Skip to main content
Microbes and Environments logoLink to Microbes and Environments
. 2014 May 31;29(2):184–190. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME14011

Effects of Elevated Carbon Dioxide, Elevated Temperature, and Rice Growth Stage on the Community Structure of Rice Root–Associated Bacteria

Takashi Okubo 1,†,*, Takeshi Tokida 2, Seishi Ikeda 3, Zhihua Bao 1, Kanako Tago 2, Masahito Hayatsu 2, Hirofumi Nakamura 4, Hidemitsu Sakai 2, Yasuhiro Usui 2, Kentaro Hayashi 2, Toshihiro Hasegawa 2, Kiwamu Minamisawa 1
PMCID: PMC4103525  PMID: 24882221

Abstract

The effects of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) and elevated soil and water temperature (warming) on the rice root–associated bacterial community were evaluated by clone library analysis of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene. Roots were sampled at the panicle initiation and ripening stages 41 and 92 days after transplanting (DAT), respectively. The relative abundances of the methanotrophs Methylosinus and Methylocystis were increased by warming and decreased by FACE at 92 DAT, which indicated that microbial methane (CH4) oxidation in rice roots may have been influenced by global warming. The relative abundance of Burkholderia kururiensis was increased by warming at 41 DAT and by FACE or warming at 92 DAT. The abundances of methanotrophs increased during rice growth, which was likely induced by an enhancement in the emission of CH4 from the paddy fields, suggesting that CH4 is one of the predominant factors affecting the structure of the microbial community in rice roots. Marked variations in the community structure were also observed during rice growth in other genera: Bradyrhizobium, Clostridium, and an unknown genus close to Epsilonproteobacteria were abundant at 92 DAT, whereas Achromobacter was abundant at 41 DAT. These results demonstrated that the community structures of rice root-associated bacteria were markedly affected by FACE, temperature, and the rice growth stage.

Keywords: carbon dioxide, methane, plant-associated bacteria, rice, warming


The atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) was stable at 270 ppm for at least 1,000 years prior to the start of the industrial revolution. Since that time, [CO2] has been rising and has reached nearly 400 ppm (7). The increase in [CO2] is expected to enhance the growth and yield of C3 crops, including rice (29). Previous studies reported that increases in [CO2] quantitatively and qualitatively altered the release of labile sugars, organic acids, and amino acids from plant roots (2, 6), which may influence the activity of rhizospheric and root–associated microbes, including methanogenesis (18). Tokida et al. (32, 33) reported that the emission of CH4 from paddy fields was significantly increased by [CO2] and/or temperature elevations. CH4 generated in soil is diffused into rice roots, transported to the shoot via aerenchyma, and finally released from micropores in the leaf sheaths (25). The rhizosphere and rice roots were previously shown to be the main areas CH4 oxidation in rice paddies (4) because the oxidation of CH4 was inactive in flooded soils without oxygen derived from rice roots.

Although the responses of rice plants to elevated atmospheric [CO2] and/or temperature have been studied in detail, those of plant-associated microbes remain unknown (29, 33). The responses of plant-associated microbes to global climate changes may potentially be important because they play major roles in the flow of carbon and nitrogen as the primary utilizers of plant-derived compounds in the rhizosphere.

A technique to enrich bacterial cells obtained from plant tissues has provided a gateway to access plant-associated bacterial communities (14), and this has facilitated a deeper understanding of microbial community shifts caused by environmental factors (15, 27). In the present study, we investigated the community structure of rice root–associated bacteria in environments with elevated temperature (ET) and/or [CO2] using the bacterial cell enrichment method (14). Our results have provided an insight into carbon and nitrogen cycles in rice paddies under a changing climate.

Materials and Methods

Study site, [CO2] enrichment, and soil and water warming

The free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) and soil warming experiments were conducted in a rice paddy field at Tsukubamirai, Ibaraki, Japan (35°58′27″N, 139°59′32″E, 10 m above sea level), during the 2011 growing season. The soil there is a Fluvisol, which is typical of alluvial areas. The bulk density was 0.87 Mg m−3, and total C and N were 21.4 mg g−1 and 1.97 mg g−1, respectively. The cation exchange capacity was 202 μmolc g−1 (12). The experimental site was established in 2010, and control protocols for the FACE and warming treatments were described previously (23, 32). Briefly, four rice paddy fields were used as replicates, each with areas at ambient [CO2] (AMBI) and also at enriched [CO2] (FACE) with a target concentration of 200 μmol mol−1 above AMBI. Each treatment area was a 240-m2 octagon (“ring,” hereafter). The FACE rings used emission tubes on all eight sides at a height of approximately 30 cm above the canopy, and these released pure CO2 from wind-ward sides to maintain a stable concentration at the center of the rings (ambient + 200 μmol mol−1). The AMBI and FACE rings were separated by at least 70 m (center to center), which was previously shown to be sufficient to prevent cross-contamination by CO2 from a FACE ring (13).

Warming treatments were also conducted by a split-plot design in each ring with two levels of soil and water temperatures: normal temperature (NT) and ET with the target of 2°C above NT. Warming was achieved using heating wires placed on the soil surface between the rows, with the water temperature continuously measured by a Pt100 thermometer (Chino Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The water and plow layer (at a depth of 10 cm) temperatures were almost uniformly elevated. The ET plot was enclosed using corrugated PVC panels to prevent an exchange of the paddy water with the surrounding area.

Rice cultivation and fertilization

Rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Koshihikari) was sown on 25 April 2011 in seedling trays with 448 cells (Minoru Pot 448, Minoru Industrial Co., Ltd., Okayama, Japan). Three pre-germinated seeds were planted in each cell of the tray. After emergence, we raised seedlings in a puddled open field with a tunnel cloche or floating mulch for the first 2 weeks. On 25 and 26 May, seedlings at the five-leaf stage were transplanted into the rings by hand, with three seedlings per hill. Hills and rows were 15 and 30 cm apart, respectively, with a resultant density of 22.2 hills m−2. Fertilizers were applied as a basal dressing. Nitrogen was supplied at 8 g N m−2 (2 and 6 g N m−2 as urea and coated urea, respectively; 4 g of LP-100 and 2 g of LP-140; JCAM-Agri Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Phosphate and potassium were applied as a compound fertilizer (Sumitomo Chemical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) containing 4.4 g P m−2 and 8.3 g K m−2, respectively. The method for rice cultivation and fertilization was described previously (12).

CH4 emission measurements

The emission of CH4 was measured weekly or biweekly between 7 June and 23 August using a closed chamber method, as described previously (16). Each chamber consisting of lower (60 cm H) and upper (60 cm H) sections was placed over 4 hills of rice plants with a basal area of 30 × 60 cm. The upper section of the chamber fit over the lower one and was supported by a water-filled groove surrounding the outer top lip of the lower section, thereby providing an airtight seal between the two sections and surrounding atmosphere. Gas samples were collected from the chamber 0, 10, and 20 min after placement of the chamber. The samples were injected into pre-evacuated 19-mL glass vials and brought back to the laboratory for analysis. The mixing ratio of CH4 was determined by gas chromatography equipped with a flame ionization detector (GC-14B; Shimazu, Kyoto, Japan). The emission of CH4 was calculated based on an increase in the mixing ratio of the basal area of the chamber, chamber volume, and temperature inside the chamber. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on the cumulative amount of CH4 that was emitted during 41–90 days after transplanting (DAT) using a general linear procedure. [CO2], temperature, and [CO2]×temperature were treated as fixed effects, while ring and ring×[CO2] were treated as random effects.

Rice sampling

Three whole rice plants were carefully dug out by hand from each treatment plot on 5 July 2011 (41 d after transplanting [DAT]), which corresponded to the panicle initiation stage, and 25 August (92 DAT), which corresponded to the ripening stage (2 CO2 treatments [AMBI or FACE] × 2 temperature treatments [ET or NT] × 4 rings × 2 growth stages). A block of plow-layer soil, 30 × 15 × 30 cm (length × width × depth), was also taken with the plants. Whole rice plants were then immediately transported to the laboratory and washed with tap water to remove adhering soil particles. The roots were separated from the shoot and stored at −80°C until they were used for analysis.

DNA preparation and clone library construction

The root samples were manually ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Three ground root samples, collected from the same ring of the same treatment, were composited and then homogenized again in a blender. The composited samples were subjected to DNA extraction by the bacterial cell enrichment method (14), PCR amplification, and clone library analysis targeting the 16S rRNA gene (14). Briefly, bacterial DNA was extracted from the composited roots using the bacterial cell enrichment method (14). The PCR clone libraries for 16S rRNA genes were constructed as follows: 10 ng total bacterial DNA was used as a template in a final reaction volume of 50 μL, including 0.1 μM of each primer and 2 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) with the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGAT CMTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1525R (5′-AAGGAGGTGWTCCARCC-3′) (17). The cycling conditions were an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 94°C; 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 1.5 min at 72°C; and a final extension step of 8 min at 72°C. PCR products of the predicted size (1500 bp) were purified using a Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Japan, Tokyo, Japan). Four composited samples, collected from four rings within the same treatment, were combined, then ligated into the pGEM-T Easy plasmid vector (Promega Japan) at 25°C for 1 h. A partial sequence of the 16S rRNA gene was determined by Takara Bio Inc. (Otsu, Japan) using the 27F forward primer as a sequencing primer.

Bioinformatics analysis

Low-quality and contaminated reads were removed using OrientationChecker (1). A partial 16S rRNA gene sequence (corresponding to bases 109 to 684 of the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA gene) was used for sequence analyses. Chimeric sequences were detected using MALLARD (1). The remaining sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL W (31). Based on the alignment, a distance matrix was constructed using the DNADIST program from PHYLIP ver. 3.66 (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html) with the default parameters. The resulting matrix was clustered using Mothur (28) to generate diversity indexes with a threshold of a 97% sequence identity. Library coverage was calculated with the nonparametric estimator C (9). UniFrac (19) was applied with the abundance-weighted option to examine similarities among clone libraries.

The phylogenetic composition of the library sequences was evaluated using the RDPmultiple classifier (34), with confidence levels of 80%. Sequences assigned to Burkholderia and Bradyrhizobium were extracted separately and aligned with reference sequences using CLUSTAL W (31). Neighbor-joining trees were constructed using MEGA version 5.1 (30), and 1,000 bootstrap replicates were used to generate a consensus tree.

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers

The nucleotide sequences of 16S rRNA genes in the clone libraries have been deposited in DDBJ under the accession numbers shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

DDBJ accession numbers of 16S rRNA gene sequences

Sample Panicle initiation stage (41 DAT) Ripening stage (92 DAT)
AMBI-NT AB836880–AB837055 AB837585–AB837749
AMBI-ET AB837056–AB837234 AB837750–AB837919
FACE-NT AB837235–AB837406 AB837920–AB838080
FACE-ET AB837407–AB837584 AB838081–AB838242

DAT, days after transplanting; AMBI, ambient CO2; FACE, free-air CO2 enrichment; NT, normal soil and water temperature; ET, elevated soil and water temperature.

Results and Discussion

Overview of bacterial community structures

The statistics of the clone libraries are summarized in Table 2. In all treatments, the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and the Chao1 and Shannon diversity indexes were greater at 92 DAT than at 41 DAT. These indexes were decreased in the samples at 92 DAT due to the elevation in [CO2] or soil and water temperature. No clear trend was observed in the samples at 41 DAT.

Table 2.

Statistical characteristics of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries derived from rice roots

Rice growth stage Panicle initiation stage (41 DAT) Ripening stage (92 DAT)


CO2 AMBI FACE AMBI FACE




Temperature NT ET NT ET NT ET NT ET
Statistics
No. of sequences 176 179 172 178 165 170 161 162
No. of OTUs (≥97% identity) 28 22 27 28 52 45 48 32
No. of singletons 20 15 19 20 35 28 30 17
Library coverage (%)a 88.6 91.6 89.0 88.8 78.8 83.5 81.4 89.5
Diversity indexes
Chao1 91.3 57.0 69.8 75.5 118.1 82.8 96.3 66.0
Shannon 2.2 1.5 2.1 1.9 3.3 3.0 3.1 2.7

DAT, days after transplanting; AMBI, ambient CO2; FACE, free-air CO2 enrichment; NT, normal soil and water temperature; ET, elevated soil and water temperature; OTU, operational taxonomic unit.

a

Coverage calculated as Cx = 1 – (nx/N), where nx is the number of singletons that are encountered only once in a library and N is the total number of clones.

Principal coordinate analysis was performed using all sequence data (Fig. 1) in order to obtain an overview of bacterial community shifts caused by the rice growth stage and elevation in [CO2] and temperature. Samples were clearly separated along the first principal component (PC1) axis (64.86%) according to the rice growth stage, which indicated that bacterial community structures markedly changed as the host plant grew. Two tight clusters were formed according to the temperature condition in samples at 41 DAT, suggesting that community structures were more sensitive to the temperature change than to that of [CO2] at 41 DAT. Community shifts in samples at 92 DAT were more complicated. The degree of the community shift from the control (AMBI-NT) was smaller in the simultaneous treatment (FACE-ET) than in the other treatments (FACE-NT and AMBI-ET). Furthermore, FACE-NT and AMBI-ET were clustered close to each other at 92 DAT.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Principal coordinate analysis of the 16S rRNA gene libraries of bacterial communities in rice roots under normal and elevated [CO2] and temperature conditions. The ordination was constructed using UniFrac distances weighted by the relative abundances. Principal component 1 (PC1) and principal component 2 (PC2) are plotted on the x- and y-axes, respectively. The percentage of variation explained by the plotted principal coordinates is indicated on the axes. Samples were collected at the panicle initiation stage (●, 41 DAT) and ripening stage (■, 92 DAT).

Phylogenetic composition

In all treatments, the abundances of Methylosinus and Methylocystis were markedly higher at 92 DAT (5.0–15.3%) than at 41 DAT (0.0–1.1%) (Table 3). At the beginning of the rice growing period, the amount of CH4 emitted was very low (Table 4). As the season progressed, it steadily increased to approximately 14–18 mg C-CH4 m−2 h−1 at 48 DAT (July 12), and a high emission level of CH4 was maintained until 83 DAT (August 16). These results suggest that rice roots were exposed to a large amount of CH4 between the first (41 DAT) and second sampling (92 DAT), and this may have caused the increase observed in the relative abundances of Methylosinus and Methylocystis in the rice roots at 92 DAT. The cumulative emission of CH4 during 41–90 DAT was the highest in FACE-ET (Table 4). However, the relative abundances of Methylosinus and Methylocystis in FACE-ET were intermediate among the four treatments (Table 3), which suggested that factors other than CH4 also affected the relative abundances of methanotrophs. At 92 DAT, the relative abundances of Methylosinus and Methylocystis were increased by the elevation in temperature in both AMBI and FACE plots, but were decreased by that in [CO2]. A previous FACE experiment conducted in Japan showed that nitrogen concentrations in rice plants were decreased by elevations in [CO2] (29), which was at least partially attributed to a dilution effect due to the greater production of dry matter. Many studies have suggested the stimulatory effect of nitrogen on CH4 oxidation in rice paddies (3). Such a change in the nitrogen condition may affect the activities of rice root–associated methanotrophs, leading to decreases in the relative abundance by elevations in [CO2]. Tokida et al. (32) previously reported that the emission of CH4 from paddy fields was significantly increased by elevations in [CO2], and this effect was considered to be mainly derived from an increase in rhizodeposition. However, our results suggest that one reason for the increase in CH4 emission with elevations in [CO2] may have been a decline in the abundance of methanotrophs associated with rice roots. An enhancement in CH4 oxidation activity in rice roots is vital for breaking the positive feedback loop of CH4 emission that will occur with increases in atmospheric [CO2] in the future. However, we did not observe a clear increase in the emission of CH4 by elevations in [CO2] under the NT condition (Table 4). Therefore, the effects of [CO2] and temperature elevation on the oxidation activity of CH4 in paddy fields need to be studied in more detail.

Table 3.

Phylogenetic compositions of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries derived from rice roots (values are relative abundances as a percentage of total bacteria)

Rice growth stage Panicle initiation stage (41 DAT) Ripening stage (92 DAT)


CO2 AMBI FACE AMBI FACE




Temperature NT ET NT ET NT ET NT ET
Proteobacteria
Alphaproteobacteria 10.8 3.4 5.2 5.6 17.6 26.5 15.5 12.3
  Methylosinus (A) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.1 11.2 2.5 4.3
  Methylocystis (B) 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.1 3.0 4.1 2.5 2.5
   (A)+(B) 0.0 0.6 0.0 1.1 9.1 15.3 5.0 6.8
  Bradyrhizobium 0.0 0.6 1.2 1.1 5.5 4.1 5.6 4.9
  Rhizobium 10.2 2.2 4.1 1.7 1.8 4.7 1.9 0.0
Betaproteobacteria 77.8 87.2 77.9 84.3 10.9 42.4 47.8 35.8
  Burkholderia 44.9 72.1 34.9 64.0 8.5 37.6 42.9 35.2
  Ralstonia 27.8 13.4 39.5 15.7 2.4 3.5 4.3 0.6
  Achromobacter 4.0 1.7 2.3 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Gammaproteobacteria 2.3 1.1 3.5 2.8 5.5 2.4 2.5 6.2
  Aquicella 0.6 0.6 1.2 1.7 5.5 1.8 2.5 5.6
Deltaproteobacteria 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0
Firmicutes
Bacilli 1.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Clostridia 1.7 0.0 1.2 1.1 9.7 5.9 11.2 13.6
  Clostridium III 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.3 3.5 3.1 9.9
  Clostridium sensu stricto 0.0 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.0 0.0 3.1 1.2
Others 1.1 2.2 0.6 0.6 1.8 1.8 2.5 0.6
Unclassified 5.1 6.1 11.0 5.1 53.3 20.6 20.5 31.5
  Unclassified OTU164 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.9 1.2 2.5 18.5

DAT, days after transplanting; AMBI, ambient CO2; FACE, free-air CO2 enrichment; NT, normal soil and water temperature; ET, elevated soil and water temperature.

Table 4.

Seasonal and total CH4 emission from each rice paddy treatment

AMBI-NT FACE-NT AMBI-ET FACE-ET
13 DAT (7 June) 0.64 ± 0.16 0.81 ± 0.16 0.64 ± 0.19 0.51 ± 0.42
27 DAT (21 June) 1.88 ± 0.81 2.68 ± 0.69 2.85 ± 1.68 3.47 ± 1.87
41 DAT (5 July) 7.85 ± 1.62 10.87 ± 2.98 9.96 ± 2.82 11.98 ± 2.67
48 DAT (12 July) 14.00 ± 2.23 15.89 ± 3.38 17.26 ± 2.78 18.35 ± 3.14
62 DAT (26 July) 14.71 ± 3.97 14.39 ± 3.61 18.06 ± 4.08 18.69 ± 2.40
69 DAT (2 August) 15.01 ± 7.80 16.25 ± 4.15 15.42 ± 3.77 18.37 ± 5.09
76 DAT (9 August) 30.36 ± 8.50 22.36 ± 6.44 27.50 ± 7.63 27.16 ± 6.63
83 DAT (16 August) 22.98 ± 4.55 19.96 ± 5.44 26.72 ± 9.12 31.83 ± 8.68
90 DAT (23 August) 11.71 ± 5.70 14.96 ± 10.29 13.30 ± 4.62 14.33 ± 9.67
Total emission (41–90 DAT) 20.36 ± 5.04 19.64 ± 4.69 22.22 ± 2.99 24.13 ± 3.33

ANOVA results
 [CO2] not significant (P=0.67)
 Temperature P=0.05
 [CO2]×Temperature not significant (P=0.34)

Data are the mean ± SD of four replicated plots (except n = 3 for AMBI-ET at 62 DAT and FACE-ET at 83 DAT).

Seasonal CH4 emissions are shown in mg C-CH4 m−2 h−1 and total CH4 emission in g C-CH4 m−2.

Total emission shows the cumulative emission of CH4 during 41–90 DAT, which almost corresponded to the two microbial sampling dates.

DAT, days after transplanting; AMBI, ambient CO2; FACE, free-air CO2 enrichment; NT, normal soil and water temperature; ET, elevated soil and water temperature.

Members of the genus Bradyrhizobium are important nitrogen-fixing bacteria in rice roots (5). In all treatments, the relative abundance of Bradyrhizobium was greater at 92 DAT (4.1–5.6%) than at 41 DAT (0.0–1.2%) (Table 3). However, no apparent effects of the elevation in [CO2] and temperature were observed at 41 or 92 DAT. To perform a detailed phylogenetic analysis of rice root–associated Bradyrhizobium, 16S rRNA reads assigned to Bradyrhizobium were extracted from clone libraries and a phylogenetic tree was constructed with the other members of bradirhizobia (Fig. 2A). Rice root–associated bradyrhizobia were clustered into two groups that were phylogenetically close to Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS278 (bradyrhizobial cluster I) (8, 26) and Bradyrhizobium jicamae (bradyrhizobial cluster II). Bradyrhizobial cluster I was only observed at 92 DAT (Fig. 2B), whereas bradyrhizobial cluster II was observed at both 41 and 92 DAT (Fig. 2C). In a previous study, Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS278 was reported to colonize the surface and intercellular space of rice roots and also fix nitrogen (5). Our clone library analysis suggested that members of bradyrhizobial cluster I may be representative nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the rice root at the ripening stage. The relative abundance of bradyrhizobial cluster I (Fig. 2B) was strongly correlated with those of Methylosinus and Methylocystis (Pearson’s correlation coefficient, r=0.83, P=0.011; r=0.92, P=0.001, respectively). One explanation for this correlation was the possible metabolic coupling by which one-carbon compounds oxidized by methanotrophs such as methanol may be partially consumed by these Bradyrhizobium species. Bradyrhizobium sp. ORS278 (bradyrhizobial cluster I) has a gene for methanol oxidation (BRADO5483–BRADO5487) on the genome, and was able to oxidize methanol (Seki et al. unpublished result).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic position and distribution of rice root–associated Bradyrhizobium. (A) Phylogenetic tree of rice root–associated bradyrhizobia extracted from the clone libraries. (B, C) Distributions of reads belonging to the two large groups in panel (A). Accession numbers are shown following the strain names.

Burkholderia was the most dominant genus in all samples, except AMBI-NT at 92 DAT, (Table 3). Members of this genus differ in terms of their effects on rice plants by exhibiting pathogenic (e.g., Burkholderia glumae) (11) or symbiotic (e.g., Burkholderia kururiensis) interactions (21). A phylogenetic tree was constructed using 16S rRNA reads assigned to rice root–associated Burkholderia in the clone libraries (Fig. 3A). Most of the sequences clustered into one group that was phylogenetically close to B. kururiensis (Figs. 3A, B). This species was reported to colonize rice roots and significantly enhance rice growth by fixing nitrogen and producing the phytohormone auxin (21). Previous rice FACE experiments showed that the nitrogen concentration of rice was decreased by elevations in [CO2] (29), which suggested that nitrogen availability is a limiting factor in an elevated [CO2] environment. In the present study, the relative abundance of Burkholderia was still high at 92 DAT in under the elevated [CO2] condition (Table 3). These results suggest that when a nitrogen deficiency occurs in rice, the high relative abundance of Burkholderia is maintained for a longer period in order to support growth. The high relative abundance of Burkholderia was also maintained at 92 DAT in the ET condition (Table 3). Root–associated Burkholderia may also play roles to support the growth of rice stimulated by elevations in temperature (33).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Phylogenetic position and distribution of rice root–associated Burkholderia. (A) Phylogenetic tree of rice root–associated Burkholderia extracted from the clone libraries. (B, C) Distributions of reads belonging to the two large groups in panel (A). Accession numbers are shown following the strain names.

A high relative abundance of Clostridia was observed in all treatments at 92 DAT (5.9–13.6%) (Table 3), suggesting the presence of an anaerobic environment in rice roots at the ripening stage. At 92 DAT, Clostridium cluster III was the most abundant genus in Clostridia, the members of which produce cellulosomes (highly active cellulolytic and xylanolytic complexes) (24). Plant biomass decomposed by Clostridium cluster III and other microbes may be a substrate for rice root–associated methanogenic archaea (15, 18).

One large OTU (OTU164), which was an unclassified bacterium showing 89% similarity to Nitratiruptor tergarcus, was abundant in AMBI-NT (33.9%) and FACE-ET (18.5%) at 92 DAT (Table 3). Nitratiruptor tergarcus is an Epsilonproteobacteria and a nitrate-reducing chemolithoautotroph (22). This OTU member is one of the main reasons why AMBI-NT and FACE-ET at 92 DAT were clustered with each other in the principal coordinate analysis (Fig. 1). The relative abundance of OTU164 was markedly decreased by the elevation in temperature (1.2% vs. 33.9% in AMBI-NT) or [CO2] (2.5%), but was only slightly decreased by the simultaneous elevation in temperature and [CO2] (18.5%) (Table 3). These results suggested that the effects of temperature and [CO2] elevations interact with each other and changes in the community structure are compensated.

Achromobacter, a genus of sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in rice paddy fields (10), was only observed at 41 DAT (Table 3). Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria are able to oxidize reduced sulfur compounds (H2S, thiosulfate, and sulfite). Sulfate is the main sulfur compound that rice roots can take up (20). Achromobacter may play an important role in the growth of rice at the panicle initiation stage.

Conclusion

[CO2] enrichment (FACE), elevated soil & water temperature (warming), and rice growth stages markedly affected the microbial communities of rice root-associated bacteria including Methylosinus sp., Methylocystis sp., Burkholderia kururiensis, Bradyrhizobium sp., Clostridium sp., and an unknown genus (OTU164) close to Epsilonproteobacteria. Most of these bacteria play important roles in the metabolism of C and N in the environment through, for example, nitrogen fixation and methane oxidation. The results of the present study will contribute to improving our understanding of microbe-mediated CN dynamics in paddy rice fields under a changing climate.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [grant number H2247071, H3247071, and H260430] to TO; the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (Genomics for Agricultural Innovation PMI-0002, and BRAIN); and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 23248052 to KM).

References

  • 1.Ashelford KE, Chuzhanova NA, Fry JC, Jones AJ, Weightman AJ. New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5734–5741. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00556-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bhattacharyya P, Roy KS, Neogi S, Manna MC, Adhya TK, Rao KS, Nayak AK. Influence of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on belowground carbon allocation and enzyme activities in tropical flooded soil planted with rice. Environ Monit Assess. 2013;185:8659–8671. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3202-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bodelier PL, Laanbroek HJ. Nitrogen as a regulatory factor of methane oxidation in soils and sediments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2004;47:265–277. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00304-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bosse U, Frenzel P. Activity and distribution of methane-oxidizing bacteria in flooded rice soil microcosms and in rice plants (Oryza sativa) Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997;63:1199–1207. doi: 10.1128/aem.63.4.1199-1207.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chaintreuil C, Giraud E, Prin Y, Lorquin J, Bâ A, Gillis M, de Lajudie P, Dreyfus B. Photosynthetic bradyrhizobia are natural endophytes of the African wild rice Oryza breviligulata. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:5437–5447. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.12.5437-5447.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Drigo B, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA. Climate change goes underground: effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on microbial community structure and activities in the rhizosphere. Biol. Fertil Soils. 2008;44:667–679. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, et al. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, editors. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2007. pp. 129–234. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Giraud E, Moulin L, Vallenet D, et al. Legumes symbioses: absence of Nod genes in photosynthetic bradyrhizobia. Science. 2007;316:1307–1312. doi: 10.1126/science.1139548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Good IJ. The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika. 1953;40:237–264. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Graff A, Stubner S. Isolation and molecular characterization of thiosulfate-oxidizing bacteria from an Italian rice field soil. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2003;26:445–452. doi: 10.1078/072320203322497482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ham JH, Melanson RA, Rush MC. Burkholderia glumae: Next major pathogen of rice? Mol Plant Pathol. 2011;12:329–339. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00676.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hasegawa T, Sakai H, Tokida T, et al. Rice cultivar responses to elevated CO2at two free-air CO2enrichment (FACE) sites in Japan. Funct Plant Biol. 2013;40:148–159. doi: 10.1071/FP12357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heim A, Moser N, Blum H, Schmidt MWI. How far do experimentally elevated CO2levels reach into the surrounding? An example using the 13C label of soil organic matter as an archive. Global Change Biol. 2009;15:1598–1602. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ikeda S, Kaneko T, Okubo T, et al. Development of a bacterial cell enrichment method and its application to the community analysis in soybean stems. Microbial Ecol. 2009;58:703–714. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9566-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ikeda S, Sasaki K, Okubo T, et al. Low nitrogen fertilization adapts rice root microbiome to low nutrient environment by changing biogeochemical functions. Microbes Environ. 2014;29:50–59. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME13110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Inubushi K, Cheng W, Aonuma S, Hoque MM, Kobayashi K, Miura S, Kim HY, Okada M. Effect of free-air CO2enrichment (FACE) on CH4emission from a rice paddy field. Global Change Biol. 2003;9:1458–1464. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M, editors. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics. Wiley; Chichester, UK: 1991. pp. 115–175. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu GC, Tokida T, Matsunami T, Nakamura H, Okada M, Sameshima R, Hasegawa T, Sugiyama S. Microbial community composition controls the effects of climate change on methane emission from rice paddies. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012;4:648–654. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2012.00391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:8228–8835. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8228-8235.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lunde C, Zygadlo A, Simonsen HT, Nielsen PL, Blennow A, Haldrup A. Sulfur starvation in rice: the effect on photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and oxidative stress protective pathways. Physiol Plant. 2008;134:508–521. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2008.01159.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mattos KA, Pádua VL, Romeiro A, et al. Endophytic colonization of rice (Oryza sativa L.) by the diazotrophic bacterium Burkholderia kururiensis and its ability to enhance plant growth. Ann Acad Bras Cienc. 2008;80:477–493. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652008000300009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nakagawa S, Takai K, Inagaki F, Horikoshi K, Sako Y. Nitratiruptor tergarcus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Nitratifractor salsuginis gen. nov., sp. nov., nitrate-reducing chemolithoautotrophs of the epsilon-Proteobacteria isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal system in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2005;55:925–933. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63480-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nakamura H, Tokida T, Yoshimoto M, Sakai H, Fukuoka M, Hasegawa T. Performance of the enlarged rice-FACE system using pure CO2installed in Tsukuba, Japan. J Agric Meteorol. 2012;68:15–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nishiyama T, Ueki A, Kaku N, Ueki K. Clostridium sufflavum sp. nov., isolated from a methanogenic reactor treating cattle waste. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2009;59:981–986. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.001719-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Nouchi I, Mariko S, Aoki K. Mechanism of methane transport from the rhizosphere to the atmosphere through rice plants. Plant Physiol. 1990;94:59–66. doi: 10.1104/pp.94.1.59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Okubo T, Fukushima S, Itakura M, et al. Genome analysis suggests that the soil oligotrophic bacterium Agromonas oligotrophica (Bradyrhizobium oligotrophicum) is a nitrogen-fixing symbiont of Aeschynomene indica. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2542–2551. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00009-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sasaki K, Ikeda S, Ohkubo T, Kisara C, Sato T, Minamisawa K. Effects of plant genotype and nitrogen level on bacterial communities in rice shoots and roots. Microbes Environ. 2013;28:391–395. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME12212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, et al. Introducing Mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–7541. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shimono H, Okada M, Yamakawa Y, Nakamura H, Kobayashi K, Hasegawa T. Genotypic variation in rice yield enhancement by elevated CO2relates to growth before heading and not to maturity group. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:523–532. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994;22:4673–4680. doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tokida T, Fumoto T, Cheng W, et al. Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) and soil warming on CH4 emission from a rice paddy field: impact assessment and stoichiometric evaluation. Biogeosciences. 2010;7:2639–2653. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tokida T, Adachi M, Cheng W, et al. Methane and soil CO2production from current-season photosynthates in a rice paddy exposed to elevated CO2concentration and soil temperature. Global Change Biol. 2011;17:3327–3337. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbes and Environments are provided here courtesy of Nakanishi Printing

RESOURCES