Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2014 Jul 25;9(7):e102340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102340

Redox Proteomics Changes in the Fungal Pathogen Trichosporon asahii on Arsenic Exposure: Identification of Protein Responses to Metal-Induced Oxidative Stress in an Environmentally-Sampled Isolate

Sidra Ilyas 1, Abdul Rehman 1, Ana Coelho Varela 2, David Sheehan 3,*
Editor: Paul A Cobine4
PMCID: PMC4111368  PMID: 25062082

Abstract

Trichosporon asahii is a yeast pathogen implicated in opportunistic infections. Cultures of an isolate collected from industrial wastewater were exposed for 2 days to 100 mg/L sodium arsenite (NaAsO2) and cadmium (CdCl2). Both metals reduced glutathione transferase (GST) activity but had no effect on superoxide dismutase or catalase. NaAsO2 exposure increased glutathione reductase activity while CdCl2 had no effect. Protein thiols were labeled with 5-iodoacetamido fluorescein followed by one dimensional electrophoresis which revealed extensive protein thiol oxidation in response to CdCl2 treatment but thiol reduction in response to NaAsO2. Two dimensional electrophoresis analyses showed that the intensity of some protein spots was enhanced on treatment as judged by SameSpots image analysis software. In addition, some spots showed decreased IAF fluorescence suggesting thiol oxidation. Selected spots were excised and tryptic digested for identification by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. Twenty unique T. asahii proteins were identified of which the following proteins were up-regulated in response to NaAsO2: 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase, phospholipase B, alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase, ATP synthase alpha chain, 20S proteasome beta-type subunit Pre3p and the hypothetical proteins A1Q1_08001, A1Q2_03020, A1Q1_06950, A1Q1_06913. In addition, the following showed decreased thiol-associated fluorescence consistent with thiol oxidation; aconitase; aldehyde reductase I; phosphoglycerate kinase; translation elongation factor 2; heat shock protein 70 and hypothetical protein A1Q2_04745. Some proteins showed both increase in abundance coupled with decrease in IAF fluorescence; 3-hydroxyisobutyryl- CoA hydrolase; homoserine dehydrogenase Hom6 and hypothetical proteins A1Q2_03020 and A1Q1_00754. Targets implicated in redox response included 10 unique metabolic enzymes, heat shock proteins, a component of the 20S proteasome and translation elongation factor 2. These data suggest extensive proteomic alterations in response to metal-induced oxidative stress in T. asahii. Amino acid metabolism, protein folding and degradation are principally affected.

Introduction

Trichosporon asahii is an emerging yeast pathogen, which is increasingly reported in nosocomial infections, in fatal opportunistic infections and in summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis [1][3]. It occupies a wide variety of environmental niches [3][6]. Some yeasts such as Trichoderma spp. and Rhodotorula spp. are known to be able to accumulate and survive exposure to heavy metals [7][10]. Yeasts have evolved impressive antioxidant defense systems, which include glutathione transferase (GST) [11], glutathione reductase (GR), catalase (CAT) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities. Despite the known metal-resistance potential of many yeasts [7][10]; [12], for most species only limited information is available about proteomic changes attendant on metal accumulation. We are interested in yeasts of pollutant-rich wastewaters from the textile industry and serendipitously cultured an isolate of T. asahii from this source. Because of its metal-tolerance, growing clinical importance [1][3] and the recent availability of its genome [13], [14], we felt that this isolate might be an attractive and topical target for proteomic profiling of heavy metal response systems in T. asahii.

Molecular oxygen is essential for aerobic life-forms but it can also produce highly toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) [15][18]. Heavy metals (e.g. Cd) and metalloids (e.g. As), which are common environmental pollutants can contribute to ROS generation in yeast cells [19][23]. Proteins absorb ∼70% of ROS causing reversible and irreversible covalent changes to amino acid side-chains of proteins that can complicate the proteome [17], [18], [24][26]. For example, the cysteine thiol group (-SH) can become reversibly oxidized to sulphenic acid (-SOH) or disulphides (-S–S- or -S–S–glutathione) and irreversibly modified to sulphinic (-SO2H) or sulphonic (-SO3H) acids [18], [27]. Amino acid side chains can also be modified forming aldehyde or ketone groups (protein carbonylation), which can lead to protein aggregation, inactivation or degradation [28], [29]. These effects have been extensively investigated in systems such as bacteria, yeast, mammalian tissues and cell cultures [29][32]. Environmental pollutants such as metals, pesticides, endocrine disruptors and nanomaterials are known to trigger oxidative stress in a range of organisms [33][36]. This may be due to direct production of ROS from reactions such as the Fenton reaction [18], damage to mitochondria leading to leakage of ROS [17] or changes in redox signalling resulting from stress pathways [36]. Such oxidation can be detected by measuring lipid peroxidation or oxidation of proteins. Recently, redox proteomics has proved an especially robust approach to detection of oxidative stress effects on proteins in environmental pollution scenarios [37][39].

Environmental pollutants such as Cd and As are considered highly toxic as they have a high affinity for proteins and can alter protein structure and function [40], [41]. They can either bind directly to protein -SH groups or indirectly generate oxidative modifications within yeast cells [42][44], which cause changes in proteins as sulphur-containing residues are so susceptible to oxidation [45]. In addition, both Cd and As are also known to cause protein carbonylation [46], [22]. The present study probed changes in antioxidant defense proteins of T. asahii as a primary response to oxidative stress (OS) experienced in response to CdCl2 and NaAsO2.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Reagents

Acrylamide, ammonium sulphate, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), dithiothreitol (DTT), ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA), ferrous sulphate, hydrogen peroxide, iodoacetamide, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate NADP+, NADPH (reduced form of NADP+), nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT), oxidized glutathione (GSSG), phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF), reduced glutathione (GSH), sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), N,N,N_,N_ tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED), thiourea, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), Tris–HCl, urea were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich Corporation (USA). All general electrophoresis reagents were obtained from GE Healthcare. Metal ions used for producing oxidative stress were cadmium chloride (CdCl2) and sodium arsenite (NaAsO2).

Culture and experimental conditions

T. asahii was collected from metal-containing effluents in sterilized glass containers and yeast cells were sub-cultured on YPD [2% (w/v) glucose, 1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) bacto-peptone and 2% (w/v) agar (pH 6.5)] agar plates. Biomass was grown to log phase on a liquid salt medium containing: 1% (w/v) glucose, 0.1% (w/v) (NH4)2SO4, 0.015% (w/v) KH2PO4, 0.01% (w/v) K2HPO4, 0.01% (w/v) MgSO4·7H2O, 0.0026% (w/v) FeSO4, 0.0086% (w/v) CaCl2 (pH 7.0–7.2) with constant shaking incubation (120 rpm) at 30°C. After 24 hours, NaAsO2 and CdCl2 were added to yeast cultures to a final concentration of 100mg/L and cells were grown for a further 2 days. Controls were treated identically but without heavy metal exposure.

Survival to metal exposure

Cells were cultured on YPD agar plates at 30C in increasing concentrations of NaAsO2 and CdCl2 and minimum inhibitory concentration assessed [47]. The initial metal concentration used was 1 mM prepared from a 1 M metal stock solution. Grown yeast cells were subsequently transferred at a given concentration to next concentration and maximum resistance was evaluated until T. ashaii was unable to grow as colonies on metal-containing agar plates. Any colour changes of colonies or cultures in response to metal exposure were carefully noted.

Enzyme preparation

Approximately 1 g yeast cells (wet weight) was crushed in pestle and mortar to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and suspended in 2 ml of buffer containing 10 mM Tris-Cl buffer (pH 7.2), 1 mM EDTA, 0.5 M sucrose, 0.15 M KCl and 1 mM PMSF. Homogenates were centrifuged at 11,000×g for 15 min. (Sorvall RC 5C plus) and supernatants were immediately stored in aliquots at −80°C until required for further analysis. Protein concentration from each cell free sample extract was quantified by the method of Bradford [48] using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard. All operations were carried out at 4°C.

Enzyme activities

Biochemical measurements of glutathione-dependent enzymes (GST and GR) and antioxidant (SOD and CAT) were conducted using a spectrophotometer/microplate reader and activities were measured separately in response to metal ion treatment. Each enzymatic activity was determined in quadruplicate for each sample and data reported are means +/− standard deviations of three independent experiments. One unit (U) of enzyme activity is defined as the amount consuming 1 µM of substrate or generating 1 µM product/min.

Glutathione transferase

GST was determined by the method of Habig et al., [49]. The reaction mixture contained substrate for glutathione (GSH); 1 mM 1-chloro-2, 4- dinitrobenzene (CNDB), 1 mM reduced glutathione (GSH) in 150 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) and enzyme extract. The formation of S-2, 4-dinitrophenyl glutathione conjugate was followed as an increase in absorbance at 340 nm (every 20 or 30 s) for 5 min at 25°C.

Glutathione reductase

GR was determined by the method of Carlberg and Mannervik [50]. The reaction volume of 0.2 ml contained 0.48 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2), 1.1 mM EDTA with 8.5 mM oxidised glutathione (GSSG) and extract. The reaction mixture was equilibrated at 25°C before adding freshly-prepared 0.65 mM NADPH. Absorbance was read at 340 nm for 5 min.

Catalase

CAT activities were determined according to Beers and Sizer [51] based on disappearance of H2O2 recorded at 240 nm for 2–3 minutes at 25°C. The reaction mixture contained 30% H2O2 in potassium phosphate buffer (50 mM, pH 7.0), 1.9 ml reagent grade water and crude enzyme source.

Superoxide dismutase assay

SOD activity was determined by an indirect assay involving the inhibition of NBT reduction [52]. The reaction mixture contained 62.5 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 0.125 mM EDTA, 83.3 µM NBT, 150 µM NADH and 16.5 µM PMS. Reduction of NBT was monitored at 25°C as an absorbance increase at 560 nm (every 20 or 30 s) for 5 min. One U of SOD activity is defined as that amount of enzyme causing 50% inhibition of NBT.

One and two dimensional gel electrophoresis

One dimensional electrophoresis (1-DE) was performed in 14% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels [53]. Proteins from three independent cultures were pre-labeled with IAF prior to electrophoresis [54]. Tagged protein extracts were precipitated in 10% TCA followed by centrifugation for 3 min at 10,000×g. Supernatants were discarded and pellets solubilized in sample buffer. Marker (4 µl) and samples (20 µl) were heated at 95°C prior to loading for 3 min. Fluorescence images of proteins were captured on a Typhoon scanner (model 9410, GE Healthcare) using 450 PMT and intensity of fluorescence for each lane was calculated using ImageQuant software.

For 2-DE, protein thiols in protein extracts were pre-labeled with IAF prior to electrophoresis [54]. Tagged protein extracts (150 µg) were precipitated in 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), washed in cold acetone and dissolved in rehydration buffer containing 5 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% (w/v) CHAPS, 1% (w/v) De- Streak reagent (GE Healthcare), 4% (w/v) carrier ampholyte (Pharmalyte 3–10; Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Bucks. UK) and a trace amount of bromophenol blue. A final volume of 125 µl was incubated overnight on 7-cm IPG dry strips (pH 3–10; BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) and focused in a Protean IEF Cell (BioRad). IEF was initiated with linear voltage increases: 250 V for 30 min, 4000 V for 2 h and then up to 40,000 Vh for 7 cm IPG strips. IPG strips were equilibrated twice, first in DTT (0.5% w/v) followed by iodoacetamide (2.5% w/v) for 20 min. with gentle agitation on rocker in equilibration buffer [6 M urea, 0.375 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 20% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS]. After equilibration, IPG strips were rinsed with 1X running buffer and loaded on 14% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels along with 4 µl of standard proteins on filter paper covered with molten agarose (0.5% w/v) containing a trace of bromophenol blue. Electrophoresis was performed at 90 V for 30 min. followed by a constant voltage (120 V) using a mini PAGE system (Atto, Tokyo, Japan) until the dye front reached the end of the gel cassette. Gels were washed three times with Millipore water and fluorescence images of proteins captured on a Typhoon scanner (model 9410, GE Healthcare) using 450 PMT and intensity of fluorescence measured. Protein expression profiles (PEPs) in analytical gels were visualized by colloidal coomassie G-250 (Bio-Rad) staining [55].

Image analysis of two dimensional gels

Gels were scanned for fluorescence in a Model 9410 Typhoon scanner (Amersham-Pharmacia Biosciences, UK) and then stained with colloidal coomassie [55] before scanning in a calibrated GS-800 scanner (BioRad, USA). Image analysis was performed on either fluorescence or coomassie-stained images using Progenesis SameSpots software (Nonlinear Dynamics, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The images were automatically aligned and then edited manually as per the SameSpots workflow which enabled close to 100% spot matching. All images successfully passed the SameSpots quality assurance step. The SameSpots software uses powerful statistical analysis and arrives at conclusions by principal component analysis (PCA), correlation analysis, power analysis, and q-values to explore the data. Differentially expressed proteins were selected visually after this analysis. These spots were either present or absent in control or treatments. Spots were considered of interest when displaying <1.5-fold> difference between test and control samples as well as p<0.05 in ANOVA analysis.

Identification of proteins by MALDI-TOF/MS

Proteins were manually picked from 2DE separations, lightly stained with colloidal coomassie. Following in-gel tryptic digestion, extracted peptides were loaded onto a R2 micro-column (RP-C18 equivalent) where they were desalted, concentrated and eluted directly onto a MALDI plate using α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid (CHCA) as the matrix solution in 50% (v/v) acetonitrile and 5% (v/v) formic acid. Mass spectra of the peptides were acquired in positive reflectron MS and MS/MS modes using a MALDI-TOF/TOF MS instrument (4800plus MALDI TOF/TOF analyzer) with an exclusion list of the trypsin autolysis peaks (842.51, 1045.56, 2211.11 and 2225.12). The collected MS and MS/MS spectra were analysed in combined mode by Mascot search engine (version 2.2; Matrix Science, Boston, MA) and the NCBI database restricted to 50 ppm peptide mass tolerance for the parent ions, an error of 0.3 Da for the fragments, one missed cleavage in peptide masses, and carbamidomethylation of Cys and oxidation of Met as fixed and variable amino acid modifications, respectively. No taxonomy restrictions were applied. The identified proteins were only considered if a MASCOT score above 95% confidence was obtained (p<0.05) and at least one peptide was identified with a score above 95% confidence (p<0.05). This analysis was conducted by the Analytical Services Unit, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica (ITQB), New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal. Spot identifications and raw MS data were uploaded to the ProteomeXchange website (http://www.proteomexchange.org) and allocated the accession number 1-20140522-114745.

Statistical analyses

All data were obtained from a minimum of three independent experiments and calculated as means plus/minus standard deviations (±SD). Statistical analyses on enzyme specific activity data were performed using paired Student's t-test. The data obtained from protein gel images were tested for normality prior to any analysis and significance testing level was set at 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) and analysis of variance (one way ANOVA) was performed for comparison and assessment of statistical significant expression and redox variation between treatments and control.

Results and Discussion

Identification and culture conditions

Whilst screening for pollutant-resistant environmental fungi, a metal-resistant yeast was serendipitously isolated from wastewater of a textile plant in Lahore, Pakistan, [56], [57]. Nucleotide sequences were determined at the Center of Excellence in Molecular Biology, Lahore, Pakistan and identity with T. asahii confirmed using the basic local alignment search tool (). The isolate was maintained on YPD agar plates and grew well in a liquid salt medium in a 1% (w/v) glucose carbon source. Cultures survived well in 100 mg/L NaAsO2 and CdCl2, which corresponded to doses of 680 µM (Cd) and 770 µM (As). T. asahii is known to be widespread in the environment, presumably facilitating its role as an opportunistic pathogen [3][6], but its survival in a pollutant-rich industrial wastewater led us to explore the biochemical basis of its unexpected metal-resistance.

Tolerance to metal exposure

Metal tolerance of T. asahii isolates used in this study was assessed in both NaAsO2 and CdCl2 [57]. Cells tolerated NaAsO2 up to 30 mM and CdCl2 up to 10 mM. Biomass (Table 1) and growth rates (Fig. 1) were only modestly decreased when exposed to 100 mg/L NaAsO2 and CdCl2.

Table 1. Fresh weight of T. asahii yeast environmental isolate grown in minimal salt media supplemented with and without heavy metals.

Yeast isolate T. asahii Fresh weight expressed as %
Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Mean ± SD
Control (without heavy metal) 100 100 100 100
Cadmium Chloride (CdCl2) 71 96 78 82±12.9
Sodium Arsenite (NaAsO2) 91 79 92 87.3±7.2

Three biological and four technical replicates were used for further study and an equal gram weight was taken for protein extraction.

Figure 1. Growth curves for T. asahii cultures grown in the presence of 100 mg/L CdCl2 (green) and NaAsO2 (red).

Figure 1

Enzyme activity responses to cadmium and arsenite

Culturing of T. asahii cells in the presence of CdCl2 caused noticeable phenotypic changes suggesting a profound biological response to this metal. A decrease in fresh weight and biomass content was noted (Table 1). Cells also seemed to alter their cell wall structure and composition as they became noticeably much more difficult to lyse. Cadmium and other metals can sorb to cell walls of plants, algae, fungi and bacteria [56], so it is possible that this explains the change in cell wall characteristics observed here. In addition, colonies changed colour to brown from off-white and cell texture was also noted to be altered. A change in colour in response to metals has previously been noticed for Trichsporon sp grown in the presence of lead [57].

It was reasoned that detoxification and antioxidant enzymes such as GST, GR, SOD and CAT might contribute to metal-resistance by analogy with other yeasts [7][10], [58], [59]. Exposure to both CdCl2 and NaAsO2 strongly reduced GST activity (Fig. 2) but had no significant effect on SOD or CAT (Fig. 3). Whilst NaAsO2 exposure caused increased GR activity, CdCl2 had no effect on this enzyme (Fig. 2) indicating a level of specificity in terms of metal effects on this panel of enzymes.

Figure 2. Relative specific activities for GR (panel A) and GST (panel B) in T. asahii cultures exposed to CdCl2 and NaAsO2.

Figure 2

Values are expressed as mean of SD and experiments were performed in triplicate (*p<0.05; **p<0.1 when compared with controls).

Figure 3. Relative specific activities for CAT (panel A) and SOD (panel B) in T. asahii extracts from yeast cultured in the presence of CdCl2 and NaAsO2.

Figure 3

Values are expressed as mean of SD and experiments were performed in triplicate.

These data suggest that T. asahii possesses adequate CAT and SOD activity to cope with metal-related ROS and did not need to induce higher levels of these antioxidant enzymes. However, enhanced GR on exposure to NaAsO2 indicates that T. asahii has a requirement for more GSH on exposure to this metal which was not the case for CdCl2. Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants for yap1 have previously been reported to show both increased levels of carbonylated proteins and decreased GSH:GSSG ratio on exposure to arsenic [22] which is consistent with our observed arsenic-related effects on GR. Both metals triggered a large decrease in GST activity, which may indicate inactivation of this enzyme by exposure to ROS.

Protein oxidation effects revealed by one-dimensional electrophoresis

Oxidation of proteins occurs commonly in metal-induced OS [18][24]. The thiol group of cysteine is notoriously susceptible to such oxidation [17], [18]. Analysis of the T. asahii proteomic response to CdCl2 and NaAsO2 could be potentially important for understanding the mechanism of metal-resistance. Thiol groups of proteins were tagged with IAF (which does not label oxidized variants of protein thiols) and proteins separated by 1-DE [53]. Total IAF-associated fluorescence was measured in each electrophoresis lane for control and metal-exposed extracts prior to protein staining. A ratio of fluorescence to colloidal coomassie staining intensity was then calculated (Fig. 4). This revealed that CdCl2 caused a strong reduction of total protein thiols while NaAsO2 caused an increase of thiol groups. This suggests that CdCl2 causes OS evident at the protein level while NaAsO2 had a protective effect to OS, which is consistent with the observed enhanced GR activity (Fig. 2). A key contribution of GSH is to maintain protein thiols in their reduced state and elevated GR activity would be expected to contribute strongly to this. A recent report in S. cerevisiae showed that arsenite challenge increased GSH biosynthesis with attendant increase in GR expression [60].

Figure 4. 1DE analysis of IAF-labelled T. asahii proteins.

Figure 4

Proteins (150 µg) extracted from T. asahii were labelled with 0.2 mM IAF and subjected to 1DE. The gels were scanned for IAF fluorescence in a Typhoon scanner followed by staining in colloidal coomassie. Panel A shows coomassie-stained gels whilst panel B is the corresponding IAF fluorescence image. Changes in total spot intensity between treated and untreated cells were quantified by Image Quant software analysis (Panel C).

Protein oxidation effects by two-dimensional electrophoresis

Because of the effects on cell wall rigidity, it was not possible to extract sufficient protein from CdCl2-treated T. asahii for 2-DE analysis in this study. Therefore, protein expression signatures (PES) were compared only between control and NaAsO2 –treated cells (Fig. 5). This comparison matched 1075 spots and revealed up-/down-regulation of certain spots quantified by SameSpots image analysis software in either colloidal coomassie-stained gels (Fig. 5) or IAF fluorescence intensity (Fig. 6) with p<0.05 and intensity changes <1.5-fold>. In total, based on either changes in colloidal coomassie staining intensity or in IAF-associated fluorescence, 40 spots were excised for in-gel tryptic digestion and identification by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. Of these, 31 spots were successfully identified (see arrows in Figs. 5 and 6) and 26 of these matched well to the two recently-released genomes for T. asahii for strains CBS 8904 [13] and CBS 2479 [14] (Table 2). The sole non-T. asahii protein spot (spot no. 14) matched to an endoribonuclease of Aeromonas hydrophila, a heterotrophic, gram-negative bacterium known to inhabit water in areas of warm climate which sometimes causes necrotizing fasciitis in humans. It is possible that this bacterium contaminated our T. asahii cultures. Eighteen spots were identified as containing T. asahii proteins of known function whilst 8 were found to contain hypothetical proteins. A striking number of metabolic enzymes (12 of 18 spots representing 10 unique enzymes) were identified as well as heat shock proteins (4 of 18 spots representing 3 unique proteins). The two other proteins were Pre3p, a component of the 20S proteasome, and the translation elongation factor 2 (Table 2).

Figure 5. 2DE analysis of proteins from T. asahii stained with colloidal coomassie.

Figure 5

Following fluorescence scanning, gels were stained with colloidal coomassie brilliant blue. Increase or decrease of protein spot intensity was estimated by Progenesis Samespot analysis software and images were normalized prior to applying any statistics. Spots excised for identification are indicated by arrows. Circles represent spots showing variation both in protein expression and in thiol oxidation (see Table 4). Inset: Zoom boxes are shown for spots.

Figure 6. 2DE analysis of proteins from T. asahii labeled with IAF at protein thiols.

Figure 6

Prior to 2DE, protein thiols were labeled with IAF. Gels were scanned for IAF-associated fluorescence and images were analysed by Progenesis Samespot analysis software. Images were normalized prior to applying any statistics. Spots showing significant (p<0.05) decrease in IAF-associated fluorescence were excised for identification and are indicated by arrows (see Table 2). Inset: Zoom boxes are shown for spots.

Table 2. Identification of T. asahii yeast proteins.

Spot Identified Protein Organism Accession number d MW m Protein Scorea/Confidence Interval (%) Ion Score/Confidence Interval (%) Sequence Coverage (%) No. of MS/MS patterns assigned to peptidesb P-value Fold change
Metabolic enzymes (energy and respiration)
1 3-Isopropylmalate dehydrogenase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406698071 53569 694/100 639/100 44 6 6.43E-04 1.6
2 Phospholipase B Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401884039 71965 870/100 837/100 27 7 0.002 1.6
3 Malate dehydrogenase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401884576 35270 1190/100 1133/100 67 8 0.005 −2
4 3-Hydroxyisobutyryl- CoA hydrolase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406696953 57118 1190/100 1073/100 61 8 0.005 −2.2
5 Aconitase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406694125 85654 1320/100 1228/100 36 9 0.007 −2.5
6 Aconitase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406694125 85654 1320/100 1228/100 36 9 0.008 −1.6
7 Homoserine dehydrogenase Hom6 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406695321 40376 338/100 303/100 28 2 0.017 −1.7
8 Alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401885827 51027 891/100 815/100 45 7 0.017 2
9 Aldehyde reductase I (Alcohol dehydrogenase) Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401886852 64647 1560/100 1479/100 50 10 0.02 −1.9
10 ATP synthase alpha chain, precursor Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401889058 58090 1170/100 1068/100 47 9 0.023 1.7
11 Aconitase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406694125/ 85654 799/100 712/100 35 5 0.015 −2
12 Phosphoglycerate kinase Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406694335 49924 1890/100 1734/100 61 10 0.025 −1.5
Protein biosynthesis and folding
13 Translation elongation factor 2 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406694343 51124 423/100 397/100 36 4 0.009 −3.4
14 Endoribonuclease LPSP Aeromonas hydrophila subsp. hydrophila ATCC 7966 gi|117619955 13357 199/100 186/100 46 1 4.45E-05 2.3
Nonfunctional and abnormal protein degradation
15 20S Proteasome beta-type subunit, Pre3p Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406698063 25360 435/100 422/100 33 4 0.036 1.8
Protein repair and folding
16 Heat shock protein Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401888774 71440 548/100 490/100 39 4 0.002 −3.1
17 Heat shock protein Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406695586 98932 1200/100 1065/100 42 7 0.019 −3.1
18 Heat shock protein 70 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401882131 70187 846/100 798/100 34 8 0.021 −4.5
19 Heat shock protein70 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401882131 70187 1960/100 1704/100 63 11 0.034 −2.1
Hypothetical Proteins
20 Hypothetical protein A1Q1_08001 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401886770 21217 1310/100 1266/100 53 9 3.44E-05 2.5
21 Hypothetical protein A1Q2_03020 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406699588 60263 441/100 403/100 35 2 0.011 −2.4
22 Hypothetical protein A1Q1_06950 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401887835 33117 432/100 399/100 30 3 0.011 1.9
23 Hypothetical protein A1Q1_06913 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401887891 71289 1460/100 1403/100 38 11 0.011 1.8
24 Hypothetical protein A1Q1_00754 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401888905 53663 539/100 503/100 42 4 0.013 −1.6
25 Hypothetical protein A1Q2_04745 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406697616 53697 333/100 333/100 20 2 0.016 −2.1
26 Hypothetical protein A1Q2_04745 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 8904 gi|406697616 53697 341/100 341/100 7 2 0.034 −1.9
27 Hypothetical protein A1Q1_06913 Trichosporon asahii var. asahii CBS 2479 gi|401887891 71289 964/100 904/100 38 8 0.041 1.6

Protein thiols were labeled with IAF following exposure to NaAsO2 and identified by MALDI-TOF/TOF MS. MW (molecular masses) are expressed in Da. Spots (1–12) showed up-regulated metabolic enzymes; (16–19) were involved in protein synthesis and repair enzymes; (20–31) were hypothetical proteins. Spots taken arbitrarily showed NA p-value and fold-change. These all proved to be hypothetical proteins.

a

Protein score probability limit (where P<0.05) was 86.

b

Peptides with confidence interval >95% were considered.

d

Database accession number obtained from NCBI (top hits shown).

m

mass of identified proteins.

Some of the proteins identified here are well-known to be redox-sensitive in S. cerevisiae; phosphoglycerate kinase, translation elongation factor 2 and aconitase [61]. In the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. arsenic has been reported to induce phosphoglycerate kinase, ATP synthase alpha subunit and hsp 70 all of which feature in Table 1 [62] while arsenic-challenged Klebsiella pneumoniae up-regulates alcohol dehydrogenase, aconitase and hsp 70 and down-regulates malate dehydrogenase [63]. It is noteworthy that 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase, alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase, 3-hydroxyisobutyryl CoA hydrolase and homoserine dehydrogenase are all involved in amino acid metabolism suggesting a strong metabolic effect of NaAsO2 on this aspect of cell physiology. Of 53 metabolic proteins identified in misfolded protein aggregates arising from arsenite exposure in S. cerevisiae, 27 were associated with amino acid metabolism [64]. Similarly, identification of hsp 70 and a component of the 20S proteasome is consistent with arsenite toxicity being mediated via effects on protein folding in S. cerevisiae [64]. Arsenite challenge also causes changes to sulphur metabolism in S. cerevisiae leading to increased GSH biosynthesis [60]. Our data suggest that NaAsO2 elicits strong effects on key cellular processes such as redox-response, amino acid metabolism, protein folding/mis-folding and protein turnover in T. asahii.

More than one third of T. asahii spots studied here (8 of 26) were identified as 6 unique hypothetical proteins (Table 2). These commonly comprise 30–40% of microbial genes [65], [66]. There is growing interest in mining microbial genomes to improve annotation of hypothetical proteins by a variety of functional, computational and structure analysis approaches [66], [67]. In the present context, it is evident that the 6 unique hypothetical proteins identified here are indeed expressed at the protein level and they are likely to be of functional significance to T. asahii in response to NaAsO2. In an effort to ascribe putative functions to these proteins, searches were performed for the six accessions identified in NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and putative functional domains were identified in the conserved domain database (CDD) [68]. Full-length sequences were also entered in Pfam to identify protein families by sequence alignment [69]. This analysis is summarized in Table 3. Whilst allocation of function to hypothetical proteins must of necessity be tentative, possible roles for four of the hypothetical proteins can be suggested. A1Q1_08001 contains an N-terminal domain common in NADP(H) dehydrogenases. NADPH is the key source of reducing equivalents for reduction of GSH and induction of NADPH-producing pathways such as the pentose phosphate pathway is commonly observed in oxidative stress [70]. A1Q2_03020 contains an aldehyde dehydrogenase (ADH) domain. ADHs detoxify aldehydes by reducing them to carboxylic acids and are often expressed in stress-response scenarios in which some ADHs form part of phase 2 of detoxification [71]. Both A1Q1_06950 and A1Q1_06913 contain a domain similar to the lactam utilization protein LamB/YcsF family of proteins, which may be involved in hydrolysis of glycosidic bonds. In addition, A1Q1_06913 contains an N-terminal glyoxal oxidase domain. In the wood-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium, glyoxal oxidase is a H2O2-producing secreted enzyme the active site of which is similar to galactose oxidase [72] which CDD also found as a C-terminal domain in A1Q1_06913 (Table 3). Lastly, both A1Q1_00754 and A1Q2_00745 contain calpain-like domains. Calpains are proteases containing redox-sensitive active site cysteines [73]. Taken together, it is possible that the hypothetical proteins identified here also form part of a response to oxidative stress in T. asahii in response to NaAsO2.

Table 3. Domain analysis of hypothetical proteins identified in this study.

Hypothetical protein (Spot no.) Accession Database Domain (residues) Function E-value
A1Q1_08001 (Spot 20) gi|401886770 CDD Flavodoxin 2 superfamily (8–190) NADP(H) dehydrogenases 2.13e-59
Pfam NADPH-Dependent FMN reductases (18–142) NADP(H) dehydrogenases 1.3e-07
A1Q2_03020 (Spot 21) gi|406699588 CDD ALDH_F5_SSADH_GabD (102-551) Succinate semialdehyde dehydrogenase 0e00
Pfam Aldehyde dehydrogenases (1–460) Aldehyde dehydrogenases 4.1e-158
A1Q1_06950 (Spot 22) gi|401887835 CDD GH38-57_N_LamB_YdjC_SF super family (65–301) Glycoside hydrolases 6.73e-102
Pfam LamB_YcsF family (4–241) Lactam utilization 3e-67
A1Q1_06913 (Spots 23 and 27) gi|401887891 CDD Glyoxal oxidase N-terminus (71–300) Glyoxal oxidase 1.16e-41
E_set_GO_C (461–577) Galactose oxidase 1.44e-16
Pfam Glyoxal_oxid_N (63–300) Glyoxal oxidase 1.8e-41
LamB_YcsF family (140–241) Lactam utilization 4.6e-10
A1Q1_00754 (Spot 24) gi|401888905 CDD CysPc Superfamily (157–470) Calpains 1.69e-06
Pfam Peptidase C2 family (155–226) Calpains 0.0021
A1Q2_04745 (Spots 25, 26) gi|406697616 CDD CysPc Superfamily (157–477) Calpains 1.88e-05
Pfam Peptidase C2 family (141–229) Calpains 0.0072

Accession codes were entered into CDD whilst full-length sequences were entered in Pfam.

Spots 1, 2, 8, 10, 14, 15, 20, 22, 23 and 27 were found to be induced in terms of protein abundance (Table 2) suggesting up-regulation of key proteins comprising a PEP; 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase, phospholipase B, alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase, the alpha chain of ATP synthase, pre3p component of 20S proteasome and hypothetical proteins A1Q1_08001, A1Q2_06950, A1Q2_00754 and A1Q1_06913. In Arabidopsis thaliana a redox-active 3-isopropylmalate dehydrogenase has been reported in which activity is regulated by a protein thiol [74]. In yeast, the presence of a peroxisomal target sequence allows uptake of alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase from cytosol [75]. Peroxisomes are an important source of H2O2 and help maintain a balance between ROS generation and consumption [76]. As noted above, the alpha chain of ATP synthase is also up-regulated in the cyanobacterium Anabaena sp. in response to oxidative stress [62].

IAF labeling allowed detection of oxidation-associated decreases in protein thiol groups in the following proteins: malate dehydrogenase, 3-hydroxyisobutyryl-CoA reductase, aconitase, homoserine dehydrogenase hom6, aldehyde reductase 1, phosphoglycerate kinase, translation elongation factor 2, heat shock protein 70, and hypothetical proteins A1Q2_03020 A1Q2_00754 and A1Q2_04745. Only three proteins, homoserine dehydrogenase hom6 and hypothetical proteins A1Q2_03020 and A1Q2_00754 showed both enhanced abundance and decreased IAF-associated fluorescence (Table 4). As mentioned above, many of the proteins identified here are known to be redox-sensitive in S. cerevisiae or responsive to arsenic [61][63]. A manually-curated database of protein oxidation (http://biocomputer.bio.cuhk.edu.hk/RedoxDB) containing 1277 proteins with experimentally confirmed cysteine oxidation at specific sites in S. cerevisiae aconitase, translation elongation factor 2 and malate dehydrogenase [77]. Taken together, these data suggest that certain protein thiol groups are preferentially oxidised in NaAsO2-induced stress. There is growing interest in study and prediction of cysteine-associated functions in proteins including structural roles, redox buffering, catalysis and redox signaling [78][80]. In particular, reversible cysteine oxidation is a key aspect of H2O2-mediated cell signaling in yeast [81] and such cysteines are increasingly amenable to experimental identification [80], [82]. It is thought that approximately one quarter of exposed cysteines in the yeast proteome may be susceptible to specific reversible oxidation effects with functional significance including being thiol oxidoreductase substrates, sites of structural disulfides or of metal binding [80]. The ability of metals to alter the redox status of cysteines therefore provides a key general mechanism for toxicity of metal-rich industrial waters to fungi in environmental toxicology.

Table 4. Protein spots picked from protein expression and IAF fluorescence gels were excised and subjected to MS for identification.

Spot Proteins in IAF fluorescence gels Proteins in protein expression gels Proteins present in both IAF & Expression gels
1 +
2 +
3 +
4 + + +
5 +
6 +
7 + + +
8 +
9 +
10 +
11 +
12 +
13 +
14 +
15 +
16 +
17 +
18 +
19 +
20 +
21 + + +
22 +
23 +
24 + + +
25 +
26 +
27 +

Note that spots 4, 7, 21 and 24 showed variation in both gel analyses.

Concluding remarks

An environmentally sampled isolate of T. asahii showed considerable tolerance to both CdCl2 and NaAsO2. NaAsO2 caused an increase in GR activity and increase in overall amounts of reduced protein thiols. However, CdCl2 had no effect on GR, reduced GST activity (as did NaAsO2) and significantly reduced total protein thiols. It was also noted that CdCl2 had strong effects on some of the physical attributes of the cell wall, which made 2DE analysis impossible for CdCl2-treated samples. However, such analysis of NaAsO2–exposed cells revealed a PEP comprising several up-regulated proteins many of which are known to be either redox-responsive or arsenate-sensitive. In addition, some proteins were found to be preferentially oxidised in their thiol groups suggesting specific targeting of key proteins during NaAsO2 –induced cellular stress. Taken together, our study shows that T. asahii can up-regulate key proteins to allow survival in the presence of NaAsO2 but also that ROS produced as a consequence of this metal source can target thiols of specific proteins with expected biochemical effects especially on amino acid metabolism.

Funding Statement

Prof Sheehan's lab is supported by the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions of the Higher Education Authority of Ireland. Ms. Ilyas was supported to make a research visit by the International research Initiative Programme of the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ (2004) Rare and emerging pathogens: Concern for resistance beyond Candida albicans and Aspergillus fumigatus . Journal of Clinical Microbiology 42: 4419–4431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Diaz-Guerra TM, Mellado E, Cano V, Tapia C, et al. (2005) Susceptibility patterns and molecular identification of Trichosporon species. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 49: 4026–4034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Sugita T, Ichikawa T, Matsukura M, Sueda M, Takashima M, et al. (2001) Genetic diversity and biochemical characteristics of Trichosporon asahii isolated from clinical specimens, houses of patients with summer-type hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and environmental materials. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 29: 2405–2411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Sugita T, Nishikawa A, Ichikawa T, Ikeda R, Shinoda T (2000) Isolation of Trichosporon asahii from environmental materials. Medical Mycology 38: 27–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Zhang E, Sugita T, Tsuboi R, Yamazaki T, Makimura K (2011) The opportunistic yeast pathogen Trichosporon asahii colonizes the skin of healthy individuals: Analysis of 380 healthy individuals by age and gender using a nested polymerase chain reaction. Microbiology and Immunology 55: 483–488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sun W, Su JR, Xu SZ, Yan DH (2012) Trichosporon asahii causing nosocomial urinary tract infections in intensive care unit patients: Genotypes, virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility testing. Journal of Medical Microbiology 61: 1750–1757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Salinas E, Elorza de Orellano M, Rezza I (2000) Removal of cadmium and lead from dilute aqueous solutions by Rhodotorula rubra . Bioresource Technology 72: 107–112. [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cho DH, Kim EY (2003) Characterization of Pb2+ biosorption from aqueous solution by Rhodotorula glutinis . Bioprocess and Biosystem Engineering 25: 271–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Li ZJ, Yuan HL (2006) Characterization of cadmium removal by Rhodotorula sp Y11. Applied Microbiology Biotechnology 73: 458–463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Li ZJ, Yuan HL, Hu XD (2008) Cadmium-resistance in growing Rhodotorula sp Y11. Bioresource Technology 99: 1339–1344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Sheehan D, Meade G, Foley VM, Dowd CA (2001) Structure, function and evolution of glutathione transferases: implications for classification of non-mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochemical Journal 360: 1–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Blackwell KJ, Singleton I, Tobin JM (1995) Metal cation uptake by yeast: a review. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 43: 579–584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Yang RY, Li HT, Zhu H, Zhou GP, Wang M, et al. (2012) Draft genome sequence of the Trichosporon asahii environmental strain CBS 8904. Eukaryotic cell 12: 1586–1587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Yang RY, Li HT, Zhu H, Zhou GP, Wang M, et al. (2012) Draft genome sequence of CBS 2479, the standard type strain of Trichosporon asahii . Eukaryotic cell 11: 1415–1416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hensley K, Robinson KA, Gabbita SP, Salsman S, Floyd RA (2000) Reactive oxygen species, cell signalling and cell injury. Free Radical Biology Medicine 28: 1456–1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nordberg J, Arner ESJ (2001) Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants, and the mammalian thioredoxin system. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 31: 1287–1312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Halliwell B, Whiteman M (2004) Measuring reactive species and oxidative damage in vivo and in cell culture: How should we do it and what do the results mean? British Journal of Pharmacology 142: 231–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Winterbourn CC (2008) Reconciling the chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species. Nature Chemical Biology 4: 278–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Liu SX, Athar M, Lippai I, Waldren C, Hei TK (2001) Induction of oxyradicals by arsenic: implication for mechanism of genotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 98: 1643–1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Du L, Yu Y, Chen J, Liu Y, Xia Y, et al. (2007) Arsenic induces caspase-and mitochondria-mediated apoptosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . FEMS Yeast Research 7: 860–865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Liang Q, Zhou B (2007) Copper and manganese induce yeast apoptosis via different pathways. Molecular Biology of the Cell 18: 4741–4749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Menezes RA, Amaral C, Batista-Nascimento L, Santos C, Ferreira RB, et al. (2008) Contribution of Yap1 towards Saccharomyces cerevisiae adaptation to arsenic-mediated oxidative stress. Biochemical Journal 414: 301–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Gomes DS, Pereira MD, Panek AD, Andrade LR, Eleutherio EC (2013) Apoptosis as a mechanism for removal of mutated cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: The role of Grx2 under cadmium exposure, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (in press) doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 24. Ghezzi P, Bonetto V (2003) Redox proteomics: identification of oxidatively modified proteins. Proteomics 3: 1145–1153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Davies MJ (2005) The oxidative environment and protein damage. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1703: 93–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Sheehan D (2006) Detection of redox-based modification in two dimensional electrophoresis proteomic separations. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 349: 455–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Klomsiri C, Karplus PA, Poole L (2011) Cysteine-based redox switches in enzymes. Antioxidants Redox Signaling 14: 1065–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Levine RL, Garland D, Oliver CN, Amici A, Climent I, et al. (1990) Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods in Enzymology 186, 464–478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Maisonneuve E, Ducret A, Khoueiry P, Lignon S, Longhi S, et al. (2009) Rules governing selective protein carbonylation. PLoS One 4; e7269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Van Der Vlies D, Pap EHW, Post JA, Celis JE, Wirtz KWA (2002) Endoplasmic reticulum proteins of normal human dermal fibroblasts are the major targets for oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide. Biochemical Journal 366: 825–830. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Rabek JP, Boylston WH, Papconstantinou J (2003) Carbonylation of ER chaperone proteins in aged mouse liver. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 305: 566–572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Corbi N, Batassa EM, Pisani C, Onori A, Di Certo MG, et al. (2010) The eEF1 gamma subunit contacts RNA polymerase II and binds vimentin promoter region. PLoS One 5: e14481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Braconi D, Bernardini G, Santucci A (2011) Linking protein oxidation to environmental pollutants: Redox proteomic approaches. Journal of Proteomics 74: 2324–2337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Von Moos N, Slaveykova VI (2014) Oxidative stress induced by inorganic nanoparticles in bacteria and aquatic microalgae –State of the art and knowledge gaps. Nanotoxicology 8: 605–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Tedesco S, Doyle H, Redmond G, Sheehan D (2008) Gold nanoparticles and oxidative stress in Mytilus edulis . Marine Environmental Research 66: 131–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Regoli F, Giuliani ME (2013) Oxidative pathways of chemical toxicity and oxidative stress biomarkers in marine organisms. Marine Environmental Research 93: 106–117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Martyniuk CJ, Alvarez S, Denslow ND (2012) DIGE and iTRAQ as biomarker discovery tools in aquatic toxicology. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 76: 3–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pedriali A, Riva C, Parolini M, Cristoni S, Sheehan D, et al. A redox proteomic investigation of oxidative stress caused by benzoylecgonine in the freshwater bivalve Dreissena polymorpha . Drug Testing and Analysis 5: 646–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wu SJ, Xu X, Zhao SL, Shen FC, Chen JM (2013) Evaluation of phenanthrene toxicity on earthworm (Eisenia fetida): An ecotoxicoproteomics approach. Chemosphere 93: 963–971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Aposhian HV, Aposhian MM (2006) Arsenic toxicology: five questions. Chemical Research in Toxicology 19: 1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Kitchin KT, Wallace K (2008) The role of protein binding of trivalent arsenicals in arsenic carcinogenesis and toxicity. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 102: 532–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Höfgen R, Kreft O, Wilmitzer L, Hesse H (2001) Manipulation of thiol contents in plants. Amino Acids 20: 291–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mejare M, Blow L (2001) Metal-binding proteins and peptides in bioremediation and phytoremediation of heavy metals. Trends in Biotechnology 19: 67–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Pal SK, Das TK (2005) Biochemical characterization of N-methyl N′-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced cadmium resistant mutants of Aspergillus niger . Journal of Biosciences 30: 639–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Irazusta V, Obis E, Moreno-Cermeno A, Cabiscol E, Ros J, et al. (2010) Yeast frataxin mutants display decreased superoxide dismutase activity crucial to promote protein oxidative damage. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 48: 411–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Adamis PDB, Panek AD, Eleutherio ECA (2007) Vacuolar compartmentation of the cadmium-glutathione complex protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from mutagenesis. Toxicology Letters 173: 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Muñoz AJ, Ruiz E, Abriouel H, Gálvez A, Ezzouhri L, et al. (2012) Heavy metal tolerance of microorganisms isolated from wastewaters: Identification and evaluation of its potential for biosorption. Chemical Engineering Journal 210: 325–332. [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Bradford MM (1976) Rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72: 248–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB (1974) Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 249: 7130–7139. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Carlberg I, Mannervik B (1985) Glutathione reductase. Methods in Enzymology 113: 484–490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Beers RF Jr, Sizer IW (1952) A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 195: 133–140. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ewing JF, Janero DR (1995) Microplate superoxide dismutase assay employing a nonenzymatic superoxide generator. Analytical Biochemistry 232: 243–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during assembly of the head of the bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Baty JW, Hampton MB, Winterbourn CC (2002) Detection of oxidant sensitive thiol proteins by fluorescence labeling and two dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2: 1261–1266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Dyballa N, Metzger S (2009) Fast and Sensitive Colloidal Coomassie G-250 Staining for proteins in polyacrylamide gels. Journal of Visual Experimentation 30: 1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Volesky B, Holan ZR (1995) Sorption of heavy-metals. Biotechnology Progress 11: 235–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Rehman A, Anjum MS (2011) Multiple metal tolerance and biosorption of cadmium by Candida tropicalis isolated from industrial effluents: Glutathione as detoxifying agent. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 174: 585–595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Ayer A, Fellermeier S, Fife C, Li SS, Smits G, et al. (2012) A genome-wide screen in yeast identifies specific oxidative stress genes required for the maintenance of sub-cellular redox homeostasis. PLOS One 7: e44278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Herrero E, Ros J, Belli G, Cabiscol E (2008) Redox control and oxidative stress in yeast cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – General Subjects 1780: 1217–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Thorsen M, Lagniel G, Kristiansson E, Junot C, Nerman O, et al. (2007) Quantitative transcriptome, proteome and sulfur metabolite profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to arsenite. Physiological Genomics 30: 35–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. McDonagh B, Ogueta S, Lasarte G, Padilla CA, Barcena JA (2009) Shotgun redox proteomics identifies specifically modified cysteines in key metabolic enzymes under oxidative stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Journal of Proteomics 72: 677–689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Pandey S, Rai R, Rai LC (2012) Proteomics combines morphological, physiological and biochemical attributes to unravel the survival strategy of Anabaena sp. PCC7120 under arsenic stress. Journal of Proteomics 75: 921–937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Daware V, Kesavan S, Patil R, Natu A, Kumar A, et al. (2012) Effects of arsenite stress on growth and proteome of Klebsiella pneumoniae . Journal of Biotechnology 158: 8–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Jacobsen T, Navarette C, Sharma SK, Sideri TC, Ibstedt S, et al. (2012) Arsenite interferes with protein folding and triggers formation of protein aggregates in yeast. Journal of Cell Science 125: 5075–5083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Quiao J, Shao M, Chen L, Wang J, Wu G, et al. (2013) Systematic characterization of hypothetical proteins in Synechocystis sp. 6803 reveals proteins functionally relevant to stress response. Gene 512: 6–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Choi HP, Juarez S, Ciordia S, Fernandez M, Bargiela R, et al. (2013) Biochemical characterization of hypothetical proteins from Helicobacter pylori . PLoS One 8, e66605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Nimrod G, Schusan M, Steinberg DM, Ben-Tal N (2008) Detection of functionally important regions in “hypothetical proteins” of known structure. Structure 16: 1755–1763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, et al. (2011) CDD: A conserved domain database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic acids Research (Database issue) 39: D225–229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Punta M, Coggill PC, Eberhardt RY, Mistry J, Tate J, et al. (2012) The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Research (Database issue) 40: D290–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Rebelato E, Abdulkadar F, Curi R, Carpinelli AR (2011) Control of the intracellular redox state by glucose participates in the insulin secretion mechanism. PLoS One 6: e24507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Muzio G, Maggiora M, Paiuzzi E, Oraldi M, Canuto RA (2012) Aldehyde dehydrogenases and cell proliferation. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 52: 735–746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Whittaker MM, Kersten PJ, Cullen D, Whittaker JW (1999) Identification of catalytic residues in glyoxal oxidase by targeted mutagenesis. Journal of Biological Chemistry 274: 36226–36232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Vanderklish PW, Bahr BA (2000) The pathogenic activation of calpain: A marker and modulator of cellular toxicity and disease states. International Journal of Experimental Pathology 81: 323–339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. He Y, Mawhinney TP, Preuss ML, Schroeder AC, Chen B, et al. (2009) A redox-active isopropylmalate dehydrogenase functions in the biosynthesis of glucosinalates and leucine in Arabidopsis. Plant Journal 60: 679–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Knott TG, Birdsey GM, Sinclair KE, Gallagher IM, Purdue PE, et al. (2000) The peroxisomal targeting sequence type 1 receptor, Pex5p, and the peroxisomal import efficiency of alanine:glyoxylate aminotransferase. Biochemical Journal 352: 409–418. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Schrader M, Fahimi HD (2006) Peroxisomes and oxidative stress. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – Molecular Cell Research 1763: 1755–1766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Sun MA, Wang Y, Cheng H, Zhang Q, Ge W, et al. (2012) RedoxDB – A curated database of experimentally verified protein redox modification. Bioinformatics 28, 2551–2552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Marino SM, Gladyshev VN (2011) Redox biology: Computational approaches to the investigation of functional cysteine residues. Antioxidants and Redox Signaling 15, 135–146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Hansen RE, Roth D, Winther JR (2009) Quantifying the global cellular thiol-disulfide status. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 422–427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Marino SM, Li YH, Fomenko DE, Agisheva N, Cerny RL, et al. (2010) Characterization of surface-exposed reactive cysteine residues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Biochemistry 49, 7709–7721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Garcia-Santamarina S, Boronat S, Hidalgo E (2014) Reversible cysteine oxidation in hydrogen peroxide sensing and signal transduction. Biochemistry 53, 2560–2580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Garcia-Santamarina S, Boronat S, Domenech A, Ayte J, Molina H, et al. (2014) Monitoring in vivo reversible cysteine oxidation in proteins using ICAT and mass spectrometry. Nature Protocols 9, 1131–1145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES