Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: Sci Total Environ. 2014 May 3;487:173–186. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.131

PAHs (Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons), Nitro-PAHs, Hopanes and Steranes Biomarkers in Sediments of Southern Lake Michigan, USA

Lei Huang 1, Sergei M Chernyak 1, Stuart A Batterman 1,*
PMCID: PMC4101084  NIHMSID: NIHMS583177  PMID: 24784742

Abstract

PAHs in the Great Lakes basin are of concern due to their toxicity and persistence in bottom sediments. Their nitro derivatives, nitro-PAHs (NPAHs), which can have stronger carcinogenic and mutagenic activity than parent PAHs, may follow similar transport routes and also are accumulated in sediments. Limited information exists regarding the current distribution, trends and loadings of these compounds, especially NPAHs, in Lake Michigan sediments. This study characterizes PAHs, NPAHs, and biomarkers steranes and hopanes in surface sediments collected at 24 offshore sites in southern Lake Michigan. The ΣPAH14 (sum of 14 compounds) ranged from 213 to 1291 ng/g dry weight (dw) across the sites, levels that are 2 to 10 times lower than those reported 20 to 30 years earlier. Compared to consensus-based sediment quality guidelines, PAH concentrations suggest very low risk to benthic organisms. The ΣNPAH5 concentration ranged from 2.9 to 18.6 ng/g dw, and included carcinogenic compounds 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene. ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 concentrations ranged from 6.2 to 36 and 98 to 355 ng/g dw, respectively. Based on these concentrations, Lake Michigan is approximately receiving 11, 0.16, 0.25 and 3.6 metric tons per year (t/yr) of ΣPAH14, ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5, respectively. Maps of OC-adjusted concentrations display that concentrations decline with increasing off-shore distance. The major sources of PAHs and NPAHs are pyrogenic in nature, based on diagnostic ratios. Using chemical mass balance models, sources were apportioned to emissions from diesel engines (56±18%), coal power plants (27±14%), coal-tar pavement sealants (16±11%), and coke ovens (7±12%). The biomarkers identify a combination of petrogenic and biogenic sources, with the southern end of the lake more impacted by petroleum. This first report of NPAHs levels in sediments of Lake Michigan reveals several carcinogenic compounds at modest concentrations, and a need for further work to assess potential risks to aquatic organisms.

Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitro-PAHs (NPAHs), hopanes, steranes, sediment, Great Lakes

1. Introduction

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a group of widely distributed and persistent organic pollutants that include a number of carcinogenic compounds (ATSDR, 1995). There are three major types of PAH sources: pyrogenic PAHs that are emitted during incomplete burning of coal, oil, gas, coke, wood, garbage, or other organic matterial; petrogenic PAHs that form in the earth by geological processes at low temperature, possibly high pressure and over long time periods that are the basis for crude oil, coal, coal tar pitch, and asphalts; and diagenetic PAHs that are derived from biogenic precursors like plant terpenes and in sediments (Crane et al., 2010). Most PAHs are pyrogenic in origin and are released into the atmosphere (Baek et al., 1991; Neff, 1979). Inputs to aquatic environments arise from atmospheric deposition, urban stormwater runoff and municipal/industrial effluents (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). Petroleum spills may be a significant PAH source in certain locations (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). Recently, coal-tar pavement sealants have been identified as an important source of PAHs in urban waterways, especially in central and eastern U.S. (Van Metre and Mahler, 2010). Sealed pavements also emit PAHs by volatilization to urban air (Van Metre et al., 2012).

The presence of PAHs in the Great Lakes has been of concern for decades (EPA, 1994; EPA, 2000; EPA&EC, 2004; Sun et al., 2006a; Sun et al., 2006b). The Lakes’ large surface areas increase atmospheric deposition (Simcik et al., 1999), and the long hydrologic retention times and great depths increase their sensitivity to inputs (De Vault et al., 1996). Lake Michigan receives large inputs of PAHs from atmospheric deposition, urban runoff and municipal/industrial effluents due to the large urban and industrial centers that surround its southern portion (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). The Lake also receives inputs from petroleum spills given that Indiana Harbor, Indiana and Chicago, Illinois are major distribution centers for petroleum products (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). In 1980, the cumulative loadings of PAH from these sources was estimated to be 50 to 55 metric tons/year (MT/yr), which included 40 MT/yr from atmospheric deposition (based on measured ΣPAH12 concentrations in air and dry and wet deposition rates) (Andren and Strand, 1979), 0.8 to 8 MT/yr from urban runoff/municipal effluent (based on measured ΣPAH22 concentrations in sewage discharge and combined runoff/effluent flows) (Kveseth et al., 1982), and 5 to 7.5 MT/yr from commercial and private vessels and petroleum spills (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). PAHs in Lake Michigan sediments have been characterized in several major studies conducted in the 1980s and 1990s (Eadie et al., 1982; Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986; Simcik et al., 1996). Surface sediment accumulation rates for ΣPAH17 were estimated to be 50–70 ng/cm2-yr in 1991–1993 (Simcik et al., 1996). While recent declines in PAH levels have been observed in sediment cores from Grand Traverse Bay, Lake Michigan (Schneider et al., 2001), only two studies (Eadie et al., 1982; Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986) have reported PAH levels in sediments in the Lake’s southern basin, the area closest to the source areas around Chicago, Illinois and Gary, Indiana where levels are likely to be highest. Several studies have examined sediments in Areas of Concern (AOC) of southern Lake Michigan, including Grand Calumet, Waukegan Harbor, Milwaukee Estuary, and Muskegon Lake (Ghosh et al., 2003; Kannan et al., 2001; Kemble et al., 2000; Li et al., 2003; MacDonald et al., 2002). The National Coastal Condition Assessment (NCCA) project is planning to analyze near-shore sediments from the Great Lakes for 25 PAHs (EPA, 2010). However, studies on open water sediments have not been carried out since the 1980s. Thus, assessment of current PAH levels in open lake sediments is needed to understand contaminant trends and the potential for environmental risks.

Nitro-PAHs (NPAHs), which are nitrated PAHs, have diverse properties like their parent PAH compounds. As derivatives of PAHs, NPAHs have been found in similar environmental compartments as PAHs (Ozaki et al., 2010; Perrini et al., 2005). They result from direct emissions from combustion sources as well as atmospheric transformations of PAHs (Perrini et al., 2005; Yaffe et al., 2001). Airborne NPAHs also can enter aquatic environments through atmospheric deposition and urban runoff (Ozaki et al., 2010). Although concentrations are far lower than levels of parent PAHs (Albinet et al., 2007; Khalek et al., 2011; Ozaki et al., 2010), NPAHs can have stronger carcinogenic and mutagenic activity (Schantz et al., 2001). Several NPAHs are direct-acting mutagens, e.g., dinitropyrene in diesel particulate matter (Perrini et al., 2005). Although the behavior of NPAHs in the atmosphere has been extensively studied (Albinet et al., 2007; de Castro Vasconcellos et al., 2008; Hayakawa et al., 2002; Librando and Fazzino, 1993), few studies have investigated the occurrence of NPAHs in aquatic environments. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) measured PAHs and NPAHs in urban stormwater pond sediments (Crane et al., 2010). While NPAHs were not detected in pond stations in the Twin Cities, MN, metropolitan area (Crane, 2014), NPAHs including 2-nitrofluorene, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene were detected at ppb to ppm levels in Varney Pond, White Bear Lake, MN (MDH, 2011). In Europe, NPAHs including nitronaphthalenes, 9-nitronaphthalene, 1-nitropyrene, 6-nitrochrysene and dinitropyrenes have been found at ppb levels in sediments from the Elbe River basin, Germany and Czech Republic (Lübcke-von Varel et al., 2012; Lubcke-von Varel et al., 2011). In sediments of the Suimon River, Japan, 1-nitropyrene and 2-nitrofulorene were measured at ppb levels (Sato et al., 1985). In marine (coastal) sediments collected off Barcelona, Spain, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene were found to contribute to the mutagenic activity (Fernandez et al., 1992), and NPAHs in the Hiroshima Bay Area, Japan, were found at concentrations up to 30 ng/g (2-nitrofluoranthene) (Ozaki et al., 2010). No information has been located regarding NPAHs in Great Lakes sediments.

Hopanes and steranes are two additional classes of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs). These compounds are derived from the cell membranes of prokaryotes (Ourisson and Rohmer, 1992; Ourisson et al., 1987) and eukaryotes (Mackenzie et al., 1982), respectively, and are common constituents of crude oil (Manan et al., 2011). Petrogenic (crude oil and derived products) and biogenic sources (vascular plants, algae, bacteria) tend to have distinct hopane and sterane profiles (Bieger et al., 1996). As examples, ββ-hopane configuration is biogenic; αβ-hopane configuration is thermodynamically stable and dominates in petroleum; the mono-unsaturated hopanes (e.g., C30-hopenes) are also biogenic; and there are indicators of thermal maturity that utilize the ratios between isomers or diastereomers (Boitsov et al., 2011; Qu et al., 2007). Because these compounds are resistant to chemical, photochemical and microbial degradation (Manan et al., 2011; Neff and Durell, 2012), hopanes and steranes have been used as signature or marker compounds to help identify sources of organic matter in lake sediments (Meyers and Ishiwatari, 1993; Qu et al., 2007; Xiong et al., 2010), the extent of biodegradation (Prince et al., 1994), and as tracers of vehicle exhaust in the atmosphere (given their specificity to lubricating oils used in diesel and gasoline engines) (Kleeman et al., 2007; Schauer et al., 1999; Schauer et al., 2002). Information regarding hopanes and steranes in the Great Lakes is scarce. These compounds were detected in western Lake Ontario sediments where direct input of crude oil or petroleum products was indicated (Kruge et al., 1998). Hopanes and steranes were also used to identify the source of the 2009 Sarnia oil spill in Lake Huron (Wang et al., 2011b). However, these compounds have not reported for Lake Michigan.

The objective of this paper is to characterize PAHs, NPAHs, hopanes and steranes in surficial sediments from the southern basin of Lake Michigan. The analysis includes an evaluation of compositional profiles, spatial patterns and loadings. Semi-quantitative forensic techniques (diagnostic ratios) are used to identify sources of target compounds, and quantitative CMB modeling is used to apportion PAH sources. Temporal trends of PAHs are derived in conjunction with literature data. This first report regarding NPAHs and biomarkers in sediments of Lake Michigan provides information that can be used to monitor trends over time, identify sources of hydrocarbon contamination, and evaluate health and ecological consequences.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Sample collection

Sediment samples were collected as “add-ons” to an ongoing program designed to assess long term trends in benthic communities in southern Lake Michigan, which has been conducted by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory (GLERL) at the same 40 sites since 1980. Of these, we selected 24 offshore sites (Figure 1) intended to sample various locations, depths and sediment types across the southern basin of Lake Michigan. Most sites (except S-2, S-3, S-4, V-1, H-8, B-7) were in depositional zones (Corcoran, 2013). Sampling took place from August 16 to 19, 2011 on the R/V Laurentian (NOAA GLERL) using EPA methods (USEPA, 1999). The top 1 cm of sediment was collected by a Ponar Dredge, placed in solvent-washed brown glass jars with PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene)-lined screw caps, and stored at 4 °C in a refrigerator on board. Immediately after the expedition, samples were transported in coolers to our Ann Arbor, Michigan laboratory and stored at −20 °C for two weeks before extraction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Lake Michigan sampling sites. The green shaded area surrounding the lake indicates the drainage area.

2.2 Materials

All solvents were HPLC grade and obtained from Fisher Scientific Inc. (Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Florisil (60–100 mesh) and sodium sulfate (anhydrous, certified ACS granular, 10–60 mesh) for column chromatography were supplied by the same vendor. The target compounds included 16 PAHs, 11 NPAHs, 5 hopanes and 6 steranes, (Table 1). PAHs included the 16 EPA priority PAHs (CFR, 1982). The target NPAHs were selected since they have been frequently detected in airborne and diesel exhaust PM samples (Bamford and Baker, 2003; Huang et al., 2013; Khalek et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2010; Reisen and Arey, 2005). The target hopanes and steranes are those most frequently found at relatively high concentrations in sediments and diesel exhaust PM samples (Boitsov et al., 2011; Khalek et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2010; Qu et al., 2007; Schauer et al., 1999; Schauer et al., 2002).

Table 1.

List of target compounds, and summary of study measurements.

Study measurements (ng/g dry sediment)
Group Compound Abbrev. CAS # MW (g/mol) # of rings MDL (ng/g dw) Mean Std Min Max Detection freq. (%) (N = 24)
PAHs Naphthalene NAP 91-20-3 128 2 0.03 6.2 2.8 2.5 12.7 100
Acenaphthylene ACY 208-96-8 152 3 0.07 1.4 0.7 0.7 3.9 100
Acenaphthene ACT 83-32-9 154 3 0.07 - - - - 0
Fluorene FLU 86-73-7 166 3 0.10 0.22 0.30 ND 1.1 37
Phenanthrene PHE 85-01-8 178 3 0.07 70.4 36.3 29.1 179.1 100
Anthracene ANT 120-12-7 178 3 0.05 9.1 4.4 3.8 18.7 100
Fluoranthene FLA 206-44-0 202 4 0.10 134.1 84.2 47.3 385.2 100
Pyrene PYR 129-00-0 202 4 0.05 110.3 57.7 25.3 236.3 100
Benz[a]anthracene BAA 56-55-3 228 4 0.05 55.8 35.3 12.0 167.4 100
Chrysene CHR 218-01-9 228 4 0.08 75.9 40.4 19.3 175.3 100
Benzo[b]fluoranthene BBF 205-99-2 252 5 0.13 28.5 13.2 13.2 71.9 100
Benzo[k]fluoranthene BKF 207-08-9 252 5 0.14 22.5 9.5 10.4 44.2 100
Benzo[a]pyrene BAP 50-32-8 252 5 0.06 2.7 2.0 1.0 10.2 100
Dibenzo[a,h]anthracene DBA 53-70-3 278 5 0.53 24.9 17.9 7.8 95.4 100
Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene IND 193-39-5 276 6 0.38 18.2 13.5 5.9 74.1 100
Benzo[g,h,i]perylene BGP 191-24-2 276 6 0.02 6.7 5.2 2.3 27.5 100
NPAHs 1-Nitronaphthalene 1-NNAP 86-57-7 173 2 0.07 0.61 0.39 0.19 1.69 100
2-Nitronaphthalene 2-NNAP 581-89-5 173 2 0.09 0.52 0.42 0.13 2.15 100
2-Nitrobiphenyl 2-NBPL 86-00-0 199 2 0.07 - - - - 0
3-Nitrobiphenyl 3-NBPL 2113-58-8 199 2 0.06 - - - - 0
4-Nitrobiphenyl 4-NBPL 92-93-3 199 2 0.27 - - - - 0
5-Nitroacenaphthene 5-NACT 602-87-9 199 3 0.02 - - - - 0
2-Nitrofluorene 2-NFLU 607-57-8 211 3 0.11 0.83 0.55 0.22 2.64 100
9-Nitroanthracene 9-NANT 602-60-8 223 3 0.02 - - - - 0
9-Nitrophenanthrene 9-NPHE 954-46-1 223 3 0.01 - - - - 0
1-Nitropyrene 1-NPYR 5522-43-0 247 4 0.01 2.67 1.41 0.85 6.44 100
6-Nitrochrysene 6-NCHR 7496-02-8 273 4 0.06 3.22 1.67 1.15 8.09 100
Steranes 20S-5α(h), 14α(h), 17α(h)-Cholestane Ste1 41083-75-4 373 4 0.02 0.7 0.5 0.2 1.7 100
20R-5α(h), 14α(h), 17α(h)-Cholestane Ste2 481-21-0 373 4 0.03 1.1 0.5 0.4 2.8 100
20R-5α(h), 14β(h), 17β(h)-Cholestane Ste3 69483-47-2 373 4 0.02 3.4 1.9 1.3 8.4 100
20R-5α(h), 14β(h), 17β(h)-24-Methylcholestane Ste4 71117-90-3 387 4 0.03 5.5 3.6 1.7 15.2 100
20R-5α(h), 14α(h), 17α(h)-24-Ethylcholestane Ste5 62446-14-4 401 4 0.02 2.2 1.3 1.0 5.7 100
20R-5α(h), 14β(h), 17β(h)-24-Ethylcholestane Ste6 71117-92-5 401 4 0.03 1.9 1.2 0.7 5.2 100
Hopanes 17α(h),21β(h)-Hopane Hop1 471-62-5 413 5 0.02 64.5 34.3 28.6 160.8 100
17α(h)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane Hop2 53584-59-1 371 5 0.04 30.9 15.9 11.7 70.9 100
17α(h),21β(h)-30-Norhopane Hop3 53584-60-4 399 5 0.04 33.3 18.9 12.5 92.4 100
22R-17α(h),21β(h)-Homohopane Hop4 60305-22-8 427 5 0.02 31.0 16.5 9.9 79.6 100
22S-17α(h),21β(h)-Homohopane Hop5 60305-23-9 427 5 0.02 31.5 17.1 15.9 76.3 100

MW: molecular weight. MDL: instrument detection limit. Std: standard deviation. ND: not detected.

Authentic standards of PAHs, NPAHs and biomarkers were purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA), Sigma-Aldrich, (St. Louis, MO), and Chiron AS (Trondheim, Norway), respectively. Internal standards (ISs) for PAHs were fluoranthene-d10 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Andover, MA, USA) and an IS PAH mixture (Wellington Laboratories, Guelph, ON, Canada). 1-Nitrofluoanthene-d9 (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories Inc., Andover, MA, USA) was used as an IS for NPAH analyses, and n-tetracosane-d50 (Chiron Laboratories, Trondheim, Norway) as an IS for hopanes and steranes. Surrogate standards included C27-α,α,α-(20R)-cholestane-d2, 1-nitropyrene-d9, chrysene-d12 and naphthalene-d8 (Chiron Laboratories, Trondheim, Norway).

2.3 Sample preparation and chemical analysis

After decanting the water layer on top of each sediment sample and homogenization, a 10-g subsample was taken to which 15 μL of the surrogate standard was added. The sample was dried with Na2SO4, extracted twice using dichloromethane/hexane (4:1, v/v), sonicated for 30 min, and any remaining solids were separated by centrifugation and removed. Extracts were passed through an activated Florisil column and fractionated into three portions using different solvents: fraction A was eluted with 15 mL of hexane; fraction B with 15 mL of hexane/acetone (1:1, v/v); and fraction C with 30 mL of methanol. Each fraction was evaporated under a nitrogen stream to 1 mL volume, transferred to a storage vial with a Teflon crimp seal, and stored at 4 °C until analysis. Fractions A, B and C were analyzed for hopanes and steranes, PAHs, and NPAHs, respectively.

Target compounds were quantified using a gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (GC-MS; HP 6890/5973, Agilent Industries, Palo Alto, CA, USA), an autosampler, and splitless 2 μL injections. Injector and detector temperatures were 275 ºC and 280 ºC, respectively. Separations used a capillary column (DB-5, 30 m × 0.25 mm id; film thickness 0.25 μm; J&W Scientific, Folsom, CA, USA). The carrier gas was helium (1.5 mL/min, pressure of 37.4 kPa, average velocity of 31 cm/s), and the MS reagent gas was ultra-high purity methane. Details of the temperature programs and other instrumental parameters have been described previously (Huang et al., 2013). The MS detector was operated in electron impact (EI) mode for PAHs, hopanes and steranes, and in negative chemical ionization (NCI) mode for NPAHs. All analytes were individually quantified against authentic standards. In each case, 15 μL of the IS was added to each sample extract using a 25 μL syringe prior to GC/MS analysis.

Quality assurance (QA) measures included the regular use of field and lab blanks, replicates, surrogate spike recovery tests and standard reference material (SRM 2266, NIST, USA). Replicates were performed for six samples (i.e., one replicate for every 4 samples). Measurement precisions, expressed as the average relative percent difference (RPD) across the six replicate measures and compounds in the group, were 22%, 19%, 26% and 23% for PAH, NPAH, sterane and hopanes determinations above the reporting limits, respectively. Several target compounds were detected, but at trace levels, in blanks. Blank corrections were not used. The spike recovery was acceptable (between 70 to 100%), and the shift (abundance of target compounds in standard solutions before and after running a batch of samples) was below the 25% limit. QA data, including blanks, lab replicates and surrogate spike recoveries, are presented in Supplemental Tables S1–S4.

The total organic carbon (OC) content was determined using the loss-on-ignition method (Wang et al., 2011a). Briefly, 2 to 4 grams of sediment was placed in a borosilicate glass beaker, heated at 105 °C for 12 h to remove moisture, and then the sample dry weight was determined. The dried sediment was then placed in a muffle furnace (Neycraft Vulcan A-550), combusted at 500 °C for 12 h, and weighed. The weight loss was multiplied by 0.58 to calculate the OC mass (Wang et al., 2011a), and the OC content was calculated as the OC mass divided by the dry sample weight times 100%. Replicates performed for seven samples gave an average RPD of 7.1%. For calibration and standard recovery tests, similar weights of L-glutamic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and mixture of glutamic acid and CaCO3 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were prepared along with the samples. QA data for OC measurements, including replicates, blanks and recoveries, are in Supplemental Table S5.

2.4 Data analysis

PAH, NPAH, hopane and sterane concentrations were calculated as ng/g wet weight (ww), and then divided by (1 – moisture content) to obtain ng/g dry weight (dw). (Measurements were not corrected for spike recoveries since QA bounds were acceptable.) Sums and abundances exclude the few compounds (acenaphthene, nitrobiphenyls, 5-nitroacenaphthene, 9-nitroanthracene and 9-nitrophenanthrene) that were undetected in all samples (Table 1). Fluorene was detected above MDL in 9 of 24 samples with a maximum concentration of 1.1 ng/g dw, which was very low compared to other PAHs. Due to the low concentrations, low detection frequency and low toxicity (Nisbet and LaGoy, 1992), this compound was also excluded from the statistics (as further discussed in Section 3.1.1). For the remaining compounds (all with 100% detection frequencies), concentrations within a compound class were summed, e.g., the 14 detected PAHs, 5 detected NPAHs, 6 detected steranes and 5 detected hopanes were designated as ΣPAH14, ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5, respectively. The abundance of each PAH compound was calculated as the concentration of that compound divided by the ΣPAH14 concentration. Abundances of NPAHs, steranes and hopanes were calculated similarly.

Concentrations of individual PAHs (ng/g dw) at each site were divided by the corresponding %OC to yield a value normalized to 1% OC. To assess potential effects on benthic organisms, the normalized concentrations were compared to consensus-based sediment quality guidelines (SQGs) (WDNR, 2003).

Concentrations of ΣPAH14, ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 (ng/g dw) were plotted against OC content (Supplemental Figure S1A) and regression analyses were performed. The regression analyses excluded sites B-6 and V-1 because the sample containers broke before OC measurements could be completed, and determinations using the available samples were not considered accurate due to lack of homogenization or contamination.

Concentrations (dry weight) were divided by their OC content to obtain OC-adjusted concentrations (expressed as μg/g OC). (Data from sites B-6 and V-1 were excluded as noted above.)

OC-adjusted concentrations across southern Lake Michigan were estimated using 2-D ordinary Kriging and a power variogram γ(hij) = αhij1.5 where hij = distance between two points (Deglo De Besses, 2013), and then plotted as concentration maps using surface charts (Microsoft Excel 2013, Microsoft, Redmond, CA).

The loading rate of ΣPAH14 into southern Lake Michigan, L (MT/yr) was estimated as

L=[F·(A·1010cm2/km2)·100-M100·OC100·C]·10-12t/μg (1)

where F = sedimentation rate (g/cm2-yr), A = surface area of the southern portion (km2), M = sediment moisture content (%), OC = sediment OC content (%), C = average OC-adjusted ΣPAH14 concentration (μg/g OC) across the study area derived from the Kriging map, and constants provide unit conversions. Loadings of ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 were calculated similarly. Further details on these parameters are provided in Section 3.1.4. Significant uncertainties can result from using a one-compartment model that assumes the average sedimentation rate, moisture content and OC content apply to all of southern Lake Michigan, as well as the Kriging-based estimates and limited data set that incompletely accounts for localized and near-shore discharges. Still, the approach using eq. (1) provides insight regarding total loadings to open water lake sediments from all sources.

Nine diagnostic source ratios between individual compounds were calculated to help identify major sources of target SVOCs, and are listed and interpreted in Table 2. Maps for each ratio were also produced using 2-D Kriging and techniques described above.

Table 2.

Diagnostic ratios used to identify possible sources of target SVOCs in Lake Michigan sediments

Ratio Definition Interpretation Reason Reference
PAHs
 PHE/ANT PHE/ANT <10: pyrogenic; >10: petrogenic. Difference in thermodynamic stability. Budzinski et al., 1997
 FLA/PYR FLA/PYR <1: petrogenic; >1: pyrogenic. Difference in thermodynamic stability. Budzinski et al., 1997
 BAA/CHR BAA/CHR Decreases from urban to remote sites. BAA is more susceptible to photo-oxidation than CHR. Gschwend et al., 1981
 ANT/178 ANT/(ANT+PHE) <0.1: petroleum; >0.1: combustion. Difference in thermodynamic stability. Yunker et al., 2002
 FLA/202 FLA/(FLA+PYR) <0.4: petroleum; 0.4–0.5: liquid fossil fuel combustion; >0.5: grass, wood or coal combustion. Difference in thermodynamic stability. Yunker et al., 2002
 BAA/228 BAA/(BAA+CHR) <0.2: petroleum; >0.35: combustion. Difference in thermodynamic stability. Yunker et al., 2002
 IND/276 IND/(IND+BGP) <0.2: petroleum; 0.2–0.5: liquid fossil fuel combustion; >0.5: grass, wood or coal combustion. Difference in thermodynamic stability. Yunker et al., 2002
 ΣLPAHsHPAHs sum of ≤ 3-ring PAHs / sum of > 3-ring PAHs <1: petrogenic; >1: pyrogenic. More larger PAHs are formed during combustion. Wang et al., 2006
NPAHs
 1-NPYR/PYR 1-nitropyrene/pyrene 0.36: diesel engines; 0.001: coal combustion. Formation of NPAHs increase with increasing temperature. Tang et al., 2005
Hopanes and steranes
 C31-22S/(22S+22R) 22S-17α(h),21β(h)-homohopane/[22S-17α(h),21β(h)- homohopane+22R-17α(h),21β(h)-homohopane] 0.6 indicates full maturity (petroleum); >0.5: petrogenic dominates; <0.5: biogenic dominates. Themal maturity indicator. Hostettler et al., 1992

2.5 Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) modeling

CMB modeling was used to apportion PAHs in southern Lake Michigan sediments, following applications performed previously (Christensen et al., 1999; Li et al., 2003; Van Metre and Mahler, 2010). This approach assumes that the concentration of each chemical species measured at a receptor is linear combination of the contributions from various sources. The EPA-CMB v8.2 software (EPA, 2004a) with inputs including source profiles (described below) and experimentally measured PAH concentrations in Lake Michigan sediments, in ng/g dw (Supplemental Table S9). The precision of each measurement, used in the model, was determined from duplicate laboratory analyses, and calculated as the average percent difference between duplicates (which ranged from 17% to 49% among the 16 PAHs) multiplied by the measured concentration.

Twelve PAH source profiles were considered (Supplemental Table S10). They include eight coal- and traffic- related profiles based on a comprehensive compilation (Li et al., 2003), an industrial boiler profile that represents the average of four boiler types (heavy oil, diesel, heavy oil + natural gas and coke oven gas + blast furnace gas) (Li et al., 1999), and a fireplace combustion profile for burning pine wood (Schauer et al., 2001). Two profiles for coal-tar sealed pavement dust were also included: the mean profile across six cities (Minneapolis, MN; Chicago, IL; Detroit, MI; Washington, D.C.; New Haven, CT and Austin, TX), and the Chicago profile (Van Metre et al., 2008). All of these profiles used PAH measurements in the particulate phase except the boiler profile, which included both vapor and particulate phases. The profiles combined BBF and BKF given the difficulties separating these two compounds (Li et al., 2003). An uncertainty of 40% was applied to each component of each profile (Li et al., 2003; Van Metre and Mahler, 2010).

For the EPA-CMB v8.2 software, the maximum number of iterations was set at 20 (maximum allowable), and a maximum source uncertainty of 50% was used, exceeding the default (20%) given the higher uncertainties expected for PAHs in sediments due to complex transport and transformation processes (Li et al., 2003). The minimum source projection was 0.95 (default value), below which the source is considered as “inestimable,” and the option “source elimination” was selected, which eliminated physically impossible negative source contributions.

3. Results and Discussion

The physical characteristics and SVOC concentrations at the 24 Lake Michigan sediment samples are presented in Table 3, and relative abundances of individual PAHs, NPAHs and biomarkers are shown in Figure 2. Maps of OC-adjusted ΣPAH14, ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 concentrations are displayed in Figure 3.

Table 3.

Lake Michigan sampling sites, physical data and SVOC concentrations

Site Latitude
(°N)
Longitude
(°W)
Water depth
(m)
Distance
from shore
(km)
Distance to nearest
AOC/industrial/urban areas
(km)
Sediment type Moisture content
(%)
OC
(%)
Σ15PAH
(ng/g dry)
Σ11NPAH
(ng/g dry)
Σ6Sterane
(ng/g dry)
Σ5Hopane
(ng/g dry)
A-1 42.108 86.533 16 3.4 3.8 sand 8.4 0.6 496.9 5.13 9.7 174.4
B-2 42.400 86.450 52 13.3 34.2 silt 60.1 3.5 802.8 10.52 18.1 300.2
B-3 42.400 86.592 64 24.3 42.1 silt 59.2 2.3 831.6 8.20 20.6 256.1
B-4 42.392 87.017 124 53.9 53.5 silt over loam 60.0 3.6 513.0 9.60 17.7 196.2
B-5 42.375 87.350 108 38.0 38.9 silt over loam 49.3 2.7 508.6 9.13 21.3 207.4
B-6 42.375 87.500 84 25.6 26.6 silt over loam 40.6 4.7* 327.3 6.59 11.4 138.9
B-7 42.367 87.667 45 12.0 12.8 silty sand 33.5 0.9 312.8 4.89 6.4 103.1
C-5 42.817 86.833 136 50.8 53.1 silt 64.0 4.6 860.2 17.02 20.8 323.0
C-6 42.795 87.447 105 25.4 44.6 silt over sandy loam 39.1 1.6 421.8 5.23 8.8 113.6
C-7 42.792 87.575 60 15.0 36.8 silt over sandy loam 47.8 2.0 609.5 8.50 15.6 221.2
EG-14 42.378 86.775 98 36.7 37.7 silt 62.0 4.4 1290.8 14.48 36.0 355.0
EG-18 42.293 86.643 60 22.2 23.6 silt 47.4 2.3 588.5 6.18 19.5 255.3
H-15 42.158 87.433 60 22.9 34.1 silty sand 28.4 0.5 332.6 2.91 7.8 102.3
H-22 42.139 86.664 48 14.6 14.8 silt 60.1 2.1 903.1 6.52 24.0 332.6
H-28 42.630 86.265 22 2.9 5.2 medium to coarse sand 18.2 0.3 347.4 5.64 10.0 98.7
H-29 42.630 86.306 32 6.3 8.3 silt 39.7 1.8 364.3 6.85 7.4 114.0
H-30 42.630 86.433 70 16.7 18.6 silt 66.1 4.0 1234.5 18.59 33.3 351.1
H-31 43.041 86.333 45 6.9 21.4 silt, some sand 55.6 3.0 588.9 8.90 15.1 186.0
H-8 42.399 87.771 19 2.6 6.0 silt with some clay 28.9 0.8 451.2 5.73 11.2 116.4
S-2 41.765 87.391 13 8.5 11.7 fine sand 20.6 0.3 398.1 7.81 8.8 125.8
S-3 41.850 87.320 25 19.4 22.7 silty sand 21.6 0.5 212.8 5.01 6.2 97.7
S-4 41.935 87.252 40 30.4 33.7 silty sand 23.8 0.5 315.8 6.85 9.5 127.8
V-1 41.697 87.013 17 1.6 35.9 clay, some sand 18.3 4.6* 329.2 3.74 6.8 111.3
X-1 43.103 86.367 45 7.9 14.7 silt 42.2 1.7 564.1 6.76 10.4 181.1
Mean 41.5 2.2 566.9 8.0 14.8 191.2
Std 17.4 1.5 286.1 3.9 8.2 88.4
Min 8.4 0.3 212.8 2.9 6.2 97.7
Max 66.1 4.7 1290.8 18.6 36.0 355.0

OC: organic carbon. Std: standard deviation.

OC values marked with an asterisk were not used in regression analyses (see Section 2.4).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Boxplots showing the concentrations of individual (A) PAHs; (B) NPAHs; and (C) biomarkers that are normalized to the corresponding total concentrations. Boxplots show 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Concentration maps of OC-adjusted concentrations of (A) ΣPAH14; (B) ΣNPAH5; (C) ΣSterane6; and (D) ΣHopane5. Units are μg/g OC. White dots indicate sediment sampling sites in this study. Graph axes show Universal Transverse Mercator coordinate system.

3.1 Concentrations and distributions

3.1.1 PAHs

Of the 16 target PAHs, 14 were detected at concentrations above MDLs in all samples. Acenaphthene was not detected in any sample, and fluorene was detected in only 9 of 24 samples above MDL (0.033 ng/g dw) with a maximum concentration of 1.1 ng/g dw (site B-5). Sites with detectable fluorene levels were dispersed and did not show any clear patterns. Due to its low concentrations, low detection frequency and low toxicity (toxic equivalent factor of 0.001) (Nisbet and LaGoy, 1992), fluorene was omitted from subsequent statistics. Three- and four-ring compounds were most abundant, e.g., phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene and chrysene, and accounted for about 80% of ΣPAH14, while five- and six-ring PAHs constituted the remainder. PAH profiles were similar across sites, as shown by Figure 2 and the correlation between concentrations at different sites (Supplemental Table S6).

ΣPAH14 concentrations varied from 210 to 1290 ng/g dw among sites, and were significantly correlated with OC content (p < 0.0001, R = 0.79, n = 22; Supplemental Figure S1A), as shown previously (Liang et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 1993). This correlation reflects the tendency for PAHs and other hydrophobic organic chemicals to sorb to organic matter in bottom sediments (Karickhoff, 1981). The OC-adjusted concentrations better reflect spatial differences in the sediments. Samples collected closest to the AOCs, specifically sites H-8, S-2, X-1, H-28 and A-1 corresponding to Waukegan Harbor, Grand Calumet, Muskegon Lake, Kalamazoo River and the St. Joseph River estuary, respectively, had significantly higher ΣPAH14 concentrations (86 ± 43 μg/g OC) than off-shore sites (29 ± 16 μg/g OC; t = 2.95, df = 4.3, p = 0.039).

The concentration map (Figure 3A) shows a clear pattern of declining concentration with increasing distance from the shore. This map shows the mean values from the kriging interpolation and does not include the confidence intervals. In addition, concentrations in areas with few or no data points and near the coast can have large uncertainties. For example, the southwest near-shore regions near Chicago and Gary had the highest interpolated mean ΣPAH14 levels (160 to 180 μg/g OC). Gary is near an AOC, the Grand Calumet River, that is heavily contaminated with PAHs, as well as Indiana Harbor and the Ship Canal (EPA, 2013; MacDonald et al., 2002; Nevers et al., 2013). Chicago is a large and highly industrialized city with potentially significant emissions from traffic, diesel engines, coke ovens, coal combustion, wood burning (Bzdusek et al., 2004; Simcik et al., 1999), and coal-tar pavement sealcoat (Van Metre and Mahler, 2010). Measurements in sediments of the Grand Calumet region include ΣPAH17 levels from 123 to 500 μg/g OC (4.9 to 20 μg/g dw, assumed 4% OC) in adjacent Lake Calumet (discharging into the Calumet River and then into Lake Michigan) (Li et al., 2003), mean ΣPAH16 concentrations of 1400 μg/g OC at Indiana Ridge Marsh, 2700 μg/g OC at the Indiana Ship Canal, 630 μg/g OC at the Little Calumet River, and 40 μg/g OC at Big Marsh (all converted from μg/g dw assuming 4% OC) (Levengood and Schaeffer, 2011). These levels exceed the off-shore kriging estimates near Chicago and Gary by two- to tenfold. Since the present study uses only 24 open-water sites with water depths greater than 10 m, and no samples were taken directly areas near from AOCs and urban and industrial discharges, the mapping results apply to only open water areas. While estimated concentrations appear reasonable, additional measurements are desirable for confirmation.

Time trends are examined using data from five earlier studies that measured PAH levels in Lake Michigan surficial sediments during the 1980s and 1990s. Three studies examined open water areas (Eadie et al., 1982; Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986; Simcik et al., 1996), and two examined Green Bay (Su et al., 1998; Zhang et al., 1993), which is separated from the open water and near the industrial city of Green Bay and two AOCs. The six PAHs measured in common across the studies (phenanthrene, fluoranthene, pyrene, chrysene, benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), and benzo[ghi]perylene) were summed (designated ΣPAH6) and are depicted in Figure 4. ΣPAH6 concentrations in open water sediments declined from 1980 to 2011, and a linear regression using mean concentrations and five time points indicates an average decrease of 42 ± 5 ng/g per year (Figure 4; R2 = 0.96 ). This trend likely reflects the decreasing PAH loadings into the lake, a result of lower airborne concentrations and atmosphere deposition rates, as observed in gaseous, particulate and precipitation sampling in Chicago (Sun et al., 2006a; Sun et al., 2006b), in vapor phase sampling at remote sites including Eagle Harbor and Sleeping Bear Dunes (Sun et al., 2006b), and as derived from sediment cores (Schneider et al., 2001; Simcik et al., 1996). The decline has been attributed to the transition from coal to oil and natural gas, controls on industrial emissions, reduced coke production, and changed coking technology (Schneider et al., 2001; Simcik et al., 1996); it may also reflect decreased emission rates from vehicles occurring since the 1970s (Beyea et al., 2008). The trend also might reflect analytical changes that have increased the resolution and sensitivity of measurements; sampling and analysis of sediment cores would be useful to confirm results.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Trend of Σ6PAH concentrations in Lake Michigan sediments (showing mean, maximum and minimum of observations, plus regression line). ΣPAH6 = 85433 – 42.3x, where x is time (year).

Green Bay sediments have higher ΣPAH6 concentrations that do not fit the trend line in Figure 4. Green Bay is near two AOCs (Menominee River and Fox River Lower Green Bay) and an industrial city. High PAH concentrations due to coal tar wastes have been detected in Menominee River sediments, and leaking underground storage tanks have been a concern for the lower Fox River Basin (EPA, 2013). The proximity to PAH sources likely explains the higher PAH concentrations seen these sediments.

The PAH concentrations in open water sediments of southern Lake Michigan in the present study (210 to 1290 ng/g dw) are generally comparable to levels elsewhere, although lower than levels in highly polluted areas. For example, sediment ΣPAH19 concentrations in Isle Royale National Park, Lake Superior ranged from 17 to 346 ng/g dw at background sites, and 1516 to 3410 ng/g at marinas and docks (Cox and Clements, 2013). Sediment ΣPAH13 concentrations reached 14 μg/g dw in Detroit River, but ranged from 0.25 to 2.0 μg/g in other parts of the Huron-Erie Corridor (Szalinska et al., 2011). In two headwater lakes of the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Canada, ΣPAH16 concentrations ranged from 100 to 320 ng/g dw throughout the sediment cores (Jautzy et al., 2013). ΣPAH15 concentrations in Lake Taihu sediments in highly populated eastern China were 209 to 1003 ng/g dw (Zhang et al., 2012). Surface sediments from Lake Koumoundourou, Greece had ΣPAH14 concentrations from 780 to 3600 ng/g dw (Hahladakis et al., 2013).

Normalized PAH concentrations were compared to consensus-based SQGs to assess potential effects on benthic organisms using recommendations by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR, 2003) (Supplemental Table S8). For most individual PAHs and the PAH sum, concentrations were lower than threshold effect concentrations (TECs), indicating that the toxicity effect to benthic-dwelling organisms is unlikely. However, concentrations of pyrene, chrysene, and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene at site S-2 (259, 187, and 36 ng/g, respectively), and pyrene, benz[a]anthracene and chrysene at site H-28 (193, 134, and 183 ng/g) exceeded TECs, as did dibenzo[a,h]anthracene at sites A-1 and H-15 (47 and 38 ng/g). However, concentrations were much lower than midpoint effect concentrations (MECs) and probable effect concentrations (PECs), suggesting a low risk to the benthic organisms. The B[a]P toxic equivalents were not calculated for these samples given that the bottom sediments were too deep for human exposure and no other human exposure pathway was plausible.

3.1.2 NPAHs

Five of the 11 target NPAHs (1-nitronaphthlene, 2-nitronaphthalene, 2-nitrofluorene, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene) were detected above MDLs in all samples; the six other NPAHs were never detected. ΣNPAH5 concentrations ranged from 2.9 to 18.6 ng/g dw (Table 3), roughly 10 to 100 times lower than the ΣPAH14 concentrations. (NPAH data at each site are presented in Supplemental Table S13). The two most abundant compounds, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene, respectively comprised an average of 33% and 40% of the ΣNPAH5 concentration (Figure 2B). The abundance of 6-nitrochrysene is noteworthy given its high carcinogenic potency, i.e., toxic equivalent factor or TEF = 10 relative to B[a]P (RIDEM, 2008). Average abundances of the other NPAHs detected were below 10%.

Like the PAHs, ΣNPAH5 levels were significantly correlated with OC content (p < 0.0001, R2 = 0.85, n = 22, Supplemental Figure S1B). OC-adjusted ΣNPAH5 concentrations were higher at sites near AOCs and urban/industrial areas (1.33 ± 0.95 μg/g OC) compared to other sites (0.43 ± 0.28 μg/g OC; Mann-Whitney U = 10, p = 0.005). The concentration map again shows declining concentrations with increasing distance from the shore, and high concentrations near source areas (Chicago/Gary and Kalamazoo River) (Figure 3B), suggesting that urban and industrial sources are important in near-shore environments. Again, the map shows only mean values, and near shore areas are subject to large uncertainties. 2-Nitronaphthalene, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene were highly correlated with each other, while 1-nitronaphthalene was significantly correlated with 2-nitrofluorene (Supplemental Table S6).

