Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2014 Aug 22;281(1789):20140548. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0548

Symbiotic state influences life-history strategy of a clonal cnidarian

Brian L Bingham 1,, James L Dimond 2, Gisèle Muller-Parker 3
PMCID: PMC4100504  PMID: 25009060

Abstract

Along the North American Pacific coast, the common intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima engages in facultative, flexible symbioses with Symbiodinium muscatinei (a dinoflagellate) and Elliptochloris marina (a chlorophyte). Determining how symbiotic state affects host fitness is essential to understanding the ecological significance of engaging in such flexible relationships with diverse symbionts. Fitness consequences of hosting S. muscatinei, E. marina or negligible numbers of either symbiont (aposymbiosis) were investigated by measuring growth, cloning by fission and gonad development after 8.5–11 months of sustained exposure to high, moderate or low irradiance under seasonal environmental conditions. Both symbiotic state and irradiance affected host fitness, leading to divergent life-history strategies. Moderate and high irradiances led to a greater level of gonad development in individuals hosting E. marina, while high irradiance and high summer temperature promoted cloning in individuals hosting S. muscatinei and reduced fitness of aposymbiotic anemones. Associating with S. muscatinei may contribute to the success of A. elegantissima as a spatial competitor on the high shore: (i) by offsetting the costs of living under high temperature and irradiance conditions, and (ii) by promoting a high fission rate and clonal expansion. Our results suggest that basic life-history characteristics of a clonal cnidarian can be affected by the identity of the endosymbionts it hosts.

Keywords: Anthopleura elegantissima, Symbiodinium, fitness, life history, symbiosis, reproduction

1. Introduction

Symbiotic relationships are fundamental to the biology and ecology of numerous archaea, bacteria, protists, fungi, plants and animals. In close associations of this kind, symbiont presence, identity and physiology can critically affect host fitness as measured by host growth, asexual replication and sexual reproduction. For example, removal of a bacterial symbiont from the fungus Rhizopus microsporus completely eliminates vegetative growth by preventing production of sporangia or spores [1]. Among plants, the presence and identity of mycorrhizal fungal symbionts can change relative rates of seed production and vegetative replication of the host [24], and numerous studies have demonstrated the effects of endosymbionts on basic reproductive processes in insects [59]. Evidence from symbiotic cnidarians reveals that loss of symbionts can reduce sexual reproduction [10,11], and a change in the symbiont complement can transform mutualistic partners to parasites [12]. In one coral species, the specific clade of the symbiont (Symbiodinium sp.) affects egg size at spawning [13].

On the northern Pacific coast of North America, the common intertidal sea anemones Anthopleura elegantissima and Anthopleura xanthogrammica host two taxonomically distinct phytosymbionts: the dinoflagellate Symbiodinium muscatinei (zooxanthellae [14,15]) and the chlorophyte Elliptochloris marina (zoochlorellae [16]). These symbionts, which can occur singly or together in individual anemones, have different physiologies, growth rates and biotrophic relationships with their hosts [1721]. Under high irradiance and temperature conditions, zooxanthellae will supplant zoochlorellae in A. elegantissima, and intense, ongoing stress can lead to complete bleaching (loss of symbionts) and hosts that are functionally aposymbiotic [22]. Zooxanthellate A. elegantissima are generally more productive than individuals hosting zoochlorellae: annual net productivity is estimated at 92 and 60 g C m−2 y−1, respectively, for zooxanthellate and zoochlorellate A. elegantissima in the San Juan Islands, WA, USA [19]. Thus, a change of symbiotic partners or complete loss of the symbionts may affect host nutritional balance leading to changes in growth or reproduction of the host.

The goal of our work was to determine how the presence and identity of symbionts affect growth and reproduction of A. elegantissima. We predicted that overall fitness would be highest in individuals hosting zooxanthellae, followed by those hosting zoochlorellae, and finally by those lacking symbionts altogether. Anthopleura elegantissima is the most abundant intertidal sea anemone on the west coast of North America [23], with densities reaching 500 individuals m−2 [24] and with productivity rates that rival those of intertidal seaweeds [25]. Factors that substantially change anemone fitness, therefore, could cascade through this system, impacting the rocky shore community as a whole.

2. Material and methods

(a). Anemone experiment

On 3 September 2009, 180 A. elegantissima were collected from a rock outcrop on Tatoosh Island, WA, USA (48.392° N, 124.735° W) between +1 and +2 m mean lower low water (MLLW). Based on colour alone, 60 each of zooxanthellate (brown anemones hosting more than 90% S. muscatinei), zoochlorellate (green anemones hosting more than 90% E. marina) and aposymbiotic individuals (pale anemones hosting low densities of either symbiont) were collected from adjacent areas of the same rock surface (figure 1a). The anemones were transported on ice to Shannon Point Marine Center (SPMC) in Anacortes, WA, USA, where symbiotic state was verified for each anemone by clipping a single tentacle, compressing it on a microscope slide and determining the relative abundance of zooxanthellae and zoochlorellae. In this species, tentacle samples reasonably approximate symbiont composition, particularly if populations are dominated by a single symbiont [26], as they were in this case. Only four of 180 anemones had to be eliminated because they hosted mixed symbiont populations. The very low background populations of symbionts in aposymbiotic individuals were primarily zooxanthellae.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Anthopleura elegantissima (a) at the collection site on Tatoosh Island, WA, USA, and (b) in the experimental tank at SPMC. Dashed lines indicate abrupt changes in the symbiotic complements of the anemones. (Online version in colour.)

In the laboratory, the anemones were cleaned of debris, allowed to attach to pre-weighed slate tiles (4.7 × 4.7 × 0.8 cm), and held for one month prior to the start of the experiment in an indoor flow-through seawater system with natural sunlight entering directly through large windows. Ten days after collection, each anemone on its tile was blotted dry and weighed, and initial body weight was determined by subtracting the known weight of the wet tile.

To determine how symbiotic state affects host growth and reproduction under different environmental conditions, the anemones were moved to an outside tank (3 m diameter, 0.9 m deep, 6400 l volume) and held there from October 2009 to September 2010, a period chosen to include an entire reproductive cycle and the full seasonal range of conditions experienced by these anemones. Locally, A. elegantissima begin developing gonads in January, spawn from August to October [27] and are exposed to the harshest physical stresses during mid-day summer low tides [28]. Shields were used to reduce natural irradiance in each of three treatment groups, approximating conditions that favour zooxanthellate, zoochlorellate and aposymbiotic anemones, respectively [20]: ultraviolet (UV)-transparent acrylic shield for 85% irradiance, UV-transparent acrylic shield plus a layer of window screen for 43% irradiance and opaque grey PVC shield for 2% irradiance. The shields were supported 14 cm above round, PVC platforms (60 cm diameter) covered with artificial turf to discourage anemones from leaving their tiles. Two platforms, each holding 10 zooxanthellate, 10 zoochlorellate and 10 aposymbiotic anemones, were randomly assigned to each irradiance treatment (figure 1b).

Ambient irradiance levels were obtained from a Padilla Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve database (D. Bulthuis, N. Burnett and H. Bohlmann 2011, unpublished data, Padilla Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Monitoring Program; http://cdmo.baruch.sc.edu/). The monitoring instrument (located 15 km from SPMC) measured photosynthetically active radiation (400–700 nm) at sea level every 15 min throughout the study period. Irradiance in the treatments was determined by using a Biospherical Instruments QSL-100 4π quantum sensor to make repeated measurements under the shields during aerial exposures and calculating the average percentage reduction. Hobo WaterTemp Pro dataloggers on the platforms monitored temperatures at 5 min intervals.

Seawater was supplied to the tank at a rate more than or equal to 38 l min−1, with overflow draining through an 85 cm tall PVC pipe. A Danner Mag Drive submersible pump (113 l min−1) ran continuously, increasing water circulation. When the tank was full, simulating high tide, the irradiance shields were submerged and the anemones were under 16 cm of seawater. Low tides were created with a relay timer (Zelio SR2B121FU, Schneider Electric) programmed to open an electronic ball valve (Electromni Series 83, Asahi America) on a shorter drain pipe, dropping the water to the level of the platforms and completely exposing the anemones. Timing and duration of exposure mimicked a +0.3 m MLLW tide based on predictions from nearby Burrows Bay, WA, USA. The tank, platforms and shields were cleaned regularly to remove sediment and fouling organisms. Because anemones in the tank had limited access to their natural prey [29], they were fed 0.1 g pellets of frozen squid every other week.

The anemones were maintained in the tank for 8.5–11 months, depending on their final processing date, which was varied to maximize the chance of capturing changes in reproductive condition. All anemones were reweighed on 10 February, 20 April 2010 and on their final processing date. On 22 June, 1 August and 13 September 2010, 5–12 randomly chosen individuals from each treatment combination were processed. If an anemone had divided, the clones were kept in the same treatment and their summed weight was used in calculations representing the original anemone. Processing involved weighing the anemones, opening their pedal discs and using increasing magnification (1×, 10×, 100×) as necessary to locate gonad tissue, identify gametes and assign a gonad index from 0 (no identifiable gonad) to 5 (fully ripe or recently spawned; table 1).

Table 1.

