Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2014 Mar 18;135(6):1454–1469. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28785

Infectious, autoimmune, and allergic diseases and risk of Hodgkin lymphoma in children and adolescents: A Children’s Oncology Group (COG) study

Amy M Linabery 1, Erik B Erhardt 2, Rachel K Fonstad 1, Richard F Ambinder 3, Greta R Bunin 4, Julie A Ross 1,5, Logan G Spector 1,5, Seymour Grufferman 6
PMCID: PMC4107091  NIHMSID: NIHMS568353  PMID: 24523151

Abstract

An infectious origin for pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has long been suspected and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been implicated in a subset of cases. Increased HL incidence in children with congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, consistent associations between autoimmune diseases and adult HL, and genome-wide association and other genetic studies together suggest immune dysregulation is involved in lymphomagenesis. Here, healthy control children identified by random digit dialing were matched on sex, race/ethnicity, and age to HL cases diagnosed in 1989-2003 at 0-14 years at Children’s Oncology Group institutions. Parents of 517 cases and 784 controls completed telephone interviews, including items regarding medical histories. Tumor EBV status was determined for 355 cases. Using conditional logistic regression, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of HL. Cases were more likely to have had an infection >1 year prior to HL diagnosis (OR=1.69, 95% CI:0.98-2.91); case siblings were also more likely to have had a prior infection (OR=2.04, 95% CI:1.01-4.14). Parental history of autoimmunity associated with increased EBV+ HL risk (OR=2.97, 95% CI:1.34-6.58), while having a parent (OR=1.47, 95% CI:1.01-2.14) or sibling (OR=1.62, 95% CI:1.11-2.36) with an allergy was associated with EBV− HL. These results may indicate true increased risk for infections and increased risk with family history of autoimmune and allergic conditions that varies by tumor EBV status, or they may be attributable to inaccurate recall. In addition to employing biomarkers to confirm the role of immune-modulating conditions in pediatric HL, future studies should focus on family-based designs.

Keywords: Hodgkin lymphoma, children, infections, autoimmune disease, allergies


Little research has been devoted to understanding the causes of pediatric and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), the 8th most common malignancy among those <15 years of age in the U.S.1 Established risk factors include immunodeficiency,2,3 infection with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV),4,5 and family history of HL.6 In the US and other economically developed countries, HL diagnosed among children <15 years has distinct demographic and clinical characteristics from HL in older adolescents and young adults (AYA; 15-39 years) and older adults (≥50 years), including a modestly higher incidence rate in males versus females (incidence rate ratios: 1.13 vs. 0.71 and 1.56, respectively),1 intermediate distribution of the nodular sclerosis (NS, 68% vs. 74% and 39%) and mixed cellularity (MC, 13% vs. 9% and 23%) subtypes,1 and a higher proportion of cases with EBV-infected tumor cells than AYA cases (47% vs. 29% and 50%).4 In addition, opposite trends have been reported for the effects of increasing socio-economic status (SES), birth order, and sibship size on HL risk in children and young adolescents versus AYA.7-9 These differences imply a unique HL etiology among children.5

While an infectious cause for HL had long been suspected, detection of higher serum anti-EBV antibody titers preceding HL diagnosis10 and EBV DNA in Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells,11 and demonstration that EBV can transform lymphoblastoid cells in vitro12 cemented the infectious origins for at least a portion of HLs. Evidence of latent EBV infection, i.e., EBV-encoded small RNAs (EBER) or latent membrane protein-1, has been found in ~50% of pediatric tumors overall, most notably in MC HL (~80%).4 That 50-60% of individuals are seropositive for EBV by 4-6 years of age in economically developed countries,13 yet only a small fraction of the population develops HL, suggests important individual differences in timing and response to infection.

At the level of the microenvironment, HL tumors display a skewed immune cell profile, with a reduced pool of Type 1 helper T (Th1) cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, and natural killer cells, and elevated Th2 cells, regulatory T cells, and eosinophils.14 Results of several lines of inquiry also support a role for global immune dysregulation in the pathogenesis of HL. Children with congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, including ataxia telangiectasia, common variable immunodeficiency, and HIV, are at substantially increased risk for HL compared to the general population.2,3 Rheumatoid arthritis has been consistently associated with HL in adults, conferring an estimated 3.3-fold greater risk,15 while associations between other autoimmune diseases and HL have been observed in adults as well.16,17 In addition, genome-wide association18 and other genetic studies19 have identified variants in HLA genes linked to increased HL susceptibility.

Etiologic research in adult HL has demonstrated that there are risk factors shared by HL patients irrespective of EBV tumor status, and risk factors that are specific to EBV+ versus EBV− HL.4,18,19 To our knowledge, no prior studies have examined risk by tumor EBV status in pediatric and adolescent HL, although the available data indicate such stratification is warranted.

Given the compelling evidence implicating immune dysregulation in HL etiology, we evaluated associations between a personal or family history of infections and other immune-mediated conditions and HL in children and adolescents, overall and by tumor EBV status, using data from the largest case-control study conducted to date.

Materials and Methods

The current analysis employed data and specimens collected through Children’s Cancer Group (CCG; now Children’s Oncology Group, COG) Protocol E13: “Case-control study of Hodgkin’s Disease in Children.”

Cases

Eligible cases were identified via the CCG/COG patient registry; eligibility criteria included a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of HL between the ages of 0-14 years at a participating CCG/COG institution in the United States, Puerto Rico, or Canada between January 31, 1989 and July 28, 2003, physician approval for contact, telephone in residence, and at least one biological parent that spoke English or Spanish and consented to participate. Deceased cases meeting these criteria were eligible. Once the treating physician had provided permission to contact the family, an initial phone contact was made to determine potential interest and hard copies of study materials (study description, interview guide, consent form) were sent by conventional mail.

Controls

Healthy control children were identified via random digit dialing (RDD) as described previously,20 and were individually matched to cases on sex, race/ethnicity, birth date (+/− 1 year for cases <5 years, +/− 3 years for cases 5-14 years), and geographic location. Children were eligible if they had no prior cancer diagnosis, had a telephone in the residence, and had a biological parent that spoke English or Spanish and consented to an interview. To increase statistical power, up to three controls were selected for cases 0-9 years at diagnosis due to the rarity of HL in this age group, while one control was selected for cases aged 10-14 years. To enhance the matching success rate, the criteria were relaxed near the end of the study using a sequential algorithm which allowed for an increased age matching increment, a different race/ethnicity, or a neighboring area code, in turn. Control parents were provided with the same study materials as case parents by mail prior to interview and gave verbal consent before the interview.

Interviews

Parental report of medical histories, gathered through separate structured telephone interviews with mothers and fathers, was used in this analysis. Interviews were conducted a mean 1.11 (SD=0.97) years after diagnosis for cases and 2.79 (1.97) years after the assigned reference date for controls. A parent of each case (n=517) and control (n=784) was asked if the index child had been diagnosed by a physician with a list of infectious, autoimmune, or allergic conditions shown in Table 2 before the reference date (case’s HL diagnosis date). Parents who stated a positive history were then asked to supply the age (in months or years) at first episode. To allow for a latency period for HL development, we restricted our analysis to conditions diagnosed 1 year or more before the case’s HL diagnosis. For index children with ≥1 full or half siblings, parents were asked if the siblings had experienced any condition listed in Table 3 prior to the case’s HL diagnosis date (ncases=453, ncontrols=650). Mothers and fathers were each asked to indicate whether they had been diagnosed with the autoimmune or allergic conditions shown in Table 4 before the case’s HL diagnosis date. All medical conditions reported by parents were subsequently coded with the corresponding ICD-9 codes. In some instances, a grandparent or other relative completed a surrogate interview in the absence of a biological parent.

Table 2.

Association between a personal history of infectious, autoimmune, and allergic disease (diagnosed by a health professional >1 year prior to Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis, ascertained via maternal report) and childhood and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma overall and by EBV status*,

Combined cases EBV+ EBV−
Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI
Infectious diseases
Any infectious disease§ 679 474 1.69 0.98, 2.91 138 77 2.01 0.61, 6.57 327 254 3.41 1.36, 8.57
 None 62 24 Ref 19 5 Ref 31 7 Ref
Number of infectious diseases§
 0 62 24 Ref 19 5 Ref 31 7 Ref
 1-2 249 167 1.73 0.98, 3.07 50 25 1.86 0.51, 6.74 121 83 3.25 1.26, 8.37
 3-4 284 201 1.64 0.93, 2.89 57 35 2.03 0.60, 6.88 134 110 3.60 1.40, 9.28
 5+ 146 106 1.70 0.93, 3.11 31 17 2.17 0.56, 8.38 72 61 3.40 1.27, 9.07
P trend 0.29 0.34 0.31
Infectious mononucleosis 10 9 1.35 0.52, 3.50 1 3 9.10 0.81, 102.31 7 4 0.88 0.24, 3.26
 None 731 489 Ref 156 79 Ref 351 257 Ref
Strep or sore throat/Scarlet
fever/Tonsillitis
450 328 1.09 0.83, 1.42 81 54 2.19 1.06, 4.53 225 180 1.09 0.76, 1.56
 None 291 170 Ref 76 28 Ref 133 81 Ref
Chicken pox 336 249 1.14 0.88, 1.48 66 36 1.10 0.57, 2.12 169 128 0.97 0.67, 1.39
 None 405 249 Ref 91 46 Ref 189 133 Ref
Cold sores 35 30 0.93 0.53, 1.61 4 7 1.77 0.41, 7.57 19 11 0.67 0.30, 1.53
 None 706 468 Ref 153 75 Ref 339 250 Ref
Red measles 13 12 1.02 0.42, 2.45 2 1 0.98 0.05, 19.69 6 6 0.87 0.25, 3.01
 None 728 486 Ref 155 81 Ref 352 255 Ref
German measles 23 24 1.18 0.62, 2.27 5 4 1.41 0.30, 6.69 11 15 1.58 0.62, 4.03
 None 718 474 Ref 152 78 Ref 347 246 Ref
Roseola 78 41 0.77 0.51, 1.17 19 6 0.67 0.24, 1.83 39 24 0.85 0.49, 1.49
 None 663 457 Ref 138 76 Ref 319 237 Ref
Mumps 14 8 0.65 0.26, 1.60 1 2 2.96 0.20, 43.90 7 2 0.22 0.04, 1.14
 None 727 490 Ref 156 80 Ref 351 259 Ref
Ringworm/Athelete’s foot 49 39 1.09 0.67, 1.77 12 8 1.29 0.40, 4.20 21 20 1.17 0.58, 2.36
 None 692 459 Ref 145 74 Ref 337 241 Ref
Thrush 58 48 1.45 0.93, 2.23 13 9 1.48 0.55, 3.97 27 28 1.54 0.84, 2.80
 None 683 450 Ref 144 73 Ref 331 233 Ref
Macroparasites 46 45 1.32 0.83, 2.10 13 9 0.81 0.29, 2.26 20 21 1.45 0.70, 2.99
 None 695 453 Ref 144 73 Ref 338 240 Ref
Ear infections 502 345 1.17 0.89, 1.53 107 55 1.11 0.55, 2.25 231 192 1.50 1.02, 2.18
 None 239 153 Ref 50 27 Ref 127 69 Ref
Croup 104 55 0.88 0.59, 1.30 31 7 0.48 0.18, 1.26 44 39 1.35 0.81, 2.26
 None 637 443 Ref 126 75 Ref 314 222 Ref
Bronchiolitis/Bronchitis 183 109 0.89 0.66, 1.19 37 18 1.22 0.57, 2.63 90 63 0.93 0.63, 1.39
 None 558 389 Ref 120 64 Ref 268 198 Ref
Pneumonia 80 67 1.15 0.78, 1.70 16 10 0.88 0.30, 2.60 42 35 1.03 0.60, 1.78
 None 661 431 Ref 141 72 Ref 316 226 Ref
UTI 43 22 0.68 0.38, 1.21 9 3 0.23 0.04, 1.26 24 10 0.54 0.25, 1.21
 None 698 476 Ref 148 79 Ref 334 251 Ref
Impetigo 66 61 1.20 0.80, 1.80 15 12 1.51 0.62, 3.65 34 31 1.03 0.58, 1.84
 None 675 437 Ref 142 70 Ref 324 230 Ref
Other skin infections 29 26 1.35 0.75, 2.43 6 2 0.84 0.13, 5.35 15 19 1.76 0.83, 3.73
 None 712 472 Ref 151 80 Ref 343 242 Ref
Other infectious diseases 61 53 1.48 0.98, 2.25 16 13 1.76 0.71, 4.37 26 24 1.42 0.76, 2.65
 None 680 445 Ref 141 69 Ref 332 237 Ref
Autoimmune diseases
Any autoimmune disease 13 5 0.46 0.16, 1.38 3 2 1.85 0.19, 17.84 6 3 0.58 0.14, 2.41
 None 728 493 Ref 154 80 Ref 352 258 Ref
Allergic diseases
Any allergy 238 175 1.22 0.93, 1.59 51 22 0.95 0.48, 1.86 113 97 1.32 0.90, 1.94
 None 503 323 Ref 106 60 Ref 245 164 Ref
Number of allergies
 0 503 323 Ref 106 60 Ref 245 164 Ref
 1 142 104 1.23 0.89, 1.70 25 13 1.12 0.49, 2.57 69 62 1.50 0.96, 2.34
 2 63 43 1.09 0.69, 1.72 16 7 0.83 0.26, 2.65 30 22 1.01 0.53, 1.93
 3+ 33 28 1.38 0.79, 2.42 10 2 0.62 0.12, 3.24 14 13 1.21 0.53, 2.78
P trend 0.26 0.71 0.54
Asthma 82 58 1.20 0.81, 1.77 22 9 0.86 0.35, 2.14 42 29 0.98 0.57, 1.69
 None 659 440 Ref 135 73 Ref 316 232 Ref
Eczema 42 31 1.52 0.89, 2.62 9 2 0.88 0.15, 5.09 23 18 1.55 0.72, 3.34
 None 699 467 Ref 148 80 Ref 335 243 Ref
Hay fever 99 64 0.88 0.60, 1.30 20 8 0.57 0.19, 1.69 44 33 0.92 0.54, 1.59
 None 642 434 Ref 137 74 Ref 314 228 Ref
Hives 56 50 1.37 0.88, 2.14 13 7 2.23 0.72, 6.96 22 23 1.37 0.71, 2.68
 None 685 448 Ref 144 75 Ref 336 238 Ref
Contact dermatitis 26 21 1.05 0.54, 2.06 6 1 0.08 0.01, 1.55 11 13 1.23 0.49, 3.11
 None 715 477 Ref 151 81 Ref 347 248 Ref
Other allergy 73 55 1.12 0.75, 1.68 19 6 0.68 0.23, 2.04 35 32 1.11 0.63, 1.93
 None 668 443 Ref 138 76 Ref 323 229 Ref

CI = confidence interval ; EBV = Epstein-Barr virus; OR = odds ratio; UTI = urinary tract infection

*

Numbers in tables may not sum to total number of cases/controls due to missing values.

EBV status was not determined for 162 cases.

ORs adjusted for household income at birth, mother’s education, and birth order (considering full and half siblings).

§

Any infectious disease and number of infectious diseases include: tuberculosis, whooping cough, strep or sore throat/scarlet fever/tonsillitis, spinal meningitis, chicken pox, cold sores, red measles, German measles, roseola, hepatitis, mumps, infectious mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, ringworm/athelete’s foot, thrush, macroparasites, ear infections, rheumatic fever, croup, bronchiolitis/bronchitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), impetigo, other skin infections, other infectious diseases. Less than five cases reported the following individual infectious diseases asked about in the interview: tuberculosis (0 cases, 6 controls), whooping cough (3 cases, 7 controls), spinal meningitis (2 cases, 4 controls), hepatitis (3 cases, 0 controls), cytomegalovirus (0 cases, 0 controls), rheumatic fever (2 cases, 1 control).

Any autoimmune disease variable includes: arthritis or any other autoimmune condition indicated by parent. Less than five cases reported arthritis (2 cases, 6 controls), diabetes (1 case, 1 control), psoriasis (1 case, 5 controls), other autoimmune diseases (1 case, 1 control).

Any allergy and number of allergies variables include: asthma, eczema, hay fever, hives, contact dermatitis, other allergy.

Table 3.

Association between infectious, autoimmune, and allergic diseases in (full and half) siblings and childhood and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma overall and by EBV status*,

Combined cases EBV+ EBV−
Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI
Infectious diseases in siblings
Any infectious disease 615 441 2.04 1.01, 4.14 126 74 1.79 0.47, 6.83 307 234 1.70 0.60, 4.79
 None 35 12 Ref 10 4 Ref 14 6 Ref
Number of siblings with
infectious disease
 0 35 12 Ref 10 4 Ref 14 6 Ref
 1 - 2 517 337 1.89 0.93, 3.85 105 56 1.69 0.43, 6.68 256 177 1.61 0.57, 4.57
 3 - 4 81 84 3.45 1.52, 7.84 21 15 4.55 0.78, 26.55 38 45 2.75 0.83, 9.08
 5+ 17 20 4.49 1.42, 14.21 0 3 - - 13 12 2.59 0.62, 13.00
P trend 0.0006 0.02 0.11
Infectious mononucleosis 28 20 0.97 0.50, 1.88 10 5 0.91 0.24, 3.49 12 10 0.87 0.34, 2.25
 None 622 433 Ref 126 73 Ref 309 230 Ref
Whooping cough 12 11 1.51 0.61, 3.73 2 2 0.84 0.11, 6.38 6 5 1.33 0.35, 5.01
 None 638 442 Ref 134 76 Ref 315 235 Ref
Strep or sore throat/Scarlet
fever/Tonsillitis
502 346 0.94 0.69, 1.29 100 55 0.77 0.37, 1.60 256 188 0.92 0.59, 1.43
 None 148 107 Ref 36 23 Ref 65 52 Ref
Spinal meningitis 9 9 1.51 0.56, 4.09 2 1 0.55 0.04, 8.01 6 0 - -
 None 641 444 Ref 134 77 Ref 315 240 Ref
Chicken pox 504 366 1.20 0.87, 1.66 99 59 1.08 0.54, 2.19 251 202 1.45 0.90, 2.34
 None 146 87 Ref 37 19 Ref 70 38 Ref
Cold sores 86 71 1.15 0.80, 1.66 23 13 1.08 0.48, 2.46 33 38 1.57 0.93, 2.65
 None 564 382 Ref 113 65 Ref 288 202 Ref
Red measles 22 28 1.47 0.81, 2.67 2 6 3.22 0.57, 18.36 15 13 0.94 0.42, 2.07
 None 628 425 Ref 134 72 Ref 306 227 Ref
German measles 39 44 1.58 0.98, 2.54 10 9 2.69 0.86, 8.43 19 21 1.44 0.71, 2.92
 None 611 409 Ref 126 69 Ref 302 219 Ref
Roseola 73 60 1.28 0.86, 1.91 17 5 0.52 0.16, 1.67 40 41 1.42 0.85, 2.37
 None 577 393 Ref 119 73 Ref 281 199 Ref
Mumps 28 36 1.32 0.77, 2.26 2 6 5.72 0.92, 35.54 15 20 1.39 0.69, 2.81
 None 622 417 Ref 134 72 Ref 306 220 Ref
Ringworm/Athlete’s foot 76 86 1.50 1.04, 2.15 9 17 3.44 1.22, 9.64 41 45 1.29 0.78, 2.13
 None 574 367 Ref 127 61 Ref 280 195 Ref
Thrush 73 57 1.23 0.83, 1.84 17 13 2.88 1.06, 7.82 32 32 1.37 0.78, 2.43
 None 577 396 Ref 119 65 Ref 289 208 Ref
Macroparasites 52 39 1.03 0.64, 1.65 11 7 1.49 0.47, 2.67 28 17 0.70 0.35, 1.39
 None 598 414 Ref 125 71 Ref 293 223 Ref
Ear infections 431 324 1.39 1.04, 1.86 85 51 2.21 1.04, 4.69 213 182 1.52 1.02, 2.27
 None 219 129 Ref 51 27 Ref 108 58 Ref
Croup 90 64 1.02 0.69, 1.49 22 9 0.52 0.20, 1.36 45 35 0.90 0.53, 1.53
 None 560 389 Ref 114 69 Ref 276 205 Ref
Bronchiolitis/Bronchitis 175 139 1.22 0.91, 1.65 33 22 1.19 0.57, 2.53 89 82 1.34 0.89, 2.00
 None 475 314 Ref 103 56 Ref 232 158 Ref
Pneumonia 96 89 1.25 0.88, 1.78 20 15 0.86 0.37, 2.02 54 52 1.15 0.70, 1.88
 None 554 364 Ref 116 63 Ref 267 188 Ref
UTI 73 55 1.09 0.72, 1.64 16 8 1.26 0.46, 3.42 37 29 1.01 0.56, 1.83
 None 577 398 Ref 120 70 Ref 284 211 Ref
Impetigo 74 71 1.23 0.85, 1.78 17 11 1.12 0.46, 2.72 38 43 1.29 0.77, 2.15
 None 576 382 Ref 119 67 Ref 283 197 Ref
Other skin infections 16 12 1.07 0.46, 2.49 4 4 2.89 0.51, 16.37 8 5 0.99 0.30, 3.28
 None 634 441 Ref 132 74 Ref 313 235 Ref
Other infectious diseases 59 47 1.24 0.82, 1.88 14 7 0.95 0.32, 2.81 28 22 1.13 0.62, 2.06
 None 591 406 Ref 122 71 Ref 293 218 Ref
Autoimmune diseases in
siblings
Any autoimmune disease§ 16 8 0.59 0.24, 1.46 0 1 - - 7 5 0.74 0.21, 2.63
 None 634 445 Ref 136 77 Ref 314 235 Ref
Arthritis 7 5 1.00 0.29, 3.44 0 1 - - 4 2 0.64 0.11, 3.91
 None 643 448 Ref 136 77 Ref 317 238 Ref
Allergic diseases in siblings
Any allergy 246 197 1.21 0.93, 1.59 56 30 0.61 0.30, 1.24 116 116 1.62 1.11, 2.36
 None 404 256 Ref 80 48 Ref 205 124 Ref
Number of siblings with
allergies
 0 404 256 Ref 80 48 Ref 205 124 Ref
 1 181 146 1.18 0.87, 1.58 45 22 0.43 0.19, 0.98 86 90 1.72 1.14, 2.59
 2 53 39 1.24 0.75, 2.05 11 6 1.38 0.40, 4.72 24 18 1.10 0.52, 2.36
 3+ 12 12 1.86 0.76, 4.54 0 2 - - 6 8 2.22 0.69, 7.11
P trend 0.20 0.86 0.03
Asthma 87 72 1.27 0.89, 1.83 21 13 0.95 0.38, 2.41 43 41 1.39 0.86, 2.26
 None 563 381 Ref 115 65 Ref 278 199 Ref
Eczema 51 50 1.34 0.86, 2.09 11 7 1.15 0.39, 3.36 26 29 1.39 0.75, 2.58
 None 599 403 Ref 125 71 Ref 295 211 Ref
Hay fever 127 109 1.30 0.94, 1.78 26 18 1.14 0.51, 2.53 57 67 1.92 1.22, 3.03
 None 523 344 Ref 110 60 Ref 264 173 Ref
Hives 78 60 1.04 0.70, 1.53 13 8 1.55 0.55, 4.37 35 34 1.06 0.62, 1.81
 None 572 393 Ref 123 70 Ref 286 206 Ref
Contact dermatitis 26 14 0.80 0.39, 1.65 7 2 0.48 0.07, 3.08 10 8 1.31 0.44, 3.92
 None 624 439 Ref 129 76 Ref 311 232 Ref
Other allergy 54 40 1.24 0.77, 1.98 12 5 0.63 0.18, 2.20 23 32 2.39 1.25, 4.55
 None 596 413 Ref 124 73 Ref 298 208 Ref

CI = confidence interval ; OR = odds ratio; UTI = urinary tract infection

*

Numbers in tables may not sum to total number of cases/controls due to missing values.

ORs adjusted for household income at birth, mother’s education, and number of (full and half) siblings

Any infectious disease and number of siblings with infectious disease include: tuberculosis, whooping cough, strep or sore throat/scarlet fever/tonsillitis, spinal meningitis, chicken pox, cold sores, red measles, German measles, roseola, hepatitis, mumps, infectious mononucleosis, cytomegalovirus, ringworm/athelete’s foot, thrush, macroparasites, ear infections, rheumatic fever, croup, bronchiolitis/bronchitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection (UTI), impetigo, other skin infections, other infectious diseases. Less than five cases had one or more siblings with the individual infectious diseases: tuberculosis (1 case, 4 controls), hepatitis (2 cases, 3 controls), cytomegalovirus (1 case, 0 controls), rheumatic fever (1 case, 2 controls).

§

Any autoimmune disease variable includes: arthritis, diabetes, or any other autoimmune condition indicated by parent. Less than five cases had one or more siblings with diabetes (2 cases, 3 controls), psoriasis (0 cases, 4 controls), other autoimmune diseases (1 case, 3 controls).

Any allergy and number of allergies variables include: asthma, eczema, hay fever, hives, contact dermatitis, other allergy.

Table 4.

Association between a parental history of autoimmune and allergic disease and childhood and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma overall and by EBV status*,

Combined cases EBV+ EBV−
Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI Ncontrols Ncases OR 95% CI
Autoimmune diseases in
parents
Any autoimmune disease 153 122 1.17 0.87, 1.58 23 23 2.97 1.34, 6.58 83 61 0.88 0.58, 1.35
 None 587 376 Ref 133 59 Ref 275 200 Ref
Arthritis 88 67 1.05 0.72, 1.54 9 14 7.79 2.37, 25.63 45 33 0.82 0.48, 1.41
 None 652 431 Ref 147 68 Ref 313 228 Ref
Diabetes§ 27 24 1.35 0.73, 2.50 3 5 5.40 0.82, 35.44 18 12 0.86 0.38, 1.96
 None 713 474 Ref 153 77 Ref 340 249 Ref
Psoriasis 40 29 1.15 0.65, 2.02 9 6 1.29 0.35, 4.76 23 12 0.71 0.31, 1.65
 None 700 469 Ref 147 76 Ref 335 249 Ref
Other autoimmune 4 10 2.75 0.73, 10.41 1 0 - - 2 9 5.64 1.09, 29.17
 None 736 488 Ref 155 82 Ref 356 252 Ref
Allergic diseases in parents
Any allergy 426 287 1.14 0.88, 1.48 84 44 1.00 0.51, 1.96 201 163 1.47 1.01, 2.14
 None 314 211 Ref 72 38 Ref 157 98 Ref
Number of allergies
 0 314 211 Ref 72 38 Ref 157 98 Ref
 1 210 133 1.00 0.73, 1.36 38 18 0.86 0.38, 1.96 102 71 1.19 0.77, 1.85
 2 124 96 1.44 1.01, 2.06 28 14 0.99 0.37, 2.68 55 56 1.94 1.18, 3.18
 3+ 92 58 1.08 0.71, 1.65 18 12 1.50 0.50, 4.54 44 36 1.60 0.88, 2.91
P trend 0.22 0.77 0.02
Asthma 103 72 1.21 0.85, 1.73 20 16 2.26 0.90, 5.66 46 40 1.38 0.84, 2.29
 None 637 426 Ref 136 66 Ref 312 221 Ref
Eczema 74 55 1.14 0.75, 1.74 18 7 0.65 0.21, 1.99 30 35 1.75 0.94, 3.26
 None 666 443 Ref 138 75 Ref 328 226 Ref
Hay fever 265 179 1.18 0.91, 1.54 50 30 1.47 0.74, 2.90 126 95 1.19 0.83, 1.72
 None 475 319 Ref 106 52 Ref 232 166 Ref
Hives 170 124 1.18 0.88, 1.58 32 23 1.32 0.62, 2.80 85 74 1.39 0.92, 2.10
 None 570 374 Ref 124 59 Ref 273 187 Ref
Contact dermatitis 50 30 0.81 0.48, 1.37 12 3 0.33 0.07, 1.49 23 19 0.98 0.50, 1.94
 None 690 468 Ref 144 79 Ref 335 242 Ref
Other allergy 94 61 1.04 0.70, 1.54 20 9 0.88 0.26, 2.92 46 41 1.41 0.84, 2.38
 None 646 437 Ref 136 73 Ref 312 220 Ref

OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval

*

Numbers in tables may not sum to total number of cases/controls due to missing values.

ORs adjusted for household income at birth, maternal age at the child’s birth, mother’s education, and birth order of index child (considering full and half siblings)

Any autoimmune disease variable includes: arthritis, Crohn’s disease, diabetes, lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, Myasthenia Gravis, psoriasis, scleroderma, other autoimmune disease. Less than five cases had one or more parents with the autoimmune conditions: Crohn’s disease (2 cases, 6 controls), lupus erythematosus (2 cases, 3 controls), multiple sclerosis (0 cases, 1 control), Myasthenia Gravis (1 case, 1 control), pernicious anemia (2 cases, 1 control), scleroderma (0 cases, 0 controls),.

§

Includes both type I and type II diabetes; information regarding type was not requested in the questionnaire.

Any allergy and number of allergies variables include: asthma, eczema, hay fever, hives, contact dermatitis, other allergy.

Tumor Epstein-Barr virus detection

Case parents were asked to provide consent for the release of their child’s formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimen for EBV typing; these were requested from the treating CCG/COG institutions. Tumors were available for 355 cases. There were no differences in tumor availability by age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, or other factors related to SES (maternal age, maternal education, household income); however, there were proportionally more NS and fewer “other” cases with tumors available.

Tumor EBV status was determined by detection of EBER-1 and EBER-2 via a standard digoxigenin-based in situ hybridization technique.21 HL specimens known to be EBV+ and B95-8 cells served as positive controls, while EBER sense probes served as negative controls. U6 probes were used to verify that RNA had been preserved in all tumor specimens.

Statistical Analysis

Conditional logistic regression (PROC PHREG, SAS Enterprise Guide version 5.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used to quantify associations between infectious, autoimmune and allergic diseases and HL overall, and by tumor EBV status (EBV+, EBV−), HL subtype (NS, MC, lymphocyte predominant, LP), and age group (0-9 years, 10-14 years) analyzed separately; odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Analyses restricted to NS and MC HL (i.e., classical HL) yielded nearly identical results to those for HL overall; thus all HL cases were retained in the final multivariate models. The individual infectious, autoimmune, and atopic conditions were primarily coded as dichotomous variables (i.e., present vs. absent). In addition, the total number of infections and allergic diseases in the index children, the total number of siblings with ≥1 infections and allergic diseases, and the number of allergic diseases in parents were each summed to evaluate dose response, where sums were represented as ordinal variables in regression models and P-values for linear trend were obtained. We selected a priori variables that are known to correlate with immune system development and exposure to infections, including birth order, number of siblings, breastfed (ever vs. never), household income, and maternal educational attainment, smoking, and age at the index child’s birth, to evaluate as potential confounders. Variables that altered the ln(OR) by ≥10% were retained in final multivariate models. The Wald chi-square test was used to test the null hypothesis that subgroup-specific ORs were equivalent, producing P-values for interaction.

Sensitivity analyses in specific patient subgroups were also conducted in the manner described above, including an analysis of infections in the first year of life in cases diagnosed with HL at >2 years of age and infections in cases with ≥1 older siblings. We also examined the robustness of the results with respect to the person interviewed (i.e., biological mother, biological father, surrogate).

Considering the more common conditions queried, minimal detectable ORs were estimated using Quanto version 1.2.4,22 given the sample sizes of 517 case-control pairs overall (and 84 EBV+ and 271 EBV− pairs), a type I error rate of 0.05, 80% power, and assuming observed control exposure prevalences between 5-90% are representative of the underlying target population.

Protection of Human Subjects

The study was approved by Institutional Review Boards at the University of Minnesota, the University of Pittsburgh and the University of New Mexico (the original coordinating centers), and participating CCG/COG institutions.

Results

Response rates and subject characteristics

A total of 646 potentially eligible HL cases were identified at 117 CCG/COG institutions throughout North America. Interviews were completed for 517 cases (80%), including 324 cases with NS HL, 86 cases with MC HL, and 60 cases with LP HL. An additional 68 cases (11%) were excluded from analysis because there was no matched control enrolled and 1 case was found to be age-ineligible (0.2%). The remaining subjects did not complete interviews due to parental refusal (4%), inability to locate families (3%), and physician refusal (2%). Biological mothers completed maternal interviews for 451 cases, while biological fathers (9) or other willing first degree relatives (57) completed surrogate interviews for the remainder. Similarly, biological fathers completed paternal interviews for the majority of cases (329), and mothers (95) or other relatives (93) responded when the father was unavailable.

At last tally, 207,438 telephone calls to 88,429 telephone numbers were made to select controls. Of the 88,429 numbers, 50,258 were non-residential, 2,822 refused to provide a household census or hung up, and 360 were ineligible. Of the 34,991 providing a census (RDD screening response rate=91.7%), 25,100 had no resident children, 8,682 had children who did not match, and 1,209 had a matching child (136 were matched via the relaxed criteria). Of the 1,209 matches, 784 (64.8%) were interviewed and included in the study, while 323 (26.7%) actively refused participation, 101 (8.4%) were passive refusals, and 1 (0.1%) was ineligible.

As shown in Table 1, cases and controls had comparable distributions of the matching variables sex and race/ethnicity, while there was a greater proportion of younger controls as prescribed by the matching scheme. Cases and controls were similar with respect to birth order, however, the distributions of sibship, breastfeeding, maternal age, maternal educational attainment, and household income were lower in cases than in controls. With respect to the tumor analysis, 16.3% were found to have EBV RNAs present, with 22.7% EBV+ in the 0-4 year age group, 29.5% in the 5-9 group and 11.5% in the 10-14 group, while 52.4% had no evidence of EBV involvement, and 31.3% were not examined. The distribution of cases by diagnosis age, HL subtype, and tumor EBV status is shown in Supplementary Table 1. Importantly, the cases with determined tumor EBV status included a higher percentage of NS HL and a lower percentage of cases with “other” histologic subtypes compared with cases with undetermined EBV status; however, no differences were observed across categories of age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, maternal age, maternal education, or household income.

Table 1.

Selected descriptive characteristics of 517 childhood and adolescent Hodgkin lymphoma cases and 784 matched controls.*

Controls
N (%)
Cases
N (%)
Unadjusted OR 95% CI Ptrend
Gender
 Male 518 (66.1) 320 (61.9)
 Female 266 (33.9) 197 (38.1)
Age at diagnosis (years)
 0-4 97 (12.4) 22 (4.3)
 5-9 302 (38.5) 122 (23.6)
 10-14 326 (41.6) 373 (72.2)
 15+ 59 (7.5)
Race/ethnicity
 White 631 (80.5) 386 (74.7)
 African-American 67 (8.6) 54 (10.4)
 Hispanic 78 (10.0) 62 (12.0)
 Other 8 (1.0) 15 (2.9)
Birth order
 First 307 (39.7) 206 (40.2) Ref 0.25
 Second 274 (35.5) 161 (31.5) 0.90 0.69, 1.18
 Third or higher 192 (24.8) 145 (28.3) 1.22 0.91, 1.63
Sibship
 0 67 (8.6) 28 (5.4) Ref 0.04
 1-2 533 (68.0) 339 (65.6) 1.32 0.82, 2.12
 3+ 184 (23.5) 150 (29.0) 1.62 0.97, 2.71
Breastfed
 Yes 496 (63.3) 263 (50.1) 0.62 0.48, 0.79
 No 288 (36.7) 254 (49.1) Ref
Maternal age at child’s birth (years)
 <25 318 (40.6) 248 (48.1) Ref 0.04
 25-29 271 (34.6) 165 (32.0) 0.82 0.63, 1.07
 ≥30 194 (24.8) 103 (20.0) 0.74 0.54, 1.01
Maternal educational attainment
 Some high school 65 (8.3) 73 (14.2) Ref 0.0001
 High school graduate 248 (31.8) 175 (34.0) 0.55 0.36, 0.83
 Beyond high school 468 (60.0) 267 (51.9) 0.44 0.29, 0.66
Household income at child’s birth
 0 - $19,999 268 (35.6) 243 (48.4) Ref <0.0001
 $20,000 - $39,999 333 (44.2) 206 (41.0) 0.70 0.53, 0.92
 $40,000+ 152 (20.2) 53 (10.6) 0.42 0.28, 0.63

OR = odds ratio; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval

*

Numbers in tables may not sum to total number of cases/controls due to missing values.

Cases and controls were matched on gender, race/ethnicity, and age; ORs were not calculated for matching variables.

Birth order and sibship are based on full and half full siblings. Birth order could not be determined for those with missing sibling birthdates (5 cases, 11 controls).

Infections

Overall, case parents were more likely than control parents to report a physician diagnosis of one or more infections in the index child >1 year prior to the reference date (OR=1.69, 95% CI: 0.98-2.91), however, there was no evidence for increasing risk with increasing number of infectious episodes and no significant associations were observed for the individual infections queried (Table 2). Stronger positive associations were observed for EBV+ (OR=2.01, 95% CI: 0.61-6.57) and EBV− HL (OR=3.41, 95% CI: 1.36-8.57) examined separately. Although none of the ORs reached statistical significance, previous exposure to any infectious diseases was positively associated with the NS and MC HL subtypes, while an inverse OR was observed for LP HL (Supplementary Table 2). Additional stratification by EBV status indicated a strong positive association for EBV− NS HL (OR=3.43, 95% CI: 1.22-9.62; Supplementary Table 3). The increased risk of HL associated with infections (OR=2.41, 95% CI: 1.05-5.52) was more pronounced in the 0-9 year age group, although the OR was not statistically significantly different from that in 10-14-year-olds (Pinteraction=0.31; Supplementary Table 4).

The most frequently reported infections of childhood followed the expected pattern and included: ear infections (69% cases, 68% controls); strep or sore throat, scarlet fever, or tonsillitis (66% cases, 61% controls); and chicken pox (50% cases, 45% controls). A variety of “other infections” were also specified (11% cases, 8% controls), however, associations were nearly identical after removal of this category from the overall “any infection” summary variable in index children and siblings (data not shown) indicating the overall association was not attributed to the report of other infections.

Few parents recalled a physician diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis (IM) in the index children (9 cases, 10 controls), yielding a nonsignificant overall OR for HL of 1.35 (95% CI: 0.52-3.50). A non-statistically significant 9.1-fold increased odds of HL was observed for IM in EBV+ cases only (95% CI: 0.81-102.31; Table 2), although based on only 3 exposed cases and 1 exposed control. A positive association was also observed between strep or sore throat, scarlet fever, or tonsillitis and HL for EBV+ cases (OR=2.19, 95% CI: 1.06-4.53) that was not observed for EBV− cases (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 0.76-1.56, Pinteraction=0.09). Significant associations with the combined sore throat variable and chicken pox were similarly observed in the younger children 0-9 years (Supplementary Table 4).

In sensitivity analyses, the overall association with one or more infections did not persist upon examination of only those infections occurring within the first year of life among cases diagnosed at ≥2 years compared with their matched controls (OR=1.18, 95% CI: 0.92-1.50) or upon restriction to the 139 cases and 179 controls with 1 or more older siblings (OR = 2.29, 95% CI: 0.34-15.46; data not shown).

After adjusting for household income at birth, mother’s educational attainment, and number of (full and half) siblings, case siblings were also more likely to have had an infection preceding HL diagnosis (OR=2.04, 95% CI: 1.01-4.14; Table 3) with an increasing risk for HL observed with increasing number of affected siblings (Ptrend=0.0006). There was no pattern with regard to EBV status and HL subtype, however (Table 3 and Supplementary Table 3). In examining specific infections, case siblings had experienced ear infections (overall, EBV+, EBV−), ringworm or athlete’s foot (overall and EBV+), and thrush (EBV+) in greater proportions than had control siblings (Table 3).

Autoimmune diseases

Parents reported few autoimmune conditions in index children (5 cases, 13 controls) or their siblings (8 cases, 16 controls) (Tables 2-3, Supplementary Tables 2-4). With respect to affected parents, there was no association observed for HL overall, however, parental history of any autoimmune condition (OR=2.97, 95% CI: 1.34-6.58) or arthritis (OR=7.79, 95% CI: 2.37-25.63) appeared to increase risk of EBV+ HL in offspring, while no association was observed in EBV− cases (Pinteraction=0.008 and Pinteraction=0.0007, respectively). Risk was particularly increased for EBV+ NS HL (OR=10.14, 95% CI: 2.18-47.22; Supplementary Table 3).

Allergic diseases

In the index children, allergic diseases diagnosed by a physician >1 year prior to HL were not associated with HL overall (OR=1.22, 95% CI: 0.93-1.59) or by EBV status (Table 2). One or more allergic conditions was associated with HL in children 0-9 years (OR=1.63, 95% CI: 1.00-2.66; Supplementary Table 4), but not in older children (OR10-14 years=1.06, 95% CI: 0.71-1.57); these ORs were not statistically significantly different, however (Pinteraction=0.18). Similarly, there were no associations for allergic diseases in siblings or parents for HL overall. However, having a sibling (OR=1.62, 95% CI: 1.11-2.36) or parent (OR=1.47, 95% CI: 1.01-2.14) with one or more allergic conditions was positively associated with EBV− HL (Tables 3 and 4). With respect to histologic subtypes, associations were observed in EBV− NS HL cases for sibling allergic history (OR=1.75, 95% CI: 1.11-2.76; Supplementary Table 3) and for EBV− MC HL in parental allergic history (OR=21.91, 95% CI: 1.15-416.55). For specific allergic conditions, positive associations were observed between a sibling history of hay fever and other allergies, respectively, and EBV− HL (Table 3).

Discussion

In the largest case-control study of risk factors for childhood and adolescent HL conducted to date, a history of infections in the index children was positively associated with HL overall, EBV+ and EBV− HL, NS and MC HL, and HL diagnosed at ages 0-9 years, although not all of the associations achieved statistical significance. Infections in siblings also associated positively with HL. While these findings offer some support for an infectious etiology for HL in childhood and early adolescence, the overall associations were not attributed to any particular pathogen(s). Additionally, a family history of conditions signifying immune dysregulation was found to vary by tumor EBV status. Specifically, we report for the first time that a parental history of autoimmune diseases was strongly associated with increased EBV+ HL risk, while having a parent or sibling with an allergic disease was associated with EBV− HL.

The summary variables of “any infections” and “number of infections” are non-specific markers that may reveal an underlying susceptibility to infections, a particularly infectious childhood environment, or a combination of these. In addition, the summary variables may represent more severe infections, since these may have been recalled by parents with greater frequency, while milder infections may have been forgotten. In our study, most case (95.2%) and control (91.6%) parents reported one or more infectious diagnoses at least 1 year before the case’s HL diagnosis. Validation studies have shown that the accuracy of parental recall of prior infectious episodes is generally modest in comparison to medical records,23-25 with more recent infections remembered marginally better than lifetime history and with mothers remembering somewhat better than fathers.24 Overall, the positive predictive value for maternal recall of any infection was found high among both cases (88.9%) and controls (86.5%), although case mothers showed slightly better recall.23 We compared the ORs for all respondents to those generated from responses by biological mothers only (Ncases=451, Ncontrols=721) and found very similar or identical results for infections, autoimmune diseases, and allergies among index children and their siblings. Notably, recall has been shown to be more accurate for some infections (e.g., κ=0.8 for recall of meningitis compared to medical records) than for others (e.g., κ=0.1 for gastro-intestinal and respiratory tract infections, respectively),25 but does not vary substantially by demographics.24 Here, few associations were observed for the specific infectious pathogens we queried, either overall or among subgroups. It is unclear, therefore, if the overall associations are due to a general susceptibility to infection, if specific infectious agents are involved in HL development in EBV− cases, or if the observed associations are an artifact due to differential recall.

It is further possible that the associations may be attributable to reverse causation, where the process of lymphoma development has enhanced the host susceptibility to infection. We included a 1-year latency period in our analysis to minimize this concern, however, the pathogenesis of HL in children may have a longer latency period. Newton et al. found that compared with healthy controls, older adolescents and adults had significantly more visits to their general practitioners for infections beginning 10 years prior to HL diagnosis and the number of visits increased monotonically as the HL diagnosis neared; no specific infectious agents were implicated, however.26

In our study, 41% of cases <10 years with known tumor EBV status were EBV+, which is concordant with the ~50% expected, while the percentage of EBV+ tumors among the children 10-14 years (17%) was lower than expected. As mentioned above, there were proportionately more NS HL cases represented in the available tumor set than in the total case set; since NS tumors are less often EBV+,4 this may have contributed to the lower than expected percentage of EBV+ tumors observed. Given that specimens were unavailable for 1/3 of participants, it is possible that a majority of the tumors with unknown EBV status were positive, or participants in the current study may have been less often EBV+ by chance. For the ~50% of pediatric HL that are EBV−, earlier efforts to identify responsible pathogenic causes were generally uninformative, despite investigations of several putative infectious agents (reviewed in 27). Notably, human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) infection was not consistently identified in tumor tissue from childhood cases,28,29 however, HHV-6 may merit another look given that Siddon et al. recently published strong data supporting HHV-6 infection in HRS cells in adult NS HL specimens.30

Few studies have examined history of infections as a risk factor for pediatric HL.31-33 Our results are consistent with those by Goldin et al., who found a nonsignificant 1.61-fold increased risk for HL at ages 2-14 years in children hospitalized for infections in the first year of life (95% CI: 0.79-3.31).31 In contrast, Rudant et al. examined parental report of several immune-mediating factors in a population-based case-control study in France, and found an inverse association for repeated early common infections overall (OR=0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9) and across each of the HL subtypes, although small numbers precluded statistical significance in the latter.32 Finally, Michos et al. did not find evidence for an association for seroprevalence for 9 common infectious pathogens at the time of HL diagnosis in 52 childhood cases and their matched controls,33 however, their cross-sectional study design did not allow for proper temporality and a latency period between infection and lymphomagenesis.

An increased risk of childhood/adolescent HL associated with greater exposure to childhood infections is consistent with the observed elevated risk with increasing sibship size, a surrogate measure of exposure to infections in childhood, both in our study (Ptrend=0.04, Table 1) and in a population-based study in Denmark (ORper sibling=1.28, 95% CI: 1.00-1.63),7 although this association has not been replicated in all studies.34 Together, these results may suggest an immune-mediated pathogenic effect of infection or may be an indicator of underlying immune dysregulation. Conversely, studies of AYA HL have generally shown an opposing pattern: both exposure to childhood infections35 and increased sibship size7 have been associated with reduced HL risk. This pattern in AYA HL is hypothesized to be due to delayed exposure followed by an aberrant response to an infectious pathogen.8 Of note, infection with EBV accounts for a smaller proportion of AYA than childhood cases,4 suggesting involvement of other infectious agents.

Given the known link between a personal history of rheumatoid arthritis and HL in adult patients,15 as well as observed associations with systemic lupus erythematosus, sarcoidosis, Sjogren’s syndrome, Hashimoto thyroiditis, and localized scleroderma,16,17 we expected a similar association for autoimmune diseases and childhood/adolescent HL. This hypothesis is further supported by reports describing increased rates of HL in offspring of rheumatoid arthritis patients.36 With respect to personal history of autoimmunity, a registry-based study in Denmark did not detect increased childhood HL risk (i.e., there were no cancer diagnoses among the 188 children with autoimmune diseases).37 Although a nonsignificant inverse association was reported in the current study, the rarity of autoimmune conditions hampered interpretation.

With respect to family history, neither the same registry-based study in Denmark37 nor one from Sweden38 found evidence for an association between parental autoimmune disease and offspring HL (standardized incidence ratios were 1.3 (95% CI:0.6-2.5) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.61-1.28), respectively), however, the number of affected children in each study was modest (nDenmark=8 HL cases, nSweden=31 HL cases). In the current study, there were substantially more autoimmune diseases in parents (122 cases and 153 controls), with no evidence for associations for HL overall. Interestingly, however, positive associations for any autoimmune conditions and arthritis were observed for EBV+ HL only. Parents indicating a history of arthritis were asked to further specify arthritis type. Parental rheumatoid arthritis (9 cases, 14 controls) was not significantly associated with offspring HL overall, but was positively associated with EBV+ HL (affecting parents of 3 cases and 0 controls; OR could not be calculated) and inversely associated with EBV− HL (OR=0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.93; Pinteraction could not be calculated; data not shown). Due to the serious nature of autoimmune diseases, parents would be expected to recall a diagnosis in themselves or their children with high accuracy,24 thus minimizing concerns about recall bias. It is not known whether the increased risks can be ascribed to shared genetic or epigenetic factors, or if both sets of conditions could arise as rare responses to infections.37 A comprehensive family-based study design that includes medical record review and biomarker analysis could help address these questions.

Although inverse associations have been observed for other pediatric B-cell lineage hematologic malignancies, including any allergic disease, asthma, eczema, and hay fever and childhood ALL,39 and allergic diseases or asthma and childhood and adolescent NHL,32,40 our results are consistent with those from two smaller studies that did not find associations for pediatric HL with allergic diseases, asthma, or eczema examined separately.32,40 Results from case-control studies in adults have been less consistent, with no association found for HL in three studies,41-43 reduced HL risk reported for prevalent hay fever (OR=0.5, 95% CI:0.3-0.8)44 and previous hospitalization for asthma (OR=0.6, 95% CI: 0.4-0.9),45 and increased HL risk observed for those reporting a history of eczema (OR=4.2, 95% CI: 1.2-14.8).46 The association of allergic history in siblings and parents with EBV− HL in our study is a new finding that would also benefit from further family- or registry-based studies, particularly since the association with parental allergic history was attenuated upon exclusion of surrogate interviews.

Parents were asked to recall physician-diagnosed allergies, which may result in misclassification due to failure to recognize allergy symptoms, changes in allergic symptoms over time (possibly in relation to HL development), or other reasons.39 Indeed, a comparison of control prevalences for asthma (11.1%) and hay fever (13.4%) in our study to national rates for children 0-17 years (11.4% and 17.5%, respectively) during the period 1997-199947 suggested high parental reporting rates for asthma, but potential underreporting of hay fever. These results align with validation studies, in which parental report of allergy history was compared to medical records, indicating higher parental recollection of asthma and lower recall of eczema;24,48 similar recall was noted for the individual allergic conditions across cases and controls, however.48 The failure to detect consistent associations in this and other studies of childhood and adult HL despite observations of elevated IgE levels in serum and detectable IgE in HRS cells49 implies either that there is no association and the excess IgE is produced as a result of the lymphoma, or that the association is modest or relevant only for a subgroup of cases.

Three other limitations are worthy of mention. First, we did not adjust for multiple comparisons, however we acknowledge that ORs with P-values near the 0.05 significance level may be spurious. Second, selection bias may be a limitation, since control families had higher distributions of maternal educational attainment and annual household income in the year of the child’s birth. Because factors related to SES have been associated with pediatric/adolescent HL,8 we have adjusted for measured SES-related factors (maternal educational attainment and annual household income) herein, although residual confounding by SES may remain. Third, North American children are routinely vaccinated for infectious diseases. In the interviews, parents reported high immunization rates for whooping cough, mumps, or rubella for cases (range: 91-96%) and controls (86-93%), although parents of controls had somewhat lower recall (7-9% did not know if their child had received immunizations vs. 4-6% of case parents). The fact that most children were immunized means that they were less likely to have contracted these diseases, thereby lowering statistical power to detect an association. This should not have introduced bias into the study, however, since vaccinations were provided nondifferentially to cases and controls (all P≥0.07).

Strengths include study size, with enrollment of a considerable proportion of North American HL cases diagnosed during the period 1989-2003 through CCG/COG institutions. Our current analysis is also the first to consider epidemiologic data for childhood HL by tumor EBV status, which was advantageous given the new insights revealed upon stratification by EBV status. Because there was ≥80% statistical power to detect ORs of ≥1.5-1.7 for conditions with prevalences of 10-80% and ≥2 for conditions with prevalences of 5 and 90% for the entire study population, and corresponding ORs of ≥1.7-2.1 and ≥2.5-2.7, respectively, for EBV− cases, we can likely rule out large associations. Nonetheless, our method required parents to recall health histories over several years.

Considering the limitations in using history data collected from parental report or medical records, future studies should examine biomarkers to better characterize the role of infections and immune dysregulation preceding a diagnosis of pediatric HL, such as the application of next generation sequencing to the identification of known and novel viruses in pre-diagnostic serum or tumor specimens.50 Further, in view of the documented familial aggregation of HL6 and the observed associations with family history of autoimmune and allergic conditions that are specific to EBV+ and EBV− tumors, respectively, family-based studies may provide a powerful tool for identifying genetic risk factors and exposures shared among affected family members.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Novelty and impact of the research:

We present data from the largest etiologic study devoted to understanding the causes of pediatric/adolescent HL. Our results support the hypothesis of an infectious etiology for HL, both in the presence and absence of tumor EBV, although no specific infectious agents were implicated. Moreover, distinct patterns between family history of autoimmunity and allergy and HL risk by EBV status emphasize the need for comprehensive family-based studies.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Miriam R. Hixon for her outstanding contributions, including conducting the telephone interviews and coding the data.

Funding: Research supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 CA047473, K05 CA157439, U10CA13539, U10CA98543, and the Children’s Cancer Research Fund, Minneapolis, MN.

Abbreviations

AYA

Adolescent and young adult

CCG

Children’s Cancer Group

CI

Confidence interval

COG

Children’s Oncology Group

EBER

Epstein-Barr virus-encoded small RNA

EBV

Epstein-Barr virus

HHV-6

Human herpesvirus 6

HL

Hodgkin lymphoma

HRS

Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg

IgE

Immunoglobulin E

IM

Infectious mononucleosis

LMP1

Latent membrane protein 1

LP

Lymphocyte predominant

MC

Mixed cellularity

NS

Nodular sclerosis

OR

Odds ratio

RDD

Random digit dialing

SES

Socio-economic status

Th1

Type 1 helper T cells

Th2

Type 2 helper T cells

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest regarding this research.

References

  • 1.Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program . SEER*Stat Database: Incidence - SEER 13 Regs Research Data, Nov 2011 Sub, Vintage 2009 Pops (1992-2009) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment> - Linked To County Attributes - Total U.S., 1969-2010 Counties. National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program; [Accessed November 20, 2012]. www.seer.cancer.gov. Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2012, based on the November 2011 submission. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Filipovich AH, Heinitz KJ, Robison LL, Frizzera G. The Immunodeficiency Cancer Registry. A research resource. Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1987;9:183–4. doi: 10.1097/00043426-198722000-00017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Biggar RJ, Frisch M, Goedert JJ, AIDS-Cancer Match Registry Study Group Risk of cancer in children with AIDS. JAMA. 2000;284:205–9. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.2.205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Glaser SL, Lin RJ, Stewart SL, Ambinder RF, Jarrett RF, Brousset P, Pallesen G, Gulley ML, Khan G, O’Grady J, Hummel M, Preciado MV, et al. Epstein-Barr virus-associated Hodgkin’s disease: epidemiologic characteristics in international data. Int J Cancer. 1997;70:375–82. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970207)70:4<375::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Armstrong AA, Alexander FE, Cartwright R, Angus B, Krajewski AS, Wright DH, Brown I, Lee F, Kane E, Jarrett RF. Epstein-Barr virus and Hodgkin’s disease: further evidence for the three disease hypothesis. Leukemia. 1998;12:1272–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2401097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Crump C, Sundquist K, Sieh W, Winkleby MA, Sundquist J. Perinatal and Family Risk Factors for Hodgkin Lymphoma in Childhood Through Young Adulthood. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;176:1147–58. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Westergaard T, Melbye M, Pedersen JB, Frisch M, Olsen JH, Andersen PK. Birth order, sibship size and risk of Hodgkin’s disease in children and young adults: a population-based study of 31 million person-years. Int J Cancer. 1997;72:977–81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19970917)72:6<977::aid-ijc10>3.0.co;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gutensohn NM, Shapiro DS. Social class risk factors among children with Hodgkin’s disease. Int J Cancer. 1982;30:433–5. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910300409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gutensohn N, Cole P. Childhood social environment and Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:135–40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198101153040302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mueller N, Evans A, Harris NL, Comstock GW, Jellum E, Magnus K, Orentreich N, Polk BF, Vogelman J. Hodgkin’s disease and Epstein-Barr virus. Altered antibody pattern before diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:689–95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198903163201103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Weiss LM, Movahed LA, Warnke RA, Sklar J. Detection of Epstein-Barr viral genomes in Reed-Sternberg cells of Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:502–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198902233200806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bechtel D, Kurth J, Unkel C, Kuppers R. Transformation of BCR-deficient germinal-center B cells by EBV supports a major role of the virus in the pathogenesis of Hodgkin and posttransplantation lymphomas. Blood. 2005;106:4345–50. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-06-2342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hesse J, Ibsen KK, Krabbe S, Uldall P. Prevalence of antibodies to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in childhood and adolescence in Denmark. Scand J Infect Dis. 1983;15:335–8. doi: 10.3109/inf.1983.15.issue-4.03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Poppema S. Immunobiology and pathophysiology of Hodgkin lymphomas. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2005:231–8. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2005.1.231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Smitten AL, Simon TA, Hochberg MC, Suissa S. A meta-analysis of the incidence of malignancy in adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10:R45. doi: 10.1186/ar2404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kristinsson SY, Landgren O, Sjoberg J, Turesson I, Bjorkholm M, Goldin LR. Autoimmunity and risk for Hodgkin’s lymphoma by subtype. Haematologica. 2009;94:1468–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.010512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Anderson LA, Gadalla S, Morton LM, Landgren O, Pfeiffer R, Warren JL, Berndt SI, Ricker W, Parsons R, Engels EA. Population-based study of autoimmune conditions and the risk of specific lymphoid malignancies. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:398–405. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Urayama KY, Jarrett RF, Hjalgrim H, Diepstra A, Kamatani Y, Chabrier A, Gaborieau V, Boland A, Nieters A, Becker N, Foretova L, Benavente Y, et al. Genome-wide association study of classical Hodgkin lymphoma and Epstein-Barr virus status-defined subgroups. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:240–53. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang X, Kushekhar K, Nolte I, Kooistra W, Visser L, Bouwman I, Kouprie N, Veenstra R, van Imhoff G, Olver B, Houlston RS, Poppema S, et al. HLA associations in classical Hodgkin lymphoma: EBV status matters. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39986. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Grufferman S, Delzell E, Delong ER. An approach to conducting epidemiologic research within cooperative clinical trials groups. J Clin Oncol. 1984;2:670–5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.6.670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ambinder RF, Browning PJ, Lorenzana I, Leventhal BG, Cosenza H, Mann RB, MacMahon EM, Medina R, Cardona V, Grufferman S, et al. Epstein-Barr virus and childhood Hodgkin’s disease in Honduras and the United States. Blood. 1993;81:462–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gauderman WJ, Morrison JM. QUANTO 1.1: A computer program for power and sample size calculations for genetic-epidemiology studies. 2006 http://hydra.usc.edu/gxe.
  • 23.Simpson J, Smith A, Ansell P, Roman E. Childhood leukaemia and infectious exposure: a report from the United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study (UKCCS) Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:2396–403. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.07.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pless CE, Pless IB. How well they remember. The accuracy of parent reports. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:553–8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170180083016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.McKinney PA, Alexander FE, Nicholson C, Cartwright RA, Carrette J. Mothers’ reports of childhood vaccinations and infections and their concordance with general practitioner records. J Public Health Med. 1991;13:13–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Newton R, Crouch S, Ansell P, Simpson J, Willett EV, Smith A, Burton C, Jack A, Roman E. Hodgkin’s lymphoma and infection: findings from a UK case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:1310–4. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jarrett RF. The role of viruses in the genesis of Hodgkin lymphoma. In: Engert A, Horning SJ, editors. Hodgkin lymphoma: A comprehensive update on diagnostics and clinics. Springer-Verlag; Heidelberg; New York: 2011. pp. 21–32. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Shiramizu B, Chang CW, Cairo MS. Absence of human herpesvirus-6 genome by polymerase chain reaction in children with Hodgkin disease: a Children’s Cancer Group Lymphoma Biology Study. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2001;23:282–5. doi: 10.1097/00043426-200106000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trovato R, Di Lollo S, Calzolari A, Torelli G, Ceccherini-Nelli L. Detection of human herpesvirus-6 and Epstein-Barr virus genome in childhood Hodgkin’s disease. Pathologica. 1994;86:500–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Siddon A, Lozovatsky L, Mohamed A, Hudnall SD. Human herpesvirus 6 positive Reed-Sternberg cells in nodular sclerosis Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol. 2012;158:635–43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2012.09206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Goldin LR, Landgren O, Kristinsson SY, Bjorkholm M, Paltiel O. Infection in infancy and subsequent risk of developing lymphoma in children and young adults. Blood. 2011;117:1670–2. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-306274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Rudant J, Orsi L, Monnereau A, Patte C, Pacquement H, Landman-Parker J, Bergeron C, Robert A, Michel G, Lambilliotte A, Aladjidi N, Gandemer V, et al. Childhood Hodgkin’s lymphoma, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and factors related to the immune system: the Escale Study (SFCE) Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2236–47. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Michos A, Dessypris N, Pourtsidis A, Moschovi M, Polychronopoulou S, Athanasiadou-Piperopoulou F, Kalmanti M, Syriopoulou VP, Mavrouli MD, Petridou ET. Delayed exposure to infections and childhood lymphomas: a case-control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2009;20:795–802. doi: 10.1007/s10552-009-9294-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Chang ET, Montgomery SM, Richiardi L, Ehlin A, Ekbom A, Lambe M. Number of siblings and risk of Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1236–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Alexander FE, Jarrett RF, Lawrence D, Armstrong AA, Freeland J, Gokhale DA, Kane E, Taylor GM, Wright DH, Cartwright RA. Risk factors for Hodgkin’s disease by Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status: prior infection by EBV and other agents. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1117–21. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ekstrom K, Hjalgrim H, Brandt L, Baecklund E, Klareskog L, Ekbom A, Askling J. Risk of malignant lymphomas in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and in their first-degree relatives. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:963–70. doi: 10.1002/art.10939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mellemkjaer L, Alexander F, Olsen JH. Cancer among children of parents with autoimmune diseases. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1353–7. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hemminki K, Li X, Sundquist K, Sundquist J. Shared familial risk factors between cancer and RA patients. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008;47:549–51. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Linabery AM, Jurek AM, Duval S, Ross JA. The association between atopy and childhood/adolescent leukemia: a meta-analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171:749–64. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dikalioti SK, Chang ET, Dessypris N, Papadopoulou C, Skenderis N, Pourtsidis A, Moschovi M, Polychronopoulou S, Athanasiadou-Piperopoulou F, Sidi V, Kalmanti M, Petridou ET. Allergy-associated symptoms in relation to childhood non-Hodgkin’s as contrasted to Hodgkin’s lymphomas: a case-control study in Greece and meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:1860–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chang ET, Zheng T, Weir EG, Borowitz M, Mann RB, Spiegelman D, Mueller NE. Childhood social environment and Hodgkin’s lymphoma: new findings from a population-based case-control study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13:1361–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Becker N, de Sanjose S, Nieters A, Maynadie M, Foretova L, Cocco PL, Staines A, Alvaro T, Vornanen M, Brennan P, Boffetta P. Birth order, allergies and lymphoma risk: results of the European collaborative research project Epilymph. Leuk Res. 2007;31:1365–72. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2007.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Pahwa P, McDuffie HH, Dosman JA, Robson D, McLaughlin JR, Spinelli JJ, Fincham S. Exposure to animals and selected risk factors among Canadian farm residents with Hodgkin’s disease, multiple myeloma, or soft tissue sarcoma. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:857–68. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000083033.56116.c1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Vineis P, Crosignani P, Sacerdote C, Fontana A, Masala G, Miligi L, Nanni O, Ramazzotti V, Rodella S, Stagnaro E, Tumino R, Vigano C, et al. Haematopoietic cancer and medical history: a multicentre case control study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54:431–6. doi: 10.1136/jech.54.6.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Soderberg KC, Jonsson F, Winqvist O, Hagmar L, Feychting M. Autoimmune diseases, asthma and risk of haematological malignancies: a nationwide case-control study in Sweden. Eur J Cancer. 2006;42:3028–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Cozen W, Hamilton AS, Zhao P, Salam MT, Deapen DM, Nathwani BN, Weiss LM, Mack TM. A protective role for early oral exposures in the etiology of young adult Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood. 2009;114:4014–20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-03-209601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Center for Health Statistics . Health Data Interactive. Allergic conditions, ages 0-17: US, 1997-2011; Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: US, 1997-2011 (Source: NHIS) National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD: [Accessed March 25, 2013]. 2013. www.cdc.gov/nchs.hdi.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Hughes AM, Lightfoot T, Simpson J, Ansell P, McKinney PA, Kinsey SE, Mitchell CD, Eden TO, Greaves M, Roman E. Allergy and risk of childhood leukaemia: results from the UKCCS. Int J Cancer. 2007;121:819–24. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Samoszuk M, Ramzi E. IgE, Reed-Sternberg cells, and eosinophilia in Hodgkin’s disease. Leuk Lymphoma. 1993;9:315–9. doi: 10.3109/10428199309148528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Barzon L, Lavezzo E, Militello V, Toppo S, Palu G. Applications of next-generation sequencing technologies to diagnostic virology. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12:7861–84. doi: 10.3390/ijms12117861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

RESOURCES