Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 May 3;23(7):1195–1203. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1330

Exposure to infections and Risk of Leukemia in Young Children

Infection and Childhood Leukemia

Erin L Marcotte 1, Beate Ritz 2, Myles Cockburn 3, Fei Yu 4, Julia E Heck 2
PMCID: PMC4100471  NIHMSID: NIHMS593206  PMID: 24793957

Abstract

Background

Epidemiologic studies indicate that infections in early childhood may protect against pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

Methods

We identified 3,402 ALL cases among children 0–5 years using the California Cancer Registry. From California birth records we randomly selected controls in a 20:1 ratio and frequency matched them to cases by birth year. We investigated markers of exposure to infections, including month of birth, timing of birth in relation to influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons, and birth order based on data from California birth certificates and national infection surveillance systems.

Results

We observed an increased risk of ALL for spring and summer births, and for those first exposed to an influenza or RSV season at nine to twelve months of age compared to those exposed during the first three months of life, and this association was stronger among first born children (OR and 95% CI 1.44 [1.13, 1.82] for influenza exposure at nine to twelve months of age). Decreased risk was observed with increasing birth order among non-Hispanic whites but not Hispanics (OR and 95% CI 0.76 [0.59, 096] for fourth or higher birth order among whites).

Conclusion

Our results support the hypothesis that infections in early childhood decrease risk of ALL.

Impact

Our findings implicate early life exposure to infections as protective factors for ALL in young children.

MeSH keywords: Children, Epidemiology, Infant, Influenza, Human, Leukemia, Lymphoid, Respiratory Syncytial Virus

INTRODUCTION

Leukemia is the most common form of childhood cancer, accounting for more than one third of all childhood cancers among those aged 0–14.(1)

Pediatric leukemia arises from a diverse set of chromosomal and molecular changes. There is strong evidence that most of these are acquired, not inherited, as only a small number (about 5%) of leukemias are associated with inherited genetic syndromes. (2, 3) Evidence from twin studies and studies of neonatal blood spots suggests that most initiating events occur during fetal development in utero. (48) Infections may play a role in pediatric leukemia pathogenesis, (913) and there are two main hypotheses on the nature of this etiology.

Greaves has proposed the ‘delayed infection’ hypothesis suggesting that delayed exposure to common childhood infections leads to an increased risk of pediatric leukemia through an abnormal immune response.(14) Greaves hypothesized that lack of immune modulation in the neonatal period and in infancy may predispose the immune system to abnormal responses following subsequent ‘delayed’ exposure to infection. Within the context of the ‘two hit hypothesis’, a minimum of two etiologic events are required for the development of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and infection would promote the second genetic event through an aberrant or pathological immune response. A second hypothesis has been proposed by Kinlen as the ‘population mixing’ hypothesis which states that pediatric leukemia might arise from a rare response to common infection. (15) Population mixing would result in increased risks due to contact between infected and susceptible individuals. While Greaves’ hypothesis emphasizes the timing of exposure, Kinlen’s hypothesis emphasizes exposure to specific agent(s) the child has not encountered yet.

Since direct measurement of a child’s actual exposure to infection is challenging in a large scale epidemiologic setting, previous studies have employed several proxies of early life exposure to infections in order to examine the link between childhood cancers and infection. Well accepted as predictors of increased early childhood exposure to infection are day care attendance, number of older siblings, and timing of birth with regard to common viral infection seasons.(16, 17) Here we examine the link between risk of ALL and several proxies for early life exposure to infection, including month of birth, timing of birth with regard to influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) seasons, and birth order among California children age 0–5.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects

Using data from the California Cancer Registry, we identified all acute lymphoid leukemia (ALL) tumor cases diagnosed in California between 1988–2007 among children 0–5 years of age at diagnosis. Leukemia cases were defined as International Classification of Childhood Cancer, Third edition (ICCC-3) (18) code 011 (Lymphoid leukemias). Cases were part of a large case-control study of all childhood cancers ages 0–5 in CA during this period, in which we successfully matched 89% of all cases to their CA birth certificate (birth years 1986–2007).(19) From the same birth certificate files, we randomly selected twenty controls free of cancer by age 5 for each case, frequency matched on birth year. We cross-checked CA death records and excluded from eligible controls those who died before age six. We also excluded improbable or likely non-viable births, defined as birth weight of < 500 grams or birth before 20 weeks of gestation The final ALL dataset included 3402 ALL cases and 68,040 controls.

Since our study was based only on existing records, we did not obtain informed consent from study subjects. Our use of human subject data was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board and the California Health and Human Services Agency Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects.

Statistical Methods

Month of birth information was collected from birth certificate data. We expect that month of birth may be associated with exposure to seasonal infections. Specifically, examples of seasonal infections and the timing of their peak include: winter months: influenza, pneumococcal disease, and rotavirus; spring: respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and measles; summer: poliovirus and other enteroviruses; and fall: parainfluenza virus type 1. (20)

Since the timing of community infections varies from year to year, we retrieved information on influenza and RSV seasons utilizing surveillance reports from the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) and California Department of Public Health Influenza Surveillance Program. (21, 22) We chose these two infections of interest since detailed surveillance data was available for at least part of the study period. We examined summary reports for Department of Health and Human Services Region 9 (Arizona, California, Nevada, and Hawaii) and these were available beginning with the 1997–1998 season (influenza) and the 1999–2000 season (RSV) through the 2007–2008 season, thus our analyses of viral seasons are restricted to these years. CDC surveillance data is based on data collection by both US World Health Organization Collaborating Laboratories and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) laboratories. These state public health laboratories test samples and report to CDC the number of specimens tested and the number positive for each infection of interest. For each influenza and RSV season we assigned a season peak date, defined as the last day of the calendar week during which the highest percent of samples tested were positive for influenza virus or RSV isolates. Some infection seasons experienced two peaks of equal amplitude. In these cases, we assigned two peaks. We then calculated the length of time between birth and first possible exposure to an infection season, using the season peak date as the reference date for each infection season. We categorized children as having had their first possible exposure to an influenza or RSV season during the first three months of life, three to six months of age, six to nine months of age, nine to twelve months of age, or more than twelve months of age, as previous studies using proxies of infection exposures (such as day care attendance and level of community infections) have used similar 3-month measures. (11, 23, 24)

Since detailed, week-by-week surveillance data was available for influenza, we also created a season intensity variable for each of the eleven influenza seasons from 1997–98 through 2007–08. We categorized each season as having low, medium, or high intensity based on the peak percentage of samples that tested positive for influenza virus isolates during the influenza season. We used cutoffs for the percentage of positive samples of < 20%, 20–29%, and ≥30% for low, medium, and high intensity seasons, respectively, and we examined whether the intensity of the influenza season modified risk for ALL among those exposed to an influenza season in the first three months of life. Less detailed data are available for RSV seasons thus we were not able to compare intensity across seasons for RSV.

Information on the mother’s reproductive history is included on the birth certificate, and we used data on the number of previous live births to create a birth order variable, categorized as first birth, second or third birth, and fourth or subsequent birth.

We used unconditional logistic regression analyses to obtain odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of leukemia. We calculated measures of association for each month of birth, using the month of November as the reference value because we hypothesized that infants born in November would be most likely to be exposed to seasonal infections that peak in winter or spring months within the first few months of life. Since we do not have a priori evidence that any factors in our dataset are associated with timing of birth, we adjusted only for birth year in analyses related to birth month and timing of birth around infectious season peaks. For birth order analyses, we adjusted for birth year, mother’s race and mother’s age. In analyses of timing of birth in relation to infection seasons, we also stratified on mother’s parity (first birth versus second or subsequent birth) and age at diagnosis (<1 year, 1–5 years). We also tested the interaction between timing of birth and birth order (first versus second or subsequent birth) by adding a product term to the model. A previous study reported racial differences for birth order on ALL risk (25), thus we also examined birth order associations by race/ethnicity. Due to changes in vaccination recommendations for children across the study years, we conducted a sensitivity analysis limiting to children born between 1997 and 2003 only. Finally, in additional sensitivity analyses, we excluded preterm births, defined as any birth prior to 37 weeks of gestation, and limited analyses to B-cell leukemia cases.

RESULTS

ALL cases were more frequently male than their respective controls, and a higher proportion had private health insurance compared to controls. ALL cases were more frequently Hispanic. (Table 1)

Table 1.

Birth and Demographic Characteristics of Subjects in a Study of Leukemia Risk Among California Children Diagnosed Between 1988 and 2007

Controls ALL cases
(n = 68040) (n = 3402)
N %a N %a
Sex
male 34788 51.1 1921 56.5
female 33252 48.9 1481 43.5
Gestational age, weeks
≤ 36 6557 10.2 332 10.3
37–42 55191 85.6 2761 85.6
43+ 2692 4.2 131 4.1
missing 3600 178
Age of mother
<20 7466 11.0 325 9.6
20–29 35669 52.4 1705 50.1
30–34 15674 23.0 826 24.3
35+ 9222 13.6 546 16.0
missing 9 0
Mother’s education
≤ 8 years 8166 13.8 410 13.8
Some high school (9–11 yrs) 10673 18.0 511 17.2
High school diploma (12 yrs) 17519 29.6 895 30.2
Some college (13–15 yrs) 11616 19.6 553 18.7
College diploma or higher (16+ yrs) 11203 18.9 596 20.1
missing 8863 437
Mother’s race
white 24695 36.5 1233 36.4
hispanic 30526 45.1 1680 49.6
other 12439 18.4 472 13.9
missing 380 17
Season of birth
Spring 16713 24.6 864 25.4
Summer 17500 25.7 924 27.2
Fall 17400 25.6 807 23.7
Winter 16427 24.1 807 23.7
Parity
first birth 26803 39.4 1288 37.9
second or third birth 32651 48.0 1669 49.1
fourth or subsequent birth 8549 12.6 443 13.0
missing 37 2
Payment source for prenatal care
Private insurance 30074 50.7 1656 55.6
Other 29238 49.3 1321 44.4
missing 8728 425
Age at diagnosis (cases only)
0 196 5.8
1 499 14.7
2 882 25.9
3 820 24.1
4 623 18.3
5 382 11.2
a

Percent of non-missing

ALL cases were more frequently born in spring or summer months (March, June or July) compared to November. (Supplementary Table 1) Elevated but imprecise point estimates were also observed for other months. When we stratified by mother’s parity, results for birth month were stronger among first born children, and we did not observe an association for ALL among second or subsequent births. Excluding cases diagnosed in infancy (less than one year of age) did not change our results.

When we examined the timing of births in relation to influenza and RSV seasons, we observed an increased risk of ALL among those whose first exposure to an influenza season occurred at nine to twelve months of age compared to those exposed within the first three months of life (OR and 95% CI 1.16 [1.00, 1.35]). (Table 2) We also observed increased point estimates for those born three to six and six to nine months prior to an infection season, although these associations were not statistically significant. We observed a similar pattern with a stronger effect estimate among first births (OR and 95% CI 1.44 [1.13, 1.82] for those age nine to twelve months) and we did not observe an association among second or later births. Excluding cases diagnosed in infancy (less than one year of age) did not change our results (OR and 95% CI for all ALL cases exposed at nine to twelve months: 1.17 [1.00, 1.36]). We observed very similar associations in analysis of age at first potential exposure to an RSV season. (Supplementary Table 2) Children who were nine to twelve months of age at their first exposure to an RSV season experienced increased risk of ALL (OR and 95% CI 1.18 [1.02, 1.37]) compared to those with potential exposure during the first three months of life, with elevated point estimates also observed for those with first exposure opportunity at three to six and six to nine months. Among first births, children nine to twelve months of age at first exposure had a 30% increase in risk (OR and 95% CI 1.30 [1.03, 1.65]) compared to those exposed at zero to three months of age. We did not observe an association between ALL and age at first exposure to RSV season among children of second or higher birth order. We did not observe evidence for multiplicative interaction between timing of birth and birth order (p=0.12 and p=0.73 for interaction between birth order and timing of influenza and RSV seasons, respectively).

Table 2.

Analysis of age at First Exposure to an Influenza Season in a Study of Leukemia Risk Among California Children Diagnosed Between 1997 and 2007

All cases and controls First births Second or subsequent births
Controls (n=31460) Cases (n=1573) ORa 95% CI Controls (n=12226) Cases (n=585) ORa 95% CI Controls (n=19222) Cases (n=988) ORa 95% CI
All ALL cases combined
Age at first exposure to influenza season
0 to 3 months 9792 455 ref 3814 163 ref 5973 292 ref
3 to 6 months 8018 416 1.12 0.97, 1.28 3151 153 1.14 0.91, 1.42 4864 263 1.11 0.93, 1.31
6 to 9 months 7543 380 1.08 0.94, 1.25 2896 130 1.05 0.83, 1.33 4645 250 1.10 0.93, 1.31
9 to 12 months 5444 294 1.16 1.00, 1.35 2087 128 1.44 1.13, 1.82 3355 166 1.01 0.83, 1.23
> 12 months 663 28 0.91 0.62, 1.34 278 11 0.93 0.50, 1.73 385 17 0.90 0.55, 1.49
a

ORs adjusted for birth year

When we examined age at first exposure to influenza by season intensity, we observed that infants exposed at 6 months of age or older during a medium-intensity season had increased risk of ALL. (Table 3) We also observed an elevated, though imprecise, estimate for children exposed at nine to twelve months of age during a high intensity season. There was a strong association between delayed exposure to influenza during medium- and high-intensity seasons among first births. Influenza season intensity did not impact ALL risk among second or higher births, and delayed age of exposure did not increase ALL risk in low-intensity influenza seasons.

Table 3.

Analysis of age at First Exposure to an Influenza Season and the Intensity of that Season in a Study of Leukemia Risk Among California Children Diagnosed Between 1997 and 2007

Low intensity influenza season Medium intensity influenza season High intensity influenza season
Controls Cases OR 95% CI Controls Cases OR 95% CI Controls Cases OR 95% CI
Age at first exposure to influenza season
0 to 3 months 2923 139 ref 3689 164 ref 3180 152 ref
3 to 6 months 2140 109 1.07 0.83, 1.39 3066 150 1.10 0.88, 1.38 2812 157 1.17 0.93, 1.47
6 to 9 months 1990 99 1.05 0.80, 1.36 2904 158 1.22 0.98, 1.53 2649 123 0.97 0.76, 1.24
9 to 12 months 2010 101 1.06 0.81, 1.37 1977 117 1.33 1.04, 1.70 837 49 1.23 0.88, 1.71
> 12 months 189 9 1.00 0.50, 2.00 474 19 0.90 0.56, 1.46 0 0
First births
Age at first exposure to influenza season
0 to 3 months 1122 48 ref 1409 54 ref 1283 61 ref
3 to 6 months 859 38 1.03 0.67, 1.60 1195 53 1.16 0.79, 1.70 1097 62 1.19 0.83, 1.71
6 to 9 months 743 35 1.10 0.71, 1.72 1118 53 1.24 0.84, 1.82 1035 42 0.85 0.57, 1.28
9 to 12 months 766 37 1.13 0.73, 1.75 762 52 1.78 1.21, 2.63 313 24 1.61 0.99, 2.63
> 12 months 88 2 190 9 1.24 0.60, 2.54 0 0
Second or subsequent births
Age at first exposure to influenza season
0 to 3 months 1799 91 ref 2280 110 ref 1894 91 ref
3 to 6 months 1280 71 1.10 0.80, 1.51 1871 97 1.08 0.81, 1.42 1713 95 1.15 0.86, 1.55
6 to 9 months 1247 64 1.02 0.73, 1.41 1786 105 1.22 0.93, 1.60 1612 81 1.05 0.77, 1.42
9 to 12 months 1243 64 1.02 0.73, 1.41 1215 65 1.11 0.81, 1.52 524 25 0.99 0.63, 1.56
> 12 months 101 7 1.37 0.62, 3.03 284 10 0.73 0.38, 1.41 0 0

Among all ALL cases combined, risk estimates decreased with increasing birth order, although confidence intervals include the null. (Table 4) In non-Hispanic white children, we again observed decreased point estimates with increased birth order, with a statistically significant decrease in risk for children of fourth or higher birth order (OR and 95% CI 0.76 [0.59, 0.96]). We did not observe a birth order association in Hispanic children.

Table 4.

Analysis of Birth Order in a Study of Leukemia Risk Among California Children Diagnosed Between 1988 and 2007

All cases non-Hispanic white Hispanic
Controls (n=68040) Cases (n=3402) OR a 95% CI Controls (n=24695) Cases (n=1233) ORb 95% CI Controls (n=30526) Cases (n=1680) ORb 95% CI
Birth order
First 26803 1288 10562 534 ref 10904 563 ref
Second 21131 1076 1.00 0.92, 1.09 8327 420 0.95 0.83, 1.09 8838 490 1.03 0.90, 1.17
Third 11520 593 0.95 0.85, 1.05 3814 195 0.94 0.79, 1.12 5888 326 0.99 0.85, 1.15
>= Fourth 8549 443 0.91 0.81, 1.03 1978 84 0.76 0.59, 0.96 4887 300 1.05 0.89, 1.24
missing 37 2 14 0 9 1
a

Adjusted for birth year, maternal race, and mother’s age

b

Adjusted for birth year and maternal age

Limiting leukemia analyses to the B-cell subtype and, in separate analyses, excluding preterm births, and limiting to birth years 1997–2003 did not change results for any of our analyses. We were not able to conduct analyses stratified by sex due to small numbers.

DISCUSSION

In this large population-based study of childhood cancer in children age 0–5 in California, we investigated associations between several indirect measures of infection in early life, including month of birth, timing of birth around influenza and RSV seasons, birth order, and childhood acute lympocytic leukemia. Although we do not have data for individual level infections in our population, previous studies have demonstrated that month of birth, timing of birth around infection seasons, and birth order all increase risk of exposure to several common viral infections in childhood.(16, 17) For ALL, we observed positive associations for births in the spring and summer months, births that occurred nine to twelve months before influenza and RSV seasons, and negative associations for higher birth orders. The associations for birth month and timing of birth around infection seasons were stronger for first births.

Previous reports on the influence of season on childhood leukemia have not been consistent. Four studies have suggested seasonal variation in births for leukemia, and three of the four have suggested that the birth peak occurs in late winter or spring(February (26), March (27), and April(28)), while the fourth suggested two distinct peaks in February and August(29). The variation seen in previous studies may be due to variations between community burden of infections between countries or variation in timing of infection seasons from year to year. The association we observed between ALL and birth in the spring and summer months may be indicative of delayed exposure to seasonal infections that peak during winter months, since these infants would experience the longest timespan between birth and subsequent influenza or other infection season. Our results utilizing influenza and RSV surveillance data support this hypothesis, since we observed an increased risk estimate for those born 9 to 12 months prior to these infection seasons. When examining the total case population, we also observed increased point estimates for those born 3 to 6 and 6 to 9 months prior to an infection season, although these associations were not formally statistically significant. Associations with both virus seasons were observed among first births only, which may indicate that children with older siblings experience greater exposure to infectious agents year-round and that timing of birth in relation to infection seasons is less important for these children.

Several studies have reported reduced risk of ALL associated with higher birth order (25, 3036), although other studies have reported either no association (26, 3745) or a positive association(24, 46, 47). A recent pooled analysis of data from five US states examined associations between birth order and childhood cancers and found a decreased risk of ALL among third (OR and 95% CI 0.90 [0.82, 0.99]) and fourth or higher order (OR and 95% CI 0.90 [0.80, 1.01]) births. (48) We observed a reduced risk of ALL associated with higher birth order among non-Hispanic whites but not Hispanics. This is consistent with a previous study from Northern California (25) and may indicate that birth order is a reliable predictor of infection exposure among non-Hispanic whites but not Hispanics and possibly explain differences between studies that ignore race/ethnicity when examining birth order associations. Cultural variation may account for this difference, as Hispanic populations are more likely to have larger households that include extended family members or unrelated individuals.(49, 50) Thus, even first-born children in Hispanic families may live in close contact with other non-sibling children.

Some studies that have tested the delayed infection hypothesis by examining medical or hospital records for history of infections in early life.(51) However, maternal immunoglobulins, mostly IgG1, are transferred across the placenta in the third trimester of pregnancy, with maximal transport beginning at 32 weeks of gestation.(52, 53) These antibodies provide passive immunity for infections to which the mother has been exposed, and their presence in the first months of life serves to protect the infant from severe disease. Nonetheless there is evidence that the neonatal system is able to mount a response to immune challenge despite passive immunity from the mother.(5456) Thus even exposure to infections in the earliest stages of life may elicit some stimulation of the immune system and, according to Greaves’ hypothesis, may contribute to a decreased risk of ALL.

We hypothesized that infants whose first exposure to influenza was during a particularly high intensity season would experience decreased risk of ALL since a higher community burden of infection increases the likelihood of exposure. We observed that infants exposed during the second half of their first year (6 months or older) during a medium-intensity season were at increased ALL risk, particularly among first births. First born children with delayed exposure (at nine to twelve months of age) during high-intensity seasons also experienced substantial increased risk for ALL. There is evidence from the 2009 influenza pandemic that although infants did not experience an increased burden of respiratory infections during the pandemic, parent-initiated visits for respiratory symptoms increased during that time.(57) Increased parental awareness due to media reports and public health campaigns during a particularly high intensity influenza season may result in increased precautions among parents to protect their newborn infants and thus delay their first contacts to viruses to a later time in infancy.

Breastfeeding impacts exposure to infections and immune response among infants, and it has been suggested that breastfeeding may modulate the infant’s immune system thereby helping it to respond effectively to infection later in life.(58, 59) Breast milk contains soluble and cellular compounds, including components of the maternal immune system such as leukocytes, which likely aid immune development and maturation.(60) Previous studies have shown that long-term (> 6 months) breastfeeding is associated with decreased risk of ALL, with a meta-analysis estimating an approximate 25% decrease in risk (OR 0.76 95% CI 0.68, 0.84).(58) However, a case-control study in northern California did not observe associations between breastfeeding and ALL.(61) Breastfeeding rates in the United States have risen during the study period, and in a national survey, the percentage of California infants who were still breastfed at 6 months was about 40–49% in the year 2000.(62) We did not have information on breastfeeding among our study population and thus we were unable to examine its influence on ALL in our analyses. However, we expect that our results would be attenuated among breastfed infants and more pronounced among infants who were not breastfed.

Some of the most compelling evidence in support of an infectious ALL etiology in early childhood stems from studies of day care attendance. These studies have consistently shown a decreased risk of pediatric leukemia for regular daycare attenders, who would have a high level of exposure to infectious agents, compared to children who do not attend day care.(912) A recent meta-analysis also found a reduced risk of ALL for day care attenders compared to non-attenders (OR 0.76 and 95% CI 0.67, 0.87).(63) We did not have information on day care attendance among our study population, although we expect that the timing of birth would have less of an effect among daycare attenders since these children are more likely to be exposed to pathogens at an early age regardless of season.

The proxies for exposure to infections in early life used in this and other studies are not actual exposures. However, high quality influenza surveillance data was available for a subset of study years and helped us to pinpoint the specific timing of exposure opportunity to two common infections in early childhood and sensitivity analyses by birth order further corroborated our findings. We chose to evaluate influenza and RSV separately as the timing of their respective peak seasons is distinct. However there is overlap in the overall duration and timing of the infection seasons and thus we cannot rule out that we are picking up the same signal in the separate analyses. In addition to having high quality surveillance data available for these two infections, they represent the most common causes of respiratory illness in young children.(6468) Therefore we believe that utilizing data on these two infections in particular captures important sources of immune challenge in our target population. Although we relied on several proxies for both exposure and early life immune challenge, we are confident that our approach represents one of the most comprehensive approximations to exposure opportunity and common infections in early childhood. Other approaches used to evaluate infection in early childhood include studies which rely on maternal recall or medical records. Studies have shown that maternal recall for a child’s health care utilization, vaccination status, and infections is poor. (6971) Approaches using medical records are also problematic since families may not visit a health care provider for each illness, and this may be dependent upon illness severity and other factors. Our utilization of season-specific surveillance data on two common sources of early childhood infection creates a unique approach to indirect exposure measurement that complements other studies using proxies for childhood infections.

We used a 3-month window to estimate the timeframe of exposure. Greaves’ hypothesis is based on a lack of immune modulation in early infancy, although an optimum exposure window has not been defined. A three-month exposure window may not represent the most biologically relevant timing for immune modulation and more work is needed to identify the biological implications of exposure at different periods in infancy.

Our study is the largest to estimate the effect of month of birth and timing of birth around influenza and RSV seasons in childhood leukemia among young children 0–5 years old. Since we have data available for a wide range of years, we do not expect that our results could be influenced by chance fluctuations in monthly birth rates of a single year. In this study of a large population of childhood cancer cases, we demonstrated that timing of birth and its proximity to infection season peaks impacted risk for childhood leukemia. While we were not able to test Kinlen’s population mixing hypothesis with this study, our results support Greaves’ hypothesis that delayed exposure to infections in early childhood increases risk of ALL.

Supplementary Material

1
2

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by grants from the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R21ES018960 [PI: J Heck], R21ES019986 [PI: B Ritz], P30ES007048 [PI: F Gilliland, core facilities grant supporting the working of M Cockburn]). Dr. Erin Marcotte was supported by pre-doctoral and post-doctoral fellowships from the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute (T32CA09142 and T32CA099936).

Footnotes

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Howlader NNA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA, Edwards BK, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Greaves MF. Aetiology of acute leukaemia. Lancet. 1997;349:344–9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)09412-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Belson M, Kingsley B, Holmes A. Risk factors for acute leukemia in children: a review. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115:138–45. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ford AM, Ridge SA, Cabrera ME, Mahmoud H, Steel CM, Chan LC, et al. In utero rearrangements in the trithorax-related oncogene in infant leukaemias. Nature. 1993;363:358–60. doi: 10.1038/363358a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gale KB, Ford AM, Repp R, Borkhardt A, Keller C, Eden OB, et al. Backtracking leukemia to birth: identification of clonotypic gene fusion sequences in neonatal blood spots. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:13950–4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Greaves MF, Maia AT, Wiemels JL, Ford AM. Leukemia in twins: lessons in natural history. Blood. 2003;102:2321–33. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-12-3817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wiemels JL, Cazzaniga G, Daniotti M, Eden OB, Addison GM, Masera G, et al. Prenatal origin of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in children. Lancet. 1999;354:1499–503. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)09403-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Wiemels JL, Xiao Z, Buffler PA, Maia AT, Ma X, Dicks BM, et al. In utero origin of t(8;21) AML1-ETO translocations in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2002;99:3801–5. doi: 10.1182/blood.v99.10.3801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Urayama KY, Ma X, Buffler PA. Exposure to infections through day-care attendance and risk of childhood leukaemia. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2008;132:259–66. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncn271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Eden T. Aetiology of childhood leukaemia. Cancer Treat Rev. 2010;36:286–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gilham C, Peto J, Simpson J, Roman E, Eden TO, Greaves MF, et al. Day care in infancy and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: findings from UK case-control study. BMJ. 2005;330:1294. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38428.521042.8F. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ma X, Urayama K, Chang J, Wiemels JL, Buffler PA. Infection and pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2009;42:117–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Crouch S, Lightfoot T, Simpson J, Smith A, Ansell P, Roman E. Infectious illness in children subsequently diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: modeling the trends from birth to diagnosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:402–8. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Greaves MF. Speculations on the cause of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia : official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, UK. 1988;2:120–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kinlen L. Evidence for an infective cause of childhood leukaemia: comparison of a Scottish new town with nuclear reprocessing sites in Britain. Lancet. 1988;2:1323–7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90867-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sommer C, Resch B, Simoes EA. Risk factors for severe respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection. The open microbiology journal. 2011;5:144–54. doi: 10.2174/1874285801105010144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Witso E, Cinek O, Aldrin M, Grinde B, Rasmussen T, Wetlesen T, et al. Predictors of sub-clinical enterovirus infections in infants: a prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:459–68. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Steliarova-Foucher E, Stiller C, Lacour B, Kaatsch P. International Classification of Childhood Cancer, third edition. Cancer. 2005;103:1457–67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Heck JE, Lombardi CA, Cockburn M, Meyers TJ, Wilhelm M, Ritz B. Epidemiology of rhabdoid tumors of early childhood. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2013;60:77–81. doi: 10.1002/pbc.24141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dowell SF. Seasonal variation in host susceptibility and cycles of certain infectious diseases. Emerging infectious diseases. 2001;7:369–74. doi: 10.3201/eid0703.010301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Seasonal Influenza Surveillance Reports. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; [cited 2012 August 7]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/pastreports.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Influenza Surveillance Program Data Summary Archive. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Public Health; [cited 2013 February 2]. Available from: http://www.cdph.ca.gov/data/statistics/Pages/CISPDataArchive.aspx. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dickinson HO, Nyari TA, Parker L. Childhood solid tumours in relation to infections in the community in Cumbria during pregnancy and around the time of birth. Br J Cancer. 2002;87:746–50. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jourdan-Da Silva N, Perel Y, Mechinaud F, Plouvier E, Gandemer V, Lutz P, et al. Infectious diseases in the first year of life, perinatal characteristics and childhood acute leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 2004;90:139–45. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Urayama KY, Ma X, Selvin S, Metayer C, Chokkalingam AP, Wiemels JL, et al. Early life exposure to infections and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Int J Cancer. 2011;128:1632–43. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Murray L, McCarron P, Bailie K, Middleton R, Davey Smith G, Dempsey S, et al. Association of early life factors and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in childhood: historical cohort study. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:356–61. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Basta NO, James PW, Craft AW, McNally RJ. Season of birth and diagnosis for childhood cancer in Northern England, 1968–2005. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2010;24:309–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2010.01112.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sorensen HT, Pedersen L, Olsen J, Rothman K. Seasonal variation in month of birth and diagnosis of early childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. JAMA. 2001;285:168–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Nyari TA, Kajtar P, Bartyik K, Thurzo L, McNally R, Parker L. Seasonal variation of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia is different between girls and boys. Pathol Oncol Res. 2008;14:423–8. doi: 10.1007/s12253-008-9017-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Dockerty JD, Draper G, Vincent T, Rowan SD, Bunch KJ. Case-control study of parental age, parity and socioeconomic level in relation to childhood cancers. Int J Epidemiol. 2001;30:1428–37. doi: 10.1093/ije/30.6.1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hjalgrim LL, Rostgaard K, Hjalgrim H, Westergaard T, Thomassen H, Forestier E, et al. Birth weight and risk for childhood leukemia in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Iceland. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2004;96:1549–56. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Infante-Rivard C, Fortier I, Olson E. Markers of infection, breast-feeding and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:1559–64. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ma X, Metayer C, Does MB, Buffler PA. Maternal pregnancy loss, birth characteristics, and childhood leukemia (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:1075–83. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0356-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.McKinney PA, Juszczak E, Findlay E, Smith K, Thomson CS. Pre- and perinatal risk factors for childhood leukaemia and other malignancies: a Scottish case control study. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1844–51. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Schuz J, Kaatsch P, Kaletsch U, Meinert R, Michaelis J. Association of childhood cancer with factors related to pregnancy and birth. Int J Epidemiol. 1999;28:631–9. doi: 10.1093/ije/28.4.631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.van Steensel-Moll HA, Valkenburg HA, van Zanen GE. Childhood leukemia and infectious diseases in the first year of life: a register-based case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:590–4. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Perrillat F, Clavel J, Auclerc MF, Baruchel A, Leverger G, Nelken B, et al. Day-care, early common infections and childhood acute leukaemia: a multicentre French case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2002;86:1064–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Dockerty JD, Skegg DC, Elwood JM, Herbison GP, Becroft DM, Lewis ME. Infections, vaccinations, and the risk of childhood leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 1999;80:1483–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Neglia JP, Linet MS, Shu XO, Severson RK, Potter JD, Mertens AC, et al. Patterns of infection and day care utilization and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:234–40. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Okcu MF, Goodman KJ, Carozza SE, Weiss NS, Burau KD, Bleyer WA, et al. Birth weight, ethnicity, and occurrence of cancer in children: a population-based, incident case-control study in the State of Texas, USA. Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:595–602. doi: 10.1023/a:1019555912243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Paltiel O, Harlap S, Deutsch L, Knaanie A, Massalha S, Tiram E, et al. Birth weight and other risk factors for acute leukemia in the Jerusalem Perinatal Study cohort. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1057–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Petridou E, Kassimos D, Kalmanti M, Kosmidis H, Haidas S, Flytzani V, et al. Age of exposure to infections and risk of childhood leukaemia. BMJ. 1993;307:774. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6907.774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reynolds P, Von Behren J, Elkin EP. Birth characteristics and leukemia in young children. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:603–13. doi: 10.1093/aje/155.7.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Rosenbaum PF, Buck GM, Brecher ML. Early child-care and preschool experiences and the risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;152:1136–44. doi: 10.1093/aje/152.12.1136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oksuzyan S, Crespi CM, Cockburn M, Mezei G, Kheifets L. Birth weight and other perinatal characteristics and childhood leukemia in California. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012;36:e359–65. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ou SX, Han D, Severson RK, Chen Z, Neglia JP, Reaman GH, et al. Birth characteristics, maternal reproductive history, hormone use during pregnancy, and risk of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia by immunophenotype (United States) Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13:15–25. doi: 10.1023/a:1013986809917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Shaw G, Lavey R, Jackson R, Austin D. Association of childhood leukemia with maternal age, birth order, and paternal occupation. A case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119:788–95. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Von Behren J, Spector LG, Mueller BA, Carozza SE, Chow EJ, Fox EE, et al. Birth order and risk of childhood cancer: a pooled analysis from five US States. Int J Cancer. 2010;128:2709–16. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Popenoe D. American family decline, 1960–1990 - a review and appraisal. J Marriage Fam. 1993;5:527–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Roth W. Multiple origins, uncertain destinies: Hispanics and the American future. Contemporary Sociology. 2007;36:466–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Cardwell CR, McKinney PA, Patterson CC, Murray LJ. Infections in early life and childhood leukaemia risk: a UK case-control study of general practitioner records. Br J Cancer. 2008;99:1529–33. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Palfi M, Selbing A. Placental transport of maternal immunoglobulin G. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1998;39:24–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1998.tb00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Malek A, Sager R, Kuhn P, Nicolaides KH, Schneider H. Evolution of maternofetal transport of immunoglobulins during human pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1996;36:248–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1996.tb00172.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hodgins DC, Shewen PE. Vaccination of neonates: problem and issues. Vaccine. 2012;30:1541–59. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Adkins B, Leclerc C, Marshall-Clarke S. Neonatal adaptive immunity comes of age. Nature reviews Immunology. 2004;4:553–64. doi: 10.1038/nri1394. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wood N, Siegrist CA. Neonatal immunization: where do we stand? Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2011;24:190–5. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328345d563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ede LC, Loeffelholz MJ, Alvarez-Fernandez P, Pong DL, Patel JA, McCormick DP, et al. Effect of the 2009 influenza A/H1N1 pandemic on viral respiratory infections in the first year of life. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31:1107–12. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31825f29db. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kwan ML, Buffler PA, Abrams B, Kiley VA. Breastfeeding and the risk of childhood leukemia: a meta-analysis. Public Health Rep. 2004;119:521–35. doi: 10.1016/j.phr.2004.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Davis MK. Review of the evidence for an association between infant feeding and childhood cancer. International journal of cancer Supplement = Journal international du cancer Supplement. 1998;11:29–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Field CJ. The immunological components of human milk and their effect on immune development in infants. The Journal of nutrition. 2005;135:1–4. doi: 10.1093/jn/135.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kwan ML, Buffler PA, Wiemels JL, Metayer C, Selvin S, Ducore JM, et al. Breastfeeding patterns and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Cancer. 2005;93:379–84. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.CDC National Immunization Survey. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control; Breastfeeding among U.S. children born 2000–2009. [cited 2013 January 20]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/NIS_data/index.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Urayama KY, Buffler PA, Gallagher ER, Ayoob JM, Ma X. A meta-analysis of the association between day-care attendance and childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:718–32. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hall CB, Weinberg GA, Iwane MK, Blumkin AK, Edwards KM, Staat MA, et al. The burden of respiratory syncytial virus infection in young children. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:588–98. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0804877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Iwane MK, Edwards KM, Szilagyi PG, Walker FJ, Griffin MR, Weinberg GA, et al. Population-based surveillance for hospitalizations associated with respiratory syncytial virus, influenza virus, and parainfluenza viruses among young children. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1758–64. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Poehling KA, Edwards KM, Weinberg GA, Szilagyi P, Staat MA, Iwane MK, et al. The underrecognized burden of influenza in young children. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:31–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa054869. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Nair H, Nokes DJ, Gessner BD, Dherani M, Madhi SA, Singleton RJ, et al. Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:1545–55. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60206-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Kramarz P, Shay DK, Davis RL, DeStefano F, et al. Influenza and the rates of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young children. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:232–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200001273420402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.McKinney PA, Alexander FE, Nicholson C, Cartwright RA, Carrette J. Mothers’ reports of childhood vaccinations and infections and their concordance with general practitioner records. Journal of public health medicine. 1991;13:13–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Murray KD, El-Mohandes AA, El-Khorazaty MN, Kiely M. Low-income minority mothers’ reports of infant health care utilisation compared with medical records. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007;21:274–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00800.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Miller JE, Gaboda D, Davis D. Early childhood chronic illness: comparability of maternal reports and medical records. Vital and health statistics Series 2, Data evaluation and methods research. 20011–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

RESOURCES