NPAH concentrations in the low ng/g range have been reported in several studies examining both freshwater and marine sediments. ΣNPAH5 (1- and 2-nitronaphthalenes, 1-nitropyrene, 6-nitrochrysene and 9-nitrophenanthrene) in Elbe river, Germany and Czech Republic ranged from 5.4 to 14.9 ng/g (Lubcke-von Varel et al., 2011). In sediments of the Suimon River, Japan, 1-nitropyrene and 2-nitrofluorene averaged 25 and 1.5 ng/g, respectively (Sato et al., 1985). Marine coastal sediments near Barcelona, Spain had 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene concentrations of 0.68 and 0.52 ng/g dw, respectively (Fernandez et al., 1992). ΣNPAH3 (9-nitroanthracene, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene) concentrations in Hiroshima Bay, Japan averaged 2.2 ng/g dw (n=11; range: 0.25 to 7.34) (Ozaki et al., 2010). These levels are roughly comparable to those measured in southern Lake Michigan in the present study (ΣNPAH5 average of 8.0 ± 3.9 ng/g, range from 2.9–18.6 ng/g dw, n = 24). Much higher levels were measured in sediments of a small municipal stormwater settling pond in Varney Pond, MN, e.g., 1-nitropyrene, 2-nitrofluorene and 6-nitrochrysene ranged from 19–120, 40–710, and 73–150 μg/g dw, respectively (MDH, 2011), which suggests the significance of urban runoff sources.

3.1.3 Biomarkers

All target hopanes and steranes in all samples were detected above MDLs. ΣHopane5 concentrations ranged from 98 to 355 ng/g dw and ΣSterane6 levels from 6.2 to 36 ng/g dry weight. Like PAHs and NPAHs, levels were correlated with OC content (p < 0.0001, R = 0.80 and 0.83 for steranes and hopanes, respectively; p < 0.0001) (Supplemental Figures S1C and D). OC-adjusted ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 concentrations displayed spatial patterns similar to the PAHs (Figures 3C and 3D), and concentrations were significantly higher near source areas (sites H-8, S-2, X-1, H-28 and A-1) than other sites (for ΣHopane5: Mann-Whitney U = 12, p = 0.009; for ΣSterane6: t = 2.62, df = 4.41, p = 0.053). Among steranes, 20R-5α(H),14β(H),17β(H)-24-methylcholestane and 20R-5α(H),14β(H),17β(H)-cholestane were most abundant, contributing to 36% and 23% of the total, respectively. Among hopanes, 17α(H),21β(H)-hopane was most abundant (35% of ΣHopane5); the four other hopanes had similar contributions (16–17%). The profiles of the biomarkers were similar across sites (Figure 4), and individual hopane and sterane compounds were significantly correlated to each other (Supplemental Table S7).

3.1.4 Loading rates of SVOCs

The loading rate of ΣPAH14 to open water sediments of southern Lake Michigan, estimated using eq. (1), the spatial average OC-adjusted ΣPAH14 concentration (41 μg/g OC), a mass sedimentation rate of 0.0356 g/cm2-yr for southern Lake Michigan (Corcoran, 2013), the average moisture content of 41.5% and OC content of 2.2% (this study), and the estimated surface area of the southern portion (21600 km2), is 4.1 t/yr. Although we did not measure concentrations in the northern portion of the lake, an approximate lake-wide loading rate is calculated by scaling up to the entire Lake surface area (58000 km2), which gives a ΣPAH14 loading of 10.9 t/yr. Using the same approach, lake-wide loadings of ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 are 0.16, 0.25 and 3.6 t/yr, respectively. The historical decline in PAH levels must be considered to compare these results to earlier loading estimates. A 1980 estimate of PAH loadings to Lake Michigan, obtained by summing the PAH inputs from various sources (some of which had inconsistent PAH species) is 50 to 55 t/yr (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). Using the regression line for PAH levels in Lake Michigan sediments shown in Figure 4, ΣPAH6 concentration in 1980 (1679 ng/g dw) was 4.6 times the level in 2011 (368 ng/g dw). Assuming that ΣPAH14 concentrations follow the ΣPAH6 trend, and that sedimentation rate, sediment moisture content, and OC content are unchanged, then the ΣPAH14 loading rate in 1980 would be 4.6 times the current (2011) loading or 50.6 t/yr, within the range reported for 1980. A second and independent estimate of PAH loadings, based on accumulation profiles in sediment cores sampled in 1991–1993 (and calculated using a ΣPAH17 deposition rate = 50–70 ng/cm2-yr and area = 58000 km2), is 29 to 41 t/yr (Simcik et al., 1996). For 1992, we estimate a ΣPAH14 loading rate of 35.2 t/yr, again within the reported range.

While the estimated ΣPAH14 loading rates agree well with the earlier estimates, uncertainties and possible errors in our estimates are recognized. Overall, the southern portion of the lake is more polluted than the northern, thus applying the average concentration in the southern portion to the whole lake may overestimate loadings. However, this may be offset since near-shore areas that tend to have higher concentrations were under-sampled. Second, sedimentation rate, sediment moisture content and OC content can vary across sites, and applying the average data from the southern portion to the whole lake may be inaccurate. Third, sampling and measurement variation can affect results, although open water sediment samples provide a high degree of spatial and temporal representativeness, particularly compared to airborne and deposition samples that can vary considerably. Given the difficulty in assessing these factors, especially the extrapolation to the whole lake, no quantitative estimates of uncertainty is provided. Despite these concerns, our loading estimates show remarkable agreement with earlier estimates that used independent methods. Moreover, the stability and representativeness of sediment samples suggests that this approach for estimating SVOC loadings is useful and applicable to other persistent and sediment-bound contaminants. However, the uncertainties of the approach, especially in near shore areas, should be recognized.

3.2 Source identification

3.2.1 PAHs

Diagnostic ratios

PAH sources contributing to southern Lake Michigan sediments are identified using abundances and ratios of individual compounds, which serve as source indicators. Eight diagnostic ratios for identifying PAH sources (Table 4) are used to help identify sources. These ratios are semi-quantitative (i.e., numerical apportionments are not provided), and they are most useful when there is a single dominating source, which is unlikely in a large region like Lake Michigan. In addition, the ratios can be influenced by atmospheric reactions and selective loss processes, and thus may provide contradictory or inconsistent results (Katsoyiannis et al., 2011). Despite such limitations, the ratios can provide useful insights to contributing sources.

Table 4.

SVOC diagnostic ratio results (organized based on distance from shore)

Site Distance from shore (km) Distance to nearest AOC/industrial/urban areas (km) BAA/CHR PHE/ANT FLA/PYR ANT/178 FLA/202 BAA/228 IND/276 ΣLPAHs/ΣHPAHs 1-NPYR/PYR C31-22S/(22S+22R)
V-1 1.6 35.9 0.69 7.9 1.5 0.11 0.60 0.41 0.77 0.19 0.016 0.62
H-8 2.6 6 0.70 6.1 1.5 0.14 0.60 0.41 0.82 0.15 0.025 0.52
H-28 2.9 5.2 0.73 3.9 1.7 0.20 0.63 0.42 0.79 0.14 0.030 0.50
A-1 3.4 3.8 0.71 7.0 1.0 0.13 0.50 0.42 0.78 0.19 0.014 0.51
H-29 6.3 8.3 0.67 6.7 1.2 0.13 0.54 0.40 0.81 0.13 0.034 0.46
H-31 6.9 21.4 0.68 6.6 1.8 0.13 0.64 0.40 0.83 0.14 0.027 0.47
X-1 7.9 14.7 0.68 11.5 1.2 0.08 0.54 0.40 0.78 0.21 0.018 0.47
S-2 8.5 11.7 0.55 6.1 1.1 0.14 0.52 0.35 0.80 0.22 0.036 0.58
B-7 12.0 12.8 0.72 10.2 0.8 0.09 0.45 0.42 0.83 0.19 0.028 0.44
B-2 13.3 34.2 0.75 10.7 1.0 0.09 0.49 0.43 0.77 0.20 0.021 0.51
H-22 14.6 14.8 0.72 6.0 1.5 0.14 0.60 0.42 0.81 0.16 0.010 0.64
C-7 15.0 36.8 0.69 9.6 1.2 0.09 0.55 0.41 0.82 0.20 0.027 0.42
H-30 16.7 18.6 0.96 6.1 1.6 0.14 0.62 0.49 0.80 0.11 0.027 0.43
S-3 19.4 22.7 0.62 13.5 1.9 0.07 0.65 0.38 0.77 0.43 0.080 0.39
EG-18 22.2 23.6 0.85 6.8 1.1 0.13 0.51 0.46 0.81 0.24 0.017 0.65
H-15 22.9 34.1 0.73 9.4 1.6 0.10 0.61 0.42 0.81 0.24 0.018 0.64
B-3 24.3 42.1 0.75 10.3 0.7 0.09 0.43 0.43 0.77 0.21 0.011 0.37
C-6 25.4 44.6 0.75 7.8 0.6 0.11 0.36 0.43 0.80 0.11 0.017 0.47
B-6 25.6 26.6 0.73 7.2 0.9 0.12 0.47 0.42 0.77 0.14 0.034 0.47
S-4 30.4 33.7 0.95 5.0 1.4 0.17 0.59 0.49 0.78 0.23 0.044 0.54
EG-14 36.7 37.7 0.71 9.6 1.6 0.09 0.62 0.41 0.78 0.20 0.021 0.49
B-5 38.0 38.9 0.55 6.4 0.9 0.14 0.47 0.36 0.77 0.20 0.024 0.49
C-5 50.8 53.1 0.77 4.2 0.9 0.19 0.46 0.44 0.78 0.13 0.032 0.60
B-4 53.9 53.5 0.57 16.7 1.5 0.06 0.61 0.36 0.77 0.30 0.046 0.43
Mean 0.72 8.1 1.3 0.12 0.54 0.42 0.79 0.19 0.027 0.51
Std 0.1 3.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1
Min 0.55 3.9 0.6 0.06 0.36 0.35 0.77 0.11 0.010 0.37
Max 0.96 16.7 1.9 0.20 0.65 0.49 0.83 0.43 0.080 0.65

The BAA/CHR ratio indicates urban influences by reflecting differences in the susceptibility to photo-oxidation (Table 2) (Gschwend and Hites, 1981). The average BAA/CHR ratio (0.72 ± 0.23) is comparable with previous studies and within the range reported for sediments collected near urban areas (Gschwend and Hites, 1981; Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). Site B4, most distant from urban sources (54 km from shore, 54 km from Benton Harbor and 175 km from Chicago), had the second lowest BAA/CHR ratio (0.57). However, this ratio was not significantly correlated with either distance from shore or to AOCs, industrial or urban areas, and there was no clear spatial pattern (see Supplemental Figures S2C), as has been noted previously (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). This lack of correlation can arise from several factors. First, the southern Lake Michigan contains several cities/harbors/AOCs, and the off-shore samples likely are affected by multiple sources. Second, this ratio does not apply to waterborne transport, e.g., materials discharged or deposited in near-shore areas and then transported and distributed to sediments (Simcik et al., 1999). Third, there is movement and redistribution of surface sediments in southern Lake Michigan (Corcoran, 2013). Finally, as noted, this ratio could be influenced by other physiochemical processes (Katsoyiannis et al., 2011).

The remaining seven PAH ratios indicate petrogenic or pyrogenic sources (Table 2) (Budzinski et al., 1997; Wang et al., 2006; Yunker et al., 2002). PHE/ANT and FLA/PYR ratios are usually used simultaneously (Budzinski et al., 1997). A plot of PHE/ANT vs. FLA/PYR ratios suggests that pyrogenic (i.e., combustion) sources are the main contributor of PAHs at most (N=14) sites (Figure 5). Seven sites reflect a combination of petrogenic and pyrogenic sources. Three sites are in the petrogenic zone, but at the boundary, suggesting significant contributions from pyrogenic sources. The ANT/178 ratio averaged 0.12 ± 0.04 (N = 24) and several sites had ratios just slightly below 0.10. The FLA/202 ratio averaged 0.54 ± 0.13 (n=24); 17 sites had ratios >0.50; six sites had ratios between 0.40 and 0.50; and only one site had a ratio <0.4. All sampling sites had BAA/228 ratios above 0.35, IND/276 ratios above 0.50, and ΣLPAHs/ΣHPAHs ratios below 1. Together, these ratios suggest the dominance of combustion sources, especially coal and/or wood combustion, with some contribution from liquid fossil fuel combustion, i.e., vehicle emissions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Plot of PHE / ANT ratios against FLA / PYR ratios for all samples.

Although the PAH diagnostic ratios are qualitative and have limitations, they consistently identify pyrogenic sources as the major contributors of PAHs to southern Lake Michigan sediments. This is in accordance with previous apportionment studies, which identified traffic emissions, coal combustion and wood burning as major sources (Bzdusek et al., 2004; Christensen and Arora, 2007; Simcik et al., 1996).

CMB results

Colinearity among the twelve PAH source profiles and the mean PAH profile in southern Lake Michigan sediments initially, initially evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients (Supplemental Table S11), showed several profiles were similar to the 24-site average profile, including those for coal-tar Chicago, pine-wood combustion, power plant, traffic average, and diesel engine exhaust (r = 0.93, 0.91, 0.89, 0.89 and 0.87, respectively). Several source profiles were significantly correlated, suggesting the possibility of multicollinearity issues, e.g., unstable source estimates and convergence issues. To investigate and help account for such concerns, ten CMB models using different fitting species and subsets of source profiles were tested. Each was run 24 times (one for each site), and the “preferred” model discussed here was selected as the model that converged at all 24 sites and showed good performance in terms of R2, χ2 and percentage of ΣPAH mass explained (Supplemental Table S12). This model included four sources: coal-fired power plant, coke oven, diesel engine and coal-tar pavement dust Chicago. Since all four traffic-related profiles were highly correlated, the diesel engine profile is considered to represent traffic-related sources. Including industrial boiler and pine-wood combustion profiles caused convergence issues at many sites. This model included nine fitting species, specifically, PHE to BGP with the exceptions of ANT and BAP, two compounds that have are highly reactive in the atmosphere (Gschwend and Hites, 1981; Li et al., 2003).

Using the selected four-source model, diesel engine exhaust was identified at all sites as the most significant source, contributing to 56 ± 18% of the ΣPAHs; coal power plant emissions were identified (source contribution larger than zero) at 22 sites, contributing 27 ± 14%; coal-tar sealed pavement dust was identified at 19 sites with a 16 ± 11% contribution; and coke oven was detected at 11 sites with a 7 ± 12% contribution (Supplemental Table S12). These results are consistent with the diagnostic ratios as well as previous apportionment studies highlighting the importance of traffic emissions and coal combustion (Bzdusek et al., 2004; Christensen and Arora, 2007; Simcik et al., 1996). While coal-tar sealed pavement dust was identified, its contribution was low compared to the 57% estimated for urban lakes in the eastern U.S. (Van Metre and Mahler, 2010), possibly reflecting the significance of atmospheric deposition in Lake Michigan as compared to urban runoff, the principal pathway for coal-tar sealcoat dust.

Across the 24 sites, the CMB model performance was reasonable, e.g., R2, χ2 and percentage mass explained averaged 0.81, 3.1 and 106%, respectively (Supplemental Table S12). However, CMB apportionments in urban lakes have attained better performance, e.g., R2 > 0.9 and χ2 < 2 (Li et al., 2003; Van Metre and Mahler, 2010). Given the potentially longer transport distances and times relevant to Lake Michigan, the assumption that profiles remain constant from source to receptor (sampled sediment) (EPA, 2004b) may not reflect chemical, photochemical and biological degradation, as well as partitioning, that occurs during atmospheric transport, deposition and sediment burial (Galarneau, 2008; Li et al., 2003). These concerns may be mitigated for urban lakes near sources. Target transformation and other techniques (Pistikopoulos et al., 1990; Thurston and Spengler, 1985) might be used to help address such issues.

3.2.2 NPAHs

Few diagnostic source ratios are available for NPAHs. The 1-NPYR/PYR ratio has been used to distinguish contributions of diesel-engine vehicles and coal combustion emissions in both atmospheric particulate matter and marine sediments (Ozaki et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2005). This ratio is approximately 0.001 for lower temperature (900 °C) coal stove emissions, and 0.36 for higher temperature (2700 °C) diesel engine exhaust (Tang et al., 2005). Although the type of coal stove sampled was not stated, this ratio may apply to coal combustion in smaller furnaces that have lower temperatures than diesel engines. Coal and wood stoves/fireplaces are used for residential heating or aesthetics around Lake Michigan area, although wood stoves may be more popular. In Lake Michigan sediments, the 1-NPYR/PYR ratio averaged 0.03 ± 0.01 (range from 0.01 to 0.08, N = 24, Table 4), which is comparable to levels reported in marine sediments (0.017 – 0.023) (Ozaki et al., 2010), suggesting a combination of diesel engine and coal combustion emissions, consistent with the sources identified for the parent PAHs. This ratio showed a complex spatial pattern (Supplemental Figure S2H), possibly due to the instability of diagnostic ratios in the environment, as discussed above.

The NPAH profiles provide additional source information. In Lake Michigan sediments, 1-nitropyrene and 6-nitrochrysene were the predominant compounds, followed by 2-nitrofluorene. In the atmosphere, these compounds are primarily emitted by diesel vehicles (Albinet et al., 2007; Bamford and Baker, 2003; Reisen and Arey, 2005), and an airborne 2-nitrofluorene concentration equal to 15% of that of 1-nitropyrene is commonly observed (Albinet et al., 2007). Thus, levels of these compounds suggest contribution from diesel engine exhaust. On the other hand, sediment concentrations of 6-nitrochrysene were slightly higher than those of 1-nitropyrene, while concentrations of 6-nitrochrysene generally are lower than those of 1-nitropyrene in diesel and gasoline engine emissions, tire debris and asphalt paste (Khalek et al., 2011; Ozaki et al., 2010). However, atmospheric formation of 6-nitrochrysene has been shown by exposing chrysene to 10 ppm of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) (Tokiwa et al., 1981). Chrysene is a marker of coal combustion (Harrison et al., 1996), and the most abundant PAH in coal power plant emissions (Bzdusek et al., 2004). States surrounding Lake Michigan, including Illinois and Indiana, have numerous coal-fired power plants. Thus, we speculate that a portion of the chrysene emitted from coal combustion sources undergoes atmospheric transformation into 6-nitrochrysene, followed by deposited in the lake and incorporation into sediments. However, further studies are needed to confirm this pathway.

3.2.3 Biomarkers

Anthropogenic sources of hopanes and steranes in Lake Michigan include crude oil and derived products, e.g., engine lubricating oil. Although major oil spills have not been reported in southern Lake Michigan, it may be subject to some oil spillage since Indiana Harbor and Chicago are major distribution centers for petroleum products (Helfrich and Armstrong, 1986). In addition, hopanes and steranes are present in lubricating oils of diesel and gasoline engines, and are components of vehicle exhaust (Khalek et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2010; Schauer et al., 1999; Schauer et al., 2002). Similarly, outboard motor oil and exhaust from ships/boats are potential sources (Bieger et al., 1996). Sediments can also reflect natural sources of hopanes and steranes including decomposition of bacteria, algae and vascular plants (Qu et al., 2007; Xiong et al., 2010).

Unlike PAHs and NPAHs, diagnostic ratios of hopanes and steranes cannot distinguish between petrogenic and pyrogenic sources because these compounds are largely conserved during combustion and environmental transport (Manan et al., 2011; Neff and Durell, 2012). However, these ratios can distinguish petrogenic and biogenic hydrocarbons (Hostettler et al., 1992; Neff and Durell, 2012; Qu et al., 2007; van Dongen et al., 2008). One such ratio can be calculated considering the hopanes and steranes measured in the present study. This ratio, C31-22S/(22S+22R), compares two diastereomers of C31-homohopanes (17α(h), 21β(h)-homohopanes), and a value of 0.6 indicates equilibrium or full maturity, i.e., petroleum (Table 2). In Lake Michigan, this ratio ranged from 0.37 to 0.65; four sites had ratios >0.6; seven sites had ratios from 0.5 – 0.6; and 13 sites had ratios <0.5. The ratio map shows that the lower half of the study area tends to have ratios > 0.5, while the upper half generally displays ratios < 0.5 (Supplemental Figure S2I). This suggests that the southern end of the lake was significantly impacted by petroleum (crude oil, vehicle emissions, etc.), while biogenic inputs (vascular plants, microbes) become more important in the central and northern parts. While consistent with earlier results, the ratio map does not represent sampling and analytical variability, and a single diagnostic ratio might not be robust, thus, measurement of additional compounds and calculation of several diagnostic ratios in future studies would help to confirm results.

4. Conclusions

Four groups of SVOCs were measured in sediments collected at 24 off-shore sites in southern Lake Michigan of varying water depths and sediment types. Compared to the 3–5 sampling sites used in previous studies, data from 24 sites better describe the spatial patterns and the influence of potential source areas, and provide more robust estimates of levels across the lake. ΣPAH14 concentrations, which ranged from 210 to 1290 ng/g dw, were highest at near-shore industrialized and contaminated areas. Overall, PAH levels in sediments have been declining for the past three decades, and only low risks to benthic organisms are indicated using consensus-based SQGs. We provide the first report of NPAHs in Lake Michigan sediments. ΣNPAH5 concentrations ranged from 3 to 19 ng/g dw, and several highly toxic compounds were detected, including 6-nitrochrysene. ΣHopane5 and ΣSterane6 concentrations ranged from 98 to 355 ng/g and 6 to 36 ng/g dw, respectively, and several petroleum-specific hopanes were detected. OC-adjusted SVOC concentrations increase at locations near AOCs and larger urban/industrial areas.

The estimated 2011 loading rates of ΣPAH14, ΣNPAH5, ΣSterane6 and ΣHopane5 to open water sediments of Lake Michigan are 10.9, 0.16, 0.25 and 3.6 t/yr, respectively. The PAH loading estimate has excellent agreement with prior estimates obtained using different and independent methods; loading rates for the other three compound groups are the first presented in the literature. Relative abundances were similar across sites, indicating that common source types affected sediments across southern Lake Michigan. Based on diagnostic ratios and chemical mass balance modeling, PAHs were contributed by primarily pyrogenic sources, e.g., coal combustion and vehicle exhaust; coal-tar sealed pavement dust was also identified. Based on hopane biomarkers, both petroleum-derived and biogenic sources are important contributors of hydrocarbons in sediments. Finally, NPAH compounds with high carcinogenic potencies (e.g., 6-nitrochrysene) were measured at modest concentrations in sediments, suggesting that an assessment of ecological risks may be warranted.

Supplementary Material

01
02

Highlights.

  • 37 SVOCs are measured in 24 surface sediment samples from southern Lake Michigan.

  • PAH levels have declined by three to four folds since the 1980s.

  • Carcinogenic nitro-PAHs are detected and are widely distributed.

  • OC-adjusted SVOC concentrations in open water sediments show gradients from sources.

  • The major sources of PAHs are vehicle exhaust, coal combustion and coal-tar sealcoat.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Thomas Nalepa and other personnel at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory for collection of sediment samples. We also thank Dongyan Sun for helping with the processing and analysis of sediment samples. This study was supported in part by US EPA grant GL00E00690-0, entitled PAHs, Nitro-PAHs & Diesel Exhaust Toxics in the Great Lakes: Apportionments, Impacts and Risks. The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health provided additional support in grant P30ES017885 entitled Lifestage Exposures and Adult Disease.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest to be declared.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

References

  • 1.Albinet A, Leoz-Garziandia E, Budzinski H, ViIlenave E. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), nitrated PAHs and oxygenated PAHs in ambient air of the Marseilles area (South of France): concentrations and sources. Science of the Total Environment. 2007;384:280–292. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andren AW, Strand J. Atmospheric deposition of particulate organic carbon and polyaromatic hydrocarbon to Lake Michigan. In: Eisenreich SJ, editor. Atmospheric Pollutants in Natural Waters. Ann Arbor Sciecne; Ann Arbor, MI: 1979. pp. 459–479. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) (Update) Atlanta, GA: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry; 1995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baek S, Field R, Goldstone M, Kirk P, Lester J, Perry R. A review of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: sources, fate and behavior. Water, air, and soil pollution. 1991;60:279–300. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bamford HA, Baker JE. Nitro-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations and sources in urban and suburban atmospheres of the Mid-Atlantic region. Atmospheric Environment. 2003;37:2077–2091. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Beyea J, Stellman SD, Hatch M, Gammon MD. Airborne Emissions from 1961 to 2004 of Benzo [a] pyrene from US Vehicles per km of Travel Based on Tunnel Studies. Environmental science & technology. 2008;42:7315–7320. doi: 10.1021/es8000773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bieger T, Hellou J, Abrajano TA. Petroleum biomarkers as tracers of lubricating oil contamination. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1996;32:270–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boitsov S, Petrova V, Jensen HK, Kursheva A, Litvinenko I, Chen Y, et al. Petroleum-related hydrocarbons in deep and subsurface sediments from South-Western Barents Sea. Marine environmental research. 2011;71:357–368. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2011.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Budzinski H, Jones I, Bellocq J, Pierard C, Garrigues P. Evaluation of sediment contamination by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Gironde estuary. Marine chemistry. 1997;58:85–97. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bzdusek PA, Christensen ER, Li A, Zou Q. Source apportionment of sediment PAHs in Lake Calumet, Chicago: Application of factor analysis with nonnegative constraints. Environmental science & technology. 2004;38:97–103. doi: 10.1021/es034842k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.CFR. Code of Federal Regulations Title 40 Part 423 Appendix A: 126 Priority Pollutants. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration; Washington, D.C: 1982. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Christensen ER, Arora S. Source apportionment of PAHs in sediments using factor analysis by time records: Application to Lake Michigan, USA. Water Research. 2007;41:168–176. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Christensen ER, Rachdawong P, Karls JF, Camp RPV. PAHs in sediments: Unmixing and CMB modeling of sources. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 1999;125:1022–1032. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Corcoran MB. Earth and Environmental Sciences. Master of Science. University of Illinois; Chicago: 2013. Variations in Sedimentation Rate and Sediment Focusing in Lake Michigan Using Radionuclide Profiles. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cox ON, Clements WH. An integrated assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and benthic macroinvertebrate communities in Isle Royale National Park. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2013;39:74–82. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crane JL. Source Apportionment and Distribution of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Risk Considerations, and Management Implications for Urban Stormwater Pond Sediments in Minnesota, USA. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2014:176–200. doi: 10.1007/s00244-013-9963-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Crane JL, Grosenheider K, Wilson CB. Contamination of stormwater pond sediments by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Minnesota: The role of coal tar-based sealcoat products as a source of PAHs. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.de Castro Vasconcellos P, Sanchez-Ccoyllo O, Balducci C, Mabilia R, Cecinato A. Occurrence and concentration levels of nitro-PAH in the air of three Brazilian cities experiencing different emission impacts. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2008;190:87–94. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.De Vault DS, Hesselberg R, Rodgers PW, Feist TJ. Contaminant trends in lake trout and walleye from the Laurentian Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 1996;22:884–895. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Deglo De Besses B. XonGrid 3 Interpolation Add-in. 2013 http://xongrid.sourceforge.net.
  • 21.Eadie BJ, Landrum PF, Faust W. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments, pore water and the amphipodPontoporeia hoyifrom Lake Michigan. Chemosphere. 1982;11:847–858. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.EPA. Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sediments (ARCS) Program: Final Summary Report. U.S. Enivronmental Protection Agency; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.EPA. Lake Michigan Lakewide Management Plan. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.EPA. Chemical Mass Balance Model EPA-CMB8.2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, D.C: 2004a. http://www.epa.gov/scram001/receptor_cmb.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.EPA. EPA-CMB8.2 Users Manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; Research Triangle Park, NC: 2004b. EPA-452/R-04-011. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.EPA. National Coastal Condition Assessment: Laboratory Methods Manual. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water; Washington, D.C: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.EPA. Great Lakes Areas of Concern. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Washington, D.C: 2013. http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/ [Google Scholar]
  • 28.EPA&EC. Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy: Canada - United States Strategy for the Virtual Elimination of Persistent Toxic Substances in the Great Lakes. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency & Environmental Canada; 2004. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fernandez P, Grifoll M, Solanas AM, Bayona JM, Albaiges J. Bioassay-directed chemical analysis of genotoxic components in coastal sediments. Environmental science & technology. 1992;26:817–829. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Galarneau E. Source specificity and atmospheric processing of airborne PAHs: implications for source apportionment. Atmospheric Environment. 2008;42:8139–8149. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ghosh U, Zimmerman JR, Luthy RG. PCB and PAH speciation among particle types in contaminated harbor sediments and effects on PAH bioavailability. Environmental science & technology. 2003;37:2209–2217. doi: 10.1021/es020833k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Gschwend PM, Hites RA. Fluxes of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to marine and lacustrine sediments in the northeastern United States. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 1981;45:2359–2367. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hahladakis J, Smaragdaki E, Vasilaki G, Gidarakos E. Use of Sediment Quality Guidelines and pollution indicators for the assessment of heavy metal and PAH contamination in Greek surficial sea and lake sediments. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2013;185:2843–2853. doi: 10.1007/s10661-012-2754-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harrison RM, Smith D, Luhana L. Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, UK. Environmental Science & Technology. 1996;30:825–832. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Hayakawa K, Tang N, Akutsu K, Murahashi T, Kakimoto H, Kizu R, et al. Comparison of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitropolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in airborne particulates collected in downtown and suburban Kanazawa, Japan. Atmospheric Environment. 2002;36:5535–5541. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Helfrich J, Armstrong DE. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of the southern basin of Lake Michigan. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 1986;12:192–199. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hostettler FD, Rapp JB, Kvenvolden KA. Use of geochemical biomarkers in bottom sediment to track oil from a spill, San Francisco Bay, California. Marine pollution bulletin. 1992;24:15–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang L, Bohac SV, Chernyak SM, Batterman SA. Composition and Integrity of PAHs, Nitro-PAHs, Hopanes, and Steranes in Diesel Exhaust Particulate Matter. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution. 2013;224:1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11270-013-1630-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jautzy J, Ahad JM, Gobeil C, Savard MM. Century-long source apportionment of PAHs in Athabasca oil sands region lakes using diagnostic ratios and compound-specific carbon isotope signatures. Environmental science & technology. 2013;47:6155–6163. doi: 10.1021/es400642e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kannan K, Lee Kober J, Kang YS, Masunaga S, Nakanishi J, Ostaszewski A, et al. Polychlorinated naphthalenes, biphenyls, dibenzo-p-dioxins, and dibenzofurans as well as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and alkylphenols in sediment from the Detroit and Rouge Rivers, Michigan, USA. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2001;20:1878–1889. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Karickhoff SW. Semi-empirical estimation of sorption of hydrophobic pollutants on natural sediments and soils. Chemosphere. 1981;10:833–846. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Katsoyiannis A, Sweetman AJ, Jones KC. PAH molecular diagnostic ratios applied to atmospheric sources: a critical evaluation using two decades of source inventory and air concentration data from the UK. Environmental science & technology. 2011;45:8897–8906. doi: 10.1021/es202277u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kemble N, Hardesty D, Ingersoll C, Johnson B, Dwyer F, MacDonald D. An evaluation of the toxicity of contaminated sediments from Waukegan Harbor, Illinois, following remediation. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2000;39:452–461. doi: 10.1007/s002440010127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khalek IA, Bougher TL, Merritt PM, Zielinska B. Regulated and unregulated emissions from highway heavy-duty diesel engines complying with US Environmental Protection Agency 2007 emissions standards. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association. 2011;61:427–442. doi: 10.3155/1047-3289.61.4.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kleeman MJ, Riddle SG, Robert MA, Jakober CA. Lubricating oil and fuel contributions to particulate matter emissions from light-duty gasoline and heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology. 2007;42:235–242. doi: 10.1021/es071054c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Kruge M, Mukhopadhyay P, Lewis C. A molecular evaluation of contaminants and natural organic matter in bottom sediments from western Lake Ontario. Organic geochemistry. 1998;29:1797–1812. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kveseth K, Sortland B, Bokn T. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sewage, mussels and tap water. Chemosphere. 1982;11:623–639. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Levengood JM, Schaeffer DJ. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in fish and crayfish from the Calumet region of southwestern Lake Michigan. Ecotoxicology. 2011;20:1411–1421. doi: 10.1007/s10646-011-0698-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Li A, Jang JK, Scheff PA. Application of EPA CMB8, 2 model for source apportionment of sediment PAHs in Lake Calumet, Chicago. Environmental Science & Technology. 2003;37:2958–2965. doi: 10.1021/es026309v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li CT, Mi HH, Lee WJ, You WC, Wang YF. PAH emission from the industrial boilers. Journal of hazardous materials. 1999;69:1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00097-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Liang Y, Tse M, Young L, Wong M. Distribution patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the sediments and fish at Mai Po Marshes Nature Reserve, Hong Kong. Water Research. 2007;41:1303–1311. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Librando V, Fazzino S. Quantification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their nitro derivatives in atmospheric particulate matter of Augusta city. Chemosphere. 1993;27:1649–1656. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Liu ZG, Berg DR, Vasys VN, Dettmann ME, Zielinska B, Schauer JJ. Analysis of C1, C2, and C10 through C33 particle-phase and semi-volatile organic compound emissions from heavy-duty diesel engines. Atmos Environ. 2010;44:1108–1115. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Lübcke-von Varel U, Bataineh M, Lohrmann S, Löffler I, Schulze T, Flückiger-Isler S, et al. Identification and quantitative confirmation of dinitropyrenes and 3-nitrobenzanthrone as major mutagens in contaminated sediments. Environment international. 2012;44:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Lubcke-von Varel U, Machala M, Ciganek M, Neca J, Pencikova K, Palkova L, et al. Polar compounds dominate in vitro effects of sediment extracts. Environmental science & technology. 2011;45:2384–2390. doi: 10.1021/es103381y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.MacDonald D, Ingersoll C, Smorong D, Lindskoog R, Sparks D, Smith J, et al. An assessment of injury to sediments and sediment-dwelling organisms in the Grand Calumet River and Indiana Harbor Area of Concern, USA. Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology. 2002;43:141–155. doi: 10.1007/s00244-001-0052-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mackenzie A, Brassell S, Eglinton G, Maxwell J. Chemical fossils: the geological fate of steroids. Science. 1982;217:491. doi: 10.1126/science.217.4559.491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Manan N, Raza M, Yuh YS, Theng LW, Zakaria MP. Distribution of petroleum hydrocarbons in aquaculture fish from selected locations in the Straits of Malacca, Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2011;14:14–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.MDH. Varney Pond: Stormwater Settling Pond Sediments. St. Paul, MN: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Meyers PA, Ishiwatari R. Lacustrine organic geochemistry—an overview of indicators of organic matter sources and diagenesis in lake sediments. Organic geochemistry. 1993;20:867–900. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Neff JM. Sources, Fates and Biological Effects. London, UK: Applied Science Publishers Ltd; 1979. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in The Aquatic Environment. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Neff JM, Durell GS. Bioaccumulation of petroleum hydrocarbons in arctic amphipods in the oil development area of the Alaskan Beaufort Sea. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2012;8:301–319. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nevers MB, Whitman RL, Gerovac PJ. History and environmental setting of the Grand Calumet River. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science. 2013;108:3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Nisbet IC, LaGoy PK. Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology. 1992;16:290–300. doi: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90009-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ourisson G, Rohmer M. Hopanoids. 2. Biohopanoids: a novel class of bacterial lipids. Accounts of Chemical Research. 1992;25:403–408. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Ourisson G, Rohmer M, Poralla K. Prokaryotic hopanoids and other polyterpenoid sterol surrogates. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 1987;41:301–333. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.41.100187.001505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Ozaki N, Takemoto N, Kindaichi T. Nitro-PAHs and PAHs in atmospheric particulate matters and sea sediments in Hiroshima Bay Area, Japan. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 2010;207:263–271. [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Perrini G, Tomasello M, Librando V, Minniti Z. Nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the environment: formation, occurrences and analysis. Annali di chimica. 2005;95:567–577. doi: 10.1002/adic.200590066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Pistikopoulos P, Masclet P, Mouvier G. A receptor model adapted to reactive species: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; evaluation of source contributions in an open urban site—I. particle compounds. Atmospheric Environment Part A General Topics. 1990;24:1189–1197. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Prince RC, Elmendorf DL, Lute JR, Hsu CS, Haith CE, Senius JD, et al. 17. alpha.(H)-21. beta (H)-hopane as a conserved internal marker for estimating the biodegradation of crude oil. Environmental science & technology. 1994;28:142–145. doi: 10.1021/es00050a019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Qu W, Xue B, Su C, Wang S. Evaluation of biogenic and anthropogenic inputs of aliphatic hydrocarbons to Lake Taihu sediments using biomarkers. Hydrobiologia. 2007;581:89–95. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Reisen F, Arey J. Atmospheric reactions influence seasonal PAH and nitro-PAH concentrations in the Los Angeles basin. Environmental science & technology. 2005;39:64–73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.RIDEM. Rhode Island Air Toxics Guideline. State of Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management; Providence, RI: 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Sato T, Kato K, Ose Y, Nagase H, Ishikawa T. Nitroarenes in Suimon river sediment. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology. 1985;157:135–143. doi: 10.1016/0165-1218(85)90108-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Schantz MM, Porter BJ, Wise SA. Stability of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Frozen Mussel Tissue. Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds. 2001;19:253–262. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Schauer JJ, Kleeman MJ, Cass GR, Simoneit BR. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 2. C1 through C30 organic compounds from medium duty diesel trucks. Environmental Science & Technology. 1999;33:1578–1587. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Schauer JJ, Kleeman MJ, Cass GR, Simoneit BR. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 3. C1–C29 organic compounds from fireplace combustion of wood. Environmental Science & Technology. 2001;35:1716–1728. doi: 10.1021/es001331e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Schauer JJ, Kleeman MJ, Cass GR, Simoneit BR. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 5. C1–C32 organic compounds from gasoline-powered motor vehicles. Environmental science & technology. 2002;36:1169–1180. doi: 10.1021/es0108077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Schneider AR, Stapleton HM, Cornwell J, Baker JE. Recent declines in PAH, PCB, and toxaphene levels in the northern Great Lakes as determined from high resolution sediment cores. Environmental science & technology. 2001;35:3809–3815. doi: 10.1021/es002044d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Simcik MF, Eisenreich SJ, Golden KA, Liu SP, Lipiatou E, Swackhamer DL, et al. Atmospheric loading of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to Lake Michigan as recorded in the sediments. Environmental science & technology. 1996;30:3039–3046. [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Simcik MF, Eisenreich SJ, Lioy PJ. Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and Lake Michigan. Atmospheric Environment. 1999;33:5071–5079. [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Su MC, Christensen ER, Karls JF. Determination of PAH sources in dated sediments from Green Bay, Wisconsin, by a chemical mass balance model. Environmental Pollution. 1998;99:411–419. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(97)00182-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Sun P, Backus S, Blanchard P, Hites RA. Annual variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in precipitation collected near the Great Lakes. Environmental science & technology. 2006a;40:696–701. doi: 10.1021/es0514949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sun P, Blanchard P, Brice KA, Hites RA. Trends in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in the Great Lakes atmosphere. Environmental science & technology. 2006b;40:6221–6227. doi: 10.1021/es0607279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Szalinska E, Drouillard KG, Anderson EJ, Haffner GD. Factors influencing contaminant distribution in the Huron-Erie Corridor sediments. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2011;37:132–139. [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tang N, Hattori T, Taga R, Igarashi K, Yang X, Tamura K, et al. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitropolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban air particulates and their relationship to emission sources in the Pan–Japan Sea countries. Atmospheric Environment. 2005;39:5817–5826. [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Thurston GD, Spengler JD. A quantitative assessment of source contributions to inhalable particulate matter pollution in metropolitan Boston. Atmospheric Environment (1967) 1985;19:9–25. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Tokiwa H, Nakagawa R, Morita K, Ohnishi Y. Mutagenicity of nitro derivatives induced by exposure of aromatic compounds to nitrogen dioxide. Mutation Research/Environmental Mutagenesis and Related Subjects. 1981;85:195–205. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(81)90036-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.USEPA. Field Sampling Guidance Document #1215: Sediment Sampling. Rev. 1. U.S. EPA Region 9 Laboratory; Richmond, CA: 1999. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.van Dongen BE, Rowland HA, Gault AG, Polya DA, Bryant C, Pancost RD. Hopane, sterane and< i> n</i>-alkane distributions in shallow sediments hosting high arsenic groundwaters in Cambodia. Applied Geochemistry. 2008;23:3047–3058. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Van Metre P, Mahler BJ, Burbank TL, Wilson JT. Collection and Analysis of Samples for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Dust and Other Solids Related to Sealed and Unsealed Pavement from 10 Cities Across the United States, 2005–07. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Van Metre PC, Mahler BJ. Contribution of PAHs from coal–tar pavement sealcoat and other sources to 40 US lakes. Science of the total environment. 2010;409:334–344. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.08.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Van Metre PC, Majewski MS, Mahler BJ, Foreman WT, Braun CL, Wilson JT, et al. Volatilization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from coal-tar-sealed pavement. Chemosphere. 2012;88:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Wang Q, Li Y, Wang Y. Optimizing the weight loss-on-ignition methodology to quantify organic and carbonate carbon of sediments from diverse sources. Environmental monitoring and assessment. 2011a;174:241–257. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1454-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang XC, Sun S, Ma HQ, Liu Y. Sources and distribution of aliphatic and polyaromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of Jiaozhou Bay, Qingdao, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2006;52:129–138. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Wang Z, Yang C, Yang Z, Sun J, Hollebone B, Brown C, et al. Forensic fingerprinting and source identification of the 2009 Sarnia (Ontario) oil spill. Journal of Environmental Monitoring. 2011b;13:3004–3017. doi: 10.1039/c1em10620a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.WDNR. Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines: Recommendations for Use & Application. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources; Madison, WI: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Xiong Y, Wu F, Fang J, Wang L, Li Y, Liao H. Organic geochemical record of environmental changes in Lake Dianchi, China. Journal of Paleolimnology. 2010;44:217–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yaffe D, Cohen Y, Arey J, Grosovsky AJ. Multimedia analysis of PAHs and nitro-PAH daughter products in the Los Angeles basin. Risk Analysis. 2001;21:275–294. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.212111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Yunker MB, Macdonald RW, Vingarzan R, Mitchell RH, Goyette D, Sylvestre S. PAHs in the Fraser River basin: a critical appraisal of PAH ratios as indicators of PAH source and composition. Organic Geochemistry. 2002;33:489–515. [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhang X, Christensen ER, Gin MF. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in dated sediments from Green Bay and Lake Michigan. Estuaries. 1993;16:638–652. [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhang Y, Guo CS, Xu J, Tian YZ, Shi GL, Feng YC. Potential source contributions and risk assessment of PAHs in sediments from Taihu Lake, China: comparison of three receptor models. Water research. 2012;46:3065–3073. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

01
02

RESOURCES