Abstract
Altruism is a group phenomenon in which some genes or individuals, which must be presumed to be selfish, benefit others at cost to themselves. The presumption of selfishness and the fact of altruism are reconciled by kin-group selection and by reciprocal altruism. Kin-group selection is clearly visible only in special cases; its role even among social insects may be overestimated; it is probably usually inhibited by competition. However, reciprocal altruism is ubiquitous. All altruism is: (i) potentially reciprocal; (ii) potentially profitable to altruists as well as to recipients; (iii) environmentally determined, usually by position of individuals in group or environmental situations; and (iv) a net-gain lottery. These generalizations are illustrated by four idealized cases; the difficulty of applying them to real cases is illustrated by alarm-calling in groups of birds. Although altruism is a group phenomenon, it evolves by individual selection, by processes equivalent to co-evolutions. Its evolution is: (i) opposed by competition; (ii) costly, complex, and slow, and tending to produce an imprecise flexible altruism rather than a precisely detailed one; and (iii) supplemented by group selection (differential extinction of groups). That altruism in human beings conforms to these generalizations is a good working hypothesis. However, analysis does not “take the altruism out of (human) altruism.” Humans do not calculate it, but behave altruistically because they have human altruistic emotions.
Keywords: set and group selection, kin selection, human evolution
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Darlington P. J., Jr Competition, competitive repulsion, and coexistence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Nov;69(11):3151–3155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.11.3151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlington P. J., Jr Group selection, altruism, reinforcement, and throwing in human evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Sep;72(9):3748–3752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.9.3748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlington P. J., Jr Nonmathematical concepts of selection, evolutionary energy, and levels of evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 May;69(5):1239–1243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.5.1239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlington P. J., Jr Nonmathematical models for evolution of altruism, and for group selection (peck order-territoriality-ant colony-dual-determinant model-tri-determinant model). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Feb;69(2):293–297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.2.293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darlington P. J., Jr The cost of evolution and the imprecision of adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1977 Apr;74(4):1647–1651. doi: 10.1073/pnas.74.4.1647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans J. R., Massler M. The effective clinical teacher. J Dent Educ. 1977 Oct;41(10):613–617. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sherman P. W. Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science. 1977 Sep 23;197(4310):1246–1253. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4310.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simpson G. G. An adversary view of sociobiology. Science. 1977 Feb 25;195(4280):773–774. doi: 10.1126/science.195.4280.773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]