Skip to main content
Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports logoLink to Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports
. 2014 Jun 26;75(1):e160–e169. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1378157

Giant Petroclival Primary Intradural Chordoma: Case Report and Systematic Review of the Literature

Fahad AlOtaibi 1,2, Marie-Christine Guiot 3, Thierry Muanza 4, Salvatore Di Maio 1,
PMCID: PMC4110134  PMID: 25083378

Abstract

Background Chordomas are rare, locally aggressive neoplasms thought to arise from notochordal remnants in the axial skeleton. Primary intradural chordomas are considered to be extremely rare. In this article a giant intradural petroclival chordoma is presented, and a synthesis of the available literature is performed to measure overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) and to identify prognostic factors.

Methods A systematic Medline review yielded 47 patients with purely intradural tumors from 38 publications including 39 chordomas, 8 cases of ecchordosis physaliphora, and 1 case with features of both. The 5-year OS and RFS were calculated based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for progression or mortality were analyzed using binomial logistic regression.

Results Maximal tumor diameter varied from 1.5 to 6.0 cm (mean: 3.2 cm). Tumors were located predominantly in the prepontine area (66.7%). Combined 5-year Kaplan-Meier OS and RFS were 77% ± 11% and 74% ± 11%, respectively. Incomplete surgical resection, larger tumor diameter, and an elevated Ki-67 index were statistically more frequent in cases of recurrence and mortality.

Conclusions Based on a systematic literature review, the behavior of primary intradural chordomas may be closer to typical chordomas than was previously thought.

Keywords: chordoma, notochord, skull base neoplasms, brainstem neoplasms

Introduction

Chordomas are rare locally aggressive neoplasms of notochordal origin, constituting 2 to 4% of primary bone tumors.1 In contrast to ecchordosis physaliphora (EP), which are usually small incidentally discovered rests of tissue within the clivus or retroclival space, cranial base chordomas mostly arise extradurally and produce symptoms secondary to growth and bony destruction. Rare cases of extraosseous intradural chordoma have been reported and generally considered to have a more favorable prognosis relative to typical chordomas.2 3 4 We report a case of a giant intradural chordoma lacking bony involvement. We furthermore performed a systemic review of the literature to (1) assess for clinical, histologic, and radiologic differences between intradural chordoma and EP; (2) summarize overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) data; and (3) identify risk factors impacting 5-year RFS and OS in patients with intradural chordomas and EP.

Materials and Methods

The current study is a systematic review of the literature applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines.5 All studies included were case reports or small primarily retrospective case series.

Search Strategy

A systematic electronic article search was conducted through Medline between 1974 and 2013, using the Medical Subject Heading terms chordoma, ecchordosis physaliphora, notochord, bone neoplasms, and skull base neoplasms. Titles and abstracts were then reviewed to identify cases of intradural chordomas or ecchordosis physaliphora. A manual search was also conducted from the reference lists of selected articles to identify additional studies. Of these articles, a full-text review was performed by two coauthors independently (F.A. and S.D.), applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to obtain a final group of included studies. Studies were included if (1) they reported patients with histologically confirmed intradural chordomas or ecchordosis physaliphora; (2) patients were symptomatic and/or had large (≥ 3 cm maximal diameter) or growing tumors; and (3) tumors were found to have bony stalk without evidence of bony destruction. Articles were excluded if (1) patients were asymptomatic and/or had small (< 1 cm maximal diameter) tumors; (2) if the article was an autopsy, nonsurgical, or pure radiologic series; and (3) if the patient was treated in the era before computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Data Collection

After a final list of articles was assembled, individual patient data were extracted and compiled on to a master database. Patient age, sex, tumor size, location, pathologic diagnosis, presenting symptoms, extent of surgical resection, adjuvant therapy, follow-up duration, recurrence, and mortality were all recorded.

Statistical Analyses

From the compiled patient database, 5-year overall OS and RFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk factors for progression or mortality were analyzed using binomial logistic regression. An assessment of risk of bias was not possible for this study. A p value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Statistics were performed using IBM SPSS v.21.0 (IBM, Inc, Armonk, New York, United States).

Results

An initial systematic Medline search yielded 416 publications. After screening based on title and abstract review and applying the previously described inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 38 publications including 47 patients. The details of each study are tabulated in Appendix A, and subject demographics from the literature cases and ours (48 patients total) are summarized in Table 1. Patient age ranged from 9 to 76 years (mean: 42.8 years) and maximal tumor diameter varied from 1.5 to 6 cm (mean: 3.2 cm). Tumors were located predominantly in the prepontine (66.7%) and sellar/suprasellar/hypothalamic (18.8%) areas, and the postoperative follow-up ranged from 3 weeks to 144 months (mean: 30.2 months). Pathologic diagnosis was reported as chordoma in 39 cases and ecchordosis physaliphora in 8 cases. In one series of two patients in which the distinction of EP versus chordoma was not explicitly made,6 the diagnosis was inferred based on the histologic description provided in the manuscript (one EP and one chordoma). In one case, histologic features of both chordoma and EP were reported.7 Of 43 of 48 patients for whom extent of surgical resection was reported, 25 had complete or near-complete resection, whereas 18 had subtotal removal. Information regarding adjuvant radiation therapy was available in 41 of 48 cases. Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered in seven cases; all of these patients had undergone subtotal resections. In most cases, radiation therapy was not given (32/41 cases) or given only at recurrence (2/41 cases). None of the cases had bony involvement. In four cases, a bony stalk was observed connecting the intradural tumor to the clivus but without frank bony destruction. In the remaining cases, a bony stalk was absent. Clinical presentation varied between cases but was mainly secondary to brainstem involvement: 52.5% of patients experienced headaches, cranial nerve palsies were observed in 41.5%, and gait disturbance in 30%. Most of the cases presented with subacute to chronic symptoms, and only a few presented with acute neurologic deterioration related to tumoral hemorrhage. One case of EP presented with fatal diffuse nonaneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and another chordoma with intratumoral hemorrhage.3 8

Appendix A. Summary of included articles.

Study Country of origin Tumor location Age, y/Sex Extent of resection Adjuvant therapy Pathology
Mathews and Wilson13 USA Intrasellar 41/male Complete NA Chordoma
Stam and Kamphorst28 The Netherlands Prepontine 75/female NA NA EP
Mapstone et al14 USA Prepontine 26/male Subtotal None Chordoma
Vaquero et al29 USA Suprasellar 39/male Complete None Chordoma
Yuhi et al2 N/A Prepontine 28/male NA NA Chordoma
Wolfe and Scheithauer6 USA Intrasellar 44/male Procedure terminated None Chordoma
USA Suprasellar 70/female Complete None EP
Katayama et al30 Japan Foramen magnum 30/female Complete None Chordoma
Warnick et al1 USA Tentorium cerebelli 58/male Subtotal None Chordoma
Hardie31 N/A Prepontine 28/female NA NA Chordoma
Commins et al32 USA Hypothalamus 51/female Complete None Chordoma
Tashiro33 Japan Prepontine 56/female NA None Chordoma
Wanibuchi et al34 N/A Suprasellar 54/male Complete None Chordoma
Akimoto et al35 USA Prepontine 51/female Complete None EP
Nishigaya et al36 Japan Prepontine 56/male Subtotal None Chordoma
Toda et al37 Japan Prepontine 56/female Complete None EP
Korinth et al38 Germany Basal cisterns 48/female Subtotal SRS to residual Chordoma
Rodríguez et al7 Venezuela Prepontine 54/female Complete NA EP and chordoma
Danilewicz et al39 N/A Prepontine 19/female Complete None Chordoma
Cha et al40 USA Prepontine 49/male Complete None EP
Steenberghs et al41 Belgium Prepontine NA NA NA Chordoma
Dow et al42 United Kingdom Cerebellar 9/female Complete None Chordoma
Masui et al4 Japan Prepontine 63/male Complete None Chordoma
Takeyama et al17 Japan Prepontine 12/male Subtotal None EP
Uda et al3 Japan Prepontine 35/female Subtotal SRS to residual at recurrence Chordoma
Ling et al18 Australia Prepontine 45/male Complete None EP
Roberti et al43 USA Prepontine NA Complete None Chordoma
USA Sellar NA Complete None Chordoma
USA Prepontine 58/male Complete None Chordoma
Chang et al44 USA Prepontine 9/male Complete None Chordoma
Alkan et al45 Turkey Prepontine 22/male Subtotal None EP
Choo et al46 Korea Prepontine 43/female Subtotal SRS to residual Chordoma
Ciarpaglini et al47 Italy Prepontine 60/male Subtotal None Chordoma
Bergmann et al15 Germany Prepontine 76/male Subtotal None Chordoma
Bhat et al48 India Prepontine 30/male Complete None Chordoma
Ito et al49 Japan Prepontine 59/female Subtotal LINAC fXRT Chordoma
Japan Prepontine 75/female Complete Gamma knife SRS for recurrences only Chordoma
Jiagang et al50 China Suprasellar 51/male Complete None Chordoma
Figueiredo et al51 Brazil Pineal and intra-abdominal (history of VP shunt placement) 18/male Biopsy None Chordoma; prior surgery for presumed germinoma 7 y prior (histologic diagnosis revised)
Anderson et al52 USA Disseminated 13/female Subtotal fXRT Chordoma
Kim et al53 Republic of Korea Sellar-suprasellar 55/female Complete N/A Chordoma
Wang et al16 China Prepontine 22/male Complete None Chordoma
China Prepontine 45/male Subtotal None Chordoma
China Prepontine 28/male Complete None Chordoma
China Prepontine 40/female Subtotal fXRT Chordoma
China Prepontine 41/female Subtotal fXRT Chordoma
China Prepontine 39/male Subtotal None Chordoma
Current case Canada Petroclival 51/male Near-complete IMRT Chordoma

Abbreviations: EP, ecchordosis physaliphora; fXRT, fractionated radiotherapy; IMRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy; NA, not available; SRS, stereotactic radiosurgery.

Table 1. Subject demographics.

No. of subjects 48 (25 males/20 females/3 not specified)
Mean age 42.8 ± 17.9 y (range: 9.0–76.0 y)
Follow-up 30.2 ± 33.0 mo (range: 0.75–144.0 mo)
Tumor location
 Prepontine 32/48 (66.7%)
 Sellar/suprasellar/hypothalamic 9/48 (18.8%)
 Other (cerebellar, foramen magnum, tentorial, pineal, petroclival, disseminated) 7/48 (14.6%)
Maximal tumor diameter 3.2 ± 1.3 cm (range: 1.5–6.0 cm)
Reported histology Chordoma: 38/48 (79.2%)
EP: 9/48 (18.8%)
Chordoma and EP 1/48 (2.1%)
Presenting symptoms
 Cranial nerve palsy 17/41 (41.5%)
 Headaches 21/40 (52.5%)
 Intraventricular hemorrhage 1/40 (2.5%)
 Gait disturbance 12/40 (30.0%)
 Tinnitus 3/40 (7.5%)
 Speech disturbance 3/40 (7.5%)
 Motor weakness 7/40 (17.5%)
 Memory disturbance 6/40 (15.0%)
 Visual signs or symptoms 9/40 (22.5%)
 Sensory symptoms 3/40 (7.5%)
Adjuvant radiation therapy
 Upfront 7/41 (17.0%)
 At recurrence 2/41 (4.9%)
 None 32/41 (78.0%)
 Information not specified 7/48

Abbreviation: EP, ecchordosis physaliphora.

Survival data were available for 32 of 48 patients. Based on the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the compiled available individual patient data, 5-year RFS was 74% ± 11%, and mean RFS was 112.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.6–137.5 months) (Fig. 1A). The 5-year OS was 77% ± 11%; excluding 30-day surgical mortality, 5-year OS was 87% ± 7%. Mean OS was 115.9 months (95% CI, 90.7–141.2 months) (Fig. 1B). The 5-year OS for patients undergoing complete resection was 92% ± 8%, compared with 63% ± 18% for those with subtotal resection (p = 0.00004). The 5-year RFS for patients undergoing complete resection was 83% ± 15, compared with 64% ± 15% for those with subtotal resection (p = 0.00290). Patients who developed recurrence had a larger tumor diameter (4.3 ± 0.5 cm versus 3.2 ± 1.2 cm; p = 0.0390) and a more elevated Ki-67 index (6.83 ± 1.21% versus 1.03 ± 1.84%; p < 0.001) compared with those who did not (Tables 2 and 3). Similarly, patients who died had a larger tumor diameter (4.8 ± 0.8 cm versus 3.2 ± 1.2 cm; p = 0.039) and a more elevated Ki-67 index (6.83 ± 1.21% versus 1.03 ± 1.84%; p < 0.001) than those who survived. No other recurrence or survival-related risk factors analyzed were found to be statistically significant.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(A) Kaplan-Meier recurrence-free survival (RFS) curve of 32 of 48 patients with primary intradural chordoma. The 5-year RFS was 74% ± 11%, and mean RFS was 112.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.6–137.5 months). (B) Kaplan-Meier overall survival (OS) curve of 32 of 48 patients with primary intradural chordoma. The 5-year OS was 77% ± 11%; excluding 30-day surgical mortality, 5-year OS was 87% ± 7%. Mean OS was 115.9 months (95% CI, 90.7–141.2 months).

Table 2. Risk factors associated with recurrence in 32/48 patients with intradural chordoma or ecchordosis physaliphora.

Recurrence (n = 5) No recurrence (n = 27) p value
Maximal diameter, cm 4.3 ± 0.5 3.1 ± 1.3 0.010
Age, y 46.0 ± 16.4 38.2 ± 19.0 0.381
Sex 1 male/4 females 17 males/8 females 0.130
Enhancement 5 yes/0 no 18 yes/7 no 0.355
Pathology 5 chordoma/0 EP 22 chordoma / 5 EP 0.284
Bony stalk 0 yes / 5 no 3 yes/24 no 0.424
Ki-67, % 5.12 ± 3.56 1.08% ± 1.88 0.004

Abbreviation: EP, ecchordosis physaliphora.

Table 3. Risk factors associated with overall survival in 32/48 patients with intradural chordoma or ecchordosis physaliphora.

Nonsurviving (n = 4) Surviving (n = 28) p value
Maximal diameter, cm 4.8 ± 0.8 3.2 ± 1.2 0.039
Age, y 39.8 ± 0.9 cm 39.5 ± 19.6 0.980
Sex 1 male/3 females 16 males/10 females 0.170
Enhancement 4 yes/0 no 21 yes/7 no 0.467
Pathology 4 chordoma/0 EP 26 chordoma/2 EP 0.358
Bony stalk 0 yes/5 no 3 yes/24 no 0.492
Ki-67, % 6.83 ± 1.21 1.03 ± 1.84 < 0.001

Abbreviation: EP, ecchordosis physaliphora.

Case Illustration

The patient is a 51-year-old right-handed man who works as a janitor. He presented with a 2-year history of balance difficulty and initially vertical diplopia, followed by diplopia in all vectors. He also complained of decreased hearing and facial sensation on the left side. On examination, he had near-complete ophthalmoplegia in the left eye, as well as left ptosis and a fixed, dilated pupil. There was 20% subjective sensation in the left V1–3 dermatomes. His gait was ataxic, and he had psychomotor slowing as well as mild word-finding difficulty. He had diffuse hyperreflexia, and positive Hoffman and Babinski reflexes. There was bilateral upper and lower extremity dysmetria.

His magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a giant left petroclival intradural lesion extended from the jugular foramen caudally and superior to the tentorium to the parasellar space and cavernous sinus (Fig. 2). A head computed tomography (CT) demonstrated a lack of any bony destruction, remodeling, or tumoral involvement. There was severe effacement of the brainstem and partial encasement of the basilar and ipsilateral vertebral arteries. The lesion appeared lobulated, hyperintense on T2, hypointense on T1, and there was only mild heterogeneous enhancement. The preoperative differential diagnosis included atypical meningioma, schwannoma, neuroepithelial cyst, and chordoma. A preoperative CT scan did not demonstrate any bony involvement of the tumor.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Preoperative (A) sagittal T1, (B) axial T2, and (C) coronal T1 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with gadolinium demonstrating a large left petroclival intradural chordoma. (D) Preoperative computed tomography (CT) did not demonstrate any bony involvement. (E–G) Postoperative MRI showing near-complete resection with a likely small residual in the left cavernous sinus (F, arrow). (H) Postoperative CT showing skeletonization of semicircular canals. Preoperative CT did not disclose any bony involvement.

Operation

The patient underwent a left-sided posterior transpetrosal approach. Intraoperative monitoring of long tract motor- and sensory-evoked potentials, as well as brainstem auditory evoked responses and cortically evoked facial nerve motor-evoked potentials was performed. The presigmoid dura was opened from above the jugular bulb across the superior petrosal sinus and to the temporal lobe. The vein of Labbé was seen coursing posteriorly to drain into the transverse sinus. The tentorium was divided posterior to the course of the trochlear nerve. An expansile mass was seen medial to the trochlear, trigeminal and VII–VIII nerves. It was debulked and mobilized without difficulty. Superiorly, the tumor was resected up to the cavernous sinus; however, the visualization offered by the approach was inadequate and a small remnant was believed to have been left behind. Medially, the tumor dissected very well off the brainstem and basilar artery. The tumor was followed into Meckel cave, which was partially unroofed and packed with Surgicel and Tisseel following tumor removal. The remainder of the tumor was removed, and intraoperative monitoring remained pristine throughout the case.

Pathology

All the histologic sections examined showed the presence of a tumoral proliferation composed of cells with vacuolated cytoplasm and areas resembling cartilage (Fig. 3). In some areas, the cells formed anastomotic cords floating in a chondroid type of matrix. Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry was strongly positive, and there was focal but definite positivity for both S-100 and brachyury. The Ki-67 index was very low (< 0.5%), with only a few positive nuclei. Final diagnosis was consistent with chordoma.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections showing a tumoral proliferation composed of cells with (A) vacuolated cytoplasm and (B) areas resembling cartilage. (C) Cytokeratin immunohistochemistry was strongly positive. (D) There was nuclear positivity for brachyury. Final pathology was consistent with chordoma.

Postoperative Course

Postoperative MRI (Fig. 2) demonstrated complete resection of the posterior fossa tumor with an expected small remnant within the cavernous sinus. His postoperative course was complicated by a single partial complex seizure on postoperative day 1, for which antiepileptic medication was not started, and there were no further episodes. He also developed a pseudomeningocele that resolved spontaneously without specific intervention. His ataxia, weakness, psychomotor slowing, ptosis, and diplopia all resolved postoperatively, although clinically he continues to have a trochlear nerve palsy.

At 3 months postoperatively, the patient received fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) with an intensity-modulated radiotherapy RAPID Arc system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, California, United States) using MRI fusion. A total dose of 52 Gy was delivered in 28 fractions. His last follow-up MRI at 12 months from surgery demonstrated no recurrence of the tumor.

Discussion

Luschka first described his finding of pathologic ectopic notochordal tissue at the posterior clivus in 1856.9 In 1857, Virchow gave the first microscopic description and termed the lesion ecchondrosis physaliphora, believing it to be a process affecting the cartilage of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis.10 One year later, Müller correctly proposed a notochordal origin,11 and in 1894, Ribbert and Steiger coined the term ecchordosis to reflect a presumed notochordal origin of these lesions.12 EP is considered to be an ectopic notochordal remnant lacking internal proliferative potential.4 Whether EP is the precursor of skull base chordoma remains controversial.13 14 15 Furthermore, debate persists regarding whether large symptomatic EP is truly distinct from intradural chordoma, or whether they are terms describing the same pathologic entity.2 3 7

Wolfe and Scheithauer et al6 proposed the term intradural chordoma should be for all lesions, including EP, whereas Rodríguez et al7 argued that all instances of symptomatic, intradural, extraosseous physaliphora cell growth should be classified as giant or symptomatic EP so long as the existence of an intradural chordoma is not definitely proved. Histologically, EP and intradural chordoma display many similarities including the presence of typical “vacuolated cells” and positive staining for Brachyury and Galectin-3. Pragmatically speaking, in many cases the pathologic diagnosis is influenced and supported by the clinical picture and radiologic findings. Specific histologic differences have been proposed including a smaller cell number and absence of extracellular mucus-like matrix or necrotic cells in EP.13 14 15 Wang et al16 described the volume of EPs to be characteristically less than intradural chordomas, with the largest reported diameter < 2 cm; however, there are literature instances of so-called EP with diameters of 4 cm,17 3 cm,7 and 3 cm.18 Other distinguishing features proposed include the presence of clinical symptoms including those related to brainstem compression and/or cranial nerves palsies in true chordomas, a low Ki-67 index in EP,19 as well as contrast enhancement in true chordomas versus lack of enhancement in EP.20 The presence of a bony stalk was reported in several cases; however, we did not find it to be a distinguishing feature of EP versus chordoma, nor did it appear to affect prognosis.

Based on prior case reports and small series, intradural chordomas have generally been considered to have a more favorable prognosis and a different biologic behavior relative to typical cranial base chordomas.8 The data from our systematic review suggest that both 5-year RFS and OS appear to be comparable with typical chordomas, particularly following a complete surgical resection. In a recent meta-analysis of cranial base chordomas,21 5-year RFS was 87% in patients with complete resection compared with 50% in patients with incomplete resection, and 5-year OS was 95% with complete resection versus 71% without. This is similar to our study, in which 5-year RFS for patients undergoing complete resection was 83% ± 15, compared with 64% ± 15% for those with subtotal resection, and in which 5-year OS was 92% ± 8% with complete resection, compared with 63% ± 18% with incomplete resection (p < 0.001). Thus although a gross total resection may be more feasible for true intradural chordomas, their biologic behavior may nevertheless be similar to classic skull base chordomas and is reflected by similar survival of both subtypes after complete and incomplete resections.

The cellular and molecular mechanisms by which chordomas effectuate bony invasion and overall aggressiveness remain poorly understood, and in light of the relative rarity of intradural chordomas and EP, differentiating features are as yet lacking. Proteases may be implicated in bony destruction in chordomas. Matrix metalloproteinases22 and cathepsin K22 23 have been investigated as potential mediators; their increased expression appear related to worse prognosis. Adhesion proteins may also mediate tumor invasiveness in chordomas. Upregulation of N-cadherin and downregulation of E-cadherin may be correlated with worse clinical behavior of some chordomas.24 Upregulation of specific proto-oncogenes have also been evaluated, including c-MET and hepatocyte growth factor expression.25 Fascin overexpression was also correlated with increased chordoma invasiveness and dural penetration, implicating increased cell motility as a potential mechanism.26 Increased telomerase activity also appears to correlate with chordoma recurrence and possible aggressiveness.27 The cellular proliferative potential, as measured by the Ki-67 staining index, has been reported to distinguish EP from chordoma.14 15 Reported cases of EP typically have a Ki-67 index < 1%, whereas in chordoma it is > 2%. Accordingly, all the cases included in our systematic review demonstrated a Ki-67 index < 2% in EP.

Our study is subject to several important limitations. All included studies are of a retrospective nature composed primarily of case reports and a few small case series, and they subject our meta-analysis to potential publication bias. Heterogeneity in the compiled cohort was observed due to local differences in the use of adjuvant radiation therapy, and often unclear justification for the pathologic distinction between EP and true chordoma. The histologic distinguishing features between chordoma and EP are unclear; there is heterogeneity in the pathologic distinction of intradural cases included in our literature synthesis. Finally, the overall small population limits statistical power.

Conclusion

Intradural cranial base chordomas are extremely rare. There is lack of uniform agreement regarding the distinguishing features of chordoma and ecchordosis physaliphora, particularly for large symptomatic tumors. Based on our meta-analysis, the clinical behavior of intradural chordomas may be closer to typical cranial base chordomas than was previously recognized. This finding may influence clinical management, particularly the use of adjuvant radiation therapy as in our case illustration.

Footnotes

Disclosure The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this article.

References

  • 1.Warnick R E, Raisanen J, Kaczmar T Jr, Davis R L, Prados M D. Intradural chordoma of the tentorium cerebelli. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1991;74(3):508–511. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.74.3.0508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yuhi F Asakura T Tomosugi T Kusumoto K Awa H Uetsuhara K A case of clival chordoma without bone destruction [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1986144547–552. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Uda T, Ohata K, Takami T, Hara M. An intradural skull base chordoma presenting with acute intratumoral hemorrhage. Neurol India. 2006;54(3):306–307. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.27162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Masui K, Kawai S, Yonezawa T, Fujimoto K, Nishi N. Intradural retroclival chordoma without bone involvement—case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46(11):552–555. doi: 10.2176/nmc.46.552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Moher D Liberati A Tetzlaff J Altman D G; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement BMJ 2009339b2535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wolfe J T III, Scheithauer B W. “Intradural chordoma” or “giant ecchordosis physaliphora”? Report of two cases. Clin Neuropathol. 1987;6(3):98–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rodríguez L, Colina J, López J, Molina O, Cardozo J. Intradural prepontine growth: giant ecchordosis physaliphora or extraosseous chordoma? Neuropathology. 1999;19:336–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Fracasso T, Brinkmann B, Paulus W. Sudden death due to subarachnoid bleeding from ecchordosis physaliphora. Int J Legal Med. 2008;122(3):225–227. doi: 10.1007/s00414-007-0192-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Luschka H. Die altersveränderungen der Zwischenwirbelknorpel. Virchows Arch. 1856;9:311–327. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Virchow R LK. Berlin, Germany: Reimer; 1857. Untersuchungen über die Entwickelung des Schädelgrundes im gesunden und krankhaften zustand: und über den einfluss derselben auf Schädelform, Gesichtsbildung und Gehirnbau. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Müller H. Ueber das Vorkommen von Resten der Chorda dorsalis bei Menschen nach der Geburt und über ihr Verhältniss zu den Gallertgeschwülsten am Clivus. Ztschr F Rat Med. 1858;2:202–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ribbert H, Steiner H. Uber die Ecchondrosis physalifora spheno-occipitalis. Zentralbl Allg Pathol Anat. 1894;5:457–461. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mathews W, Wilson C B. Ectopic intrasellar chordoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1974;40(2):260–263. doi: 10.3171/jns.1974.40.2.0260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mapstone T B, Kaufman B, Ratcheson R A. Intradural chordoma without bone involvement: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) appearance. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(3):535–537. doi: 10.3171/jns.1983.59.3.0535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bergmann M, Abdalla Y, Neubauer U, Schildhaus H U, Probst-Cousin S. Primary intradural chordoma: report on three cases and review of the literature. Clin Neuropathol. 2010;29(3):169–176. doi: 10.5414/npp29169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang L Wu Z Tian K Li G Zhang J Clinical and pathological features of intradural retroclival chordoma World Neurosurg 2013; February 13 (Epub ahead of print) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Takeyama J, Hayashi T, Shirane R. Notochordal remnant-derived mass: ecchordosis physaliphora or chordoma? Pathology. 2006;38(6):599–600. doi: 10.1080/00313020601023948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ling S S, Sader C, Robbins P, Rajan G P. A case of giant ecchordosis physaliphora: a case report and literature review. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(7):931–933. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318068b2c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amer H Z, Hameed M. Intraosseous benign notochordal cell tumor. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2010;134(2):283–288. doi: 10.5858/134.2.283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mehnert F, Beschorner R, Küker W, Hahn U, Nägele T. Retroclival ecchordosis physaliphora: MR imaging and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(10):1851–1855. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Di Maio S, Temkin N, Ramanathan D, Sekhar L N. Current comprehensive management of cranial base chordomas: 10-year meta-analysis of observational studies. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(6):1094–1105. doi: 10.3171/2011.7.JNS11355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Naka T, Kuester D, Boltze C. et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases-1, -2, and -9; tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases-1 and -2; cathepsin B; urokinase plasminogen activator; and plasminogen activator inhibitor, type I in skull base chordoma. Hum Pathol. 2008;39(2):217–223. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Haeckel C, Krueger S, Kuester D. et al. Expression of cathepsin K in chordoma. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(7):834–840. doi: 10.1053/hupa.2000.8448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Triana A, Sen C, Wolfe D, Hazan R. Cadherins and catenins in clival chordomas: correlation of expression with tumor aggressiveness. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29(11):1422–1434. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000180447.25141.a4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Naka T, Kuester D, Boltze C. et al. Expression of hepatocyte growth factor and c-MET in skull base chordoma. Cancer. 2008;112(1):104–110. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gao Z, Zhang Q, Kong F. et al. Fascin expression in skull base chordoma: correlation with tumor recurrence and dura erosion. Med Oncol. 2012;29(4):2438–2444. doi: 10.1007/s12032-012-0182-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pallini R, Maira G, Pierconti F. et al. Chordoma of the skull base: predictors of tumor recurrence. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(4):812–822. doi: 10.3171/jns.2003.98.4.0812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Stam F C, Kamphorst W. Ecchordosis physaliphora as a cause of fatal pontine hemorrhage. Eur Neurol. 1982;21(2):90–93. doi: 10.1159/000115460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Vaquero J, Martinez R, Rossi E, Bravo G. Chordoma. Neurosurgery. 1983;13(6):737–738. doi: 10.1097/00006123-198312000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Katayama Y, Tsubokawa T, Hirasawa T, Takahata T, Nemoto N. Intradural extraosseous chordoma in the foramen magnum region. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(6):976–979. doi: 10.3171/jns.1991.75.6.0976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hardie R C. Magnetic resonance appearance of a rare intradural chordoma. Wis Med J. 1992;91(11):627–628. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Commins D, Baran G A, Molleston M, Vollmer D. Hypothalamic chordoma. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1994;81(1):130–132. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.81.1.0130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tashiro T, Fukuda T, Inoue Y. et al. Intradural chordoma: case report and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 1994;36(4):313–315. doi: 10.1007/BF00593269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wanibuchi M Uede T Ishiguro M Tatewaki K Kurokawa Y Yoshida Y A case of suprasellar intradural chordoma [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 1994223269–272. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Akimoto J Takeda H Hashimoto T Haraoka J Ito H A surgical case of ecchordosis physaliphora [in Japanese]. No Shinkei Geka 199624111021–1025. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Nishigaya K, Kaneko M, Ohashi Y, Nukui H. Intradural retroclival chordoma without bone involvement: no tumor regrowth 5 years after operation. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1998;88(4):764–768. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.88.4.0764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Toda H, Kondo A, Iwasaki K. Neuroradiological characteristics of ecchordosis physaliphora. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(5):830–834. doi: 10.3171/jns.1998.89.5.0830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Korinth M, Schönrock L, Mayfrank L, Gilsbach J M. Primary intradural pontocerebellar chordoma metastasizing in the subarachnoid spinal canal. Zentralbl Neurochir. 1999;60(3):146–150. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Danilewicz B Danilewicz M Czepko R Stachura K Intradural clivus chordoma: surgical treatment with no tumor regrowth 12 years after surgery [in Polish]. Przegl Lek 2000573178–180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cha S T, Jarrahy R, Yong W H, Eby T, Shahinian H K. A rare symptomatic presentation of ecchordosis physaliphora and unique endoscope-assisted surgical management. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002;45(1):36–40. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-23584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Steenberghs J Kiekens C Menten J Monstrey J Intradural chordoma without bone involvement. Case report and review of the literature J Neurosurg 200297(1, Suppl):94–97. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Dow G R, Robson D K, Jaspan T, Punt J A. Intradural cerebellar chordoma in a child: a case report and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(3):188–191. doi: 10.1007/s00381-002-0707-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Roberti F, Sekhar L N, Jones R V, Wright D C. Intradural cranial chordoma: a rare presentation of an uncommon tumor. Surgical experience and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(2):270–274. doi: 10.3171/jns.2007.106.2.270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chang S W Gore P A Nakaji P Rekate H L Juvenile intradural chordoma: case report Neurosurgery 2008622E525–E526.; discussion E527 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alkan O, Yildirim T, Kizilkiliç O, Tan M, Cekinmez M. A case of ecchordosis physaliphora presenting with an intratumoral hemorrhage. Turk Neurosurg. 2009;19(3):293–296. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Choo Y S, Joo S W, Noh S J, Lee S I. Intradural retroclival chordoma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;46(2):152–155. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.2.152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ciarpaglini R Pasquini E Mazzatenta D Ambrosini-Spaltro A Sciarretta V Frank G Intradural clival chordoma and ecchordosis physaliphora: a challenging differential diagnosis: case report Neurosurgery 2009642E387–E388.; discussion E388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bhat D I, Yasha M, Rojin A, Sampath S, Shankar S K. Intradural clival chordoma: a rare pathological entity. J Neurooncol. 2010;96(2):287–290. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-9949-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Ito E Saito K Nagatani T et al. Intradural cranial chordoma World Neurosurg 2010733194–197.; discussion e31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jiagang L, Yanhui L, Xueying S, Qing M. Intradural suprasellar chondroid chordoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2010;17(3):402–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Figueiredo E G, Tavares W M, Welling L, Rosemberg S, Teixeira M J. Ectopic pineal chordoma. Surg Neurol Int. 2011;2:145. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.85986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Anderson S, Sato Y, Kirby P, Buatti J M, Menezes A. Disseminated subarachnoid chordoma: long-term favorable follow-up of a pediatric patient. Pediatr Radiol. 2012;42(7):878–880. doi: 10.1007/s00247-011-2266-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kim S K, Kim Y H, Park C K, Kim M A, Park S H. Intracranial intradural chordoma presenting with intraventricular hemorrhage. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(8):1189–1192. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Neurological Surgery Reports are provided here courtesy of Thieme Medical Publishers

RESOURCES