Abstract
Background:
It has previously been demonstrated that there is a significant drop in all domains of quality of life among interns during internship.
Aims:
A modified version of the health consultant's job stress and satisfaction questionnaire (HCJSSQ) was used to assess and quantify aspects of internship that were perceived as stressful and satisfying. Methods used to cope with work place stress were explored.
Settings and Design:
A prospective cohort study was undertaken among 93 medical interns doing a rotating internship at the Christian Medical College and Hospital, a tertiary-care hospital in southern India.
Materials and Methods:
After completion of 6 months of internship, the modified version of the HCJSSQ was administered to all participants.
Statistical Analysis:
The data were entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 9 by double data entry technique. Percentages of interns reporting high levels of stress, satisfaction were calculated.
Results:
While 63.4% of interns reported high levels of satisfaction, 45.2% of the interns experienced high levels of stress, 17.6% coped with work stress by using alcohol and nicotine, and 37% coped through unhealthy eating habits.
Conclusion:
More people found internship satisfying than stressful. However, a high proportion found it stressful, and many reported unhealthy coping mechanisms.
Keywords: Coping methods, job stress, medical interns, satisfaction
INTRODUCTION
Internship in India refers to the year after the undergraduate medical course and includes compulsory rotations in medicine, surgery, obstetrics, gynaecology, and community medicine. It has previously been described that the quality of life among interns in India declines during internship.[1] This decline in the quality of life may be explained in part by increased responsibility and work load thereby causing workplace stress. This paper seeks to explore the prevalence of job-related stress, satisfaction, and the methods used by interns to cope with job stress.
To our knowledge, this is the first paper from India to explore factors contributing to internship being considered stressful or satisfying. Coping strategies among interns have not previously been reported.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This is a prospective cohort study of all doctors doing their 1-year rotating internship at the Christian Medical College, from October 2010 to September 2011.
Of 104 recruited candidates, 7 dropped out of the internship program and 4 had taken prolonged leave. Ninety three interns provided data for this study.
Details about the recruitment of the cohort and initial evaluations have previously been described.[1] The nature of the study was explained to the interns and written informed consent was obtained. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Six months after beginning internship, all the participants were asked to fill up the modified Health Consultant's Job Stress and Satisfaction questionnaire (HCJSSQ -modified 1994 version).[2] This has two sections:
Factors contributing to job stress and overall job stress: A list of 21 specific sources of stress is rated on a Likert scale of 0-3.
Factors contributing to job satisfaction and overall job satisfaction: A list of 13 specific sources of stress is rated on a Likert scale of 0-3.
The respondents were also asked to rate their overall job stress and satisfaction on a Likert scale of 0-3.
Several methods of coping with stress at work were enumerated and the respondents were requested to indicate how often they adopted the same on an ascending scale of 0-3.
Some items in the original questionnaire not considered relevant to interns were omitted or modified [Table 1].
Table 1.
Modifications made to health consultant's job stress and satisfaction questionnaire (HCJSSQ)
Responses of 0 and 1 corresponded to ‘not at all’ and ‘little’ respectively and were grouped together for the purposes of analysis. Responses of 2 and 3 corresponded to ‘quite a bit’ and ‘a lot’ and were grouped together.
The data were entered into Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 9 by double data entry technique. The percent of individuals responding 0 or 1 and 2 or 3 were computed.
RESULTS
Job stress
Among the 93 participants 42 of the respondents (45.8%) perceived their work stress to be high or very high [Table 2].
Table 2.
Stress among interns after 6 months of internship
Job satisfaction
63.4% of the respondents reported being happy or very happy with their job [Table 3].
Table 3.
Satisfaction among interns after 6 months of internship
Factors contributing to job stress
Disruption of home life through spending long hours at work was the source of stress in 65.6% respondents, followed by having too great an overall volume of work (49.5%) and being responsible for the quality of work of others (47.3%) [Table 4].
Table 4.
Prevalence of factors that contribute to a large extent to job stress
Factors contributing to job satisfaction
Having good relations with other staff members was satisfying for 82.8% of the respondents, followed by putting clinical skills to good use (78.5%), having variety in one's tasks (78.5%) and being perceived by colleagues as doing a good job (76.3%) [Table 5].
Table 5.
Prevalence of factors contributing to a large extent to job satisfaction
Methods of coping with job stress
Most respondents chose to cope with job stress through conversations with colleagues and friends/family (61.5% and 69.2%, respectively). A large percentage coped through working longer hours (50%) and through unhealthy eating habits (37%). The use of alcohol (13.2%) and nicotine (4.4%) was also reported as a coping strategy [Table 6].
Table 6.
Prevalence of methods of coping with stress
DISCUSSION
Despite demonstrating a decline in the quality of life within the same cohort, and despite high levels of perceived stress we note that most interns find their jobs highly satisfying.[1]
While it may be argued that stress is a natural part of the process of learning and skill acquisition and helps interns grow into mature, confident doctors — high levels of stress are a matter of concern as stress not only reduces attention and concentration thereby impairing judgement capacity; it also impedes formation of a therapeutic alliance between physician and patient.[3,4]
An overwhelming majority feel that disruption of the work life balance caused by spending long hours at work as well as a large volume of work were the major causes of stress. This is consistent with reports from interns overseas.[5] Unlike interns overseas inadequate financial remuneration was not a major stressor.[3]
Interns in our study derived satisfaction from good interpersonal relations — with colleagues, patients, and other staff. A sense of fulfilment arising from adequate utilization of training and skills contributed greatly to their job satisfaction. This is in keeping with findings from overseas.[6]
Consistent with studies overseas interns derived maximal support from their peers and family.[5]
However, only 26.4% reported pursuing hobbies and 22% reported exercising or playing sport as a means of tackling stress when compared to 88% among residents overseas.[5]
The prevalence of alcohol use as a coping measure was 13.2% which is substantially higher than those reported from consultant anaesthesiologists in India (2.5% and 2% for alcohol and drugs, respectively) as well as that reported from residents overseas (5% and 1% for alcohol and smoking, respectively).[5,7]
These are worrisome findings and should prompt action to education of interns on appropriate adaptive strategies to cope with stress.
Limitations
While it was emphasized to the respondents that they describe their experience during the past 4 weeks, interpersonal variations in experiences and frame of mind at the time of data collection might have clouded the assessment. While this study describes the experience of interns at a single centre in the south of India — we believe that, owing to a common structure of the internship program our experiences will be similar though not identical to centres elsewhere.
Footnotes
Source of Support: Nil
Conflict of Interest: None declared.
REFERENCES
- 1.Susmita C, Edwin N, Braganza D. Quality of life among medical interns in a South Indian tertiary hospital. Natl Med J India. 2013 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Teasdale E, Drew S, Taylor C, Ramirez A. Cancer Research UK London Psychosocial Group; 2008. Hospital Consultants’ Job Stress and Satisfaction Questionnaire (HCJSSQ)-User Manual; pp. 10–13. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Levey RE. Sources of stress for residents and recommendations for programs toassist them. AcadMed. 2001;76:142–50. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200102000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shapiro SL, Shapiro DE, Schwartz GE. Stress management in medical education: A review of the literature. Acad Med. 2000;75:748–59. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200007000-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lam TP, Wong JG, Ip MS, Lam KF, Pang SL. Psychological well-being of interns in Hong Kong: What causes them stress and what helps them. Med Teach. 2010;32:e120–6. doi: 10.3109/01421590903449894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ajiboye PO, Yussuf AD. Psychological morbidity and job satisfaction amongst medical interns at a Nigerian teaching hospital. Afr J Psychiatry(Johannesbg) 2009;12:303–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shidhaye R, Divekar D, Dhulkhed V, Goel G, Gupta A, Shidhaye R. Evaluation of stressors and coping strategies for stress in Indian anaesthesiologists. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55:193–8. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]