Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 1978 Feb;75(2):554–558. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.2.554

On the formation of protein tertiary structure on a computer.

A T Hagler, B Honig
PMCID: PMC411293  PMID: 273217

Abstract

In this paper we carry out computer simulation studies of some of the factors responsible for protein tertiary structure. We show that it is possible to obtain (fold) a compact globular conformation from a sequence of amino acids consisting of only glycines and alanines. Our results indicate that glycines play a central role in stabilizing globular structures by facilitating the formation of turns and by destabilizing helical structures. Using this simple two-amino-acid representation, which serves as a control experiment, we are able to obtain a conformation that resembles the native structure of pancreatic trypsin inhibitor, as closely as any obtained previously in folding studies. However, careful examination reveals that the true chain topology has not been reproduced here or in previous studies. We suggest that the discrepancies between calculated and observed structures are more significant than the similarities. The implications of these results for the validity of models for protein folding, the use of pancreatic trypsin inhibitor in folding studies, and the possible role of glycine in the evolution of protein structure are discussed.

Full text

PDF
554

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anfinsen C. B., Scheraga H. A. Experimental and theoretical aspects of protein folding. Adv Protein Chem. 1975;29:205–300. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(08)60413-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burgess A. W., Scheraga H. A. Assessment of some problems associated with prediction of the three-dimensional structure of a protein from its amino-acid sequence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Apr;72(4):1221–1225. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.4.1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Creighton T. E. The two-disulphide intermediates and the folding pathway of reduced pancreatic trypsin inhibitor. J Mol Biol. 1975 Jun 25;95(2):167–199. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90389-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Crippen G. M., Scheraga H. A. Minimization of polypeptide energy. X. A global search algorithm. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1971 Jun;144(2):453–461. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(71)90348-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hagler A. T., Huler E., Lifson S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. I. Derivation of a consistent force field including the hydrogen bond from amide crystals. J Am Chem Soc. 1974 Aug 21;96(17):5319–5327. doi: 10.1021/ja00824a004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hagler A. T., Lifson S. Energy functions for peptides and proteins. II. The amide hydrogen bond and calculation of amide crystal properties. J Am Chem Soc. 1974 Aug 21;96(17):5327–5335. doi: 10.1021/ja00824a005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Honig B., Ray A., Levinthal C. Conformational flexibility and protein folding: rigid structural fragments connected by flexible joints in subtilisin BPN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jun;73(6):1974–1978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.73.6.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Huber R., Kukla D., Rühlmann A., Steigemann W. Pancreatic trypsin inhibitor (Kunitz). I. Structure and function. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1972;36:141–148. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1972.036.01.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kuntz I. D., Crippen G. M., Kollman P. A., Kimelman D. Calculation of protein tertiary structure. J Mol Biol. 1976 Oct 5;106(4):983–994. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90347-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Levitt M. A simplified representation of protein conformations for rapid simulation of protein folding. J Mol Biol. 1976 Jun 14;104(1):59–107. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(76)90004-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Levitt M., Warshel A. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature. 1975 Feb 27;253(5494):694–698. doi: 10.1038/253694a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rossmann M. G., Argos P. The taxonomy of protein structure. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jan 5;109(1):99–129. doi: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80048-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Schulz G. E. Structural rules for globular proteins. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1977;16(1):23–32. doi: 10.1002/anie.197700231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tanaka S., Scheraga H. A. Model of protein folding: inclusion of short-, medium-, and long-range interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Oct;72(10):3802–3806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.10.3802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES