnosis may have to be on a clinical basis in the majority of patients. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax can be difficult, particularly in endemic regions, because of its variable clinical phenotype.
Adenosine deaminase (ADA), an enzyme present in red blood cells and blood vessel walls, catalyzes the irreversible hydrolytic deamination of adenosine to inosine and 2′-deoxyadenosine to 2′-deoxyinosine. Inosine and 2′-deoxyinosine are converted to hypoxanthine, xanthine and, finally, to uric acid [9]. This enzyme is considered a suitable biochemical marker of cell-mediated immunity [10]. ADA has been accepted as an important enzyme in the proliferation and differentiation of T-lymphocytes, as well as for the maturation and function of blood monocytes and macrophages [11]. Its levels are 10 times higher in T-lymphocytes than in erythrocytes, and it is frequently considered a noninvasive diagnostic test for tuberculosis, with 90–100% sensitivity and 89–100% specificity [12].
The aim of this study was to investigate serum ADA activity and other inflammatory markers in patients diagnosed with cutaneous anthrax in the Van region of Turkey, where the disease is prevalent.
Material and Methods
All patients (5 males and 11 females) were diagnosed with cutaneous anthrax at outpatient clinics of the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (Medical Faculty, Yuzuncu Yıl University, Van, Turkey) in a 2-month period (1 November–31 December 2013) and 17 healthy controls (11 males and 6 females) were without a history of chronic or recurrent disease and had normal physical examination results.
All of the cutaneous anthrax cases were characterized by evolving skin lesions and had a history of animal contact. The diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax was based on dermatologic findings, including papules from the vesicular stage; pruritic ulcers covered by characteristic black eschar; and edema, erythema, or necrosis without ulceration. Cases were confirmed by a positive smear or by isolation of Bacillus anthracis in clinical specimens [13]. Bacillus anthracis isolates were identified on the basis of conventional methods, such as gram-positive bacilli with spores present in the smear, the presence of a capsule, the lack of motility, or catalase positivity.
The study protocol was approved by the local ethics committee. All subjects were informed about the study and written consent was obtained from each subject.
Exclusion criteria
The exclusion criteria included a history of alcohol abuse, habitual smoking, intravenous drug abuse, pregnancy, antioxidant supplement use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, liver or renal disease, rheumatoid arthritis, pulmonary disease, and coronary artery disease.
Blood samples
Blood samples were collected in tubes at 8:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. after an overnight fasting period and were immediately stored at 4°C. Peripheral blood leukocyte, lymphocyte, neutrophil and monocyte counts, and erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR) were measured. The serum was then separated from the cells by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 10 min, and C reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured. The serum samples were stored in plastic tubes at –80°C and used to analyze ADA activity.
Measurement of serum adenosine deaminase activity
Serum ADA activity was measured with an enzymatic spectrophotometric method determined by Giusti and Galanti, which is based on the direct measurement of ammonia formation, a byproduct that forms when ADA is in the presence of excess adenosine [14]. The results are expressed as units per liter (U/L).
Other parameters
The serum CRP levels were determined by using commercially available assay kits (Roche®, Mannheim, Germany) with an autoanalyzer (Roche®/Hitachi modular P-800, Mannheim, Germany).
Complete blood counts were performed using a Celdyne 3700 Hematology Analyser (Abbott®).
ESR was measured using an automated chemiluminescence autoanalyzer (Roche®).
Statistical analysis
The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Parameter comparisons of patients and healthy controls were performed using Student’s t-test. Correlation analyses were performed using Pearson’s correlation test. The results were considered to be statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.
Results
The demographic characteristics of the patients with cutaneous anthrax and the controls are shown in Table 1. There were no significant differences between the groups with respect to age and sex (p>0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1.
Laboratory findings and demographic characteristics of the two groups*.
| Parameters | Patients (n=16) | Controls (n=17) | p |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 44±6 | 41±3 | 0.211 |
| Sex (female/male) | 5/11 | 6/11 | 0.805 |
| Leukocyte counts (mm3/ml) | 8.8±2.3 | 7.2±1.8 | 0.037 |
| Lymphocyte counts (mm3/ml) | 1.9±0.8 | 1.5±0.5 | 0.099 |
| Neutrophil counts (mm3/ml) | 6.1±2.5 | 4.7±1.6 | 0.070 |
| Monocyte counts (mm3/ml) | 0.6±0.2 | 0.5±0.2 | 0.987 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 31.9±15.5 | 12.5±4.6 | 0.001 |
| CRP (mg/dl) | 29.7±17.5 | 3.2±1.5 | 0.001 |
| ADA (U/L) | 31.9±1.6 | 17.5±1.4 | 0.001 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation.
ESR – erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP – C reactive protein; ADA – adenosine deaminase.
Blood leukocyte counts were significantly higher in the patients with cutaneous anthrax compared with the controls (p=0.037). Although lymphocyte and neutrophil counts were higher in the patient group, there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05). ESR and CRP levels were significantly higher in the patients with cutaneous anthrax compared with the controls (p<0.001) (Table 1).
Serum ADA activity was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous anthrax than in the control subjects (p<0.001) (Table 1).
A positive correlation was observed between ADA activity and lymphocyte counts (r=0.589, p=0.021); however, there was no correlation between ADA and the other inflammatory markers investigated (p>0.05).
Discussion
We evaluated the serum ADA activity in patients with cutaneous anthrax. In the diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax, the clinical presentation of the disease and a history of close contact with sick animals are very important. If a patient has a typical malignant pustule or malignant edema and has had a history of contact with animals, the diagnosis may be easy. The clinical laboratory diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax is generally established by conventional microbiological methods, such as bacterial cultures and directly gram staining smears of clinical specimens [15]. However, the clinical presentation could be atypical and the patient’s recollection of contact with animals may not be accurate, or the patient may neglect to supply this information. In these situations, the diagnosis of cutaneous anthrax might be difficult. PCR, immunohistochemistry, laboratory parameters (e.g., CRP, ESR, and white blood cell [WBC]), and anthracin skin tests may be helpful in the diagnosis of anthrax [16,17].
Inflammatory markers such as ESR and WBC count were found to be high in some patients [18]. However, the elevation of CRP levels in patients with cutaneous anthrax, as we found, has not been reported previously.
ADA is a key enzyme in purine metabolism; it converts adenosine and deoxyadenosine to inosine and deoxyinosine by irreversible deamination [19]. ADA is widely distributed in human tissues (its highest activity being in lymphoid tissues), and it is primarily associated with T-lymphocyte proliferation [20]. Although ADA has been considered a nonspecific marker of T-cell activation, the precise mechanisms by which serum ADA activity is altered have not been clearly identified [21].
High levels of serum ADA have been reported in infectious diseases such as viral and bacterial pneumonia, HIV infection, extra-pulmonary and pulmonary tuberculosis, H. pylori, acute appendicitis, visceral leishmaniasis, and mononucleosis [11,12,22,23] and might have diagnostic value. Moreover, circulating levels of ADA have been shown to increase in several inflammatory conditions, including Behçet’s disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and certain malignancies, especially those of hematopoietic origin [24–34].
Conclusions
Although to our knowledge this is the first study to investigate serum ADA enzyme activity in patients with cutaneous anthrax, it has a major limitation. Our study design did not allow us to investigate whether ADA activity is uniquely associated with cutaneous anthrax. Ideally, a third group of sick patients, with elevated CRP or ESR, but without lymphocytes or ADA levels, could have been included to highlight the issue. However, in the current study, we observed that serum ADA enzyme activity was significantly higher in patients with cutaneous anthrax than in the healthy controls. Moreover, we found that acute cutaneous anthrax patients had increased WBC, CRP levels, and ESR compared with the control group. These results suggest that ADA contributes to the inflammation seen in cutaneous anthrax and might be used in the clinical setting.
Footnotes
Source of support: Departmental sources
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflict of interest regarding this work.
References
- 1.Kim SH, Kim SK, Jung KH, et al. Proteomic analysis of the oxidative stress response induced by low-dose hydrogen peroxide in Bacillus anthracis. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23:750–58. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1209.09070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Holty JE, Bravata DM, Liu H, et al. Systematic review: a century of inhalational anthrax cases from 1900 to 2005. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144:270–80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-4-200602210-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kolsto AB, Tourasse NJ, Okstad OA. What sets Bacillus anthracis apart from other Bacillus species? Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:451–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hugh-Jones M. 1996–97 Global Anthrax Report. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;87:189–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.1999.00867.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schmid G, Kaufmann A. Anthrax in Europe: its epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and role in bioterrorism. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2002;8:479–88. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2002.00500.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Inglesby TV, O’Toole T, Henderson DA, et al. Anthrax as a biological weapon 2002: updated recommendations for management. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;287:2236–52. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.17.2236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Human anthrax associated with an epizootic among livestock-North Dakota, 2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:677–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Shieh WJ, Guarner J, Paddock C, et al. The critical role of pathology in the investigation of bioterrorism-related cutaneous anthrax. Am J Pathol. 2003;163:1901–10. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63548-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoshino T, Yamada K, Masuoka K, et al. Elevated adenosine deaminase activity in the serum of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1994;25:97–102. doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(94)90034-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sullivan JL, Oxborne WRA, Wedgewood RJ. Adenosine deaminase activity in lymphocytes. Br J Haematol. 1977;37:157–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Adams A, Harkness RA. Adenosine deaminase activity in thymus and other human tissues. Clin Exp Immunol. 1976;26:647–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gupta BK, Bharat V, Bandyopadhyay D. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values of adenosine deaminase in patients of tubercular and non-tubercular serosal effusion. India J Clin Med Res. 2010;2(3):121–26. doi: 10.4021/jocmr2010.05.289w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Investigation of anthrax associated with intentional exposure and interim public health guidelines, October, 2001. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2001;50:889–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Guisti G, Galanti B. Adenosine deaminase: colorimetric method. In: Bergmeyer HU, editor. Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. 5th ed. Weinheim (Germany): Verlag Chemie; 1984. pp. 315–23. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shlyakhov E, Rubinstein E. Evaluation of the anthraxin skin test for diagnosis of acute and past human anthrax. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15:242–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01591362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tatti KM, Greer P, White E, et al. Morphologic, immunologic, and molecular methods to detect Bacillus anthracis in formalin-fixed tissues. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morph. 2006;14:234–43. doi: 10.1097/01.pai.0000178390.39047.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shlyakhov E, Rubinstein E. Evaluation of the anthraxin skin test for diagnosis of acute and past human anthrax. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1996;15:242–45. doi: 10.1007/BF01591362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Oncul O, Ozsoy MF, Gul HC, et al. Cutaneous anthrax in Turkey: a review of 32 cases. Scand J Infect Dis. 2002;34:413–16. doi: 10.1080/00365540110080610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yuksel H, Akoflu TF. Serum and synovial Xuid adenosine deaminase activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and reactive arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1988;47:492–95. doi: 10.1136/ard.47.6.492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tritsch GL, Minowada J. Differences in purine metabolizing enzyme activities in human leukemia T-cell, B-cell and null cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1978;60:1301–4. doi: 10.1093/jnci/60.6.1301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fischer D, Van der Weyden MB, Snyderman R, Kelley WN. A role for adenosine deaminase in human monocyte maturation. J Clin Invest. 1976;58:399–407. doi: 10.1172/JCI108484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bulbuloglu E, Inanc F, Bakaris S, et al. Association of adenosine deaminase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase activities with Helicobacter pylori. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(12):2296–99. doi: 10.1007/s10620-005-3050-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Tripathi K, Kumar R, Bharti K, et al. Adenosine deaminase activity in sera of patients with visceral leishmaniasis in India. Clin Chim Acta. 2008;388:135–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2007.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hitoglou S, Hatzistilianou M, Gougoustamou D, et al. Adenosine deaminase activity and its isoenzyme pattern in patients with juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(6):411–16. doi: 10.1007/s100670170005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Canpolat F, Unver M, Eskioğlu F, et al. Serum and erythrocyte adenosine deaminase activities in patients with Behçet’s disease. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45(9):1053–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2006.02892.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Meunier P, Filipe P, Emerit I, et al. Adenosine deaminase in progressive systemic sclerosis. Acta Dermatol Venerol. 1995;75:297–99. doi: 10.2340/0001555575297299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sari RA, Taysi S, Yilmaz O, et al. Correlation of serum levels of adenosine deaminase activity and its isoenzymes with disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21(1):87–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Hofbrand AV, Janossy G. Enzyme and membrane markers in leukemia: recent developments. J Clin Pathol. 1981;34:254–62. doi: 10.1136/jcp.34.3.254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gierek T, Drada M, Pilch J, et al. Adenosine deaminase and purinephosphorylase activities in lymphocytes and red blood cells of patients with carcinoma of the larynx. Auris Nasus Larynx. 1987;14:97–100. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(87)80027-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raczynska J, Jonas S, Krawczinski J. Diagnostic value of adenosine in some liver diseases. Clin Chem Acta. 1996;13:151–54. doi: 10.1016/0009-8981(66)90288-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gocmen E, Tez M, Ozturk S, et al. Activities of adenosine deaminase and 5′-nucleotidase in cancereous and non-cancereous human gastric tissues. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2009;110:416–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ketavarapu S, Ramani GU, Modi P. A study on the serum adenosine deaminase activity in patients with typhoid Fever and other febrile illnesses. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(4):613–17. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4761.2865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nigam PK, Srivastava P, Patra PK. Serum adenosine deaminase levels in reactional and non-reactional leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2005;71:20–22. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.13780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Erer B, Yilmaz G, Yilmaz FM, et al. Assessment of adenosine deaminase levels in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving anti-TNF-alpha therapy. Rheumatol Int. 2009;29:651–54. doi: 10.1007/s00296-008-0750-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
