Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 17.
Published in final edited form as: Immunol Res. 2011 Apr;49(0):269–280. doi: 10.1007/s12026-010-8188-4

Immunologic aspects of monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis

Mark C Lanasa 1, J Brice Weinberg 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC4102133  NIHMSID: NIHMS596324  PMID: 21161696

Abstract

Monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a preclinical hematologic condition wherein small numbers of clonal B cells can be detected in the blood of otherwise healthy individuals. Most MBL have a surface immunophenotype nearly identical to that of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), though other phenotypes can also be identified. MBL has been shown to be a precursor state for CLL, but most MBL clones are quite small and apparently have minimal potential to progress of CLL or other B cell lymphoproliferative disorder (B-LPD). The investigation of MBL as a precursor state for CLL will likely lead to important insights into mechanisms of disease pathogenesis. The review will cover clinical and translational aspects of MBL, with a particular emphasis on the prevalence of MBL; the relationship between MBL, CLL, and other B-LPDs; and the capacity of MBL to modulate the normal B and T cell compartments.

Keywords: Monoclonal B Lymphocytosis, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, B Cell Receptor, B Cell Development

Introduction

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent hematologic malignancy in the United States, with approximately 15,000 new cases per year and 95,000 affected individuals [1]. Although CLL is treatable, it remains incurable. Despite years of thoughtful and detailed investigation, much remains unknown regarding the etiology of CLL (reviewed by Chiorazzi [2]). In 2002, it was first observed that small numbers of CLL-phenotype B cells could be identified in the blood of otherwise healthy individuals with normal blood counts [3]. This phenomenon was termed monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis (MBL). Since these first reports, MBL has been shown to be a precursor state for CLL [4, 5]. While MBL is a precursor of CLL, the overwhelming majority of MBL apparently do not progress to CLL. The identification of a precursor state for CLL has created an opportunity to investigate the immunologic and molecular characteristics of pre-emergent CLL. Through careful study of this forme fruste of CLL, it is anticipated that critical aspects of the etiology of CLL will become clear.

MBL Prevalence

MBL was first identified through a program of systematic screening of 910 individuals over age 40 years with normal blood counts presenting for outpatient medical care to non-hematology clinics. In this cohort, the prevalence of MBL was 3.5%, a population prevalence at least 100-fold more common than CLL. Similar to CLL, the frequency of MBL increased with age. The MBL cells showed a typical CLL immunophenotype: CD5+, CD19+, CD20dim, CD23+, CD79bdim, and were clonal as determined by restricted expression of surface immunoglobulin light chains [3]. A subsequent report by this same group in Leeds, UK observed a four-fold higher in prevalence of MBL (13.5%) among unaffected family members ascertained from CLL kindreds, suggesting that MBL may also be a marker for inherited predisposition to CLL [6]. These first reports identified four parameters as the principal determinants of the prevalence of MBL: (1) the presence or absence of an absolute lymphocytosis, (2) the age of the population under investigation, (3) the detection sensitivity of the flow cytometry assay employed, and (4) the presence or absence of a family history of CLL.

As flow cytometry methods became increasingly sensitive, incrementally smaller MBL clones became detectable. In the initial population screening report by Rawstron et al that identified MBL in 3.5% of individuals screened, a four color flow cytometry assay was utilized, and 2.0 × 105 events were collected [3]. This method yields an approximate detection sensitivity of 1 MBL (CLL phenotype) cell per 1 × 105 events. Using a very similar methodology (4 color flow, 2.0 × 105 events), Ghia and co-workers found the prevalence of MBL to be 5.5% in a cohort of 500 primary care patients in Italy [7]. A subsequent study by the same group in Italy that employed a more sensitive flow method (5 colors, 5.0 × 105 events) found a slightly higher rate of MBL of 7.4% among 1,725 individuals participating in a population screening program. Conversely, a study performed in the United States that screened 1,926 individuals as part of a population screening program that utilized a less sensitive 2 color flow cytometry assay found a MBL prevalence of only 0.6% [8]. Most recently, a study evaluating 608 primary care patients in Spain using an 8 color flow assay and collecting 5.0 × 106 events found the prevalence of MBL to be 12% [9]. These apparently divergent prevalence values are easily reconciled when assay sensitivity is considered. For example, the assay used in the Spanish study had a detection sensitivity at least one order of magnitude greater than that employed in the early UK and Italian studies, and approximately 2/3 of the MBL clones detected in the Spanish study were smaller than the maximum detection sensitivity of the flow cytometry assay employed in the earlier studies. Recently, all of these groups, including our group at Duke University, have pooled our screening data and show very similar MBL prevalence at a similar level of detection sensitivity [10, 11].

