Skip to main content
Applications in Plant Sciences logoLink to Applications in Plant Sciences
. 2013 Jan 2;1(1):apps.1200111. doi: 10.3732/apps.1200111

Isolation and characterization of microsatellite markers for Canavalia cathartica and C. lineata (Fabaceae)1

Asuka Yamashiro 2, Tadashi Yamashiro 3,5, Yoichi Tateishi 4
PMCID: PMC4105347  PMID: 25202474

Abstract

Premise of the study: Microsatellite markers were developed for the sea-dispersed legume Canavalia cathartica to investigate its genetic diversity and population structure. We also applied these microsatellite markers to the closely related species C. lineata.

Methods and Results: Ten primer sets were developed for C. cathartica, and all of the primers were amplified in C. lineata. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 13 and one to 10 for C. cathartica and C. lineata, respectively. The expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.375 to 0.870 and from 0.071 to 0.877 for C. cathartica and C. lineata, respectively.

Conclusions: The 10 microsatellite markers developed in this study can be used to analyze the population genetic structure of C. cathartica and other related taxa.

Keywords: Canavalia cathartica, Canavalia lineata, Fabaceae, microsatellite, polymorphism


Coastal plants often exhibit continuous distribution and are widely distributed. Coastal plant populations have been affected not only by Quaternary climatic oscillations but also by modern sea currents (Westberg and Kadereit, 2009), and they provide an opportunity to study various aspects of the phylogeography of flowering plants. However, except for mangrove species (e.g., Dodd et al., 2002), relatively little information is available regarding the patterns, levels of gene flow, and population genetic structure among coastal plants (e.g., Kadereit et al., 2005; Takayama et al., 2008; Westberg and Kadereit, 2009). Canavalia cathartica Thouars occurs in coastal regions from South to Southeast Asia and in East Africa (Sauer, 1964), and its seeds are dispersed by sea currents. The development of highly polymorphic microsatellite markers will provide valuable insight into the population genetic structure and dispersal mechanisms of sea-dispersed plants. In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of 10 microsatellite markers for C. cathartica and their applicability to the closely related sea-dispersed species C. lineata (Thunb.) DC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Genomic DNA was extracted from leaf samples collected at Takana, Iriomote Island, Japan (see Appendix 1 for voucher information) using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol. An enriched genomic DNA library was constructed as described by Bloor et al. (2001), with slight modifications. The genomic DNA was digested with three restriction enzymes, EcoRVI, AluI, and SspI (Toyobo Co., Osaka, Japan), and the resulting fragments, ranging from 0.4 to 1 kb, were excised from 1% low-melting-point agarose gels and purified. The fragments were then ligated into a blunt-end adapter as described by Bloor et al. (2001). Di- or trinucleotide sequences found within the library were enriched by hybridization to (AG)10, (GT)15, and (CAG)8 biotinylated oligonucleotides bound to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Additionally, to obtain a compound microsatellite primer (Lian et al., 2006), fragments flanked by a microsatellite at one end were amplified from the above libraries using the compound SSR primer (AC)6(AG)5 and oligo A (Bloor et al., 2001). The enriched fragments and amplified fragments were then ligated into pGEM-T Easy Vector (Promega Corporation) and transformed into DH5α-competent cells (Toyobo Co.). The recombinant DNA was sequenced in both directions on an ABI PRISM 310 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA) using M13 primers (F: 5′-GTTGAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′; R: 5′-GGAAACAGCTATGACCATGA-3′) and a DYEnamic ET Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). A total of 22 cloned sequences were used to design locus-specific primers with Primer3 Plus (Untergasser et al., 2007). Ten of the 22 primer pairs successfully amplified the target region. To evaluate the loci for polymorphisms, 34 and 43 leaf samples were used for C. cathartica (Ishigaki Island [N = 22] and Iriomote Island [N = 12]) and C. lineata (Nichinan, Miyazaki [N = 27] and Minami, Tokushima [N = 16]), respectively. Voucher specimens representing the sampled populations have been deposited in the herbarium at the College of Education, University of the Ryukyus (URO) (Appendix 1). PCR was performed using 3 ng of template DNA, 0.5 μM each primer, 0.25 mM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 50 mM KCl, and 0.25 U of Ex Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Bio Inc., Otsu, Shiga, Japan) in a final volume of 10 μL. The forward primers were labeled with one of three Beckman Coulter WellRED dyes (D2–4; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA). The cycling conditions were 2 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at the annealing temperature (Ta; Table 1), and 45 s at 72°C, with a final extension of 10 min at 72°C. The reactions were run using a PC-818S program temperature control system (Astec, Fukuoka, Japan). Genotypes were determined using CEQ 8000 Fragment Analysis software (CEQ 8000; Beckman Coulter, Pasadena, California, USA) after electrophoresis with a CEQ 8000 Genetic Analysis System (Beckman Coulter). A GenomeLab DNA Size Standard Kit (400; Beckman Coulter) was used to determine allele size. PCR using the 10 primer sets resulted in polymorphic, single-locus amplification products (Table 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics of the 10 microsatellites developed in Canavalia cathartica.

Locus Primer sequences (5′–3′) Repeat motif WellRED dyea Ta (°C) Size range (bp)b GenBank accession no.
CANA1 F: TTTCATTTGCTGGTGAACGC (GT)30 D2 55 83–111 AB618267
R: CTTCATTGACCCATACACAC
CANA2 F: ATGGAGGGTTCGGTGGGGAGA (AG)16 D2 58 214–236 AB618268
R: CACCACCATCCTTTCCCTTTT
CANA3 F: TTAGATGTTGCAAGTGCATGGG (GT)30 D4 55 208–260 AB618269
R: GCAGCATTTCAAACTTGGGA
CANA4 F: ATTTATGACCAAATAGTCTC (AG)35 D3 55 252–296 AB618270
R: ACCCCTGAAAAAGTGGTGTGT
CANA5 F: CAACAACAACGAAGAGGAAGA (AC)19 D2 55 267–293 AB618271
R: GAGGTGGACACACACTCCTT
CANA6 F: TCAAATTGGTCACAACTCGC (TGC)11 D2 55 148–196 AB618272
R: ATGAACAGCCAGAATGCATC
CANA7 F: TGTTTTTCCAGTGCCGGGAGGA (CAG)11 D4 60 255–294 AB618273
R: AATTTTTCTCCTCCTAACCCAGCC
CANA-C1 F: ACACACACACACAGAGAGAGAG (AC)6(AG)18 D3 60 212–240 AB618274
R: TTGGATTCTTCTTCTTCACCTTCCG
CANA-C2 F: ACACACACACACAGAGAGAGAG (AC)6(AG)14 D3 55 126–154 AB618275
R: CTGATAGATCCTCAGGGGAA
CANA-C3 F: ACACACACACACAGAGAGAGAG (AC)6(AG)7 D4 55 134–140 AB618276
R: TCTGCTATCTGTTTTGCCC

Note: Ta = annealing temperature.

a

Forward primer label.

b

Observed size range from 34 samples of C. cathartica.

The results of our initial screening of C. cathartica and C. lineata are summarized in Table 2. Ten loci were polymorphic, with two to 13 and two to 10 alleles for C. cathartica and C. lineata, respectively, except for CANA4 and CANA7 in the Minami population. The observed heterozygosity values ranged from 0.333 to 0.919 and from 0.074 to 0.875 for C. cathartica and C. lineata, respectively. The expected heterozygosity values ranged from 0.375 to 0.870 and 0.071 to 0.877 for C. cathartica and C. lineata, respectively. Analyses of Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium and linkage disequilibrium were performed using GENEPOP version 3.3 (Raymond and Rousset, 1995). No significant heterozygote deficiency (P < 0.05) was detected for any of the loci except for CANA5 in the Iriomote Island population. For each population, no significant linkage disequilibrium was found among the 45 possible pairwise comparisons (P = 0.05 after sequential Bonferroni correction [Rice, 1989]).

Table 2.

Results of initial primer screening in Canavalia cathartica and C. lineata.

C. cathartica C. lineata
Ishigaki Island (N = 22) Iriomote Island (N = 12) Nichinan (N = 27) Minami (N = 16)
Locus A Ho He HWE A Ho He HWE A Ho He HWE A Ho He HWE
CANA1 12 0.818 0.865 0.087 11 0.750 0.858 0.140 4 0.704 0.736 0.188 7 0.688 0.779 0.168
CANA2 8 0.727 0.806 0.276 6 0.833 0.813 0.488 2 0.370 0.346 0.791 3 0.563 0.510 0.603
CANA3 13 0.864 0.870 0.256 7 0.667 0.840 0.046 9 0.852 0.834 0.093 4 0.563 0.455 1.000
CANA4 8 0.682 0.669 0.298 3 0.333 0.392 0.411 7 0.852 0.694 0.078 1
CANA5 8 0.864 0.635 1.000 5 0.500 0.691 0.052* 3 0.444 0.501 0.245 2 0.313 0.264 1.000
CANA6 12 0.682 0.751 0.246 11 0.917 0.840 0.863 6 0.778 0.653 0.173 8 0.688 0.807 0.082
CANA7 7 0.591 0.760 0.104 8 0.750 0.806 0.466 5 0.444 0.453 0.485 1
CANA-C1 10 0.864 0.819 0.734 10 0.818 0.847 0.132 7 0.815 0.747 0.313 10 0.813 0.877 0.082
CANA-C2 12 0.864 0.843 0.127 9 0.750 0.847 0.101 2 0.074 0.071 1.000 2 0.313 0.342 0.566
CANA-C3 4 0.818 0.681 0.922 2 0.500 0.375 1.000 2 0.259 0.226 1.000 2 0.875 0.492 1.000

Note: A = number of alleles; He = expected heterozygosity; Ho = observed heterozygosity; HWE = Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; N = number of individuals.

*

Deviations from HWE (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The 10 microsatellite markers for C. cathartica revealed high levels of polymorphism, suggesting that they can be used to analyze the population genetic structure and genetic diversity of the species. Moreover, the ability to cross-amplify C. lineata sequences indicates that these markers may be used in the cross-amplification of other Canavalia species.

Appendix 1.

Voucher specimens of Canavalia cathartica and C. lineata used in this study. Voucher specimens are deposited at the Herbarium of the College of Education, University of the Ryukyus (URO).

Species Locality Latitude Longitude Voucher no.
C. cathartica Takana, Iriomote Island, Okinawa 24°22′57″N 123°53′18″E T. Yamashiro 11109
Banna, Ishigaki Island, Okinawa 24°22′19″N 124°09′39″E T. Yamashiro 11113
C. lineata Nichinan, Miyazaki 31°40′35″N 131°27′15″E T. Yamashiro 11203
Minami, Tokushima 33°70′61″N 134°51′68″E T. Yamashiro 11120

LITERATURE CITED

  1. Bloor P. A., Barker F. S., Watts P. C., Noyes H. A., Kemp S. J. 2001. Microsatellite libraries by enrichment. Website http://www.genomics.liv.ac.uk/animal/RESEARCH/MICROSAT.PDF [accessed 10 December 2012].
  2. Dodd R. S., Afzal-Rafii Z., Kahani N., Budrick J. 2002. Land barriers and open oceans: Effects on gene diversity and population structure in Avicennia germinans L. (Avicenniaceae). Molecular Ecology 11: 1327–1338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kadereit J. W., Arafeh R., Somogyi G., Westberg E. 2005. Terrestrial growth and marine dispersal? Comparative phylogeography of five coastal plant species at a European scale. Taxon 54: 861–876 [Google Scholar]
  4. Lian C., Wadud M. A., Geng Q. F., Shimatani K., Hogetsu T. 2006. An improved technique for isolating codominant compound microsatellite markers. Journal of Plant Research 119: 415–417 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Raymond M., Rousset F. 1995. GENEPOP (version 3.3): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86: 248–249 [Google Scholar]
  6. Rice W. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution 43: 223–225 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sauer J. 1964. Revision of Canavalia. Brittonia 16: 106–181 [Google Scholar]
  8. Takayama K., Tateishi Y., Murata Y. J., Kjita T. 2008. Gene flow and population subdivision in a pantropical plant with sea-drifted seeds Hibiscus tiliaceus and its allied species: Evidence from microsatellite analyses. Molecular Ecology 17: 2730–2742 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Untergasser A., Nijveen H., Rao X., Bisseling T., Geurts R., Leunissen J. A. M. 2007. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Research 35: W71–W74 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Westberg E., Kadereit J. W. 2009. The influence of sea currents, past disruption of gene flow and species biology on the phylogeographical structure of coastal flowering plants. Journal of Biogeography 36: 1398–1410 [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applications in Plant Sciences are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES