Background: Rab17 regulates dendritic trafficking in hippocampal neurons, but the cargo molecules are unknown.
Results: Using GluK2 and GluA1 as markers, we show that Rab17 or Syntaxin-4 knockdown reduces dendritic surface expression of KARs but not AMPARs.
Conclusion: Rab17 mediates membrane insertion of GluK2 but not GluA1 via dendritic trafficking of Syntaxin-4.
Significance: Syntaxin-4 specifically regulates GluK2 trafficking.
Keywords: Ionotropic Glutamate Receptor, Membrane Trafficking, Neuron, Rab Proteins, SNARE Proteins
Abstract
Glutamate receptors are fundamental for control synaptic transmission, synaptic plasticity, and neuronal excitability. However, many of the molecular mechanisms underlying their trafficking remain elusive. We previously demonstrated that the small GTPase Rab17 regulates dendritic trafficking in hippocampal neurons. Here, we investigated the role(s) of Rab17 in AMPA receptor (AMPAR) and kainate receptor (KAR) trafficking. Although Rab17 knockdown did not affect surface expression of the AMPAR subunit GluA1 under basal or chemically induced long term potentiation conditions, it significantly reduced surface expression of the KAR subunit GluK2. Rab17 co-localizes with Syntaxin-4 in the soma, dendritic shaft, the tips of developing hippocampal neurons, and in spines. Rab17 knockdown caused Syntaxin-4 redistribution away from dendrites and into axons in developing hippocampal neurons. Syntaxin-4 knockdown reduced GluK2 but had no effect on GluA1 surface expression. Moreover, overexpression of constitutively active Rab17 promoted dendritic surface expression of GluK2 by enhancing Syntaxin-4 translocation to dendrites. These data suggest that Rab17 mediates the dendritic trafficking of Syntaxin-4 to selectively regulate dendritic surface insertion of GluK2-containing KARs in rat hippocampal neurons.
Introduction
Glutamate receptors are critical for excitatory synaptic transmission and plasticity. They are broadly classified into ionotropic and metabotropic types, and ionotropic glutamate receptors are further categorized into NMDA, AMPA, and kainate receptors (1). AMPARs3 are tetrameric complexes of combinations of four separate subunits (GluA1–4). They are highly mobile proteins that undergo constitutive- and activity-dependent translocation to, and removal from, synapses (2). Crucially, changes in the number and properties of functional synaptic AMPARs results in the long term potentiation (LTP) or long term depression of synaptic efficacy (3).
KARs are also tetrameric assemblies of combinations of five possible subunits (GluK1–5). Presynaptic KARs modulate neurotransmitter release; postsynaptic KARs mediate excitatory neurotransmission, and extrasynaptic KARs are involved in controlling neuronal excitability (4, 5). Importantly, KARs participate in the regulation of neuronal network activity and are involved in processes ranging from neuronal development to neurodegeneration and neuronal cell death (4, 5).
Multiple proteins have been identified as participating in AMPAR trafficking. These include AP-4 and KIF5, which are involved in transporting AMPARs from the soma to dendrites (6, 7); SNARE complex family proteins Syntaxin-3, Syntaxin-4, and SNAP-47 are implicated in AMPAR surface insertion (8, 9); and small GTPase Rab and Arf family proteins (i.e. Rab11 and Arf1) play roles in AMPAR internalization and/or recycling (10, 11). In contrast, relatively few interacting proteins have been implicated in KAR trafficking, although Rab11 is involved in KAR recycling and SNAP-25 in internalization (12, 13). Furthermore, the similarities and differences between the mechanisms and pathways that regulate AMPAR and KAR trafficking and surface expression have not been well defined.
Rab proteins are small GTPases that are conserved in all eukaryotes. They mediate trafficking steps, including vesicle budding, translocation, docking to specific membranes, and fusion (14, 15). Rab17 was originally described as an epithelial cell-specific protein that regulates polarized trafficking (16, 17). However, we showed previously that Rab17 is also expressed in mouse brain where it is involved in the regulation of dendritic morphogenesis and postsynaptic development of hippocampal neurons (18). Interestingly, Rab17 is the only reported somatodendritic-compartmentalized Rab, but its functional roles in dendritic trafficking remain unclear.
We investigated the possible relationship between Rab17 and AMPAR and KAR trafficking in hippocampal neurons. Rab17 knockdown did not affect trafficking of the AMPAR subunit GluA1, but it markedly reduced surface expression of the KAR subunit GluK2. Surprisingly, GluK2 and Rab17 do not co-localize. Rather, Rab17 is highly co-localized with Syntaxin-4 in somatodendritic compartments of developing neurons and in spines of mature neurons. Rab17 knockdown decreased Syntaxin-4 in dendrites and increased mis-targeted Syntaxin-4 in axons of developing neurons. Syntaxin-4 knockdown reduced GluK2 surface expression but did not affect GluA1. Furthermore, Syntaxin-4 knockdown prevented the increase in surface GluK2 induced by expression of a constitutively active form of Rab17. Taken together, these results suggest Rab17 mediates polarized trafficking of Syntaxin-4 and that dendritic Syntaxin-4 is important for surface insertion of GluK2-containing KARs but not GluA1-containing AMPARs in the somatodendritic compartment of rat hippocampal neurons.
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Antibodies
Commercially obtained antibodies were as follows: anti-c-Myc (9E10) mouse monoclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology); anti-calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II α (6G9) mouse monoclonal antibody, anti-GAPDH (6C5) mouse monoclonal antibody, and anti-MAP2 chick polyclonal antibody (Millipore Corp.); anti-GFP (clones 7.1 and 13.1) mouse monoclonal antibody (Roche Applied Science); anti-Syntaxin-4 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Synaptic Systems); IRDye®680RD/800CW-conjugated anti-mouse/rabbit IgG donkey antibody (LI-COR Biotechnology); horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse antibody (Sigma); and Cy2/Cy3/Cy5 or Alexa Fluor® 488/594/647-conjugated anti-mouse/rabbit/chick/sheep IgG donkey antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch). Anti-Rab17 rabbit polyclonal and anti-Myc sheep antibodies were prepared as described previously (18, 19).
Plasmid Construction
cDNAs encoding the mouse Syntaxin-1a, Syntaxin-4, or rat Syntaxin-4 were amplified from adult mouse brain, testis, or adult rat brain cDNA by PCR. Purified PCR products were directly inserted into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) or pCR-Blunt TOPO II vector (Invitrogen). The cDNAs were then subcloned into the BamHI/EcoRI site of the pCMV-Myc vector (20) to create pCMV-Myc-Stx1, pCMV-Myc-Stx4, and pCMV-Myc-ratStx4. Rab17-shRNA (18), rat Syntaxin4-shRNA-1 (21-base target site, 5′-caagtgtaactcaatgcagtc-3′), which was slightly modified as described in Jurado et al. (9), and rat Syntaxin4-shRNA-2 (19-base target site, 5′-agacaattcggcgactat-3′), which was described in Kennedy et al. (8), were subcloned into BamHI/HindIII site of pSilencer-CMV-EGFP vector (21) or BbsI/EcoRI site of pFIV-H1/U6-puro vector (System Bioscience) to create pSilencer-CMV-EGFP-shRab17, pFIV-shRab17, pFIV-shStx4-1, and pFIV-shStx4-2.
A mutant of Syntaxin-4 resistant to shRNA-1 (Syntaxin-4SR) was produced from mouse Syntaxin-4 cDNA as described previously (18) using the following oligonucleotides (substituted nucleotides are shown in uppercase): Syntaxin-4-SR-5′ primer, 5′-gcaatttgtcgagctcatcaaTaaAtgCaaTAGTatgcaAAGcgaataccgagagaagaatg-3′ and Syntaxin-4-SR-3′ primer, 5′-cattcttctctcggtattcgCTTtgcatACTAttGcaTttAttgatgagctcgacaaattgc-3′. The DNA of Syntaxin-4SR or Rab17SR (18) were subcloned into the BamHI/EcoRI site or BglII/EcoRI site of the pCMV-Myc vector to create pCMV-Myc-Stx4SR, pCMV-Stx4SR, and pCMV-Rab17SR. pEGFP-Rab17, pmCherry-Rab17, pEGFP-Rab17-Q77L, pCAG-Control, pCAG-Myc-Rab17-Q77L, pCMV-Myc-Stx2, and pCMV-Myc-Stx3 were prepared as described previously (18, 22). pCDNA3-Myc-GluA1, pCDNA3-Myc-GluK2, and pCDNA3-SEP-Myc-GluK2 were also prepared as described previously (11, 23). pEGFP-C2 was from Clontech.
Hippocampal Neuron Culture, Cell Line Culture, and Transfections
Rat embryonic hippocampal neuronal cultures were prepared from E18 Wistar rats. Neurons were then plated at a density of 75,000–100,000 onto 22-mm glass coverslips in a 6-well dish coated with 1 mg/ml poly-l-lysine (Sigma). The culture medium was composed of Neurobasal medium supplemented with 10% horse serum, 2% B27, 1% GlutaMAX, and 50 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin (all reagents from Invitrogen). On the 2nd day, the media were changed for Neurobasal medium supplemented with 2% B27 and 0.6% GlutaMAX, and 2.5 μm cytosine-β-d-arabinofuranoside (Sigma) was add to the medium after the 4th day of plating. Plasmid DNAs were transfected into the neurons by using Lipofectamine®2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
HEK293T cells and Neuro2A cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM, Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 50 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin. The cells were plated onto a 6-well plate. Plasmid DNAs were transfected into JET-PEI (Poly-Plus transfection) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Immunostaining
Neurons were fixed for 10 min with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), which was diluted by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) from 16% PFA (Electron Microscopy Sciences) at room temperature. After permeabilizing the cells with 0.1% Triton X-100 or 0.01% digitonin (for endogenous Syntaxin-4 staining) in PBS for 10 min, they were blocked with the blocking buffer (10% horse serum in PBS) for 1 h. The neurons were then immunostained for primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature or overnight at 4 °C after which they were incubated for 1 h with fluorescence-conjugated secondary IgG at room temperature. The neurons were examined for fluorescence with an LSM510 META confocal laser-scanning microscope (Zeiss), and the images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS software. Fluorescent intensity or the number of fluorescent dots were quantified with ImageJ software (version 1.42q; National Institutes of Health), and Pearson's correlation coefficient was determined manually by using the co-localization indices plug-in (24) to the ImageJ software program. Representative images of neurons are shown in each figure.
Immunoblotting
Cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and proteins transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore) by electroblotting. The blots were blocked with 0.3% skim milk and 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS, and after incubating them with a primary antibody, they were washed with PBS containing 0.2% Tween 20 and incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immunoreactive bands were detected by enhanced chemiluminescence or fluorescence with exposure to x-ray film or ODYSSEY® FC dual-imaging system (LI-COR Biotechnology) for quantifying the bands by using LI-COR Image Studio software.
Chem-LTP
Chem-LTP was induced as essentially described previously with slight modification (25). Briefly, at 18 DIV, neuronal culture was changed into extracellular solution (ECS: 150 mm NaCl, 2 mm CaCl2, 5 mm KCl, 10 mm HEPES (pH 7.4), 30 mm glucose) containing 0.5 μm tetrodotoxin. After 5 min in ECS, neurons were treated with 200 μm glycine (chem-LTP condition) or without glycine (basal condition) for 3 min in ECS and then incubated ECS containing tetrodotoxin without glycine for 5 min.
GluA1 and GluK2 Surface Expression
GluA1 and GluK2 were surface immunostained using Myc-GluA1, Myc-GluK2, or SEP-GluK2 as described previously with slight modifications (23, 25). Neurons were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS for 10 min under the nonpermeabilized conditions. For visualizing surface Myc-GluA1 or Myc-GluK2, the neurons were incubated with Myc antibody in the blocking buffer (1:500 dilution) for 20 min and then Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution) for 20 min. Surface SEP-GluK2 was visualized by incubating neurons with Alexa Fluor® 555-conjugated anti-GFP antibody (Invitrogen) in the blocking buffer (1:2000 dilution) for 5 min and then Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1000 dilution) for 1 h. The neurons were additionally fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 10 min and permeabilized, and they were subjected to immunostaining with anti-Myc antibody (1:200 dilution), anti-GFP antibody (1:200 dilution), and Cy5- or Cy2-conjugated secondary antibody again to visualize total levels. Surface expression levels were quantified by dividing the surface fluorescence intensity by the total fluorescence intensity.
Quantification of Somatic, Axonal, and Dendritic Distributions
Protein compartmentalization was quantified by setting image thresholds to exclude pixels outside the neuron. After subtracting the background intensity values from each image before quantification, the integrated fluorescence intensity of the protein in the entire neuron or just the region of soma, axon, or dendrite region was obtained. The proportion (%) of the protein in the region was calculated by dividing the fluorescence intensity of the region by the fluorescence intensity of the entire neuron.
Statistical Analyses
Student's unpaired t test was used to evaluate every result for statistical significance in comparison with the results obtained in control. The single asterisk and double asterisk in the bar charts indicate a t test p value of <0.05 and <0.0025, respectively, and comparisons that yielded a p value >0.05 are indicated by NS (not significant).
RESULTS
Rab17 Is Required for Surface Insertion of GluK2 but Not GluA1
We first investigated the effects of knocking down Rab17 on surface expression of the AMPAR subunit GluA1 under basal and glycine-stimulated chem-LTP conditions. Rab17-shRNA prevented expression of exogenously expressed mCherry-Rab17 and knocked down endogenous Rab17 by almost 80% in rat hippocampal neurons (levels compared with control-shRNA were 3.0 ± 2.3% for mCherry-Rab17 and 21.6 ± 31.1% for endogenous Rab17) (Fig. 1, A–D).
Rab17 knockdown did not significantly affect surface levels of Myc-GluA1 under basal (Rab17-shRNA, 79.8 ± 14.1% of the control) or chem-LTP conditions (control-shRNA, 216.0 ± 10.6%; Rab17-shRNA, 194.3 ± 9.5% compared with basal levels in control neurons) in 18 DIV hippocampal neurons (Fig. 1, E and F). These results indicate that Rab17 is not involved in GluA1 trafficking in rat hippocampal neurons.
We next examined whether Rab17 is involved KAR surface expression. Because it has been reported that the KAR subunit GluK2 is present at both the pre- and postsynapse (4), we assessed the ratio of surface distribution of Myc-GluK2 in the soma, dendrites, and axons of 14 DIV hippocampal neurons. Myc-GluK2 was predominantly surface-expressed in the soma and dendrite with much less present in axons (ratio of surface-expressed Myc-GluK2 50.7 ± 1.5% in dendrite, 3.2 ± 0.9% in axon, and 46.6 ± 3.6% in soma; Fig. 2, A and B). Thus, almost all of the surface signal of Myc-GluK2 can be attributed to the somatodendritic compartment under these conditions. Knockdown of Rab17 dramatically reduced GluK2 surface expression in the rat hippocampal neurons at 14 DIV (to 14.7 ± 4.1% of the control neurons; Fig. 2, C and D). This loss was completely rescued by re-expression of shRNA-resistant mutant Rab17SR (to 106.7 ± 28.8% of the control neurons) (Fig. 2, C and D).
Interestingly, Rab17 knockdown did not change the total fluorescence intensity of GluK2 in the dendrites (to 103.0 ± 24.7% of the control neurons; Fig. 2, E and F). Furthermore, Rab17 did not co-localize with GluK2 in dendrites (Fig. 2G). Thus, Rab17 is involved in GluK2 surface expression but is not required for the transport of GluK2 from the soma to the dendrite.
Rab17 Co-localizes with Syntaxin-4 in Hippocampal Neurons
These data suggest that Rab17 regulates GluK2 surface expression indirectly via some intermediate protein(s). It has been reported that Syntaxin-4, but not Syntaxin-1, Syntaxin-2, or Syntaxin-3, localizes at the postsynaptic plasma membrane in hippocampal neurons (8). We therefore assessed co-localization of Rab17 with each of these Syntaxin isoforms. First, we checked the localization of Myc-tagged Syntaxin-1, -2, -3, and -4 in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons. Myc-Syntaxin-1 was present in the soma and at axon tips but was rarely detected in the axonal shaft or in the dendritic shaft or tip (Fig. 3A, left panels). Myc-Syntaxin-2 and Myc-Syntaxin-3 were present in all compartments (Fig. 3A, middle panels). Myc-Syntaxin-4 mainly localized at the soma, dendritic shaft, and tip, with no detectable staining in axons (Fig. 3A, right panels). Rab17 confined to the somatodendritic compartment (18) and EGFP-Rab17 is highly co-localized with Myc-Syntaxin-4 but not with Syntaxin-1, Syntaxin-2, or Syntaxin-3 in the soma in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons (Fig. 3B). Pearson's correlation coefficients between Rab17 and the syntaxin paralogues were as follows: Syntaxin-1, 0.15 ± 0.03; Syntaxin-2, 0.08 ± 0.03; Syntaxin-3, 0.01 ± 0.02; and Syntaxin-4, 0.45 ± 0.06 (Fig. 3C).Importantly, there was also extensive co-localization between endogenous Rab17 also co-localized with Myc-Syntaxin-4 at the soma (Fig. 3D).
Rab17 and Myc-Syntaxin-4, but not Myc-Syntaxin-1, -2, or -3, puncta also co-localize in the dendrites (Fig. 4, A and B). Because Rab17 accumulates at dendritic spines in mature hippocampal neurons (18), we next investigated possible co-localization with Myc-Syntaxin-1, -2, -3, and -4 at spines in 21 DIV mature neurons. As shown in Fig. 4C, Myc-Syntaxin-1 and Myc-Syntaxin-2 were only present in the dendritic shaft (Fig. 4C, top rows). Myc-Syntaxin-3 was present in the dendritic shaft, and there was some overlap with Rab17-positive protuberances (Fig. 4C, 3rd row). In contrast, Myc-Syntaxin-4 displayed strong co-localization at the Rab17-positive protuberances with relatively little present in the dendritic shaft (Fig. 4C, bottom row). Furthermore, the Rab17 and Myc-Syntaxin-4 signals co-localize with the postsynaptic spine marker calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II α (Fig. 4D), indicating that they accumulate at spines.
Rab17 Is Required for the Polarized Distribution of Syntaxin-4 in Developing Hippocampal Neurons
We next investigated whether Rab17 is involved in Syntaxin-4 trafficking. As expected, Rab17 knockdown did not alter the localizations of Myc-Syntaxin-1, Syntaxin-2, or Syntaxin-3 in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons (dendritic Myc-Syntaxin-1, 5.7 ± 1.9 and 5.2 ± 1.5% in control and Rab17-knockdown neurons, respectively; dendritic Myc-Syntaxin-2, 44.8 ± 4.8 and 44.0 ± 4.5% in control and Rab17-knockdown neurons, respectively; dendritic Myc-Syntaxin-3, 53.8 ± 3.9 and 52.9 ± 6.3% in control neurons and Rab17-knockdown neurons, respectively; Fig. 5, A–E). In stark contrast, however, Rab17 knockdown markedly reduced dendritic Myc-Syntaxin-4 (Myc-Syntaxin-4 in the dendrites, 29.7 ± 3.5% of the control neurons versus 9.0 ± 2.0% of the Rab17-knockdown neurons) (Fig. 5, D and E). Additionally, Rab17 knockdown significantly reduced the dendritic and increased axonal localization of Myc-Syntaxin-4 (Myc-Syntaxin-4 ratio between dendrites and axons = 97.6 ± 1.2 and 2.4 ± 1.2% in control neurons and 31.2 ± 4.6 and 68.8 ± 4.9% in the Rab17-knockdown neurons; Fig. 5, D and F).
We used immunocytochemistry to define the effects of Rab17 knockdown on endogenous Syntaxin-4. To validate the specificity of the anti-Syntaxin-4 antibody in immunostaining, we constructed Stx4-shRNA-1 (9) and Stx4-shRNA-2 (8) to specifically knock down Syntaxin-4. Both shRNAs dramatically decreased both exogenously expressed Myc-Syntaxin-4 (Fig. 6A) and endogenous Syntaxin-4 levels in Neuro2A cells (Stx4-shRNA-1 reduced endogenous Syntaxin-4 levels to 27.6 ± 3.2% and Stx4-shRNA-2 reduced levels to 48.7 ± 6.3% compared with control-shRNA; Fig. 6, B and C). We also checked that both shRNAs were effective in hippocampal neurons (Stx4-shRNA-1 reduced levels to 16.0 ± 29.0% and Stx4-shRNA-2 reduced levels to 19.0 ± 22.4% compared with control; Fig. 6, D and E). Furthermore, enhanced anti-Syntaxin-4 antibody immunostaining was observed in hippocampal neurons expressing Myc-Syntaxin-4 (Fig. 6F), and decreased staining was observed in Syntaxin-4 knockdown neurons (Stx4-shRNA-1 reduced levels to 27.5 ± 6.3% compared with control-shRNA; Fig. 6, G and H). These results rigorously characterize the specificity and utility of the anti-Syntaxin-4 antibody and validate its use to monitor changes in endogenous Syntaxin-4 in neurons.
Interestingly, Rab17 knockdown resulted in the somatic accumulation of endogenous Syntaxin-4 with a consequent reduction in dendrites in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons (Syntaxin-4 in the dendrites, 26.0 ± 3.1% of the control neurons versus 14.1 ± 2.8% of the Rab17-knockdown neurons) (Fig. 6, I and J). However, unlike Myc-Syntaxin-4, endogenous Syntaxin-4 was not mis-targeted to axons in the Rab17 knockdown neurons (Fig. 6I). These results demonstrate that Rab17 is required for the translocation of Syntaxin-4 to the dendrites in hippocampal neurons.
Syntaxin-4 Is Necessary for GluK2 but not GluA1 Surface Insertion
Syntaxin-4 knockdown also markedly reduced Myc-GluK2 surface expression in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons (11.6 ± 2.5 and 40.5 ± 6.2% of control surface Myc-GluK2 for Stx4-shRNA-1 and Stx4-shRNA-2, respectively; Fig. 7, A and B). Moreover, GluK2 surface expression in the combined Syntaxin-4- and Rab17-knockdown neurons is almost the same as knockdown of Syntaxin-4 alone (Stx4-shRNA-1 and Rab17-shRNA, 10.1 ± 2.3% of Myc-GluK2 of the control neurons). Surface expression of GluK2 in Syntaxin-4-knockdown neurons was rescued by re-expression of shRNA-resistant Syntaxin-4SR (Stx4-shRNA-1 and Syntaxin-4SR, 69.2 ± 10.5% of Myc-GluK2 of the control neurons). As expected, knockdown of Syntaxin-4 did not significantly alter surface expression of the AMPAR subunit Myc-GluA1 at 11 DIV (Stx4-shRNA-1, 80.2 ± 10.0% of Myc-GluA1 of the control neurons; Fig. 7, C and D). These results are consistent with Rab17 and Syntaxin-4 working via the same pathway to regulate GluK2 surface expression but are not involved in GluA1 surface expression.
Constitutively Active Rab17 Promotes KAR Surface Expression by Enhancing Dendritic Localization of Syntaxin-4
Rab17 is translocated from the soma to the dendrites in a GTP-dependent manner (26). Furthermore, expression of a constitutively active form of Rab17 (Rab17-Q77L) significantly enhances dendrite growth in early stage neurons (18). We therefore investigated whether constitutively active Rab17 increases dendritic Syntaxin-4. Overexpression of EGFP-Rab17-Q77L enhances dendritic, but not axonal, levels of Syntaxin-4 in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons (Myc-Syntaxin-4 in the dendrites; EGFP, 34.2 ± 3.9% versus EGFP-Rab17-Q77L, 59.6 ± 3.7%; Fig. 8, A and B). We also tested whether Rab17 promotes GluK2 membrane insertion in developing neurons. Constitutively active Rab17 increased surface expression of Super-ecliptic pHluorin (SEP)-tagged GluK2 (Rab17-Q77L, 342.0 ± 36.4% of SEP-GluK2 of the control neurons; Fig. 8, C and D). Moreover, this enhancement was almost completely blocked by co-transfection with Syntaxin-4-shRNA (Rab17-Q77L and Stx4-shRNA-1, 122.5 ± 19.2% of Myc-GluK2 of the control neurons; Fig. 8, C and D). These data indicate that Syntaxin-4 works downstream of Rab17 to the surface insertion of GluK2.
Syntaxin-4 Is Not Involved in Dendrite Morphogenesis at Developing Hippocampal Neurons
Because Rab17 regulates dendritic morphogenesis in developing mouse hippocampal neurons (18), we examined whether Syntaxin-4 is also involved in this process. Knockdown of Rab17 reduced the total dendrite length and number of dendrite branches (to 36.7 ± 10.1 and 58.6 ± 10.2%, respectively, of the control; Fig. 9, A–C) in 11 DIV hippocampal neurons, but knockdown of Syntaxin-4 did not affect both total dendrite length and number of dendrite branches. Thus, unlike Rab17, Syntaxin-4 does not appear to play a role in dendrite morphogenesis in developing hippocampal neurons.
DISCUSSION
Our results identify Rab17 as an important regulator of GluK2-containing KAR but not GluA1-containing AMPAR surface expression in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. We show that Rab17 is involved in the polarized localization of Syntaxin-4, which in turn regulates GluK2 trafficking. As represented schematically in Fig. 10, we interpret these data to suggest that Syntaxin-4 is a cargo molecule of Rab17-containing vesicles and that it is an important determinant of KAR insertion in dendritic membrane.
Several Rab proteins have been reported to directly transport AMPAR- or KAR-containing vesicles (10, 12). However, because Rab17 is the only reported dendrite-specific Rab and is involved in dendritic morphogenesis and postsynaptic development (18), we tested whether it is also involved in receptor forward trafficking. We showed that the AMPAR subunits GluA1 and GluA2 do not co-localize with Rab17 (18). Similarly, here we show that the KAR subunit GluK2 also does not co-localize with Rab17 (Fig. 2G), indicating that AMPAR- or KAR-containing vesicles do not contain Rab17. Nonetheless, we show that Rab17 and Syntaxin-4 contribute to GluK2 (but not GluA1) surface insertion at the dendrite in developing hippocampal neurons. Given the dynamic regulation of KAR surface expression (13, 23, 27), we expect that future studies will investigate the activity dependence of Rab17 and Syntaxin-4 involvement in processes.
Because GluK2 is predominantly surface-expressed in dendrites in our experiments (Fig. 2, A and B), we have not determined whether Rab17 and Syntaxin-4 also regulate presynaptic KAR. Extensive future studies will be necessary to determine the transport, insertion, and internalization mechanism of AMPARs and KARs at the dendrite and axon.
Syntaxin-4 is present in dendritic spines in hippocampal neurons (8), but there are significant discrepancies between reports regarding the physiological function of Syntaxin-4 and AMPAR regulation. Kennedy et al. (8) used fluorophore-tagged transferrin receptor (TfR-SEP) as a marker for GluA1 trafficking and reported that Syntaxin-4 knockdown or overexpression of a dominant-negative Syntaxin-4 prevents activity-dependent surface insertion of TfR-SEP in spines and blocks LTP. Based on these observations, they concluded that Syntaxin-4 is involved in the synaptic surface insertion of AMPAR. In direct contrast however, Jurado et al. (9) state that knockdown of Syntaxin-3, but not of Syntaxin-4, inhibits surface insertion of endogenous GluA1 and blocks LTP (9). In agreement with Jurado et al. (9), our data indicate that Syntaxin-4 is not involved in AMPAR trafficking. Nonetheless, because KARs are implicated in postsynaptic LTP (28), Syntaxin-4 may still contribute to this process.
We interpret our results to suggest that Syntaxin-4 is a cargo molecule of Rab17-containing vesicles, which are specifically sorted for polarized trafficking to the dendrite in developing hippocampal neurons. Although we detected mis-trafficked axonal Myc-Syntaxin-4 in Rab17 knockdown neurons (Fig. 5, D and F), we did not observe similar mislocalization of endogenous Syntaxin-4 (Fig. 6I). One explanation for this is that the comparatively low levels of mislocalized endogenous Syntaxin-4 in axons is rapidly degraded, which occur less quickly for the much higher levels of overexpressed Myc-Syntaxin-4. However, future studies will be necessary to determine whether this is correct and define the mechanisms underlying Syntaxin-4 polarization.
Syntaxin-4 is known to be involved in recycling via the endosomal pathway (29, 30), and Rab17 co-localizes with Rab11 in dendritic puncta (18). Furthermore, Syntaxin-4 directly interacts with GTP-bound form of Rab4 (31). Thus, an attractive hypothesis is that Rab17 directly interacts with Syntaxin-4 for sorting into the dendrite-specific recycling endosome at the soma.
Neurons lacking Rab17 have fewer and shorter dendrites and are deficient in dendritic filopodia and spines (18), and kainate stimulation alters dendrite length, branching, filopodia number, and elongation (32–34). However, Syntaxin-4 is not involved in dendrite morphogenesis (Fig. 9). Therefore, we conclude that Syntaxin-4-mediated GluK2 trafficking is not involved in Rab17-dependent dendrite morphogenesis. We speculate that not Syntaxin-4 but instead other cargo molecules of Rab17 or membrane additions from Rab17-containing vesicles to the plasma membrane are important for dendritic morphology in developing hippocampal neurons.
In conclusion, Syntaxin-4 is a cargo molecule of Rab17 in hippocampal dendrites, and both Rab17 and Syntaxin-4 regulate surface insertion of GluK2.
Acknowledgments
We thank Philip Rubin for technical assistance and members of the Henley Laboratory and the Fukuda Laboratory for valuable discussions.
This work was supported by a grant from the Uehara Memorial Foundation (to Y. M.), grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Technology of Japan, the Daiichi-Sankyo Foundation of Life Science (to M. F.), the European Research Council, the Medical Research Council, and the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (to J. M. H.).
- AMPAR
- AMPA-type glutamate receptor
- chem-LTP
- chemically induced LTP
- DIV
- days in vitro
- ECS
- extracellular solution
- EGFP
- enhanced green fluorescent protein
- KAR
- kainate-type glutamate receptor
- LTP
- long term potentiation
- PFA
- paraformaldehyde
- SEP
- Super-ecliptic pHluorin
- shRNA
- short hairpin RNA
- SR
- shRNA-resistant.
REFERENCES
- 1. Wollmuth L. P., Sobolevsky A. I. (2004) Structure and gating of the glutamate receptor ion channel. Trends Neurosci. 27, 321–328 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Henley J. M., Barker E. A., Glebov O. O. (2011) Routes, destinations and delays: recent advances in AMPA receptor trafficking. Trends Neurosci. 34, 258–268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Malinow R., Malenka R. C. (2002) AMPA receptor trafficking and synaptic plasticity. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 25, 103–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Jaskolski F., Coussen F., Mulle C. (2005) Subcellular localization and trafficking of kainate receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 26, 20–26 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Contractor A., Mulle C., Swanson G. T. (2011) Kainate receptors coming of age: milestones of two decades of research. Trends Neurosci. 34, 154–163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Matsuda S., Miura E., Matsuda K., Kakegawa W., Kohda K., Watanabe M., Yuzaki M. (2008) Accumulation of AMPA receptors in autophagosomes in neuronal axons lacking adaptor protein AP-4. Neuron 57, 730–745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Setou M., Seog D.-H., Tanaka Y., Kanai Y., Takei Y., Kawagishi M., Hirokawa N. (2002) Glutamate-receptor-interacting protein GRIP1 directly steers kinesin to dendrites. Nature 417, 83–87 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kennedy M. J., Davison I. G., Robinson C. G., Ehlers M. D. (2010) Syntaxin-4 defines a domain for activity-dependent exocytosis in dendritic spines. Cell 141, 524–535 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Jurado S., Goswami D., Zhang Y., Molina A. J., Südhof T. C., Malenka R. C. (2013) LTP requires a unique postsynaptic SNARE fusion machinery. Neuron 77, 542–558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Park M., Penick E. C., Edwards J. G., Kauer J. A., Ehlers M. D. (2004) Recycling endosomes supply AMPA receptors for LTP. Science 305, 1972–1975 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Rocca D. L., Amici M., Antoniou A., Blanco Suarez E., Halemani N., Murk K., McGarvey J., Jaafari N., Mellor J. R., Collingridge G. L., Hanley J. G. (2013) The small GTPase Arf1 modulates Arp2/3-mediated actin polymerization via PICK1 to regulate synaptic plasticity. Neuron 79, 293–307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Selak S., Paternain A. V., Aller M. I., Aller I. M., Picó E., Rivera R., Lerma J. (2009) A role for SNAP25 in internalization of kainate receptors and synaptic plasticity. Neuron 63, 357–371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. González-González I. M., Henley J. M. (2013) Postsynaptic kainate receptor recycling and surface expression are regulated by metabotropic autoreceptor signalling. Traffic 14, 810–822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Fukuda M. (2008) Regulation of secretory vesicle traffic by Rab small GTPases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65, 2801–2813 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Stenmark H. (2009) Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 513–525 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Hunziker W., Peters P. J. (1998) Rab17 localizes to recycling endosomes and regulates receptor-mediated transcytosis in epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 15734–15741 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Zacchi P., Stenmark H., Parton R. G., Orioli D., Lim F., Giner A., Mellman I., Zerial M., Murphy C. (1998) Rab17 regulates membrane trafficking through apical recycling endosomes in polarized epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 140, 1039–1053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mori Y., Matsui T., Furutani Y., Yoshihara Y., Fukuda M. (2012) Small GTPase Rab17 regulates dendritic morphogenesis and postsynaptic development of hippocampal neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 8963–8973 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Konopacki F. A., Jaafari N., Rocca D. L., Wilkinson K. A., Chamberlain S., Rubin P., Kantamneni S., Mellor J. R., Henley J. M. (2011) Agonist-induced PKC phosphorylation regulates GluK2 SUMOylation and kainate receptor endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 19772–19777 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kobayashi H., Fukuda M. (2012) Rab35 regulates Arf6 activity through centaurin-β2 (ACAP2) during neurite outgrowth. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2235–2243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Mori Y., Matsui T., Omote D., Fukuda M. (2013) Small GTPase Rab39A interacts with UACA and regulates the retinoic acid-induced neurite morphology of Neuro2A cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 435, 113–119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yatsu A., Ohbayashi N., Tamura K., Fukuda M. (2013) Syntaxin-3 is required for melanosomal localization of Tyrp1 in melanocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 133, 2237–2246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Martin S., Bouschet T., Jenkins E. L., Nishimune A., Henley J. M. (2008) Bidirectional regulation of kainate receptor surface expression in hippocampal neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 36435–36440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Nakamura K., Watakabe A., Hioki H., Fujiyama F., Tanaka Y., Yamamori T., Kaneko T. (2007) Transiently increased colocalization of vesicular glutamate transporters 1 and 2 at single axon terminals during postnatal development of mouse neocortex: a quantitative analysis with correlation coefficient. Eur. J. Neurosci. 26, 3054–3067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Jaafari N., Konopacki F. A., Owen T. F., Kantamneni S., Rubin P., Craig T. J., Wilkinson K. A., Henley J. M. (2013) SUMOylation is required for glycine-induced increases in AMPA receptor surface expression (ChemLTP) in hippocampal neurons. PLoS ONE 8, e52345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mori Y., Matsui T., Fukuda M. (2013) Rabex-5 protein regulates dendritic localization of small GTPase Rab17 and neurite morphogenesis in hippocampal neurons. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 9835–9847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Feligioni M., Holman D., Haglerod C., Davanger S., Henley J. M. (2006) Ultrastructural localisation and differential agonist-induced regulation of AMPA and kainate receptors present at the presynaptic active zone and postsynaptic density. J. Neurochem. 99, 549–560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Contractor A., Swanson G., Heinemann S. F. (2001) Kainate receptors are involved in short- and long-term plasticity at mossy fiber synapses in the hippocampus. Neuron 29, 209–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Band A. M., Ali H., Vartiainen M. K., Welti S., Lappalainen P., Olkkonen V. M., Kuismanen E. (2002) Endogenous plasma membrane t-SNARE syntaxin 4 is present in rab11 positive endosomal membranes and associates with cortical actin cytoskeleton. FEBS Lett. 531, 513–519 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Veale K. J., Offenhäuser C., Whittaker S. P., Estrella R. P., Murray R. Z. (2010) Recycling endosome membrane incorporation into the leading edge regulates lamellipodia formation and macrophage migration. Traffic 11, 1370–1379 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Li L., Omata W., Kojima I., Shibata H. (2001) Direct interaction of Rab4 with syntaxin 4. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 5265–5273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Suzuki F., Makiura Y., Guilhem D., Sørensen J. C., Onteniente B. (1997) Correlated axonal sprouting and dendritic spine formation during kainate-induced neuronal morphogenesis in the dentate gyrus of adult mice. Exp. Neurol. 145, 203–213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Hasbani M. J., Schlief M. L., Fisher D. A., Goldberg M. P. (2001) Dendritic spines lost during glutamate receptor activation reemerge at original sites of synaptic contact. J. Neurosci. 21, 2393–2403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Monnerie H., Le Roux P. D. (2006) Glutamate receptor agonist kainate enhances primary dendrite number and length from immature mouse cortical neurons in vitro. J. Neurosci. Res. 83, 944–956 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]