MBL is more common among the unaffected first degree relatives of CLL patients, suggesting that MBL may be a marker of inherited predisposition for CLL [6, 12, 13]. As part of our ongoing research within the Genetic Epidemiology of CLL Consortium, a collaboration of researchers from seven institutions with the overall aim of investigating the genetic basis of CLL through the collection of CLL families, we recently reported the prevalence of MBL to be 17% in a cohort of 505 unaffected relatives of CLL patients [14]. The high prevalence in this report is likely due to ascertainment, because only first degree relatives over 40 years of age from families with two documented cases of CLL (high-risk CLL) were included. Age remains an important factor among MBL ascertained from CLL kindreds; the prevalence of MBL increased with age and was over 60% among individuals over 90 years of age [14]. Matos et al recently reported the prevalence of MBL to be 6% among a relatively small cohort of 113 unaffected first degree relatives of sporadic (non-familial CLL) over age 40 [14a]. Interestingly, the rate of MBL among relatives over age 60 was 15% suggesting that MBL prevalence in “sporadic” and “familial” MBL is comparable and may have shared genetic determinants. Emerging data supports this hypothesis; a case-control single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association study of 10 SNPs associated with inherited risk for CLL showed that 9 of 10 SNPs were also associated with risk of development of MBL, and 6 of these associations were statistically significant [15]. This finding suggests that inherited risk to CLL may be conferred by inherited risk to MBL.

Types of MBL

While the initial reports of MBL focused on the identification of CLL phenotype cells, other apparently less common phenotypes were subsequently identified. Ghia et al described three different forms of MBL in the report of 500 outpatients over age 65 in Italy [7] ( Table 1). (I) “CLL-like” MBL was the most common, with 22 cases observed. Three cases showed an (II) “atypical CLL-like” phenotype: CD5+, CD10, CD19+, CD20high, CD23+, CD79bdim, IgMdim. This phenotype does not have a clear correlate either among normal B cells or in B cell lymphoproliferative disorders. It is most consistent with CLL with an atypical immunophenotype or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Because CD23 was expressed in all cases, pre-emergent MCL was considered less likely. The third form of MBL described was (III) “CD5neg” or “non-CLL like” MBL, observed in 7 cases with a phenotype showing: CD5, CD10, CD19+, CD20+, CD23, FMC7+, CD79b+. Because these cells fall within in a normal B cell compartment on a CD5 by CD19 or CD5 by CD20 flow cytometry plot, skewing of the ratio of surface immunoglobulin κ : λ of > 3:1 or < 0.3 : 1 was required for identification. Therefore, unlike CLL-like or atypical MBL (both of which can be detected at very low levels), CD5 MBL clones must comprise a significant proportion of the normal B cell compartment to be detected. This immunophenotype is not specific for any single B-LPD; it is potentially consistent with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL), and hairy cell leukemia (HCL). Familial clustering of CLL, LPL, and HCL has been described, so further characterization of this likely heterogeneous group of MBLs is of interest [16].

Table 1.

Subtypes of MBL

MBL Type Immunophenotype Relative proportion in a population cohort (%) [7] Relative proportion in a familial CLL cohort (%) [14]
CD5 CD10 CD19 CD20 CD23 sIg
CLL Phenotype + neg + dim + dim 69 86
Atypical CLL Phenotype + neg + + +/dim + 9 8
Non-CLL Phenotype neg neg + + neg + 22 6

The relative proportion of these MBL subtypes in different populations remains an area of active investigation. In our recent report of familial-CLL associated MBL, 86 MBL were identified among 505 study participants. Of these, the majority (74 of 86, 86%) were “CLL-phenotype”, 7 were “Atypical-CLL phenotype” (7 of 86, 8%), and 5 were “Non-CLL phenotype” (5 of 86, 6%) [14] It is possible that the proportion of CLL-like MBL is enriched among individuals with a family history of CLL. The relative proportion of different MBL subtypes may well be different in population studies or among individuals with a family history of NHL rather than CLL.

The term MBL is now used to describe all types of clonal B cell populations detectable in blood. However, since most MBL are CLL-phenotype, there is the potential for confusion when comparing data series depending on whether all subtypes are included. Therefore, efforts have been made regarding consensus nomenclature for these different groups [17, 18]. As initially described by Ghia et al, three groups are defined: (I) “CLL-phenotype”, in which an immunophenotype showing CD5+, CD19+, CD20dim, CD23+, and sIgdim is required; ( II) “Atypical CLL-phenotype”, in which a CD5+, CD19+ population is present with bright expression of either CD20 or sIg, or dim expression of CD23 is present; and (III) “Non-CLL phenotype”, in which the immunophenotype is CD5, CD19+, CD20+, sIghigh, and skewing of the κ : λ ratio is required. For the remainder of this review, only “CLL-phenotype” MBL will be considered, and as such, hereafter the term MBL will be used synonymously with this subtype.

The Relationship between MBL and CLL

Over the past 30 years, the diagnostic criteria for CLL have changed significantly. The availability of automated blood counters, the identification of CD5 positivity as a hallmark feature of CLL, and the recent widespread application of flow cytometry all contributed to the improved diagnostic specificity and sensitivity for CLL. This ultimately led to establishment of a minimum value required for a diagnosis of CLL in the NCI-96 guidelines of an absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) of 5.0 × 109/ L [19]. This diagnostic criterion was derived largely from detection sensitivity rather than clinical outcome, and it was subsequently appreciated that this diagnostic value did not correlate well with future need for CLL-directed therapy. Therefore, in the recent International Workshop on CLL (iwCLL) 2008 revision of the NCI-96 guidelines, the diagnostic threshold for CLL was changed to a B-cell lymphocyte count (B-ALC, rather than ALC) of 5.0 × 109/ L [20]. This value correlates better with relevant clinical outcomes, such as need for CLL-directed therapy.

In the iwCLL 2008 guidelines, MBL was specifically defined as the presence of a CLL phenotype population with < 5.0 × 109B cells / L in blood in the absence of any other disease-related symptoms or clinical findings [20]. One intriguing aspect of this shift in diagnostic criteria was that some individuals previously diagnosed as stage 0 CLL became reclassified as MBL. Shanafelt et al performed an analysis of 459 patients presenting to the Mayo clinic with MBL or Rai stage 0 CLL. Although patients classified as MBL under the current schema were less likely to require CLL-directed therapy than patients with Rai 0 CLL, the authors determined that a B-ALC of 11.0 × 109 / L provided the best cut-off for both need for future CLL-directed therapy and overall survival [21]. Confirmatory independent datasets will likely lead to further refinement of the minimum B-ALC and improved diagnostic ability to distinguish CLL and MBL.

While the Shanafelt et al study studied a retrospective cohort of patients who were previously considered Rai 0 CLL under the NCI-96 formulation, a central question was whether MBL would progress to CLL, and if so at what rate. By combining a group of MBL identified through population screening of 1,520 individuals and a series of MBL identified through diagnostic evaluation of 2,228 patients with an absolute lymphocytosis, Rawstron et al identified a cohort of 387 MBL that could be followed prospectively for evolution to CLL and for need of CLL-directed therapy. Longitudinal analysis with a median follow-up of 6.7 years of these individuals with MBL showed that among 185 participants with an absolute lymphocytosis, CLL developed in 28 (15%), and CLL-directed chemotherapy was required in 13 (7%). The annualized cumulative risk of MBL progression to need for CLL directed therapy was 1.1% per year. There were only 4 CLL-attributable deaths in the entire cohort during the period of follow-up. Similarly, in a retrospective analysis of 302 patients newly identified MBL (predominantly patients considered Rai 0 under the NCI-96 formulation) presenting to the Mayo clinic, Shanafelt et al observed that 1.4% per year (7 % total) of the study subjects with MBL required CLL-directed therapy within 5 years of diagnosis [22]. The B-ALC was the most important determinant of risk for future need for CLL-directed therapy in both the Rawstron et al and Shanafelt et al studies, with individuals with a B-ALC < 1.9 × 109/ L at very low risk for progression to CLL [4, 22].

These translational outcomes studies of MBL showed that the most important determinant of MBL progression was the B lymphocyte count at diagnosis. The majority of MBL cases with an absolute lymphocytosis at identification are found through a clinical referral for diagnostic evaluation of an abnormal complete blood count. However, analysis of population-based screening for MBL suggests that 95% of all MBL have a CLL-phenotype cell count < 56 × 106 cells / L and 75% have an MBL cell count < 3 × 106 cells / L. Thus MBL with lymphocytosis is very rare in the general population [23]. The observation of a small MBL clone (< 100 × 106 cells / L) observed in conjunction with otherwise normal B-ALC has been termed “low count MBL” by Dagklis et al [9, 24]. The majority of individuals followed in the Rawstron et al and Shanafelt et al clinical studies were “high count MBL” (i.e., an absolute B cell lymphocytosis was present), so the biology and natural history of small MBL clones remains unclear. The excess risk of progression to need for CLL-directed therapy for individuals with low count MBL is currently believed to be negligible.

Another important clinical question regarding MBL is whether CLL is always preceded by an MBL phase. To investigate this question, Landgren et al studied 45 participants from the Prostate, Lung, Colon, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial who developed CLL after enrolling in this prospective observational cohort [5]. These 45 CLL cases were identified from the 77,469 participants in this nationwide study. All 45 of these study subjects had cryopreserved blood samples that were archived for the PLCO study prior to their diagnosis of CLL, and these samples predated the diagnosis of CLL by up to 6.4 years. Using 6 color flow cytometry screening and reverse transcriptase PCR, MBL was identified in 44 or 45 CLL (98%) cases, and the MBL clone was detectable by both PCR and flow cytometry in 91% of cases. This strongly supports the hypothesis that MBL precedes essentially all cases of CLL [5].

Biologic Insights from the B Cell Receptor

Investigation of the B cell receptor (BCR) has yielded insights that are central to the current understanding of CLL (reviewed by Caligaris-Cappio [25]). First, despite the tremendous potential breadth of the immunoglobulin gene repertoire, patients with CLL use a highly restricted set of BCRs [26, 27]. Furthermore, stereotypy, the observation of nearly identical complementarity determining region 3 (CDR3) sequences between CLL cases, is observed among a significant minority of CLL cases. These observations led to the hypothesis that tonic stimulation by stereotyped auto- or alloantigens drives expansion of the malignant clone in CLL [25, 28, 29]. Second, patients with mutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGVH) genes follow a more indolent disease course than those with unmutated IGVH [30]. It was initially suggested that CLL may be two distinct entities: one deriving from naïve (IGVH unmutated) B cells, and the other from post-germinal center memory (IGVH mutated) B cells. However, gene expression profiling studies in CLL show that both IGVH mutated and unmutated CLL are derived from memory B cells [31, 32]. The origin of IGVH unmutated CLL remains controversial. Chiorazzi and others have proposed that unmutated CLL arise from B cells that mature through a T cell independent pathway [2]. Third, BCR-mediated signaling is possibly the key determinant of CLL biology. CLL is characterized by enhanced activation of BCR downstream intracellular signaling pathways, and the capacity of CLL cells to upregulate BCR-mediated signaling correlates with the mutation status of the IGVH [33]. Given the significance of the BCR in CLL biology, investigation of the BCR in MBL is of significant interest.

To determine the IGVH usage and mutation status in MBL, we purified single MBL cells by FACS sorting from a series of individuals with MBL ascertained from familial CLL kindreds [12]. The immunoglobulin heavy and light chain sequences were obtained from genomic DNA after whole genome amplification and immunoglobulin gene-specific nested PCR. This detailed characterization was performed on six “low count” MBL cases, and several interesting features were noted. The IGVH genes used were typically mutated and included families commonly observed in CLL, with VH families 3–07, 3–15, and 4–34 observed in multiple individuals. When observed in CLL, these VH families are associated with a favorable prognosis. In addition, 4 of the 6 MBL cases were oligoclonal, rather than truly monoclonal, with 2 to 4 apparently unrelated MBL clones present in the same individual.

In approximately 3% of IGVH mutated CLL, clonally related subgroups of leukemic cells with progressive IGVH gene mutations can be identified [34]. We identified progressive immunoglobulin gene mutation in one of the low count MBL subjects. This VH3-07, D3-10 clone from one subject consisted of related subgroups of MBL that shared the same immunoglobulin gene rearrangements and some somatic mutations, but also had several partially shared mutations. The MBL immunoglobulin gene rearrangements could be placed into a genealogical tree in which sequentially related clones were ordered based on sequence homology with the germline sequence and subsequent contiguous clones with progressive somatic mutations (Figure 1). MBL clones arranged in the genealogical tree furthest away from the putative germline immunoglobulin sequence had evidence of antigen-driven immunoglobulin sequence changes [35]. We and others have suggested that similar clonally-related subgroups from CLL cases represent antigen-driven refinement of the BCR [34, 36, 37]. We believe that evidence of oligoclonal diversification favors an antigen-driven process for some subjects with MBL.

Figure 1. Antigen-driven intraclonal diversification in an MBL subject.

Figure 1

Agenealogical analysis of related MBL oligoclonal subgroups based on an analysis of single cells and analysis of the rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain from each MBL cell subgroup (adapted from reference 12). Letters A – M represent individual subgroups of MBL cells with a related immunoglobulin heavy chain gene sequence containing 1 to 10 single cell clones per subgroup. GL represents a hypothetical MBL clone expressing the germline VH3–07 sequence. H1 – H3 represent hypothetical transitional MBL clones that were not observed in the analysis.

When interpreted in the context of other published reports, our single cell IGVH analyses help clarify the biologic continuum of MBL and CLL. Among cases of MBL that progressed to CLL, both Rawstron et al and Landgren et al found that the IGVH sequences were typical for CLL, and approximately 80% were mutated [4, 5]. All of these cases were monoclonal (albeit using bulk sequencing techniques) and the majority of these cases had B cell lymphocytosis at the time of ascertainment. Investigations of predominantly “low count” MBL reveal interesting contrasts with larger MBL clones. Dagklis et al also found a preponderance of mutated IGVH sequences. However, the VH families identified, including VH4-59/61 and VH3-30, are not commonly observed in CLL [24]. Nieto et al, investigating IGVH usage among 7 very small MBL clones wherein the majority of cases had < 1.0 × 106MBL cells / L, found both mutated and unmutated IGVH sequences with predominant usage of VH1 and VH3 family genes [9]. Both Dagklis et al and Nieto et al observed oligoclonal MBL among a minority of low count MBL cases based on the absence of skewing of the κ:λ light chain ratio by flow cytometry. Taken together, the data suggest that small MBL clones are commonly oligoclonal and that they may use a different subset (and perhaps a more diversified subset) of immunoglobulin genes than CLL. Larger MBL clones are more akin to CLL, with IGVH usage similar to IGVH mutated CLL and are almost always monoclonal. Though speculative, these observed differences may reflect the diminished capacity of some BCRs for downstream signaling and, in turn, clinical progression from MBL to CLL. The characterization of BCR downstream signaling pathways in MBL is an area of ongoing effort in the laboratory.

Changes within the B Cell Compartment in MBL

Acquired immune dysfunction is one of the hallmark clinical features of CLL. Most patients with CLL have complete or near replacement of the normal B cell compartment by malignant CD5+ cells. With time, hypogammaglobulinemia develops in a significant proportion of patients. Infections remain a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among CLL patients.

Although most cases of CLL have few if any residual normal B cells at the time of diagnosis, most “low count” MBL have a preserved normal B cell compartment. To investigate the phenomenon of “drop out” of normal B cell subsets, Rawstron analyzed absolute MBL and normal B cell numbers from 1,081 MBL ascertained by MBL screening programs worldwide. The normal B cell count was found to range between 50 and 500 × 106 cells / L. Interestingly, most MBL showed absolute numbers that were either less than or greater than this range of values, suggesting a bimodal distribution of MBL cell numbers [23]. This observation remains unexplained. Further, it was noted that MBL with absolute CLL-phenotype cell counts > 500 × 106/ L correlated with decreasing numbers of normal B cells, and complete loss of the normal B cell compartment was observed at MBL cell counts as low as 1,000 × 106 MBL cells / L. A hypothetical model of MBL progression with depletion of the B cell compartment is presented in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Hypothetical model of MBL progression.

Figure 2

The B cell lymphocyte count is shown on the vertical axis. Since the duration of an MBL phase prior to CLL is quite variable, we use the phrase “biologic progression” on the horizontal axis as a surrogate for time-to-progression. As the MBL clone expands (dotted line), the absolute B cell count (solid line) initially remains normal during the “low count” MBL phase. Once the MBL clone size reaches normal B cell count, the number of residual normal B cells (long dashed line) begins to decline. Once the size of the MBL clone reaches approximately 1,900 × 106/ L, MBL cells comprise most or all of B cell compartment, and the subject is at high risk of progressive lymphocytosis. Once the B cell count exceeds 5,000 × 106/ L, the diagnostic criteria for CLL are met. On the right, the triangle designates that the prevalence of “low count” MBL is far greater than either CLL or MBL with an absolute lymphocytosis.

Although depletion of the normal B cell compartment was clearly correlated with increasing MBL cell numbers, this effect was relatively variable, and the determinants of contraction of the normal B cell compartment with increasing MBL clone size remain under study. To further investigate this phenomenon, Hauswirth et al recently reported preliminary investigation of normal B cell subsets in MBL [23a]. They observed that all B cell subsets, including immature, naïve, memory B-lymphocytes and plasmablasts, were significantly reduced in MBL when compared to controls. A statistically significant decrease in all subsets was noted when MBL cells comprised > 1% of the entire B cell compartment. They concluded that this observation suggests a direct suppressive effect of the MBL clone on normal B cell lymphopoiesis. In preliminary investigations in our laboratory, we have observed inversion of the ratio of naïve to memory B cells among a minority of MBL cases, potentially suggesting impaired production of new naïve B cells as an initial etiology of depletion of normal B cell subsets (Lanasa et al, unpublished).

Changes within the T Cell Compartment in MBL

In addition to B cell and humoral immune abnormalities, CLL patients also have qualitative and quantitative T cell abnormalities. Most malignancies are associated with decreased numbers of circulating T cells. However in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), T cell numbers are elevated 2 to 4 times normal [38, 39]. Rather than promoting an anti-tumor response, this increased population of T cells may contribute to a tumor microenvironment that promotes progression of the malignant clone [40]. Direct contact between CLL cells and T cells causes downregulation of cellular pathways important for T cell cytotoxicity [41, 42]. CLL cells secrete immunomodulatory cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-10 that shift the helper T cell response from a Th1 response to an anergic Th2 response [41, 43, 44]. Suppressive regulatory T cells are also increased in patients with CLL [45, 46]. The T cell repertoire is significantly contracted in CLL, with presence of oligoclonal and monoclonal subsets [4749]. Taken together, this global impairment in T cell function may be an important cause of tumor progression, increased susceptibility to infection, and secondary malignancies in patients with CLL.

As previously stated, it has been proposed that IGVH unmutated CLL arise from B cells that mature through a T cell independent pathway, because CD4+ T cell help is required for somatic mutation and isotype switching in the germinal center reaction [2, 50, 51]. Therefore, IGVH mutated and unmutated CLL may have differing capacities for T cell interaction and immune modulation. A recent report by Palmer et al showed that increased numbers of T and “natural killer” (NK) cells relative to the number of CLL lymphocytes in patients with newly diagnosed CLL is associated with improved prognosis [52]. Further, they showed that increased T and NK cell : CLL lymphocyte ratios correlated with a mutated IGVH. This finding supports the hypothesis that IGVH mutated and unmutated CLL induce different T cell responses and that these T and NK cell responses precede clinical CLL.

To evaluate if similar T cell abnormalities are observed in MBL as in CLL, we enumerated T cells from a series of 20 untreated patients with CLL (10 IGVH mutated and 10 unmutated) and 8 MBL subjects [53]. The CD4+ count was similar in IGVH unmutated CLL, IGVH mutated CLL, and MBL subjects. The CD8+ count was higher in IGVH unmutated compared to IGVH mutated CLL patients (891 vs. 593 × 106 cells / L, n.s.), and was significantly higher in IGVH unmutated than MBL subjects (891 vs. 273 × 106 cells / L, p<0.05). Similarly, the ratio of CD4+: CD8+ T cells was significantly lower in IGVH unmutated CLL compared to IGVH mutated CLL or MBL (1.6 vs. 2.6, p<0.05, and 1.6 vs. 4.5, p<0.01, respectively).

To estimate the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell repertoire diversity, we coupled PCR amplification of the CDR3 length polymorphism of 23 TCRVβ families (“Spectratyping”) with a novel, quantitative method for analysis of TCR repertoires by using SpA [54]. The calculated mean divergence coefficients (a calculated unitless value to quantify the degree of “skewness” from a pseudo-Gaussian distribution) for the T cell Spectratypes were compared between groups. Combined analysis of all CLL patients showed the mean CD8+ TCR Spectratype divergence was 0.32, significantly higher than the mean CD4+ divergence (0.07, 2 sided t-test, p<10−6). Oligoclonal and monoclonal Vβ families were frequently observed among CD8+ cells, but rarely observed among CD4+ cells. Next, we evaluated whether MBL is associated with a restricted TCR repertoire. The mean CD8+ and CD4+ divergence among MBL subjects was similar to that observed in CLL patients (mean CD8+ divergence: 0.35 for MBL vs. 0.32 for all CLL; mean CD4+ divergence: 0.06 for MBL vs. 0.07 for all CLL. We performed a multivariate correlation to identify variables associated with restriction of the CD8+ repertoire in MBL. Patient characteristics, the absolute number of different lymphocyte subsets, and “MBL characteristics” (ZAP70 status, CD38 status, and the “MBL percentage,” defined as the number of MBL cells divided by the total number of CD19+ B cells) were considered. A correlation between the absolute number of CD4+ cells and the diversity of the CD8+ repertoire was observed: higher numbers of CD4 +cells correlated with more diverse CD8+ repertoire (ρ = −0.82, p<0.05). Loss of specific CD4+ subsets may cause contraction of the CD8+ repertoire; alternatively some CLL and MBL may have the capacity to modulate both the CD4+ and CD8+ subsets as independent effects [53].

Summary and Future Directions

In summary, ongoing research of MBL by our group and others is yielding important insights into the pathogenesis of CLL. These investigations reveal MBL and CLL to be part of a continuum in which small MBL clones apparently share greater similarity to the normal B cell compartment (as determined by absolute B cell numbers, IGVH usage, and clonality studies) than to MBL with lymphocytosis, which in turn, is more similar to CLL. The immunologic and cellular mechanisms that allow “low count” MBL to expand beyond the size of the normal B cell compartment may be centrally important in CLL leukemogenesis. Areas of ongoing investigation include: (a) MBL as a marker of inherited risk for CLL and the role of genetics in MBL development; (b) the clinical outcomes of individuals with low count MBL; (c) the biologic characteristics of MBL as a determinant of risk for the development of CLL; and (d) host characteristics that are either permissive for or protective against progression of MBL to CLL. These investigations should help clarify the process of CLL leukemogenesis and may identify novel therapeutic targets in CLL.

Acknowledgments

MC Lanasa is a fellow of the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America. This research was supported by the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society of America, the Bernstein Fund for Leukemia Research, the VA Research Service, and a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NCI R03 CA128030). Flow Cytometry was performed in the Duke Human Vaccine Institute Flow Cytometry Core Facility that is supported by the National Institutes of Health award AI-51445. The Genetic Epidemiology of CLL (GEC) Consortium is supported by NIH grants CA118444 and CA92153; the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Cancer Institute;, and CLL Research Consortium. Additional support was provided by 1 UL1 RR024150 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of NIH and the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, the Veterans Affairs Research Service, and CA15083 from the National Cancer Institute. The GEC member institutions are: The Mayo Clinic (lead site; PI: Susan Slager, Ph.D.), Duke University, The M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, The National Cancer Institute, The University of California at San Diego, The University of Minnesota, and The University of Utah.

References

  • 1.Altekruse SF, KC, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, Ruhl J, Howlader N, Tatalovich Z, Cho H, Mariotto A, Eisner MP, Lewis DR, Cronin K, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Stinchcomb DG, Edwards BK, editors. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2007. National Cancer Institute; Bethesda, MD: 2010. http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2007/, based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chiorazzi N, Rai KR, Ferrarini M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(8):804–15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra041720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rawstron AC, et al. Monoclonal B lymphocytes with the characteristics of “indolent” chronic lymphocytic leukemia are present in 3.5% of adults with normal blood counts. Blood. 2002;100(2):635–9. doi: 10.1182/blood.v100.2.635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rawstron AC, et al. Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(6):575–83. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa075290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Landgren O, et al. B-cell clones as early markers for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(7):659–67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0806122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rawstron AC, et al. Inherited predisposition to CLL is detectable as subclinical monoclonal B-lymphocyte expansion. Blood. 2002;100(7):2289–90. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-03-0892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ghia P, et al. Monoclonal CD5+ and CD5- B-lymphocyte expansions are frequent in the peripheral blood of the elderly. Blood. 2004;103(6):2337–42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-09-3277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shim YK, et al. Prevalence and natural history of monoclonal and polyclonal B-cell lymphocytosis in a residential adult population. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2007;72(5):344–53. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nieto WG, et al. Increased frequency (12%) of circulating chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like B-cell clones in healthy subjects using a highly sensitive multicolor flow cytometry approach. Blood. 2009;114(1):33–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-197368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nieto WG, et al. Commentary: Comparison of current flow cytometry methods for monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis detection. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 78(Suppl 1):S4–9. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shim YK, et al. Prevalence of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis: a systematic review. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 78(Suppl 1):S10–8. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lanasa MC, et al. Single-cell analysis reveals oligoclonality among ‘low-count’ monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Leukemia. 24(1):133–40. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Marti GE, et al. B-cell monoclonal lymphocytosis and B-cell abnormalities in the setting of familial B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2003;52(1):1–12. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.10013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goldin LR, et al. Common occurrence of monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis among members of high-risk CLL families. Br J Haematol. 2010 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08339.x. In press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14a.Matos DM, Ismael SJ, Scrideli CA, de Oliveira FM, Rego EM, Falcao RP. Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis in first-degree relatives of patients with sporadic (non-familial) chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2009;147:339–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Crowther-Swanepoel D, et al. Inherited genetic susceptibility to monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Blood. 2010 doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294975. In press. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Goldin LR, et al. Elevated risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other indolent non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas among relatives of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2009;94(5):647–53. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.003632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shanafelt TD, et al. Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL): biology, natural history and clinical management. Leukemia. 24(3):512–20. doi: 10.1038/leu.2009.287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Marti GE, et al. Diagnostic criteria for monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis. Br J Haematol. 2005;130(3):325–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05550.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheson BD, et al. National Cancer Institute-sponsored Working Group guidelines for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: revised guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. Blood. 1996;87(12):4990–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hallek M, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a report from the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-Working Group 1996 guidelines. Blood. 2008;111(12):5446–56. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-093906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shanafelt TD, et al. B-cell count and survival: differentiating chronic lymphocytic leukemia from monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis based on clinical outcome. Blood. 2009;113(18):4188–96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-176149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shanafelt TD, et al. Brief report: natural history of individuals with clinically recognized monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis compared with patients with Rai 0 chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27 (24):3959–63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.2704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rawstron AC, et al. Different biology and clinical outcome according to the absolute numbers of clonal B-cells in monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 78(Suppl 1):S19–23. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23a.Hauswirth A, et al. Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) with normal whole lymphocyte counts is associated with reduced numbers of normal circulating immature and mature B-lymphocytes. Hematologica. 95(Suppl 2):324. (abstract) [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dagklis A, et al. The immunoglobulin gene repertoire of low-count chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-like monoclonal B lymphocytosis is different from CLL: diagnostic implications for clinical monitoring. Blood. 2009;114(1):26–32. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-09-176933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Caligaris-Cappio F, Ghia P. Novel insights in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: are we getting closer to understanding the pathogenesis of the disease? J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(27):4497–503. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fais F, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells express restricted sets of mutated and unmutated antigen receptors. J Clin Invest. 1998;102(8):1515–25. doi: 10.1172/JCI3009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Widhopf GF, 2nd, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells of more than 1% of patients express virtually identical immunoglobulins. Blood. 2004;104(8):2499–504. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-0818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tobin G, et al. Subsets with restricted immunoglobulin gene rearrangement features indicate a role for antigen selection in the development of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2004;104(9):2879–85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-01-0132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Messmer BT, et al. Multiple distinct sets of stereotyped antigen receptors indicate a role for antigen in promoting chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Exp Med. 2004;200(4):519–25. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hamblin TJ, et al. Unmutated Ig V(H) genes are associated with a more aggressive form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999;94(6):1848–54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Rosenwald A, et al. Relation of gene expression phenotype to immunoglobulin mutation genotype in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Exp Med. 2001;194(11):1639–47. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.11.1639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Klein U, et al. Gene expression profiling of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia reveals a homogeneous phenotype related to memory B cells. J Exp Med. 2001;194(11):1625–38. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.11.1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guarini A, et al. BCR ligation induced by IgM stimulation results in gene expression and functional changes only in IgV H unmutated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells. Blood. 2008;112(3):782–92. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-12-127688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Volkheimer AD, et al. Progressive immunoglobulin gene mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: evidence for antigen-driven intraclonal diversification. Blood. 2007;109(4):1559–67. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-020644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lossos IS, et al. The inference of antigen selection on Ig genes. J Immunol. 2000;165(9):5122–6. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.9.5122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bagnara D, et al. IgV gene intraclonal diversification and clonal evolution in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2006;133(1):50–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05974.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Gurrieri C, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells can undergo somatic hypermutation and intraclonal immunoglobulin V(H)DJ(H) gene diversification. J Exp Med. 2002;196(5):629–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Markey GM, et al. Enumeration of absolute numbers of T lymphocyte subsets in B-chronic lymphocytic leukaemia using an immunoperoxidase technique: relation to clinical stage. Br J Haematol. 1986;62(2):257–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1986.tb02929.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kimby E, et al. T lymphocyte subpopulations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia of B cell type in relation to immunoglobulin isotype(s) on the leukemic clone and to clinical features. Eur J Haematol. 1987;38(3):261–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1987.tb01174.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ghia P, Caligaris-Cappio F. The indispensable role of microenvironment in the natural history of low-grade B-cell neoplasms. Adv Cancer Res. 2000;79:157–73. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(00)79005-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gorgun G, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells induce changes in gene expression of CD4 and CD8 T cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1797–805. doi: 10.1172/JCI24176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ramsay AG, et al. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia T cells show impaired immunological synapse formation that can be reversed with an immunomodulating drug. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(7):2427–37. doi: 10.1172/JCI35017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lotz M, Ranheim E, Kipps TJ. Transforming growth factor beta as endogenous growth inhibitor of chronic lymphocytic leukemia B cells. J Exp Med. 1994;179(3):999–1004. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.3.999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fayad L, et al. Interleukin-6 and interleukin-10 levels in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: correlation with phenotypic characteristics and outcome. Blood. 2001;97(1):256–63. doi: 10.1182/blood.v97.1.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Beyer M, et al. Reduced frequencies and suppressive function of CD4+CD25hi regulatory T cells in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia after therapy with fludarabine. Blood. 2005;106(6):2018–25. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Motta M, et al. Increased expression of CD152 (CTLA-4) by normal T lymphocytes in untreated patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia. 2005;19(10):1788–93. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2403907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rezvany MR, et al. Oligoclonal TCRBV gene usage in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: major perturbations are preferentially seen within the CD4 T-cell subset. Blood. 1999;94(3):1063–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Goolsby CL, et al. Expansions of clonal and oligoclonal T cells in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia are primarily restricted to the CD3(+)CD8(+) T-cell population. Cytometry. 2000;42(3):188–95. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Serrano D, et al. Clonal expansion within the CD4+CD57+ and CD8+CD57+ T cell subsets in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Immunol. 1997;158(3):1482–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Miller C, et al. Facultative role of germinal centers and T cells in the somatic diversification of IgVH genes. J Exp Med. 1995;181(4):1319–31. doi: 10.1084/jem.181.4.1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fischer M, Klein U, Kuppers R. Molecular single-cell analysis reveals that CD5-positive peripheral blood B cells in healthy humans are characterized by rearranged Vkappa genes lacking somatic mutation. J Clin Invest. 1997;100(7):1667–76. doi: 10.1172/JCI119691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Palmer S, et al. Prognostic importance of T and NK-cells in a consecutive series of newly diagnosed patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 2008;141(5):607–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07070.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Lanasa MC, et al. Oligoclonal TRBV gene usage among CD8(+) T cells in monoclonal B lymphocytosis and CLL. Br J Haematol. 2009;145(4):535–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07635.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kepler TB, et al. Statistical analysis of antigen receptor spectratype data. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(16):3394–400. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES