. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 22.

Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2013 Jun 3;13(5):832–842. doi: 10.1037/a0032672

Table 3.

Regulation Effects on the Three Response Channels in Study 2

Comparison	Unregulated	Suppression	Acceptance	Main Effect
			Negative context
Experience (/±100)	−33.96 (2.51)	−35.27 (2.92)	−34.95 (2.35)	F(2,66)=0.65, p=51
Expressivity (%)	125.09 (3.98)	106.50 (1.43)^**	128.39 (4.83)	F(1,48)=20.15, p<.001, η2=.36
Physiological activation (Δz)	−0.003 (0.016)	−0.069 (0.019)^**	−0.008 (0.017)	F(2,69)=7.43, p<.01, η2=17

			Positive context
Experience (/±100)	24.68 (1.95)	22.67 (2.03)	26.74 (1.97)^*	F(2,62)=5.93, p<.01, η2=14
Expressivity (%)	130.98 (7.20)	97.72 (2.05)^**	156.49 (12.20)^**	F(1,50)=18.20, p<.001, η2=.34
Physiological activation (Δz)	0.048 (0.020)	−0.025 (0.018)^**	0.037 (0.014)	F(2,63)=6.18, p<.01, η2=.15

Note: p<.05 and

^**

p<.01 with the unregulated condition, evaluated by simple contrasts