Abstract
Heat shock, sudden change in temperature, triggers various responses in cells for protecting the cells from such a severe circumstance. Here we investigated gene silencing mediated by endogenous microRNAs (miRNAs) in mammalian cells exposed to a mild hyperthermia, by means of miRNA activity assay using a luciferase reporter gene as well as miRNA expression analysis using a DNA microarray. Our findings indicated that the gene silencing activities involving miRNAs were enhanced without increasing in their expression levels under heat-stress conditions. Additionally, the gene silencing activity appeared to be independent of the cytoprotective action involving heat shock proteins that are immediately activated in heat-shocked cells and that function as molecular chaperons for restoring heat-denatured proteins to normal proteins. Our current findings suggested the possibility that gene silencing involving endogenous miRNAs might play a subsidiary role in heat-shocked cells for an aggressive inhibition of the expression of heat-denatured proteins.
Introduction
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 21∼23-nucleotide-long small non-coding RNAs that are processed from longer (initial) transcripts forming stem-loop structure by digestion with RNase III enzymes, Drosha in the nucleus and Dicer in the cytoplasm. The processed, or matured, miRNA is incorporated into the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) and functions as a mediator in gene silencing (review articles [1]–[3]). MicroRNAs play essential roles in gene regulation by inhibiting translation of messenger RNAs (mRNAs) that are partially complementary to the miRNAs, and by digestion of mRNAs that are nearly complementary to the miRNAs, or by RNA interference (RNAi), during various vital function and phenomenon such as cell proliferation, differentiation, development and senescence [1]–[6].
Hundreds of miRNA genes have been found in animals and plants [see the microRNA database (miRBase): http://www.mirbase.org/index.shtml]. Most of miRNA genes appear to be expressed by RNA polymerase II [7], and expression profile analyses of miRNAs provide us with useful information in understanding complex gene regulation involving miRNAs as well as in characterizing miRNAs themselves. Many expression studies on miRNAs in various tissues and cells have been carried out, thereby revealing tissue- and stage-specific expression of miRNAs [8]–[14]. In mammals, it has been found that a major small RNA class transition from retrotransposon-derived small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) to zygotically expressed miRNAs occurs during pre-implantation development [15], and tissue- or organ-specific expression patterns of miRNAs are generated thereafter. MicroRNAs appear to participate in various vital functions via gene regulation involving their gene silencing (review articles [16]–[18]), and some of them may be capable of becoming useful molecular markers that reflect biological changes and functions.
Heat shock, sudden change in temperature, is an external stress; and cells that are subjected to heat shock immediately respond to such an environmental stress for protecting themselves and for maintenance of homeostasis. A major response to heat shock is the expression of a certain set of proteins, referred to as heat-shock proteins (HSPs), and HSPs play important roles in cells under heat stress conditions (review articles [19]–[22]). Of the HSP functions, the role of HSPs as a molecular chaperon appears to be particularly important, and misfolded proteins that are caused by heat shock may be helped for refolding into their correct shapes by association with HSPs. A recent study suggested that HSP70 and HSP90 likely associated with Ago2 protein that is a major component of RISC, and would participate in loading of small RNAs into RISCs [23]; the findings lead us to the possibility that there may be some sort of relationship between heat shock and gene silencing.
In this study, we investigated gene silencing mediated by endogenous miRNAs in mammalian cells that were subjected to a mild hyperthermia, and our findings suggested that the activity of gene silencing involving many miRNAs was increased without increasing in their expression levels under such heat-stress conditions.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture
HeLa cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Wako, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Wako) at 37°C in 5% CO2 humidified chamber. For heat shock, cells were subjected to a mild hyperthermia at 40°C for 12 h in 5% CO2 humidified chamber.
DNA and RNA oligonucleotides
DNA oligonucleotides and small RNA duplexes used in this study were synthesized by and purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO, USA), respectively.
Inhibitors used in this study
Geldanamycin (LC Laboratories, Woburn, MA, USA), LY294002 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), PD98059 (Cell Signaling Technology) and SB203580 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) used as HSP90-, PI3K-, MEK- and p38/MAPK-inhibitors, respectively, were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich).
Construction of reporter genes
To examine the effects of endogenous miRNAs on gene silencing against their targets, we constructed reporter genes with the psiCHECK-2 vector (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) (Fig. S1): the Renilla luciferase gene carrying the complementary (target) sequence of miRNAs in the 3′ untranslated region was constructed as described previously [24]. The target sequences synthesized in the construction are indicated in Table S1.
Transfection of reporter plasmids and reporter assay
The day before transfection, HeLa cells were trypsinized, diluted with medium without antibiotics, and seeded onto 96-well culture plates (0.25–0.5×104 cells/well). The psiCHECK-2-backbone plasmids (20 ng/well) were introduced into cells by using a Lipofectamine2000 transfection reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 18 h-incubation, the cells were exposed to a mild hyperthermia at 40°C for 12 h. After heat treatment, cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer (Promega), and the expression of Photinus and Renilla luciferases were examined by a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay system (Promega) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The luminescent signals were measured by means of a Fusion Universal Microplate Analyzer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
The pGL4 vectors carrying various response elements (Promega) (40 ng/well) were introduced together with the phRL-TK plasmid (10 ng/well, Promega) into HeLa cells, and the cells were subjected to a mild hyperthermia at 40°C followed by dual luciferase assay as described above. The pGL4 vectors used in this study were as follows (abbreviated name used in this study):
pGL4-27 [luc2P/minP/Hygro] (minP), pGL4-41 [luc2P/HSE/Hygro] (HSE), pGL4.29 [luc2P/CRE/Hygro] (CRE), pGL4.32 [luc2P/NF-κB-RE/Hygro] (NF-κB-RE), pGL4.33 [luc2P/SRE/Hygro] (SRE), pGL4.34 [luc2P/SRF-RE/Hygro] (SRF-RE).
RNAi knockdown
To silence the HSF1 gene, two siRNAs were designed and chemically synthesized. The synthetic siRNAs (30 nM, final concentration) were transfected into cells, using a Lipofectamine2000 transfection reagent (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The treated cells were incubated for 48 h and subjected to subsequent examinations. The sequences of the siRNAs were as follows:
siHSF1 #1;
Sense-strand; 5′ - GGCCAUGAAGCAUGAGAAUUU-3′
Antisense-strand; 5′ - AUUCUCAUGCUUCAUGGCCUU-3′
siHSF1 #2;
Sense-strand; 5′ - GUUGUUCAUAGUCAGAAUUUU-3′
Antisense-strand; 5′ - AAUUCUGACUAUGAACAACUU-3′
Total RNA preparation and reverse transcription (RT)-(real time)-polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
Total RNAs were extracted from cells using a TRI Reagent (MRC, Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesis for matured miRNAs was carried out using a TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Life Technologies) with TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (Life Technologies), and cDNA synthesis for primary miRNAs was performed using Random hexamers (Life Technologies) and a Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was carried out using the AB7300 Real Time PCR System (Life Technologies) with a FastStart Universal Probe Master Mix (Roche) together with TaqMan MicroRNA Assays (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The TaqMan MicroRNA and Pri-miRNA Assays used were as follows (Assay IDs are indicated in parentheses):
hsa-miR-29a (2112), hsa-miR-221 (524), hsa-miR-193a-3p (2250), hsa-miR-135b (2261), hsa-miR-186 (2285), hsa-miR-296 (527), hsa-miR-125b (449), hsa-miR-92 (430), hsa-miR-16 (391), hsa-miR-19b (396), hsa-miR-26a (405), hsa-miR-29b (413), snoU6 RNA (1232), hsa-miR-494 (2365), and hsa-miR-494 (Hs04225959; Pri-miRNA assay)
To examine endogenous gene expression, total RNAs were prepared from cell extract containing 0.1 ng (1.8×108 copies) of λpolyA+ RNA-A [External Standard Kit (λpolyA) for qPCR; TAKARA BIO, Otsu, Shiga, Japan] that was added as an external control, and subjected to cDNA synthesis using oligo (dT)15 primers (Promega) and a Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The resultant cDNAs were subjected to qPCR analysis using the AB 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with a FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) and Perfect Real Time primers (TAKARA BIO) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The Perfect Real Time primers used were as follows (TAKARA BIO primer-set IDs):
COL4A1 (HA156982), COL4A2 (HA174126), CABIN1 (HA183487), DNMT1 (HA002770), DICER1 (HA174786), LAMC1 (HA083467) and GAPDH (HA067812).
The level of λpolyA+ RNA-A as an external control was examined by qPCR using the AB 7300 Real Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) with a FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche) and an External Standard Kit (λpolyA) for qPCR (TAKARA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Western blot analysis
Cells were washed with PBS (Wako) and lysed in RIPA buffer [25 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.6), 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.5% NP-40] containing 1 x protease inhibitor cocktail (Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablets; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The lysate was incubated on ice for 20 min, sonicated (10 sec, 3 times) and centrifuged at 14,000×g for 10 min at 4°C. The resultant supernatant (cell lysate) was collected. Protein concentration of the cell lysate was measured by a protein quantification kit-wide range (DOJINDO, Mashiki-town, Kumamoto, Japan). Equal amounts of protein (∼40 µg) were mixed with 2 x sample buffer (125 mM Tris-HCl pH6.8, 2% glycerol, 4% SDS, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 10% beta-mercaptoethanol) and boiled for 5 min. The protein samples were electrophoretically separated on 8% or 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE), and blotted onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Immobilon P; Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated for 1 h in blocking buffer (TBS-T containing 5% skim milk) and then with diluted primary antibodies at 4°C overnight or at room temperature for 1 h. After incubation, the membranes were washed in TBS-T, and incubated with 1/5000 diluted horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) or goat anti-rabbit IgG (Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min at room temperature. Antigen-antibody complexes were visualized using an Immobilon western (Millipore) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primary antibodies used in Western blotting and their product IDs and dilution ratios in parentheses were as follows:
Anti-Akt (#9272, 1/1000), anti-HSF1 (#4356, 1/1000), anti-DICER (#3363, 1/1000), and anti-AGO2 (#2897, 1/1000) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-HSP90AB1 (SAB4300541, 1/1000), anti-HSP70 (SAB2700846, 1/1000), anti-HSP27 (SAB4501457, 1/1000), and anti-α-Tubulin (F2168, 1/5000) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
DNA chip analysis
Genopal −MICH07 DNA chips (Mitsubishi Rayon, Tokyo, Japan) were used for detection of human miRNAs as described previously [6], [11]. DNA oligonucleotide probes for 188 miRNAs are installed on the DNA chip, and the list of the detectable miRNAs is available at the following address: http://www.mrc.co.jp/genome/pdf/products/micro_rna_mich07.pdf.
Accession number
The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession number of the miRNA expression data used in this study is GSE53745.
Results
Enhancement of gene silencing involving miRNAs after heat shock
To examine gene silencing involving a number of miRNAs at one time, or the profile of gene silencing, we constructed 143 reporter plasmids that carried the complementary sequences of various human matured miRNAs, which were relatively initially-identified and randomly-selected, in the 3′-untranslated region of the Renilla luciferase reporter gene based on the psiCHECK-2 vector used as a backbone plasmid (Fig. S1 and Table S1). The reporter plasmids allow for identification of active miRNAs that are working as mediators in RISCs in cells; and analyses with the reporter plasmids together with expression profile analyses of miRNAs by a DNA microarray that can detect the physical presence of miRNAs containing active and inactive miRNAs may provide us with valuable information on the regulation of gene silencing, for example a possible regulation of functional miRNAs in RISCs under different conditions.
Our current study investigated gene silencing involving endogenous miRNAs under heat-stress conditions by using the constructed reporter plasmids and a DNA microarray for miRNAs. HeLa cells were subjected to a mild hyperthermia at 40°C for 12 h, and the cells appeared to respond to the heat stress: immediate phosphorylation of heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1) and marked increase in heat shock protein 27 (HSP27) and 70 (HSP70) after the treatment were detected by Western blotting (Fig. 1A and B). Under such a heat-stress or heat-shocked condition, gene silencing activities involving miRNAs were investigated by means of the constructed reporter plasmids (Figs. 1C and S2). Interestingly, apparent suppression efficiencies involving a number of miRNAs in heat-shocked HeLa cells appeared to be enhanced relative to those in naïve cells (under a normal condition, at 37°C); as a matter of course, there were miRNAs (e.g., miR-135b-5p and miR-186-5p) that conferred no significant difference in suppression efficiency between the heat-shocked and naïve cells, as well as miRNAs associated with the reduction of the efficiencies. As a possible interpretation of the results, change of miRNA expression correlated to the alteration of gene silencing activity might have happened in heat-shocked cells.
As additional data, the expression levels of the luciferase reporter genes appeared to be slightly reduced in heat-shocked cells (Fig. S3), suggesting the possibility that the promoters of the reporter genes might be influenced by heat shock. In this study, gene silencing efficiencies involving endogenous miRNAs were examined and compared based on normalized suppression ratios of target reporter genes under each temperature condition; hence little or no biased assessment might occur in the comparison. Additionally, even though the reduction of gene expression under heat-stress conditions might influence the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing, it cannot fully explain the enhancement of the suppression efficiency, in light of exceptional instances that showed little or no difference in the suppression efficiency between heat-shocked and naïve cells (Figs. 1C and S2).
Expression profile of miRNAs in heat-shocked cells
To investigate the expression level of miRNAs in heat-shocked and naïve HeLa cells, we performed expression profile analyses of miRNAs by using Genopal–MICH07 DNA chips [6], [11]. Duplicated DNA chip analyses with independently prepared RNA samples exhibited reproducible results; and the results, contrary to our expectation, revealed no significant difference in the expression profiles between the heat-shocked and naïve HeLa cells except for miR-494 in heat-shocked cells (Fig. 2A). We confirmed the data by RT-qPCR and obtained consistent results (Fig. 2B). As for miR-494, we did not know why, but little or no difference in its level was detected by RT-qPCR with different samples prepared from different cells (Fig. S4A). In addition, no significant difference in gene silencing activity involving miR-494 between naïve and heat-shocked cells was also seen (Fig. S4B).
Together with the data of gene silencing profile (Figs. 1C and S2), the findings suggested the possibility that the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing might be capable of changing without increasing and decreasing in the level of miRNAs in heat-shocked cells.
Expression of AGO2, DICER, and endogenous genes under heat-stress conditions
We tried to find the factor(s) that is implicated in changing the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing under heat-stress conditions. Since heat stress most likely influences existing proteins and gene expression in cells, we first examined AGO2 and DICER, both of which are key proteins in gene silencing, by Western blotting. As shown in Fig. 1A, either AGO2 or DICER looked like showing little change in the level over the course of heat treatment at 40°C by our Western blotting analyses, though a previous study reported an increase in the level of DICER under a heat-shocked condition (39.5°C) [25].
We also investigated the expression of endogenous genes carrying putative binding sites of miRNAs in their 3′-untranslated regions (3′UTRs): the type IV alpha collagen (COL4A1 and COL4A2 encoding α1 and α2 chain, respectively), Laminin, gamma 1 (LAMC1), DICER1, DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), calcineurin binding protein 1 (CABIN1) and GAPDH genes were examined. RT-qPCR analyses using λpolyA+ RNA-A as an external control indicated that the expression level of COL4A2, DICER1, LAMC1, DNMT1 and GAPDH was significantly decreased after heat shock; but COL4A1 and CABIN1 appeared to remain unchanged (Fig. S5). Since the apparent expression level of genes is likely dependent upon transcriptional activity and post-transcriptional regulation, the decrease in the level of COL4A2, DICER1, LAMC1, DNMT1 and GAPDH after heat shock might reflect in part the enhancement of miRNA-mediated gene silencing, and the level of COL4A1 and CABIN1 might have been influenced by a strong transcriptional activity. Regarding a discrepancy between the DICER1 mRNA level and its protein level, the stability of the protein may influence the results: the protein might be stable in some degree even under heat-stress conditions, and a slight difference in the level of the protein might be exhibited after heat-shock. But, such a difference could not be detected by our Western blot analysis.
With regard to alteration of the whole of gene expression after heat shock, our findings appeared to be consistent with the previous gene expression profile analysis indicating a major shift of mRNA population after heat shock, in which many genes were downregulated after heat shock [26]. Taken together, the mRNA level of many genes is presumably decreased under heat-stress conditions.
Association of HSP90 with gene silencing
Recent studies suggested that HSP90, which functions as a molecular chaperon, was involved in loading small RNA duplexes into AGO proteins in an ATP-dependent manner [23], and that HSP90-alpha, an isoform of HSP90, was upregulated by heat shock [27]. Accordingly, we examined whether HSP90 participated in changing in the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing under heat-stress conditions. Gene silencing assay with reporter plasmids was carried out in heat-shocked HeLa cells in the presence and absence of geldanamycin that is a HSP90 inhibitor capable of binding to the ATP-binding domain of HSP90 [28]. To verify the inhibitory efficacy of geldanamycin on HSP90, first we investigated AKT and HSF1: AKT is a client protein of HSP90 and maintained stable by HSP90, and HSF1 is also associated with HSP90 under normal condition [21], [28]–[30]. Western blot analysis revealed that AKT was markedly decreased in the level after treatment with geldanamycin, indicating the instability of AKT by inhibition of HSP90 (Fig. 3A). The binding of geldanamycin to HSP90 is also conductive to dissociation of HSF1 from HSP90, thereby activating HSF1 [29], [30]. To examine the activation of HSF1, we introduced the pGL4-HSE reporter plasmid carrying the heat shock element (HSE) in the promoter region of the Photinus luciferase reporter gene into HeLa cells and treated the cells with and without geldanamycin. As shown in Fig. 3B, the geldanamycin treatment resulted in increase in the expression of the luciferase under either normal or mild hyperthermia conditions, and the expression of the reporter gene in the geldanamycin- plus heat-treated HeLa cells was markedly increased. All the data above indicated that the inhibition of HSP90 by geldanamycin had properly occurred in our treated cells. However, the gene silencing assay with and without the geldanamycin treatment exhibited similar results between them (Fig. 3C). Therefore, the findings suggested that HSP90 might hardly contribute to changing in the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing under heat-stress conditions.
HSP90 is also known to be associated with cytoplasmic processing bodies (P-bodies) and stress granules, in which translationally inactivated mRNA and small RNAs including miRNAs appear to be sequestered [31]–[33]. Previous studies suggested that P-bodies themselves were not prerequisite for miRNA-mediated gene silencing, but that P-body formation was likely a consequence of gene silencing against mRNAs [33], [34]. Accordingly, the enhancement of miRNA-mediated gene silencing might contribute to acceleration of P-body formation under heat-stress conditions in a HSP90 independent manner.
Effects of HSF1 knockdown on gene silencing involving miRNAs
Heat shock stress most likely stimulates (activates) various vital pathways including heat shock responses triggered by HSF1 [20]–[22]. HSF1 is known to be phosphorylated as an immediate response to heat shock, and phosphorylated HSF1 is capable of binding to HSEs in the promoters of HSP genes, i.e., HSF1 likely works as an initial triggering molecule in heat shock responses. Accordingly, we investigated miRNA-mediated gene silencing under a HSF1-suppressed condition by RNAi. We designed siRNAs against HSF1 and the siRNAs could confer a strong inhibition of HSF1 (Fig. 4A). In addition, the expression of the luciferase reporter gene linked with HSE was consistently suppressed in the presence of our designed siRNAs (Fig. 4B). Under such a HSF1-suppressed condition, the activity of gene silencing involving miRNAs was examined, and the results displayed similar profiles of the gene silencing activity between the HSF1-knockdown and naïve HeLa cells (Fig. 4C). Therefore, it was suggested that HSF1 might hardly participate in changing the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing in heat-stressed cells.
Influence of the inhibition of signal pathways on gene silencing
Not only HSF1 but also other factors that participate in vital signal pathways may be activated by heat shock [22], [35]–[38]. In fact, our findings indicated that the reporter genes carrying either the cAMP response element (CRE), serum response factor response element (SRF-RE), or serum response element (SRE) [39]–[41] as well as HSE were activated by heat shock (Fig. S6). In addition, recent studies suggested that signal pathways involving PI3K/AKT and MAPK participated in the posttranslational modification of AGO2 [42]–[44], leading to the possibility that PI3K/AKT and MAPK might be involved in gene silencing. We investigated miRNA-mediated gene silencing in the presence of protein kinase inhibitors directed to PI3K, MEK and p38/MAPK. As shown in Fig. S7, the results indicated that the examined protein kinase inhibitors, like geldanamycin and siHSF1, hardly influenced the gene silencing profiles mediated by miRNAs in either heat-treated or naïve HeLa cells, suggesting that the signal pathways involving PI3K, MEK and p38/MAPK might not be involved in changing the suppression efficiency of miRNA-mediated gene silencing in heat-shocked cells.
Discussion
Sudden change in temperature, or heat shock, is a substantial stress to cells, and cells immediately respond to such a stress for protecting themselves and for maintenance of homeostasis. Heat-denaturation of proteins is a major harmful occurrence in heat-shocked cells. To restore such denatured proteins to normal proteins and to mitigate the harmful state of cells, heat-shocked cells immediately activate and express HSPs that function as a molecular chaperon. HSPs appear to play important roles in the posttranslational restoration and/or maintenance of proteins under heat stress conditions [19]–[22]. Another possible response to heat stress is presumably the suppression of expression except for the expression of HSPs, thereby possibly leading to the reduction of heat-denatured proteins in heat-shocked cells. The previous study [26] and our data (Fig. S5) consistently showed that many genes were downregulated after heat shock. In this study, we focused on the gene silencing mediated by endogenous miRNAs as a potential contributor to mitigate the harmful gene products caused by heat stress or heat denaturation, and our findings suggested that the activity of the gene silencing was enhanced in mammalian cells which exposed to a mild hyperthermia. The enhancement of the gene silencing presumably makes sense in heat-shocked cells where the emergence of misfolded proteins or heat-denatured proteins were aggressively suppressed. Because the gene silencing involving miRNAs is a post-transcriptional inhibition, or a pre-translational inhibition, the enhancement of the gene silencing under heat-stress conditions may help the suppression of the emergence of heat-denatured proteins via its aggressive inhibition of translation. Therefore, we propose that the gene silencing mediated by miRNAs, together with HSP chaperons, likely participate in the protection of cells from harmful heat-stress conditions by engaging in the prevention of the emergence of heat-denatured proteins in heat-shocked cells.
It is of interest to understand the mechanism of the enhancement of miRNA-mediated gene silencing in heat-shocked cells. Our current findings suggested that the enhancement of the gene silencing was probably independent of the cytoprotective action involving HSPs, though the recent study indicated that either HSP70 or HSP90 would be associated with AGO2, which is a key component of RISC, and involved in loading small RNA duplexes into RISCs [23]. Additionally, our data exhibited that no significant decrease nor increase in either AGO2 or DICER occurred after heat treatment. The previous gene expression analyses in heat-treated and untreated Hsf1-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts revealed that certain clusters of genes were upregulated after heat shock even in the absence of Hsf1 [45], and genes related to gene silencing such as Ago2 and Dicer were absent from the clusters of genes. Accordingly, the enhancement of miRNA-mediated gene silencing might not be caused by change in the expression of gene silencing-related genes.
AGO2 is known to be phosphorylated. AKT, MAPK-activated protein kinase-II (MKII), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) appeared to be involved in the phosphorylation of AGO2 [42], [43], [46]; and previous studies indicated that AKT and MKII were activated by heat shock [35]–[37]. Our experiments consistently showed that the reporter genes carrying SRE, SRF-RE and CRE as well as HSE were activated by a mild hyperthermia (Fig. S6), i.e., heat shock activated signaling pathways. Based on the findings, we performed inhibition assays with various inhibitors including protein kinase inhibitors; however, little or no influence of the inhibitors on the enhancement of the miRNA-mediated gene silencing under heat-stress conditions was observed in our current study.
From the findings presented here, we speculated possible mechanisms for the enhancement of the miRNA-mediated gene silencing under heat-stress conditions: (i) superfluous thermal energy by heat shock might cause a conformational change in AGO2 (or RISC as a whole) and such a conformational change might facilitate efficient scanning of target mRNAs as well as loading of miRNAs to RISCs in a HSP90 independent manner, thereby inducing the enhancement of the miRNA-mediated gene silencing; and alternatively (ii) unknown factor(s) which was unaffected by the inhibitors used in this study might be involved in the enhancement triggered by heat shock. In either case, more extensive studies need to be carried out to elucidate the mechanism(s) of the enhancement of miRNA-mediated gene silencing under heat-stress conditions.
It should be noted that heat-shocked cells appeared to possess miRNAs that conferred unchanged gene silencing and the reduction of gene silencing, as well as miRNAs associated with the enhancement of gene silencing; i.e., at least three sorts of miRNAs, which are involved in unchanged, weakened and enhanced gene silencing, may exist in heat-shocked cells. Such differences in miRNAs might be caused by (or dependent upon) the sequences of miRNAs themselves. On a relevant note, different small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which are equal to miRNAs, are capable of inducing different levels of RNAi activity in mammalian cells [47], [48], i.e., siRNA-dependent gene silencing in mammalian cells. Therefore, miRNA-dependent regulation of gene silencing might occur in heat-shocked cells as well. To further clarify the difference between miRNAs conferring enhanced gene silencing and unchanged gene silencing in heat-shocked cells as well as to elucidate the mechanism of the enhancement of miRNA-mediated gene silencing, more extensive studies need to be carried out in the future.
Finally, our current study may shed light on a new contribution of gene silencing mediated by endogenous miRNAs to aggressive suppression of the emergence of heat-denatured proteins in heat-shocked cells, and also provide a new insight into the cytoprotective action against heat-stress environment.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank T. Fukushima, H. Oshima, and Y. Tamura for their kind assistance.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by research grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan and by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. He L, Hannon GJ (2004) MicroRNAs: small RNAs with a big role in gene regulation. Nat Rev Genet 5: 522–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Ambros V (2004) The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 431: 350–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Filipowicz W, Bhattacharyya SN, Sonenberg N (2008) Mechanisms of post-transcriptional regulation by microRNAs: are the answers in sight? Nat Rev Genet 9: 102–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Stefani G, Slack FJ (2008) Small non-coding RNAs in animal development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 219–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Gorospe M, Abdelmohsen K (2011) MicroRegulators come of age in senescence. Trends Genet 27: 233–241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Takahashi M, Eda A, Fukushima T, Hohjoh H (2012) Reduction of type IV collagen by upregulated miR-29 in normal elderly mouse and klotho-deficient, senescence-model mouse. PLoS One 7: e48974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lee Y, Kim M, Han J, Yeom KH, Lee S, et al. (2004) MicroRNA genes are transcribed by RNA polymerase II. EMBO J 23: 4051–4060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lagos-Quintana M, Rauhut R, Yalcin A, Meyer J, Lendeckel W, et al. (2002) Identification of tissue-specific microRNAs from mouse. Curr Biol 12: 735–739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Liu CG, Calin GA, Meloon B, Gamliel N, Sevignani C, et al. (2004) An oligonucleotide microchip for genome-wide microRNA profiling in human and mouse tissues. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 9740–9744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Babak T, Zhang W, Morris Q, Blencowe BJ, Hughes TR (2004) Probing microRNAs with microarrays: tissue specificity and functional inference. RNA 10: 1813–1819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Hohjoh H, Fukushima T (2007) Expression profile analysis of microRNA (miRNA) in mouse central nervous system using a new miRNA detection system that examines hybridization signals at every step of washing. Gene 391: 39–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hohjoh H, Fukushima T (2007) Marked change in microRNA expression during neuronal differentiation of human teratocarcinoma NTera2D1 and mouse embryonal carcinoma P19 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 362: 360–367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Eda A, Tamura Y, Yoshida M, Hohjoh H (2009) Systematic gene regulation involving miRNAs during neuronal differentiation of mouse P19 embryonic carcinoma cell. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 388: 648–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eda A, Takahashi M, Fukushima T, Hohjoh H (2011) Alteration of microRNA expression in the process of mouse brain growth. Gene 485: 46–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Ohnishi Y, Totoki Y, Toyoda A, Watanabe T, Yamamoto Y, et al. (2010) Small RNA class transition from siRNA/piRNA to miRNA during pre-implantation mouse development. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 5141–5151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kosik KS (2006) The neuronal microRNA system. Nat Rev Neurosci 7: 911–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Liu N, Olson EN (2010) MicroRNA regulatory networks in cardiovascular development. Dev Cell 18: 510–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sayed D, Abdellatif M (2011) MicroRNAs in development and disease. Physiol Rev 91: 827–887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Taipale M, Jarosz DF, Lindquist S (2010) HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 515–528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Richter K, Haslbeck M, Buchner J (2010) The heat shock response: life on the verge of death. Mol Cell 40: 253–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Anckar J, Sistonen L (2011) Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease. Annu Rev Biochem 80: 1089–1115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Velichko AK, Markova EN, Petrova NV, Razin SV, Kantidze OL (2013) Mechanisms of heat shock response in mammals. Cell Mol Life Sci 70: 4229–4241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Iwasaki S, Kobayashi M, Yoda M, Sakaguchi Y, Katsuma S, et al. (2010) Hsc70/Hsp90 chaperone machinery mediates ATP-dependent RISC loading of small RNA duplexes. Mol Cell 39: 292–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tamura Y, Yoshida M, Ohnishi Y, Hohjoh H (2009) Variation of gene silencing involving endogenous microRNA in mammalian cells. Mol Biol Rep 36: 1413–1420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Oshlag JZ, Devasthanam AS, Tomasi TB (2013) Mild hyperthermia enhances the expression and induces oscillations in the Dicer protein. Int J Hyperthermia 29: 51–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. van de Peppel J, Kemmeren P, van Bakel H, Radonjic M, van Leenen D, et al. (2003) Monitoring global messenger RNA changes in externally controlled microarray experiments. EMBO Rep 4: 387–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Hickey E, Brandon SE, Smale G, Lloyd D, Weber L (1989) Sequence and regulation of a gene encoding a human 89-kilodalton heat shock protein. Mol Cell Biol 9: 2615–2626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Hong DS, Banerji U, Tavana B, George GC, Aaron J, et al. (2013) Targeting the molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (HSP90): lessons learned and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev 39: 375–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Zou J, Guo Y, Guettouche T, Smith DF, Voellmy R (1998) Repression of heat shock transcription factor HSF1 activation by HSP90 (HSP90 Complex) that forms a stress-sensitive complex with HSF1. Cell 94: 471–480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hancock MK, Xia M, Frey ES, Sakamuru S, Bi K (2009) HTS-Compatible beta-Lactamase Transcriptional Reporter Gene Assay for Interrogating the Heat Shock Response Pathway. Curr Chem Genomics 3: 1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Suzuki Y, Minami M, Suzuki M, Abe K, Zenno S, et al. (2009) The Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin abrogates colocalization of eIF4E and eIF4E-transporter into stress granules and association of eIF4E with eIF4G. J Biol Chem 284: 35597–35604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Pare JM, Tahbaz N, Lopez-Orozco J, LaPointe P, Lasko P, et al. (2009) Hsp90 regulates the function of argonaute 2 and its recruitment to stress granules and P-bodies. Mol Biol Cell 20: 3273–3284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Johnston M, Geoffroy MC, Sobala A, Hay R, Hutvagner G (2010) HSP90 protein stabilizes unloaded argonaute complexes and microscopic P-bodies in human cells. Mol Biol Cell 21: 1462–1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Eulalio A, Behm-Ansmant I, Schweizer D, Izaurralde E (2007) P-body formation is a consequence, not the cause, of RNA-mediated gene silencing. Mol Cell Biol 27: 3970–3981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Shaw M, Cohen P, Alessi DR (1998) The activation of protein kinase B by H2O2 or heat shock is mediated by phosphoinositide 3-kinase and not by mitogen-activated protein kinaseactivated protein kinase-2. Biochem J 336: 241–246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Bang OS, Ha BG, Park EK, Kang SS (2000) Activation of Akt is induced by heat shock and involved in suppression of heat-shock-induced apoptosis of NIH3T3 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 278: 306–311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Park HG, Han SI, Oh SY, Kang HS (2005) Cellular responses to mild heat stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 10–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Madlener S, Rosner M, Krieger S, Giessrigl B, Gridling M, et al. (2009) Short 42 degrees C heat shock induces phosphorylation and degradation of Cdc25A which depends on p38MAPK, Chk2 and 14.3.3. Hum Mol Genet 18: 1990–2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Carlezon WA Jr, Duman RS, Nestler EJ (2005) The many faces of CREB. Trends Neurosci 28: 436–445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Turjanski AG, Vaque JP, Gutkind JS (2007) MAP kinases and the control of nuclear events. Oncogene 26: 3240–3253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Alberini CM (2009) Transcription Factors in Long-Term Memory and Synaptic Plasticity. Physiol Rev 89: 121–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Zeng Y, Sankala H, Zhang X, Graves PR (2008) Phosphorylation of Argonaute 2 at serine-387 facilitates its localization to processing bodies. Biochem J 413: 429–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Horman SR, Janas MM, Litterst C, Wang B, MacRae IJ, et al. (2013) Akt-mediated phosphorylation of argonaute 2 downregulates cleavage and upregulates translational repression of MicroRNA targets. Mol Cell 50: 356–367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Meister G (2013) Argonaute proteins: functional insights and emerging roles. Nat Rev Genet 14: 447–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Trinklein ND, Murray JI, Hartman SJ, Botstein D, Myers RM (2004) The role of heat shock transcription factor 1 in the genome-wide regulation of the mammalian heat shock response. Mol Biol Cell 15: 1254–1261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shen J, Xia W, Khotskaya YB, Huo L, Nakanishi K, et al. (2013) EGFR modulates microRNA maturation in response to hypoxia through phosphorylation of AGO2. Nature 497: 383–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Hohjoh H (2004) Enhancement of RNAi activity by improved siRNA duplexes. FEBS Letters 557: 193–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Hibio N, Hino K, Shimizu E, Nagata Y, Ui-Tei K (2012) Stability of miRNA 5′terminal and seed regions is correlated with experimentally observed miRNA-mediated silencing efficacy. Sci Rep 2: 996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.