Gonad indices of A. elegantissima held in the experimental tank. (Gonad index was evaluated by examining the dissected gonad of individuals sampled in June, August or September and determining the threshold magnification necessary to identify gonad tissue and determine sex of the anemone. Except for one zooxanthellate individual in the August sample (GI = 5), all anemones with gonads were female.)

gonad index gonad appearance magnification required
June
August
September
gonad visible sex obvious number of individuals
0 no identifiable gonad 25 28 36
1 bumps on mesenteries 100× 100× 2 3 0
2 swollen mesenteries 10× 100× 3 1 0
3 single-lobed masses 10× 10× 3 1 0
4 multi-lobed masses 10× 4 6 0
5 multiple plump masses 0 6 0
total number of individuals examined each month 37 45 36

Only anemones that maintained their original symbiotic state (119 of 176 anemones = 67%) were used in the final analyses. The symbiont changes that occurred in anemones excluded from analyses and the effects of the treatments on the symbionts themselves are described elsewhere [22]. Final symbiotic state was assessed by homogenizing the anemones and using a haemocytometer to identify and count 80–100 symbiont cells in each of four replicate homogenate subsamples (or up to 16 haemocytometer chambers if densities were low). Symbiont counts were normalized to anemone protein content determined from replicate homogenate subsamples [30]. Anemones were considered aposymbiotic if symbiont densities were less than 8 × 104 cells mg protein−1 (approx. 10% of a normal symbiont density for A. elegantissima in the nearby San Juan Islands, WA, USA [20]). All individual anemones with densities above this threshold and with less than 10% of the other symbiont were classified as either zooxanthellate or zoochlorellate and were included in the analysis.

(b). Field population

For comparison, we assessed the relationship of symbiotic state to anemone body size, fission and gonad development in a conveniently accessible field population of A. elegantissima. Anemones were collected from a southeast facing rock outcrop at Cattle Point, San Juan Island on 16 July and 11 November 2008 and on 6 February and 27 April 2009. On each date, the nearest anemone at 25 randomly chosen positions along a 25 m horizontal transect was collected, blotted dry and weighed, and then examined with a dissecting microscope for the scar on the column that persists for approximately six weeks after a fission event (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) [31]. A +0.2 m MLLW tidal height was chosen for this sampling because zoochlorellate and zooxanthellate individuals were both found at this tidal height. Gonad indices were determined for anemones collected during the fertile period (July sample only). Symbiotic state of all sampled anemones was determined as described above and anemones with mixed symbiont complements were excluded from analyses.

(c). Statistical analysis

To ensure that body size did not confound tests for treatment effects, initial weights of the anemones in different symbiotic states were compared with one-way ANOVA following a Levene's test for equal variances. Per cent weight change per month (to account for different final processing dates) and gonad index at the end of the experiment were each analysed by two-way ANOVA with irradiance (85, 43 and 2%) and symbiotic state (aposymbiotic, zooxanthellate and zoochlorellate) as fixed factors. Post hoc comparisons were carried out with Tukey tests. To correct for unequal variances, α was adjusted to 0.025 for these tests [32]. Numbers of fissions were insufficient to allow testing for combined effects of irradiance and symbiotic state, and those factors were tested individually with exact multinomial tests, followed by calculation of z-scores to determine where observed and expected values differed [33]. A discriminant analysis was used to determine whether combined measurements of per cent weight change, number of fission events and gonad index for each anemone could distinguish the nine treatment combinations (3 irradiance treatments × 3 symbiotic states). Box's M test was used to verify homogeneity of the covariance matrices and Wilks' λ was used to test for significant discrimination of the groups.

To determine whether fission was related to symbiotic state in the field population of Cattle Point anemones, a 2 × 3 contingency analysis was carried out with fission scar (present and absent) and symbiotic state (aposymbiotic, zoochlorellate and zooxanthellate) as the factors. The data from all four sampling periods were pooled to test for patterns across an entire annual cycle. Z-scores were calculated for each cell of the table to determine whether observed and expected values differed significantly.

3. Results

(a). Anemone experiment

Daily irradiance levels varied considerably during the seasonal progression of the experiment. Long days, high sun angle and clear skies increased irradiance in the tanks during the summer months (electronic supplementary material, figure S2a). Anemones in all irradiance treatments experienced similar mean, maximum and minimum temperatures from October through to February (electronic supplementary material, figure S2bd) when ambient air temperatures are typically moderate during low tides, which occur during the night. However, beginning in March, and throughout the summer when low tides occur during the day, maximum temperatures in the 85% irradiance treatment were routinely 1–2°C and 2–4°C higher than in the 43% and 2% irradiance treatments, respectively. Measured effects of treatments on the anemones therefore reflect the combined effects of irradiance and maximum temperature, as would be the case in natural habitats.

Initial body weights were independent of symbiotic state (F2,116 = 0.79, p = 0.45), averaging 2.28 ± 1.22 g (mean ± s.d.; n = 34), 2.16 ± 0.91 g (n = 40) and 2.50 ± 1.55 g (n = 45) for aposymbiotic, zoochlorellate and zooxanthellate individuals, respectively. Most anemones lost weight during the experiment, decreasing from September to February, decreasing more gradually or increasing from February to April, then diverging with no clear pattern after April (electronic supplementary material, figure S3). The most obvious effects were a rapid initial weight loss in aposymbiotic anemones exposed to 85% or 43% irradiance, and an absence of weight loss among zooxanthellate anemones in the 43% irradiance treatment. Overall weight loss was significantly affected by symbiotic state (F2,110 = 5.13, p = 0.007), but not by irradiance (F2,110 = 3.64, p = 0.029). The interaction was also non-significant (F4,110 = 1.93, p = 0.11). On average, aposymbiotic anemones lost approximately 2.5× as much weight as did zooxanthellate individuals (figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Per cent weight loss per month (n for each treatment is indicated within the bars), (b) gonad index and (c) number of A. elegantissima undergoing fission events while held in the experimental tank for 8.5–11 months (standard errors are shown for (a,b)). Horizontal bars summarize results of Tukey tests comparing symbiotic states (groups not joined by a line are significantly different).

Of the anemones sampled in June and August, 35% contained identifiable gonads (i.e. gonad indices from 1 to 5; table 1); no gonads were present in September samples. Of 29 individuals with gonads, 28 were female. The June sample included individuals with gonad states from early development (GI = 1) to near spawning (GI = 4). The August sample captured the transition from pre- to post-spawning; nine of 12 reproductive individuals (GI = 4 or 5) had ripe gonads filled with gametes while the remainder had large gonads, but few gametes, suggesting that spawning had already occurred. Symbiotic state affected gonad index (F2,110 = 5.22, p < 0.01), with greater gonad development in aposymbiotic than in zooxanthellate anemones (figure 2b). There was no significant irradiance effect (F2,110 = 1.76, p = 0.17) and no significant interaction between irradiance and symbiotic state (F4,110 = 1.17, p = 0.32).

Twelve individuals underwent fission while in the experimental tank. Strong seasonality was evident: 67% of all fissions occurred in April, May or June. An exact multinomial goodness-of-fit test showed that the number of fissions was not significantly affected by irradiance alone (p = 0.11), but did differ among symbiotic states (p = 0.05; figure 2c). Standardized residuals indicated significantly fewer divisions than expected among aposymbiotic (z = −2.38, p < 0.05) and more divisions than expected among zooxanthellate anemones (z = 4.0, p < 0.01).

The homogeneous variance assumption required for the discriminant analysis was violated (Box's M = 97.7, p < 0.01), but matrix scatterplots of the groups showed that the violation was not severe. Linear combinations of weight change, number of fissions and gonad index effectively discriminated the treatment groups (Wilks' λ = 0.60, χ2 = 56.1, p < 0.001). The first discriminant function was weighted most heavily by change in anemone weight, with smaller, and nearly equal but opposite contributions of fissions and gonad index (figure 3). The second discriminant function was heavily weighted by gonad index. The discriminant plot was divided into quadrants and labelled according to the coefficients of the functions (figure 3), producing regions qualitatively identified as sexual reproduction, highest fitness (both sexual and asexual reproduction and no weight loss), lowest fitness (little reproduction and high weight loss) and asexual reproduction.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Discriminant analysis using number of fissions, per cent weight loss and gonad index measurements to maximally separate nine treatment groups (i.e. 3 irradiance treatments × 3 symbiotic states). Each labelled point is the centroid for that treatment combination (sample sizes shown in figure 2a). Discriminant function 1 explained 74.2% of the variance, and function 2 an additional 22.0%. Coefficients of the discriminant functions (shown on the axes) were used to separate the plot into quadrants representing different fitness strategies/outcomes for A. elegantissima in the experimental tank.

Zooxanthellate anemones in 43% irradiance fell in the highest fitness quadrant, maintaining their weight while showing a high degree of fission and sexual development. Aposymbiotic anemones in 85% irradiance and zooxanthellate individuals in 2% irradiance fell in the lowest fitness quadrant. Zoochlorellate anemones in 43% and 85% irradiance, and aposymbiotic anemones in 43% and 2% irradiance showed primarily sexual reproduction. Zooxanthellate individuals in 85% irradiance and zoochlorellate individuals in 2% irradiance showed the opposite pattern: more asexual reproduction and little gonad development.

(b). Field population

The presence of fission scars was related to symbiotic state in anemones collected from Cattle Point, (Inline graphic, p = 0.003; table 2). Thirty-five per cent of zooxanthellate anemones had fission scars (nearly twice the number expected) versus 9% of the zoochlorellate and 0% of the aposymbiotic anemones. Gonad indices were also different among anemones in different symbiotic states. Of the zooxanthellate anemones, 54% were sexually mature (gonad indices of four or five), versus 20% of zoochlorellate and 0% of aposymbiotic individuals. Eighty per cent of the reproductive individuals were male (table 3). There were no significant differences in mean wet body weights of individuals in different symbiotic states (F2,83 = 2.83, p = 0.06), but the trend was towards larger size among aposymbiotic anemones: 2.4 ± 3.4 g (s.d.), 1.0 ± 1.3 g and 1.0 ± 1.6 g, respectively, for aposymbiotic, zooxanthellate and zoochlorellate individuals.

Table 2.

Presence or absence of fission scars of A. elegantissima collected from +0.2 m MLLW at Cattle Point, San Juan Island, WA, USA (pooled data for July and November 2008, and February and April 2009). (Numbers in parentheses are expected contingency table values.)

symbiotic state
aposymbiotic zoochlorellate zooxanthellate
scar 0 (2.5) 3 (6.5) 14 (7.9)a
no scar 13 (10.4) 30 (26.5) 26 (32.1)

aThe observed and expected values differ based on z-scores (p < 0.05).

Table 3.

Gonad indices of A. elegantissima collected from +0.2 m MLLW at Cattle Point, San Juan Island, WA, USA (July 2008). (Gonad index values as in table 1.)

gonad index aposymbiotic
zoochlorellate
zooxanthellate
number of individuals
0 1 3 5
1 0 0 0
2 1 (♂) 0 0
3 1 (♂) 1 (♀) 0
4 0 1 (♀) 3 (♂)
5 0 0 3 (♂)
number examined 3 5 11

4. Discussion

Compared with tropical symbioses, cnidarian–algal associations in temperate seas are generally thought to have more limited benefits for the host, particularly during the cold, dark winter months [34]. Nonetheless, the symbionts can translocate substantial portions of their phytosynthate to the host and have been hypothesized to augment the hosts' energy budget enough to boost reproductive output [3436]. Our results are, to our knowledge, the first to directly support this hypothesis and further suggest that hosting different symbionts can fundamentally change the life-history strategy of the host. Rather than simply enhancing sexual reproduction, symbiosis with the more productive S. muscatinei may promote cloning by fission, a strategy that makes A. elegantissima a highly successful spatial dominant in upper intertidal zones. Under bright, warm conditions, both in the tank experiment and at the Cattle Point field site, symbiosis with S. muscatinei was associated with more fission events, possibly at the expense of sexual reproduction. The reduced body sizes produced by cloning may be physiologically advantageous for A. elegantissima on the high shore, where a larger feeding surface area created by fission may compensate for reduced feeding opportunities resulting from shorter immersion times [27,37]. Cloning may also decrease the risk of extinction for individual genotypes in these high stress locations where clonal diversity is low and successful sexual reproduction may be infrequent [31,38]. Aggregation of cloned individuals can reduce the costs of a high surface to volume ratio associated with smaller body size by reducing air drying and causing individuals to warm more slowly during low tides [39], allowing the clone to extend outward from protected crevices onto open rock where conditions would be too harsh for isolated individuals [31]. By supporting a shift towards clonal replication, S. muscatinei may contribute critically to the abundance and persistence of A. elegantissima, and indeed itself, in upper shore habitats along much of the North American Pacific coast.

Anemones hosting E. marina generally had higher fitness than aposymbiotic individuals, suggesting that E. marina contributes to host success, possibly by facilitating sexual reproduction. This bears some similarity to Hydra viridis (green hydra), which produces female gonads only if the Chlorella algal symbiont is present [40]. Although E. marina is less tolerant of high temperature and irradiance [1719] and consistently less productive than S. muscatinei on a per-cell basis [41], the growth rate of E. marina is higher [19,21], and in habitats where irradiance and temperature are low year round, A. elegantissima commonly hosts E. marina at up to twice the density of S. muscatinei [20,28]. Thus, zoochlorellate A. elegantissima may be nearly as productive as zooxanthellate individuals under some conditions [19,28], but appear to direct more energy to sexual reproduction. Although anemones held in our experiment for many months may have experienced decreased feeding or assimilation efficiency, some of the most pronounced weight loss actually occurred among aposymbiotic anemones during the first four to five months, before mid-day, summer low tides resulted in possible thermal stress. The comparatively low rate of weight loss in symbiotic as compared with aposymbiotic individuals suggests that both S. muscatinei and E. marina contribute nutritionally to their hosts even under the low-light conditions of winter.

On sample dates falling within the reproductive period of A. elegantissima, 35% of the anemones in the tank produced gonad. This is lower than the 66% fertility reported for field populations of A. elegantissima at Tatoosh Island, but is close to the 39% fertility reported for A. elegantissima at Cattle Point by Sebens [27]. The degree of gonad development was significantly affected by symbiotic state, but not as expected. Independent of irradiance, aposymbiotic individuals in the tank produced the most gonad. However, freshly collected anemones from Cattle Point showed the reverse pattern, with the most fully developed gonad in zooxanthellate anemones. The pattern of gonad development in the field may be related to timing of gonad development among anemones in different symbiotic states, to differences in the microhabitats from which the anemones were collected or to differences in sex of the anemones (table 3). More fine-scale study of gonad development, with larger sample sizes, will be necessary to explain this result.

We obtained an average of 0.09 divisions individual−1 yr−1 among all anemones during the 8.5–11 months they were in the experimental tank. This is within the range of fissions reported for Tatoosh Island populations of A. elegantissima (0–0.3 divisions individual−1 yr−1 depending on tidal height and location) [37]. Exposure to direct sunlight increases A. elegantissima fission rate, with the most pronounced effect on zooxanthellate individuals [42]. Although this suggests that irradiance alone can affect fission, there is some interplay between irradiance and symbiotic state, as association with S. muscatinei enhanced asexual reproduction.

The comparatively low fitness of both the zooxanthellate anemones in 2% irradiance and the aposymbiotic anemones in 85% irradiance suggests a high host cost for symbiosis under low irradiance and for aposymbiosis under high irradiance. Under low irradiance, a large symbiont population can create significant respiratory demands not compensated by photosynthesis [43], and the symbionts, unable to meet their metabolic needs through photosynthesis, may instead consume host nutrients [44]. This would explain why, in our 2% irradiance treatment, anemones hosting S. muscatinei, which photosynthesizes poorly under low irradiance, showed lower fitness than anemones lacking symbionts altogether. At the other extreme, aposymbiotic anemones under high irradiance conditions were also at a disadvantage. Increased host respiration owing to elevated temperatures [17,18] may have created an energy deficit uncompensated by contributions from the symbionts, leaving less energy for growth and reproduction. This suggests that, in addition to increasing fission rates, symbiosis with S. muscatinei may offset the high metabolic costs associated with living in open, sun-exposed microhabitats.

The intertidal distributions of E. marina and S. muscatinei populations are remarkably stable over annual cycles, undergoing only minor changes in density and relative abundance despite large daily and seasonal fluctuations in the physical environment [28]. However, persistent changes in irradiance or temperature can change symbiont composition [22] or, in extreme cases, lead to bleaching [20,28,45]. Thus, shifts in symbiont dominance are likely to occur in response to climate change [28], with the more heat-tolerant zooxanthellae replacing zoochlorellae where air and seawater temperatures increase. Over the short term, this could increase anemone productivity and carbon cycling where A. elegantissima is abundant. Over the longer term, changes in the relative importance of sexual versus asexual reproduction could impact abundance, distribution, dispersal, population dynamics and genomics of this important species.

Experimental infections of the tropical anemone Aiptasia pulchella with homologous or heterologous Symbiodinium types show the fundamental impact of symbiont identity on autotrophic potential, functionality and, presumably, fitness of that species [46], and work with multiple coral species demonstrates that photosymbiont density can significantly affect tissue biomass and levels of gamete production [10,11]. Our results indicate that, in A. elegantissima, the presence and identity of the symbionts interact with environmental conditions to alter the balance between growth, asexual cloning and sexual reproduction. Such basic life-history differences undoubtedly affect the fitness of this temperate anemone host. Working to understand the biochemical and energetic mechanism driving these divergent life histories and determining whether similar changes occur in other species, are important next steps, particularly in the context of a changing global climate that may drive changes in other symbiotic partnerships.

Supplementary Material

Figure 1, 2, 3 and table 1
rspb20140548supp1.pdf (210KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We thank Vince Cook, Environmental Division Manager for the Makah Nation, and Cathy Pfister and Tim Wooton for access to the collection site on Tatoosh Island. Angela Fletcher, Terra Hiebert, Mike Levine, Monica Ponce-McDermott, Gene McKeen, Eli Patmont, Zullaylee Ramos, Nate Schwarck and Alan Verde provided laboratory or field assistance. Lisbeth Francis provided editing and helpful discussion, and assisted with gonad measurements.

Funding statement

The work was funded by NSF grant nos. IOS-0822179, OCE-0741372 and OCE-0551898.

References

  • 1.Partida-Martinez LP, Monajembashi S, Greulich KO, Hertweck C. 2007. Endosymbiont-dependent host reproduction maintains bacterial–fungal mutualism. Curr. Biol. 17, 773–777. ( 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.039) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stanley MR, Koide RT, Shumway DL. 1993. Mycorrhizal symbiosis increases growth, reproduction and recruitment of Abutilon theophrasti Medic. in the field. Oecologia 94, 30–35. ( 10.1007/BF00317297) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nuortila C, Kytöviita MM, Tuomi J. 2004. Mycorrhizal symbiosis has contrasting effects on fitness components in Campanula rotundifolia. New Phytol. 164, 543–553. ( 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01195.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Streitwolf-Engel R, Van der Heijden MGA, Wiemken A, Sanders IR. 2001. The ecological significance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal effects on clonal reproduction in plants. Ecology 82, 2846–2859. ( 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2846:TESOAM]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Norris DM, Baker JK. 1967. Symbiosis: effects of a mutualistic fungus upon the growth and reproduction of Xyleborus ferrugineus. Science 156, 1120–1122. ( 10.1126/science.156.3778.1120) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brooks MA, Richards AG. 1955. Intracellular symbiosis in cockroaches. I. Production of aposymbiotic cockroaches. Biol. Bull. 109, 22–39. ( 10.2307/1538656) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pais R, Lohs C, Wu Y, Wang J, Aksoy S. 2008. The obligate mutualist Wigglesworthia glossinidia influences reproduction, digestion, and immunity processes of its host, the tsetse fly. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5965–5974. ( 10.1128/AEM.00741-08) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Werren JH, Baldo L, Clark ME. 2008. Wolbachia: master manipulators of invertebrate biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 741–751. ( 10.1038/nrmicro1969) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Simon J-C, Boutin S, Tsuchida T, Koga R, Le Gallic J-F, Frantz A, Outreman Y. 2011. Facultative symbiont infections affect aphid reproduction. PLoS ONE 6, e21831 ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0021831) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Szmant AM, Gassman NJ. 1990. The effects of prolonged ‘bleaching’ on the tissue biomass and reproduction of the reef coral Monastrea annularis. Coral Reefs 8, 217–224. ( 10.1007/BF00265014) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Michalek-Wagner K, Willis BL. 2001. Impacts of bleaching on the soft coral Lobophytum compactum. I. Fecundity, fertilization and offspring viability. Coral Reefs 19, 231–239. ( 10.1007/s003380170003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sachs JL, Wilcox TP. 2006. A shift to parasitism in the jellyfish symbiont Symbiodinium microadriaticum. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 425–429. ( 10.1098/rspb.2005.3346) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jones AM, Berkelmans R. 2011. Tradeoffs to thermal acclimation: energetics and reproduction of a reef coral with heat tolerant Symbiodinium type-D. J. Mar. Biol. 2011, 1–12. ( 10.1155/2011/185890) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.LaJeunesse TC, Trench RK. 2000. Biogeography of two species of Symbiodinium (Freudenthal) inhabiting the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). Biol. Bull. 199, 126–134. ( 10.2307/1542872) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sanders JG, Palumbi SR. 2011. Populations of Symbiodinium muscatinei show strong biogeographic structuring in the intertidal anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Biol. Bull. 220, 199–208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Letsch MR, Muller-Parker G, Friedl T, Lewis LA. 2009. Elliptochloris marina sp. nov. (Trebouxiophyceae, Chlorophyta), symbiotic green alga of the temperate Pacific sea anemones Anthopleura xanthogrammica and A. elegantissima (Anthozoa, Cnidaria). J. Phycol. 45, 1127–1135. ( 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00727.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Verde EA, McCloskey LR. 2001. A comparative analysis of the photobiology of zooxanthellae and zoochlorellae symbiotic with the temperate clonal anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). I. Effect of temperature. Mar. Biol. 138, 477–489. ( 10.1007/s002270000490) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Verde EA, McCloskey LR. 2002. A comparative analysis of the photobiology of zooxanthellae and zoochlorellae symbiotic with the temperate clonal anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). II. Effect of light intensity. Mar. Biol. 141, 225–239. ( 10.1007/s00227-002-0824-7) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Verde EA, McCloskey LR. 2007. A comparative analysis of the photobiology of zooxanthellae and zoochlorellae symbiotic with the temperate clonal anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt). III. Seasonal effects of natural light and temperature on photosynthesis and respiration. Mar. Biol. 152, 775–792. ( 10.1007/s00227-007-0737-6) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Secord D, Muller-Parker G. 2005. Symbiont distribution along a light gradient within an intertidal cave. Limnol. Oceanogr. 50, 272–278. ( 10.4319/lo.2005.50.1.0272) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bergschneider H, Muller-Parker G. 2008. Nutritional role of two algal symbionts in the temperate sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima Brandt. Biol. Bull. 215, 73–88. ( 10.2307/25470685) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dimond JL, Bingham BL, Muller-Parker G, Oakley CA. 2013. Symbiont physiology and population dynamics before and during symbiont shifts in a flexible algal–cnidarian symbiosis. J. Phycol. 49, 1074–1083. ( 10.1111/jpy.12112) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hand C. 1955. The sea anemones of central California. Part II. The endomyarian and mesomyarian anemones. Wasmann J. Biol. 13, 37–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sebens KP. 1982. Recruitment and habitat selection in the intertidal sea anemones Anthopleura elegantissima and A. xanthogrammica. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 59, 103–124. ( 10.1016/0022-0981(82)90110-1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Fitt WK, Pardy RL, Littler MM. 1982. Photosynthesis, respiration, and contribution to community productivity of the symbiotic sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Brandt, 1835). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 61, 213–232. ( 10.1016/0022-0981(82)90070-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dingman HC. 1998. Environmental influence on algal symbiont populations in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima, pp. 92 MS thesis, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sebens KP. 1981. Reproductive ecology of the intertidal sea anemones Anthopleura xanthogrammica (Brandt) and A. elegantissima (Brandt): body size, habitat, and sexual reproduction. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 54, 225–250. ( 10.1016/0022-0981(81)90159-3) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Dimond JL, Bingham BL, Muller-Parker G, Wuesthoff K, Francis L. 2011. Seasonal stability of a flexible algal-cnidarian symbiosis in a highly variable temperate environment. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 2233–2242. ( 10.4319/lo.2011.56.6.2233) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sebens KP. 1981. The allometry of feeding, energetics, and body size in three sea anemone species. Biol. Bull. 161, 152–171. ( 10.2307/1541115) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Francis L. 1979. Contrast between solitary and clonal lifestyles in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Am. Zool. 19, 669–681. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Keppel G, Wickens TD. 2004. Design and analysis: a researcher‘s handbook. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Agresti A. 2007. An introduction to categorical data analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Muller-Parker G, Davy SK. 2001. Temperate and tropical algal–sea anemone symbioses. Invert. Biol. 120, 104–123. ( 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2001.tb00115.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Davy SK, Lucas IAN, Turner JR. 1996. Carbon budgets in temperate anthozoan–dinoflagellate symbioses. Mar. Biol. 126, 773–783. ( 10.1007/BF00351344) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Davy SK, Turner JR, Lucas IAN. 1997. The nature of temperate anthozoan–dinoflagellate symbioses. In Proc. 8th Int. Coral Reef Symp., vol. 2 (eds HA Lessios, IG Macintyre), pp. 1307–1312. Panama: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sebens KP. 1983. Population dynamics and habitat suitability of the intertidal sea anemones Anthopleura elegantissima and A. xanthogrammica. Ecol. Monogr. 53, 405–433. ( 10.2307/1942646) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shick JM, Lamb AN. 1977. Asexual reproduction and genetic population structure in the colonizing sea anemone Haliplanella luciae. Biol. Bull. 153, 604–617. ( 10.2307/1540609) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bingham BL, Freytes I, Emery M, Dimond J, Muller-Parker G. 2011. Aerial exposure and body temperature of the intertidal sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Invert. Biol. 130, 291–301. ( 10.1111/j.1744-7410.2011.00241.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Habetha M, Anton-Erxleben F, Neumann K, Bosch TC. 2003. The Hydra viridis/Chlorella symbiosis. Growth and sexual differentiation in polyps without symbionts. Zoology 106, 101–108. ( 10.1078/0944-2006-00104) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Engebretson HP, Muller-Parker G. 1999. Translocation of photosynthetic carbon from two algal symbionts to the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Biol. Bull. 197, 72–81. ( 10.2307/1542998) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Buchsbaum VM. 1968. Behavioral and physiological responses to light by the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima as related to its algal endosymbionts. Dissertation, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hoogenboom M, Beraud E, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2010. Relationship between symbiont density and photosynthetic carbon acquisition in the temperate coral Cladocora caespitosa. Coral Reefs 29, 21–29. ( 10.1007/s00338-009-0558-9) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Steen RG. 1986. Evidence for heterotrophy by zooxanthellae in symbiosis with Aiptasia pulchella. Biol. Bull. 170, 267–278. ( 10.2307/1541808) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Muller-Parker G, Pierce-Cravens J, Bingham BL. 2007. Broad thermal tolerance of the symbiotic dinoflagellate Symbiodinium muscatinei (Dinophyta) in the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima (Cnidaria) from northern latitudes. J. Phycol. 43, 25–31. ( 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00302.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Starzak DE, Quinnell RG, Nitschke MR, Davy SK. 2014. The influence of symbiont type on photosynthetic carbon flux in a model cnidarian–dinoflagellate symbiosis. Mar. Biol. 161, 711–724. ( 10.1007/s00227-013-2372-8) [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure 1, 2, 3 and table 1
rspb20140548supp1.pdf (210KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES