Abstract
Many Lactobacillus and Lactococcus strains are generally regarded as safe for consumption because they are utilized for food fermentation or inhabit the intestinal mucosa as commensals. Recently, vaccine delivery systems using lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been under development. Our research group has been investigating the development of oral mucosal vaccines against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) using Lactobacillus casei IGM393 as an antigen delivery vehicle. Recombinant lactobacilli expressing SE antigens, FliC, SipC, and OmpC, have been constructed and orally administered to mice. Antigen specific immune responses and protective immunity were elicited after the immunization. For adjuvant-delivery, IL-1β-secreting L. casei was also engineered and its effects evaluated in vitro and in vivo. This article reviews a novel approach to the elimination of Salmonella via the development of a vaccine in lactobacilli.
Keywords: Lactobacillus, Salmonella, vaccine, flagellin, recombinant
BACKGROUND
Salmonellosis is caused by consumption of eggs contaminated with Salmonella and constitutes a major public health concern not only for developing countries but also industrialized countries. In Japan, 123 outbreaks of food poisoning involving 2,025 patients (1 death) caused by non-typhoidal Salmonella were reported in 2006 (annual report of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare). Although the number of cases has been decreasing since 2002 (465 cases, 5,833 patients, 2 deaths), salmonellosis remains a major food-borne disease. In 2010, the United States of America experienced a nationwide outbreak of Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) infection which was likely caused by contaminated eggs (CDC, http://www.cdc.gov/ salmonella/enteritidis/index. html). A survey by the Food Standards Agency of the United Kingdom found that 0.3% of UK-produced eggs on retail sale during 5 months in 2003 were contaminated with Salmonella of which 78% was SE. In another report, Salmonella was detected in 13.3% and 0.6% of eggs sampled that were produced in Spain and France, respectively [1].
Transmission of SE caused by external fecal contamination of egg shells can be avoided via cleaning and inspecting eggs; however, SE can latently infect the ovaries of hens contaminating the inside of the eggs before their shells are formed. In this occurs, there is no means of removing SE from the eggs. Hence, SE infection of hens has to be prevented in order to control egg-borne salmonellosis. Vaccination of hens is an effective option for avoiding SE infection and several laboratory or field trials have demonstrated the efficacy of SE vaccines [2,3,4,5,6]. The present anti-SE vaccines for hens are administered by injection and induce systemic immune responses; however, a totally effective vaccine has not yet been developed. Mucosal vaccines are considered more effective vaccine candidates because they can induce not only systemic immunity but also local immune responses at the mucosal site, which is the first line of defense against the pathogens.
Vaccine delivery systems using lactic acid bacteria (LAB) for mucosal immunization are under development. Many Lactobacillus and Lactococcus strains are generally regarded as safe (GRAS) because they have been consumed for centuries in fermented foods, or as probiotics originating as commensals of the human intestinal tract. It is now well documented that LAB can provide immune modulating/stimulating activities and contribute to health maintenance [7, 8]. Recent studies have revealed that several cell surface components of probiotic bacteria are recognized by immune cells via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) [9]. In particular, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), peptidoglycan (PG), and muramyl dipeptide (MDP), a subcomponent of PG, are known to be major immune stimulators recognized by Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 2 (NOD2) [10,11,12]. The combination of safety and immunogenicity of LAB satisfies the key requirements of vaccine-delivery vehicles. Several studies have demonstrated the potential of Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus strains for immunization as described in previous reviews [13,14,15]. Recently, recombinant lactobacilli expressing Salmonella antigens have been constructed and their potential as mucosal vaccines has been reported. In the present review, a series of studies on the development of vaccines against SE using Lactobacillus casei as a delivery vehicle are outlined.
Protective immunity against SE induced by FliC-displaying L. casei
Flagellin is a predominant subunit of flagella and includes highly conserved regions among Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [16]. In the bacterial flagellum, thousands of copies of flagellin are polymerized to form a helical tube structure [17]. A flagellin of Salmonella, FliC, has been reported to act as a protective antigen against SE infection in mice [18]. Thus, this antigen in combination with lactic acid bacteria would appear to be a suitable vaccine candidate. For expression of the heterologous antigen on the bacterial cell surface, plasmid vector, pLP401, was employed. A plasmid with an inserted fliC gene was introduced into L. casei IGM393. Since FliC fused to a signal peptide and LPXTG-included anchor motif, SE antigen was displayed on the cell surface. Mice were immunized with this FliC-producing L. casei (LCF) via the intragastric (i.g.) route. After immunization, the mice were challenged with SE, then sacrificed and the number of SE in spleens was counted. Compared to the non-immunized or the control strain of L. casei (LCN)-immunized mice, roughly 10-fold less SE cfu were recovered from the LCF-immunized mice. This result indicates that FliC-producing lactobacilli can confer protective immunity against SE. Because neither FliC-specific serum IgG nor fecal IgA were detected in this immunization, other immunity factors likely contributed to the protection. Ex vivo re-stimulation of spleen and mesenteric lymph node (MLN) cells with SE flagellin showed that relatively high levels of IFN-γ were produced from the cells of LCF-immunized mice compared to spleen/MLN cells from the other groups. Oral immunization with purified SE flagellin also provided protection against SE, albeit the immune responses were dissimilar to those of LCF-immunization. In particular, FliC-specific serum IgG and fecal IgA were induced but the level of IFN-γ produced by spleen/MLN cells was moderate. Even when the amount of FliC was normalized across the samples, FliC-displaying L. casei induced higher IFN-γ production than purified FliC or LCN mixed with purified FliC. This result suggests that the physical state of FliC is important for the adjuvanticity. Furthermore, a previous study reported that flagellin conjugated to polyacryl starch microparticles was less immunogenic than the free form of flagellin [18]. Taken together, both the physical location and components of the bacterial cells would appear to be important for the adjuvant effect. The immune responses determined in this study are summarized in Table 1. Detailed information is shown in the original paper [19].
Table 1. Immune responses induced by FliC-displaying L. casei and purified flagellin.
Dose (i.g.) | Dosage (per mouse) | α-FliC sIgA | α-FliC IgG | Specific IFN-γ | Protection |
LCF | 1 × 1010 cfu | – | – | +++ | + |
LCF | 1 × 109 cfu | – | – | ++ | ND |
LCN + Flagellin | 1 × 1010 cfu + 5 μg | – | – | + | ND |
LCN | 1 × 1010 cfu | – | – | – | – |
Flagellin | 50 μg | + | + | ++ | + |
Flagellin | 5 μg | – | – | + | ND |
Flagellin | 0.5 μg | – | – | – | ND |
PBS | – | – | – | – |
Immunological properties of recombinant L. casei displaying other Salmonella antigens with or without FliC fusion
Although FliC-displaying L. casei provides protection against SE, its efficacy is in need of improvement. Since FliC is not the only protective antigen which can be used, additional antigens might increase the efficacy of immunization. Two other Salmonella antigens, SipC and OmpC, were employed to investigate whether either of those proteins in combination with FliC improves protection against SE infection. SipC is a member of the proteins involved in type III secretion systems (TTSSs) and possesses dual functions, including translocation of effectors and actin modulation [20, 21]. A specific immune response to SipC is induced during infection by Salmonella, and the CD4+ T cell epitope I-Ad/SipC 381-94 has been defined [22]. The C-terminal region of SipC (cSipC), including the T cell epitope, was used for this study. OmpC is a major outer membrane porin of Salmonella, the function of which is the formation of a channel for the diffusion of nutrients and low molecular weight compounds across the outer membrane [23]. OmpC is also known as a protective antigen for vaccination against Salmonella because OmpC-specific antibodies exert a bactericidal effect [24,25,26]. The genes encoding either cSipC or OmpC were introduced into L. casei IGM393 via the pLP401 vector and expressed on the cell surface. Interestingly, the recombinant L. casei producing OmpC demonstrated decreased cell viability and elicited a relatively low TNF-α response in RAW264.7 cells. This unexpected characteristic of OmpC-producing strains was concluded to be due to weakened cell wall integrity [27]. In order to determine the combinational effect with FliC, recombinant lactobacilli displaying FliC-fusion antigens, cSipC fused to either the N- or C-terminus of FliC, and OmpC conjugated to the C-terminus of FliC, were also constructed. The immunological properties of these strains were evaluated both in vitro and in vivo, and the results are summarized in Table 2. In order to investigate whether these recombinant lactobacilli have TLR5-stimulating activity, IL-8 release from stimulated Caco-2 cells was determined. Remarkable amounts of IL-8 were detected from each culture stimulated with recombinant L. casei producing either FliC or FliC-fusion antigens, suggesting that these recombinant lactobacilli retain TLR5-stimulating activity. Parenteral immunization of mice with L. casei displaying FliC or FliC-fusion proteins evoked specific immune responses to the cell surface antigens. Interestingly, the α-FliC:α-cSipC IgG ratios were different between the groups immunized with either the recombinant lactobacilli expressing FliC-cSipC or cSipC-FliC, implying that physical structure affects the immunogenicity of cell surface-displayed antigens. In this study, an antigen located on the far side from a cell wall anchor tended to induce antibody production more efficiently. Compared to antibodies induced by soluble antigens, the IgG2a ratio was relatively high in antigen-specific IgG elicited by the recombinant L. casei. Cytokine profiling showed that soluble antigens promoted IL-4 secretion from stimulated spleen cells while the antigen-displaying lactobacilli accelerated IFN-γ production. These results suggest that antigens in combination with L. casei are likely to skew Th1 polarization. Detailed information of this study is provided in the original paper [28]. Oral immunization of mice with L. casei displaying either FliC-cSipC or FliC-OmpC provided protection against SE, albeit their efficacies were no better than that of L. casei expressing FliC alone. Analysis of antigen-specific immune responses indicated that only FliC but not the fusion partners were recognized by T cells (Kajikawa et al., unpublished data). In the case of oral immunization, unfortunately, the fusion of additional antigens to FliC is unlikely to sufficiently improve vaccines against SE using L. casei as a delivery vehicle.
Table 2. Immunological properties of recombinant L. casei displaying Salmonella antigens.
Recombinant L. casei | In vitro assays | Route of immunization | Immune responses | Protection against SE | References |
FliC | IL-8 from Caco-2 cells | i.g. | IFN-γ | Yes | 19 |
cSipC | ND | i.p. | α-cSipC IgG | ND | 28 |
FliC-cSipC | IL-8 from Caco-2 cells | i.p./i.g. | α-cSipC/FliC IgG IFN-γ | Yes | 28, Kajikawa et al. unpublished data |
cSipC-FliC | IL-8 from Caco-2 cells | i.p. | α-cSipC/FliC IgG | ND | 28 |
OmpC | Decrease in TNF-α from RAW264.7 cells | ND | ND | ND | 27 |
FliC-OmpC | ND | i.g. | IFN-γ | Yes | Kajikawa et al. unpublished data |
Adjuvant effects of recombinant L. casei secreting biologically active IL-1b
Oral administration is one of the most desirable means of immunization because it is needleless and can elicit both mucosal and systemic immune responses. However, development of oral vaccines is challenging due to the highly tolerant nature of gastrointestinal mucosal immunity. Lactic acid bacteria are considered safe but unlikely to be very immunogenic in oral immunization. In previous studies, a large amount of cells (>109 cfu) were repeatedly dosed in order to elicit decent immune responses [29,30,31]. For improvement of immunogenicity, adjuvants have been used in combination with antigen-producing lactic acid bacteria. As listed in Table 3, cytokines and other molecules are provided by recombinant lactic acid bacteria and improve vaccine efficacy. Steidler et al. carried out a pioneering study, which demonstrated the adjuvant effect provided by L. lactis intracellularly expressing TTFC and also secreting either murine interleukin-2 (IL-2) or IL-6 [32]. In another report, a single chain murine IL-12 was produced by L. lactis and enhanced antigen-specific Th1 cytokine production [33]. Recently, a unique strategy to accelerate bacterial uptake by dendritic cells (DCs) was developed by Mohamadzadeh et al. [34]. They achieved effective oral vaccination using recombinant Lactobacillus acidophilus secreting a protective antigen of Bacillus anthracis in combination with a DC-targeted peptide. In our previous study, recombinant L. casei secreting mouse IL-1β was constructed for adjuvant delivery [35]. IL-1β is produced by activated monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and other cells as a precursor, which is proteolytically processed into a mature form by IL-1β-converting enzyme (ICE), also known as caspase-1 [36]. Cleavage and activation of caspase-1 is triggered via recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by NOD-like receptors (NLRs) and formation of macromolecular complexes known as the inflammasomes [37]. Since NLRs are cytoplasmic proteins, viable pathogens, but not dead or commensal bacteria, can activate this cascade. We hypothesized that IL-1β provided by recombinant lactobacilli might mimic the “danger signal” of pathogens and complement the efficacy of vaccine candidates. IL-1β and other IL-1 family cytokines play an important role in modulating the adaptive immune response [38]. In fact, previous studies have demonstrated the adjuvant effect of IL-1β in both mucosal and systemic immunization [39]. In a previous study, a matured mouse IL-1β-encoding gene was combined with a bacterial signal sequence and introduced into L. casei. The resulting recombinant L. casei secreted IL-1β into its culture supernatant. The secreted proinflammatory cytokine elicited IL-8 production from Caco-2 cells, suggesting that the IL-1β was biologically active. In order to determine cytokine responses at the intestinal mucosa, a ligated intestinal loop assay followed by RT-PCR was performed. Among the detected cytokines, expression of IL-6 was specifically up-regulated in response to the IL-1β-secreting lactobacilli. IL-6 production by isolated Peyer’s patch cells was also confirmed in vitro. For evaluation of adjuvant effect, the IL-1β secreting L. casei mixed with heat-killed SE was orally administered to mice. Relatively high Salmonella-specific IgG in serum and IgA in feces was detected after the immunization. This result suggests that IL-1β-secreting L. casei provides an adjuvant effect which delivers a promising improvement to vaccine efficacy.
Table 3. Adjuvant molecules provided by recombinant lactic acid bacteria.
Host strain | Adjuvant molecules | Antigens | Effects | References |
L. lactis | Mouse IL-2/IL-6 | TTFC co-expression | Increase in Ab production (nasal) | 32 |
L. lactis | Mouse single chain IL-12 | E7 (HPV) Provided in trans | Protection improved | 33 |
L. casei | Mouse IL-1β | Heat killed SE Provided in trans | Increase in Ab production (oral, nasal) | 35, Kajikawa et al. unpublished data |
L. acidophilus | DC peptide | PA fusion | Protection improved | 34 |
L. acidophilus | FliC | Gag (HIV-1) co-expression | Increase in IgA-producing cells | Kajikawa et al. unpublished data |
CONCLUDING REMARKS
A series of studies on the development of vaccines against SE using L. casei as a delivery vehicle has been pursued. Recombinant lactobacilli displaying FliC or FliC-fused antigens can induce both innate and adoptive immune responses. Moreover, intragastric immunization of mice with these L. casei strains can confer protective immunity against SE infection. Biologically active matured murine IL-1β secreted by recombinant L. casei accelerated SE-specific antibody production. This adjuvant molecule may deliver a promising improvement to the efficacy of vaccines based on lactic acid bacteria.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. Todd R. Klaenhammer, Dr. Gregg A. Dean, and Evelyn Durmaz for scientific discussions.
REFERENCES
- 1.Little CL, Walsh S, Hucklesby L, Surman-Lee S, Pathak K, Hall Y, de Pinna E, Threlfall EJ, Maund A, Chan CH. 2006. Salmonella contamination in non-UK produced shell eggs on retail sale in some regions of England. Eurosurvellance 11. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 2.Davison S, Benson CE, Henzler DJ, Eckroade RJ. 1999. Field observations with Salmonella enteritidis bacterins. Avian Dis 43: 664–669 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Feberwee A, de Vries TS, Elbers AR, de Jong WA. 2000. Results of a Salmonella enteritidis vaccination field trial in broiler-breeder flocks in The Netherlands. Avian Dis 44: 249–255 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feberwee A, de Vries TS, Hartman EG, de Wit JJ, Elbers AR, de Jong WA. 2001. Vaccination against Salmonella enteritidis in Dutch commercial layer flocks with a vaccine based on a live Salmonella gallinarum 9R strain: evaluation of efficacy, safety, and performance of serologic Salmonella tests. Avian Dis 45: 83–91 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Miyamoto T, Kitaoka D, Withanage GS, Fukata T, Sasai K, Baba E. 1999. Evaluation of the efficacy of Salmonella enteritidis oil-emulsion bacterin in an intravaginal challenge model in hens. Avian Dis 43: 497–505 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yamane Y, Leonard JD, Kobatake R, Awamura N, Toyota Y, Ohta H, Otsuki K, Inoue T. 2000. A case study on Salmonella enteritidis (SE) origin at three egg-laying farms and its control with an S. enteritidis bacterin. Avian Dis 44: 519–526 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Borchers AT, Selmi C, Meyers FJ, Keen CL, Gershwin ME. 2009. Probiotics and immunity. J Gastroenterol 44: 26–46 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pagnini C, Saeed R, Bamias G, Arseneau KO, Pizarro TT, Cominelli F. 2010. Probiotics promote gut health through stimulation of epithelial innate immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 454–459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, de Keersmaecker SC. 2010. Host interactions of probiotic bacterial surface molecules: comparison with commensals and pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol 8: 171–184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Girardin SE, Boneca IG, Viala J, Chamaillard M, Labigne A, Thomas G, Philpott DJ, Sansonetti PJ. 2003. Nod2 is a general sensor of peptidoglycan through muramyl dipeptide (MDP) detection. J Biol Chem 278: 8869–8872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Matsuguchi T, Takagi A, Matsuzaki T, Nagaoka M, Ishikawa K, Yokokura T, Yoshikai Y. 2003. Lipoteichoic acids from Lactobacillus strains elicit strong tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducing activities in macrophages through Toll-like receptor 2. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 10: 259–266 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeuthen LH, Fink LN, Frøkiaer H. 2008. Toll-like receptor 2 and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 play divergent roles in the recognition of gut-derived lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in dendritic cells. Immunology 124: 489–502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mohamadzadeh M, Duong T, Hoover T, Klaenhammer TR. 2008. Targeting mucosal dendritic cells with microbial antigens from probiotic lactic acid bacteria. Expert Rev Vaccines 7: 163–174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Seegers JF. 2002. Lactobacilli as live vaccine delivery vectors: progress and prospects. Trends Biotechnol 20: 508–515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wells JM, Mercenier A. 2008. Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 6: 349–362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Winstanley C, Morgan JA. 1997. The bacterial flagellin gene as a biomarker for detection, population genetics and epidemiological analysis. Microbiology 143: 3071–3084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Macnab RM. 2003. How bacteria assemble flagella. Annu Rev Microbiol 57: 77–100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Strindelius L, Filler M, Sjöholm I. 2004. Mucosal immunization with purified flagellin from Salmonella induces systemic and mucosal immune responses in C3H/HeJ mice. Vaccine 22: 3797–3808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kajikawa A, Satoh E, Leer RJ, Yamamoto S, Igimi S. 2007. Intragastric immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus casei expressing flagellar antigen confers antibody-independent protective immunity against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Vaccine 25: 3599–3605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chang J, Chen J, Zhou D. 2005. Delineation and characterization of the actin nucleation and effector translocation activities of Salmonella SipC. Mol Microbiol 55: 1379–1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Galán JE, Collmer A. 1999. Type III secretion machines: bacterial devices for protein delivery into host cells. Science 284: 1322–1328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Musson JA, Hayward RD, Delvig AA, Hormaeche CE, Koronakis V, Robinson JH. 2002. Processing of viable Salmonella typhimurium for presentation of a CD4 T cell epitope from the Salmonella invasion protein C (SipC). Eur J Immunol 32: 2664–2671 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nikaido H, Vaara M. 1985. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol Rev 49: 1–32 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Isibasi A, Ortiz-Navarrete V, Paniagua J, Pelayo R, González CR, García JA, Kumate J. 1992. Active protection of mice against Salmonella typhi by immunization with strain-specific porins. Vaccine 10: 811–813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Isibasi A, Ortiz V, Vargas M, Paniagua J, González C, Moreno J, Kumate J. 1988. Protection against Salmonella typhi infection in mice after immunization with outer membrane proteins isolated from Salmonella typhi 9,12,d, Vi. Infect Immun 56: 2953–2959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kuusi N, Nurminen M, Saxen H, Valtonen M, Mäkelä PH. 1979. Immunization with major outer membrane proteins in experimental salmonellosis of mice. Infect Immun 25: 857–862 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kajikawa A, Igimi S. 2009. Reduction of tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducing capacity of recombinant Lactobacillus casei via expression of Salmonella OmpC. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2727–2734 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kajikawa A, Igimi S. 2010. Innate and acquired immune responses induced by recombinant Lactobacillus casei displaying flagellin-fusion antigen on the cell-surface. Vaccine 28: 3409–3415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.del Rio B, Dattwyler RJ, Aroso M, Neves V, Meirelles L, Seegers JF, Gomes-Solecki M. 2008. Oral immunization with recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum induces a protective immune response in mice with Lyme disease. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15: 1429–1435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Grangette C, Müller-Alouf H, Hols P, Goudercourt D, Delcour J, Turneer M, Mercenier A. 2004. Enhanced mucosal delivery of antigen with cell wall mutants of lactic acid bacteria. Infect Immun 72: 2731–2737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Poo H, Pyo HM, Lee TY, Yoon SW, Lee JS, Kim CJ, Sung MH, Lee SH. 2006. Oral administration of human papillomavirus type 16 E7 displayed on Lactobacillus casei induces E7-specific antitumor effects in C57/BL6 mice. Int J Cancer 119: 1702–1709 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Steidler L, Robinson K, Chamberlain L, Schofield KM, Remaut E, Le Page RW, Wells JM. 1998. Mucosal delivery of murine interleukin-2 (IL-2) and IL-6 by recombinant strains of Lactococcus lactis coexpressing antigen and cytokine. Infect Immun 66: 3183–3189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bermúdez-Humarán LG, Cortes-Perez NG, Lefèvre F, Guimarães V, Rabot S, Alcocer-Gonzalez JM, Gratadoux JJ, Rodriguez-Padilla C, Tamez-Guerra RS, Corthier G, Gruss A, Langella P. 2005. A novel mucosal vaccine based on live Lactococci expressing E7 antigen and IL-12 induces systemic and mucosal immune responses and protects mice against human papillomavirus type 16-induced tumors. J Immunol 175: 7297–7302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mohamadzadeh M, Duong T, Sandwick SJ, Hoover T, Klaenhammer TR. 2009. Dendritic cell targeting of Bacillus anthracis protective antigen expressed by Lactobacillus acidophilus protects mice from lethal challenge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 4331–4336 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kajikawa A, Masuda K, Katoh M, Igimi S. 2010. Adjuvant effects for oral immunization provided by recombinant Lactobacillus casei secreting biologically active murine interleukin-1β. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17: 43–48 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dinarello CA. 1998. Interleukin-1 beta, interleukin-18, and the interleukin-1 beta converting enzyme. Ann N Y Acad Sci 856: 1–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Delbridge LM, O’Riordan MX. 2007. Innate recognition of intracellular bacteria. Curr Opin Immunol 19: 10–16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dunne A, O’Neill LA. 2003. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal transduction during inflammation and host defense. Sci STKE 2003: re3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Staats HF, Ennis FA., Jr1999. IL-1 is an effective adjuvant for mucosal and systemic immune responses when coadministered with protein immunogens. J Immunol 162: 6141–6147 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]