Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2014 Mar 4;7(5):533–542. doi: 10.1007/s12265-014-9551-y

Iron and Atherosclerosis: Nailing Down a Novel Target with Magnetic Resonance

Travis P Sharkey-Toppen 1, Arun K Tewari 1, Subha V Raman 1
PMCID: PMC4101028  NIHMSID: NIHMS572424  PMID: 24590608

Abstract

Iron is an essential mineral in many proteins and enzymes in human physiology, with limited means of iron elimination to maintain iron balance. Iron accrual incurs various pathological mechanisms linked to cardiovascular disease. In atherosclerosis, iron catalyzes the creation of reactive oxygen free radicals that contribute to lipid modification, which is essential to atheroma formation. Inflammation further fuels iron-related pathologic processes associated with plaque progression. Given iron’s role in atherosclerosis development, in vivo detection techniques sensitive iron are needed for translational studies targeting iron for earlier diagnosis and treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is uniquely able to quantify iron in human tissues noninvasively and without ionizing radiation, offering appealing for longitudinal and interventional studies. Particularly intriguing is iron’s complementary biology vs. calcium, which is readily detectable by computed tomography (CT). This review summarizes the role of iron in atherosclerosis with considerable implications for novel diagnostic and therapeutic approaches.


Atherosclerosis is a proliferative, inflammatory disease affecting the arteries. Plaque disruption and subsequent thrombosis from the exposure of plaque contents to circulating blood is the underlying cause of acute coronary syndromes and ischemic strokes. Current preventive strategies focus on management of traditional risk factors such as dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension and smoking, and current treatment strategies of more advanced disease employ mechanical relief of stenosis in conjunction with lipid-lowering, anti-platelet and anti-ischemic medications. Yet, despite significant reduction of morbidity and mortality afforded by these strategies, atherosclerosis persists as a leading cause of death worldwide [1].

Atherosclerosis may develop insidiously prior to causing clinically-apparent events like heart attack and stroke; reducing such events requires better mechanistic understanding of disease onset and progression, and improved identification and treatment of subclinical disease. The ability to detect subclinical arterial wall disease holds promise for more timely diagnosis, more effective therapies and better outcomes, particularly if based on a proven contributor to atherosclerosis that also can be measured in vivo. This review focuses on iron as both a biomarker and biomechanistic contributor to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. There is now considerable evidence supporting iron’s role in both atherosclerosis initiation and progression (Figure 1), plus recent clinical trial evidence that targeting iron excess in atherosclerosis may be beneficial. This review summarizes i) evidence supporting iron’s role in atherosclerosis from in vitro, animal model and clinical studies (Tables 1 and 2), ii) implications for earlier and more predictive diagnosis and iii) opportunities for future translational research to improve atherosclerosis death and disability by targeting this relatively underappreciated contributor to the disease.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

This schematic depicts various pathways that indicate iron’s role in atherosclerosis initiation and progression.

Table 1.

Iron and Atherosclerosis: In vitro and Animal Studies

Reference Cell/Material/Model Relevant Findings Comments
Nemeth E et al. 2004 Human embryonic
kidney 293 cells
expressing mouse
ferroportin
Hepcidin binding causes fpn to be
internalized/degraded, with
decreased export of cellular iron
As ferroportin is expressed on the surface of
macrophages, this work supports hepcidin’s
role in intra-macrophage iron accrual
Chang C et al. 2013 Hep G2 cells (produce
hepcidin)
Hepcidin mRNA expression was
reduced by simvastatin
This dose-dependent effect supports an iron
regulatory pathway-mediated pleotropic effect
of statin
Ludwiczek S et al. 2003 Human monocyte lines
(THP-1 and U937)
Ferroportin mRNA expression
down-regulated by interferon-
gamma and lipopolysaccharide
Supports mechanistic links between
inflammation and human monocyte iron uptake
Satchell L and Leake DS. 2012 Isolated human LDL Iron at pH 4.5 and 37°C (as in
lysosomes) oxidized LDL
Lysosomal iron is a candidate for catalyzing LDL
oxidation, a key step in atheroma formation;
most labile iron in cells resides in lysosomes
Saeed O et al.
2013
Apolipoprotein E
knockout mice
Suppression of hepcidin increased
cholesterol efflux from
macrophages, decreased foam cell
formation and decreased plaque
area
Showing the potential benefits of
pharmacological manipulation of iron
homeostasis in an atheroma-prone animal
supports this as an anti-atherosclerosis
therapeutic approach
Rajendran R et al. 2012 Cholesterol-fed New
Zealand White (NZW)
rabbits
Inverse correlation of spatial
distribution of iron vs. calcium in
atherosclerotic lesions
Intraplaque iron and atheroma are associated;
speculations are drawn regarding iron
accelerating vs. calcium attenuating plaque
instability
Minqin R et al. 2005 Cholesterol-fed NZW
rabbits
Reduced atheroma lesion size vs.
controls
Preclinical data supporting potential efficacy of
chelator in early atheroma development
Nagy E et al. 2010 Human atheroma, red
blood cells and
endothelial cells
Heme iron promotes and inhibition
of heme release suppresses lipid
oxidation, endothelial cytotoxicity
In vitro experiments supporting role of iron in
human atheroma lipid oxidation and potential
to attenuate atherogenesis by targeting heme
iron
Moreno P et al. 2008 Human atheroma,
haptoglobin (Hp)
genotype
Hp 2-2 genotype predicted greater
intraplaque iron in diabetics
Genetic factors associated with impaired iron
clearance may help explain greater
atherosclerosis burden in diabetes

Table 2.

Clinical Studies on Iron and Atherosclerosis

Reference Design Relevant Findings Comments
Danesh J and Appleby P. 1999 Meta-analysis of
prospective clinical
correlative studies;
N=7,800 patients
No excess risk found between
traditional blood iron levels and
coronary heart disease (CHD)
The summary of evidence is found to refute an
association between serum measures such as
ferritin, iron, and transferrin saturation and
atherosclerosis
Duffy SJ et al. 2001 Effect of single dose
iron chelator on
vasomotor function;
single center study of
28 CHD patients and
26 healthy controls
Nitric oxide–mediated, endothelium-
dependent vasodilation improved
with deferoxamine
Supportive data that in patients with CHD iron
availability contributes to impaired vasomotor
function
Zacharski L et al. 2007
(NCT00032357)
Randomized,
controlled multicenter
trial (FeAST) of
phlebotomy in 1,277
patients with
symptomatic
peripheral arterial
disease (PAD)
Phlebotomy achieved reduction in
iron stores without significant
impact on all-cause mortality
Total body iron reduction may not be effective
once atherosclerosis is advanced
Zacharski L et al. 2013 Substudy of FeAST
Trial
Phlebotomy reduced all-cause
mortality in patients on statin
therapy in parallel with ferritin
reduction but not improved lipid
levels
Pleotropic effects of statins involving iron
metabolism may explain mortality benefit that
consistently exceeds degree of lipid-lowering
Lamas GA et al. 2013
(NCT00044213)
Multicenter
randomized trial of
chelation therapy post-
myocardial infarction
(MI), N=1708
Chelation therapy produced a
modest reduction in cardiovascular
events, mainly coronary
revascularization
The study was underpowered to achieve
significance of the secondary end point of
cardiovascular death, MI, or stroke
Galesloot TE et
al. 2014
Population-based
cross-sectional study;
N=766
Increased quartiles of hepcidin
correlated with abnormal carotid
intima media thickness (C-IMT) and
ankle-brachial index (ABI) in post-
menopausal females
Supports association between hepcidin and
vascular abnormalities that correspond to early
atherosclerotic changes
Koeth RA et al. 2013 Multidimensional
mechanistic and
clinical studies
(N=2595 for event
analysis plus assays in
smaller group)
Increased red meat intake via
impaired reverse cholesterol
transport independently raised
atherosclerotic event rate
These data coupled with evidence that iron
promotes LDL oxidation make a compelling case
for reducing red meat intake to reduce
atherosclerosis

Iron Homeostasis and Its Regulation

Iron Balance

Gut absorption is the only source of input to iron balance. Both men and women shed 14 μg/kg/d of iron through epithelial sloughing [2]. In addition, premenopausal women lose the daily equivalent of 0.9 mg of iron through menses [3]. Women’s levels of ferritin rise dramatically in the fifth and sixth decades of life, typically when menopause occurs, whereas men experience their greatest increase in ferritin levels during the late teenage years [4]. Iron excess may occur via augmented dietary or supplemental intake [5], genetic disorders such as certain forms of hemochromatosis that lead to excess intestinal iron absorption [6] or transfusion-induced iron overload [7]. Iron deficiency most commonly occurs through blood loss but may also ensue from inadequate dietary intake, dietary inhibitors [8], states of increased dietary iron requirement such as pregnancy [9] or conditions such as celiac disease with abnormal gastrointestinal tract mucosa leading to iron malabsorption [10].

Transport, Storage and Regulation

Free iron ions are toxic due to their redox activity. Therefore, the vast majority of iron in the body exists in bound form. Approximately 2500 mg of iron is in erythrocyte hemoglobin, 1000 mg is bound within ferritin in specific storage tissues (e.g., liver, spleen), 170 mg is in skeletal muscle myoglobin and 3 mg circulates in the transport protein transferrin [11].

Hepcidin is primarily produced by the liver and is the key iron-regulating hormone [12-16]. Hepcidin acts by binding and downregulating ferroportin [17], the essential transmembrane protein for cellular iron export. On the surface of macrophages, ferroportin allows egress of iron. On the basolateral membrane of absorptive intestinal enterocytes, ferroportin facilitates absorption of dietary iron [18-20]. Thus, hepcidin promotes i) increased iron sequestration in macrophages and hepatocytes and ii) decreased intestinal iron absorption by enterocytes. Patient with hemochromatosis, notably due to mutations in TFR2, have extremely low hepcidin levels causing little to no iron availability in macrophages [21]. Lack of macrophage iron to promote atheroma formation could then explain their relative protection from atherosclerosis despite their iron overload status.

Hepcidin is inhibited by anemia and hypoxia, freeing iron for erythropoiesis [22]. During iron loading and inflammation, hepcidin is stimulated by an iron feedback mechanism [22-24]. A similar state is seen in anemia of chronic disease, where patients have a relative deficiency of iron because it is trapped in macrophages. Levels of circulating cytokines including interleukin-6 (IL-6), which stimulates hepcidin expression, are markedly elevated in this chronic inflammatory state [25-27]. Elevated hepcidin has also been associated with presence and number of metabolic syndrome features [28] and arterial stiffness by ankle-brachial pulse wave velocity [29]. In chronic hemodialysis patients, associations were found between hepcidin-25 levels and increased high sensitivity C-reactive protein, decreased glomerular filtration rate and presence of diabetes mellitus [30]. Galesloot et al. demonstrated after multivariable regression an association between increased quartiles of hepcidin and abnormal carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) or ankle-brachial index (ABI) in post-menopausal females; the association with ABI was also significant in men [31].

Inflammation and Iron

Macrophages

Immunologically-active macrophages are central to the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of atherosclerosis [32]. Lipid-overloaded macrophages known as foam cells are key constituents of the developing atheroma [32]. Under physiological conditions, ATP binding cassette transporter subfamily 1 (ABCA1), also known as the cholesterol efflux regulatory protein, mediates the efficient efflux of scavenged cholesterol from macrophages to lipid-poor apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I). Further efflux of cholesterol and lipidation of nascent apoA-I is mediated by ABCG1 and ABCG4 [33]. The resulting high density lipoprotein (HDL) is transported back to the liver via plasma, completing the multi-step process of reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) [34]. The upregulation of ABCA1 and ABCG1 by the administration of a bone morphogenetic protein inhibitor has been shown to decrease the formation of foam cells in atherosclerotic plaque in mice, while concurrent administration of exogenous hepcidin reverses this effect [35]. A particularly intriguing study by Koeth et al. showed that increased red meat intake raised plasma L-carnitine levels that, in turn, correlated with increased atherosclerosis events beyond traditional risk predictors[36].These data support the role of impaired RCT and iron homeostasis in mediating the effects of transporters leading to the abundance of foam cells in atherosclerotic plaque.

Iron-induced oxidative damage

Electron transfer between iron ions is essential in the transportation, use and storage of iron. Redox-active iron catalyzes the generation of free radicals capable of oxidation of other molecules and proteins such as low-density lipoprotein (LDL)[37]. This iron-catalyzed free radical production is summarized in the Haber-Weiss reaction and Fenton chemistry.

One of the main mechanisms involved in iron-induced oxidative stress is free radical formation. The redox-active ferrous form of iron (Fe2+) is primarily responsible for generating highly reactive hydroxyl radicals that, in turn, contribute to the formation of insoluble fibrin clot from modifications of soluble fibrinogen [38]. Scavenger receptors on the surface of macrophages, most notably SR-A and CD36, bind and internalize oxidized LDL (oxLDL). Endocytosed oxLDL upregulates CD36 expression by activation of PPARγ transcription factor, increasing macrophage sensitivity to oxLDL scavenging [39] but also enhancing transcription of ABCA1 for increased cholesterol efflux [40, 41]. However, oxLDL accumulated in this manner tends to become trapped in macrophages forming foam cells, consistent with a failure in the efflux mechanism. Iron-induced oxidation of LDL was recently shown to occur in the low pH environment of intra-macrophage lysosomes [42]. In showing that α-tocopherol enrichment of LDL initially increased the rate of LDL oxidation, this work also offers a mechanistic explanation for the failure of vitamin E to reduce atherosclerotic events in clinical trials.

Given the heightened atherosclerosis risk born by patients with diabetes mellitus, it is worth noting that i) increased dietary iron intake increases diabetes risk[43] and ii) haptoglobin gene variants that impair iron clearance are associated with greater intraplaque iron in diabetic patients[44]. Thus, consideration of means to reduce atherosclerotic burden by targeting iron may be particularly important for these high-risk patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Iron and Atherosclerosis

Detection of subclinical atherosclerosis typically involves imaging, noting that modalities such as stress testing are only abnormal in the face of advanced plaque producing stenosis of the arterial lumen. Catheterization-based imaging techniques like intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and other invasive approaches can certainly identify and characterize plaque. However, the costs and risks inherent to such tests limit their appeal for asymptomatic individuals seeking identification of subclinical disease to guide treatment strategies. Noninvasive arterial ultrasonography holds some appeal in detecting arterial wall thickening [45] and vasa vasorum proliferation [46]. Limited spatial imaging depth, however, limits the extent to which this modality may characterize atherosclerosis-prone vessel walls beyond the readily-accessible carotid arteries.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an established, high-resolution tool for in vivo imaging of the carotid arteries and atherosclerotic plaque using multi-contrast signal based techniques such as T1-weighted (T1w), T2-weighted (T2w), proton density and time-of-flight imaging [47-53]. Several studies have demonstrated the ability to differentiate calcification [47, 48, 54, 55], the fibrous cap [49, 50, 54-56] and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) [47, 48, 51, 55-58] on T1-weighted (T1w) images, and even the presence of intra-plaque hemorrhage (IPH) [47-49, 52-55, 59-63] by multispectral analysis of T1w and time-of-flight (TOF) images. These methods have also been successfully applied to other major arteries such as the aorta [64] and femoral arteries [65]. Beyond its enhanced ability to characterize soft tissues when compared to other imaging modalities, MRI is uniquely suited to measure iron in tissues [66-68]. The impact of MRI-based tissue iron quantification cannot be overstated: MRI-based measurement of myocardial iron content has led to a 71% reduction in mortality in patients at risk of cardiac iron overload [69]. The potential for similar impact in patients at risk of atherosclerosis via arterial iron quantification behooves consideration of the paramagnetic properties of iron that make MRI-based iron detection possible.

Paramagnetic Iron

In a magnetic field, radiofrequency energy applied at the appropriate resonant frequency causes suitable nuclei in tissues to move from their equilibrium positions; subsequent removal of such energy allows the nuclei to return to their original positions at characteristic relaxation rates. Magnetic field inhomogeneities affect the observed relaxation rates. Such inhomogeneities are defined as imperfections in the main magnetic field, chemical shifts, gradient encodings, and susceptibility differences between tissues. So the observed transverse relaxation time or T2* (T two star) is a combination of the intrinsic relaxation of the given tissue, T2, and the added dephasing effects of the inhomogeneity or T2′. This relationship is described 1/T2* = 1/T2 + 1/T2′ or 1/T2* = 1/T2 +γΔBinhomogeneity, where γ is the gyromagnetic ratio and ΔBinhomogeneity is the magnetic field inhomogeneity present in the observed voxel [70].

Of particular interest to the study of tissue iron content using MRI are the inhomogeneities caused by the positive magnetic susceptibility of iron. Dependent on its quantity and configuration, iron is considered paramagnetic, superparamagnetic or even ferromagnetic. At normal body temperatures, ferritin is paramagnetic with a susceptibility of 1.6 × 10−6 m3 / kgFe [71]. This means that when magnetized such as during an MRI, iron deposits will form their own local magnetic field, thus contributing to the observed changes in the overall B field, ΔBinhomogeneity. Compare this to most tissues in the body made up mostly of water with a negative susceptibility or even other trace metals such as calcium which are slightly positive and effect a negligible susceptibility difference [72]. The result is that at longer echo times, images generated by a gradient echo MRI technique will have more rapidly decaying signal anywhere iron is clustered. The resulting hypointense areas can be appreciated qualitatively, or T2* at a specific tissue location (e.g. myocardium, liver, arterial wall) may be estimated by fitting the signal decay over multiple echoes at that location [67, 73].

Endogenous Iron Imaging

T2* quantification captures local magnetic field inhomogeneity that, in biologic tissues, is most significantly affected by iron. This has primarily been used to date for accurate estimate of tissue iron content in the liver and myocardium [66-68] with Kirk et al. showing an interstudy reproducibility (expressed as the coefficient of variation) of 5.8% and 5.9%, respectively [74]. Although, our group and others [75] have documented the presence of iron in atherosclerotic plaques (Figure 2). In carotid atherosclerosis disease, our group has refined this technique to show that intraplaque T2* quantification reflects micro-hemorrhage and iron deposition, with more abnormal T2* found in patients with symptom-producing plaques [76] (Figure 3). We are unaware if these techniques have been applied to peripheral artery disease (PAD) or aortic atherosclerotic plaques, but it would be reasonable to expect similar results in relatively superficial vessels with PAD like the superficial femoral artery or in large enough plaques of the aorta.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Low power light microscopy of an autopsy human coronary artery section stained with Prussian blue. Note the near-circumferential staining indicating the presence of iron in the arterial wall.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can, without the need for exogenous contrast agent, quantify tissue iron content using a technique called T2* mapping. This is based on the exponential signal intensity decay over subsequently longer echo times (TE) that occurs more rapidly in tissues with increased iron. Shown are MRI images acquired in an orthogonal plane through an atherosclerotic internal carotid artery (ICA) at serial TEs from which intraplaque T2* can be calculated. ECA = external carotid artery, V = vertebral artery, J = jugular vein. Reproduced with permission from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging.

Exogenous Iron Imaging

Arterial wall T2* quantification has also been used to quantify macrophage uptake of ultra-small paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast media to measure inflammatory burden in atherosclerotic disease [77] and response to statin therapy [78]. This contrast takes advantage of the iron sequestration of macrophages, which is enhanced during inflammation by the up regulation of divalent metal transporter-1 (DMT-1) expression by interferon-γ [26, 79, 80].

Iron vs. Calcium in Atherosclerosis

Given that calcification is a prevalent component of atherosclerotic plaque plus the ease and high resolution of computed tomography (CT) for in vivo imaging of arterial calcification, calcium imaging has garnered widespread acceptance as a means for noninvasive atherosclerosis detection [81-83]. CT performs well in quantifying calcium even in the coronary arteries, and the coronary calcium score has consistently performed well in longitudinal studies of cardiovascular event risk [84, 85]. However, individual plaques have been shown to be more likely to cause events if they are noncalcified vs. calcified [86]. Rajendran et al. in a rabbit model of atherosclerosis offer some insight as to why iron vs. calcium may help explain this apparent paradox [87]. With meticulous mapping of plaque sections using various ion beam techniques, they found an inverse relationship in the distributions of iron and calcium. When interpreted in the context of observational studies in patients, these intriguing data suggest that calcium may defend against plaque destabilization by excluding intra-lesion iron that is more likely to contribute to event-producing plaque disruption.

Further translational studies are needed to prove that iron, not calcium, is responsible for plaque destabilization in humans, and MRI is an appealing technique to generate the necessary evidence. Calcifications within atherosclerotic plaque appear as hypointense areas on T2-weighted imaging. Other MRI methods of differentiation calcium from iron include ultrashort echo time gradient echo imaging [88] and susceptibility weighted imaging that has already been used to differentiate iron and calcium within the brain [89]. The noninvasive nature of MRI, lack of exposure of human subjects to ionizing radiation and the intrinsic signal of iron that allows MRI-based detection without exogenous contrast administration make MRI an appealing translational approach to further elucidate iron’s role in human atherogenesis and plaque progression.

Current Guidelines

The ultimate clinical impact of MRI-based plaque iron quantification requires demonstration of incremental value over current atherosclerosis management. In this section, we focus on the carotid atherosclerosis to illustrate current guidelines for diagnosis and management.

Diagnosis

Carotid auscultation affords bedside detection of carotid artery atherosclerosis that produces turbulent flow, which may be minimal in the absence of significant stenosis or in the setting of critical stenosis. Ultrasonography (US) has sufficient sensitivity to measure the combined thickness of the intima and media of the arterial wall, and C-IMT has gained some acceptance as a suitable biomarker of subclinical disease in asymptomatic adults at intermediate risk of atherosclerosis [90]. Despite known limitations in measurement accuracy and reliability [91, 92], clinical trials have relied on C-IMT as an outcome measure [93].

There is greater consensus regarding the use of carotid US in patients with known or suspected carotid stenosis [94], which is advocated for asymptomatic patients with significant risk factors, symptomatic atherosclerotic disease in other arterial segments or other to evaluate a bruit detected by auscultation. US may indicate significant stenosis by either direct visualization of a narrowed lumen or by demonstration of flow acceleration through a stenotic site [95]. Noninvasive angiographic techniques including magnetic resonance (MRA), computed tomography (CTA) and invasive catheter angiography are available when i) US findings are equivocal or nondiagnostic or ii) intervention for carotid stenosis is being planned.

Treatment

Just as diagnostic techniques focus on detecting presence and severity of carotid artery stenosis, treatment algorithms focus on percent luminal stenosis in addition to the usual recommendations for risk factor management. Notably, presence or absence of symptoms attributable to internal carotid artery (ICA) disease dictates the stenosis threshold for intervention. Revascularization, which encompasses surgical carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting, is advised for symptomatic patients with >70% stenosis by noninvasive imaging or >50% ICA stenosis by invasive angiography, and is deemed ‘reasonable’ for asymptomatic patients with >70% stenosis of the ICA [94]. The benefit of CEA is significant for patients who survive the 30-day perioperative period (underscoring the need to have such procedures done at centers where the perioperative stroke and mortality rate is <6%) and realize a relatively low risk of ipsilateral stroke of 0.5 to 1.1% per year.

Limitations of Current Approaches

Current diagnostic modalities such as duplex ultrasonography, CTA, MRA and catheter angiography perform well in identifying stenotic carotid artery disease, and considerable stroke risk reduction is realized for appropriate patients with high-grade luminal stenosis who undergo revascularization. However, these techniques do not address the composition of plaque that has been shown to predict likelihood of subsequent events [96]. Prospective studies of asymptomatic patients with mildly stenotic (50-79%) carotid plaques showed the presence of intraplaque hemorrhage, thin fibrous cap, large LRNC and maximal wall thickness on MRI were all significantly correlated with subsequent cerebrovascular events [96]. Retrospective studies of ruptured plaques that produced acute coronary events have shown that 78% of culprit lesions had <70% luminal stenosis, falling below current threshholds for revascularization had the plaque been detected prior to the clinical event [97].

Translational Approaches Advancing Iron’s Role in Atherosclerosis

Given considerable mechanistic and observational data supporting iron’s role in atherosclerosis, several groups have assessed the effect on iron by existing anti-atherosclerotic therapies or novel approaches that target iron.

Statin therapy

While lipid-lowering therapy is already recommended for all patients with extra cranial carotid atherosclerosis to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol below 100 mg/dL [94], there is evidence to suggest that the pleiotropic effects of statins impact iron metabolism. In particular, statin therapy appears to downregulate hepcidin, leading to decreased degradation of ferroportin and increased efflux of iron from macrophages [98]. Zacharski et al., whose randomized trial of iron reduction via phlebotomy in patients with established peripheral arterial disease showed variable impact on outcomes in all patients[99], recently published secondary outcome results focused on statin therapy [100]. In this analysis, reduction in all-cause mortality with statins paralleled lowering of ferritin levels but not improvement in lipid profiles.

Chelation

The chelating agent deferoxamine (DFO) has been shown to reduce lesion size in atheroma-prone rabbits [101] and improve endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with coronary artery atherosclerosis [102]. The recently published Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study design the impact of intravenous disodium EDTA in patients with a history of myocardial infarction[103]. In this population with established coronary atherosclerosis, chelation demonstrated a modest reduction in risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Other potential therapeutic targets

Heme-oxygenase-1 (HO-1) has been shown to play an important role in preventing vascular inflammation. In response to pro-atherogenic signals, HO-1 expression is increased leading to release of ferrous iron from heme. Given its known antioxidant, anti-apoptotic, anti-proliferative properties, HO-1 is being investigated as a novel therapeutic target in atherosclerosis [104]. Increased levels of hepcidin results in iron sequestration in macrophages, making it readily available for lipid peroxidation. Availability of anti-hepcidin antibodies [105] should facilitate further development of anti-atherogenic approaches targeting hepcidin’s interactions with iron and macrophages in the plaque microenvironment.

Future Directions

Considerable evidence has accrued supporting iron as a mechanistic contributor to this disease, and unique aspects of iron’s biology in tissues make it appealing as both a diagnostic and therapeutic target. While older epidemiological studies failed to find an association between conventional blood iron levels and atherosclerotic events[106], contemporary approaches incorporating more refined measures do support a connection between iron homeostasis and atherosclerosis that is consistent with the accruing mechanistic evidence. Efficient pharmacological manipulation of iron homeostasis requires careful consideration of the essential role that iron plays in a considerable number of physiological pathways while recognizing opportunities to influence iron’s pathologic role in atherogenic processes. As atherosclerosis remains a leading cause of death and disability, further translational studies evaluating iron and atherosclerosis are warranted.

Acknowledgments

Grant support: 5R01HL95563 (SVR)

Relationships with Industry: Siemens (SVR)

Literature Cited

  • 1.World Health Organization . World Health Statistics. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Green R, et al. Body iron excretion in man: a collaborative study. Am J Med. 1968;45(3):336–53. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(68)90069-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hallberg L, et al. Menstrual blood loss--a population study. Variation at different ages and attempts to define normality. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1966;45(3):320–51. doi: 10.3109/00016346609158455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zacharski LR, et al. Association of age, sex, and race with body iron stores in adults: analysis of NHANES III data. Am Heart J. 2000;140(1):98–104. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2000.106646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zotter H, et al. Abnormally high serum ferritin levels among professional road cyclists. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38(6):704–8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.006635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lynch SR, Skikne BS, Cook JD. Food iron absorption in idiopathic hemochromatosis. Blood. 1989;74(6):2187–93. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siddique A, Kowdley KV. Review article: the iron overload syndromes. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(8):876–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05051.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fleming DJ, et al. Dietary determinants of iron stores in a free-living elderly population: The Framingham Heart Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67(4):722–33. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/67.4.722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Milman N. Iron and pregnancy--a delicate balance. Ann Hematol. 2006;85(9):559–65. doi: 10.1007/s00277-006-0108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bardella MT, et al. Gluten intolerance: gender- and age-related differences in symptoms. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40(1):15–9. doi: 10.1080/00365520410008169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Schenck JF. Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole-body four-tesla magnetic fields during MRI. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992;649:285–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1992.tb49617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hentze MW, Muckenthaler MU, Andrews NC. Balancing acts: molecular control of mammalian iron metabolism. Cell. 2004;117(3):285–97. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00343-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ahmad KA, et al. Decreased liver hepcidin expression in the Hfe knockout mouse. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2002;29(3):361–6. doi: 10.1006/bcmd.2002.0575. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Nicolas G, et al. Severe iron deficiency anemia in transgenic mice expressing liver hepcidin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(7):4596–601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.072632499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Park CH, et al. Hepcidin, a urinary antimicrobial peptide synthesized in the liver. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(11):7806–10. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008922200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pigeon C, et al. A new mouse liver-specific gene, encoding a protein homologous to human antimicrobial peptide hepcidin, is overexpressed during iron overload. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(11):7811–9. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008923200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Nemeth E, et al. Hepcidin regulates cellular iron efflux by binding to ferroportin and inducing its internalization. Science. 2004;306(5704):2090–3. doi: 10.1126/science.1104742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Abboud S, Haile DJ. A novel mammalian iron-regulated protein involved in intracellular iron metabolism. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(26):19906–12. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M000713200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Donovan A, et al. Positional cloning of zebrafish ferroportin1 identifies a conserved vertebrate iron exporter. Nature. 2000;403(6771):776–81. doi: 10.1038/35001596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McKie AT, et al. A novel duodenal iron-regulated transporter, IREG1, implicated in the basolateral transfer of iron to the circulation. Mol Cell. 2000;5(2):299–309. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80425-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ganz T, Nemeth E. Hepcidin and disorders of iron metabolism. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:347–60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-050109-142444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nicolas G, et al. The gene encoding the iron regulatory peptide hepcidin is regulated by anemia, hypoxia, and inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2002;110(7):1037–44. doi: 10.1172/JCI15686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Milward EA, et al. Is HFE involved in increased hepcidin expression and hypoferremia in inflammation and anemia of chronic disease? Hepatology. 2005;41(4):936–8. doi: 10.1002/hep.20652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nemeth E, et al. IL-6 mediates hypoferremia of inflammation by inducing the synthesis of the iron regulatory hormone hepcidin. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(9):1271–6. doi: 10.1172/JCI20945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Andrews NC. Anemia of inflammation: the cytokine-hepcidin link. J Clin Invest. 2004;113(9):1251–3. doi: 10.1172/JCI21441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Theurl I, et al. Regulation of iron homeostasis in anemia of chronic disease and iron deficiency anemia: diagnostic and therapeutic implications. Blood. 2009;113(21):5277–86. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-195651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Weiss G, Goodnough LT. Anemia of chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):1011–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Martinelli N, et al. Increased serum hepcidin levels in subjects with the metabolic syndrome: a population study. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e48250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kuragano T, et al. Hepcidin as well as TNF-alpha are significant predictors of arterial stiffness in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26(8):2663–7. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.van der Weerd NC, et al. Hepcidin-25 in chronic hemodialysis patients is related to residual kidney function and not to treatment with erythropoiesis stimulating agents. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e39783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Galesloot TE, et al. Serum Hepcidin Is Associated With Presence of Plaque in Postmenopausal Women of a General Population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013 doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.113.302381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hansson GK. Atherosclerosis--an immune disease: The Anitschkov Lecture 2007. Atherosclerosis. 2009;202(1):2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Vaughan AM, Oram JF. ABCA1 and ABCG1 or ABCG4 act sequentially to remove cellular cholesterol and generate cholesterol-rich HDL. J Lipid Res. 2006;47(11):2433–43. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600218-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Tall AR. An overview of reverse cholesterol transport. Eur Heart J. 1998;19(Suppl A):A31–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saeed O, et al. Pharmacological suppression of hepcidin increases macrophage cholesterol efflux and reduces foam cell formation and atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(2):299–307. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.240101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Koeth RA, et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat Med. 2013 Apr 7; doi: 10.1038/nm.3145. doi: 10.1038/nm.3145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nagy E, et al. Red cells, hemoglobin, heme, iron, and atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(7):1347–53. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.110.206433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lipinski B, Pretorius E. Hydroxyl radical-modified fibrinogen as a marker of thrombosis: the role of iron. Hematology. 2012;17(4):241–7. doi: 10.1179/1607845412Y.0000000004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shiffman D, et al. Large scale gene expression analysis of cholesterol-loaded macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(48):37324–32. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004732200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chawla A, et al. A PPAR gamma-LXR-ABCA1 pathway in macrophages is involved in cholesterol efflux and atherogenesis. Mol Cell. 2001;7(1):161–71. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chinetti G, et al. PPAR-alpha and PPAR-gamma activators induce cholesterol removal from human macrophage foam cells through stimulation of the ABCA1 pathway. Nat Med. 2001;7(1):53–8. doi: 10.1038/83348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Satchell L, Leake DS. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein by iron at lysosomal pH: implications for atherosclerosis. Biochemistry. 2012;51(18):3767–75. doi: 10.1021/bi2017975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bao W, et al. Dietary iron intake, body iron stores, and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 2012;10:119. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Moreno PR, et al. Haptoglobin genotype is a major determinant of the amount of iron in the human atherosclerotic plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(13):1049–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pignoli P, et al. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: a direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation. 1986;74(6):1399–406. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.74.6.1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Staub D, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of the vasa vasorum: from early atherosclerosis to the identification of unstable plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(7):761–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cappendijk VC, et al. Assessment of human atherosclerotic carotid plaque components with multisequence MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;234(2):487–92. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2342032101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Puppini G, et al. Characterisation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and histology. Radiol Med. 2006;111(7):921–30. doi: 10.1007/s11547-006-0091-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Albuquerque LC, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage assessed by high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging and C-reactive protein in carotid atherosclerosis. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(6):1130–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mitsumori LM, et al. In vivo accuracy of multisequence MR imaging for identifying unstable fibrous caps in advanced human carotid plaques. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17(4):410–20. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Young VE, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of lipid-rich necrotic core in carotid atheroma in vivo. Neuroradiology. 2010;52(10):929–36. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0680-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Moody AR, et al. Characterization of complicated carotid plaque with magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with cerebral ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107(24):3047–52. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074222.61572.44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Qiao Y, et al. Identification of intraplaque hemorrhage on MR angiography images: a comparison of contrast-enhanced mask and time-of-flight techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2011;32(3):454–9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Cai JM, et al. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2002;106(11):1368–73. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000028591.44554.f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Saam T, et al. Quantitative evaluation of carotid plaque composition by in vivo MRI. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(1):234–9. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000149867.61851.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hatsukami TS, et al. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000;102(9):959–64. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.9.959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Cappendijk VC, et al. Comparison of lipid-rich necrotic core size in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid atherosclerotic plaque: Initial results. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(6):1356–61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Yuan C, et al. In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques. Circulation. 2001;104(17):2051–6. doi: 10.1161/hc4201.097839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bitar R, et al. In vivo 3D high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of intraplaque hemorrhage. Radiology. 2008;249(1):259–67. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2491071517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Chu B, et al. Hemorrhage in the atherosclerotic carotid plaque: a high-resolution MRI study. Stroke. 2004;35(5):1079–84. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000125856.25309.86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kampschulte A, et al. Differentiation of intraplaque versus juxtaluminal hemorrhage/thrombus in advanced human carotid atherosclerotic lesions by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004;110(20):3239–44. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000147287.23741.9A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ota H, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-T MR imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three T1-weighted sequences. Radiology. 2010;254(2):551–63. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Yim YJ, et al. High signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on maximum intensity projection images of time-of-flight MR angiography: a new sign for intraplaque hemorrhage. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;27(6):1341–6. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lima JA, et al. Statin-induced cholesterol lowering and plaque regression after 6 months of magnetic resonance imaging-monitored therapy. Circulation. 2004;110(16):2336–41. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145170.22652.51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.West AM, et al. Low-density lipoprotein lowering does not improve calf muscle perfusion, energetics, or exercise performance in peripheral arterial disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(10):1068–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Anderson LJ, et al. Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J. 2001;22(23):2171–9. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Tanner MA, et al. Multi-center validation of the transferability of the magnetic resonance T2* technique for the quantification of tissue iron. Haematologica. 2006;91(10):1388–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Westwood M, et al. A single breath-hold multiecho T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance technique for diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18(1):33–9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Modell B, et al. Improved survival of thalassaemia major in the UK and relation to T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:42. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-10-42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Chavhan GB, et al. Principles, techniques, and applications of T2*-based MR imaging and its special applications. Radiographics. 2009;29(5):1433–49. doi: 10.1148/rg.295095034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Shoden A, Sturgeon P. Hemosiderin. Acta Haematologica. 1960;23(6):376–392. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Diamagnetic Susceptibility of Organic Compounds, Oils, Paraffins and Polyethylenes. Springer; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Sharkey-Toppen TP, et al. Improved in vivo human carotid artery wall T(2) estimation. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31(1):44–52. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kirk P, et al. International reproducibility of single breathhold T2* MR for cardiac and liver iron assessment among five thalassemia centers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32(2):315–9. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Kolodgie FD, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and progression of coronary atheroma. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(24):2316–25. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Raman SV, et al. In vivo atherosclerotic plaque characterization using magnetic susceptibility distinguishes symptom-producing plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(1):49–57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2007.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Howarth SP, et al. In vivo positive contrast IRON sequence and quantitative T(2)* measurement confirms inflammatory burden in a patient with asymptomatic carotid atheroma after USPIO-enhanced MR imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2008;19(3):446–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Patterson AJ, et al. In vivo carotid plaque MRI using quantitative T2* measurements with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles: a dose-response study to statin therapy. NMR Biomed. 2011;24(1):89–95. doi: 10.1002/nbm.1560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ludwiczek S, et al. Cytokine-mediated regulation of iron transport in human monocytic cells. Blood. 2003;101(10):4148–54. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-08-2459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Recalcati S, et al. Response of monocyte iron regulatory protein activity to inflammation: abnormal behavior in genetic hemochromatosis. Blood. 1998;91(7):2565–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Schroeder S, et al. Noninvasive detection and evaluation of atherosclerotic coronary plaques with multislice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1430–5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01115-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Papadopoulou SL, et al. Detection and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaque by 64-slice multidetector CT: a systematic head-to-head comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219(1):163–70. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Voros S, et al. Coronary atherosclerosis imaging by coronary CT angiography: current status, correlation with intravascular interrogation and meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(5):537–48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Pletcher MJ, et al. Interpretation of the coronary artery calcium score in combination with conventional cardiovascular risk factors: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Circulation. 2013;128(10):1076–84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Polonsky TS, et al. Coronary artery calcium score and risk classification for coronary heart disease prediction. JAMA. 2010;303(16):1610–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Hoffmann U, et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(8):1655–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.01.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Rajendran R, et al. Does iron inhibit calcification during atherosclerosis? Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53(9):1675–9. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.07.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Karolyi M, et al. Classification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques ex vivo with T1, T2, and ultrashort echo time CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(4):466–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Wu Z, et al. Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(1):177–82. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Greenland P, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(25):e50–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mani V, et al. Carotid black blood MRI burden of atherosclerotic disease assessment correlates with ultrasound intima-media thickness. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(3):529–34. doi: 10.1080/10976640600675245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Baldassarre D, et al. Carotid intima-media thickness and markers of inflammation, endothelial damage and hemostasis. Ann Med. 2008;40(1):21–44. doi: 10.1080/07853890701645399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kastelein JJ, et al. Simvastatin with or without ezetimibe in familial hypercholesterolemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(14):1431–43. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Brott TG, et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery Developed in Collaboration With the American Academy of Neurology and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(8):1002–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Gerhard-Herman M, et al. Guidelines for noninvasive vascular laboratory testing: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology. Vasc Med. 2006;11(3):183–200. doi: 10.1177/1358863x06070516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Takaya N, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and subsequent ischemic cerebrovascular events: a prospective assessment with MRI--initial results. Stroke. 2006;37(3):818–23. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000204638.91099.91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Giroud D, et al. Relation of the site of acute myocardial infarction to the most severe coronary arterial stenosis at prior angiography. Am J Cardiol. 1992;69(8):729–32. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(92)90495-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Chang CC, et al. Simvastatin downregulates the expression of hepcidin and erythropoietin in HepG2 cells. Hemodial Int. 2013;17(1):116–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-4758.2012.00716.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zacharski LR, et al. Reduction of iron stores and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2007;297(6):603–10. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.6.603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Zacharski LR, et al. The statin-iron nexus: anti-inflammatory intervention for arterial disease prevention. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(4):e105–12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Minqin R, et al. The iron chelator desferrioxamine inhibits atherosclerotic lesion development and decreases lesion iron concentrations in the cholesterol-fed rabbit. Free Radic Biol Med. 2005;38(9):1206–11. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Duffy SJ, et al. Iron chelation improves endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2001;103(23):2799–804. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.23.2799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Lamas GA, et al. Effect of disodium EDTA chelation regimen on cardiovascular events in patients with previous myocardial infarction: the TACT randomized trial. JAMA. 2013;309(12):1241–50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.2107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Araujo JA, Zhang M, Yin F. Heme oxygenase-1, oxidation, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:119. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2012.00119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Cooke KS, et al. A fully human anti-hepcidin antibody modulates iron metabolism in both mice and nonhuman primates. Blood. 2013;122(17):3054–61. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-505792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Danesh J, Appleby P. Coronary heart disease and iron status: meta-analyses of prospective studies. Circulation. 1999;99(7):852–4. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.99.7.852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES