Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 18.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Res. 2014 Jul 18;115(3):326–328. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.304487

Ca2+ in the Cleft: Fast and Fluorescent

Xiang Luo 1, Joseph A Hill 1,2
PMCID: PMC4105843  NIHMSID: NIHMS606673  PMID: 25035130

Calcium ion (Ca2+) is a universal second messenger that governs a vast array of biological phenomena, including muscle contraction, neuronal transmission, fertilization, aging, cell death and hormone secretion1. Perturbations of intracellular Ca2+ signaling underlie a host of pathologic states, including the myocardial diseases of ischemia/reperfusion injury, arrhythmia, myocyte hypertrophy, and heart failure2.

Despite the pivotal role of Ca2+ homeostasis in myocyte physiology and disease, large gaps exist in our understanding of its compartmentalization within subcellular microdomains and its trafficking among them. A vast literature has glossed over the finely tuned handling of intracellular Ca2+, its sites of storage, release, action, and reuptake, focusing instead on crude measures of bulk Ca2+ concentration. In so doing, the intricacies of spatiotemporal handling of Ca2+ – occurring at the scales of milliseconds and nanometers – are blurred, and our understanding is incomplete.

Appreciation of the pivotal role of Ca2+ in heart function dates to the late 19th century, when Sidney Ringer discovered that this cation is absolutely required for cardiac mechanical function3. Cardiac contraction is triggered by influx of a small amount of Ca2+ through voltage-gated L-type Ca2+ channels (LTCC) embedded in the cell surface membrane. This Ca2+ influx, in turn, triggers release of much larger amounts of Ca2+ from sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) stores through ryanodine receptors (RyRs), a process termed Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release (CICR). Thus, LTCC Ca2+ influx gates CICR; in the converse sense, Ca2+ released by CICR feeds back to control LTCC influx4. The end result is an elaborate, finely tuned, and self-regulated cascade of events that controls every heart beat.

This intricate dynamics of this process occurs within, and is facilitated by, the microarchitecture of the junctional cleft, the region within the myocyte separating the SR and intramyocyte invaginations of the cell membrane (T-tubules)5. This zone, also termed the dyad, represents a volume of ~10−3 fL in cardiac muscle6, with ~12 nm separating the LTCC within the T-tubule from the RyR where SR Ca2+ release takes place7.

Under steady-state conditions, Ca2+ entering through the LTCC is extruded back out of the cell by the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger8. SR Ca2+ stores are replenished by the SERCA pump. Ca2+ concentrations in cellular microdomains, and their time-dependent changes, are also governed by Ca2+ buffering proteins, including calsequestrin and S100A1, and Ca2+ storage and release in mitochondria.

As complex as this picture is already, evidence is emerging that dyads differ in their structure and molecular architecture9. In a variety of heart diseases, T-tubule and dyadic junction remodeling are seen, which very likely participates in disease pathogenesis and distorted Ca2+ release7. For all these reasons, it is of obvious importance to glean a more sophisticated understanding of Ca2+ handling within the junctional cleft, ideally with the spatial and temporal resolution required by the underlying biology.

Ca2+ sensors

Using Ca2+-sensitive bioluminescent probes and fluorescent indicators, whole cell Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) during both systole and diastole have been studied extensively. The first experiments visualizing intracellular Ca2+ transients were reported in frog heart10 and canine Purkinje fibers11 using the Ca2+-sensitive bioluminescent protein aequorin. As aequorin is membrane impermeant, these and subsequent experiments were performed by injecting protein purified from the jellyfish Aequorea directly into cells. The associated technical challenges, coupled with modest signal-to-noise ratio afforded by the sensor, limited the utility of this approach.

Next, development of small molecule chemical fluorescence indicators with high Ca2+ affinity and fast kinetics, such as Fura-212, as well as use of acetoxymethylated esters for non-invasive cell loading, were breakthroughs that expanded the feasibility of Ca2+ imaging in single cardiomyocytes13. Later, the advent of confocal microscopy and fast, high-contrast fluorescein- and rhodamine-based Ca2+ indicators, such as Fluo-3, led to characterization of Ca2+ sparks, the result of single-dyad Ca2+ events14.

Whereas development of these diffusible indicators greatly facilitated our understanding of cardiac EC coupling, they afforded neither the submicron spatial resolution nor the rapid on- and off-kinetics required for a complete understanding of this intricate Ca2+ biology. It is estimated that Ca2+ ions diffuse within myocytes at a rate of ~100 μm/s15 and typically traverse a distance of ~1.8 μm16. Thus, conventional fluorescent Ca2+ indicators substantially underestimate local peak Ca2+ levels and report a low-resolution profile of local Ca2+ gradients17.

The next leap in Ca2+ imaging technology was introduction of genetically encoded Ca2+ indicators (GECIs). GECIs offer advantages not achievable with conventional chemical Ca2+ probes, including precise targeting within cellular micro(nano)-compartments, prolonged imaging over days and months, and simultaneous multicolor Ca2+ imaging18. Among the most popular protein calcium sensors are the GCaMPs, which are variants of enhanced green fluorescent protein (cpEGFP) coupled to a C-terminal Ca2+ sensor (calmodulin) and a calmodulin-binding M13 peptide at the N terminus19. Upon Ca2+ binding, the calmodulin moiety interacts with the M13 peptide, triggeringstructural reorganization in proximity to the cpEGFP, deprotonation of the chromophore, and increased fluorescence20. GCaMPs are rapidly emerging as valuable tools for in situ monitoring of Ca2+ activity in neurons21 and heart22.

In this issue of the journal, Despa et al23 describe two novel Ca2+ sensors specifically targeted to the junctional cleft. One harbors GCaMP2.2, a T203V mutation of GCaMP2 with intensified brightness and dynamic range21. The second, GCaMP2.2Low, is a variant with reduced Ca2+ affinity, harboring a D133E mutation. Each construct was targeted to the dyadic cleft by means of covalent coupling to the N-terminus of FKBP12.6, a protein which binds with high affinity and selectivity to RyRs. Both fusion proteins retained high affinity for RyRs (Kd ~ 15-45 nmol/L), albeit somewhat lower than native FKBP12.6 (1 nmol/L)24. A striated pattern of fluorescence, competed away by FKBP12.6, was observed in cultured adult rat ventricular cardiomyocytes, suggesting that both FKBP12.6-tagged sensors target selectively to the junctional cleft.

What have these new probes taught us?

GCaMP2.2Low manifests baseline fluorescence and a dynamic range similar to GCaMP2.2, but its affinity for Ca2+ is 10-fold lower (Kd 5 μmol/L vs. 450 nmol/L). These investigators capitalized on these differences to quantify the high [Ca2+] expected in the junctional cleft. Prior to this work, estimates of Ca2+ transient amplitudes near Ca2+ release sites ranged between 10 μM8 to 100 μM25, and peak amplitude was estimated to occur 5 10 ms after depolarization, with recovery occurring within 15-50 ms8, 26. In contrast, the global Ca2+ transient within the cytoplasm is many-fold lower, reaching a maximum of ~1 μM within ~70-100 ms8. Thus, GCaMP2.2Low, with its low Ca2+ affinity, could provide reliable measures of Ca2+ transients within the junctional cleft, whereas GCaMP2.2, with its high Ca2+ affinity, is optimal for measuring diastolic [Ca2+]I.

With these newly engineered probes in hand, these investigators first calibrated the targeted and untargeted sensors in the myocyte environment, which reduced affinities by ~2-fold. However, FKBP12.6-targeting did not alter the Ca2+ affinity of either. Next, they set out to measure Ca2+ dynamics, reporting that [Ca2+]Cleft reaches higher levels (1.3 μM) with faster kinetics than global [Ca2+]Bulk (0.5 μM at peak). However, estimates of peak [Ca2+]Cleft reported with this sensor are much smaller than previous estimates, and the time to [Ca2+]Cleft peak (46 ms) is also much slower (5 10 ms). GCaMPs manifest significantly slower response kinetics (typically τon 20 ms-1.4 s and τoff 0.4-5 s) compared with synthetic BAPTA-based dyes (e.g. Oregon Green 488 BAPTA 5N, τon <1 ms)27. As acknowledged by the authors, the very rapid rises and falls in [Ca2+]Cleft almost certainly exceed the kinetics of the GCaMP sensor. In this respect, it is highly likely that the low Ca2+ affinity, cleft-targeted GCaMP2.2Low significantly under-estimated peak Ca2+ transients.

That being said, these novel sensors are ideally suited to measuring diastolic [Ca2+]Cleft. As Ca2+ leak from the SR has been implicated in a variety of disorders, including heart failure28, such measures are of great interest. To address this, the authors compared the signal emitted by GCaMP2.2 ([Ca2+]Bulk) with that emitted by GCaMP2.2-FKBP12.6 ([Ca2+]Cleft), noting that [Ca2+]Cleft was nearly 2-fold higher than [Ca2+]Bulk (194 μM versus 100 μM). Next, by selectively interrupting Ca2+ flux through LTCC versus RyRs, the authors went on to provide evidence that this resting diastolic gradient of Ca2+ stems from RyR leak, rather than sarcolemmalCa2+ flux.

The future is fast and bright

Whereas these ingenious, cleft-targeted probes have provided novel insights already, challenges remain, especially given their slow kinetics. Recently, a new generation of fast GCaMPs was introduced27. One of them, GCaMP6f, is reported to have fast kinetics (the fastest among all currently known GCaMPs), high affinity, and robust dynamic range; it was successfully implemented to measure single neuron synapse events29. Shang et al30 fused GCaMP6f with junctin or triadin and reported high resolution images of junctional Ca2+ at individual dyads, so-called “Ca2+ nanosparks”. Nevertheless, GCaMP6f is still not fast enough to accurately track the extremely rapidly rising and fast-decaying Ca2+ gradient in the junctional cleft31.

Whereas GCaMP2.2Low – FKBP12.6 may not provide accurate measures of junctional cleft Ca2+ transients during excitation, GCaMP2.2 – FKBP12.6 is an ideal sensor to measure [Ca2+]Cleft during diastole. Because heart failure and cardiac arrhythmias are often associated with dyssynchronous Ca2+ leak in diastole, this probe is likely to prove useful in dissecting underlying mechanisms. Also, high diastolic [Ca2+]Cleft may play an important role beyond governing E-C coupling by regulating local signaling cascades (e.g. calcineurin or CaMKII)32. As a result, these clever new tools are likely to be informative in multiple domains of cardiovascular biology.

Acknowledgments

Sources of Funding

This work was supported by grants from the NIH (HL-120732; HL-100401), AHA (SDG18440002), CPRIT (RP110486P3), and the Leducq Foundation (11CVD04).

References

  • 1.Berridge MJ. Calcium signalling remodelling and disease. Biochemical Society transactions. 2012;40:297–309. doi: 10.1042/BST20110766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Heineke J, Molkentin JD. Regulation of cardiac hypertrophy by intracellular signalling pathways. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology. 2006;7:589–600. doi: 10.1038/nrm1983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ringer S. A further contribution regarding the influence of the different constituents of the blood on the contraction of the heart. The Journal of physiology. 1883;4:29–42. 23. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1883.sp000120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wier WG, Egan TM, Lopez-Lopez JR, Balke CW. Local control of excitation-contraction coupling in rat heart cells. The Journal of physiology. 1994;474:463–471. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Franzini-Armstrong C, Protasi F, Ramesh V. Comparative ultrastructure of ca2+ release units in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1998;853:20–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb08253.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cannell MB, Kong CH. Local control in cardiac e-c coupling. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2012;52:298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sipido KR, Cheng H. T-tubules and ryanodine receptor microdomains: On the road to translation. Cardiovascular research. 2013;98:159–161. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Acsai K, Antoons G, Livshitz L, Rudy Y, Sipido KR. Microdomain [ca(2)(+)] near ryanodine receptors as reported by l-type ca(2)(+) and na+/ca(2)(+) exchange currents. The Journal of physiology. 2011;589:2569–2583. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.202663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scriven DR, Asghari P, Moore ED. Microarchitecture of the dyad. Cardiovascular research. 2013;98:169–176. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Allen DG, Blinks JR. Calcium transients in aequorin-injected frog cardiac muscle. Nature. 1978;273:509–513. doi: 10.1038/273509a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wier WG. Calcium transients during excitation-contraction coupling in mammalian heart: Aequorin signals of canine purkinje fibers. Science. 1980;207:1085–1087. doi: 10.1126/science.7355274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY. A new generation of ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1985;260:3440–3450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wier WG, Cannell MB, Berlin JR, Marban E, Lederer WJ. Cellular and subcellular heterogeneity of [ca2+]i in single heart cells revealed by fura-2. Science. 1987;235:325–328. doi: 10.1126/science.3798114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cheng H, Lederer WJ, Cannell MB. Calcium sparks: Elementary events underlying excitation-contraction coupling in heart muscle. Science. 1993;262:740–744. doi: 10.1126/science.8235594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jaffe LF. The path of calcium in cytosolic calcium oscillations: A unifying hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1991;88:9883–9887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Parker I, Zang WJ, Wier WG. Ca2+ sparks involving multiple ca2+ release sites along z-lines in rat heart cells. The Journal of physiology. 1996;497(Pt 1):31–38. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Smith GD, Keizer JE, Stern MD, Lederer WJ, Cheng H. A simple numerical model of calcium spark formation and detection in cardiac myocytes. Biophysical journal. 1998;75:15–32. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77491-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Perez Koldenkova V, Nagai T. Genetically encoded ca(2+) indicators: Properties and evaluation. Biochimica et biophysica acta. 2013;1833:1787–1797. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nakai J, Ohkura M, Imoto K. A high signal-to-noise ca(2+) probe composed of a single green fluorescent protein. Nature biotechnology. 2001;19:137–141. doi: 10.1038/84397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang Q, Shui B, Kotlikoff MI, Sondermann H. Structural basis for calcium sensing by gcamp2. Structure. 2008;16:1817–1827. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2008.10.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Tian L, Hires SA, Mao T, Huber D, Chiappe ME, Chalasani SH, Petreanu L, Akerboom J, McKinney SA, Schreiter ER, Bargmann CI, Jayaraman V, Svoboda K, Looger LL. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved gcamp calcium indicators. Nature methods. 2009;6:875–881. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tallini YN, Ohkura M, Choi BR, Ji G, Imoto K, Doran R, Lee J, Plan P, Wilson J, Xin HB, Sanbe A, Gulick J, Mathai J, Robbins J, Salama G, Nakai J, Kotlikoff MI. Imaging cellular signals in the heart in vivo: Cardiac expression of the high-signal ca2+ indicator gcamp2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006;103:4753–4758. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509378103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Despa S, Shui B, Bossuyt J, Lang D, Kotlikoff MI, Bers DM. Junctional cleft [ca2+]i measurements using novel cleft-targeted ca2+ sensors. Circulation research. 2014;115:xxx–xxx. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.303582. in this issue. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Guo T, Cornea RL, Huke S, Camors E, Yang Y, Picht E, Fruen BR, Bers DM. Kinetics of fkbp12.6 binding to ryanodine receptors in permeabilized cardiac myocytes and effects on ca sparks. Circulation research. 2010;106:1743–1752. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.219816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shannon TR, Wang F, Puglisi J, Weber C, Bers DM. A mathematical treatment of integrated ca dynamics within the ventricular myocyte. Biophysical journal. 2004;87:3351–3371. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.047449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cannell MB, Kong CH, Imtiaz MS, Laver DR. Control of sarcoplasmic reticulum ca2+ release by stochastic ryr gating within a 3d model of the cardiac dyad and importance of induction decay for cicr termination. Biophysical journal. 2013;104:2149–2159. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Sun XR, Badura A, Pacheco DA, Lynch LA, Schneider ER, Taylor MP, Hogue IB, Enquist LW, Murthy M, Wang SS. Fast gcamps for improved tracking of neuronal activity. Nature communications. 2013;4:2170. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Marks AR. Calcium cycling proteins and heart failure: Mechanisms and therapeutics. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2013;123:46–52. doi: 10.1172/JCI62834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen TW, Wardill TJ, Sun Y, Pulver SR, Renninger SL, Baohan A, Schreiter ER, Kerr RA, Orger MB, Jayaraman V, Looger LL, Svoboda K, Kim DS. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal activity. Nature. 2013;499:295–300. doi: 10.1038/nature12354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shang W, Lu F, Sun T, Xu J, Li LL, Wang Y, Wang G, Chen L, Wang X, Cannell MB, Wang SQ, Cheng H. Imaging ca2+ nanosparks in heart with a new targeted biosensor. Circulation research. 2014;114:412–420. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhao YT, Valdivia HH. Ca2+ nanosparks: Shining light on the dyadic cleft but missing the intensity of its signal. Circulation research. 2014;114:396–398. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.303112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goonasekera SA, Molkentin JD. Unraveling the secrets of a double life: Contractile versus signaling ca2+ in a cardiac myocyte. Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology. 2012;52:317–322. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2011.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES