Abstract
Bordetella bronchiseptica swine isolate KM22 has been used in experimental infections of swine as a model of clinical B. bronchiseptica infections within swine herds and to study host-to-host transmission. Here we report the draft genome sequence of KM22.
GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT
Bordetella bronchiseptica colonization is widespread in swine populations and is an important contributor to respiratory disease in pigs. In young pigs, it is a primary cause of bronchopneumonia and in older pigs contributes to secondary pneumonia. It is the primary etiologic agent of nonprogressive atrophic rhinitis, a mild to moderately severe reversible condition, and it promotes colonization by toxigenic strains of Pasteurella multocida, which leads to severe progressive atrophic rhinitis (1–3). In pigs exhibiting pneumonia, B. bronchiseptica is often isolated in combination with other pathogens (3, 4). It is well documented that co-infection with B. bronchiseptica increases colonization and exacerbates the severity of disease caused by both viral and bacterial pathogens, including swine influenza virus, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, porcine respiratory coronavirus, Haemophilus parasuis, P. multocida, and Streptococcus suis (3, 5–12).
The virulent B. bronchiseptica swine isolate KM22 was originally isolated in Hungary in 1993 from a swine herd with atrophic rhinitis. Based on multilocus sequence type (MLST) analysis, KM22 is sequence type (ST) 7, in Clonal Complex 1 of an MLST-based Bordetella phylogeny (13) and harbors a ribotype (14) and pertactin repeat region variant (15) shared with the majority of strains isolated from swine. KM22 has been successfully used by our laboratory to develop a reproducible swine respiratory disease model reflective of clinical B. bronchiseptica infections within swine herds and host-to-host transmission (2, 5–10, 16–19). Here we report the draft genome sequence of KM22 in our continued efforts to investigate the pathogenesis and transmission of B. bronchiseptica in swine.
DNA for whole genome sequencing was prepared from bacteria grown overnight at 37°C in Stainer-Scholte (SS) broth and genomic DNA was prepared using a High Pure PCR template preparation kit (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed using a combination of Roche GS (FLX and FLXplus) and Illumina GAIIx sequencing. The use of two Roche GS (FLX and FLXplus) genomic shotgun libraries and sequencing resulted in the generation of 891,959 reads with an average length of 248 bp (for FLX) and 1,209 bp (for FLXplus). Illumina GAIIx sequencing resulted in a total of 3,474,442 paired-end sequencing reads of 72-bp length from a template of 239 bp average insert size. The genome was assembled using MIRA v3.4.0 and the Roche GS De Novo Assembler v2.6 to achieve 87× total genome coverage through the assembly of Roche GS FLX shotgun, GS FLXplus shotgun, and Illumina GAIIx paired-end sequencing reads. B. bronchiseptica RB50 was subsequently used as a reference to further guide closing genome gaps via manual editing. Gap5 from the Staden package was used as the assembly editor resulting in a final assembly of 46 contigs consisting of a maximum length of 679,114 bp, a minimum length of 686 bp, an N50 contig size of 277,171 bp, a mean coverage of 87×, and summing to a total genome size of 5,119,729 bp. Automated annotation using Prokka v1.7 (20) identified a total of 4,853 predicted protein coding sequences (CDSs), 3 rRNA operons, 1 transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), and 54 tRNAs.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The Illunina HiSeq short read sequence has been deposited at the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession no. ERS027415. This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession no. JNHR00000000. The version described in this paper is the first version, JNHR01000000.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Tibor Magyar (Institute for Veterinary Medical Research, Centre for Agricultural Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary) for kindly providing B. bronchiseptica strain KM22. We additionally thank the support of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute core sequencing team for their assistance and David Alt (USDA/ARS/National Animal Disease Center) for his assistance.
The work described here was funded in part by the Wellcome Trust through core funding grant 098051 for the Sanger Institute Pathogen Variation Group.
Mention of trade names or commercial products in this article is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Footnotes
Citation Nicholson TL, Shore SM, Bayles DO, Register KB, Kingsley RA. 2014. Draft genome sequence of the Bordetella bronchiseptica swine isolate KM22. Genome Announc. 2(4):e00670-14. doi:10.1128/genomeA.00670-14.
REFERENCES
- 1. Magyar T, Lax AJ. 2002. Atrophic rhinitis, p 169–197 In Brogden KA, Guthmiller J. (ed), Polymicrobial Diseases. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Chanter N, Magyar T, Rutter JM. 1989. Interactions between Bordetella bronchiseptica and toxigenic Pasteurella multocida in atrophic rhinitis of pigs. Res. Vet. Sci. 47:48–53 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Brockmeier SL, Register KB, Nicholson TL, Loving CL. 2012. Bordetellosis, p 670–708 In Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW. (ed), Diseases of swine, 10th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, United Kingdom [Google Scholar]
- 4. Palzer A, Ritzmann M, Wolf G, Heinritzi K. 2008. Associations between pathogens in healthy pigs and pigs with pneumonia. Vet. Rec. 162:267–271. 10.1136/vr.162.9.267 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brockmeier SL, Palmer MV, Bolin SR. 2000. Effects of intranasal inoculation of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, Bordetella bronchiseptica, or a combination of both organisms in pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 61:892–899. 10.2460/ajvr.2000.61.892 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Loving CL, Brockmeier SL, Vincent AL, Palmer MV, Sacco RE, Nicholson TL. 2010. Influenza virus coinfection with Bordetella bronchiseptica enhances bacterial colonization and host responses exacerbating pulmonary lesions. Microb. Pathog. 49:237–245. 10.1016/j.micpath.2010.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Brockmeier SL, Palmer MV, Bolin SR, Rimler RB. 2001. Effects of intranasal inoculation with Bordetella bronchiseptica, porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus, or a combination of both organisms on subsequent infection with Pasteurella multocida in pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62:521–525. 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Brockmeier SL, Loving CL, Nicholson TL, Palmer MV. 2008. Coinfection of pigs with porcine respiratory coronavirus and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Vet. Microbiol. 128:36–47. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.09.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Brockmeier SL. 2004. Prior infection with Bordetella bronchiseptica increases nasal colonization by Haemophilus parasuis in swine. Vet. Microbiol. 99:75–78. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Brockmeier SL, Register KB. 2007. Expression of the dermonecrotic toxin by Bordetella bronchiseptica is not necessary for predisposing to infection with toxigenic Pasteurella multocida. Vet. Microbiol. 125:284–289. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.05.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Vecht U, Arends JP, van der Molen EJ, van Leengoed LA. 1989. Differences in virulence between two strains of Streptococcus suis type II after experimentally induced infection of newborn germ-free pigs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 50:1037–1043 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Vecht U, Wisselink HJ, van Dijk JE, Smith HE. 1992. Virulence of Streptococcus suis type 2 strains in newborn germfree pigs depends on phenotype. Infect. Immun. 60:550–556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Diavatopoulos DA, Cummings CA, Schouls LM, Brinig MM, Relman DA, Mooi FR. 2005. Bordetella pertussis, the causative agent of whooping cough, evolved from a distinct, human-associated lineage of B. bronchiseptica. PLoS Pathog. 1:e45. 10.1371/journal.ppat.0010045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Register KB, Magyar T. 1999. Optimized ribotyping protocol applied to Hungarian Bordetella bronchiseptica isolates: identification of two novel ribotypes. Vet. Microbiol. 69:277–285. 10.1016/S0378-1135(99)00118-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Register KB. 2001. Novel genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in Bordetella bronchiseptica pertactin. Infect. Immun. 69:1917–1921. 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1917-1921.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Brockmeier SL, Lager KM. 2002. Experimental airborne transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Bordetella bronchiseptica. Vet. Microbiol. 89:267–275. 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00204-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Nicholson TL, Brockmeier SL, Loving CL. 2009. Contribution of Bordetella bronchiseptica filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin to respiratory disease in swine. Infect. Immun. 77:2136–2146. 10.1128/IAI.01379-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Nicholson TL, Brockmeier SL, Loving CL, Register KB, Kehrli ME, Jr, Shore SM. 2014. The Bordetella bronchiseptica type III secretion system is required for persistence and disease severity but not transmission in swine. Infect. Immun. 82:1092–1103. 10.1128/IAI.01115-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Nicholson TL, Brockmeier SL, Loving CL, Register KB, Kehrli ME, Jr, Stibitz SE, Shore SM. 2012. Phenotypic modulation of the virulent Bvg phase is not required for pathogenesis and transmission of Bordetella bronchiseptica in swine. Infect. Immun. 80:1025–1036. 10.1128/IAI.06016-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Seemann T. 18 March 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]